Abstract
Aim
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether levels of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors could explain observed differences in the prevalence of childhood obesity in a sample of Greek children.
Methods
Epidemiological study. PA and sedentary behaviors were assessed by a self-administrated physical activity checklist. BMI was calculated from measured weight and height. A representative sample of Greek children aged 10 to 12 years attending fifth and sixth grade (N=3,195), living in rural and urban areas were enrolled. Maturation status was not evaluated due to technical reasons.
Results
Prevalence of obesity was higher among children living in rural areas as compared with urban areas (12.1% vs. 10.7%, p<0.01). Surprisingly, children living in rural areas had higher levels of self reported PA (p<0.001) and met current PA guidelines to a greater extent than their urban counterparts (p<0.05). Furthermore, boys had higher levels of total, light-to-moderate intensity and vigorous intensity PA (VPA), as well as sedentary behaviors, than girls (all p-values <0.05). Stratified analysis by BMI category revealed that normal weight boys and girls had higher levels of total PA and VPA compared with overweight and obese boys from the same type of setting (all p-values<0.05).
Conclusions
Children living in rural areas have higher levels of PA and more frequently met PA guidelines than their urban counterparts, despite a higher prevalence of obesity.
Keywords: children, obesity, physical activity, rural, urban
Introduction
The prevalence of childhood obesity in Greece has increased by approximately 50% in the last decade. At present, over 40% of children are overweight and obese.1 In a recent study, we found area of living played a significant role in the obesity status of Greek children; those living in rural areas are more likely to be obese than their urban counterparts.2 Surprisingly, the same study reveals that children living in rural areas are nevertheless fitter that urban children.2 Body weight regulation depends on many factors. Access to energy rich food and PA levels constitute the major environmental factors implicated in the regulation of body weight. Differences in PA levels may, therefore, at least in part explain our recent finding that children living in rural areas are more overweight and obese compared to their urban counterparts.3 Based on the findings that the area of living (e.g., urban vs. rural) may affect access to sports facilities and opportunities for PA,4 researchers have recognized the environment as a determinant of lifestyle behaviours.5 Environmental factors such as public open space and higher “walkability” scores can influence PA levels and obesity.6, 7 In Greece, rural areas, defined as those with less than 5,000 inhabitants and low population density, provide more opportunities for outdoor play and non-compulsory PA.
To the best of our knowledge, only one study in a small, non-representative sample of children has examined the relationship between PA and obesity levels in Greek children.8 The aim of the present study was to examine the hypothesis that Greek children living in rural areas are more overweight and obese than their urban counterparts because of lower levels of PA.
Methods
Participants’ recruitment and procedure
Population data was derived from a national, school-based, follow-up health survey.2 A total of 3,195 children (1,602 from the 5th grade and 1,593 from the 6th grade) participated in the study. Five hundred and eighty four children (18.2%) were recruited from rural areas and 2,611 children (81.8%) were recruited from urban areas. Anthropometric, physical activity and sedentary behavior data, and information about age, gender and area of living were collected from children in 70 elementary public and private schools randomly selected from throughout the country. To avoid potential seasonal effects on PA, assessments were performed between September 10 and June 15 (when all schools of Primary Education in Greece are required to operate). The schools were sampled from 28 prefectures of Greece, representing over 85% of the population. The sampling procedure assured a proportional enrolment of children from urban / rural areas (i.e., flat, mountainous and island locations). Distribution between rural and urban areas was based on the Hellenic National Statistics Service criteria (consensus 2001).9 Areas with less than 5,000 inhabitants and a mean population density of 27 habitants per square kilometer were considered rural.9
Physical Activity Self - Report
Physical activity was assessed by use of the translated version of the Self-Administrated Physical Activity Checklist (SAPAC), 10 with some minor modification for activities most commonly performed by Greek children. In this respect, baseball/softball and American football, sports not common in Greece, were excluded from the questionnaire. Instead, activities such as hand-ball, skiing and martial arts were listed. The SAPAC consisted of 21 activities for which children were asked to report the number of minutes they spent in each activity during the previous day. The day was separated into three time periods: before, during and after school. For every reported activity, children also reported whether it caused them “to breathe hard or feel tired, none, some or most of the time” providing a subjective estimation of intensity. Additionally, children reported the minutes they spent watching TV / DVD / video and playing games on the TV / computer / mobile phones during the previous day (before and after school). Children completed the questionnaire in the classroom supervised by one of the authors (KDT) who gave a small presentation to improve the accuracy of data reporting. Children were asked to read the completed questionnaire twice and the researcher provided assistance as needed. We have previously reported this questionnaire to have moderate to good reliability (r>0.85, p<0.001) and validity (r=0.31 to 0.37, p<0.001).11
Study approval
The Ministry of Education of Greece granted approval for the health survey. Parents were notified in writing in advance and had the option to deny participation of their children.
Anthropometric measurements
The same investigator (KDT) measured the height and weight of all children in the study. Weight was measured without shoes using an electronic scale (Body Fat Monitor Scale, TANITA BF-522W, Tokyo, Japan) with a precision of 100 g. Standing height was determined to the nearest 0.5 cm (Leicester Height Measurement, TANITA, Tokyo, Japan) with the child’s weight being equally distributed on the two feet, head back and buttock on the vertical land of the height gauge. BMI cut-off points were used by age and gender category (according to IOTF) for underweight, normal weight,12 overweight, and obese,13 as the most proper for epidemiologic studies.
Data processing and statistical analysis
All physical activities in the SAPAC were first coded in Metabolic Equivalent (MET) values using the original scoring system.10, 14 Physical activities were classified as light to moderate intensity (LMPA) when MET<5.9, moderate to vigorous intensity (MVPA) when MET≥2.9 and vigorous intensity (VPA) when MET≥5.9. The minutes of each reported activity were multiplied by the respective MET value to obtain the weighted activity MET score.
Descriptive information on anthropometric measurements, self-reported physical activity indicators and sedentary behaviors are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) or as percentages. Children were classified as “active commuters” if they walked or biked to and from school and “passive commuters” if they were driven to and from school. Additionally, children were stratified by whether or not they met recommended activity levels. Children who participated in MVPA at least for 60 minutes per day were considered as meeting the recommendations for PA level.11 Differences of PA sub- components between genders and areas of living were assessed using independent samples t-test. Comparisons of categorical variables (i.e., gender, areas and BMI categories) were performed using the Pearson’s chi-square test. Comparisons between differences of mean values of normally distributed variables between BMI categories were tested using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). To evaluate the differences between two specific BMI categories, we applied post hoc analysis using the Bonferroni correction rule to adjust for the inflation of Type I error. As the data were normally distributed, the associations between PA sub-components and BMI were tested using linear regression analysis, adjusted for school grade level, kind of school and day of study. Normality of residuals, homoscedacity and serial dependency were graphically assessed through Q-Q plots. All analyses were performed using the SPSS version 18.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance level from two-sided hypotheses was accepted at the 5% level (p≤0.05).
Results
Mean values for the participants’ descriptive characteristics and for each activity measurement were tabulated by gender and area of living (Table 1). Obesity rates were 1.4% higher in rural than urban areas for both genders (p-values<0.05) aged 10 to 12 years (Table 1). Moreover, the prevalence of overweight (including obese) rural children (40.2%) did not differ significantly from that of their urban counterparts (38.5%). Rural children of both sexes reported higher levels of total PA, LMPA and total MET score than their urban counterparts, while a greater proportion of rural vs. urban children met current PA guidelines (Table 1). Similarly, when we compared children by area of living, we found that rural children had significantly higher total PA (138±60 min/d) and LMPA (93±54 min/d) compared to urban children (118±56 min/d and 73±54 min/d, respectively), p-values<0.001; for the two groups, VPA was similar (45±44 min/d vs. 45±40 min/d, p=0.42). Furthermore, when we calculated LMPA by time conducted (before, during and after school), we found that rural children had more LMPA after school (73±58 min/d vs. 51±45 min/d, p<0.0001), but the amount of LMPA conducted before and during school did not differ significantly between the two groups. The higher LMPA of rural children was undertaking in the form of free games (e.g., chase, tag, hopscotch), outdoor play (e.g., climbing trees, hide and seek) and outdoor and indoor chores. Gender-specific analysis within the same area of living (rural or urban) revealed that boys had higher levels of total PA, VPA and sedentary behaviours than girls (all p-values<0.05). Stratified data analysis by BMI category between rural and urban children (Table 2) showed that rural boys and girls from the same BMI category reported more total PA and LMPA than their urban counterparts (all p-values<0.05). The total amount of self reported PA (p<0.001), LMPA (p<0.001), VPA (p<0.001) and active transportation to school (p<0.05) were inversely associated with BMI levels, in both boys and girls living in urban areas. In rural boys, an inverse relationship between BMI and total amount of PA (Beta=−0.26, p<0.001) and VPA (Beta=−0.28, p<0.001) was observed; for girls, the association between BMI and total PA was less prominent (Beta=−0.19, p=0.05) (Table 3).
Table 1.
Boys | Girls | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Rural (n=292) | Urban (n=1343) | All (n=1635) | Rural (n=292) | Urban (n=1268) | All (n=1560) | |
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
Age (y) | 11.0 (1.0) | 11.0 (1.0) | 11.0 (1.0) | 11.0 (1.0) | 11.0 (1.0) | 11.0 (1.0) |
Weight (kg) | 48.7 (11.2) | 47.7 (11.6) | 47.9 (11.5) | 48.6 (10.5) | 48.0 (10.7) | 48.0 (10.7) |
Height (cm) | 151.0 (7.9) | 149.9 (8.6) | 150.1 (8.5) | 151.2 (7.9) | 150.4 (8.2) | 150.6 (8.1) |
BMI (kg/m2) | 21.2 (3.5) | 21.1 (3.8) | 21.1 (3.8) | 21.3 (3.5) | 21.1 (3.7) | 21.1 (3.6) |
Overweight (%) | 28.3 | 27.9 | 28.0 | 27.9 | 27.7 | 27.7 |
Obese (%) | 12.5† | 11.1 | 11.5 | 11.7† | 10.3 | 10.6 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 73.8 (11.0) | 73.5 (11.6) | 73.5 (11.2) | 72.2 (11.6) | 71.8 (11.2) | 71.9 (11.1) |
Total PA (min/d) | 142 (58)*† | 124 (54)* | 127 (55) | 133 (52)† | 112 (56) | 116 (56) |
Light to moderate PA (min/d) | 83 (42)*† | 60 (44)* | 64 (42) | 103 (48)† | 86 (52) | 89 (52) |
Vigorous PA (min/d) | 60 (37)* | 64 (44)* | 63 (43) | 29 (27) | 27 (32) | 27 (32) |
Total MET’s score (MET) | 746 (325)*† | 678 (327)* | 690 (328) | 640 (264)† | 530 (288) | 550 (284) |
Sedentary behaviours (min/d) | 154 (91)* | 150 (87)* | 151 (86) | 139 (83) | 140 (84) | 139 (83) |
Active transportation to school | 37.7 | 48.5† | 46.6 | 36.6 | 51.1† | 48.3 |
Meeting recommended PA§ | 81.5*† | 70.7* | 72.5 | 71.6† | 52.9 | 57.1 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequencies (%); BMI, body mass index; PA, physical activity; MET, metabolic equivalent.
Recommended activity level ≥ 60 min of moderate to vigorous PA daily.
P<0.05 for differences between sexes within the same area (i.e., rural or urban),
P<0.001 between different areas (rural vs. urban) by sex (i.e., boys or girls).
Table 2.
Boys | Thinness grades 1–3; (n=143) | Normal weight (n=1721) | Overweight (n=955) | Obese (n=366) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rural | Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | Urban | |
Mean SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
Total PA (min/d) | 166 (86) | 138 (76) | 153 | 138 (60)* | 130 (59)† | 115 (51) | 123 (57)† | 97 (44) |
Light to moderate PA | 100 (66)† | 93 (55) | 86 (50)† | 74 (49)* | 79 (46)† | 59 (43) | 77 (46)† | 55 (40) |
Vigorous PA (min/d) | 66 (48) | 45 (41) | 67 (39)* | 64 (45)* | 52 (41) | 56 (39) | 46 (39) | 42 (33) |
Sedentary behaviours | 54 (54) | 148 (120) | 109 (66)* | 113 (78)* | 172 (88) | 166 (87) | 239 (65) | 219 (71) |
Active transportation to | 60 | 58 | 42 | 49 | 35 | 42 | 32† | 44 |
Girls | ||||||||
Total PA (min/d) | 107 (14) | 125 (56) | 142 | 122 (58)* | 124 (52)† | 107 (54) | 109 (51)† | 88 (41) |
Light to moderate PA | 76 (16) | 99 (57) | 105 (66)† | 90 (53)‡ | 95 (47)† | 80 (52) | 94 (45)† | 73 (40) |
Vigorous PA (min/d) | 31 (28) | 26 (33) | 37 (32)‡ | 32 (35)* | 29 (27) | 27 (31 | 15 (18) | 15 (24) |
Sedentary behaviours | 84 (67) | 113 (83) | 118 | 97 (72)* | 143 (82) | 154 (81) | 216 (61) | 214 (76) |
Active transportation to | 55† | 41 | 43 | 49 | 39† | 49 | 40 | 47 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequencies (%); BMI, body mass index; PA, physical activity;
P<0.05 for differences between normal weight and overweight, obese (rural or urban);
P<0.001 for differences between rural and urban areas in the same BMI group
P<0.01 for differences between normal weight and obese (rural or urban).
Table 3.
BMI | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Rural | Urban | |||||||
Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | |||||
Beta | p | Beta | p | Beta | p | Beta | p | |
| ||||||||
Total PA (min/d) | −0.26 | <0.001 | −0.19 | 0.050 | −0.30 | <0.00 | −0.25 | <0.001 |
Light to moderate PA(min/d) | −0.06 | 0.330 | −0.07 | 0.242 | −0.14 | <0.00 | −0.15 | <0.001 |
Vigorous PA (min/d) | −0.28 | <0.001 | −0.07 | 0.221 | −0.26 | <0.00 | −0.20 | <0.001 |
Active transportation to school (min/d) | 0.05 | 0.581 | 0.14 | 0.139 | −0.08 | 0.06 | −0.11 | 0.012 |
BMI, body mass index; PA, physical activity; Adjusted for school grade (fifth or sixth), school (public or private) and day of study (weekday or weekend).
Discussion
The present study reveals that Greek children living in rural areas reported higher levels of PA compared to their urban counterparts, despite an increased prevalence of overweight and obesity. This finding is in accord with our previous report2 that rural children are fitter than urban ones. However, it does not support our hypothesis that rural children are more overweight and obese because they engage in less PA. On the contrary, self-reported PA was significantly higher in rural children.
The data presented here was derived from a follow-up study in a representative sample of 8 to 9 year old children who participated in an earlier study.2 The results from this study suggested that rural children had higher levels of obesity but performed better in aerobic fitness, agility and strength than their urban counterparts.2 The present finding — that rural children have higher levels of PA — explains the better fitness level of these children over urban children. Total or moderate to vigorous intensity PA has been implicated as a contributing factor in improved children’s aerobic fitness.16
The area of living (e.g., rural vs. urban) may determine, at least partly, access to sports facilities and opportunities for physical activity.4 Our results confirm the notion that rural environments promote higher levels of PA than urban environments, as we found that children living in rural areas spent significantly more time after school in LMPA, mainly in free games (e.g., chase, tag, hopscotch), outdoor play (e.g., climbing trees, hide and seek) and outdoor and indoor chores. Our main finding is consistent with the findings of most recent studies of the total amount of PA in urban and rural children.17–21 Self-reported surveys from U.S.A.17, 18 and Canada21 concluded that urban children were less physically active than rural ones. Furthermore, results of studies from the United Kingdom19 and Switzerland,20 which have assessed PA via accelometers, agree with the latter observation. In contrast, Huang et al., 2010, 22 using the same questionnaire as in the present study, concluded that Taiwanese urban children reported a greater total amount of PA than rural children.
Significantly, post-hoc analysis did not reveal significant differences in low to moderate PA between obese, overweight and normal weight children from rural areas. From the public health perspective, this is a hopeful message for overweight and obese children. Our target should be to motivate obese children to be more active, creating an encouraging environment for participation in PA and sports at school and other settings without competition and stress.23 Obese children may be less enthusiastic to participate in vigorous intensity PA because of fear of reduced performance and stigmatization by their counterparts; they may also be restricted from participating in higher intensity PA because of fear of musculoskeletal injury.24 Interestingly, the proportion of active transportation to school is significantly lower in rural than in urban children, despite their greater levels of LMPA and total PA. In recent years, the Greek Ministry of Education has merged schools from small villages into larger regional schools to which children must be bussed. This social change may explain the low rates of active transportation to school.
Finally, our data show that, compared to boys, girls reported lower total PA and sub-components of PA (all p-values<0.05). These results are in agreement with those from a recent study of children from 41 countries (including Greece), which concluded that girls reported less PA than boys and fewer girls reach the threshold of ≥60 min/d MVPA recommended for optimal health.25
At first sight, the finding that children living in rural areas had higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness and PA despite their higher prevalence of obesity may appear paradoxical. Apart from physical activity and fitness, other factors not assessed here (e.g., energy intake, maturity, genetic predisposition to obesity, etc.) seem to play a significant role in the regulation of body weight in children. Differences in dietary habits could influence rural-urban differences in obesity status.26 In countries like Greece, nutrition transition may have contributed to the increase in obesity prevalence. This transition may have occurred earlier in urban areas. Other possible predisposing factors include lower socio-economic status,5 an accepted determinative factor of obesity in established market economies. The level of sexual maturation is well-established to affect childhood obesity and PA levels. Sexual maturation is associated positively with childhood obesity in girls but negatively in boys,27 so sex-related differences in maturity status may affect PA levels during adolescence.28, 29 Sexual maturation was not assessed in our study and therefore we cannot delineate its role in the observed differences between genders in PA or obesity levels.
Study limitations include the fact that we used self-report questionnaires. Widely used due to their convenience and low cost, these questionnaires cannot provide an accurate estimation of type and duration of physical activity, and they may not record habitual physical activity adequately. Moreover, the cross-sectional design of our study cannot establish causal relationships but only provide hypotheses for further investigation.
In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that area of residence has a significant effect on self-reported physical activity and obesity status among 10 to 12 year old Greek children. As rural children had higher levels of PA and met PA guidelines to a greater extent than their urban counterparts, despite their increased prevalence of obesity, further work should focus on other causes of their obesity levels. A positive finding of the present study is that rural obese children reported similar degree of participation in LMPA as children in other BMI categories. This is encouraging, especially in view of our recent finding that aerobic fitness in young children has decreased significantly over the past 10 years.30 We obviously need to further encourage participation in physical activity and promote healthy eating, to protect the health of our children.
‘What this paper adds’ boxes.
1: What is already known in this topic?
The prevalence of childhood overweight/obesity in Greece has increased alarmingly in the last decade, while it seems that children living in rural areas are more overweight and obese than their urban counterparts.
Only one small study has examined the relationship between PA and obesity levels in Greek children, by rural/urban status. It is thus of great interest to examine, in a large, representative sample of Greek children, the hypothesis that children living in rural areas may have higher obesity rates because of lower levels of PA compared to their urban counterparts.
2: What this paper adds
Greek children living in rural areas reported higher levels of PA and more frequently met current PA levels than their urban counterparts, despite being more overweight and obese. From the data, it appears that PA may not be directly associated with obesity.
Statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences in low to moderate PA between obese, overweight and normal weight children from rural areas. From the public health perspective, this is a hopeful message for overweight and obese children.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Graduate Program, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics of Harokopio University, the Hellenic Atherosclerosis Society, the Hellenic Heart Foundation, Nestlé Hellas S.A. and the OPAP S.A. Support also came from the Institute for Translational Sciences at the University of Texas Medical Branch (supported in part by a Clinical and Translational Science Award UL1RR029876 from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health), the Shriners Hospital for Children (SSF 84090) and from the Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. The authors thank Dr Sarah Toombs Smith for editorial assistance.
Footnotes
Authors’ contributions: KT designed the study, performed the data collection and analysis and wrote the paper. DP and SK participated in the design of the study and critically reviewed the paper. SP participated in the data collection and interpretation. LS was involved in the study design, manuscript writing and in overall supervision of the study.
References
- 1.Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Kavouras SA, et al. Prevalence Trends of Obesity in Greek Children: First Evidence that Prevalence of Obesity Is Levelling Off. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18:161–6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Sidossis LS. Greek children living in rural areas are heavier but fitter compared to their urban counterparts. A comparative, time-series (1997–2008) analysis. J Rural Health. 2011;27:270–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Parks SE, Housemann RA, Brownson RC. Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:29–35. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Vries SI, Bakker I, van Mechelen W, Hopman-Rock M. Determinants of activity-friendly neighborhoods for children: results from the SPACE study. Am J Health Promot. 2007;21:312–316. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Papas MA, Alberg AJ, Ewing R, et al. The built environment and obesity. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:129–143. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roemmich JN, Epstein LH, Raja S, et al. Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Prev Med. 2006;43:437–441. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kamtsios S, Digelidis N. Physical activity levels, exercise attitudes, self-perceptions and BMI type of 11 to 12-year-old children. J Child Health Care. 2008;12:232–40. doi: 10.1177/1367493508092510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Services HS. [Accessed July 21, 2010];Demographic, economic and household data. 2001 V Available at: http://www.statistics.gr/portal/page/portal/ESYE. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sallis JF, Strikmiller PK, Harsha DW, et al. Validation of interviewer- and self-administered physical activity checklists for fifth grade students. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1996;28:840–51. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199607000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gioxari A, Kavouras SA, Tambalis KD, et al. Reliability and criterion validity of the Self-Administered Physical Activity Checklist in Greek children. Eur J Sports Sci. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2011.606838. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA. Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. BMJ. 2007;335:194. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39238.399444.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000;32:S498–504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.U.S Department of Health and Human Services. [Accessed August 22, 2010];Guidelines for Physical Activity for Americans. 2008 http://www.health.gov/PAGuidelines.
- 16.Ruiz JR, Rizzo NS, Hurtig-Wennlöf A, Ortega FB, Wärnberg J, Sjöström M. Relations of total physical activity and intensity to fitness and fatness in children: the European Youth Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:299–303. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McMurray RG, Harrell JS, Bangdiwala SI, Deng S. Cardiovascular disease risk factors and obesity of rural and urban elementary school children. J Rural Health. 1999;15:365–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1999.tb00760.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu J, Bennett KJ, Harun N, Probst JC. Urban-rural differences in overweight status and physical inactivity among US children aged 10–17 years. J Rural Health. 2008;24:407–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kriemler S, Manser-Wenger S, Zahner L, Braun-Fahrländer C, Schindler C, Puder JJ. Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, low physical activity and an urban environment are independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk in children. Diabetologia. 2008;51:1408–1415. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1067-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jones AP, Coombes EG, Griffin SJ, van Sluijs EM. Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using Global Positioning Systems. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Simen-Kapeu A, Kuhle S, Veugelers PJ. Geographic differences in childhood overweight, physical activity, nutrition and neighbourhood facilities: implications for prevention. Can J Public Health. 2010;101:128–32. doi: 10.1007/BF03404357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huang SJ, Hung WC, Sharpe PA, Wai JP. Neighbourhood environment and physical activity among urban and rural schoolchildren in Taiwan. Health Place. 2010;16:470–6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hayman LL, Meininger JC, Daniels SR, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in nursing practice: focus on children and youth: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2007;116:344–57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.184595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nantel J, Mathieu ME, Prince FJ. Physical activity and obesity: biomechanical and physiological key concepts. J Obes. 2011;2011:650230. doi: 10.1155/2011/650230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haug E, Rasmussen M, Samdal O, et al. Overweight in school-aged children and its relationship with demographic and lifestyle factors: results from the WHO-Collaborative Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. Int J Public Health. 2009;54:167–79. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-5408-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ara I, Moreno LA, Leiva MT, et al. Adiposity, physical activity, and physical fitness among children from Aragon, Spain. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:1918–1924. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Y. Is obesity associated with early sexual maturation? A comparison of the association in American boys versus girls. Pediatrics. 2002;110:903–10. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cumming SP, Standage M, Gillison F, Malina RM. Sex differences in exercise behavior during adolescence: is biological maturation a confounding factor? J Adolesc Health. 2008;42:480–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Drenowatz C, Eisenmann JC, Pfeiffer KA, et al. Maturity-related differences in physical activity among 10- to 12-year-old girls. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22:18–22. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Psarra G, Sidossis LS. Inverse, but independent trends in obesity and fitness levels among Greek children: a time-series analysis from 1997 to 2007. Obes Facts. 2011;4:165–74. doi: 10.1159/000327994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]