Abstract
ING3 (inhibitor of growth family, member 3) is a subunit of the nucleosome acetyltransferase of histone 4 (NuA4) complex, which activates gene expression. ING3, which contains a plant homeodomain (PHD) motif that can bind to trimethylated lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me3), is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian tissues and governs transcriptional regulation, cell cycle control, and apoptosis via p53-mediated transcription or the Fas/caspase-8 pathway. Thus, ING3 plays a number of important roles in various somatic cells. However, the role(s) of ING3 in germ cells remains unknown. Here, we show that loss of ING3 function led to the failure of asymmetric cell division and cortical reorganization in the mouse oocyte. Immunostaining showed that in fully grown germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes, ING3 localized predominantly in the GV. After germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), ING3 homogeneously localized in the cytoplasm. In oocytes where Ing3 was targeted by siRNA microinjection, we observed symmetric cell division during mouse oocyte maturation. In those oocytes, oocyte polarization was not established due to the failure to form an actin cap or a cortical granule-free domain (CGFD), the lack of which inhibited spindle migration. These features were among the main causes of abnormal symmetric cell division. Interestingly, an analysis of the mRNA expression levels of genes related to asymmetric cell division revealed that only mTOR was downregulated, and, furthermore, that genes downstream of mTOR (e.g., Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA) were also downregulated in siIng3-injected oocytes. Therefore, ING3 may regulate asymmetric cell division through the mTOR pathway during mouse oocyte maturation.
Introduction
Oocyte maturation in mammals is characterized by a unique asymmetric cell division. After germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), the centrally positioned spindle migrates to the oocyte cortex; thereafter, asymmetric cell division occurs. Accordingly, the oocyte is transformed into a highly polarized, large metaphase II (MII)-arrested oocyte with an extruded small polar body [1]. Failure of this asymmetric cell division to occur is usually observed in low quality oocytes or those that have experienced post-ovulatory aging, a cause of mammalian infertility [2], [3]. Asymmetric cell division depends upon the position of the spindle that is formed after GVBD. In a normal mouse oocyte, the germinal vesicle (GV) exists in the proximity of the central area of the oocyte [4], so that the spindle is formed near the center of the oocyte just after GVBD. Normal asymmetric cell division is induced after the spindle migrates to the oocyte cortex during meiotic maturation. It has been reported that spindle migration depends upon oocyte polarization, e.g., the formation of an actin cap, where microfilaments are enriched, and a cortical granule free domain (CGFD), where cortical granules (CGs) are redistributed [5]–[9]. However, details of the molecular mechanisms underlying oocyte polarization are poorly understood.
During oocyte growth in the mouse, dynamic changes occur in chromatin structure and histone modifications. With respect to histones H3 and H4, the levels of methylated (H3K4) and acetylated lysine residues (H3K9, H3K18, H4K5, and H4K12), which are associated with active gene expression, increase during mouse oogenesis and peak in fully grown GV oocytes [10]. A previous study showed that deficiency of Mll2, a H3K4 methyltransferase, in mouse oocytes causes anovulation and oocyte death [11]. In Mll2-deficient oocytes, the levels of di- and trimethylated H3K4 (H3K4me2/3) are decreased, and abnormal maturation and aberrant gene expression, especially in apoptosis-related genes, are observed [11]. These results suggest that the levels of H3K4me2/3 in oocytes are important for mouse oocyte maturation. ING (inhibition of growth) family members contain a plant homeodomain (PHD) motif through which the proteins can bind to H3K4me3, and are highly conserved from yeast to humans [12]. ING family proteins have been found as subunits of chromatin remodeling complexes [13], and are involved in transcriptional regulation, DNA repair, tumorigenesis, apoptosis, cellular senescence, and cell cycle arrest [14], [15]. ING3 is an important subunit of the human NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex [16]. ING3 is a tumor suppressor in melanoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and is involved in the regulation of p53-mediated transcription, cell cycle control, and apoptosis [17]–[19]. Previous studies have demonstrated that overexpression of ING3 in the human colorectal cancer cell line, RKO, suppresses cell growth through cell cycle control and induces apoptosis in a p53-dependent manner; however, no direct interactions between ING3 and p53 have been confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation [17]. In melanoma cells, the overexpression of ING3 induced FAS expression and promoted UV-induced apoptosis through a FAS/CASPASE-8-dependent pathway in a p53-independent manner [20]. Although ING3 is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian tissues, it has been reported that ING3 is more highly expressed in mouse, rhesus monkey, and human oocytes [21]. However, the role(s) of ING3 in oocytes is unknown.
In the present study, we investigated whether ING3 functions during mouse oocyte maturation. We found that the loss of ING3 function after siRNA treatment inhibited actin cap and CGFD formation, as well as oocyte polarization, leading to symmetric cell division. Since ING3 is involved in transcriptional regulation [14], [15], we also investigated whether ING3 regulated genes involved in asymmetric cell division during oocyte maturation. Interestingly, we found that among several asymmetric cell division–related genes, only mTOR expression was downregulated. Furthermore, mTOR’s downstream genes, the Rho-family small GTPases (e.g., Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA) were also downregulated in oocytes after siRNA injection. It has also been reported that GTPases, including Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA, can activate actin polymerization [22]–[24]. Given these results, we propose that ING3 plays an important role in governing asymmetric cell division during mouse oocyte maturation by regulating actin polymerization via the mTOR pathway.
Materials and Methods
Oocyte Collection and Culture
Fully grown GV oocytes were collected from the ovaries of 8- to 10-week-old ICR mice (SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) in M2 medium containing 5.0 µM Milrinone (138-13801, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). Milrinone, which increases cAMP, was used to inhibit GVBD. For maturation, oocytes were washed and cultured in M16 medium containing 4 mg/ml BSA (A311, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) under mineral oil (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C, in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.
Immunofluorescent Staining
Oocytes were collected for immunofluorescent staining after 0, 2, 8, 9.5, or 12 h in culture, at which point most of the oocytes had reached the fully grown GV, GVBD, MI, ATI, or MII stages, respectively. For α-tubulin and actin staining, oocytes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) for 30 min at room temperature (RT). After washing three times in PBS containing 0.3% polyvinylpirrolidone (PVP K-30, Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan; PBS/PVP), oocytes were treated with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 40 min at RT, blocked in PBS containing 1.0% BSA (A9647, Sigma-Aldrich; blocking solution) for 1 h at RT and incubated overnight at 4°C with a FITC-conjugated anti-α-tubulin antibody (1∶200 dilution; F2168, Sigma-Aldrich) or 2 µg/ml TRITC-conjugated phalloidin (P1951, Sigma-Aldrich) in blocking solution. For staining of ING3, cortical granules (CGs), acetylated H4K12 (AcH4K12), and mTOR, zona pellucidae were removed from the oocytes by acid Tyrode’s solution (pH 2.5) and oocytes were fixed in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at 4°C. After washing three times in PBS/PVP, oocytes were treated with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 40 min at RT, blocked in blocking solution for 1 h at RT, and incubated overnight at 4°C with one of the following reagents diluted into blocking solution: mouse anti-ING3 antibody (1∶100 dilution, sc-101245, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX); 2 µg/ml FITC-conjugated lectin (L7381, Sigma-Aldrich); rabbit anti-AcH4K12 antibody (1∶300 dilution 06-761, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA); or rabbit anti-mTOR antibody (1∶2000 dilution, ab2732, Abcam Ltd., Cambridge, UK). For ING3, AcH4K12, and mTOR staining, oocytes were washed three times in blocking solution and then incubated in blocking solution containing the secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, 1∶500 dilution, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA; Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1∶500 dilution, Invitrogen; or Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1∶500 dilution, Invitrogen) for 1 h at RT. After staining of α-tubulin, actin, ING3, CGs, AcH4K12, and mTOR, oocytes were washed three times in blocking solution for 15 min and nuclei were stained in PBS containing 10 µg/ml Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min. After immunofluorescent staining, oocytes were mounted on slides in 50% glycerol/PBS and fluorescent signals were detected using a fluorescence microscope (BX50, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). At least 20 oocytes were examined for each group.
Triton Treatment of Oocytes Prior to PFA Fixation
Triton treatment prior to PFA fixation was performed in order to examine whether protein was bound to chromatin [26], [27]. Oocytes were treated with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 s. Then, they were washed with PBS three times and fixed in 4% PFA for 5 min at RT. After washing with PBS, immunofluorescent staining was performed as described above.
Ing3 siRNA Injection
Approximately 5–10 pl of 50 µM Ing3 siRNA (siIng3; RNAi Inc., Japan, 5′-GGAUGAGAGGCGUUUACGUGC-3′) in annealing buffer consisting of 30 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.4), 100 mM KOAc and 2 mM Mg(OAc)2 was microinjected into the cytoplasm of a fully grown GV oocyte. The same amount of negative control siRNA (siControl; RNAi Inc.), which contains scrambled sequences from the siIng3 construct, was also microinjected as a control. After injection, the oocytes were cultured in M16 medium containing 5.0 µM Milrinone and 4 mg/ml BSA for 15.5 h, and then washed five times in fresh M16 medium containing 4 mg/ml BSA. Then, the oocytes were transferred to fresh M16 medium containing 4 mg/ml BSA and cultured under mineral oil at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air or harvested for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) or immunoblotting.
RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA from 50 fully grown GV oocytes was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNase-free DNase I (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN) was added to the preparations to avoid genomic DNA contamination. For reverse transcription, Rever Tra Ace (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and Oligo dT primer (Invitrogen) were used, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was carried out with THUNDERBIRD qPCR Mix (Toyobo Co., Ltd.) using Rotor-Gene 6000 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Transcription levels were determined three times and normalized to Gapdh; relative gene expression was analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method [25]. All primers used for PCR are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Primers used for qRT-PCR.
Genes | GenBank Accession No. | Forward | Reverse |
Ing3 | NM_023626.4 | ttcacatactcccgtggaaaa | gcgcttcagatttgaatttctt |
Arpc3 | NM_019824.3 | gaaggaaatgtacacgctaggaa | gaggtacgcacgcatcatc |
JMY | NM_021310.3 | ttcaaattacaagccgtgcacccg | agctgccttctggacctttactga |
mTOR | NM_020009.2 | cttggagaaccagcccataa | ctggtttcaccaaaccgtct |
ARF1 | NM_001130408.1 | Atgcgcattctcatggtg | aacagtctccacattgaaacca |
Hsp90α | NM_010480.5 | ggagataaatcctgatcactcca | caagatgaccagatccttcaca |
Fmn2 | NM_019445.2 | gagacccttcaagctctctatga | gaagatcgactgtgcttttcaa |
Mos | NM_020021.2 | aagggaaaggaactgggatg | aacagccagggaagtttgg |
Whamm | NM_001004185.3 | cagccatttagagacatgcgagaa | ctaggacccagctcatcctcatc |
Cdc42 | NM_001243769.1 | ttgttggtgatggtgctgtt | aatcctcttgccctgcagta |
Rac1 | NM_009007.2 | agatgcaggccatcaagtgt | gagcaggcaggttttaccaa |
RhoA | NM_016802.4 | acaactgcatcccagaacct | taccacaagctccatcacca |
Immunoblotting
Fifty fully grown GV oocytes were collected in SDS sample buffer and boiled at 95°C for 4 min. The samples were kept at −80°C until use. Total protein was separated by 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for 90 min at 20 mA and electrophoretically transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore, Bedford, MA) over 2 h at 50 V. After three washes in Tris buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST), the membrane was blocked in TBST containing 5% skim milk for 1 h, and then incubated with either a mouse anti-ING3 antibody (1∶200 dilution) or a mouse anti-α-tubulin antibody (1∶5000 dilution; T9026; Sigma-Aldrich) in TBST containing 2% skim milk overnight at 4°C. After three washes in TBST, the membrane was incubated with an HRP-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1∶2000 or 1∶10000 dilution; GE Healthcare UK Ltd, Amersham, UK) in TBST for 1 h at RT. The membrane was extensively washed three times with TBST, and then processed with the Enhanced Chemilumidescence (ECL) detection system (GE Healthcare UK Ltd). α-tubulin was detected as an internal control.
Ethical Approval for the Use of Animals
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Kyoto University (Permit Number: 24-17) and were performed in accordance with the committee’s guidelines.
Statistical Analysis
Each experiment was repeated at least three times. The values were analyzed using a t-test. p values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Localization of ING3 during Oocyte Maturation in the Mouse
To investigate the role(s) of ING3 during mouse oocyte maturation, ING3 localization was initially examined at different stages of meiotic maturation. In the fully grown GV oocyte, ING3 was localized in GV. After GVBD, ING3 was dispersed homogenously into the cytoplasm (Fig. 1). Furthermore, ING3 bound to the chromatin in fully grown GV oocytes (Fig. 1B).
Loss of ING3 Function Leads to Spindle Migration Failure and the Formation of a Large Polar Body
The results of qRT-PCR and immunoblotting showed that the amount of Ing3 mRNA and protein was dramatically decreased in siIng3-injected oocytes (Fig. 2A, B). After maturation in culture, siIng3-injected oocytes exhibited symmetric cell division, showing 2-cell-like MII oocytes. Furthermore, the rate of symmetric cell division was significantly higher than that observed in siControl-injected oocytes. However, polar body (PB) extrusion was observed in most of the population (Fig. 2C–E). To analyze the phenotype of siing3-injected oocytes, spindle migration was confirmed by immunostaining of α-tubulin. After 9.5 h in culture, the spindles moved to the cortex of the oocytes in siControl-injected oocytes, but remained centrally located in siIng3-injected oocytes (Fig. 3A, B). Moreover, the rate of symmetric cell division was dramatically increased at the end of the first meiosis in siIng3-injected oocytes (Fig. 3C).
Loss of ING3 Function Abrogates Cortical Reorganization
Since spindle migration and asymmetric cell division are intimately related to oocyte polarity, the formation of the actin cap and CGFD, predominant features of oocyte polarization, was examined. As shown in Fig. 4A, in siControl-injected oocytes the chromosomes had already moved to the cortical layer, the site of actin cap formation, by the MI stage after 9.5 h in culture, and at the ATI stage, the chromosomes dissociated at the region of the cortex with the actin cap. By the MII stage, a small PB and a large MII oocyte had formed and the chromosomes were located under the region of the cortex where the actin cap formed. By contrast, in siIng3-injected oocytes, the chromosomes had not moved from the center of the cytoplasm and no actin cap was observed at the MI stage after 9.5 h in culture, and at the ATI stage, the chromosomes dissociated around the center of the cytoplasm. By the MII stage, an MII oocyte formed a 2-cell-like structure with no actin cap. As shown in Fig. 4B, in siControl-injected oocytes, CGs were lacking near the cortical layer where the chromosomes were located at the MI and MII stages, whereas in siIng3-injected oocytes the chromosomes had not moved from the center of the cytoplasm and CGs were widely distributed through the cortical layer at the MI stage and were intensely localized in the cell adhesion region at the MII stage.
ING3 Regulates mTOR Expression in GV Oocytes
The proportion of AcH4K12 that is acetylated by the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex [13] in the fully grown GV oocyte was confirmed by immunofluorescent staining. In siIng3-injected oocytes, the levels of AcH4K12 were decreased (Fig. 5A). To investigate the influence of this reduction in AcH4K12 levels in fully grown GV oocytes, the expression levels of the genes involved in asymmetric cell division were examined. In siIng3-injected oocytes, the expression of mTOR was significantly downregulated as compared with the expression of Arpc3, JMY, ARF1, Hsp90α, Fmn2, Mos, or Whamm (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, immunostaining and qRT-PCR data showed that mTOR protein levels and mRNA levels of Rho-family GTPases, such as Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA, were also decreased in siIng3-injected oocytes (Fig. 5C, D).
Discussion
ING3, which is an important subunit of the human NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex and can recognize H3K4me3, is mainly known as a tumor suppressor gene. ING family proteins are involved in chromatin remodeling and regulate transcription [14]. ING3 activates p53-transactivated promoters and modulates p53-mediated transcription, cell cycle control, and apoptosis [17]. Here, we observed the subcellular localization of ING3 at different stages of meiotic maturation and the binding of ING3 to the chromatin in fully grown GV oocytes. Together with the knowledge that ING3 is an important subunit of the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex, these observations suggested that ING3 functions as a chromatin remodeling factor in fully grown GV oocytes. We also found that loss of ING3 function led to symmetric cell division due to a failure in spindle migration. Asymmetric cell division depends on the position of the spindle that is formed after GVBD. The maintenance of a central spindle position leads to symmetric cell division, a feature observed in aging mouse oocytes [2], [3], [26]. Spindle migration is mainly regulated by actin filaments during oocyte maturation [1], [5], [6], and therefore is blocked by the inhibition of actin polymerization. In oocytes treated with cytochalasin D, an inhibitor of actin polymerization, spindle migration does not occur [27]. During mitosis of somatic cells, actin filaments are formed with polymerized actin and actin polymerization is regulated by the interaction of proteins called nucleation promoting factors (NPFs) with the Arp2/3 complex [28]. NPFs initially interact with an actin monomer and polymerize actins to induce the formation of unbranched actin filaments. NPFs, actin filaments, and an actin monomer cooperate to stimulate the inactive Arp2/3 complex to form actin filament branches on the side of existing filaments [29]. During mouse oocyte maturation, Arp2/3 co-localizes with the actin cap. This subcellular localization is changed in oocytes treated with cytochalasin B, which is also an inhibitor of actin polymerization, and the loss of function of the Arp2/3 complex causes symmetric cell division because the actin cap does not form where actin filaments are converged by phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P3) [30], [31]. Together, these results suggest that actin polymerization is a key regulator of asymmetric cell division in the mouse. In addition, actin polymerization is also involved in oocyte polarization through formation of the actin cap. Oocyte polarization, as indicated by the formation of the actin cap and CGFD, is one of the most important processes underlying asymmetric cell division during oocyte maturation [7]–[9], and the disruption of oocyte polarization results in symmetric cell division [31]–[35]. Thus, the disruption of oocyte polarization in Ing3-inhibited oocytes abrogated spindle migration and led to symmetric cell division.
It has been reported that the loss of function of Arp2/3, JMY, mTOR, ARF1, Hsp90α, GM130, Fmn2, Mos, or Whamm during mouse oocyte maturation disrupts oocyte polarity, impedes spindle migration, and leads to symmetric cell division [31]–[39]. Since ING3 is an important subunit of the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex, which activates gene expression, and ING3 bound to the chromatin in the fully grown GV oocytes, it is possible that ING3 regulates some genes that are involved in asymmetric cell division during oocyte maturation through histone acetylation. Indeed, we found that ING3 regulated the expression of mTOR and is involved in histone acetylation in fully grown GV oocytes, suggesting that ING3 regulates the expression of mTOR through histone acetylation. During mitosis in somatic cells, mTOR regulates actin polymerization by activating small GTPases (Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA). In turn, activated small GTPases regulate the actin cytoskeleton and microtubule dynamics through the activation of NPFs [22], [23]. Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA cooperate temporally and spatially to regulate actin dynamics and have an influence on cellular processes including cell motility, cell polarization, cell adhesion, and cytokinesis [24]. During oocyte maturation, mTOR also regulates oocyte polarization through its involvement in actin cap formation via the activation of small GTPases. Therefore, loss of mTOR function leads to symmetric cell division [32]. Thus, the observation that ING3 regulates the expression of mTOR and Rho-family small GTPases in fully grown GV oocytes suggests that ING3 plays important roles in actin polymerization via the mTOR pathway during mouse oocyte maturation.
Nonetheless, our results were slightly different from those obtained in mTOR inhibited oocytes. Namely, in mTOR-inhibited oocytes during mouse oocyte maturation cell cycle stages are delayed after 9.5 h in culture [32]. By contrast, loss of ING3 function did not delay the progression of cell cycle stages over 9.5 h in culture; however, the rate of symmetric cell division in oocytes at the end of first meiosis was significantly increased. It is probable that cell cycle regulation by RhoA proteins [40] was not sufficiently abrogated after microinjection of siIng3 in the fully grown GV oocytes despite the decrease observed in RhoA mRNA. This may explain the lack of notable effect on the cell cycle in these oocytes.
In eukaryotic cells, chromatin serves as a dynamic and active participant in multiple nuclear processes, and plays a remarkable role in the regulation of gene expression. Many histone methyltransferases and chromatin remodeling factors have pivotal roles in biological processes during development and disease, e.g., neurological disorders and cancer [16], [41]. In addition, it has been reported that the levels of di- and trimethylated H3K4 in oocytes are important for maturation in the mouse [11], [42]. In oocytes lacking functional Mll2, the levels of di- and trimethylated lysine are decreased, chromosomes are misaligned, and maturation is arrested [11], suggesting that histone methyltransferase is important for meiosis. However, the roles of genes that govern histone methylation during mouse oocyte maturation are poorly understood. It has been reported that ING3 is a member of the ING family of proteins that bind to H3K4me3, and that ING3 is an important subunit of the human NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex [13], [16], [43]. The NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex governs the acetylation of histones H4 and H2A [16]. In this study, we found that ING3 was involved in the asymmetric cell division of mouse oocytes during the first meiotic cell division, and that ING3 promoted H4K12 acetylation, suggesting that the chromatin remodeling factors involved in the recognition of methylated H3K4 also function during mouse oocyte maturation.
In conclusion, our results demonstrated that ING3 function is critical for maintaining asymmetric cell division, and indicated the possibility that an elucidation of the genes involved in chromatin remodeling may shed light on the molecular mechanisms of mouse oocyte maturation.
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture to N.M. (grant 23380164). No additional external funding was received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Maro B, Verlhac MH (2002) Polar body formation: new rules for asymmetric divisions. Nature Cell Biology 4. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2. Webb M, Howlett SK, Maro B (1986) Parthenogenesis and cytoskeletal organization in ageing mouse eggs. J Embryol Exp Morphol 95: 131–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H (2009) Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Hum Reprod Update. England. 573–585. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4. Alexandre H, Mulnard J (1988) Time-lapse cinematography study of the germinal vesicle behaviour in mouse primary oocytes treated with activators of protein kinases A and C. Gamete Res. 21: 359–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sun QY, Schatten H (2006) Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization. Reproduction 131: 193–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Azoury J, Verlhac M-H, Dumont J (2009) Actin filaments: key players in the control of asymmetric divisions in mouse oocytes. Biology of the Cell 101: 69–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deng MQ, Kishikawa H, Yanagimachi R, Kopf GS, Schultz RM, et al.. (2003) Chromatin-mediated cortical granule redistribution is responsible for the formation of the cortical granule-free domain in mouse eggs. Developmental Biology 257. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 8.Longo FJ, Chen DY (1985) Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: involvement of the meiotic apparatus. Dev Biol. United States. 382–394. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9. Van Blerkom J, Bell H (1986) Regulation of development in the fully grown mouse oocyte: chromosome-mediated temporal and spatial differentiation of the cytoplasm and plasma membrane. J Embryol Exp Morphol 93: 213–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kageyama S-i, Liu H, Kaneko N, Ooga M, Nagata M, et al. (2007) Alterations in epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth in mice. Reproduction 133: 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Andreu-Vieyra CV, Chen R, Agno JE, Glaser S, Anastassiadis K, et al.. (2010) MLL2 Is Required in Oocytes for Bulk Histone 3 Lysine 4 Trimethylation and Transcriptional Silencing. Plos Biology 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12. He GHY, Helbing CC, Wagner MJ, Sensen CW, Riabowol K (2005) Phylogenetic analysis of the ING family of PHD finger proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 104–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Doyon Y, Cayrou C, Ullah M, Landry AJ, Cote V, et al. (2006) ING tumor suppressor proteins are critical regulators of chromatin acetylation required for genome expression and perpetuation. Molecular Cell 21: 51–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Aguissa-Toure A-H, Wong RPC, Li G (2011) The ING family tumor suppressors: from structure to function. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68: 45–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jafarnejad SM, Li G (2012) Regulation of p53 by ING family members in suppression of tumor initiation and progression. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 31: 55–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Doyon Y, Cote J (2004) The highly conserved and multifunctional NuA4 HAT complex. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 14. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17. Nagashima M, Shiseki M, Pedeux RM, Okamura S, Kitahama-Shiseki M, et al. (2003) A novel PHD-finger motif protein, p47ING3, modulates p53-mediated transcription, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. Oncogene 22: 343–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Coles AH, Jones SN (2009) The ING Gene Family in the Regulation of Cell Growth and Tumorigenesis. Journal of Cellular Physiology 218: 45–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lu M, Chen F, Wang Q, Wang K, Pan Q, et al.. (2012) Downregulation of inhibitor of growth 3 is correlated with tumorigenesis and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology Letters 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20. Wang YM, Li G (2006) ING3 promotes UV-induced apoptosis via Fas/caspase-8 pathway in melanoma cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281: 11887–11893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Awe JP, Byrne JA (2013) Identifying Candidate Oocyte Reprogramming Factors Using Cross-Species Global Transcriptional Analysis. Cell Reprogram. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22. Wullschleger S, Loewith R, Hall MN (2006) TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell 124: 471–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Iden S, Collard JG (2008) Crosstalk between small GTPases and polarity proteins in cell polarization. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 9: 846–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jordan SN, Canman JC (2012) Rho GTPases in Animal Cell Cytokinesis: An Occupation by the One Percent. Cytoskeleton 69: 919–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. United States: 2001 Elsevier Science (USA). 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26. Sun SC, Gao WW, Xu YN, Jin YX, Wang QL, et al. (2012) Degradation of actin nucleators affects cortical polarity of aged mouse oocytes. Fertility and Sterility 97: 984–990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kubiak J, Paldi A, Weber M, Maro B (1991) Genetically identical parthenogenetic mouse embryos produced by inhibition of the first meiotic cleavage with cytochalasin D. Development. 111: 763–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pollard TD (2007) Regulation of actin filament assembly by Arp2/3 complex and formins. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 36: 451–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Fededa JP, Gerlich DW (2012) Molecular control of animal cell cytokinesis. Nature Cell Biology 14: 440–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zheng P, Baibakov B, Wang XH, Dean J (2012) PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 is constitutively synthesized and required for spindle translocation during meiosis in mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31. Sun SC, Wang ZB, Xu YN, Lee SE, Cui XS, et al. (2011) Arp2/3 complex regulates asymmetric division and cytokinesis in mouse oocytes. PLoS One 6: e18392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lee SE, Sun SC, Choi HY, Uhm SJ, Kim NH (2012) mTOR is required for asymmetric division through small GTPases in mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 79: 356–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sun SC, Sun QY, Kim NH (2011) JMY is required for asymmetric division and cytokinesis in mouse oocytes. Molecular Human Reproduction 17: 296–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang S, Hu J, Guo X, Liu JX, Gao S (2009) ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1 Regulates Asymmetric Cell Division in Female Meiosis in the Mouse. Biology of Reproduction 80: 555–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Metchat A, Akerfelt M, Bierkamp C, Delsinne V, Sistonen L, et al. (2009) Mammalian Heat Shock Factor 1 Is Essential for Oocyte Meiosis and Directly Regulates Hsp90 alpha Expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284: 9521–9528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhang CH, Wang ZB, Quan S, Huang X, Tong JS, et al. (2011) GM130, a cis-Golgi protein, regulates meiotic spindle assembly and asymmetric division in mouse oocyte. Cell Cycle 10: 1861–1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Dumont J, Million K, Sunderland K, Rassinier P, Lim H, et al. (2007) Formin-2 is required for spindle migration and for the late steps of cytokinesis in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 301: 254–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Huang X, Ding L, Pan R, Ma PF, Cheng PP, et al. (2013) WHAMM is required for meiotic spindle migration and asymmetric cytokinesis in mouse oocytes. Histochem Cell Biol 139: 525–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Verlhac MH, Lefebvre C, Guillaud P, Rassinier P, Maro B (2000) Asymmetric division in mouse oocytes: with or without Mos. Curr Biol 10: 1303–1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zhong ZS, Huo LJ, Liang CG, Chen DY, Sun QY (2005) Small GTPase RhoA is required for ooplasmic segregation and spindle rotation, but not for spindle organization and chromosome separation during mouse oocyte maturation, fertilization, and early cleavage. Mol Reprod Dev 71: 256–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Albert M, Helin K (2010) Histone methyltransferases in cancer. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 21: 209–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ma P, Schultz RM (2013) Histone Deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) Regulates Chromosome Segregation and Kinetochore Function via H4K16 Deacetylation during Oocyte Maturation in Mouse. PLoS Genet. United States. pp. e1003377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43. Mellor J (2006) It takes a PHD to read the histone code. Cell 126: 22–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]