Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;62(3):247–254. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31829d48bf

Using microRNA as an Alternative Treatment for Hyperlipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease: cardio-miRs in the Pipeline

Elizabeth J Hennessy 1, Kathryn J Moore 1
PMCID: PMC3773000  NIHMSID: NIHMS497764  PMID: 23743768

Abstract

It is now appreciated that over 90% of the human genome is comprised of non-coding RNAs that have the ability to affect other components of the genome and regulate gene expression. This has galvanized the development of RNA-based therapeutics for a myriad of diseases, including cancer, inflammatory conditions and cardiovascular disease. Several classes of RNA therapeutics are currently under clinical development, including anti-sense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNA and microRNA mimetics and inhibitors. The field of anti-sense technology saw a huge leap forward with the recent FDA approval of the first anti-sense therapy, directed against apolipoprotein B, for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia. In addition, recent progress in the development of approaches to inhibit microRNAs has helped to illuminate their roles in repressing gene networks, and also revealed their potential as therapeutic targets. In this review, we summarize these exciting opportunities in the field of drug discovery, with a focus on emerging therapeutics in the field of cardiovascular disease.

Keywords: microRNA, therapeutics

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the number one cause of death globally. According to a 2013 report by the American Heart Association and the Center for Disease Control, one in four deaths in the US are due to conditions associated with CVD such as coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, Inflammatory heart disease and stroke1, and the associated costs are $312.6 billion (US) each year for health care and loss of productivity. The statin class of lipid-lowering agents are widely used to treat CVD as well as to prevent the onset of disease. Although very effective at lowering LDL cholesterol, the outcomes of large-scale clinical trials have shown that statins reduce the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events by only 20%–40%. Furthermore, while statins are generally well-tolerated, side effects such as myopathy occur in approximately 10% of patients receiving treatment2 and a proportion of patients are statin resistant (estimates of up to 20%) or intolerant3. Thus, there is a need for new therapies to reduce residual disease burden in these patient populations.

RNA-based therapeutics hold potential as new treatments for human disease. In the last decade there has been an explosion of knowledge in the RNA field. The completion of the recent ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) project, a multi-center effort whose goal was to generate a comprehensive list of functional elements in the human genome by sequencing RNA from a diverse range of sources, identified that over 90% of the human genome is comprised of non-coding RNA that have the ability to affect other components of the genome4. Using comparative genomics, integrative bioinformatic methods, and human curation, the ENCODE investigators identified such elements as binding sites for proteins that influence gene activity. Non-coding RNA species have numerous roles and serve to silence stretches of our chromosomes5. Several RNA-based therapeutics are currently under clinical development by biotechnology companies, including anti-sense oligonucleotides (ASOs), small interfering RNA (siRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) mimetics and inhibitors (Figure 1). In this review, we will summarize these exciting opportunities in the field of drug discovery, with a focus on emerging therapeutics in the field of cardiovascular disease.

Figure 1. RNA-based therapeutics currently under clinical development.

Figure 1

miRNAs are transcribed from the genome as primary transcripts, and processed by enzymes in the nucleus (Drosha/Pasha) and cytoplasm (Dicer) of the cell resulting in the generation of a mature 20–22 miRNA. The mature miRNA, in association with RISC, binds via its seed sequence to complementary target sites in the 3’UTR of target mRNAs. Oligonucleotide-based therapies targeting these pathways that are under clinical development include: 1. LNA or 2’F/MOE-modified anti-miRs, which act to sequester complementary mature miRNAs and prevent them from binding and repressing target mRNAs, leading to enhanced target gene expression; 2. miR sponges, which bind to 6–8 nucleotide seed sequences of mature miRNAs to also prevent them from binding to target mRNAs, thus leading to increased target gene expression; and 3. miR mimetics, which mimic endogenous miRNAs and act to target mRNAs resulting in a decrease mRNA expression.

Targeting individual genes using anti-sense oligonucleotides and siRNA

ASOs offer promise for the treatment of conditions in which the reduction of a single protein may be beneficial. ASOs are single stranded, highly specific, complementary sequences that target a single gene by interrupting translation of mRNA through the degradation of the transcript by an RNase H cleavage mechanism6. This prevents the target mRNA from being translated, thereby reducing the level of the protein by preventing it from reaching the ribosome7,8. These oligonucleotides are generally 15–23 nucleotides in length and can be chemically modified with the insertion of a 2’methoxyethyl or 2’4’-constrained 2’O-ethyl into the ribose ring to increase their stability and reduce their susceptibility to DNases. ASOs delivered by intravenous (i.v.) infusion or subcutaneous injection accumulate predominantly in the kidney, liver, spleen, adipocytes and bone marrow, but do not cross the blood brain barrier.

The field of anti-sense technology saw a huge leap forward this year with the FDA approval of Mipomersen, an ASO targeting apolipoprotein B (ApoB), an essential component of LDL particles and related atherogenic lipoproteins. This first-in-class drug developed by Isis Pharmaceuticals, now renamed KYNAMRO, is currently approved for treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)911, a genetic disorder of lipid metabolism that is characterized by the elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and increased risk for premature coronary heart disease. KYNAMRO accumulates predominantly in the liver, where it silences apoB mRNA, thereby reducing hepatic apoB-100, and total and LDL-C, in a dose-and time-dependent manner. KYNAMRO therapy results in a 25–50% reduction in LDL-C levels in FH patients on maximally effective lipid therapies. Potential side effects of KYNAMRO and other ASOs include injection site reactions, as well as liver toxicity and hepatosteatosis following chronic use.

The approval of KYNAMRO will no doubt pave the way for other anti-sense drugs and there are currently eight open clinical trials examining the use of ASOs for the treatment of various conditions including cancers and atrial fibrillation (clinicaltrials.gov). Isis Pharmaceuticals has several other promising drug candidates in the pipeline for the treatment of various CVD disorders including an ASO directed against Apolipoprotein CIII (ApoCIII), which is currently being evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. ApoCIII is a component of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and inhibits lipoprotein and hepatic lipase, and acts to reduce hepatic uptake of triglycerides. Elevated levels of ApoCIII are found in patients with dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Another ASO being developed by Isis Pharmaceuticals targets C-reactive protein (CRP), a gene expressed in the liver that is elevated in response to inflammation. By targeting CRP, this anti-sense therapy may be beneficial for a range of diseases including inflammatory conditions such as Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Other ASOs in development for the treatment of CVD include ASOs targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) (Alnylam, ALN-PCS) and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP) (Aegerion Pharmaceuticals – Lomitapide).

RNA interference (RNAi) is a highly conserved endogenous mechanism present in most eukaryotic cells that enables degradation of specific mRNAs. The exploitation of this mechanism using siRNA for therapeutic targeting of single genes attracted a considerable amount of attention in the last decade. Unlike ASOs which are single stranded oligonucleotides, siRNAs are short stretches of double stranded RNA (19–25 bp) from both exogenous and endogenous sources. SiRNAs, are incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) found in the cytoplasm of the cell and bind to target mRNAs resulting in their degradation by a RISC-dependent mechanism12. The length of complementarity between an siRNA and its gene target maximizes specificity and minimizes off target effects13. RNAi is thought to have evolved as a defense mechanism against invading viral RNA to inhibit the replication of the virus within a cell14. Despite their early promise, difficulties in the delivery of the siRNAs to the appropriate organ or tissue, as well as injection site reactions and interferon production, have hampered their clinical development15. Ongoing work is targeted at improving delivery systems for siRNAs to improve their effectiveness.

Targeting gene pathways by manipulating microRNAs

miRNAs are short (20–22 nucleotides) non-coding RNAs that post-transcriptionally regulate target gene expression. Originally discovered in C. elegans by Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun in 199316,17, there are now 25,141 identified mature miRNAs in 193 species18, including 2,042 mature miRNAs in humans. Each of these miRNAs has the potential to simultaneously target multiple mRNAs, and repress genes found in the same or similar pathways to alter biological networks19. Dysregulation of miRNAs in disease states can thus alter gene networks, and miRNA replacement therapy or anti-sense inhibition of miRNAs offer the potential to restore gene expression in the cell to the normal state. Furthermore, the characteristic ability of miRNAs to target gene networks, such as those controlling key cellular processes, including insulin signaling or cholesterol efflux, offers a new approach for the treatment of disease by modulating gene pathways rather than single targets.

microRNAs as fine tuners of gene expression

miRNAs are transcribed from intergenic or intronic regions of the genome as hairpin-containing primary RNA transcripts. Once transcribed, the primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) is processed by the nuclear RNA machinery Drosha and DGCR8/Pasha into an ~65 nucleotide precursor stem-loop structure (pre-miRNA) that contains the miRNA and its complementary strand within the stem. The pre-miRNA is exported into the cytoplasm of the cell and further processed by the Dicer enzyme into a 21–23 base-pair RNA duplex. One strand is selected as the leading strand and the other the lagging (star or *) strand20. The mechanism of strand selection remains unclear but it is thought that thermodynamic properties of the strands lead to a greater susceptibility to degradation of one over the other21. While the leading strand is often the -5p strand, there are several examples of miRNAs where the 3p strand is more highly abundant, such as miR-27 (microRNA.org). Although the *strand was originally proposed to be degraded, it is becoming clear that both strands can be functional22. These small strands of RNA do not contain start and stop codons that would allow a ribosome to attach and translate it into a functional protein. Instead, they associate with the RISC complex which is composed of Argonaute proteins (Ago1/2) and GW18223. RISC uses the strand of miRNA as a template to recognize messenger RNA (mRNA) that has a 6–8 nucleotide sequence complementary to the miRNA seed sequence (miRNA nucleotides 2 through 7 or 8). The binding of the miRNA to target mRNAs generally occurs in the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of the mRNA but miRNAs can also bind to the coding region, as well as the 5’ UTR2426. The base-pairing of miRNA to mRNA ultimately leads to inhibition of protein translation and/or mRNA destabilization and degradation27,28. There have been conflicting reports as to which comes first, translation inhibition or mRNA decay. Mammalian miRNAs have been reported to decrease target gene mRNA levels and subsequently affect translation29. However, subsequent studies using Drosophila melanogaster and zebrafish as models demonstrated that the effects of miRNAs on translational repression precede the effects on mRNA target deadenylation or decay30,31.

Predicting microRNA target genes

Current computational approaches estimate that more than 60% of human genes are targeted by miRNAs, and many of these interactions are highly conserved throughout evolution32. Different databases, such as Targetscan, Miranda, PicTar, PITA and miRBase have generated algorithms to predict miRNA/mRNA interactions based on sequence complementarity. Each algorithm considers several “rules” that predict the likelihood of a miRNA finding a successful mRNA binding partner. Nucleotide 1 of the miRNA should have an A nucleotide across from it on the mRNA strand near its polyA tail, nucleotides 2 through 8 (the seed sequence) should have perfect base-pairing, nucleotide 9 should have an A or a U across from it on the mRNA and nucleotides 13–16 of the miRNA should have good base pairing with its mRNA target3335. The databases also consider the degree of seed sequence conservation between various species, which can be an indicator of evolutionary significance. Despite these rules, each database uses a slightly different algorithm that results in a great deal of false-positives.

Using bioinformatics analysis such as Gene Ontology annotation can provide global insight into the biological function of a particular miRNA in a biological pathway where a miRNA may be acting as an “on/off” switch. Through their ability to regulate many proteins in a pathway at various steps, miRNAs can exert powerful control over processes like cellular differentiation and metabolism36,37. Identifying legitimate targets of miRNAs has proven to be a daunting task. mRNA regulation by a miRNA only requires an interaction of 6–8 nucleotides and these seed sequences can be found in the genome on average approximately every 4 kilobases, thus a miRNA has the potential to regulate hundreds of genes. Artificially introducing or inhibiting miRNAs has proven useful in providing clues to their functions. Such miRNA overexpression and knockdown studies have revealed that the majority of miRNAs regulate a number of proteins at modest levels of less than 2-fold19,38. However, these techniques are laborious and require verifying targets on a single gene basis. To overcome these limitations, techniques such as Argonaute HITS-CLIP (Ago-HITS-CLIP), miRNA-biotin pull-down and miRNP immunopurification experiments are now being used to experimentally determine the compendium of mRNAs interacting with a specific miRNA3942.

Therapeutic inhibition of microRNAs

Although miRNAs exert subtle effects on individual gene targets, the cumulative effect of miRNA targeting of multiple genes in a pathway is significant and produces measurable phenotypic results. The ability to target single miRNAs and alter the expression of gene networks provides a unique approach to drug development that moves beyond the “one-drug-one-target” mode of treatment. A promising approach is the use of anti-miR oligonucleotides that are chemically modified to enhance target affinity, stability and tissue uptake43. Anti-miR oligonucleotides can be adapted with locked nucleic acids (LNAs) which have high binding efficiencies and improved stability with the addition of a methylene link between the 2′-oxygen and the 4′-carbon resulting in a “locked” position and reducing the flexibility of the ribose ring44. Other chemical modifications such as 2’methoxyethyl (MOE) and 2’4’-constrained 2’O-ethyl (cEt), into the ribose sugar ring of a nucleotide have also improved the pharmacokinetics of ASO clinical candidates. Unlike their double-stranded counterparts, single stranded oligonucleotide inhibitors can be formulated in saline for subcutaneous or intravenous delivery and do not require lipid-based delivery systems. Cholesterol analogs have been added to anti-miRs in an attempt increase cellular uptake, and this promotes their incorporation into low and high density lipoproteins (LDL and HDL)4547. Preclinical studies in mice and non-human primates have shown that upon systemic delivery, these compounds rapidly leave the plasma and are taken up by multiple tissues, most prominently liver, spleen, kidney, adipose tissue and bone marrow48,49. Once taken up by cells, the anti-miR forms a stable, high-affinity bond with the miRNA reducing the availability of the endogenous miRNA for binding to the 3’UTR of the mRNA target.

The use of chemically modified anti-miRs has proven therapeutically beneficial in mouse models of cardiac dysfunction, mouse tumor models and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in non-human primates50,51. The most advanced miRNA inhibition program is directed against miR-122 which targets HCV RNA and facilitates viral replication in the host cell52. Studies using an LNA-modified ASO directed against miR-122 showed long-lasting suppression of HCV viremia in non-human primates, with no evidence of viral resistance or side effects53. Santaris Pharma initiated a phase 2a study in humans to assess the safety and antiviral activity of this anti-miR, now called Miravirsen, in HCV patients who had never received treatment54. Miravirsen demonstrated dose-dependent antiviral activity when given as a 4-week monotherapy that was maintained for more than 4 weeks after the end of therapy. Furthermore, HCV RNAs in four of nine patients treated with the highest doses of Miravirsen became undetectable during the study55, demonstrating the potential of anti-miR therapeutics. Silencing and overexpressing miR-122 has also been shown to have an impact on plasma lipoproteins56. Overexpression of miR-122 increases the expression of several cholesterol-synthesis genes including Hmgcrs1, Sqle and Dhrc7 thus increasing cholesterol synthesis51 and conversely inhibitors of miR-122 decrease hepatic expression of genes implicated in cholesterol synthesis and triglyceride metabolism, resulting in reduced plasma cholesterol. However, the direct targets of miR-122 that confer this effect on cholesterol synthesis and metabolism pathways remain elusive.

miRNA sponges or decoy transcripts are another approach for inhibiting miRNAs in the cell57 and these molecules act as competitive inhibitors of the miRNA of interest. miRNA sponges contain multiple binding sites that are complementary to the seed sequence of a miRNA of interest. The sponge binds to the miRNA of interest so it can no longer bind to its targets. A potential disadvantage of the miRNA sponge approach is the difficulty in determining the dosage. If a miRNA is highly expressed, a potentially unfeasible dose of sponge may be needed to silence it, and also where there is an abundance of miRNA target genes, a much lower dose of sponge will be required to silence the miRNA. Notably, when vectors containing miRNA sponges were transfected into cells, miRNA target genes were as derepressed as when anti-miR oligonucleotides were used58. miRNA sponges can be delivered using viral vectors, and their expression can be made to be inducible in a specific cell type or developmental stage by using specific promoters.

Delivery of microRNA mimetics

miRNA mimetics may be used therapeutically to overexpress a miRNA leading to the downregulation of its target genes. Mimetics could be used to reconstitute a miRNA that is downregulated during disease (many miRNAs are decreased in cancer59), or to decrease gene pathways involved in the pathology of the disease. The delivery of therapeutic miRNA molecules in vivo faces many of the same challenges as siRNAs due to the double-stranded nature of the molecule. Drug delivery vehicles such as liposomes, polymeric micelles and lipoprotein-based drug carriers are being developed to deliver these oligonucleotides to cells. A model drug delivery vehicle should be non-toxic, biodegradable and avoid recognition by the host’s immune defense mechanisms. Interestingly, endogenous HDL particles were recently shown to be associated with miRNAs in the circulation and to deliver their miRNA cargo to other cells60. Thus, lipoprotein-based drug carriers like HDL particles also hold potential to deliver miRNA mimetics to specific target tissues such as the liver. One of the biggest challenges associated with miRNA replacement technology is the ability to target miRNAs to a specific tissue. Multiple doses of a miRNA mimetic may be required to provide sufficient miRNA levels in target tissues to achieve sustained target repression.

Viruses are also being used as gene delivery carriers for miRNAs, including short hairpin RNAs that can be processed in the target cell into the mature miRNA. There are several examples of preclinical studies in mice using viral vectors to either overexpress or inhibit miRNAs61. In a study relevant to cardiovascular disease, lentiviral delivery was used to overexpress and inhibit miR-33, which targets ABCA1, a key gene involved in cellular cholesterol efflux. Lentiviral delivery of miR-33 or anti-miR-33 to the liver resulted in decreased and increased expression of hepatic ABCA1 respectively, and this correlated with changes in plasma levels of HDL-C62.

Subsequent studies using ASOs delivered subcutaneously showed similar results63, and thus a viral delivery system seems unlikely to be used clinically. However, for delivery of miRNAs to other tissues, viral vectors may confer an advantage. Recent approaches to tailor miRNA delivery to a specific tissues such as cardiac muscle involves incorporating target sites for tissue-specific miRNAs, such as liver specific miR-122 and miR-19264, which would silence the vector in the liver, but allow it to be functional in other tissues. In all such strategies, the dosing of mimetics must be carefully considered, as the effects of mimetics are dependent upon the availability of RISC complexes, which may become saturated with overexpression. There is also the possibility of competition between miRNAs and shRNAs for limiting cellular factors required for the processing of various small RNAs such as RISC and the exportin-5 protein used to transport RNA species from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.

The Cardio-miR Pipeline

Several biopharmaceutical companies are leading the discovery race toward RNA therapeutics to treat cardiovascular disease. miRagen Therapeutics’s lead program, MGN-9103, a LNA-modified ASO against a cardiac-specific miRNA, miR-208, has shown benefits in cardiac dysfunction and may have therapeutic potential in a variety of metabolic disorders that contribute to metabolic syndrome65. Cardiac-specific pharmacologic inhibition of miR-208a in mice confers resistance to high-fat diet-induced obesity and improves systemic insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance through the targeting of MED13, a component of the mediator complex which is responsible for bridging DNA bound transcription factors and RNA polymerase II 66,67.

Regulus Therapeutics Inc. is developing an anti-miR oligonucleotide against miR-33a/b for the treatment of atherosclerosis63. As described above, miR-33 targets genes involved in cellular cholesterol efflux and HDL metabolism, such ABCA1, as well as genes involved in fatty acid oxidation, including CROT, CPT1, and HADHB. Subcutaneous delivery of 2’F/MOE-modified anti-miR-33 to mouse and non-human primate models increased plasma HDL cholesterol levels by 35–50%68. Furthermore, anti-miR-33 was shown to directly target macrophages in mouse atherosclerotic plaques, and to cause regression of atherosclerosis characterized by a 35% reduction in plaque size and decreases in macrophages and inflammatory gene expression68. Whether these effects were due to increases in circulating HDL or direct effects on the plaque macrophages are yet to be determined. Notably, no adverse effects of anti-miR-33 were observed in preclinical models in which this anti-miR was delivered for up to 12 weeks, as assessed by body weight, liver enzymes, plasma cytokine levels, blood chemistry panels and blood counts. This suggests that anti-miR-33 treatment may be a promising therapeutic to treat dyslipidemias that promote atherosclerosis.

With the continued obesity epidemic there is an urgent need for new therapeutics for type 2 diabetes and its associated co-morbidities. The recent discovery of miR-103 and miR-107 as key regulators of insulin sensitivity and obesity identifies these miRNAs as potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity and associated metabolic diseases69. These miRNAs were identified from a screen of miRNAs dysregulated in the livers of leptin-deficient (ob/ob) or diet-induced obese mice. Anti-miR-based silencing of these miR-103 and miR-107 in obese mice led to improved glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity through the targeting of caveolin-1 (Cav-1)69. The upregulation of Cav-1 led to increased expression of the insulin receptor and insulin signaling, as well as decreased adipocyte size and enhanced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Thus, manipulation of miR-103/107 may offer a new therapeutic approach to treating insulin resistance, however more research is needed to understand the roles of these miRNAs in normal human physiology and disease.

Another area of promise for miRNA therapeutics is the treatment of fibrosis. Cardiac fibrosis is a condition where there is an abnormal thickening of the heart valves due to uncontrolled proliferation of fibroblasts, which can lead to heart failure. miR-29 is implicated in cardiac fibrosis and has been found to be downregulated following myocardial infarction in the region of the heart next to the infarct70. This miRNA has a variety of targets involved in fibrosis such as collagens, fibrillins and elastin that are upregulated in response to MI and resulting fibrosis. Because miR-29 is decreased in response to cardiac injury, miRagen Therapeutics is developing a so-called pro-miR called MGN-4220 that targets multiple components of the fibrosis pathway.

Cardiac fibroblasts have elevated miR-21 levels leading to a decrease in its target mRNA, Sprouty-1 (Spry1), a negative regulator of ERK-MAPkinase activity and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) secretion71. Regulus Therapeutics Inc. and Sanofi Aventis are developing an ASO to miR-21 that would elevate Spry1 expression, reduce FGF2 and thus decrease fibroblast growth. Preclinical studies in a rodent model of Alport syndrome show that anti-miR-21 reduces the severity of kidney fibrosis and improves kidney function72. However, genetic deletion of miR-21 did not offer protection to mice undergoing cardiac stresses73,74, suggesting potential miRNA redundancies, or off-target effects of the anti-miR, possibilities that need to be further investigated. Despite these conflicting reports, anti-miR-21 may have the potential to treat a variety of fibrotic conditions, including cardiac fibrosis.

A number of miRNAs found to be upregulated in the heart following myocardial infarction are also potential drug targets. The miR-15 family of miRNAs, including miR-15, miR-16, miR-195 and miR-497 has been implicated in cell cycle arrest and survival through the regulation of anti-apoptotic and cell cycle genes75. These miRNAs are upregulated following myocardial infarction, causing loss of cardiomyocytes and cardiac pump function and overexpression of miR-195 in the heart was sufficient to cause heart failure76. However, targeting a family of miRNAs that share targets genes can be challenging. Each of the miR-15 family members has a slightly different sequence and this divergence means that a single ASO will likely be ineffective at overcoming this redundancy. miRagen Therapeutics is developing an anti-miR towards miR-15/195 called MGN-1374 for post-MI remodeling of the heart. Interestingly, a recent study using an 8-mer (nucleotide) directed against the seed region of the miR-15 family was more effective in derepression of target genes than an LNA-modified 16-mer75.

Several other miRNAs have been used in pre-clinical models of cardiac diseases, and show promise for future development. miR-155 has been implicated in viral myocarditis which results from cardiotropic viruses 77,78. An LNA-anti-miR directed against miR-155 delivered to mice derepressed the target gene PU.1 and resulted in reduced infiltration of monocytes, decreased T-cell activation and diminished myocardial damage during myocarditis. Furthermore, miR-145 has been linked to pulmonary hypertension, which can lead to heart failure and miRagen Therapeutics is developing an anti-miR therapy that has shown potential in reducing pulmonary vascular remodeling in response to hypoxia79. Genetic deletion of miR-145 resulted in excessive right ventrical remodeling and reduced blood pressure suggesting that timing and dosing need to be optimized for the anti-miR-145 therapy. Finally, the miR-34 family of miRNAs is upregulated in the heart in response to stress, including myocardial infarction. miRNA Therapeutics Inc. is developing an LNA-modified anti-miR against miR-34a that has demonstrated the ability to improve systolic pressure and increase angiogenesis and Akt activity 80. These effects were accompanied by an increase in mir-34a target genes Notch1 and Semaphorin 4B.

The Future of the Pipeline

The health and financial burdens that cardiovascular disease presents to the global population is vast and daunting. It was once thought that cardiovascular tissues would be difficult to target with gene therapies. miRNA therapeutics offer hope for the development of novel treatments for CVD. The preclinical studies described in this review illustrate the early success of miRNA inhibitors and mimics. The recent FDA approval of Mipomersen/KYNAMRO, a first-in-class ASO inhibitor that targets apoB leading to the reduction of LDL-C for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia10, opens the door to other oligonucleotide-based therapies, bringing miRNA therapeutics one step closer to the clinic.

Table 1.

Current RNA-based therapeutic approaches

RNA Technology Components Target RNA Method of Delivery Mechanism
Anti-sense oligonucleotide (ASO) Single-stranded oligonucleotide (15-23nt) with chemical modifications mRNA Subcutaneous or intravenous injection of ASO Cleavage of target mRNA by RNase H
siRNA Double-stranded RNA (19-25bp) mRNA Requires lipid-delivery vehicle Cleavage of target mRNA by RISC
Anti-miR oligonucleotide Single-stranded RNA (15-19nt) with chemical modifications Mature miRNA Subcutaneous or intravenous injection of oligo. Sequesters mature miRNA inhibits from binding target mRNA
miR mimic Double-stranded RNA (20-23bp) mRNA Requires lipid-delivery vehicle Cleavage of target mRNA by RISC

Table 2.

The Cardio-miR pipeline

miRNA Disease Indication Drug Design Target Tissue Potential Target Gene Functional Outcome Company Ref.
miR-122 HCV, hyperlipidemia Miravirsen (LNA modified anti-sense oligonucleotide) Liver Hmgcrs1, Sqle and Dhrc7 Suppression of HCV viremia, reduces plasma cholesterol levels SantarisPharma 5156
miR-208 Obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome MGN-9103 (LNA modified anti-sense oligonucleotide) Cardiac-specific MED13 Resistance to high-fat diet-induced obesity, improves systemic insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance miRagen Therapeutics 6567
miR-33 Atherosclerosis 2’F/MOE-modified anti-sense oligonucleotide; anti-miR-33lentivirus Liver ABCA1 Raised HDL and induced regression of atherosclerotic plaques Regulus Therapeutics, AstraZeneca 62,63,68
miR-103/107 Obesity, Diabetes 2′-OMe-modified anti-miR with phosphorothioate linkage and cholesterol linked Liver Caveolin-1 Improved glucose homeostasis, Regulus Therapeutics, Alnylam 69
miR-29 Fibrosis Mimetic molecule (lead strand - 2’ F nucleosides at every pyrimidine residue; lagging strand - 2 5’ terminal 2-OMe residues) Heart ELNF, BN1, COL1A1, COL1ACOL3A1 Inhibition of miR-29 induces fibrosis, overepxression leads to decrease in collagen genes and subsequent fibrosis Miragen Therapeutics 70
miR-21 Fibrosis 2′-OMe-modified anti-miR with phosphate backbone Kidney PPARα, Spry1 Reduces severity of kidney fibrosis, improves renal function only in response to injury Regulus Therapeutics, Sanofi Aventis 7174
miR-15 family Myocardial Infarction MGN-1374 (LNA modified anti-sense oligonucleotide); 8-mer LNA oligonucleotide targeting seed region Heart Pdk4, SGK1, Bcl2, Arl2 post-MI remodeling Miragen Therapeutics 75,76
miR-155 viral myocarditis LNA-anti-miR-155 Cardiac Monocytes/ macrophage PU.1 Reduced infiltration of cardiac monocytes and macrophages, T-cell activation and myocardial damage 77,78
miR-145 pulmonary hypertension LNA-anti-miR-145 Lung and cardiac tissues Potential in reducing pulmonary vascular remodeling in response to hypoxia Miragen Therapeutics 79
miR-34a Myocardial Infarction LNA-anti-miR-34a Cardiac tissues Notch1, Sema4b Improve systolic pressure and increase angiogenesis and Akt activity miRNA Therapeutics Inc. 80

Acknowledgments

Research on microRNAs in the Moore Lab is supported by the NIH (R01HL108182), and E.J.H. is supported by an NIH Training Grant (NIH/NHLBI grant T32HL098129) K.J.M. is a member of the miR-33 Clinical Advisory Board of Regulus Therapeutics, a microRNA therapeutics company.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:e6–e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harper CR, Jacobson TA. The broad spectrum of statin myopathy: from myalgia to rhabdomyolysis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2007;18:401–408. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e32825a6773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maningat P, Breslow JL. Needed: pragmatic clinical trials for statin-intolerant patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2250–2251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1112023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) Project. Science. 2004;306:636–640. doi: 10.1126/science.1105136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dunham I, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57–74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aartsma-Rus A, et al. Guidelines for antisense oligonucleotide design and insight into splice-modulating mechanisms. Mol Ther. 2009;17:548–553. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baker BF, et al. 2’-O-(2-Methoxy)ethyl-modified anti-intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) oligonucleotides selectively increase the ICAM-1 mRNA level and inhibit formation of the ICAM-1 translation initiation complex in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:11994–12000. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.18.11994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chan JH, Lim S, Wong WS. Antisense oligonucleotides: from design to therapeutic application. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;33:533–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bell DA, Hooper AJ, Burnett JR. Mipomersen, an antisense apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2011;20:265–272. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2011.547471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gebhard C, Huard G, Kritikou EA, Tardif JC. Apolipoprotein B Antisense Inhibition - Update on Mipomersen. Curr Pharm Des. 2013 doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vogt A, Parhofer KG. The potential of mipomersen, an ApoB synthesis inhibitor, to reduce necessity for LDL-apheresis in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and coronary artery disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013 doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.779253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gregory RI, Chendrimada TP, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R. Human RISC couples microRNA biogenesis and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell. 2005;123:631–640. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qiu S, Adema CM, Lane T. A computational study of off-target effects of RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:1834–1847. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Obbard DJ, Gordon KH, Buck AH, Jiggins FM. The evolution of RNAi as a defence against viruses and transposable elements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364:99–115. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rivera S, Yuan F. Critical issues in delivery of RNAi therapeutics in vivo. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1279–1291. doi: 10.2174/138920112800624300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75:843–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wightman B, Ha I, Ruvkun G. Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell. 1993;75:855–862. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D152–157. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Selbach M, et al. Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs. Nature. 2008;455:58–63. doi: 10.1038/nature07228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang JS, et al. Widespread regulatory activity of vertebrate microRNA* species. RNA. 2011;17:312–326. doi: 10.1261/rna.2537911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mah S, Buske C, Humphries RK, Kuchenbauer F. miRNA*: a passenger stranded in RNA-induced silencing complex? Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2010;20:141–148. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v20.i2.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marco A, Macpherson JI, Ronshaugen M, Griffiths-Jones S. MicroRNAs from the same precursor have different targeting properties. Silence. 2012;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1758-907X-3-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yao B, La LB, Chen YC, Chang LJ, Chan EK. Defining a new role of GW182 in maintaining miRNA stability. EMBO Rep. 2012;13:1102–1108. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sacco LD, Masotti A. Recent Insights and Novel Bioinformatics Tools to Understand the Role of MicroRNAs Binding to 5′ Untranslated Region. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;14:480–495. doi: 10.3390/ijms14010480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reczko M, Maragkakis M, Alexiou P, Grosse I, Hatzigeorgiou AG. Functional microRNA targets in protein coding sequences. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:771–776. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Orom U, Nielsen FC, Lund AH. MicroRNA-10a binds the 5′UTR of ribosomal protein mRNAs and enhances their translation. Mol Cell. 2008;30:460–471. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chekulaeva M, et al. miRNA repression involves GW182-mediated recruitment of CCR4-NOT through conserved W-containing motifs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:1218–1226. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wu L, Fan J, Belasco JG. MicroRNAs direct rapid deadenylation of mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:4034–4039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510928103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guo H, Ingolia NT, Weissman JS, Bartel DP. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature. 2010;466:835–840. doi: 10.1038/nature09267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bazzini A, Lee MT, Giraldez AJ. Ribosome profiling shows that miR-430 reduces translation before causing mRNA decay in zebrafish. Science. 2012;336:233–237. doi: 10.1126/science.1215704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Djuranovic S, Nahvi A, Green R. miRNA-mediated gene silencing by translational repression followed by mRNA deadenylation and decay. Science. 2012;336:237–240. doi: 10.1126/science.1215691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009;19:92–105. doi: 10.1101/gr.082701.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grimson A, et al. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell. 2007;27:91–105. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–355. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kloosterman WP, Plasterk RH. The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell. 2006;11:441–450. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Baek D, et al. The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature. 2008;455:64–71. doi: 10.1038/nature07242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chi SW, Zang JB, Mele A, Darnell RB. Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA-mRNA interaction maps. Nature. 2009;460:479–486. doi: 10.1038/nature08170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lal A, et al. Capture of microRNA-bound mRNAs identifies the tumor suppressor miR-34a as a regulator of growth factor signaling. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Orom UA, Lund AH. Isolation of microRNA targets using biotinylated synthetic microRNAs. Methods. 2007;43:162–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Easow G, Teleman AA, Cohen SM. Isolation of microRNA targets by miRNP immunopurification. RNA. 2007;13:1198–1204. doi: 10.1261/rna.563707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Broderick JA, Zamore PD. MicroRNA therapeutics. Gene Ther. 2011;18:1104–1110. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Grunweller A, Hartmann RK. Locked nucleic acid oligonucleotides: the next generation of antisense agents? BioDrugs. 2007;21:235–243. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200721040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Semple SC, et al. Rational design of cationic lipids for siRNA delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:172–176. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Love KT, et al. Lipid-like materials for low-dose, in vivo gene silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:1864–1869. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910603106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Soutschek J, et al. Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs. Nature. 2004;432:173–178. doi: 10.1038/nature03121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stenvang J, Petri A, Lindow M, Obad S, Kauppinen S. Inhibition of microRNA function by antimiR oligonucleotides. Silence. 2012;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1758-907X-3-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.van Rooij E, Olson EN. MicroRNA therapeutics for cardiovascular disease: opportunities and obstacles. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:860–872. doi: 10.1038/nrd3864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dorn GW., 2nd Therapeutic potential of microRNAs in heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:209–215. doi: 10.1007/s11886-010-0096-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Krutzfeldt J, et al. Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature. 2005;438:685–689. doi: 10.1038/nature04303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jopling CL, Yi M, Lancaster AM, Lemon SM, Sarnow P. Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific MicroRNA. Science. 2005;309:1577–1581. doi: 10.1126/science.1113329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lanford RE, et al. Therapeutic silencing of microRNA-122 in primates with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Science. 2010;327:198–201. doi: 10.1126/science.1178178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Janssen HL, et al. Treatment of HCV Infection by Targeting MicroRNA. N Engl J Med. 2013 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Janssen HL, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo (plb) controlled safety and anti-viral proof of concept study of miravirsen (MIR), an oligonucleotide targeting miR-122, in treatment naíve patients with genotype 1 (gt1) chronic HCV infection. The 62nd annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; The Liver Meeting; San Francisco, CA. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Esau C, et al. miR-122 regulation of lipid metabolism revealed by in vivo antisense targeting. Cell Metab. 2006;3:87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ebert MS, Neilson JR, Sharp PA. MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells. Nat Methods. 2007;4:721–726. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kluiver J, et al. Generation of miRNA sponge constructs. Methods. 2012;58:113–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lu J, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature03702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vickers KC, Palmisano BT, Shoucri BM, Shamburek RD, Remaley AT. MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:423–433. doi: 10.1038/ncb2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gentner B, et al. Stable knockdown of microRNA in vivo by lentiviral vectors. Nat Methods. 2009;6:63–66. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rayner KJ, et al. MiR-33 contributes to the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 2010;328:1570–1573. doi: 10.1126/science.1189862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rayner KJ, et al. Antagonism of miR-33 in mice promotes reverse cholesterol transport and regression of atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2921–2931. doi: 10.1172/JCI57275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Geisler A, et al. microRNA122-regulated transgene expression increases specificity of cardiac gene transfer upon intravenous delivery of AAV9 vectors. Gene Ther. 2011;18:199–209. doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Montgomery RL, et al. Therapeutic inhibition of miR-208a improves cardiac function and survival during heart failure. Circulation. 2011;124:1537–1547. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.030932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Grueter CE, et al. A cardiac microRNA governs systemic energy homeostasis by regulation of MED13. Cell. 2012;149:671–683. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Conaway RC, Conaway JW. Function and regulation of the Mediator complex. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011;21:225–230. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rayner KJ, et al. Inhibition of miR-33a/b in non-human primates raises plasma HDL and lowers VLDL triglycerides. Nature. 2011;478:404–407. doi: 10.1038/nature10486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Trajkovski M, et al. MicroRNAs 103 and 107 regulate insulin sensitivity. Nature. 2011;474:649–653. doi: 10.1038/nature10112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.van Rooij E, et al. Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13027–13032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805038105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Thum T, et al. MicroRNA-21 contributes to myocardial disease by stimulating MAP kinase signalling in fibroblasts. Nature. 2008;456:980–984. doi: 10.1038/nature07511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chau BN, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes fibrosis of the kidney by silencing metabolic pathways. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:121ra118. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Patrick DM, et al. Stress-dependent cardiac remodeling occurs in the absence of microRNA-21 in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3912–3916. doi: 10.1172/JCI43604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Morrisey EE. The magic and mystery of miR-21. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3817–3819. doi: 10.1172/JCI44596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hullinger TG, et al. Inhibition of miR-15 protects against cardiac ischemic injury. Circ Res. 2012;110:71–81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.244442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.van Rooij E, et al. A signature pattern of stress-responsive microRNAs that can evoke cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18255–18260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608791103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sun X, Feinberg MW. Knocking out viral myocarditis: reality or a miRage? Circ Res. 2012;111:388–391. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.275214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Corsten MF, et al. MicroRNA profiling identifies microRNA-155 as an adverse mediator of cardiac injury and dysfunction during acute viral myocarditis. Circ Res. 2012;111:415–425. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.267443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Caruso P, et al. A role for miR-145 in pulmonary arterial hypertension: evidence from mouse models and patient samples. Circ Res. 2012;111:290–300. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.267591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bernardo BC, et al. Therapeutic inhibition of the miR-34 family attenuates pathological cardiac remodeling and improves heart function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:17615–17620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206432109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES