Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013 Jul 12;6(9):908–916. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0171

Chemoprevention of Colon and Small Intestinal Tumorigenesis in APCmin/+ Mice by SHetA2 (NSC721689) without Toxicity

Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook 1,2, Suresh Guruswamy 1, Yuhong Wang 3, Zhongjie Sun 3, Altaf Mohammed 1, Yuting Zhang 1, Qian Li 1, Chinthalapally V Rao 1
PMCID: PMC3769959  NIHMSID: NIHMS506743  PMID: 23852423

Abstract

The occurrence of intestinal polyps in people at high risk for developing colorectal cancer provides an opportunity to test the efficacy of chemoprevention agents. In this situation of treating otherwise healthy people, the potential for toxicity must be minimal. The small molecule flexible heteroarotinoid (Flex-Het), called SHetA2, has chemoprevention activity in organotypic cultures in vitro and lack of toxicity at doses capable of inhibiting xenograft tumor growth in vivo. The objective of this study was to evaluate SHetA2 chemoprevention activity and toxicity in the APCMin/+ murine model. Oral administration of SHetA2 at 30 and 60 mg/kg five days per week for 12 weeks significantly reduced development of intestinal polyps by 40 to 60% depending on the dose and sex of the treatment group. Immunohistochemical and Western blot analysis of polyps demonstrated reduced levels of cyclin D1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in both SHetA2 treatment groups. Western blot analysis also demonstrated SHetA2 induction of E-cadherin, Bax and caspase 3 cleavage along with reduction in Bcl-2, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), consistent with SHetA2 regulation of apoptosis, inflammation and angiogenesis. Neither dose caused weight loss nor gross toxicity in APCMin/+ or wild type littermates. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cardiac function showed no evidence of SHetA2 toxicity. SHetA2 did not alter left ventricular wall thickness. In summary, SHetA2 exerts chemoprevention activity without overt or cardiac toxicity in the APCMin/+ model. SHetA2 modulation of biomarkers in colon polyps identifies potential pharmacodynamic endpoints for SHetA2 clinical trials.

Keywords: Chemoprevention, colon polyps, flexible heteroarotinoids, SHetA2, NSC721689

Introduction

An ideal chemoprevention agent is orally bioavailable and will reduce the incidence of cancer while exerting no side effects. Based on pre-clinical data, the small molecule compounds called Flexible Heteroarotinoids (Flex-Hets, Fig. 1A) have the potential to meet these criteria (118). In vitro, Flex-Hets regulate growth, differentiation and apoptosis in cancer cells, while the effects on normal cells are limited to growth inhibition (1, 3, 6, 7, 1215). In organotypic culture, they reverse the cancerous phenotype of ovarian and kidney cancer cell lines and primary cultures (1, 13). Sulfur Heteroarotinoid A2 (SHetA2, Fig. 1A) was chosen as the lead Flex-Het because it exerted maximal cancer cell line cytotoxicity in comparison to other Flex-Hets, while not harming non-transformed cells (1, 4, 7). SHetA2 prevented carcinogen-induced transformation of human endometrial organotypic cultures (8). In vivo, the lead Flex-Het, Sulfur Heteroarotinoid A2 (SHetA2), inhibited xenograft tumor angiogenesis and growth without evidence of gross toxicity (4, 12, 13).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Experimental details and lack of toxicity. A, chemical structures of Flex-Hets and SHetA2. B, experimental design for the evaluation of SHetA2 chemoprevention activity in APCMin/+ mice and cardiac toxicity in their wild type littermates. C, changes in body weight over time in APCMin/+ mice gavaged with the indicated doses of SHetA2 or the same volume of corn oil (Control). D, body weights of wild type mice gavaged with high dose SHetA2 at the time of cardiac imaging.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Rapid Access to Intervention Development (RAID) and Rapid Access to Preventive Intervention Development (RAPID) programs completed the preclinical testing needed for an Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for initiation of SHetA2 clinical trials (5, 11, 17, 18). The ID given to SHetA2 in these studies is NSC721689. Metabolism studies identified hydroxylated metabolites that are less active than the parent SHetA2 structure (11). Twenty-eight-day toxicity studies reported no observed adverse event levels (NOAELs) of oral SHetA2 in rats to be 500 mg/kg/day (administered in 1% aqueous methylcellulose/0.2% Tween 80) and in dogs to be greater than the 1,500 mg/kg/day highest dose studied (administered in 30% aqueous Solutol® HS 15) (18). The pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that SHetA2 is bioavailable and appears to have a maximum absorption at 100 mg/kg/day (5, 11, 18). Thus, SHetA2 appears to have a good safety profile as an oral chemoprevention agent, however before entering clinical trials, in vivo chemoprevention activity needs to be demonstrated.

Colorectal cancer is a rationale cancer to target for chemoprevention studies because it has a high incidence of pre-neoplastic lesions and cancerous tumors. There are over a million new cases of colorectal cancer each year making it the second most common cancer in the Western world (19). Colon cancers are thought to arise due to a series of histopathological and molecular changes that transform normal colonic epithelial cells into a colorectal carcinoma, with an adenomatous polyp as an intermediate step in this process (20). Risk factors include age, diet and genetic predisposition, including hereditary polyposis and nonpolyposis syndromes (21). Individuals who inherit a defective allele of the Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene suffer from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), in which the intestinal epithelium is studded with hundreds of benign polyps, some of which progress to colon adenocarcinoma (22). Furthermore, most of sporadic colorectal cancers exhibit APC mutations (23).

Animal models of intestinal tumorigenesis are needed to study the pathogenesis and to develop the strategies to control the malignancy including chemoprevention. In this regard, the APCmin/+ mouse, one of the most studied models of intestinal tumorigenesis, harbors a dominant germ line mutation at codon 850 of mouse homologue of human APC gene, which is similar to the mutation in FAP patients. APCmin/+ mice develop multiple adenomas throughout the whole intestinal tract that are primarily small intestinal polyps (tubular adenomas) and fewer colon tumors (adenomas and adenocarcinomas) (24). Since the APCmin/+ mouse model is similar to the human FAP, it is extensively used in chemoprevention studies (25).

In addition to studies of chemoprevention activity, animal models offer the opportunity to evaluate potential toxicities that could be induced by the chemoprevention agent. The mechanism of SHetA2 action suggests some potential harm that might come from long-term use of SHetA2 in the general population. Mitochondrial swelling and loss of membrane potential is apparent within 15 minutes of treated human cancer cell lines with SHetA2 and other Flex-Hets (7). This suggests that SHetA2 might cause harm to organs, such as the heart, that are highly dependent upon mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondria in non-transformed human epithelial cells however, do not swell upon SHetA2 treatment, even when treatment is extended up to 24 hours (7). While this lack of effect on mitochondria on normal cells suggests that SHetA2 would not be harmful to the heart, a more definitive study in animals is needed.

The objective of this study was to determine if oral SHetA2 has sufficient chemopreventive activity and lack of toxicity to justify initiation of clinical trials. The hypothesis is that oral SHetA2 will reduce incidence and sizes of colon polyps and intestinal tumors in the APCmin/+ mouse model without causing gross or cardiac toxicity.

Materials and Methods

Breeding and genotyping of APCMin/+ mice

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines of the American Council on Animal Care and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (OUHSC). Male APCMin/+ (C57BL/6J) and female wild-type littermate mice were purchased initially from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) as founders, and our own breeding colony was established in the OUHSC rodent barrier facility and genotyped by the PCR method using primers (IMR0033 50-GCC ATC CCT TCA CGT TAG-30, IMR0034 50-TTC CAC TTT GGC ATA AGG C-30, IMR0758 50-TTC TGA GAA AGA CAG AAG TTA-30) according to vendor’s instructions. All mice were housed, 4 per cage, in ventilated cages under standardized conditions (21°C, 60% relative humidity, 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle, 20 air changes per hour). All mice were allowed ad libitum access to AIN76A diet and automated tap water purified by reverse osmosis.

Efficacy studies in APCMin/+ mice

The experimental protocol is summarized in Fig. 1B. At six weeks of age, groups of mice were gavaged with SHetA2 (obtained from the NCI RAID Program, compound NSC721689, and dissolved in corn oil) five weekdays per week at two different dose levels (30mg/kg and 60mg/kg) for 14 weeks. A control untreated group was gavaged with the same volume of corn oil. There were ten mice in each treatment group. To monitor for toxicity, male wild type C57BL/6J mice were gavaged with 60 mg/kg SHetA2 or the same volume of corn oil solvent in parallel. There were eight wild type mice per treatment group. The animals were weighed once weekly and monitored daily for signs of weight loss or lethargy that might indicate intestinal obstructionor anemia. At the end of 12 weeks, the animals were sacrificed by CO2 euthanasia and all organs were examined for gross pathological observations. Intestinal tumors were examined and counted under a dissection microscope by two independent investigators who were blinded with respect to the treatment group. Tumor size was determined by measuring along the longest diameter using digital calipers to the nearest 100 μm. Colonic and other small intestinal tumors that require further histopathologic evaluation were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin blocks, and processed by routine H&E staining. In addition, multiple samples of tumors from the small intestines, colons and normal colonic mucosa were harvested and stored in liquid nitrogen for analysis of cell proliferation, apoptosis and inflammatory markers.

In vivo cardiac imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) analysis of cardiac cycles was performed in the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF) MRI facility. The in vivo cardiac imaging was accessed by MRI on a 4.7-T. Oxford Magnet using a Bruker Avance console and a ParaVision (Bruker BioSpin MRI Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) MRI system equipped with Master gradients and a five-element cardiac phased array receiver coil. A small animal Instrument monitoring and gating system for respiration rate and electrocardiogram (ECG)-synchronized triggering was adapted to the system. Dorsal and sagittal images were acquired using a cardiac gated gradient echo (GEFI_TOMO) sequence. On the basis of these views, transverse images were prescribed and were collected with the GEFI_TOMO sequence. The following parameters were used: FOV = 4.0 × 3.0 cm, matrix = 256 × 128; repetition time=0.158 ms; recovering time = 13.22 ms; echo time = 2.0 ms; pulse angle = 301. Slice thickness was 2.0 mm. The image analysis was performed offline using the NIH Image J software version 1.33n (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The left ventricle wall thickness was measured at end-diastole and end-systole on a series of three slices showing the maximum size of the two papillary muscles while they were still connected with the myocardium. The cardiac output was determined by the average stroke volume obtained from all slices and the average heart rate obtained from the immediate post-imaging period (cardiac output = stroke volume X heart rate). In all data sets, one experienced observer manually traced the endocardial and the epicardial contours of the left ventricle. The global myocardium thickness was determined by the difference between the epicardial and endocardial areas.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin embedded, formalin-fixed sections were dewaxed and rehydrated through a series of graded alcohols. Sections were treated for 30 min with 0.6% hydrogen peroxide in methanol to destroy endogenous peroxidase prior to antigen retrieval. Antigen was retrieved by microwaving sections for 10 min in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer. Non-specific binding was inhibited by incubation in a blocking solution (10mM Tris-HCl pH7.4, 0.1M MgCl2, 0.5% Tween20, 1% BSA, 5% serum) for 1hr at room temperature. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies (cyclin D1 and PCNA, Santacruz biotech, USA) were diluted 1:100 in blocking solution and applied at 4°C overnight. Sections were washed with PBS buffer and incubated with appropriate biotinylated secondary antibody for 1hr at room temperature followed by washing and streptavidin-peroxidase complex for 1 hr. Sections were subsequently washed and stained with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride substrate (Sigma). Nuclei were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin (Sigma), washed in PBS, dehydrated through a gradient of alcohols, cleared in xylene and mounted.

Western blot analysis

Small intestinal polyps isolated from individual mice were combined to obtain sufficient tissue (5–6 samples per group). Polyps were homogenized in 1:3 volume of 100 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2) with 2 mmol/L CaCl2. After centrifugation at 100,000×g for 1 hour at 4°C, the protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined and equal amounts were electrophoresed into SDS-PAGE gels and then electroplated onto polyvinylidene difluoride nitrocellulose membranes. These membranes were blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with 5% skim milk powder and probed with primary antibodies for 1 hour. The primary antibodies COX-2 (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI), β-catenin, PCNA, cyclin D1, VEGF, Bcl-2, BAX, E-cadherin and caspase-3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were used at a dilution of 1:500. Blots were washed thrice and incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a dilution of 1:2,500 for 1 hour. The membranes were washed thrice and incubated with Super-Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) for 5 minutes and exposed to Kodak XAR5 photographic film. Intensities of each band were scanned by a computing densitometer. The α-Tubulin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was used as a loading control at a dilution of 1:1,000 for all Western blots.

Statistical analysis

Differences in the body weights and numbers of tumors among different groups were compared based on one-way ANOVA and a Tukey post-test to determine p-values between each of the groups. Differences were considered significant at the p<0.05 level. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism. For the cardiac imaging data, The Newman–Keuls procedure was used to access the significance of differences between means. Significance was set at the 95% confidence interval. Data were analyzed using SAS (SAS System for Windows, ver. 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

SHetA2 did not cause overt toxicity

APCMin/+ mice were divided into three treatment groups of ten mice each. A low dose group was gavaged with 30 mg/kg of SHetA2, the high dose group was gavaged with 60 mg/kg and the untreated control group was gavaged with the same volume of corn oil used in the treatment groups. Treatments were administered 5 weekdays per week. Total body weight was measured in the APCMin/+ mice and compared between treatment groups as an indication of general toxicity. There were no significant differences in the body weights or growth between the three treatment groups of APCMin/+ mice (Fig. 1C). Wild type C57BL/6J littermates gavaged with the higher 60 mg/kg dose also did not exhibit significant differences in body weight compared to the untreated control group of wild type mice (Fig 1D). None of the animals that were treated with SHetA2 exhibited any observable toxicities or gross histopathological changes. Neither of the SHetA2 doses assayed caused intestinal ulceration or acute toxicity.

SHetA2 did not exert cardiac toxicity

The group of wild type mice gavaged with the higher 60 mg/kg dose of SHetA2 was evaluated for cardiac toxicity in comparison to the control untreated group of wild type mice using MRI. The investigators were blinded to knowing the treatment groups to which the animals belonged. The stroke volume (volume of blood pumped from the heart with each beat) and cardiac output (volume of blood pumped by the heart per minute) were not significantly different between any two groups, although they were lower in the female than in the male groups (Fig. 2A and 2B, respectively). The ejection fraction (the fraction of blood pumped out of a ventricle with each heart beat) was not different significantly among groups, indicating that the cardiac work efficiency was not affected by SHetA2 (Fig. 2C). In addition, SHetA2 did not affect the left ventricle wall thickness thickness (LV, Fig. 2D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

In vivo MRI analysis of cardiac function. SHetA2 did not affect: A, stroke volume; B, cardiac output; C, ejection fraction; or D, left ventricle (LV) wall thickness. No significant difference was found between any two groups (p>0.05).

SHetA2 suppressed small intestinal polyposis and colon tumorogenesis in APCMin/+ mice

To test the chemoprevention activity of SHetA2, intestinal polyp formation was evaluated at the end of the 12 week treatment period in the groups of APCmin/+mice gavaged with 0, 30 or 60 mg/kg of SHetA2 using the same volume of corn oil for each group. The untreated control groups of male and female mice spontaneously developed on average 55.5 ± 3.9 and 47 ± 7.7 intestinal polyps, respectively. Each dose of SHetA2 significantly reduced the average number of polyps per mouse in both sexes (mean ± SD tumors for 30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg; 19.0 ± 6.5 and 21.7 ± 7.1 in male mice respectively; and 22 ± 3 and 28 ± 6.6, respectively in female mice) in a statistically significant manner (Fig. 3A and 3B). There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups. As is characteristic of this model, mice developed fewer colon tumors in comparison to small intestinal polyps. Both treatment doses significantly reduced the colon tumor multiplicity in comparison to untreated controls in males (Fig. 3C). SHetA2 reduction of colon tumors in mice was not statistically significant in females (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of SHetA2 on intestinal polyp and colon tumor incidence. Average and standard error of the number of intestinal polyps in: A, male mice and B, female mice. Average and standard error of the number of colon tumors in: C, male mice and D, female mice. P values were derived using ANOVA Tukey post test. n.s.= not significant, p>0.05.

To determine if there was a regional effect of SHetA2 on polyp multiplicity in these treatment groups, polyp distribution was determined by comparing the number of polyps in the three regions of the small intestine, namely duodenum, jejunum and ileum (Fig. 4A and 4B). Most of the polyps were observed in the jejunum, which is consistent with our previous findings, and both doses of SHetA2 significantly reduced polyp incidence in this region in both males and females. Duodenum polyps were significantly reduced by both treatment doses in females, however only the higher dose was statistically significant in males. The fewest numbers of polyps developed in the ileum, and the only significant reduction of polyps in this region was for the 30 mg/kg dose in males.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Chemoprevention effects of SHetA2 categorized by intestinal location and polyp size. Average and standard error of the number of intestinal polyps categorized by: A, intestinal polyp location in male mice and B, intestinal polyp location in female mice. C, polyp size in male mice and D, polyp size in female mice. P values were derived using ANOVA Tukey post test. n.s.= not significant, p>0.05.

The effects of SHetA2 were also evaluated specifically with regard to polyp size by categorizing the polyps into large (>2.0 mm), medium (>1–2.0mm) and small (<1.0mm) (Fig. 4C and 4D). In male mice, polyp incidences in all size categories were significantly reduced by both SHetA2 doses. In female mice, the polyp incidences in large and medium size categories were significantly reduced by both SHetA2 doses, however there were no significant differences in polyp incidence in smallest size categories between groups.

SHetA2 modulates polyp biomarkers of proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, inflammation and angiogenesis

Tissue sections of the polyps were immunohistochemically stained for expression of cyclin D1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) as biomarkers of proliferation. Compared to controls, tumors from SHetA2 treated mice had decreased cyclin D1- and PCNA-positive cells (Fig. 5A). These results were confirmed by Western blot analysis of pooled small intestinal tumors, which showed dose-responsive decreases in cyclin D1 and PCNA expression (Fig. 5B). Western blot analysis was also used to verify SHetA2 regulation of apoptosis, differentiation, inflammation and angiogenesis biomarkers in polyp tissue. SHetA2 induction of apoptosis was demonstrated by increased levels of the pro-apoptotic BAX protein and decreased levels of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein at both treatment doses (Fig 5C). In addition to the increased Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, cleaved caspase 3, another biomarker of apoptosis, was observed in both treatment groups (Fig 5C). Western blot analysis of pooled tumors also demonstrated a dose-responsive upregulation of E-cadherin as a biomarker of epithelial differentiation (Fig. 5B) and a dose-responsive inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) as a biomarker of inflammation (Fig. 5C). Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), as a biomarker of angiogenesis regulation, was dose-dependently decreased in the SHetA2 treatment groups (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of SHetA2 on biomarkers in intestinal tumors. A, Representative polyps from each treatment group evaluated for biomarkers of proliferation by immunohistochemical analysis. B and C, Western blot analysis of biomarker expression in pooled protein extracts from 3 individual polyps from each treatment group.

Discussion

The results of this study confirm that the small molecule called SHetA2 (NSC 721689) possesses in vivo chemoprevention activity without evidence of toxicity. Both doses of SHetA2 significantly reduced the incidence and sizes of small intestinal polyps in both males and females. Colon tumors were significantly reduced by both treatment doses in male mice, however the reductions in female mice were not statistically significant, which could be due to the low numbers not having sufficient power to detect significance. In a similar study, we found that dietary Bexarotene, a retinoid x receptor (RXR)-selective drug, exerted greater reduction of small intestinal tumors in APCMin/+ males in comparison to females (26)). Multiple studies have reported gender differences in the development intestinal tumors in the APCMin/+ model, with females developing greater numbers of small intestinal tumors and males developing greater numbers of colon tumors in comparison to the respective opposite sex (reviewed in (27)). While a number of factors could be responsible for this difference, a primary culprit is the observed suppressive effect of estrogen on intestinal tumorigenesis. Hormone replacement has been shown to reduce colorectal cancer incidence in women, while reducing hormones by removing the ovaries of ApcMin/+ mice increases tumor development (28, 29). The observation of differences in the responses of males and females to chemoprevention drugs indicates that males and females may need to be dosed differently in order to obtain optimal chemoprevention activity in each sex. The chemopreventive effect of SHetA2 on intestinal polyp development occurred throughout the various regions of the intestine and range of sizes.

No overt toxicities were noted in either wild type or APCMin/+ mice, and no adverse effects on cardiac function were observed in a detailed evaluation of SHetA2-treated wild type mice compared to untreated controls. It was important to evaluate cardiac toxicity, because this organ is especially dependent upon mitochondrial function, and SHetA2 causes mitochondrial swelling and loss of membrane potential in cancer cells (7). Although cardiac tissue is not cancerous, the high rate of mitochondrial respiration may cause similar mitochondrial sensitivity to that of cancer cells. The lack of cardiac toxicity is consistent with the resistance of mitochondria in normal cells to SHetA2 and suggests that mitochondrial defects in cancer cells involve more than just hyperactivity. Extensive preclinical evaluation of toxicity in 28-day toxicity models reported the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of SHetA2 to be 2000 mg/kg/day in rats and the NOAEL to be 1500 mg/kg/day in dogs (18). In the dog study, no toxicity of SHetA2 was seen in any tested dose groups. Thus, the doses used in this study, 30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg given 5 days/week, were well below the LOAEL and NOAEL.

The mechanism of SHetA2 chemoprevention activity includes inhibition of proliferation and angiogenesis and induction of apoptosis and differentiation as previously observed in studies of human cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo (1, 2, 4, 710, 1216). In this study, small intestinal polyps from both SHetA2-treatment groups exhibited reduced levels of the proliferation biomarkers, cyclin D1 and PCNA. Previous studies documented SHetA2-induction of G1 cell cycle arrest in both normal epithelial and endothelial cells and cancer cell lines (12, 13, 15). A mechanistic study in ovarian cancer cell lines demonstrated that this G1 arrest is caused by phosphorylation and ubiquitination of cyclin D1 leading to its degradation and down-stream effects on Rb phosphorylation and signal transduction, while overexpression of wild type or a degradation-resistant mutant of cyclin D1 attenuated SHetA2-induced G1 arrest (14). The reduction of cyclin D1 validates that this mechanism is associated with colorectal cancer chemoprevention and supports utilizing cyclin D1 as a pharmacodynamic endpoint in planned SHetA2 clinical trials.

The apoptotic activity of SHetA2 was also validated in biomarker analysis of polyps in this study. Similar to studies of ovarian, kidney and lung cancer cell lines, SHetA2 reduced levels of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein in colon polyps in this study (7, 9, 13). Tipping the balance further towards apoptosis, the pro-apoptotic Bax protein was elevated in the SHetA2-treatment groups in comparison to the untreated controls. This is in contrast to studies of human cancer cell lines treated with SHetA2 which found no up-regulation of Bax in ovarian and kidney cancer cell lines and, depending on the specific cell line, no effect or down regulation, of Bax in lung cancer cell lines (7, 9, 13). The inconsistency between upregulation of Bax levels in APCMin/+ polyps and no-effect to down-regulation in human cancer cell lines could be due to differences inherent to human in comparison to murine cells or due to differences inherent to in vitro human cancer cell lines in comparison to in vivo pre-neoplastic murine polyps. Regardless of the difference in Bax levels between the studies, the increase in the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio is consistent and is indicative of SHetA2-induction of apoptosis in the polyps. Further support for SHetA2 induction of apoptosis in the polyps is indicated by the induction of caspase 3 cleavage in polyps from the treated mice.

Induction of differentiation by SHetA2 was previously observed as formation of glands in organotypic cultures of human ovarian cancer cell lines and primary cultures of human ovarian cancer cells and as formation of tubules in organotypic cultures and xenografts of a human kidney cancer cell line in SHetA2-treated groups, but not in untreated control groups (1, 13). These differentiated structures were associated with induction of mucin-1 (Muc-1) in ovarian cancer cells and E-cadherin in kidney cancer cells (1, 13). In this study, elevated levels of E-cadherin protein were observed in polyps from SHetA2-treated mice in comparison to untreated controls. E-cadherin is a transmembrane protein expressed in epithelial cells that forms adherence junctions between cells by binding to other E-cadherin molecules on adjacent cells (30). Loss of E-cadherin expression is common in human colorectal tumors and is known to facilitate cell migration and invasion (31). Thus, up-regulation of E-cadherin by SHetA2 could contribute to reversal of the cancerous phenotype. The binding of E-cadherin proteins to each other is dependent upon calcium and on binding of the β-catenin protein to the intracellular domain of E-cadherin (30). When β-catenin is bound to E-cadherin at the inner plasma membrane, it mediates connection to the actin cytoskeleton, but upon reduction of E-cadherin, it is degraded (32). In situations common in colorectal cancer, namely altered APC or Wnt signaling, β-catenin accumulates in the cytoplasm and nucleus (32). Elevated levels of cytoplasmic and nuclear β-catenin are associated with tumor invasion and worse patient prognosis (3335). In the nucleus, β-catenin dimerizes with the lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF-1) transcription factor to regulate multiple genes including cyclin D1, which is upregulated by β-catenin/LEF-1 (36). Thus, the elevated levels of E-Cadherin in SHetA2-treated polyps could contribute to the reduced cyclin D1 levels by sequestering β-catenin on the cell membrane away from the nucleus where it would elevate cyclin D1 gene transcription.

Other beneficial effects of SHetA2 treatment observed were the reduction of COX-2 and VEGF proteins in small intestinal polyps. COX-2 has been targeted in the development of chemoprevention agents because it is overexpressed in most colorectal tumors in association with chronic inflammation and worse patient survival (37). VEGF is a pro-angiogenic cytokine commonly found elevated in cancer patients, which has prompted extensive development of cancer therapeutics targeted at the VEGF pathway (38). Elevated levels of COX-2 and VEGF are often co-expressed within the same colon tumor and associated with elevated lymphangiogenesis and worse patient prognosis (39, 40).

The two doses evaluated in this study, 30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg exerted similar levels of reductions on tumor incidence, however dose-dependent effects were observed for most of the biomarkers evaluated in polyp tissues. This difference may be due to dose-dependent effects being masked by the larger number of factors required to regulate tumor incidence in comparison to the lesser number of factors required to regulate levels of individual molecules. SHetA2 is a highly hydrophobic molecule and appears to have maximum limits of absorption in the colon (18). Suspension of SHetA2 in Solutol HS15 (now called Kolliphor HS15) has been shown to increase bioavailability of SHetA2 in comparison to suspension of SHetA2 in carboxymethylcellulose by about 10 fold (18). Thus, the doses and frequency of administration, in addition to lower than optimal formulation, may have caused poor bioavailability of SHetA2 in this study leading to blood levels that were too low to observe dose-dependent effects on the intestinal tissue. It is not known if the SHetA2 exposure in the intestine of mice could directly affect intestinal tumors without first being taken up into the blood stream.

In conclusion, oral administration of the small molecule Flex-Het, SHetA2, exerts significant chemoprevention activity without evidence of toxicity in an Apcmin/+ murine model of colon cancer. Detailed analysis of cardiac function of wild type littermates showed no evidence of cardiotoxicity at the highest dose used. The mechanism of chemoprevention is associated with reduction in levels of biomarkers of proliferation, differentiation and inflammation and induction of biomarkers of apoptosis. These results justify further evaluation of SHetA2 in clinical trials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Summer Frank in the Stephenson Cancer Center for Biostatistical Core for providing data entry, the OUHSC Rodent Barrier Facility Animal Housing staff for their help and the Kerley-Cade Endowment and NIH R01 HL102074 grant (to ZS) for funding.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • 1.Guruswamy S, Lightfoot S, Gold M, Hassan R, Berlin KD, Ivey RT, et al. Effects of retinoids on cancerous phenotype and apoptosis in organotypic culture of ovarian carcinoma. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2001;93:516–25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.7.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chun K-H, Benbrook DM, Berlin KD, Hong WK, Lotan R. Induction of apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines by heteroarotinoids through a mitochondrial dependent pathway. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3826–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu S, Brown CW, Berlin KD, Dhar A, Guruswamy S, Brown D, et al. Synthesis of Flexible Sulfur-Containing Heteroarotinoids That Induce Apoptosis and Reactive Oxygen Species with Discrimination between Malignant and Benign Cells. J Med Chem. 2004;47:999–1007. doi: 10.1021/jm030346v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Benbrook D, Kamelle S, Guruswamy S, Lightfoot S, Rutledge T, Gould N, et al. Flexible heteroarotinoids (Flex-Hets) exhibit improved therapeutic ratios as anti-cancer agents over retinoic acid receptor agonists. Inv New Drugs. 2005;23:417–28. doi: 10.1007/s10637-005-2901-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang Y, Hua Y, Benbrook DM, Covey JM, Dai G, Liu Z, et al. High performance liquid chromatographic analysis and preclinical pharmacokinetics of the heteroarotinoid antitumor agent, SHetA2. Cancer Chem Pharmacol. 2006;58:561–9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0211-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Le TC, Berlin KD, Benson SD, Eastman MA, Bell-Eunice G, Nelson AC, et al. Heteroarotinoids with anti-cancer activity against ovarian cancer cells. Open Med Chem J. 2007;1:11–23. doi: 10.2174/1874104500701010011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu T-Z, Hannafon B, Gill L, Kelly B, Benbrook DM. Flex-Hets differentially induce apoptosis in cancer over normal cells by directly targeting mitochondria. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:1814–22. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Benbrook DM, Lightfoot S, Ranger-Moore J, Liu T, Chengedza S, Berry WL, et al. Karyometric and Gene Expression Analysis in an Organotypic Model of Endometrial Carcinogenesis and Chemoprevention. Gene Reg Systems Biol. 2008;2:21–42. doi: 10.4137/grsb.s344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin Y, Liu X, Yue P, Benbrook DM, Berlin KD, Khuri FR, et al. Involvement of c-FLIP and survivin down-regulation in flexible heteroarotinoid-induced apoptosis and enhancement of TRAIL-initiated apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:3556–65. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lin Y-D, Chen S, Yue P, Zou W, Benbrook DM, Liu S, et al. CAAT/enhancer binding protein homologous protein-dependent death receptor 5 induction is a major component of SHetA2-induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5335–44. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu Z, Zhang Y, Hua YF, Covey JM, Benbrook DM, Chan KK. Metabolism of a sulfur-containing heteroarotionoid antitumor agent, SHetA2, using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rap Comm Mass Spec. 2008;22:3371–81. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Myers T, Chengedza S, Lightfoot S, Pan Y, Dedmond D, Cole L, et al. Flexible Heteroarotinoid (Flex-Het) SHetA2 inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Inv New Drugs. 2008;27:304–18. doi: 10.1007/s10637-008-9175-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu T, Masamha CP, Chengedza S, Berlin KD, Lightfoot S, He F, et al. Development of flexible-heteroarotinoids for kidney cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2009;8:1227–38. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Masamha CP, Benbrook DM. Cyclin D1 degradation is sufficient to induce G1 cell cycle arrest despite constitutive expression of cyclin E2 in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6565–72. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moxley KCS, Mangiaracina (Benbrook) D. Induction of death receptor ligand-mediated apoptosis in epithelial ovarian carcinoma: The search for sensitizing agents. Gyn Oncol. 2009;115:438–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chengedza S, Benbrook DM. NF-κB is involved in SHetA2 circumvention of TNF-α resistance, but not induction of intrinsic apoptosis. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2010;21:297–305. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283350e43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Doppalapudi RS, Riccio ES, Davis Z, Menda S, Wang A, Du N, et al. Genotoxicity of the cancer chemopreventive drug candidates CP-31398, SHetA2, and phospho-ibuprofen. Mutation Res. 2012;746:78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kabirov KK, Kapetanovic IM, Benbrook DM, Dinger N, Mankovskaya I, Zakharov A, et al. Oral toxicity and pharmacokinetic studies of SHetA2, a new chemopreventive agent, in rats and dogs. Drug Chem Tox. 2012;36:284–95. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2012.710632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cho KR, Vogelstein B. Genetic alterations in the adenoma--carcinoma sequence. Cancer. 1992;70:1727–31. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920915)70:4+<1727::aid-cncr2820701613>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ferguson LR. Recent advances in understanding of interactions between genes and diet in the etiology of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010;2:125–9. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i3.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM, Levy DB, et al. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science. 1991;253:661–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1651562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rowan AJ, Lamlum H, Ilyas M, Wheeler J, Straub J, Papadopoulou A, et al. APC mutations in sporadic colorectal tumors: A mutational “hotspot” and interdependence of the “two hits”. Proceedings of the Nat Acad Sci. 2000;97:3352–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Su LK, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Preisinger AC, Moser AR, Luongo C, et al. Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. [Erratum appears in Science 1992 May 22;256(5060):1114] Science. 1992;256:668–70. doi: 10.1126/science.1350108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rosenberg DW, Giardina C, Tanaka T. Mouse models for the study of colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:183–96. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Janakiram NB, Mohammed A, Qian L, Choi CI, Steele VE, Rao CV. Chemopreventive effects of RXR-selective rexinoid bexarotene on intestinal neoplasia of Apc(Min/+) mice. Neoplasia. 2012;14:159–68. doi: 10.1593/neo.111440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McAlpine CA, Barak Y, Matise I, Cormier RT. Intestinal-specific PPARγ deficiency enhances tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+ mice. International Journal of Cancer. 2006;119:2339–46. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Javid SH, Moran AE, Carothers AM, Redston M, Bertagnolli MM. Modulation of tumor formation and intestinal cell migration by estrogens in the Apc(Min/+) mouse model of colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:587–95. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barnes EL, Long MD. Colorectal cancer in women: hormone replacement therapy and chemoprevention. Climacteric. 2012;15:250–5. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2012.659450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tsanou E, Peschos D, Batistatou A, Charalabopoulos A, Charalabopoulos K. The E-Cadherin Adhesion Molecule and Colorectal Cancer. A Global Literature Approach. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:3815–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cavallaro U, Christofori G. Cell adhesion and signalling by cadherins and Ig-CAMs in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:118–32. doi: 10.1038/nrc1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gregorieff A, Clevers H. Wnt signaling in the intestinal epithelium: from endoderm to cancer. Genes Dev. 2005;19:877–90. doi: 10.1101/gad.1295405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Iwamoto M, Ahnen DJ, Franklin WA, Maltzman TH. Expression of β-catenin and full-length APC protein in normal and neoplastic colonic tissues. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1935–40. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.11.1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martinez NP, Kanno DT, Pereira JA, Cardinalli IA, Priolli DG. Beta-catenin and E-cadherin tissue “content” as prognostic markers in left-side colorectal cancer. Cancer Biomarkers: Sec A Dis Markers. 2010;8:129–35. doi: 10.3233/DMA-2011-0843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Norwood MG, Bailey N, Nanji M, Gillies RS, Nicholson A, Ubhi S, et al. Cytoplasmic beta-catenin accumulation is a good prognostic marker in upper and lower gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Histopath. 2010;57:101–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03587.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shtutman M, Zhurinsky J, Simcha I, Albanese C, D’Amico M, Pestell R, et al. The cyclin D1 gene is a target of the β-catenin/LEF-1 pathway. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1999;96:5522–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang D, Dubois RN. The role of COX-2 in intestinal inflammation and colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:781–8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Murukesh N, Dive C, Jayson GC. Biomarkers of angiogenesis and their role in the development of VEGF inhibitors. Brit J Cancer. 2010;102:8–18. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Soumaoro LT, Uetake H, Takagi Y, Iida S, Higuchi T, Yasuno M, et al. Coexpression of VEGF-C and Cox-2 in human colorectal cancer and its association with lymph node metastasis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2006;49:392–8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0247-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li X, Liu B, Xiao J, Yuan Y, Ma J, Zhang Y. Roles of VEGF-C and Smad4 in the lymphangiogenesis, lymphatic metastasis, and prognosis in colon cancer. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2011;15:2001–10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1627-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES