Significance
We show the histone mark H3K9me2, which is known to mediate transposon silencing, to determine the choice between alternative polyadenylation sites within the Arabidopsis thaliana disease resistance gene RPP7. High H3K9me2 levels recruited to the first RPP7 intron by the COPIA-R7 retrotransposon suppress use of a promoter-proximal polyadenylation site. Modulating H3K9me2 levels at this site shifts the balance between full-length and incomplete RPP7 transcripts. By recruiting H3K9me2-dependent polyadenylation control to RPP7, the COPIA-R7 insertion provided a new switch to fine-tune RPP7 expression. Selective advantages resulting from this mechanism likely contributed to the domestication of COPIA-R7 at RPP7.
Keywords: post translational histone modification, EDM2, Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, PHD finger
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) can drive evolution by creating genetic and epigenetic variation. Although examples of adaptive TE insertions are accumulating, proof that epigenetic information carried by such “domesticated” TEs has been coopted to control host gene function is still limited. We show that COPIA-R7, a TE inserted into the Arabidopsis thaliana disease resistance gene RPP7 recruited the histone mark H3K9me2 to this locus. H3K9me2 levels at COPIA-R7 affect the choice between two alternative RPP7 polyadenylation sites in the pre-mRNA and, thereby, influence the critical balance between RPP7-coding and non–RPP7-coding transcript isoforms. Function of RPP7 is fully dependent on high levels of H3K9me2 at COPIA-R7. We present a direct in vivo demonstration for cooption of a TE-associated histone mark to the epigenetic control of pre-mRNA processing and establish a unique mechanism for regulation of plant immune surveillance gene expression. Our results functionally link a histone mark to alternative polyadenylation and the balance between distinct transcript isoforms from a single gene.
As transposition of transposable elements (TEs) can cause detrimental mutations, TE expression must be tightly suppressed by host silencing mechanisms. In plants, besides methylation of the DNA base cytosine, the posttranslational histone modifications (PHMs) H3K9me2 (dimethylated lysine 9 of histone H3) and H3K27me1 (monomethylated lysine 27 of H3) are closely associated with transcriptional silencing of TEs (1). In Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis), H3K9me2 is mainly catalyzed by the partially functionally redundant Su(var)3–9 family histone methyltransferases SUVH4/KRYPTONITE, SUVH5, and SUVH6 (2-5). ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX-RELATED PROTEIN 5 and 6 (ATXR5 and ATXR6) have overlapping roles in mediating H3K27me1 (6).
Despite their detrimental potenial, TEs can also be beneficial for adaptive evolution of host genome structure and expression control (7–10). For example, TEs have been shown to influence expression of nearby genes by altering local epigenetic states or providing cis-regulatory promoter elements. In eukaryotes, the expression of protein-encoding genes is typically regulated at multiple levels including RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-mediated transcription, pre-mRNA processing, translation, and transcript or protein turnover (11). Alternative polyadenylation (APA) has recently emerged as an important contributor to global gene regulation (12). Differential choice of APA sites (APAS) can affect the protein-coding potential of a given mRNA and/or its stability, localization, or translation efficiency (13).
APA has been thought to be predominantly regulated by polyadenylation factors binding to cis elements within pre-mRNAs (14). However, such interactions seem not sufficient to explain all APA-related events observed in vivo. Importantly, RNA processing factors are recruited to pre-mRNA cotranscriptionally when the nascent transcript is still being synthesized at the template genomic DNA (15–17). The physical proximity of the DNA template and transcript-processing events provides opportunities for molecular interactions between chromatin and the pre-mRNA processing machinery. Indeed, recent observations suggested that pre-mRNA processing including polyadenylation and splicing is regulated also at the chromatin level (13, 18, 19). Intriguingly, polyadenylation sites were shown to be depleted of nucleosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (20). In addition, differential distribution of PHMs along genes possibly marking distinct architectural features of their sequence has been reported in humans (21).
Plant disease resistance genes encode NLR (nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing)-type immune receptors that trigger defense reactions upon molecular recognition of pathogen-derived molecules (22). We previously reported on the Arabidopsis gene EDM2 (enhanced downy mildew 2), which has a promoting effect on transcript levels of the NLR gene resistance to Peronospora parasitica (RPP7) (23). Although we also showed EDM2 to contribute to transcriptional TE silencing by modulating levels of the repressive PHM H3K9me2 (24), it has been unclear how EDM2 affects RPP7. Here, we show that EDM2 affects levels of RPP7-coding transcripts by modulating APA. We further demonstrate that this APA mechanism results from cooption of epigenetic information at a TE insertion locus. Besides mechanistic insight on chromatin-level control of APA, we provide an example for biologically relevant effects of TE insertions on gene function.
Results
EDM2 Controls COPIA-R7–Associated H3K9me2 and Co- or Posttranscriptionally Affects RPP7-Coding Transcript Levels.
NLR expression and activity is known to be tightly controlled, as certain minimal receptor activity levels are required for efficient pathogen recognition whereas NLR activity levels above a certain threshold can trigger autoimmunity and spontaneous cell death (25–29). We found levels of RPP7-coding transcripts to be well-correlated with levels of immunity conferred by this disease resistance gene, indicating that proper control of these transcripts is critical for RPP7 function (30) (Fig. S1).
RPP7 (AT1G58602) in the Arabidopsis Col-0 accession is a complex gene with three noncoding exons upstream from its start codon, followed by three coding exons and three noncoding exons (Fig. 1A). The first RPP7 intron contains a Ty-1 COPIA-type retrotransposon in sense orientation that we termed COPIA-R7 (Fig. 1A). COPIA-R7 has long terminal repeats (LTRs) at both ends.
By RT-PCR, we previously found levels of RPP7-coding transcripts to be strongly reduced in edm2 mutants compared with their parental wild-type background Col-0 (23). We confirmed the reduction of spliced RPP7-coding transcript levels in three independent edm2 mutants by real-time quantitative (q) RT-PCR (primer combination c in Fig. 1B). By chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled with qPCR, we found H3K9me2 levels in COPIA-R7 to be high in Col-0 and strongly reduced in edm2 mutants (Fig. 1C). Levels of this histone mark were low and not influenced by EDM2 in regions of RPP7 remote from the TE. Levels of other well-characterized PHMs, such as H3K4me3, H3K27me1, and H3K27me3 are not or only slightly affected at RPP7/COPIA-R7 in edm2 mutants (Fig. S2). Despite the reduction of H3K9me2 levels at COPIA-R7, qRT-PCR analysis showed transcript levels of this TE not to be altered in edm2 plants (Fig. 1D).
To understand whether reduced RPP7-coding transcript levels in edm2 mutants can be accounted for by a change of the rate of transcription, we measured unspliced pre-mRNA transcripts in a population of total RNA by qRT-PCR (primer combination a in Fig. 1 A and E). This PCR technique of nascent RNA determination was successfully used previously (31). Unlike mature RPP7-coding mRNA, levels of nascent (unspliced) RPP7 transcripts are not reduced in edm2 mutants. Consistently, RNAPII occupancy at RPP7 regions surrounding the transcription start site, as determined by ChIP-qPCR, was also not significantly altered in edm2 mutants (Fig. 1F). These data demonstrate that EDM2 promotes high H3K9me2 levels at COPIA-R7 and positively affects levels of RPP7-coding transcripts in a co- or posttranscriptional manner.
EDM2 Affects the Ratio Between Two Distinct RPP7 RNA Transcript Isoforms.
We separately measured by qRT-PCR levels of transcripts containing each RPP7 exon (exon1–exon4; Fig. 2A, Upper). Levels of transcripts containing exon1 of RPP7 did not differ between Col-0 and edm2 plants whereas levels of transcripts containing the later RPP7 exons are clearly reduced in these mutants (Fig. 2B). This effect was reverted to the wild-type Col-0 level in a transgenic complementation line expressing N-terminally HA-tagged EDM2 driven by the native EDM2 promoter in the edm2-2 background (E2pro:HA-E2c). This line also exhibited fully restored RPP7-mediated immunity and wild-type levels of RPP7-coding transcripts (Fig. S1). These observations strongly suggested that an EDM2-dependent regulatory mechanism targets intron1 of RPP7.
We further analyzed RPP7 transcripts by 3′RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) with RNA from Col-0 and edm2-2 plants (Fig. 2A, primers i and ii). Similar band patterns were observed between 3′RACE runs with Col-0 and edm2-2 RNA using primers ii, after agarose gel electrophoresis. However, band patterns obtained with primer i clearly differed between Col-0 and edm2-2 (Fig. 2C). By sequencing a differential 3′RACE product generated from edm2-2 RNA with primer i (indicated by an arrow in Fig. 2C), we identified one spliced RPP7 transcript species that is initiated at the primer annealing site in exon1, extends until a regular splice donor site at the end of the exon1, and continues from an alternative splice acceptor site (ASAS) within intron1 until it is terminated in the 5′-LTR of COPIA-R7 (Fig. 2A, Lower). We termed this shorter non–RPP7-coding transcript ECL (exon 1-containing LTR-terminated transcript). Sequencing the 3′RACE product for Col-0 with primer ii (Fig. 2C, highlighted by an arrow) revealed the polyadenylation site of COPIA-R7 transcripts to be located in the 3′-LTR of this TE. The 5′-LTRs of retrotransposons often act as promoters whereas 3′-LTRs function as terminators although their nucleotide sequences of 5′- and 3′-LTRs are near-identical (32) (Fig. S3). The region harboring the polyadenylation site for ECL in the 5′-LTR is identical to that for COPIA-R7 in the 3′-LTR (Fig. 2D).
By 5′RACE, we found a cluster of common transcription start sites (TSSs) for ECL and RPP7-coding transcripts spreading over a very short genomic stretch (Fig. S4) surrounding the predicted RPP7 TSS (www.arabidopsis.org/). Thus, both types of transcripts must be controlled by the same promoter. ECL is unlikely to encode any functional protein as the polypeptide potentially encoded by the longest ECL ORF consists of only 129 amino acids, does not start from an ATG codon, and does not have obvious homology (E > 1.8) to any protein from Arabidopsis or other organisms in protein databases (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Taken together, these data revealed the presence of alternative polyadenylation (APAS) and splice acceptor sites (ASAS) in intron1 of RPP7.
By qRT-PCR, we found the fraction of ECL transcripts within the pool of exon1-containing transcripts to be substantially higher in edm2-2 plants compared with Col-0 (Fig. 2 A and E). The balance between these two transcript types was reverted to that observed in Col-0 in the E2pro:HA-EDM2c line (Fig. 2E). Together with the fact that the rate of de novo RPP7 transcript synthesis is not affected by EDM2 mutations, this observation shows the APAS to be more strongly used in edm2 mutants compared with Col-0. In edm2 plants, preferential use of this promoter-proximal APAS results in enhanced levels of non–RPP7-coding ECL transcripts among all exon1-containing transcripts and, consequently, reduced levels of RPP7-coding transcripts.
EDM2 Physically Associates with EDM2-Dependent H3K9me2-Marked Areas at ECL/COPIA-R7.
A high-resolution analysis of H3K9me2 levels at RPP7 by ChIP-qPCR showed high levels of this mark to be present from exon2 of ECL until exon2 of RPP7 including the body of COPIA-R7 (Fig. 3 A and B, regions 4–10). RPP7 regions upstream from the splice acceptor site of ECL exon2 exhibit only low levels of H3K9me2 (Fig. 3B, regions 1–3). Intriguingly, the extent of H3K9me2 in ECL exon2 and COPIA-R7 is clearly dependent on EDM2. In this region, levels of this PHM are substantially lower in edm2 plants compared with Col-0 whereas near wild-type levels are restored in the E2pro:HA-EDM2c line.
By ChIP-qPCR with the E2pro:HA-EDM2c line and a commercially available anti-HA antibody, we observed clear HA-EDM2 enrichment at regions 5–10 (Fig. 3C), indicating that EDM2 is physically recruited to an area, stretching from ECL exon2 into COPIA-R7, that carries EDM2-dependent H3K9me2 marks.
A Triple Mutant of H3K9 Methyltransferases Phenocopies edm2 Mutants.
EDM2 affects H3K9me2 levels at ECL/COPIA-R7 and balances the ratio between ECL and RPP7-coding transcripts. If the effect of EDM2 on H3K9me2 is causal for the ECL/RPP7 coding transcript balance, the suvh456 triple mutant, which is deficient in all three major Arabidopsis H3K9 methyltransferases, should phenocopy all RPP7-related phenotypes of edm2 mutants. As expected, the suvh456 mutant exhibited strongly reduced H3K9me2 levels in exon2 of ECL and COPIA-R7 compared with Col-0 (Fig. 4A). We also observed in this triple mutant reduced levels of RPP7-coding transcripts (Fig. 4B), enhanced ECL transcript levels (Fig. 4C), and complete loss of RPP7-dependent Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis resistance (Fig. 4E). As seen in edm2 mutants, reduction of H3K9me2 levels in suvh456 did not affect the rate of RPP7 transcription (Fig. 4D). Thus, reduced H3K9me2 levels are indeed causal for the altered balance between ECL and RPP7-coding transcripts and the loss-of-immunity phenotype of edm2 mutants.
Insertion of COPIA-R7 Coopted the H3K9me2-Dependent Regulatory Mechanism to RPP7 Expression Control.
Inspection of the genomes of 80 wild inbred Arabidopsis accessions (http://1001genomes.org/index.html) (33) indicated that most natural variants of this species contain COPIA-R7 in RPP7. However, six Arabidopsis accessions—Krazo-2, Koch-1, Cdm-1, Istisu-1, ICE75, and ICE134—appeared to lack this TE in intron1 of RPP7. Sequencing of cloned genomic sequences from Krazo-2 and Koch-1 confirmed the lack of COPIA-R7 in the respective regions. Based on cDNAs we cloned from Krazo-2 and Koch-1, the exon/intron structures of their RPP7-like genes and Col-0 RPP7 are clearly conserved. However, COPIA-R7 and fragments of other transposon in intron2 (Fig. S5) are lacking in the RPP7-like genes from Krazo-2 and Koch-1 (Fig. 5A). Because of their high similarity to Col-0 RPP7 both at the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence levels, we concluded that these genes are orthologs of Col-0 RPP7 and were therefore named RPP7Krazo-2 or RPP7Koch-1, respectively (Fig. 5A). Detailed sequence analyses of RPP7Krazo-2 or RPP7Koch-1 are described in SI Text.
Intriguingly, we found insertional sequence blocks at the position corresponding to the stretch immediately downstream to Col-0 COPIA-R7 in both RPP7Krazo-2 and RPP7Koch-1. This sequence is neither related to transposons nor homologous to any Col-0 genomic sequences. We term it NIC (not in Col-0) (Fig. 5A). Surprisingly, by 3′RACE (Fig. S6), we found ECL-like transcripts also to be generated at RPP7Krazo-2 and RPP7Koch-1. Sequencing of the 3′RACE products revealed that the ASAS for ECL-like transcripts in RPP7Krazo-2 and RPP7Koch-1 are conserved compared with that in Col-0 RPP7 (Fig. 5B) whereas their APAS are located in the middle of the NIC sequences (Fig. 5B).
We cloned cDNAs from Krazo-2 and Koch-1, which are orthologous to that of EDM2 in Col-0. At the nucleotide level, they are 99.4% and 100% identical to the Col-0 EDM2 cDNA, respectively. Their deduced amino acid sequences are also 99.4% and 100% identical to that of Col-0 EDM2. Col-0, Krazo-2, and Koch-1 plants expressing a common EDM2 mRNA silencing trigger exhibited strongly reduced levels of EDM2-like transcripts (Fig. 5C). These lines showed morphological changes of leaves also seen in edm2 mutants (34). Therefore, the cloned Krazo-2 and Koch-1 cDNAs clearly encode EDM2 orthologs. Therefore, we termed the respective genes EDM2Krazo-2 and EDM2Koch-1.
Silencing of EDM2Krazo-2 and EDM2Koch-1 did not affect levels of RPP7-coding transcripts whereas silencing of EDM2 in Col-0 clearly reduced levels of these transcripts (Fig. 5D). In addition, silencing of EDM2Krazo-2 and EDM2Koch-1 also did not affect levels of ECLKrazo-2 and ECLKoch-1 (Fig. 5E). Therefore, EDM2 does not control RPP7 expression in these accessions.
We also measured levels of H3K9me2 at ECLKrazo-2, ECLKoch-1, and Col-0 ECL, respectively (Fig. 5F). Consistent with the data in Fig. 3B, high levels of H3K9me2 were detected in exon2 of ECL in Col-0 (regions 2–3 in Fig. 5B). This PHM is depleted at the corresponding ECL regions of Krazo-2 and Koch-1 (regions ii and iii in Fig. 5B). Thus, high levels of H3K9me2 at ECL in Col-0 must have originated from the COPIA-R7 insertion and EDM2 affects RPP7 expression through COPIA-R7 in Col-0.
H3K9me2-Dependent APA Fine-Tunes RPP7-Coding Transcript Levels in Response to HpaHiks1.
We previously reported a transient up-regulation of RPP7-coding transcripts following HpaHiks1 recognition in Col-0 (23). By qRT-PCR analysis in Col-0, we now found this HpaHiks1-induced transient increase of RPP7-coding transcript levels to be accompanied by up-regulation of all exon1-containing transcripts including those of ECL (Fig. 6A). Most importantly, measuring relative levels of RPP7-coding transcript levels compared with those of ECL (R7/ECL), we found the R7/ECL ratio to decline after HpaHiks recognition (Fig. 6B). This trend was tightly correlated with a similar HpaHiks1-induced decline of H3K9me2 at the APAS for ECL (Fig. 6C). Such pathogen recognition-induced changes of the R7/ECL ratio, H3K9me2 levels at the APAS for ECL, or RPP7-coding transcript levels were not observed in edm2-2 (Fig. 6 B and C) (23). Multiple mechanisms are likely to adjust levels of RPP7 coding transcripts after HpaHiks1 infection. However, based on our observations, dynamic changes of the R7/ECL balance caused by modulation of H3K9me2 at the APAS for ECL clearly contribute to the fine-tuning of RPP7 coding transcript levels.
Discussion
Here, we report a unique mechanism controlling expression of the Arabidopsis disease resistance gene RPP7 that involves H3K9me2-mediated APA and determines the balance between two distinct RPP7-derived transcript isoforms (Fig. 7). This mechanism is a consequence of the insertion of the retrotransposon COPIA-R7 in intron1 of RPP7 and is critical for the biological function of RPP7. The plant homeodomain (PHD)-finger protein EDM2 that we previously showed to control H3K9me2 and silencing states of the Arabidopsis TEs Mu1 and COPIA4 (24) also affects this histone mark at COPIA-R7 and has been coopted along with COPIA-R7 to the control of RPP7 expression.
COPIA-R7 has two key roles in this unique mechanism. Firstly, the 5′-LTR of this TE provides an APAS. Secondly, this retrotransposon carries epigenetic information that controls use of this APAS. Lower levels of H3K9me2 at the COPIA-R7 region in edm2 mutant plants correlate with increased use of this promoter-proximal APAS in the 5′-LTR of COPIA-R7, resulting in enhanced levels of ECL transcript and reduced levels of RPP7-coding transcript.
The physical association of EDM2 with the genomic region of ECL exon2 as well as COPIA-R7, where high levels of EDM2-dependent H3K9me2 are observed, indicates direct participation of this protein in this gene regulatory mechanism. It is well-established in Arabidopsis that the repressive PHM H3K9me2 predominantly associates with TEs and contributes to heterochromatic silencing (1). Furthermore, H3K9me2 appears to have spread from the body of COPIA-R7 into RPP7 intron1.
Mutations of EDM2 do not affect the rate of RPP7 transcription. The degree of immunity conferred by this disease resistance gene is positively correlated with levels of the RPP7 RNA isoform, which encodes an immune receptor. Therefore, a regulatory mechanism in RPP7 expression through APA can act as a switch to define levels of the biologically functional mRNA. Indeed, we found this gene regulatory mechanism to fine-tune RPP7-coding transcript levels in responses to pathogen.
In the suvh456 triple mutant, H3K9me2 is depleted at all of the tested RPP7 regions, indicating that at least one of the SUVH4, -5, and -6 methyltransferases is responsible for this histone mark at RPP7. Similar to edm2 mutants, we observed, in suvh456 plants, enhanced use of the promoter-proximal APAS, resulting in enhanced ECL transcript and reduced RPP7-coding transcript levels. These observations clearly show that H3K9me2 can trigger this gene regulation mechanism and confirms the effects of EDM2 on RPP7 expression to be driven by changes in H3K9me2 levels.
In addition to histone modifications, nucleosome positioning has been implicated as a determinant of the choice of alternative polyadenylation sites in humans (19). However, we did not observe any significant difference of total histone H3 levels at any of the tested RPP7 regions in edm2 mutants compared with those in Col-0 (Fig. S7). Thus, enhanced use of the promoter-proximal APAS in edm2 mutants possibly is solely the consequence of reduced levels of H3K9me2 and not due to changes in nucleosome density.
Only a small number of natural A. thaliana variants seem to lack COPIA-R7 in their RPP7 orthologs. We experimentally confirmed the absence of COPIA-R7 in the two Arabidopsis accessions Krazo-2 and Koch-1. Besides COPIA-R7, short fragments derived from different types of TEs are present in intron1 and intron2 of Col-0 RPP7 (Fig. S5). Their presence is most likely the consequence of repeated TE insertions and their removal by illegitimate recombination (35). Thus, the COPIA-R7 insertion in intron1 is likely beneficial for RPP7 and, therefore, got stabilized whereas other TE insertions in intron1 and intron2 were not domesticated.
In Krazo-2 and Koch-1, expression control of RPP7 was shown to be independent of EDM2, indicating that the COPIA-R7 insertion in RPP7 is required for the influence of EDM2 on RPP7 expression. Surprisingly, we found ECL transcripts also to be generated in Krazo-2 and Koch-1 although no TE-related DNA sequences exist in intron1 of their respective RPP7 orthologs. Instead, a sequence block that is not present in Col-0 RPP7 was found to act as the terminator of ECL transcripts in Krazo-2 and Koch-1. Thus, Krazo-2 and Koch-1 also use a mechanism of APA-mediated balance between ECL and full RPP7-coding transcripts. In these accessions, however, this mechanism is not under EDM2-mediated H3K9me2 control. Based on our observations, it is plausible that the APA-mediated RPP7 expression mechanism was developed in ancestral A. thaliana plants before Col-0 and Krazo-2/Koch-1 evolutionally diverged. Thus, the insertion of COPIA-R7 carrying epigenetic information of H3K9me2 into RPP7 intron1 of Col-0 and utilization of this transposon’s 5′-LTR instead of NIC as an alternative ECL terminator in Col-0 coopted an EDM2-dependent epigenetic mechanism to the control of RPP7 expression. This epigenetic mechanism may have equipped its hosts with a selective advantage, as it provided an additional switch to fine-tune levels of RPP7-coding transcripts in response to pathogen recognition.
Materials and Methods
Arabidopsis Mutants and Natural Accessions.
A. thaliana accessions Col-0 (CS70000), Krazo-2 (CS76422), and Koch-1 (CS76396) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC, Ohio State University). The edm2-2, edm2-3, and edm2-4 alleles have been described previously (23). The suvh4 suvh5 suvh6 triple mutant (suvh456) was kindly provided by Judith Bender (Brown University, Providence, RI). All mutant plants used are exclusively in the Col-0 background.
Transgenic Lines.
The transgenic complementation lines (E2pro:HA-E2) were generated as described previously (24). To generate EDM2 silencing lines in Arabidopsis natural variants, a DNA trigger sequence was cloned into the pJawohl8-RNAi vector (GenBank AF408413; kindly provided by Imre E. Somssich, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany), and plants were transformed with the resulting pJawohl8-EDM2 binary vector by the floral dipping method (36). Additional experimental procedures are available in SI Materials and Methods.
qRT-PCR Analysis.
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) and reverse-transcribed with Maxima reverse transcriptase (Thermo Scientific) and oligo(dT)18 or gene-specific primers. Real-time PCR was performed with the MyiQ detection system (Bio-Rad). The primers used for RT-PCRs are listed in Table S1. Details are described in SI Materials and Methods.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation.
Details of ChIP procedures are described in SI Materials and Methods. We used commercially available antibodies specific to dimethyl H3K9 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries; 308–32361), monomethyl and trimethyl H3K27 (Millipore; 07–448, lot no. 2019561; Abcam; ab6002), trimethyl H3K4 (Millipore; 05–1339), HA-tag (Abcam; ab9110), Histone H3 C-terminal (Active Motif; 61277), or RNAPII (Abcam; ab5408). The primers used for ChIPs are listed in Table S1.
RACE.
The 5′− and 3′RACE were performed using GeneRacer kit (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer's instruction. The primers used for RACEs are listed in Table S1.
Genomic DNA and cDNA Cloning in Arabidopsis Natural Accessions.
The genomic DNA fragments of RPP7krazo-2 and RPP7Koch-1 were PCR-amplified with primers designed using the Col-0 RPP7 as the reference. These genomic fragments were sequenced and assembled based on overlapping sequences. The regions including junctions between the PCR fragments were then PCR-amplified using genomic DNA as template to verify their continuity in the genomes. cDNAs of RPP7krazo-2 and RPP7Koch-1 were cloned by PCR with primers designed with the revealed genomic sequences. cDNAs of EDM2krazo-2 and EDM2Koch-1 were PCR-amplified with primers designed using the cDNA sequence of Col-0 EDM2 as the reference. The primers used for genomic DNA and cDNA cloning are listed in Table S1.
Hyaloperonospora Arabidopsidis Infection.
The H. arabidopsidis isolate Hiks1 (HpaHiks1) was described previously (37, 38). HpaHiks1 was grown, propagated, and applied to Arabidopsis plants as described previously (39). Using Preval sprayers, 1-wk-old seedlings were spray-inoculated with spore suspensions of HpaHiks1 (5 × 104 spores per mL). Plants were scored at 7 d after infection for severity of infection by lactophenol trypan blue staining (40).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank J. N. Bailey-Serres and Mercedes Schroeder (both University of California, Riverside) for critical reading of the manuscript; I. E. Somssich (Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research) for the pJawohl8-RNAi vector; J. Bender (Brown University) for providing the suvh456 mutant; E. Holub (Warwick HRI) for providing the H. arabidopsidis isolates Hiks1; the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center stock center for providing Arabidopsis natural accessions and T-DNA mutants; and the A. thaliana 1001 Genomes Project for genome sequencing data. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant IOS 1052556 (to T. E.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Database deposition: The nucleic acid sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. KF112064–KF112069).
See Commentary on page 14821.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1312545110/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Rigal M, Mathieu O. A “mille-feuille” of silencing: Epigenetic control of transposable elements. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1809(8):452–458. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jackson JP, Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jacobsen SE. Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature. 2002;416(6880):556–560. doi: 10.1038/nature731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson L, Cao X, Jacobsen S. Interplay between two epigenetic marks: DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr Biol. 2002;12(16):1360–1367. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00976-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ebbs ML, Bartee L, Bender J. H3 lysine 9 methylation is maintained on a transcribed inverted repeat by combined action of SUVH6 and SUVH4 methyltransferases. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(23):10507–10515. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.23.10507-10515.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ebbs ML, Bender J. Locus-specific control of DNA methylation by the Arabidopsis SUVH5 histone methyltransferase. Plant Cell. 2006;18(5):1166–1176. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.041400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jacob Y, et al. ATXR5 and ATXR6 are H3K27 monomethyltransferases required for chromatin structure and gene silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(7):763–768. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bennetzen JL. Transposable elements, gene creation and genome rearrangement in flowering plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15(6):621–627. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weil C, Martienssen R. Epigenetic interactions between transposons and genes: Lessons from plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008;18(2):188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dooner HK, Weil CF. Give-and-take: Interactions between DNA transposons and their host plant genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17(6):486–492. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lisch D. How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(1):49–61. doi: 10.1038/nrg3374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Orphanides G, Reinberg D. A unified theory of gene expression. Cell. 2002;108(4):439–451. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00655-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu X, et al. Genome-wide landscape of polyadenylation in Arabidopsis provides evidence for extensive alternative polyadenylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(30):12533–12538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019732108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Di Giammartino DC, Nishida K, Manley JL. Mechanisms and consequences of alternative polyadenylation. Mol Cell. 2011;43(6):853–866. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Millevoi S, Vagner S. Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic pre-mRNA 3′ end processing regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(9):2757–2774. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pandya-Jones A, Black DL. Co-transcriptional splicing of constitutive and alternative exons. RNA. 2009;15(10):1896–1908. doi: 10.1261/rna.1714509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de la Mata M, Lafaille C, Kornblihtt AR. First come, first served revisited: Factors affecting the same alternative splicing event have different effects on the relative rates of intron removal. RNA. 2010;16(5):904–912. doi: 10.1261/rna.1993510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moore MJ, Proudfoot NJ. Pre-mRNA processing reaches back to transcription and ahead to translation. Cell. 2009;136(4):688–700. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Luco RF, Allo M, Schor IE, Kornblihtt AR, Misteli T. Epigenetics in alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Cell. 2011;144(1):16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spies N, Nielsen CB, Padgett RA, Burge CB. Biased chromatin signatures around polyadenylation sites and exons. Mol Cell. 2009;36(2):245–254. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mavrich TN, et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 2008;18(7):1073–1083. doi: 10.1101/gr.078261.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lian Z, et al. A genomic analysis of RNA polymerase II modification and chromatin architecture related to 3′ end RNA polyadenylation. Genome Res. 2008;18(8):1224–1237. doi: 10.1101/gr.075804.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maekawa T, Kufer TA, Schulze-Lefert P. NLR functions in plant and animal immune systems: So far and yet so close. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(9):817–826. doi: 10.1038/ni.2083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eulgem T, et al. EDM2 is required for RPP7-dependent disease resistance in Arabidopsis and affects RPP7 transcript levels. Plant J. 2007;49(5):829–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tsuchiya T, Eulgem T. Mutations in EDM2 selectively affect silencing states of transposons and induce plant developmental plasticity. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1701. doi: 10.1038/srep01701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xiao S, Brown S, Patrick E, Brearley C, Turner JG. Enhanced transcription of the Arabidopsis disease resistance genes RPW8.1 and RPW8.2 via a salicylic acid-dependent amplification circuit is required for hypersensitive cell death. Plant Cell. 2003;15(1):33–45. doi: 10.1105/tpc.006940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yi H, Richards EJ. A cluster of disease resistance genes in Arabidopsis is coordinately regulated by transcriptional activation and RNA silencing. Plant Cell. 2007;19(9):2929–2939. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.051821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Holt BF, 3rd, Belkhadir Y, Dangl JL. Antagonistic control of disease resistance protein stability in the plant immune system. Science. 2005;309(5736):929–932. doi: 10.1126/science.1109977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li F, et al. MicroRNA regulation of plant innate immune receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(5):1790–1795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118282109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bomblies K, et al. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(9):e236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tsuchiya T, Eulgem T. EMSY-like genes are required for full RPP7-mediated race-specific immunity and basal defense in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011;24(12):1573–1581. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-11-0123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu F, Marquardt S, Lister C, Swiezewski S, Dean C. Targeted 3′ processing of antisense transcripts triggers Arabidopsis FLC chromatin silencing. Science. 2010;327(5961):94–97. doi: 10.1126/science.1180278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kumar A, Bennetzen JL. Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet. 1999;33:479–532. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.33.1.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cao J, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):956–963. doi: 10.1038/ng.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tsuchiya T, Eulgem T. Co-option of EDM2 to distinct regulatory modules in Arabidopsis thaliana development. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Devos KM, Brown JK, Bennetzen JL. Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 2002;12(7):1075–1079. doi: 10.1101/gr.132102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Holub EB, Beynon JL, Crute IR. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of interactions between isolates of Peronospora parasitica and accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. MPMI-Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions. 1994;7(2):223–239. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Parker JE, et al. Phenotypic characterization and molecular mapping of the Arabidopsis thaliana locus RPP5, determining disease resistance to Peronospora parasitica. Plant J. 1993;4(5):821–831. [Google Scholar]
- 39.McDowell JM, et al. Downy mildew (Peronospora parasitica) resistance genes in Arabidopsis vary in functional requirements for NDR1, EDS1, NPR1 and salicylic acid accumulation. Plant J. 2000;22(6):523–529. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koch E, Slusarenko A. Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. Plant Cell. 1990;2(5):437–445. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.5.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tsuchiya T, Eulgem T. The Arabidopsis defense component EDM2 affects the floral transition in an FLC-dependent manner. Plant J. 2010;62(3):518–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04169.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.