Abstract
BACKGROUND
Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia is a genetically heterogeneous disorder with three variants: types 1, 2, and 3. Type 1 is due to loss-of-function mutations of the calcium-sensing receptor, a guanine nucleotide–binding protein (G-protein)–coupled receptor that signals through the G-protein subunit α11 (Gα11). Type 3 is associated with adaptor-related protein complex 2, sigma 1 subunit (AP2S1) mutations, which result in altered calcium-sensing receptor endocytosis. We hypothesized that type 2 is due to mutations effecting Gα11 loss of function, since Gα11 is involved in calcium-sensing receptor signaling, and its gene (GNA11) and the type 2 locus are colocalized on chromosome 19p13.3. We also postulated that mutations effecting Gα11 gain of function, like the mutations effecting calcium-sensing receptor gain of function that cause autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1, may lead to hypocalcemia.
METHODS
We performed GNA11 mutational analysis in a kindred with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 and in nine unrelated patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia who did not have mutations in the gene encoding the calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) or AP2S1. We also performed this analysis in eight unrelated patients with hypocalcemia who did not have CASR mutations. In addition, we studied the effects of GNA11 mutations on Gα11 protein structure and calcium-sensing receptor signaling in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells.
RESULTS
The kindred with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 had an in-frame deletion of a conserved Gα11 isoleucine (Ile200del), and one of the nine unrelated patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia had a missense GNA11 mutation (Leu135Gln). Missense GNA11 mutations (Arg181Gln and Phe341Leu) were detected in two unrelated patients with hypocalcemia; they were therefore identified as having autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2. All four GNA11 mutations predicted disrupted protein structures, and assessment on the basis of in vitro expression showed that familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated mutations decreased the sensitivity of cells expressing calcium-sensing receptors to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations, whereas autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–associated mutations increased cell sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS
Gα11 mutants with loss of function cause familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2, and Gα11 mutants with gain of function cause a clinical disorder designated as autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2. (Funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council and others.)
Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia, an autosomal dominant disorder, is characterized by lifelong elevations of serum calcium concentrations with low urinary calcium excretion (mean urinary calcium:creatinine clearance ratio, <0.01) and normal circulating parathyroid hormone concentrations in 80% of patients (see Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org).1-3 Patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia are generally asymptomatic, although pancreatitis or chondrocalcinosis may develop in some affected adults.4 Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia is genetically heterogeneous, with three reported variants. Type 1 is due to loss-of-function mutations of the calcium-sensing receptor (encoded by CASR), type 2 is of unknown cause, and type 3 is associated with adaptor-related protein complex 2, sigma 1 subunit (AP2S1) mutations, which alter calcium-sensing receptor endocytosis.2,5 The calcium-sensing receptor is a widely expressed guanine nucleotide–binding protein (G-protein)–coupled receptor that has a pivotal role in extracellular calcium homeostasis as regulated by the parathyroids and kidneys. For example, activation of the calcium-sensing receptor as a result of elevated extra-cellular calcium concentrations causes G-protein–dependent stimulation of phospholipase C activity, through Gq and G11, which results in an accumulation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and an increase in intracellular calcium concentrations. These changes, in turn, lead to reduced circulating parathyroid hormone concentrations and increased urinary calcium excretion.4,6
We hypothesized that since familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia types 1 and 3 are due to abnormalities of the signaling pathway of the calcium-sensing receptor, type 2 may also involve this pathway and be due to mutation of G-protein subunit α11 (Gα11), which is encoded by GNA11, for three reasons. First, Gα11 is involved in calcium-sensing receptor signaling in parathyroid and renal cells. Second, GNA11 and the familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 locus are colocalized on chromosome 19p13.3. Finally, hypercalcemia develops in mice that have parathyroid-specific deletions encompassing the genes Gna11 and Gnaq, which encode the orthologues of GNA11 and GNAQ (encoding Gαq), with increased serum parathyroid hormone concentrations due to parathyroid hyperplasia. This phenotype resembles neonatal severe primary hyperparathyroidism due to biallelic loss-of-function mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor.1,7 In addition, we hypothesized that Gα11 mutant proteins with gain of function may lead to hypocalcemia, just as mutations effecting gain of function in the calcium-sensing receptor result in autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1, which is associated with low or normal serum parathyroid hormone concentrations.4,8 In autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1, about 50% of patients have mild or asymptomatic hypocalcemia; about 50% have paresthesia, carpopedal spasm, and seizures; about 10% have hypercalciuria with nephrocalcinosis or kidney stones; and more than 35% have ectopic and basal ganglia calcifications (Table S2 in the Supplementary Appendix).8,9 We performed GNA11 mutational analysis in a kindred with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 210,11 and in unrelated patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia who did not have CASR or AP2S1 mutations.1,5 We also performed this analysis in patients with hypocalcemia who did not have CASR mutations.1 Our hypothesis was that we would detect Gα11 mutants with loss of function in patients with hypercalcemia and Gα11 mutants with gain of function in patients with hypocalcemia.
METHODS
PATIENTS
We identified members (10 affected and 8 unaffected) of four generations of a kindred with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 (referred to in other studies as Kindred 11675)10-12 and 9 unrelated patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia who did not have CASR or AP2S1 mutations of the coding region and exon–intron boundaries (Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix). We also identified 8 unrelated patients with hypocalcemia and low or normal serum parathyroid hormone concentrations — findings that were consistent with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1 — who did not have CASR mutations of the coding region and exon–intron boundaries (Table 1, and Table S2 in the Supplementary Appendix).1,5,9,14 Informed consent was obtained from all persons (verbal consent from 82 persons and written consent from 8 persons) with the use of protocols approved by local and national ethics committees.
Table 1.
Biochemical Findings in Patients with Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Type 2 and Patients with Autosomal Dominant Hypocalcemia Type 2 Who Had GNA11 Mutations.*
| Variable | Normal Range† | Patients with Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Type 2‡ | Patients with Autosomal Dominant Hypocalcemia Type 2‡ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1§ | Patient 2§ | Patient 3§ | Patient 4§ | ||
| Sex | Male | Female | Female | Female | |
| Family history of hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Age at presentation or diagnosis — yr¶ | 54 | 45 | 52 | 39 | |
| Serum measurements | |||||
| Calcium — mmol/liter∥ | 2.10–2.50 | 2.63 | 2.70 | 2.06 | 1.75 |
| Phosphate — mmol/liter | 0.70–1.40 | 0.78 | Within normal range | 1.09 | 1.54 |
| Alkaline phosphatase — U/liter | 30–130 or 70–330 (in Patient 2)** | 74 | 136 | 68 | 38 |
| Magnesium — mmol/liter | 0.70–1.05 | 0.80 | >Normal range | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| Creatinine — μmol/liter | 54–145 | 107 | 71 | 96 | 79 |
| Parathyroid hormone | 1.3–7.6 pmol/liter (in Patients 1 and 4), <5.0 pmol/liter (in Patient 2), and 10–65 ng/liter (in Patient 3)** | 5.0 | 2.7 | 50 | 1.3 |
| 25-Hydroxyvitamin D — nmol/liter | >50 | NA | 47.5 | 54.0 | 40.9 |
| Thyrotropin — mU/liter | 0.35–5.50 | 4.05 | NA | 0.84 | 1.19 |
| Urinary calcium:creatinine clearance | >0.02 | 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| GNA11 mutation‡ | Leu135Gln | Ile200del | Arg181Gln | Phe341Leu | |
NA denotes not available.
Normal ranges are from Pearce et al.13
In this study, mutational analysis identified GNA11 mutations (Fig. S1 and S8 in the Supplementary Appendix), and previous mutational analysis of CASR and AP2S1 in the patients with hypercalcemia and mutational analysis of CASR in patients with hypocalcemia did not identify any abnormalities of the coding regions or exon–intron boundaries.
Patient 1 was from Family 13/06 and Patient 2 was the proband from Family 1167510,11 in Table S1 and Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix. Patient 3 was from Family 03/01 and Patient 4 was from Family 02/03 in Table S2 and Fig. S8 in the Supplementary Appendix. Mean values of serum phosphate and magnesium measurements from affected persons in Family 11675 with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 were reported to be within the normal range or above the normal range.12
Patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and autosomal dominant hypocalcemia are frequently asymptomatic, and hence the age at presentation is the same as that at diagnosis; however, if the ages at presentation and diagnosis were not the same, then the age at diagnosis is provided.
Albumin-adjusted serum calcium values are shown.
Normal ranges for serum measurements varied according to the assays used and the age of the patients.
DNA SEQUENCE ANALYSIS
Leukocyte DNA was used with GNA11-specific primers (Table S3 in the Supplementary Appendix) for mutational analysis.1,13 Sequence changes were assessed for the occurrence of polymorphisms in 55 unrelated persons with normocalcemia and in the exome sequence data from approximately 5400 unrelated persons that were obtained from the Exome Sequencing Project of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI-ESP).15
PROTEIN SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF Gα11 STRUCTURE
Gα11 orthologues and paralogues were aligned with the Clustal W program.16 The crystal structures of Gαq,17,18 which shares 90% identity at the amino acid level with Gα11, were used to model Gα11 mutants with the use of the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (version 1.2r3pre, Schrödinger)5,17,19-21 (see the Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix).
FUNCTIONAL EXPRESSION OF GNA11 MUTATIONS
The full-length coding region of GNA11 was sub-cloned into the bidirectional vector pBI-CMV2 (Clontech), which expresses green fluorescent protein (GFP) and mutations introduced by site-directed mutagenesis.5 Nonmutant and mutant constructs were transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells that stably expressed calcium-sensing receptors.5 We measured the responses in intracellular calcium concentrations, detected with the use of indo-1 acetoxymethylester, to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations.1,5 Expression of the calcium-sensing receptor, Gα11, GFP, and Gαq was confirmed by means of Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence, or both (see the Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix).1,5
QUANTITATIVE REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE–POLYMERASE-CHAIN-REACTION ANALYSES
Quantitative reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction testing was performed with the use of RNA from parathyroid tumors and normal human tissues (see the Methods section in the Supplementary Appendix).22
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis for comparison of mutant with nonmutant results was performed with the use of the Mann–Whitney U test or the F-test.5
RESULTS
PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL HYPOCALCIURIC HYPERCALCEMIA
GNA11 Mutations
DNA sequence analysis of the GNA11 1077-bp coding region and 12 exon–intron boundaries in a proband from the kindred reported to have familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 210-12 identified a heterozygous 3-bp (ATC) deletion at c.598-600, leading to an in-frame deletion of the Ile200 residue (I200) (Fig. 1A, and Fig. S1A in the Supplementary Appendix). This deletion results in the gain of an XmnI restriction-endonuclease site, which was used to confirm the DNA sequence abnormality (Fig. 1B) and show cosegregation of the deletion with the disease in the 10 affected members from four generations of the kindred (Fig. 1C). GNA11 mutational analysis in 9 other patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (Table 1, and Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix) revealed, in 1 patient, a heterozygous T→A transversion at c.404 resulting in a Leu135Gln (L135Q) missense substitution, which altered a TspRI restriction-endonuclease site that was used to confirm the mutation (Fig. S1B and S1C in the Supplementary Appendix). In addition, the absence of these DNA sequence abnormalities in 55 unrelated persons with normocalcemia and in approximately 5400 exomes (from data obtained from the NHLBI-ESP),15 together with the conservation of I200 and Leu135 (L135) residues in vertebrate Gα11 subunit orthologues, human paralogues, or both (Fig. S2A in the Supplementary Appendix), indicated that the Ile200del (I200del) and L135Q abnormalities were probably GNA11 mutations rather than polymorphic variants.
Figure 1. GNA11 Mutation in a Patient with Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Type 2.
Panel A shows the predicted outcomes of DNA sequence analysis (Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix) in the proband of the kindred with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 (identified as Kindred 11675 in Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix), who had a heterozygous 3-bp (ATC) deletion, as compared with a normal unrelated person. The 3-bp deletion leads to an in-frame deletion of the Ile200 residue and gain of an XmnI restriction-endonuclease site (GAACA/TCTTC). Panel B shows the resulting XmnI restriction maps of nonmutant and mutant polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) products. Panel C shows the use of XmnI to confirm the mutation, which was not present in 110 alleles from 55 unrelated persons with normocalcemia (the findings in 3 of the 55 persons [N1, N2, and N3] are shown), and cosegregation of the Ile200del mutation with disease in the kindred with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 (LOD score, +3.60 at 0% recombination fraction). Each member of the kindred with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 is represented above the corresponding XmnI-digested PCR product and identified with the use of numbers previously reported10,11; a sample from Person II.6 was not available. All unaffected persons with normocalcemia were homozygous for nonmutant alleles, whereas affected persons were heterozygous for nonmutant and mutant alleles; these findings are consistent with an autosomal dominant inheritance of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2. Squares represent male family members, circles female family members, and black symbols affected family members. S denotes size marker. The proband is indicated by an arrow.
Predicted Effects of Gα11 Mutant Proteins
The I200 residue is located within a 13-amino-acid region (residues 193 through 205), the length of which is conserved among Gα11 orthologues and human paralogues (Fig. S2A in the Supplementary Appendix). It links two flexible regions known as switch 1 (αF–β2 loop) and switch 2 (β3–α2 loop and α2 helix) (Fig. 2A, and Fig. S2A and S2B in the Supplementary Appendix). Moreover, the I200 homologue is adjacent to the tetrapeptide β2–β3 loop that forms part of the interface between Gα and the G-protein–coupled receptor, and it is considered to have a role in G-protein–coupled receptor–mediated guanosine diphosphate (GDP) release and G-protein activation.17,18,21,23,24
Figure 2. Three-Dimensional Modeling and Functional Characterization of Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Type 2–Associated Mutant Gα11 Residues.
Panel A shows a three-dimensional model of the Gα11 helical and GTPase domains, which are the locations of the Leu135 (L135) and Ile200 (I200) residues (red), respectively. Gα11 has 90% identity to Gαq at the amino acid level, and the model is therefore based on the reported three-dimensional structure of Gαq (Fig. S2 in the Supplementary Appendix).17,18 I200 is located in the β3 sheet and adjacent to the β2–β3 loop, which is formed by the tetrapeptide comprising Ile(I)199-Asn(N)198-Glu(E)197-Leu(L)196. Panel B shows the β2–β3 loop region of nonmutant and mutant Gα11 and the structural effects of the I200del Gα11 mutant on hydrogen bonds (broken lines). Residues (red) mutagenized in this study (Fig. S3 and S7 in the Supplementary Appendix). Panels C and D show the responses of intracellular calcium concentrations to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations, in HEK293 cells stably expressing calcium-sensing receptors that were transiently transfected with nonmutant, familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2– associated mutant (I200del, Gln[Q]135), or empty GNA11–pBI-CMV2–green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression vectors (Fig. S3 in the Supplementary Appendix). The intracellular calcium responses to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations were expressed as a percentage of the maximum normalized response and are shown as the mean (±SE) of 8 to 45 assays from 3 to 12 independent transfections. P<0.001 for the comparisons of the mutant vector with the nonmutant and empty vectors. The familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated mutants (I200del and Q135) led to a rightward shift in the concentration–response curves, with significantly higher half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values (i.e., the extracellular calcium concentration required to produce a half-maximal increase in intracellular calcium concentration values) (Table S4 in the Supplementary Appendix), as compared with cells expressing nonmutated GNA11–pBI-CMV2-GFP. The familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated Leu135Gln mutation conferred on the mutant protein a significantly increased EC50 as compared with nonmutant Gα11 or empty vector alone, suggesting a possible dominant-negative effect.
An analysis of the predicted effects of the familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated I200del on the structure of the Gα11 β2–β3 sheet indicated that it would lead to a loss of five of the six hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2B), thereby disrupting the β2–β3 loop and affecting the switch-region conformational changes, which would limit the transition of the GDP-bound inactive form to the activated guanosine triphosphate (GTP)–bound form (Fig. S2B in the Supplementary Appendix). A similar analysis of the familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated L135Q mutation, located in the helical domain and close to the αD–αE loop that, together with the flexible switch-3 region, facilitates GDP release23 (Fig. 2A, and Fig. S2C in the Supplementary Appendix), also indicated a likely loss of Gα11 function.
Functional Characterization of Gα11 Mutants
Three-dimensional modeling predicted that the familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated mutations would probably result in loss of Gα11 function, and we hypothesized that these mutations would result in decreased sensitivity of cells expressing calcium-sensing receptors to extracellular calcium. To investigate this hypothesis, we used HEK293 cells that stably expressed calcium-sensing receptors, and we transiently transfected them with nonmutated or mutated GNA11–pBI-CMV2 expression constructs or with vector containing the GFP reporter gene alone (empty vector). We then assayed the responses of intracellular calcium concentrations to alterations in extracellular calcium concentrations. Expression of calcium-sensing receptor, Gα11, Gαq, and GFP was detected by means of immunofluorescence, Western blot analysis, or both (Fig. S3A, S3B, and S3C in the Supplementary Appendix). Expression of calcium-sensing receptor and Gαq, normalized by comparison with tubulin expression as a loading control, did not differ significantly between cells transfected with nonmutated or mutated GNA11–pBI-CMV2 vector and cells transfected with empty vector, whereas expression of Gα11 was significantly greater in the cells transfected with nonmutated or mutated GNA11–pBI-CMV2 vector. This finding is similar to that in human hyperplastic parathyroids, in which endogenous expression of Gα11 was more than 3 times as high as that of Gαq (Fig. S4 in the Supplementary Appendix).
The familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated I200del and Q135 Gα11 mutants resulted in a rightward shift in the concentration–response curves, with significantly higher half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values (Fig. 2C and 2D); this indicated a decrease in the sensitivity of cells expressing calcium-sensing receptors to alterations in extracellular calcium concentrations and was consistent with the effects of loss-of-function mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor that have been reported in familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 1.1,2 Moreover, cotransfection of each of the familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated mutated GNA11 constructs with a nonmutated construct, to maintain an approximate 1:1 stoichiometric balance, also resulted in rightward shifts in the concentration–response curves, with significantly higher EC50 values, which is consistent with a loss of function associated with I200del and Q135 Gα11 mutants (Fig. S5 and Table S4 in the Supplementary Appendix). Variations in Gα11 expression, which were approximately 1 to 6 times as high as that in untransfected cells, had no significant effects on the concentration–response curves or on the EC50 values (Fig. S6 in the Supplementary Appendix).
To further assess the role of the β2–β3 loop in Gα11 function, we generated β2–β3 mutant constructs with deletions, alanine substitutions, an insertion, and a substitution of Glu197-Asn198-Ile199 of Gα11 with the Gln197-Ser198-Val199 of Gαq (Fig. S7 and Table S4 in the Supplementary Appendix). Expression of these engineered β2–β3 loop mutants revealed that alanine substitution of Ile199, Ile200, Leu196, and Glu197, but not Asn198, resulted in significantly higher EC50 values, indicating the importance of these residues in forming hydrogen bonds and in maintaining the structural integrity of the β2–β3 loop (Fig. 2B). In support of these findings, substitution of the Gα11 Glu197-Asn198-Ile199 with the Gαq Gln197-Ser198-Val199, which permits hydrogen bonding between Val199 and Leu196, did not alter the calcium-sensing receptor EC50 value (Fig. S7 in the Supplementary Appendix). Finally, deletion of any one of the loop residues, or an insertion, resulted in a diminished response of the intracellular calcium concentration, whereas the Glu-Asn-Ile197-199Gln-Ser-Val substitution had no effect, findings that indicate the tetrapeptide length requirement of this loop for Gα11 activation. Thus, the familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated GNA11 mutants decreased signal transduction of the calcium-sensing receptor; these findings establish the importance of the Gα11 β2–β3 loop.
PATIENTS WITH HYPOCALCEMIA
GNA11 Mutations
GNA11 mutational analysis in 8 patients with hypocalcemia identified heterozygous sequence abnormalities comprising a G→A transition at c.542 and a C→G transversion at c.1023, which predicted the missense mutations Arg181Gln and Phe-341Leu, respectively, in 2 patients (Fig. 3 and Table 1, and Fig. S8 in the Supplementary Appendix). These DNA sequence abnormalities altered PstI and BstUI restriction-endonuclease sites, which were used to confirm the presence of the mutations (Fig. 3B and 3C, and Fig. S8 in the Supplementary Appendix). In addition, the absence of these DNA sequence abnormalities in 55 unrelated persons with normocalcemia and in about 5400 exomes (in data obtained from the NHLBI-ESP),15 together with conservation of Arg181 and Phe341 residues in vertebrate Gα11 subunit orthologues and human paralogues (Fig. S9A in the Supplementary Appendix), indicated that the Arg181Gln and Phe341Leu abnormalities were probably GNA11 mutations rather than polymorphic variants. Patients with GNA11 mutations were therefore designated as having auto-somal dominant hypocalcemia type 2.
Figure 3. GNA11 Mutation in a Patient with Autosomal Dominant Hypocalcemia.
Panel A shows the predicted outcomes of DNA sequence analysis (Fig. S8 in the Supplementary Appendix) in Patient 3, who is the proband of a family with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 (Table S2 in the Supplementary Appendix) who had a heterozygous G→A transition at c.542, as compared with a normal unrelated person. The effect of the G→A transition is an alteration at codon 181 from CGG (encoding the nonmutant Arg [R] residue) to CAG (encoding a mutant Gln [Q] residue) and gain of a PstI restriction-endonuclease site (CTGCA/G). Panel B shows the resulting PstI restriction maps of nonmutant and mutant PCR products. Panel C shows the use of PstI to confirm the mutation, which was not present in 110 alleles from 55 unrelated persons with normocalcemia (the results in 1 of the 55 persons [normal control 1, or N1] are shown). Each person is rep resented above the corresponding restriction enzyme–digested PCR products. The unaffected persons with normocalcemia are homozygous for the nonmutant alleles, whereas the affected proband is heterozygous for the nonmutant and mutant alleles; this finding is consistent with an autosomal dominant inheritance of autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2. S denotes the size marker.
Predicted Effects of Gα11 Mutant Proteins
The mutant Arg181 is located in the αF helix of the helical domain, close to the Arg183 residue in the adjacent linker-2 region (Fig. 4A and 4B), which is important for GTP hydrolysis.26 The auto-somal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–associated Arg181Gln mutation is predicted to shift the position of Arg183 and disrupt hydrogen bonds between Arg183 and GDP (Fig. 4B, and Fig. S9 in the Supplementary Appendix). The autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–mutated Phe341, located in the GTPase domain, is predicted to disrupt a hydrophobic cluster that also comprises Phe194 and Phe201 in the GTPase domain (Fig. 4A and 4B, and Fig. S9 in the Supplementary Appendix). Both the Arg181Gln mutation and the Phe341Leu mutation probably decrease the stabilization of the GTP hydrolysis transition state by Arg183 and Gln209,26-30 thereby prolonging the lifetime of the active GTP-bound Gα11 subunit. We therefore hypothesized that these effects of the autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 Gα11 mutant proteins would result in an increased sensitivity of calcium-sensing receptor–expressing cells to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations.
Figure 4. Location of Autosomal Dominant Hypocalcemia Type 2–Associated Gα11 Mutants in a Three-Dimensional Model and Effects on the EC50 of Calcium-Sensing Receptor–Expressing Cells.
Panel A shows a three-dimensional model of the helical and GTPase domains of Gα11. The Arg181 (R181) and Phe341 (F341) residues (red) are located in the helical and GTPase domains, respectively. Panel B shows a three-dimensional model of the guanosine diphosphate (GDP) (blue)–aluminum fluoride (AlF4) (gray) binding pocket. Shown are the locations of R181 (red); the hydrophobic phenylalanine (F) cluster in which F341 (red), located in the α5 helix, interacts with F194 (magenta) and F201 (magenta), which are on the β2 and β3 sheets, respectively (Fig. S9 in the Supplementary Appendix); and R183 (black) and Q209 (orange), which are involved in somatic activating mutations in uveal melanomas.25 R181 and R183 form hydrogen bonds with GDP-AlF4, thereby stabilizing the GTP hydrolysis transition state. Panels C and D show responses of intracellular calcium concentrations to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations, in HEK293 cells stably expressing calcium-sensing receptors that were transiently transfected with nonmutant, autosomal dominant hypocalcemia–associated mutant (Q181 or L341), or empty GNA11–pBI-CMV2-GFP expression vectors (Fig. S10 in the Supplementary Appendix). The intracellular calcium responses to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations were expressed as a percentage of the maximum normalized response and are shown as the mean (±SE) value of 8 to 45 assays from 3 to 12 independent transfections. P<0.001 for the comparisons of the mutant vectors with the nonmutant and empty vectors. The autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–associated mutants (Q181 and L341) led to a leftward shift in the concentration–response curve, with significantly lower EC50 values (Table S4 in the Supplementary Appendix).
Functional Characterization of Gα11 Mutants
Nonmutated or mutated GNA11–pBI-CMV2 constructs or empty vector were expressed in HEK293 cells stably expressing calcium-sensing receptors, and the responses of intracellular calcium concentrations to alterations in extracellular calcium concentrations were assessed. Expression of calcium-sensing receptor, Gα11, Gαq, and GFP was detected by means of immunofluorescence, Western blot analysis, or both, and expressions of calcium-sensing receptor and Gαq, when normalized for tubulin, were found to be similar, whereas those of Gα11 were significantly increased, as compared with transfection with empty vector (Fig. S10 in the Supplementary Appendix). The autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–associated Gα11 mutants, Gln181 and Leu341, resulted in a leftward shift in the concentration–response curves, with significantly lower EC50 values, as compared with nonmutant Gα11 (Fig. 4C and 4D). Thus, the decreases in the EC50 values of the calcium-sensing receptor that are induced by the autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–associated mutants indicate an enhanced sensitivity of cells expressing calcium-sensing receptors to changes in extracellular calcium concentrations; this finding is consistent with the effects of gain-of-function mutations of the calcium-sensing receptor reported in autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1.
DISCUSSION
Our study shows that familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 is due to mutations that diminish the function of Gα11, and autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 is due to mutations effecting gain of function of Gα11. The mutations we describe here appear to be unique human germline disease-causing GNA11 mutations. Moreover, these germline GNA11 mutations were detected in more than 10% of patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia who did not have CASR and AP2S1 mutations and in approximately 25% of patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia who did not have CASR mutations. Our study also shows a novel form of autosomal dominant hypocalcemia designated as autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2. The patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 and germline GNA11 mutations had clinical features that were similar to those of patients with hypocalcemia who did not have GNA11 mutations. Moreover, the two patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 were similar to the patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1 in that they had hypocalcemia, which may be asymptomatic or may be associated with neuromuscular irritability.4 In addition, the patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 did not have hypercalciuria, which is observed in only 10% of patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 1.8,9 However, extrapolation from this small number of patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 requires caution, since data are lacking from detailed studies involving larger numbers of patients. Such studies might help to clarify the effects of mutant Gα11 on renal calcium excretion.
Somatic GNA11 gain-of-function mutations involving the Arg183 and Gln209 residues have been described in patients with uveal melanomas.25,31 However, these patients were not reported to have hypocalcemia,31 and the two patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 who had Gα11 mutants with gain of function did not have ophthalmologic abnormalities. Such differences in disease manifestations associated with somatic and germline mutations are also observed in other disorders. For example, germline mutations of the α-thalassemia and mental retardation, X-linked (ATRX) gene cause the ATR-X syndrome,32 whereas somatic ATRX mutations are detected in about 40% of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors33; germline KRAS mutations are detected in approximately 5% of patients with the Noonan syndrome, whereas somatic KRAS mutations are commonly detected in human cancers.34
In addition, there may be species-specific differences, since an N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea–induced germline hypermorphic Gna11 mutation (Ile63Val), which has been described in a mouse model of dark skin (Dsk7), has not been reported to have uveal or extracellular calcium abnormalities,35 and Gα11-null mice are reported to be normocalcemic.7 However, Gα11-null mice with parathyroid-specific deletion of both Gnaq alleles are hypercalcemic; this indicates functional redundancy between Gα11 and Gαq in mouse parathyroids.7,36 Such functional redundancy is unlikely in human parathyroids, since mutation of one GNA11 allele resulted in familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2, and it seems possible that these species-specific differences may stem from altered levels of Gα11 and Gαq expression in tissues. It is noteworthy that in human parathyroids, Gα11 expression is higher than that of Gαq; these findings are consistent with observations in bovine parathyroids.37
Our analysis of structure and function highlighted critical G-protein motifs. G proteins are heterotrimeric complexes that relay signals from G-protein–coupled receptors. Activation of the G-protein–coupled receptor stimulates an exchange of Gα-bound GDP for GTP, causing dissociation of Gα from Gβγ and facilitating interactions with downstream effectors.23,38 Our results indicate that familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2–associated mutations probably impair GDP release,23,24 whereas autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–associated mutations prolong the activated Gα-GTP state. These results are consistent with the findings from studies of transducin (Gαt ) and K-ras GTPase mutant proteins.27,34 Thus, structural analysis of Gαt has shown that the β2–β3 loop forms part of the interface between Gα and the G-protein–coupled receptor and may facilitate G-protein– coupled receptor–mediated GDP release.24 In addition, mutations effecting Gαt and K-ras residues that are homologous with the autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2–mutated Gα11 Phe341 have been reported to disrupt the hydrophobic phenylalanine cluster and increase the rate of GDP–GTP exchange, thereby promoting the active GTP-bound form.27,34 Thus, our studies of disease-causing Gα11 mutants with loss of function and gain of function provide support for the role of the β2–β3 loop and phenylalanine cluster in GDP–GTP exchange and activation of the Gα subunit.
In conclusion, our identification of human germline GNA11 mutations associated with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 2 and autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type 2 shows the pivotal role of Gα11 in calcium-sensing receptor–mediated signal transduction and extra-cellular calcium homeostasis in humans.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Supported by grants from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (G9825289 and G1000467, to Drs. Nesbit, Hannan, and Thakker), the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Programme (to Drs. Nesbit and Thakker), the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-264663, to Ms. Babinsky), and the National Institutes of Health (DK-38855 and DK-44292, to Dr. Heath). Dr. Howles is a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Training Fellow.
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
References
- 1.Hannan FM, Nesbit MA, Zhang C, et al. Identification of 70 calcium-sensing receptor mutations in hyper- and hypocalcaemic patients: evidence for clustering of extracellular domain mutations at calcium-binding sites. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:2768–78. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pollak MR, Brown EM, Chou YH, et al. Mutations in the human Ca(2+)-sensing receptor gene cause familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and neonatal severe hyperparathyroidism. Cell. 1993;75:1297–303. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90617-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Christensen SE, Nissen PH, Vestergaard P, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and parathyroid hormone in familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and primary hyperpara thyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;159:719–27. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thakker RV. Diseases associated with the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor. Cell Calcium. 2004;35:275–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2003.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nesbit MA, Hannan FM, Howles SA, et al. Mutations in AP2S1 cause familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 3. Nat Genet. 2013;45:93–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.2492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hofer AM, Brown EM. Extracellular calcium sensing and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:530–8. doi: 10.1038/nrm1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wettschureck N, Lee E, Libutti SK, Offermanns S, Robey PG, Spiegel AM. Parathyroid-specific double knockout of Gq and G11 alpha-subunits leads to a phenotype resembling germline knockout of the extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:274–80. doi: 10.1210/me.2006-0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yamamoto M, Akatsu T, Nagase T, Ogata E. Comparison of hypocalcemic hypercalciuria between patients with idiopathic hypoparathyroidism and those with gain-of-function mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor: is it possible to differentiate the two disorders? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4583–91. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.12.7035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pearce SH, Williamson C, Kifor O, et al. A familial syndrome of hypocalcemia with hypercalciuria due to mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1115–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610103351505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Heath H III, Leppert MF, Lifton RP, Penniston JT. Genetic linkage analysis in familial benign hypercalcemia using a candidate gene strategy. I. Studies in four families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75:846–51. doi: 10.1210/jcem.75.3.1517376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heath H III, Jackson CE, Otterud B, Leppert MF. Genetic linkage analysis in familial benign (hypocalciuric) hypercalcemia: evidence for locus heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet. 1993;53:193–200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Law WM, Jr, Heath H III. Familial benign hypercalcemia (hypocalciuric hyper-calcemia): clinical and pathogenetic studies in 21 families. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:511–9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pearce SH, Trump D, Wooding C, et al. Calcium-sensing receptor mutations in familial benign hypercalcemia and neonatal hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2683–92. doi: 10.1172/JCI118335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raue F, Pichl J, Dorr HG, et al. Activating mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor: genetic and clinical spectrum in 25 patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcaemia — a German survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011;75:760–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Exome variant server. NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP); Seattle: ( http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS) [Google Scholar]
- 16.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nishimura A, Kitano K, Takasaki J, et al. Structural basis for the specific inhibition of heterotrimeric Gq protein by a small molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:13666–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003553107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Waldo GL, Ricks TK, Hicks SN, et al. Kinetic scaffolding mediated by a phospholipase C-beta and Gq signaling complex. Science. 2010;330:974–80. doi: 10.1126/science.1193438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.MacPyMOL: a PyMOL-based molecular graphics application for MacOS X. DeLano Scientific; Palo Alto, CA: 2007. ( http://www.pymol.org) [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bramucci E, Paiardini A, Bossa F, Pascarella S. PyMod: sequence similarity searches, multiple sequence-structure alignments, and homology modeling within PyMOL. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13(Suppl 4):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S4-S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tesmer VM, Kawano T, Shankaranarayanan A, Kozasa T, Tesmer JJ. Snapshot of activated G proteins at the membrane: the Galphaq-GRK2-Gbetagamma complex. Science. 2005;310:1686–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1118890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reed AA, Loh NY, Terryn S, et al. CLC-5 and KIF3B interact to facilitate CLC-5 plasma membrane expression, endocytosis, and microtubular transport: relevance to pathophysiology of Dent's disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;298:F365–F380. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00038.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Oldham WM, Hamm HE. Heterotrimeric G protein activation by G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:60–71. doi: 10.1038/nrm2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thomas TO, Bae H, Medkova M, Hamm HE. An intramolecular contact in Galpha transducin that participates in maintaining its intrinsic GDP release rate. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun. 2001;4:282–91. doi: 10.1006/mcbr.2001.0293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Van Raamsdonk CD, Bezrookove V, Green G, et al. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi. Nature. 2009;457:599–602. doi: 10.1038/nature07586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bourne HR. G proteins: the arginine finger strikes again. Nature. 1997;389:673–4. doi: 10.1038/39470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marin EP, Krishna AG, Sakmar TP. Rapid activation of transducin by muta tions distant from the nucleotide-binding site: evidence for a mechanistic model of receptor-catalyzed nucleotide exchange by G proteins. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:27400–5. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100198200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kimple AJ, Bosch DE, Giguere PM, Siderovski DP. Regulators of G-protein signaling and their Galpha substrates: promises and challenges in their use as drug discovery targets. Pharmacol Rev. 2011;63:728–49. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.003038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Graziano MP, Gilman AG. Synthesis in Escherichia coli of GTPase-deficient mutants of Gs alpha. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:15475–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Valencia A, Chardin P, Wittinghofer A, Sander C. The Ras protein family: evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids. Biochemistry. 1991;30:4637–48. doi: 10.1021/bi00233a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Van Raamsdonk CD, Griewank KG, Crosby MB, et al. Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2191–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gibbons RJ, Wada T, Fisher CA, et al. Mutations in the chromatin-associated protein ATRX. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:796–802. doi: 10.1002/humu.20734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jiao Y, Shi C, Edil BH, et al. DAXX/ ATRX, MEN1, and mTOR pathway genes are frequently altered in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Science. 2011;331:1199–203. doi: 10.1126/science.1200609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schubbert S, Bollag G, Lyubynska N, et al. Biochemical and functional characterization of germ line KRAS mutations. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:7765–70. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00965-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Van Raamsdonk CD, Fitch KR, Fuchs H, de Angelis MH, Barsh GS. Effects of G-protein mutations on skin color. Nat Genet. 2004;36:961–8. doi: 10.1038/ng1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wettschureck N, Offermanns S. Mammalian G proteins and their cell type specific functions. Physiol Rev. 2005;85:1159–204. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00003.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Varrault A, Pena MS, Goldsmith PK, Mithal A, Brown EM, Spiegel AM. Expression of G protein alpha-subunits in bovine parathyroid. Endocrinology. 1995;136:4390–6. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.10.7664659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Spiegel AM, Weinstein LS. Inherited diseases involving G proteins and G protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Med. 2004;55:27–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




