Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Jun 25;135(27):9968–9971. doi: 10.1021/ja400021x

N,C-capped dipeptides with selectivity for mycobacterial proteasome over human proteasomes: Role of S3 and S1 binding pockets

Gang Lin 1,, Tamutenda Chidawanyika 1, Christopher Tsu 2, Thulasi Warrier 1, Julien Vaubourgeix 1, Christopher Blackburn 2, Kenneth Gigstad 2, Michael Sintchak 2, Lawrence Dick 2, Carl Nathan 1,
PMCID: PMC3773049  NIHMSID: NIHMS498856  PMID: 23782398

Abstract

We identified N,C-capped dipeptides that are selective for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome over human constitutive and immunoproteasomes. Differences in S3 and S1 binding pockets appeared to account for species-selectivity. The inhibitors are able to penetrate mycobacteria and kill non-replicating M. tuberculosis under nitrosative stress.


Unique features of enzymes from different species can provide a structural basis for development of species-selective inhibitors, even when the enzymes are highly conserved. Proteasome 20S core particles are found in all three kingdoms of life, with 14 copies of α and 14 copies of β subunits forming a barrel-shaped complex of 4 rings, α7β7β7α7.1 Eukaryotic proteasomes that are widely and constitutively (c-20S) expressed have 7 different copies of α and β, respectively, but only 3 of the β subunits, namely β1, β2, and β5, are enzymatically active. Humans also express an immunoproteasome (i-20S) constitutively in immune cells and inducibly in other cells in response to certain cytokines.24 In the i-20S, β1, β2, and β5 are replaced by β1i, β2i, and β5i. The replacements result in changes in many aspects of the immune response, indicating the importance of the i-20S in the immune system.5 In contrast, eubacterial proteasomes usually have only 1 and rarely 2 types of α and β subunits, and all β subunits are active. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the only known bacterial pathogen with a proteasome. Mtb genes prcB and prcA encode β and α subunits, respectively.6 The Mtb proteasome plays vital roles in defense of the pathogen against nitrosative stress in vitro7 and in persistence in mice.8,9

New drugs are needed that can kill the non-replicating populations of Mtb against which few existing drugs are active.10 In our initial pursuit of inhibitors that are selective for Mtb proteasomes over human proteasomes, we exploited structural differences11 in S1 binding pockets and identified peptide boronates whose P1 amino acids conferred modest selectivity (up to 8-fold) for Mtb20S over hu c-20S.11 We then identified 1,3,4-oxathiazol-2-ones with up to 1300-fold species selectivity. Selectivity appeared to depend on a unique mechanism involving induction of a conformational change in the Mtb proteasome.12 Inhibition of the Mtb proteasome is bactericidal in Mtb that has been rendered non-replicating by sublethal levels of reactive nitrogen intermediates,7,12 an important component of host defense against Mtb.13,14 Instability of oxathiazolones in serum (see below) spurred efforts to find new pharmacophores active on the Mtb proteasome that spare both the human constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome.15 Recently, crystal structures of mouse c-20S and i-20S were solved, and a comparison of the c-20S and i-20S showed that the S1 binding pockets of the β5 and β5i subunits are different enough to design inhibitors that are selective for i-20S over c-20S.16 Herein we report a new class of inhibitors that selectively inhibit the Mtb proteasome over human proteasomes by taking advantage of structural differences in both the S1 and S3 binding pockets between the Mtb20S and both human c-20S and i-20S.

A library of 1600 N,C-capped dipeptides was constructed by varying P4 (the N-cap), P3 and P2 (using natural or unnatural amino acids), and P1 (the C-cap).17 Kinetic studies indicated that this class of compounds acts as rapid-equilibrium, reversible and competitive inhibitors of human proteasomes. X-ray crystallography of the complex of one such compound (ML16, Fig. S1) with the yeast 20S proteasome confirmed that the C-cap projected into the S1 binding pocket (Fig. 1), the first amino acid residue occupied the S2 pocket and the second amino acid residue the S3 pocket.17 We screened this library against the Mtb20S open gate mutant. Of the 1600 compounds tested, 65 inhibited purified recombinant Mtb20SOG ≥ 80% at 2 μM. For 60 of these, IC50s were determined by monitoring the hydrolysis of suc-LLVY-AMC by Mtb20SOG at 37°C. IC50s were then converted to Ki according to equation Ki = IC50/(1+[S]/KM) (Table 1). Of these, 6 compounds had >100-, 2 had >500- and 1 had >1000-fold selectivity for Mtb20SOG over human constitutive proteasome β5 subunit, and 13 compounds showed <100 nM potency. The most potent shared several features: P1: 2,4-diF-benzyl as C-cap; P2: 4-F-phenyl; P3: Asn derivatives; and P4: 3-phenylpropanoyl. The most species selective compounds shared a common feature—a fully substituted N-atom on the P3-Asn amide side chain, in contrast to the preference of Hu20S for the secondary amide neopentyl-Asn. Compounds ML2 and ML9 were highly potent with Ki 30 nM and 63 nM, respectively, and highly selective with 121- and > 1590-fold species selectivity, respectively.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Illustration of N,C-capped dipeptides and corresponding binding subsites and structures of DPLG-2 and DPLG-4.

Table 1.

Kis and species-selectivity of N,C-capped dipeptides against Mtb20SOG and human constitutive 20S.

graphic file with name nihms498856u1.jpg
Ki (μM) - β5c (Ac-WLA-AMC) Ki (μM) - Mtb (Suc-LLVY-AMC)
Ki(β5c)Ki(Mtb)
ID R1 R2 R3
ML1 p-F-Phe N-Et-N-iPr PhCH2CH2 2.14 0.028 77
ML2 p-F-Phe graphic file with name nihms498856t1.jpg PhCH2CH2 3.63 0.030 121
ML3 p-F-Phe graphic file with name nihms498856t2.jpg PhCH2CH2 3.00 0.038 79
ML4 p-F-Phe Neo-pentylamino graphic file with name nihms498856t3.jpg 0.003 0.041 0.1
ML5 H graphic file with name nihms498856t4.jpg PhCH2CH2 10.74 0.042 256
ML6 p-F-Phe N-iPr-N-Pr PhCH2CH2 0.67 0.042 16
ML7 H N-Et-N-iPr graphic file with name nihms498856t5.jpg 5.01 0.057 88
ML8 p-F-Phe graphic file with name nihms498856t6.jpg PhCH2CH2 40.68 0.058 701
ML9 p-F-Phe N,N-diethyl PhCH2CH2 > 100 0.063 > 1590
ML10 p-F-Phe Neo-pentylamino PhCO 0.003 0.063 0.05
ML11 p-F-Phe NH-tBu PhCH2CH2 0.47 0.068 6.8
ML12 p-F-Phe graphic file with name nihms498856t7.jpg PhCH2CH2 8.40 0.070 120
ML13 H graphic file with name nihms498856t8.jpg graphic file with name nihms498856t9.jpg 29.43 0.071 415
[P]=vst+(vi-vs)kobs(1-e(-kobst)) (1)
kobs=kon[I]+koff (2)
ViV0=11+[I]/Ki (3)
Ki=Kiapp1+[S]/KM (4)

To improve upon ML9, we took advantage of prior work demonstrating that the Mtb20S S1 site prefers larger P1 aromatic residues as compared to c-20S.11 We therefore designed and synthesized (Scheme S1) two analogs of ML9, DPLG-2 and DPLG-4. DPLG-2 incorporates P1-naphthyl, while DPLG-4 contains an isopropyl substitution to test if the S1 binding site can tolerate bulkier substituents at the 4-position of the P1 phenyl ring (Fig. 1). Each maintains the P3-N,N-diethyl Asn amide for the S3 binding site. DPLG-2 showed 4-fold increase in potency (Ki 15 nM) against Mtb20SOG compared to ML9; however, DPLG-4 (Ki 770 nM vs Mtb20SOG) showed ~an 18-fold increase in Ki compared to ML9, indicating that the bulky group at the 4-position of the P1 phenyl ring is not well tolerated by the S1 pocket of the Mtb proteasome.

Contrary to the rapid-equilibrium inhibition shown by ML9,17 DPLG-2 inhibited Mtb20SOG in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). Mtb20OG (48 nM) was pre-incubated with and fully inactivated by DPLG-2 (2.5 μM) and then diluted into buffer containing substrate and the recovery of activity was recorded for ~ 25 minutes (Fig. S2). The recovery data points were fitted to Eq. (1) to determine the dissociation rate constant koff = 0.0015 ± 0.0001 s−1, which indicated that the half-life of the enzyme-inhibitor complex is 7.7 minutes. To determine the association rate constant, the proteolytic reaction progress curves in the presence of DPLG-2 at various concentrations were recorded and the data points were fitted to equation (1) to determine kobs at each inhibitor concentration (Fig. 2B). Plotting kobs against the inhibitor concentrations and fitting to equation (2) gave apparent kon 5.7 ± 0.2 × 104 M−1s−1 (Fig. 2C). The apparent Kiapp of DPLG-2 against Mtb20SOG was determined to be 24.2 ± 0.9 nM by plotting Vi/V0 against inhibitor concentration and fitting to equation (3) (Fig. 2D). This agreed well with the Kiapp 26.3 nM calculated from koff/kon. The Ki 15 nM was then calculated from equation (4). DPLG-2 was 4-fold more potent against Mtb20SOG than ML9, with greater species selectivity (4670-fold) (ki vs human c-20S 70 μM) (Table 2). The underlying reason for the change of mechanism from rapid-equilibrium to slow-binding inhibition is under investigation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

DPLG-2 is a time-dependent inhibitor of the Mtb20S. (A) The proteolytic activity of Mtb20SOG (0.28 nM) with substrate suc-LLVY-AMC (50 $M) (curve I) following the addition of DPLG-2 (curve II) or ML9 (curve III) at 100 nM. (B) Progress curve of hydrolysis of suc-LLVY-AMC by Mtb20SOG in the presence of DPLG-2. (C) Plot of kobs to DPLG-2 concentrations. (D) Plot of Vi/V0 vs inhibitor concentrations.

Table 2.

Selectivity of ML2, ML9 and DPLG-2 for Mtb over human c-20S β5c and i-20S β5i

ID Ki μM
Ki(β5c)Ki(Mtb)
Ki(β5i)Ki(Mtb)
Mtb20SOG β5c β5i
ML2 0.030 3.63 0.82 121 27
ML9 0.063 > 100 26.3 > 1590 417
DPLG-2 0.015 70 54.7 4670 3650

Availability of crystal structures allowed us to compare the binding pockets of Mtb20S and eukaryotic proteasomes. As shown in Fig. 3, the S3 binding pocket of the Mtb20S differs significantly from that of yeast 20S, mouse c-20S and mouse i-20S. The P3-neopentyl asparagine residue of ML16 perfectly fits into the S3 site of the mammalian proteasomes (Fig. 3A, C, D) but poorly in the S3 site of the Mtb proteasome (Fig. 3B). Although the S1 binding pockets of the Mtb20S and the c-20S are substantially different, they are similar between the Mtb20S and the i-20S, and both proteasomes were shown to prefer larger aromatic groups at P1 position of the N-acetyl tripeptide-AMC substrates (Fig. S3).11,17 To test if dipeptides that were selective for the Mtb proteasome over the human constitutive proteasome were comparably poor inhibitors of the human i-20S, we measured IC50’s and converted them to Ki’s as above for selected compounds (Table 2). In agreement with the structural analysis, ML9 and DPLG-2 inhibited human i-20S β5i poorly with Ki 26.3 μM and 54.7 μM, respectively. However, ML2 showed potent inhibitory activity against i-20S with Ki 0.82 μM. Given that both ML9 and DPLG-2 have same P3 N,N-diethylamide moiety, whereas ML2 has a P3 pyrrolidinylamide moiety, which is much less bulky, it indicates that the S3 binding pocket dictates the species selectivity between Mtb20S and both human c-20S and i-20S, and an acyclic, fully substituted Asn side chain is required for selectivity against both the c-20S and the i-20S. The shift to a slow-binding mechanism suggests that binding may stabilize an altered conformation. Consistent with this, the P1-naphthyl moiety cannot be docked into the crystallographically determined S1 pocket of the Mtb20S (Fig. S4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of the S3 binding pockets between yeast c-20S, Mtb20S, mouse c-20S, and mouse i-20S. The solved co-crystal structure of yeast 20S and ML16 (3MG8) is shown in A), while Mtb20S (2FHG) in B), mouse c-20S (3UNB) in C), mouse i-20S (3UNF) in D) were superimpositions on the solved structure. Figures were made using MacPyMOL (DeLano Scientific, Palo Alto, CA).

To test if the dipeptides were mycobactericidal toward non-replicating Mtb under nitrosative stress, we incubated Mtb in 0.5 mM NaNO2 at pH 5.5 in Sauton’s medium overnight and then added dipeptides at indicated concentrations for 5 or 11 days (Fig. 4A). ML2, ML9 and DPLG-2 were cidal, with up to 1 log10 reduction in colony-forming units after 5 days and up to 2.2 log10 of killing after 11 days, at concentrations that were greater than twice their Ki’s. Above 100 nM, there was no significant increase in the extent of killing when the concentrations of the inhibitors were increased to 25 μM. Killing was dependent on dose (Fig. 4A inset), nitrosative stress (Fig. S5A, B) and prcBA (Fig. S5C). The incomplete extent of killing phenocopied the Mtb prcBA knockout over the same time period in non-replicating conditions.8,9 That the bacteria were not completely eradicated mirrors the action of many other compounds active on non-replicating Mtb, eg Dlat inhibitor18 and rifampin (not shown). As discussed in the Supporting Information, treatment with N,C-capped dipeptides did not phenocopy prcBA deficiency competely, perhaps because the dipeptides did not inhibit the proteasome completely. In contrast to 1,3,4-oxathiazol-2-ones, DPLG-2 was stable in human plasma over 22 hours (Fig. S6).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

N,C-dipeptides inhibit mycobacterial proteasomes and kill non-replicating Mtb. A) Killing of Mtb H37Rv in Sauton’s medium with 0.5 mM NaNO2 at pH 5.5, which mimics the nitroxidative stress that limits the replication of Mtb in mice.13 Data are means of triplicates in one of at least three experiments. Inset: DPLG-2 kills Mtb in the presence of NaNO2 at pH 5.5 in a dose-dependent manner. B) BCG cells were incubated with DPLG-2 at indicated concentrations for 4 hours prior to addition of HT1171 and incubated for an additional hour. Proteasome activity in lysates was tested with suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate. Data are means of triplicates of three experiments.

Ability to kill Mtb provided strong evidence that the dipeptides entered the bacteria, but this would be difficult to confirm by testing for proteasome inhibition in lysates prepared from dipeptide-treated Mtb, because binding would be reversed when the cells were washed and lysed. To circumvent this problem, we devised a competition assay, in which we took advantage of HT1171, an oxathiazolone that can enter Mtb and inhibit its proteasome irreversibly.12 We reasoned that if the dipeptides could prevent the inhibition of the Mtb proteasome inside intact mycobacteria by HT1171, this would indicate that the dipeptides had penetrated the mycobacteria and bound to the proteasome active site. Mid-log phase cells of M. bovis strain BCG were incubated with DPLG-2 at indicated concentrations for 4 hours prior to addition of HT1171 (25 μM) for a further 1 hour. Cells were washed extensively to remove unbound inhibitors of both types. The proteasomal activities of the lysates (Fig. 4B) were determined as reported.12 In the absence of DPLG-2 or in the presence of concentrations of DPLG-2 (1 μM) that were low relative to HT1171 (25 μM), HT1171 inhibited the proteasomes irreversibly, as before. However, 10 μM and 50 μM of DPLG-2 were able to shield the mycobacterial proteasome active sites from HT1171. Thus, DPLG-2 could penetrate mycobacteria and bind to proteasome active sites in situ. Efforts to conduct a similar competition experiment with Me4BodipyFL-Ahx3Leu3VS were not possible, as that probe afforded only 8% inhibition of the Mtb proteasome, in accord with earlier work.11

In summary, we have identified a series of N,C-capped dipeptides that are highly selective for the Mtb proteasome over both human constitutive and human immunoproteasomes and can penetrate Mtb to exert cidal activity against non-replicating bacteria under nitrosative stress. After oxathiazolones, N,C-capped dipeptides are only the second class of compounds to show a high degree of selectivity for the proteasome of a pathogen over that of its host. Selectivity was achieved in a novel way, by exploiting that the S3 binding pocket is shallow and wide between 2 β subunits in Mtb20S, but narrow and deep between β5 and β6 in human c-20S and between β5i and β6 i-20S, as well as that the S1 binding pocket accommodates large aromatic rings in Mtb 20S but not in human c-20S. A further novelty emerged within the class of N,C-capped dipeptides, in that replacement of P1 phenyl with a naphthyl ring resulted in a change of the inhibition modality from rapid equilibrium to a time-dependent mechanism and increased the residence time of the inhibitor in its binding site, an important goal in drug development for non-covalent inhibitors.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiuju Jiang for BSL3 technical support. Supported by NIH R56AI080618 (CN), 1R21AI101393 (GL), and the Milstein Program in Chemical Biology of Infectious Diseases. The Department of Microbiology and Immunology is supported by the William Randolph Hearst Foundation.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supporting Information. Reagents, assays, synthesis, Scheme S1, and Figures S1–6. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Contributor Information

Gang Lin, Email: gal2005@med.cornell.edu.

Carl Nathan, Email: cnathan@med.cornell.edu.

References

  • 1.Baumeister W, Walz J, Zuhl F, Seemuller E. Cell. 1998;92:367. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80929-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brown MG, Driscoll J, Monaco JJ. Nature. 1991;353:355. doi: 10.1038/353355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Glynne R, Powis SH, Beck S, Kelly A, Kerr LA, Trowsdale J. Nature. 1991;353:357. doi: 10.1038/353357a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kelly A, Powis SH, Glynne R, Radley E, Beck S, Trowsdale J. Nature. 1991;353:667. doi: 10.1038/353667a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kincaid EZ, Che JW, York I, Escobar H, Reyes-Vargas E, Delgado JC, Welsh RM, Karow ML, Murphy AJ, Valenzuela DM, Yancopoulos GD, Rock KL. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:129. doi: 10.1038/ni.2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lin G, Hu G, Tsu C, Kunes YZ, Li H, Dick L, Parsons T, Li P, Chen Z, Zwickl P, Weich N, Nathan C. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:1405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Darwin KH, Ehrt S, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Weich N, Nathan CF. Science. 2003;302:1963. doi: 10.1126/science.1091176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gandotra S, Lebron MB, Ehrt S. PLoS Pathogens. 2010;6:e1001040. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gandotra S, Schnappinger D, Monteleone M, Hillen W, Ehrt S. Nat Med. 2007;13:1515. doi: 10.1038/nm1683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nathan C, Gold B, Lin G, Stegman M, de Carvalho LP, Vandal O, Venugopal A, Bryk R. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2008;88(Suppl 1):S25. doi: 10.1016/S1472-9792(08)70034-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin G, Tsu C, Dick L, Zhou XK, Nathan C. J Bio Chem. 2008;283:34423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805324200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin G, Li D, de Carvalho LP, Deng H, Tao H, Vogt G, Wu K, Schneider J, Chidawanyika T, Warren JD, Li H, Nathan C. Nature. 2009;461:621. doi: 10.1038/nature08357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.MacMicking JD, North RJ, LaCourse R, Mudgett JS, Shah SK, Nathan CF. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nathan C. Science. 2006;312:1874. doi: 10.1126/science.312.5782.1874b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kruger E, Kloetzel PM. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24:77. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huber EM, Basler M, Schwab R, Heinemeyer W, Kirk CJ, Groettrup M, Groll M. Cell. 2012;148:727. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blackburn C, Gigstad KM, Hales P, Garcia K, Jones M, Bruzzese FJ, Barrett C, Liu JX, Soucy TA, Sappal DS, Bump N, Olhava EJ, Fleming P, Dick LR, Tsu C, Sintchak MD, Blank JL. Biochem J. 2010;430:461. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bryk R, Gold B, Venugopal A, Singh J, Samy R, Pupek K, Cao H, Popescu C, Gurney M, Hotha S, Cherian J, Rhee K, Ly L, Converse PJ, Ehrt S, Vandal O, Jiang X, Schneider J, Lin G, Nathan C. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3:137. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES