Abstract
Cryopreservation of rat sperm is very challenging due to its sensitivity to various stress factors. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal cooling rate and extender for epididymal sperm of outbred Sprague Dawley (SD) and inbred Fischer 344 (F344) rat strains. The epididymal sperm from 10–12 weeks old sexually mature SD and F344 strains were suspended in five different freezing extenders, namely HEPES buffered Tyrode’s lactate (TL-HEPES), modified Kreb’s Ringer bicarbonate (mKRB), 3% dehydrated skim milk (SM), Salamon’s Tris-citrate (TRIS), and tes/tris (TES). All extenders contained 20% egg yolk, 0.75% Equex Paste and 0.1 M raffinose or 0.1 M sucrose. The sperm samples in each extender were cooled to 4°C and held for 45 min for equilibration before freezing. The equilibrated sperm samples in each extender were placed onto a shallow quartz dish inserted into Linkam Cryostage (BCS 196). The samples were then cooled to a final temperature of −150 °C by using various cooling rates (10, 40, 70, and 100 °C/min). For thawing, the quartz dish containing the sperm samples were rapidly removed from the Linkam cryo-stage and placed on a 37 °C slide warmer and held for 1 min before motility analysis. Sperm membrane and acrosomal integrity and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) were assessed by SYBR-14/Propidium iodide, Alexa Fluor-488-PNA conjugate and JC-1, respectively. The total motility, acrosomal integrity, membrane integrity and MMP values were compared among cooling rates and extenders. Both cooling rate and type of extender had significant effect on cryosurvival (P<0.05). Sperm motility increased as cooling rate was increased for both strains (P<0.05). Highest cryosurvival was achieved when 100 °C/min cooling rate was used in combination with TES extender containing 20% egg yolk, 0.75% Equex paste and either 0.1 M sucrose or raffinose (P < 0.05). This study showed that TES extender containing 0.1 M raffinose or sucrose with 70 °C /min and 100 °C /min cooling rate improved post-thaw motility of rat sperm.
Keywords: cooling rate, extenders, freezing, rat sperm
Introduction
Cryobanking of reproductive cells and tissues provide benefits for agriculture, animal husbandry programs, human infertility treatments and biomedical research [16]. Rats are commonly used laboratory animals for biomedical and genomic research [28,49]. Molecular and cellular biology techniques have allowed production of thousands of new strains of laboratory animals and this process is expected to accelerate in the future. However, maintenance of live colony is costly and sometimes difficult. Cryopreservation of germplasm circumvents the need for maintenance of live colony and genetic material would still be available for future use. In addition, up to now, many inbred mutant and genetically modified rat strains have not been readily available to investigators around the world [1,28,31,49]. Cryobanking of embryos, sperm, oocytes are becoming very important both for reducing the maintenance cost and improving distribution of strains [1,36]. Cryopreservation of sperm provides a simpler and more economical alternative to cryopreservation of embryos, and reduces the cost and space needed for keeping a large number of rat strains having a single mutation [1,35].
Sperm preservation protocols vary among species due to their inherent characteristics. There are marked species differences in spermatozoa size and morphology. In addition, there are also more subtle differences in membrane phospholipid composition and metabolism of spermatozoa [6]. Rat sperm are known to have extreme sensitivity to suboptimal conditions such as centrifugation, pipetting, chilling, osmotic stress [34,46,51] freezing and thawing [25,34,35] possibly due to unusually long tail, head shape and membrane composition [12,20,24]. Thus, acceptable and repeatable rat sperm cryopreservation protocol has not been achieved [57].
Post-thaw sperm quality is still unsatisfactory for intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization in rats with genetic modifications [34,57]. Despite species variation, there are common stages to any sperm freezing protocol. All protocols involve sperm collection and extension, addition of cryoprotective agents (CPA) and cooling above 0 °C, freezing below 0 °C, storage and thawing [11]. During all of these stages, spermatozoa are exposed a number of potentially damaging stresses such as the change in temperature, osmotic and toxic stresses presented by exposure to high molar concentrations of CPA and the formation and dissolution of ice crystals in the extracellular space [54]. Success of cryopreservation depends on sperm endurance to these insults [45,54]. Extenders, CPA, optimal cooling and thawing rates play important role for successful cryopreservation of sperm [10,20,30,42]. Extender composition and cooling rate have significant effects on sperm viability and there is a strong interaction between extender and cooling rate [55]. If the cooling rate is slower or faster than optimum cooling rate, this may cause irreversible damage to sperm [13,27,29]. An optimum cooling rate must be slow enough to permit water to leave the cells to avoid intracellular ice formation, and fast enough to avoid severe cell dehydration and cryo-injury due to the solution effect [29]. The optimal cooling rate is different among species and which was between 76 and 140°C/min in bull [55], 30°C /min in boar [13], 27°C to 130 °C /min in mouse [27] and 10°C/min in human [21]. But there is no published study that determined the optimal cooling rate of rat sperm.
Determination of optimal extender composition for various species has enabled development of better cryopreservation protocols [14,38,53]. An ideal sperm extender should have optimum pH, buffering capacity, suitable osmotic pressure and protect sperm against cold shock [45]. The solutions of Tris-citrate-EY, skim milk-EY, lactose-EY and Tris-TES are the most commonly used sperm extenders [56]. Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (mKRB) solution containing raffinose, 0.75% Equex STM, 0.05% sodium dodecly sulfate (SDS) and EY greatly enhanced the cryosurvival of rat sperm [57]. The use of EY reduces chilling injury to sperm in many mammalian species [38]. In a recent study [51], we found that the addition of 20% lactose-egg yolk (LEY) into extenders reduced motility loss after chilling. In addition, various SDS-based products improve the effectiveness of EY during sperm freezing for several mammalian species including mouse [40], rat [34], cat [5], dog [39] and pig [8]. Equex Paste (EP) and Orvus ES Paste are the commercial forms of SDS which is a water-soluble anionic detergent. Equex Paste is used for horse and swine sperm cryopreservation. Equex Paste with EY has more protective effect against freezing damage and cold shock [41] due to increase of protective activity of EY by changing the structure of lipoproteins of egg yolk [4].
Many previous reports suggest that sperm from different species respond differently to chilling, CPA, and extenders [2,17,31,44,51]. The addition of permeating CPA (e.g. glycerol) and non-permeating sugars (e.g. sucrose, raffinose and trehalose) to extenders has been effective for cryopreservation of sperm from various mammalian species [3,4]. Glycerol is the most common CPA used for freezing sperm from various species [42,45]. However, addition of glycerol to extenders was found to be detrimental to mouse sperm [26] and not effective for rat sperm freezing [34] .-Furthermore, many reports suggested that raffinose is an effective CPA for mouse and rat [25,26,32,33,37,57]. For successful cryopreservation, careful selection of extender as well as an appropriate CPA that works well with the chosen extender to maintain high sperm motility after freezing is necessary [51]. In this study we performed series of experiments to determine appropriate CPA, extender and cooling rate to improve post thaw rat sperm viability.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated.
Animals
10 to 12 weeks old SD and Fisher 344 (F344) rats were used as sperm donors. The rats were housed in accordance with the policies of the University of Missouri Animal Care and Use Committee and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Rats were housed in conventional rat cages at 23–24 °C in a controlled light environment (10 h dark/14 h light) and provided free access to water and standard rodent chow.
Sperm collection
Rats were humanely euthanized by CO2 inhalation, cauda epididymides were excised and placed in a 35-mm culture dish containing 3 ml HEPES buffered Tyrode’s lactate (TL-HEPES) solution supplemented with 3 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (fraction V). The cauda epididymides were dissected with fine scissors to allow sperm to swim out for 10 to 15 min at 22 °C. The sperm suspension was gently drawn into a plastic transfer pipette (inner diameter, 2 mm; Samco, San Fernando, CA) and placed in a 5ml tube for further experimentation. The sperm samples were held at 22°C in test tubes and were used for further experimentations. The final concentrations of sperm samples were about 20–30×106 sperm/ml. Each experiment was performed by using a sample from a single donor and was repeated 6 times. Thus total of 6 rats per rat strain were used in the experiments.
Preparation of sperm extenders
Five different base extenders namely HEPES buffered Tyrode’s lactate (TL-HEPES), Modified Kreb’s Ringer bicarbonate (mKRB), Skim milk (SM), Tris-citrate (TRIS) and TES were used.
TL-HEPES
TL-HEPES contained 114 mM NaCL, 3.2 mM KCl, 2 mM NaHCO3, 0.4 mM NaH2PO4H2O, 10 mM Lactic Acid, 2 mM CaCl22H2O, 0.5 mM MgCL26H2O, 10 mM Hepes, 10 ml/L Penicilln/Streptomycin (10 mg streptomycin and 10,000 U penicillin in 1 mL). Bovine serum albumin (BSA; 3 mg/mL) fraction V and 0.1 M sucrose were added to obtain final freezing extender.
mKRB
The mKRB solution was basically the same as that was developed and used by Toyoda and Chang (50) except phenol red and BSA was not included. The modified Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer contained 94.6 mM NaCl, 4.78 mM KCl, 1.71 mM CaCl2.2H2O, 1.19 mM MgSO4.7H2O, 1.19 mM KH2PO4, 25.07 mM NaHCO3, 21.58 mM sodium lactate, 0.5 mM sodium pyruvate, 5.56 mM glucose, 10 ml/L Penicillin/Streptomycin. The mKRB media was equilibrated in 5% CO2 in air at 37 °C at least 5 hours before use. To obtain freezing extender, 0.1 M raffinose was added to the mKRB.
SM
The SM extender was prepared by dissolving 3% (w/v) dehydrated skim milk (Difco 0032-17-3, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and 0.1 M sucrose in TL-HEPES without NaCl. The mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was filtered through 0.45 µm filter to obtain a final working extender.
TRIS
The TRIS extender contained 27.0 g/l tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (TRISMA Base, catalog no: T6066, Sigma, USA), 14.0 g/l citric acid and 10.0 g/l fructose [45]. To obtain freezing extender either 0.1 M sucrose (TRIS-S) or 0.1 M raffinose (TRIS-R) was added.
TES
The TES base solution consisted of 15.7 g/l N-[Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (TES, catalog no: T5691, Sigma, USA) and 8.2 g/l Tris. To obtain freezing extender either 0.1 M sucrose (TES-S) or 0.1 M raffinose (TES-R) was added.
The pH and osmolality of each extender was adjusted to approximately 7.4 and 300–400 mOsm, respectively. Egg yolk (20%; v/v) was added to the each extender and mixed by placing the tube to an orbital shaker for 10 min and centrifuged at 15.000 g for 60 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter. Egg yolk phospholipids were then solubilized by adding 0.75% (v/v) Equex-Paste (Minitüb, Tiefenbach, Germany) to the extender.
Freezing and Thawing
Sperm samples (100 µl) from SD or F344 were transferred into 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes containing 400 µl of each freezing extender and gently mixed by inverting the tube. After dilution, motility analysis was performed using a phase contrast microscopy equipped with 20X objective. The sperm samples were then equilibrated at 4°C for 45 min. After equilibration in the extenders, 150 µl sperm sample from each extender was placed onto a shallow quartz dish (14 mm inner diameter and 2.56 mm deep) and covered with a round coverslip and then inserted into Linkam cryostage (TMS- 94) that was mounted on a Nikon microscope. The samples were then cooled by using various cooling rates (10, 40, 70 and 100 °C/min) to final temperature of −150 °C. For thawing, the quartz dish containing the sperm samples was rapidly removed from the Linkam cryostage and placed on a 37 °C slide warmer in order to have direct contact with the warm surface to achieve about 1000 °C/min warming rate. After warming, motility analysis was performed and the samples were transferred into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes containing 150 µL TL-HEPES base solution. All samples were underwent mitochondrial, acrosome and membrane integrity assessment.
Evaluation of sperm plasma membrane and acrosomal integrity
SYBR-14/Propidium iodide (Live/Dead sperm viability kit, catalog no: L-7011, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and Alexa Fluor-488-PNA (catalog no: L-21409, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) conjugate were used to determine rat sperm plasma membrane and acrosome integrity, respectively. For plasma membrane integrity, 200 µl TL-HEPES solution was gently added to the tube containing 100 µl thawed sperm (1–2×106 spermatozoa/ml). Diluted sperm samples were incubated with 5 µL PI (0.5 µM final concentration) and 10 µL (0.4 µM final concentration) SYBR-14 at 37 °C for 10 minutes. After staining, 10 µl of sperm sample was placed on a microscope slide, covered with a coverslip and observed under the epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 600 using a dual fluorescence filter). The images of stained sperm samples were classified into 2 groups: sperm head displaying green fluorescence was considered to be membrane intact, whereas sperm displaying red fluorescence in the head was considered to be damaged membrane. 100 sperm per sample were counted.
To evaluate sperm acrosomal integrity, thawed sperm samples were washed to remove freezing extender. After thawing, 100 µl sperm sample centrifuged at 200xg for 3 min than the supernatant was removed and 320 µl TL-HEPES was added to the tube containing the sperm pellet to resuspend the sperm pellet by gentle rotation of the tube) 10 µl (1–2×106 spermatozoa/ml) washed sperm sample was smeared onto microscope slide and air-dried. The specimens were fixed with 99% methanol and kept at room temperature until fluorescence staining. For staining, slides were incubated with 20 µg/ml Alexa Fluor-488-PNA (peanut agglutinin) at 37 °C for 30 min, washed with PBS, and analyzed by using epifluorescent microscopy with an appropriate filter. The images of stained sperm samples were classified into 2 groups: Sperm displaying intensive and moderate bright fluorescence in the acrosomal region were considered to be intact, whereas sperm displaying weak, patchy, or no fluorescence in the acrosomal region were considered to be damaged. 100 sperm on each slide were evaluated to determine the proportion of sperm with intact acrosomes.
Evaluation of sperm mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP)
The sperm MMP was evaluated using the JC-1 fluorescent dye (M34152, Molecular Probes Inc.) by the modified method that was previously described by Guthrie and Welch [18]. The JC-1 fluorescent dye was used to distinguish spermatozoa with poorly and highly functional mitochondria. In poorly functional mitochondria, JC-1 remains in the monomeric state and fluoresces green. However, in highly functional mitochondria, JC-1 forms aggregates that fluoresce orange. For evaluation of MMP in spermatozoa, 300 µl the washed (prepared before acrosomal integrity analysis) sperm suspensions (1–2×106 spermatozoa/ml) were mixed with 10 µl JC-1 (0.75 µg final concentration). The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and then 100 sperm per sample were analyzed by using epifluorescent microscope with a dual fluorescence filter (Nikon Eclipse 600).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 11.5 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The data were analyzed to determine the effects of extenders and freezing rate on motility, membrane and acrosome plasma integrity and MMP. Parametric data were analyzed by analysis of variance (Two-Way ANOVA) and if there were significant differences, Tukey test for multiple comparisons was used for post hoc analysis. The non-parametric data were analyzed Kruskal-Wallis and if there were significant differences between groups, Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the differences in groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Values were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Results
Most of the extenders tested were effective in maintaining motility after equilibration. Motility of diluted, equilibrated and frozen-thawed SD rat sperm for different extenders and cooling rates are given in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. Fresh and diluted sperm motility before equilibration was between 60.0% and 76.7 for SD rats. Equilibration caused less than 10% motility loss in sperm samples diluted in extenders with the exception of m-KRB in 40 °C/min group. After freezing, sperm motility ranged between 3.7% and 32.5% (p<0.05). Sperm samples that were frozen in TES-S extender retained the highest motility (32.5%) at 100 °C/min cooling rate (p<0.05). Sperm samples frozen in TL-HEPES at 10 °C/min cooling rate resulted in the lowest motility (3.7%; p<0.05). The cooling rate significantly affected sperm motility recovery in TL-HEPES, m-KRB and TES-R treatment groups (p<0.05). Sperm motility was significantly decreased in 10 °C/min cooling rate compared to 100 °C/min cooling rate and sperm motility increased as cooling rate increased.
Table 1.
Percent motility of Sprague Dawley rat sperm diluted in different extenders.
| Groups | Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 74.2±2.0c | 70.0±1.3bc | 60.0±2.6a | 63.3±2.1ab | 65.8±2.0abc | 68.3±1.7abc | 63.3±2.1ab | 61.7±1.7ab |
| 40 °C/min | 73.3±3.3a | 66.6±3.1a | 69.2±4.0a | 68.3±3.8a | 65.0±3.2a | 65.8±2.0a | 65.0±3.4a | 63.3±2.1a |
| 70 °C/min | 75.0±2.2c | 65.0±2.2ab | 61.7±3.0ab | 66.7±2.1abc | 68.3±1.7bc | 63.3±2.1ab | 61.7±1.7ab | 58.3±1.7a |
| 100 °C/min | 76.7±2.1b | 66.6±4.0ab | 65.8±2.0ab | 70.0±0.0b | 66.7±2.1ab | 65.0±3.4ab | 63.3±2.1ab | 61.7±1.7a |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Table 2.
Percent motility of Sprague Dawley rat sperm equilibrated in different extenders.
| Groups | Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 74.2±2.0c | 65.0±3.4bc | 55.0±2.2a | 60.0±2.6a | 60.0±2.6a | 63.3±2.1bc | 60.0±2.6a | 58.3±1.7a |
| 40 °C/min | 73.3±3.3c | 63.3±3.3bc | 48.3±3.1a | 58.3±1.7b | 61.7±1.7b | 61.7±3.1b | 58.3±1.7b | 60.0±0.1b |
| 70 °C/min | 75.0±2.2c | 60.0±2.6a | 58.3±3.1a | 65.0±2.2ab | 63.3±2.1a | 65.0±2.2ab | 61.7±1.7a | 56.7±2.1a |
| 100 °C/min | 76.7±2.1b | 60.0±4.5ab | 56.7±4.2a | 60.0±5.2ab | 61.7±4.8ab | 61.7±4.8ab | 56.7±4.2a | 58.3±1.7ab |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05).
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05)
Table 3.
Percent post-thaw motility of Sprague Dawley rat sperm in different extenders and cooling rates.
| Cooling Rates |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 74.2±2.0d | 3.7±0.9a | 6.7±1.1ab | 10.8±2.4abc | 11.7±3.8abc | 9.2±0.8ab | 17.5±3.1bc | 21.7±3.8c |
| 40 °C/min | 73.3±3.3c | 6.3±1.7a | 12.5±2.8ab | 20.8±3.3b | 12.8±3.8ab | 15.8±4.9ab | 25.0±2.2b | 23.3±1.7b |
| 70 °C/min | 75.0±2.2d | 6.6±1.1a | 16.7±1.7ab | 16.7±2.1ab | 19.1±3.2bc | 19.2±3.3bc | 30.0±2.9c | 27.5±3.6bc |
| 100 °C/min | 76.7±2.1d | 10.0±1.8a | 15.8±2.0a | 19.2±2.7ab | 21.7±2.1abc | 22.5±5.3abc | 31.7±1.7bc | 32.5±3.1c |
| Significance | - | * | * | - | - | - | * | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Differences between the same columns are significant (P<0.05)
Membrane integrity, acrosomal integrity and MMP of frozen-thawed SD rat sperm are shown in Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6, respectively. Post-thaw membrane integrity ranged between 7.5% and 22.3% (p<0.05). The SM, TES-R and TES-S extenders were superior for maintaining membrane integrity in sperm frozen (p<0.05). Sperm acrosome integrity was not different among the extenders and cooling rates (p>0.05). However, the cryopreservation caused disruption in MMP compared to fresh sperm (p<0.05) in SD rat sperm.
Table 4.
Percent post-thaw plasma membrane integrity of Sprague–Dawley rat sperm using various cooling rates and freezing extenders.
| Cooling Rates |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 59.6±1.9c | 7.5±1.1a | 9.7±1.3ab | 14.7±2.4ab | 9.8±1.9ab | 8.7±1.7a | 14.2±2.2ab | 17.0±1.7b |
| 40 °C/min | 55.5±3.3b | 12.3±2.6a | 15.0±2.0a | 22.3±2.1a | 13.2±3.6a | 17.3±2.9a | 16.5±2.2a | 17.3±1.2a |
| 70 °C/min | 59.0±2.7b | 13.3±1.9a | 16.8±2.0a | 15.3±2.6a | 14.0±1.7a | 13.2±1.4a | 18.2±1.5a | 18.7±1.8a |
| 100 °C/min | 61.5±2.1c | 11.5±1.9a | 13.2±2.7ab | 16.2±1.7ab | 16.2±1.6ab | 16.0±2.1ab | 21.2±1.6b | 21.2±1.4b |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | * | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05)
Differences between the same columns are significant (P<0.05).
Table 5.
Percent post-thaw acrosome integrity of Sprague–Dawley rat sperm using various cooling rates and freezing extenders.
| Cooling Rates |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 76.2±2.9b | 23.3±3.7a | 26.3±3.6a | 22.2±3.6a | 26.5±4.4a | 29.0±4.6a | 25.0±5.0a | 27.3±3.4a |
| 40 °C/min | 76.0±6.1b | 24.0±4.0a | 26.2±3.5a | 25.3±3.3a | 27.7±2.8a | 32.2±3.4a | 27.3±3.6a | 29.7±4.5a |
| 70 °C/min | 76.3±5.7b | 23.3±3.7a | 26.8±4.2a | 21.2±2.2a | 24.5±3.1a | 25.5±4.8a | 26.8±3.2a | 26.2±4.5a |
| 100 °C/min | 74.3±4.6b | 25.0±3.3a | 26.3±3.9a | 23.3±3.7a | 24.7±3.7a | 26.8±3.5a | 27.0±4.1a | 27.8±4.4a |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the within the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Table 6.
Percent post-thaw mitochondrial membrane integrity of Sprague–Dawley rat sperm using various cooling rates and freezing extenders.
| Cooling Rates |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 52.6±3.0c | 3.0±0.8a | 2.5±0.5a | 4.5±0.8ab | 4.5±1.2ab | 4.0±0.9ab | 5.7±0.8b | 5.8±0.7b |
| 40 °C/min | 45.5±5.6c | 2.5±0.5a | 2.5±0.3a | 4.7±0.8ab | 5.0±1.5ab | 5.3±0.7b | 3.3±0.4a | 4.3±0.4ab |
| 70 °C/min | 50.8±3.0d | 2.3±0.6a | 4.2±0.9ab | 4.3±0.4ab | 4.8±0.7bc | 4.7±1.0bc | 4.3±0.8ab | 5.3±0.8c |
| 100 °C/min | 52.8±3.0c | 2.3±0.2a | 2.0±0.7a | 5.5±0.4b | 4.2±1.0ab | 4.1±1.1ab | 4.2±0.7ab | 3.3±0.7a |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Motility of diluted, equilibrated and frozen-thawed F344 rat sperm for different extenders and cooling rates are given in Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9. Sperm motility after dilution ranged between 58.3% and 75.8% for the extenders tested. After equilibration, sperm motility loss was under 10% for all extenders. Freezing and thawing processes resulted in 27.5% for TES-S extender at 100°C/min cooling rate and 54.2 % for TRIS-R extender at 10°C/min cooling rate loss in total motility. The highest sperm motility was observed in TES-R extender (33.3%) while the lowest motility was detected in TL-HEPES extender (3.2%) at 10 °C/min cooling rate (p<0.05). The cooling rate significantly affected motility recovery (p<0.05) and the highest motility was achieved in sperm exposed to TES-R and TES-S extenders at 70 °C/min and 100 °C/min cooling rates. Lower cooling rates were highly detrimental to motility (p<0.05).
Table 7.
Percent motility of F344 rat sperm diluted different extenders.
| Groups | Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 71.7±3.1b | 66.6±3.3ab | 61.7±1.7a | 63.3±2.1ab | 61.7±1.7a | 60.0±2.6a | 60.0±2.6a | 58.3±3.1a |
| 40 °C/min | 71.7±3.1a | 70.0±2.6a | 65.0±2.2a | 66.7±2.1a | 65.0±2.2a | 66.7±2.1a | 63.3±2.1a | 63.3±3.3a |
| 70 °C/min | 74.2±2.0b | 68.3±1.7ab | 65.0±2.2ab | 65.0±2.2ab | 63.3±2.1a | 61.7±3.1a | 61.7±1.7a | 61.7±3.1a |
| 100 °C/min | 75.8±2.0b | 66.7±3.3ab | 61.7±1.7a | 63.3±2.1a | 65.0±2.2ab | 61.7±3.1a | 61.7±3.1a | 60.0±3.7a |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Table 8.
Percent motility of F344 rat sperm equilibrated in different extenders.
| Groups | Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 71.7±3.1b | 61.7±3.1ab | 53.3±4.2a | 55.0±2.2a | 58.3±1.7a | 60.0±2.6a | 55.0±3.4a | 56.7±2.1a |
| 40 °C/min | 71.7±3.1c | 68.3±1.7bc | 55.8±3.3a | 60.0±2.6abc | 61.7±3.1abc | 58.3±1.7ab | 61.7±1.7abc | 56.7±3.3ab |
| 70 °C/min | 74.2±2.0b | 66.7±2.1ab | 58.3±3.1a | 61.7±1.7a | 61.7±1.7a | 60.0±2.6a | 60.0±0.0a | 60.0±2.6a |
| 100 °C/min | 75.8±2.0b | 61.7±3.1a | 51.7±4.0a | 55.0±2.2a | 63.3±2.1ab | 61.7±3.1a | 56.7±4.2a | 55.0±2.2a |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05)
Table 9.
Percent post-thaw motility of F344 rat sperm in different extenders and cooling rates.
| Cooling Rate |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 74.2±2.0d | 3.2±0.8a, | 9.2±1.5ab | 11.7±2.1abc | 7.5±1.1ab | 13.3±1.7bc | 19.2±2.7c | 15.0±2.6bc |
| 40 °C/min | 71.7±3.1c | 4.7±1.8a | 14.2±2.7ab | 14.2±2.0ab | 15.0±2.6ab | 14.2±3.5ab | 25.0±2.2b | 21.7±3.1b |
| 70 °C/min | 74.2±2.0c | 9.3±0.9a | 15.0±1.8a | 18.3±1.1a | 15.0±3.7a | 9.2±2.0a | 33.3±2.5b | 30.0±2.6b |
| 100 °C/min | 75.8±2.0d | 8.3±1.1a | 15.0±3.2b | 15.0±1.3b | 14.2±3.7ab | 11.7±3.6ab | 29.2±0.8c | 32.5±3.1c |
| Significance | - | * | - | * | - | - | * | * |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Differences between the same columns are significant (P<0.05)
Membrane and acrosome integrity and MMP of frozen-thawed F344 rat sperm for different extenders and cooling rates are given in Table 10, Table 11 and Table 12, respectively. Membrane integrity after freezing and thawing processes were between 8.8% (for TRIS-S, at 100°C/min cooling rate) and 21.3% (for TES-S, at 70°C/min cooling rate; p<0.05). Post-thaw membrane integrity was lower than motility except for TL-HEPES. Sperm acrosome integrity was not affected significantly from the extenders or cooling rates (p>0.05). But cryopreservation procedure caused the greatest disruption in MMP (p<0.05) in F344 rat sperm. The sperm that was frozen in TES supplemented with EY, Equex Paste and sucrose or raffinose retained highest motility (p<0.05). The strain differences in sperm motility, membrane integrity, acrosome integrity and MMP were not detected between SD and F344.
Table 10.
Percent post-thaw plasma membrane integrity of F344 rat sperm using various cooling rates and freezing extenders.
| Cooling Rates |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 59.5±1.3b | 9.3±1.9a | 13.0±2.0a | 15.2±1.7a | 10.8±1.3a | 12.8±2.1a | 17.0±1.2a | 13.0±1.0a |
| 40 °C/min | 58.0±3.2b | 9.3±2.7a | 16.8±1.9a | 16.0±2.0a | 14.0±1.7a | 17.3±2.4a | 17.8±1.2a | 18.8±2.8a |
| 70 °C/min | 56.0±3.0c | 12.5±1.9a | 15.3±1.6ab | 20.2±0.9ab | 12.0±1.2a | 15.8±2.1ab | 19.3±1.3ab | 21.3±2.5b |
| 100 °C/min | 60.2±2.4c | 11.3±1.1ab | 12.7±2.0ab | 15.0±2.0ab | 11.3±2.3ab | 8.8±2.2a | 15.2±1.6ab | 18.0±1.2b |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Table 11.
Percent post-thaw acrosome integrity of F344 rat sperm using various cooling rates and freezing extenders.
| Cooling Rates |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 66.5±6.8b | 18.5±3.1a | 18.8±2.2a | 19.7±2.1a | 21.3±2.3a | 26.8±3.5a | 20.3±2.7a | 24.3±2.6a |
| 40 °C/min | 68.7±7.8b | 25.3±5.6a | 23.2±2.9a | 23.7±2.9a | 25.0±3.7a | 32.2±4.9a | 23.2±3.0a | 24.5±2.7a |
| 70 °C/min | 78.5±4.4b | 32.0±5.0a | 30.7±3.2a | 29.8±2.7a | 19.5±1.3a | 23.3±5.0a | 24.0±3.5a< | 25.0±2.1a |
| 100 °C/min | 68.7±3.8b | 25.7±3.8a | 29.3±1.0a | 29.8±2.4a | 25.0±2.4a | 28.2±3.0a | 30.0±3.2a | 27.3±2.6a |
| Significance | - | - | - | * | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significan t differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05)
Differences between the same columns are significant (P<0.05).
Table 12.
Percent post-thaw mitochondrial membrane integrity of F344 rat sperm using various cooling rates and freezing extenders.
| Cooling Rates |
Fresh Sperm |
TL- HEPES |
m-KRB | SM | TRIS-R | TRIS-S | TES-R | TES-S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C/min | 42.2±3.4c | 1.7±0.2a | 3.7±0.6ab | 4.2±1.3ab | 3.8±0.9ab | 3.5±0.7a | 5.7±0.6b | 5.0±1.2b |
| 40 °C/min | 44.2±4.0b | 3.2±0.7a | 4.7±1.0a | 4.8±1.2a | 3.2±0.5a | 3.3±0.7a | 4.5±0.9a | 4.0±0.8a |
| 70 °C/min | 44.7±2.8b | 4.0±0.6a | 4.5±1.1a | 4.3±1.1a | 4.7±1.1a | 3.3±0.7a | 4.8±1.3a | 4.7±1.1a |
| 100 °C/min | 45.3±4.1b | 3.7±0.8a | 4.7±1.4a | 5.8±1.2a | 4.0±0.9a | 3.7±1.0a | 5.7±1.2a | 5.2±1.2a |
| Significance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Values are mean percentages ± SEM (n = 6)
Different superscripts within the same row denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Differences between the same columns are not significant (P>0.05).
Discussions
In general, damage to sperm during cryopreservation have been attributed to several factors including cold shock, freezing injury, oxidative stress, alterations in membrane compositions, chemical toxicity of CPA, and osmotic stress [9]. In order to develop an optimized rat sperm freezing procedure, we studied optimal cooling rate in various sperm extenders. A simple and effective freezing medium consisting of 18% raffinose and 3% skim milk without any permeating CPA has been successfully used to cryopreserve sperm from many inbred and outbred mouse strains [33,48]. One of the interesting findings of the current study is that, in contrast to its effectiveness for mouse sperm, skim milk was not effective in protecting rat sperm from freezing injury, even sperm from very closely related species (i.e. rats and mice) have their specific cryobiologic characteristics and emphasized the importance of developing species-specific freezing protocols.
Compared to mouse sperm [33,48], there have been little success in freezing rat sperm [22,23,34,57,58]. Yamashiro et al. (57) reported higher (39.3%) post-thaw motility for epididymal rat sperm in mKRB containing 0.1 M raffinose, 0.75% Equex STM and 20% EY. It has been widely reported that non-permeating CPAs are more effective than permeating CPAs for both rat and mouse sperm freezing [25,26,32,33,37,57]. The current study also showed that freezing extender containing 0.1 M raffinose provided good cryoprotection for rat sperm. In addition, while the protective effect of non-permeating CPAs against cooling [51] was reported, few studies showed ineffectiveness of permeating CPA, glycerol, during rat sperm cryopreservation [34,57].
In our previous study, TL-HEPES, SM, Lactose, Tris and TES extenders served as good extenders but SM was not effective against chilling injury [51]. On the other hand, extender containing SM and 0.1 M raffinose in this study was effective against chilling injury, but it was ineffective during freezing. Cryopreservation in extender containing 0.1 M raffinose or 0.1 M sucrose prepared in TES medium with 0.75% Equex-Paste and 20% egg yolk significantly improved the sperm motility compared to TL-HEPES and m-KRB for both SD and F344 strains. Yamashiro et al. (57) found that cryopreserving Wistar rat sperm in m-KRB provided better recovery of motility (39.3%) and acrosome (89.3%) integrity. Sperm cryopreserved in mKRB in this current study had lower motility (16.7% and 15.0% for F344 and SD rats). However, in a recent study, Yamashiro et al. (58) reported lower post-thaw sperm motility (21.5%) when m-KRB was used as an extender. These inconsistencies in post-thaw sperm characteristics in epididymal rat sperm may be attributed to 1) uncontrolled cooling rate 2) lack of optimal sperm extender components and 3) suboptimal handling throughout the cryopreservation procedure. For example although mouse sperm freezing protocol developed by Nakagata et al. [3], has been universally used to cryobank sperm from thousands of mouse strains, there are still undetermined aspects of the freezing protocol that can lead to significant differences in outcome.
Medium composition and cooling rate have significant effects on sperm survival and the interaction between medium and cooling rate was previously observed [55]. To date, freezing extender containing 23% (v/v) egg yolk, 8% (w/v) lactose monohydrate has been most commonly used extender used to cryopreserve rat sperm [34]. All of these previous studies cooled straws containing rat sperm by holding 2 cm above the liquid nitrogen level (at −150 to −170 °C) for 10–15 min before plunging into LN2 [34,56,57,58]. However, they did not report exact cooling rates. To date there has been only one fundamental cryobiologic study investigating optimal cooling rate for rat sperm. Hagiwara et al. [19] evaluated the biophysics (membrane permeability) of rat sperm to better understand the cooling rate response that contributes to cryopreservation success. A differential scanning calorimeter studies predicted and experimentally tested optimal cooling rates that ranged from 53 °C/min to 70 °C /min for rat sperm. Maximum motility was obtained with cooling rates between 50 °C /min and 80 °C /min.
This is one of the first studies which aimed at determining optimal cooling rate using a Linkam Cryostage. Optimal cooling rate varies from species to species. It has been shown for mouse sperm that cryo-survival is depended significantly on the cooling rate, and less strongly associated with the warming rates as long as rapid warming (∼1000 °C/min) is used. In this study we also used the rapid warming (∼1000 °C/min). Cooling rate significantly affected post-thaw motility of SD sperm in TL-HEPES, m-KRB and TES-R extenders and motility of F344 sperm in TL-HEPES, SM, TES-R and TES-S extenders. In these extenders, post-thaw motility decreased significantly in 10 °C/min cooling rate compared to 100 °C/min cooling rate. The highest motility was obtained when rat sperm was cooled between 40°C/min and 100°C/min. This is consistent with the previous report from Hagiwara et al. [19] in that maximum motility was obtained with cooling rates between 50 °C /min and 80 °C /min. In this study we did not investigate cooling rate higher than 100°C/min because of the limitation of Linkam cooling stage. Most commonly used cooling machines in laboratories cannot reach controlled cooling rate of 100 °C/min and above. It is accepted that constant cooling of rat sperm cannot be achieved in LN2 which cools sperm between 100–130 °C/ min. Stacy et al. [47] has elegantly demonstrated low reproducibility of freezing protocols due mainly to variation in cooling rate in LN2 vapor. For mouse sperm, cooling rate of 114°C/min resulted in higher motility than cooling rate of 39°C/min but, cooling rate of 192°C/min led to the lowest motility [47]. Similarly, Koshimoto and Mazur [27] showed that cooling rate between 27 and 130°C/min resulted in more motile sperm compared to the lower or higher rates.
In this study, freezing and thawing of rat sperm resulted in decrease in motility, plasma membrane integrity, acrosome integrity and MMP. Our results indicate that MMP was highly affected from freezing for both SD and F344 rat strains. The motility and acrosome integrity of SD rat sperm were approximately 32% and 27% for TES-R and TES-S extenders at 100°C/min cooling rate. On the other hand, plasma and mitochondrial membrane integrity were approximately 21% and 4% for TES-R and TES-S, respectively. These results suggest that freezing injury and lower progressive motility in rat sperm may be mostly caused by damage to MMP. Yamashiro et al. [58] previously showed that supplementation adenosine 5-triphosphate (ATP) to extender, before freezing, enhanced sperm cryosurvival by improving the metabolic capacity of rat sperm. Similarly, Kim et al. [25] in our laboratory obtained slightly higher total (36.5%) and progressive (6.0%) motility after adding 2 g/L ATP to TES-sucrose-EY extender. However, plasma membrane integrity and MMP showed only a slight increase compared to this study.
Sperm motility is the most commonly used assay to evaluate fresh or frozen-thawed sperm quality. But this assay is not enough to determine the fertility of sperm samples. Cell viability, acrosomal integrity and mitochondrial function evaluation enable more accurate description of spermatozoa’s fertilization capacity [15]. Post-thaw spermatozoa could be motile but incapable of fertilization due to acrosomal damage [43]. For this reason, all sperm parameters should be taken into consideration to evaluate sperm fertility capability. In this study, motility was the least affected parameter from freezing compared to membrane, acrosome and mitochondrial membrane integrity. Acrosome integrity decreased after freezing but was not affected from freezing rate and extenders and ranged 18.5% to 32.2% for both SD and F344 sperm. This result was lower than the study of Yamashiro et al. [57] who reported 89.3% acrosome integrity in mKRB extender. This conflict may be due to classification of intact and damaged spermatozoa. Another interesting result revealed in our study was that the extenders and cooling rates were not particularly effective in protecting acrosome integrity from freezing injury. In addition, we found that sperm membrane integrity and MMP were highly affected from freezing compared to motility. Besides lower MMP rate, weak membrane integrity may be involved in low progressive motility of rat sperm.
In summary, freezing procedure significantly decreased the motility of rat sperm, but there was no difference between Sprague–Dawley and F344 rat strains. Although SM has been successfully used to cryopreserve mouse sperm, it did not provide cryoprotection for rat sperm. In addition, the results revealed weak interaction between extenders and the cooling rate on the rat sperm viability parameters. Our results indicate that TES extender containing non-penetrating CPA (raffinose or sucrose) with moderate (40 °C/min) and fast (100 °C/min) cooling rate was superior to other extenders and cooling rates tested.
Acknowledgments
Source of funding: This work was supported by the NIH National Center for Research Resources grants R21 RR025913-02
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Reference
- 1.Agca Y, Critser JK. Assisted reproductive technologies and genetic engineering in rats. In: Suckow MA, Weisbroth SH, Franklin CL, editors. The Laboratory Rat. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2005. pp. 165–190. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Agca Y, Gilmore J, Byers M, Woods EJ, Liu J, Critser JK. Osmotic characteristics of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of extenders and sugars. Biol. Reprod. 2002;67:1493–1501. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.005579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aisen E, Quintana M, Medina V, Morello H, Venturino A. Ultramicroscopic and biochemical changes in ram spermatozoa cryopreserved with trehalose-based hypertonic extenders. Cryobiology. 2005;50:239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arriola J, Foote RH. Glycerolation and thawing effects on bull spermatozoa frozen in detergent treated egg yolk and whole egg extenders. J. Dairy. Sci. 1987;70:1664–1670. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80194-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Axnér E, Hermansson U, Linde-Forsberg C. The effect of Equex STM paste and sperm morphology on post-thaw survival of cat epididymal spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004;84:179–191. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barbas JP, Mascarenhas RD. Cryopreservation of domestic animal sperm cells. Cell Tissue Bank. 2009;10:49–62. doi: 10.1007/s10561-008-9081-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bavister BD, Leibfred ML, Lieberman G. Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined medium. Biol. Reprod. 1983;28:235–247. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod28.1.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carvajal G, Cuello C, Ruiz M, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J. Effects of centrifugation before freezing on boar sperm cryosurvival. J. Androl. 2004;25:389–396. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Critser JK, Mobraaten LE. Cryopreservation of murine spermatozoa. ILAR J. 2000;41:197–206. doi: 10.1093/ilar.41.4.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Curry MR, Millar JD, Watson PF. Calculated optimal cooling rates for ram and human sperm, cryopreservation fail to conform with empirical observations. Biol. Reprod. 1994;51:1014–1021. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod51.5.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Curry MR. Cryopreservation of mammalian semen, in. In: Day JC, Stacey GN, editors. rCryopreservation and Freeze-drying Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 368. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2007. pp. 303–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Devireddy RV, Swanlund DJ, Roberts KP, Bischof JC. Subzero water permeability parameters of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of extracellular ice and cryoprotective agents. Biol. Reprod. 1999;61:764–775. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.3.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fiser PS, Fairfull RW. Combined effect of glycerol concentration and cooling velocity on motility and acrosome integrity of boar spermatozoa frozen in 0.5 ml straws. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1990;25:123–132. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080250204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gao D, Mazur P, Critser JK. Fundamental cryobiology of mammalian spermatozoa, in. In: Karow AM, Critser JK, editors. Reproductive Tissue Banking: Scientific Principles. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1997. pp. 263–328. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Graham JK. Assessment of sperm quality: a flow cytometric approach. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2001;68(3–4):239–247. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(01)00160-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gunasena KT, Villines PM, Critser ES, Critser JK. Live Births after autologous transplant of cryopreserved mouse ovaries. Hum. Reprod. 1997;12:101–106. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.1.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guthrie HD, Liu J, Critser JK. Osmotic tolerance limits and effects of cryoprotectants on motility of bovine spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 2002;67:1811–1816. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod67.6.1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guthrie HD, Welch GR. Determination of intracellular reactive oxygen species and high mitochondrial membrane potential in Percoll-treated viable boar sperm using fluorescence-activated flow cytometry. J. Anim. Sci. 2006;84:2089–2100. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hagiwara M, Choi JH, Devireddy RV, Roberts KP, Wolkers WF, Makhlouf A. Cellular biophysics during freezing of rat and mouse sperm predicts post-thaw motility. Biol. Reprod. 2009;81:700–706. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.076075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hammerstedt RH, Graham JK, Nolan JP. Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. J. Androl. 1990;11:73–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Henry MA, Noiles EE, Gao D, Mazur P, Critser JK. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. IV. The effects of cooling rate and warming rate on the maintenance of motility, plasma membrane integrity, and mitochondrial function. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(5):911–918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hirabayash M, Kato M, Aoto T, Sekimoto A, Ueda M, Miyoshi I, Kasai N, Hochi S. Offspring derived from intracytoplasmic injection of transgenic rat sperm. Transgenic Res. 2002;11(2):221–228. doi: 10.1023/a:1015210604906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hochi S, Watanabe K, Kato M, Hirabayashi M. Live rats resulting from injection of oocytes with spermatozoa freeze-dried and stored for one year. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2008;75(5):890–894. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Holt WV. Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology. 2000;53:47–58. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(99)00239-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kim S, Agca C, Agca Y. Changes in rat spermatozoa function after cooling, cryopreservation and centrifugation processes. Cryobiology. 2012;65(3):215–223. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Koshimoto C, Gamliel E, Mazur P. Effect of osmolality and oxygen tension on the survival of mouse sperm frozen to various temperatures in various concentrations of glycerol and raffinose. Cryobiology. 2000;41(3):204–231. doi: 10.1006/cryo.2000.2281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Koshimoto C C, Mazur P. Effects of cooling and warming rate to and from −70 degrees C, and effect of further cooling from −70 to −196 degrees C on the motility of mouse spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 2002;66(5):1477–1484. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod66.5.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lazar J, Moreno C, Jacob HJ, Kwitek AE. Impact of genomics on research in the rat. Genome Res. 2005;15:1717–1728. doi: 10.1101/gr.3744005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mazur P. Cryobiology: the freezing of biological systems. Science. 168(1970):939–949. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3934.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am. J. Physiol. 1984;247(16):125–C142. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1984.247.3.C125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mazur P, Leibo SP, Seidel GE. Cryopreservation of the germplasm of animals used in biological and medical research: Importance, impact, status, and future directions. Biol. Reprod. 2008;78:2–12. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nakagata N, Takeshima T. High fertilizing ability of mouse spermatozoa diluted slowly after cryopreservation. Theriogenology. 1992;37:1283–1291. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nakagata N. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. Mamm. Genome. 2000;11:572–576. doi: 10.1007/s003350010109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nakatsukasa E, Inomata T, Ikeda T, Shino M, Kashiwazaki N. Generation of live rat offspring by intrauterine insemination with epididymal spermatozoa cryopreserved at −196 °C. Reproduction. 2001;122:463–467. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1220463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nakatsukasa E, Kashiwazaki N, Takizawa A, Shino M, Kitada K, Serikawa T, Hakamata Y, Kobayashi E, Takahashi R, Ueda M, Nakashima T, Nakagata N. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa from closed colonies, and inbred, spontaneous mutant, and transgenic strains of rats. Comp. Med. 2003;53:639–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Oh SH, Miyoshi K, Funahashi H. Rat oocytes fertilized in modified rat 1-cell embryo culture medium containing a high sodium chloride concentration and bovine serum albumin maintain developmental ability to the blastocyst stage. Biol. Reprod. 1998;59:884–889. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod59.4.884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Okuyama M, Isogai S, Saga M, Hamada H, Ogawa S. In vitro fertilization (IVF) and artificial insemination by cryopreserved spermatozoa in mouse. J. Fertil. Implant. 1990;7:116–119. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Parks J. Hypothermia and mammalian gametes. In: Karow A, Critser JK, editors. Reproductive Tissue Banking: Scientific Principles. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997. pp. 229–260. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pena A, Linde-Forsberg C. Effects of Equex one- or two- step dilution, and two freezing and thawing rates on post-sthaw survival of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2000;54:859–875. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00397-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Penfold LM, Moore HD. A new method for cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1993;99:131–134. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0990131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pontbriand D, Howard JG, Schiewe MC, Stuart LD, Wildt DE. Effect of cryoprotective diluent and method of freeze-thawing on survival and acrosomal integrity of ram sperm. Cryobiology. 1989;26:341–354. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(89)90058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Purdy PH. A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Rumin. Res. 2006;63:215–225. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pursel VG, Johnson L, Rampacek G. Acrosome morphology of boar spermatozoa incubated before cold shock. J. Anim. Sci. 1972;34:278–283. doi: 10.2527/jas1972.342278x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rutllant J, Pommer AC, Meyers SA. Osmotic tolerance limits and properties of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) spermatozoa. J Androl. 2003;24:534–541. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Salamon S, Maxwell WM. Storage of ram semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000;18:77–111. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00155-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Si W, Benson JD, Men H, Critser JK. Osmotic tolerance limits and effects of cryoprotectants on the motility, plasma membrane integrity and acrosomal integrity of rat sperm. Cryobiology. 2006;53:336–348. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2006.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stacy R, Eroglu A, Fowler A, Biggers J, Toner M. Thermal characterization of Nakagata's mouse sperm freezing protocol. Cryobiology. 2006;52(1):99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2005.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tada N, Sato M, Yamanoi J, Mizorogi T, Kasai K, Ogawa S. Cryopreservation of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of raffinose and glycerol. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1990;89:511–516. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0890511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tesson L, Cozzi J, Menoret S, Remy S, Usal C, Fraichard A, Anegon I. Transgenic modifications of the rat genome. Transgenic Res. 2005;14:531–546. doi: 10.1007/s11248-005-5077-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Toyoda Y, Chang MC. Fertilization of rat eggs in vitro by epididymal spermatozoa and the development of eggs following transfer. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1974;36:9–22. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0360009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Varisli O, Uguz C, Agca C, Agca Y. Effect of chilling on the motility and acrosomal integrity of rat sperm in the presence of various extenders. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. 2009a;48(5):1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Varisli O, Uguz C, Agca C, Agca Y. Various physical stress factors on rat sperm motility, integrity of acrosome, and plasma membrane. J. Androl. 2009b;30:75–86. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.107.004333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Watson PF. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1995;7:871–891. doi: 10.1071/rd9950871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Watson PF. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000;60–61:481–492. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00099-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Woelders H, Matthijs A, Engel B. Effects of trehalose and sucrose, osmolality of the freezing medium, and cooling rate on viability and intactness of bull sperm after freezing and thawing. Cryobiology. 1997;35:93–105. doi: 10.1006/cryo.1997.2028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yamashiro H, Kumamoto K, Wang H, Yamashita Y, Terada T. Effect of semen collection in extender solution on the characteristics of goat spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Dev. 2006;52:397–406. doi: 10.1262/jrd.17104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yamashiro H, Han YJ, Sugawara A, Tomioka I, Hoshino Y, Sato E. Freezability of rat epididymal sperm induced by raffinose in modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (mKRB) based extender solution. Cryobiology. 2007;55:285–294. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yamashiro H, Toyomizu M, Toyama N, Aono N, Sakurai M, Hirdate Y, Yokoo M, Moisyadi S, Sato E. Extracellular ATP and dibutyryl cAMP enhance the freezability of rat epididymal sperm. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2010;49:167–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]