Abstract
The construction of a small-size, magnetic sector, single focusing mass spectrometer (He-MS) for the continuous, on-site monitoring of He isotope ratios (3He/4He) is described. The instrument is capable of measuring 4He/20Ne ratios dissolved in several different types of natural fluids of geochemical interest, such as groundwater and gas from hot springs, volcanoes and gas well fields. The ion optics of He-MS was designed using an ion trajectory simulation program “TRIO,” which permits the simultaneous measurement of 3He and 4He with a double collector system under a mass resolution power (M/ΔM) of >700. The presently attained specifications of He-MS are; (1) a mass resolving power of ca. 430, sufficient to separate 3He+ from interfering ions, HD+ and H3+, (2) ultra-high vacuum conditions down to 3×10−8 Pa, and (3) a sufficiently high sensitivity to permit amounts of 3He to be detected at levels as small as 10−13 cm3 STP (3×106 atoms). Long term stability for 3He/4He analysis was examined by measuring the 3He/4He standard gas (HESJ) and atmospheric He, resulting in ∼3% reproducibility and ≤5% experimental error for various amounts of atmospheric He from 0.3 to 2.3×10−6 cm3 STP introduced into the instrument. A dynamic range of measurable 3He/4He ratios with He-MS is greater than 103 which was determined by measuring various types of natural fluid samples from continental gas (with a low 3He/4He ratio down to 2×10−8) to volcanic gas (with a high 3He/4He ratio up to 3×10−5). The accuracy and precision of 3He/4He and 4He/20Ne ratios were evaluated by comparing the values with those measured using well established noble gas mass spectrometers (modified VG5400/MS-III and -IV) in our laboratory, and were found to be in good agreement within analytical errors. Usefulness of the selective extraction of He from water/gas using a high permeability of He through a silica glass wall at high temperature (700°C) is demonstrated.
Keywords: small-size mass spectrometer, monitoring of 3He/4He ratio, He extraction from natural fluids
Introduction
Helium in several geochemical reservoirs of the Earth has characteristic isotopic ratios, i.e., 3He/4He=1.4×10−6 in air, 1.1×10−5 in the upper mantle, and <10−7 in the crust, resulting in a wide range of 3He/4He ratios of more than three orders of magnitude in geochemical/geological samples.1,2) The diffusivity of helium is very high compared to other geochemical tracers because of its low molecular weight and chemical inertness. Moreover He can escape from the Earth’s atmosphere to outer space because of its high velocity in the upper atmosphere, resulting in low concentrations of He in the atmosphere (5.2 ppm). These features make the 3He/4He ratio a very sensitive tracer for the transportation of volatiles and identification of their source reservoirs. Therefore, if we continuously monitor the isotopic ratio of He in fluids derived from the interior of the Earth, it would be possible to detect a change of 3He/4He ratio resulting from He release with various 3He/4He ratios from different reservoirs as the result of seismic or volcanic activities occurring in the crust and/or mantle. For example, variations in 3He/4He ratios in groundwater samples have been observed after earthquakes, which were considered to be the result of changes in groundwater flow systems due to the destruction of brittle, crustal rocks associated with earthquakes.3–5) Sano et al.6) reported post-eruptive increase in 3He/4He ratios in steam wells from volcanic islands, possibly resulting from additional magmatic He discharges from activated magmas. Predictive signals for earthquakes/volcanic eruptions have been observed as geophysical and geochemical signals such as ground deformation, seismic swarm, changes in the water level of observation wells, and radon emissions, during continuous monitoring with a time resolution of less than an hour or a day.7–9) On the contrary, sampling intervals in previous He studies were more than several days4,6) or even years.3,5) This is due to the complicated analytical procedures for determining He using an ultra-high vacuum system after transporting the samples to the laboratory. Such procedures include the purification of noble gases, separation of He from other noble gases (Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe), followed by time consuming work associated with mass spectrometry. This makes it difficult to detect an abrupt change in 3He/4He ratios associated with seismic or volcanic activities. Therefore, the continuous monitoring of 3He/4He ratios of natural fluids with a time resolution of less than one day would be highly desirable.
In addition to 3He/4He monitoring, the determination of the 4He/20Ne ratio could be a candidate because it can vary by more than 5 orders of magnitude from 0.3 to >40,000,10) as has been reported for gases and rocks. In such cases, 20Ne abundances are regarded as an indicator of the degree of contamination from the atmosphere, because 4He/20Ne ratios in the atmosphere can be as low as 0.32, while those in samples derived from the Earth’s deep interior often reach values of more than 100.1,2,10) A compact mass spectrometer with ion optics of a single-focusing magnetic-sector with large incident and exit angles was first designed and examined by Wu and Matsuda.11) Another mass spectrometer with the same ion optics was constructed and attained a mass resolving power of ∼600 at a 5% peak height, succeeded in measuring the 3He/4He ratio of atmospheric He.12) The mass spectrometer had the potential to be practically used for 3He/4He monitoring, but no applications have been reported to date.
We designed and constructed a mass spectrometer (He-MS) based on a new ion optics for the purpose of He isotope monitoring. In this paper, we report on the design, manufacture, tuning and evaluation of He-MS. The main objective was the continuous 3He/4He measurement to monitor 3He/4He variations in naturally occurring gases/groundwaters that are associated with seismic or volcanic activities deep underground.
Design and Manufacture of the He-MS
Required specifications and ion optics of He-MS
The He-MS was originally intended for use at an observation station such as a seismographic station, where groundwater or gas is continuously supplied from a monitoring well. For such purpose, a compact size is preferable, and there are additional requirements, 1) a simple system; 2) maintenance-free for a long period; 3) capable of the simultaneous measurement of 3He and 4He by a double collector system; 4) measurable 20Ne; 5) high vacuum condition; 6) large dispersion of ion trajectories to achieve high resolving power; and 7) high transmission of the ion beam inside the flight tube for achieving a sufficient high sensitivity to permit the minor isotope 3He to be detected.
To simultaneously satisfy three of the requirements, i.e., compact, large dispersion and high conductance, suitable ion optics was investigated with the computer programs, “TRIO” (Matsuo et al.)13) and “TRIO-DRAW” (Toyoda and Matsuo),14) for calculating ion trajectory considering third order aberration.
The designed ion optical system is basically a 90° deflection, single focusing and with 10 cm of the ion curvature, combined with an electrostatic quadrupole lens (Q-lens). A schematic diagram of the ion optics is illustrated in Fig. 1. Simulated ion trajectories from an exit slit of the ion source to the focal point in the x-axis (parallel to the curvature of the ion orbit) and y-axis (parallel to the direction of the sector magnetic field) using “TRIO-DRAW”14) are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. The Q-lens prevents the ion orbit from diverging in the y-direction and enables ions to pass through a narrow gap between the pole pieces of the main magnet. The combination of large incident and exit angles (29°20′) and the Q-lens allows high transmission for the ion beam and high mass dispersion. The large angles can improve the convergence in the small geometry by the lens effect at the fringing magnetic field. As a result, the ion optics achieves a high resolving power despite having a small ion orbit radius. Simulated mass spectra of 3He+ and HD+ by “TRIO-DRAW”14) are shown in Fig. 3, where an ion source exit slit size of 2 mm×0.1 mm is adopted. Based on the calculation, the theoretical mass resolving power is >700 in ideal conditions.
Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of the ion optical system of the mass spectrometer, He-MS. The shapes of the ion beams of 3He and 4He emitted from the ion source exit slit are regulated by the quadrupole lens (Q-lens), dispersed by the magnetic field with a dispersion angle of ca. 90° (incident and exit angles of 29°20′), gap width of 14 mm and radius of 100 mm and 115 mm for 3He and 4He, respectively, and then focused on each focal points where collector slits are placed. Two shunts regulate the edge of the magnetic field. Units for lengths are in mm.
Fig. 2. Ion trajectories simulated by “TRIO-DRAW” (Toyoda and Matsuo)14) in (a) x-direction (deviation from the main axis of ion orbital in horizontal direction to the plane of Fig. 1) and (b) y-direction (likewise in perpendicular direction to the Fig. 1 plane).
Fig. 3. Result of a simulation of a mass spectra (left: 3He; right: HD). Horizontal and vertical axes correspond to m/z and ion beam intensity, respectively, both with arbitrary units.
Plan of He-MS based on the ion optics
Figure 4 is a schematic showing the overall configuration of He-MS, which accommodates the design of ion optics obtained above. Most parts are made of SUS 304 with flanges of ConFlat-type with Cu-gaskets and with Au-gaskets. A conventional Nier type, electron impact ion source is installed. The ion source is the same as those used in modified-VG5400 mass spectrometers in our laboratory, which simplifies the evaluation and/or investigation of the performance as well as trouble shooting. A split-type flight tube was designed for the simultaneous detection of both 3He and 4He. Because of the low 3He/4He ratio (≤10−5) of naturally occurring He, the beam intensity of 3He is much weaker than the 4He ion beam, 3He is measured with a secondary electron multiplier operated in the ion-counting mode, while measuring 4He involves the use of a Faraday cup (“High Faraday” in Fig. 4). In the flight tube, the 3He ion beam passes a narrow collector slit (300 μm in width) so as to separate 3He ions from interfering HD and H3 ions with a resolving power of ≥500, while 4He is introduced into the outer flight tube, which passes through the wider collector slit (900 μm in width). In order to simultaneously obtain 3He and 4He signals, the position of the collector slit for 4He can be adjusted by means of a manipulator and the focal point of the 4He ion beam can be moved slightly by applying positive voltages to a pair of deflecting plates that are located in front of the collector slit. Another Faraday cup (“Axial Faraday”) can be inserted into the 3He beam line to measure a strong ion beam such as 20Ne+ and 40Ar+ (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Design drawing of the He-MS instrument, consisting of the ion source, Q-lens, flight-tube, and collectors. High and axial Faraday mean the Faraday cup for 4He (high m/z) and coaxially-arranged one. The axial Faraday can be inserted on the main axial beam line in front of the SEM when an intense ion beam is required to be detected.
The split-type flight tube also can reduce background noise near the 3He spectrum caused by the scattering of 4He ions inside the flight tube. Additional advantages for the double collection system are: 1) easy and stable operation for measuring two ion beams of largely different intensities by use of suitable ion detection methods; and 2) easier setting of the main electromagnetic field intensity which should be stable most of the time when ion beams are being measured. When a mass spectrometer is equipped with a single-collector system, the isotope ratio is measured with a peak-jumping mode, in which each isotope peak and baselines are measured by changing the main magnet field intensity corresponding to each m/z. Such peak jumping thus requires repeated changes in the magnetic field during an isotope ratio analysis, making precise and stable control of the magnetic field difficult. In contrast, a double collector system is capable of reducing magnetic field jumping, since only two magnetic field settings (one for He peak center and the other for baseline) are required.
Ultra high vacuum pumping system for He-MS is composed of a turbo-molecular pump (150 L/s), an ion pump (20 L/s) and a rotary pump. The whole He-MS can be heated to ca. 300°C in a baking box, because the components are made of metal (SUS304, copper and gold) and ceramics. After a baking operation at 250–280°C for a few days, a vacuum of <3×10−8 Pa can be attained. Two getter pumps (NP-10: SAES Getters Co.) placed in the flight tube effectively reduce H2 background. After achieving ultra high vacuum conditions, an ion pump is used to maintain the vacuum instead of a turbo-molecular pump.
Noble gas preparation line
He-MS is equipped with a noble gas preparation line similar to those described in Nagao et al.15) and Sumino et al.,16) in which noble gases are purified by chemically removing reactive gases with titanium–zirconium getters heated at about 800°C, He and Ne are then separated from Ar, Kr and Xe by adsorbing the latter on charcoal traps cooled at liquid nitrogen temperature, and finally the He is separated from Ne by adsorbing the Ne on a sintered stainless steel trap (Cryogenic trap) cooled at about 20 K. The purified He in the line is introduced into He-MS for determining the 3He/4He ratio and the amount of 4He. Next, Ne is desorbed from the Cryogenic trap at approximately 50 K, and then introduced into He-MS for measuring amount of 20Ne. Standard gases such as known amounts of the atmosphere and the 3He/4He standard gas with 3He/4He=(28.88±0.14)×10−6 (HESJ)17) stored in reservoirs are used for tuning the ion source, the collector system and the alignment of the flight tube, or can be used to evaluate the performance of He-MS. When an unknown gas sample is analyzed, a small amount of gas (∼1 cm3 STP) is separated from a sampling bottle (30–100 cm3) using a gas pipette with a known volume (∼2 cm3) and its pressure and temperature are measured, and the sample is then introduced into the preparation line. Most of the preparation line is also composed of stainless-steel and thus can be baked at 250°C to maintain ultrahigh vacuum conditions.
Controller for the ion source
The Nier-type ion source is composed of an ionization chamber, a filament, two electrodes to repel produced-ions from the chamber (repellers), an electrode to collect the current of the electron beam from the filament (trap), an electrode to push out the produced-electron from the filament toward an entrance slit of the chamber (grid), two lenses to draw out ions from the chamber and focus the ion-beam (half plate), and an ion exit slit at the ground potential (earth slit). A magnetic field is applied to the ion source by a pair of permanent magnets placed on the outside of the ion source housing, to improve ionization efficiency by collimating the electron beam. The controller of the ion source is basically composed of six circuits: 1) A constant current supply to the filament; 2) A voltage setting circuit to apply suitable voltages to each electrode; 3) Circuits to detect and control the electric current through the trap (hereafter trap current) to the desired values (400 μA for the usual operation); 4) A resistive divider to apply an electric potential, which is adjustable between the potentials of the chamber and the earth slit (ground), to the half plates. A high voltage of 3.5 kV from HER-5N6 power supply (Matsusada Precision Inc.) is applied to the chamber to accelerate the ions that are produced in the chamber. Each voltage relative to that for the chamber is adjustable within the ranges from −50 to −90 V for the filament, from −24 to +24 V for the repellers, and from +0 to +50 V for the trap. The grid voltage is adjustable from 0 to −24 V relative to the filament voltage. The stability of the each voltage is better than ±0.1% relative to the adjusted one within a temperature range of ±2°C.
Computer-controlled DC current supply for the main magnet
The DC current supply for the main electromagnet consists of a Hall probe (BHT-910: F.W. BELL) inserted between the pole pieces of the main magnet and a constant DC current supply (NL035-30: Takasago Ltd.) controlled by a GP-IB programmer (AP-1628A: Takasago Ltd.). The Hall probe has a gain of 0.75 mV/kG under a control current of 100.00 mA. The Hall-voltage is further amplified by an instrumental-amplifier with a gain of 130. The constant DC current supply applies electric current to the magnet under the control of a reference voltage produced by GP-IB programmer with a resolution of 16 bits. By using an electrical circuit and the computer program written in HP-Basic on a Microsoft Windows PC, which is based on the programs reported by Nagao et al.15) and Sumino et al.,16) an excitation current for the main magnet can be set and maintained at a given value by the program to obtain a mass spectrum by scanning the magnetic field.
Voltage supply for the Q-lens
Based on the ion optics calculation, the required voltages for the Q-lens are about ±25 V when the ion acceleration voltage is 3.5 kV. To compensate for a possible slight disagreement between the calculated ion optics and actual ion-orbit, the power supply can adjust voltages of the four electrodes of the Q-lens independently by changing connections among segmented resistances using rotary switches. Two DC power supplies (PL-120-0.6: Matsusada Precision Inc.) provide source positive and negative voltages.
Collector assemblage for ion detection
A schematic diagram of the measuring instruments assemblage for ion detection is shown in Fig. 5. A weak ion current of 3He is measured using an ion counting system composed of a secondary electron multiplier (ETP AF133H: SGE Analytical Science) and a pulse counting unit composed of amplifier, discriminator, and counter (ORTEC Co.). The counting rate of ions output from the counter (ORTEC 996) is acquired by a computer via GP-IB, and then converted to “imaginal” voltage for convenience by the following formula,
Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of ion detectors and signal processing. Output signals of high and axial Faraday and ion counting are acquired by a computer through a GP-IB interface.
where e is an elementary charge (1.6×10−19 C), N counting rate (cps), and R imaginal electric register (1×1015 Ω).
The intense 4He beam is collected in the Faraday cup and measured as a current mode by converting to voltage through an operational amplifier (OPA104CM: Burr-Brown Co.) with a 1.0×1010 Ω feedback register (RHA2B: Hydragin Co.). The output voltage is measured using a digital multimeter (HP 34401: Agilent Technologies) and read by the computer via GP-IB. Data acquisition is carried out using the HP-Basic program reported by Nagao et al.15) and Sumino et al.16) A pair of electrodes (deflectors in Figs. 4 and 5) is installed in front of the collector slit for 4He, which functions as a zoom lens as well as a deflector of the 4He ion beam to focus the ion beam at the collector slit and to produce a flat top mass spectrum.
Results and Evaluation of the He-MS
Mass resolution, sensitivity, and detection limit
The basic specification of He-MS are summarized in Table 1, and the current instrument is compared with the miniature and conventional mass spectrometers for noble gas measurements developed by Sano et al.12) and the Modified-VG5400 installed at the University of Tokyo. Vacuum conditions, 5% valleys of the mass resolutions, sensitivities for 4He, background peak heights of HD, detection limits for 3He, and dynamic ranges of He detection, respectively, are listed. The mass resolution power is 430 for a 5% peak height (upper panel in Fig. 6), which is lower than the simulated value of 700 (Fig. 3). The low value may be due to inaccurate alignment of the source and collector slits as well as the flight tube, and the vertical length of ion beam emitted from the earth slit (5 mm×0.1 mm) of the ion source which is larger than that assumed in the simulation (2 mm×0.1 mm), resulting in the scattering of ions and broadening of the observed 3He peak. Considering only sensitivity, the estimated detection limit for He ions corresponds to <10−15 cm3 STP of He in the MS. However, the tailing effect of HD due to the relatively low mass resolution power and background noise due to scattered 4He ions both of which interfere with the 3He signal, would make the practical detection limit worse.
Table 1. Basic specification of the He-MS instrument and other noble gas mass spectrometers.
| Vacuum | Mass resolution | Sensitivity | Background HD† | Detection limit | Dynamic range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pa | 5% valley | cm3 STP/cps | cm3 STP | cm3 STP 3He | ||
| This study | 2.7×10−8 | 430 | 3.0×10−14* | 1.5×10−12 | 1×10−13 | 4×107 |
| Sano et al.12) | 4.0×10−8 | 600 | 1.6×10−15** | 1.3×10−11 | 1×10−12‡ | <1×107 |
| MS-III# | 1.3×10−8 | 550 | 6.4×10−15 | 3.6×10−13 | 1×10−15 | 1×109 |
# Modified-VG5400 installed at the University of Tokyo. * 4He at ion counting mode. ** Converted 1.6×10−19 A to 1 cps. † HD ion current is converted to cm3 STP by comparing with 3He ion current and sensitivity. ‡ Estimated from S/N ratio of mass spectra.
Fig. 6. Mass spectra of 3He+ and HD+ (+H3+). The upper panel is the spectrum when 3He of the standard He gas (HESJ)17) is introduced into He-MS, and lower one is the background spectrum when the MS is operated in a static mode, i.e., isolated from the pumping system.
As can be seen in the background mass spectra around 3He+ in Fig. 6 (lower panel), a residual signal which would be a tailing of the HD+ spectrum is still observed at the position of 3He+ even in evacuated conditions. The mean sensitivity for 4He by the ion counting mode determined by seven measurements of the standard air is (3.0±0.1)×10−14 cm3 STP/cps (Table 1). Although the background signals of HD and H3 are small and equivalent to 1.5×10−12 cm3 STP of 3He (Table 1), its tailing seems to appear at the center of the 3He peak. The tailing effect at m/z=3.0160 (corresponding to 3He center) can be virtually converted to an amount of 3He of 1.6×10−14 cm3 STP.
The scattering of 4He ions also affects the baseline at the 3He spectrum. Figure 7 shows the correlation between the baseline signal intensity adjacent to 3He and the amount of 4He in the MS. The good linear correlation suggests the presence of interfering ions equivalent to 1 cps per 6.4×10−7 cm3 STP 4He in the MS. If the interfering ions are equally detected at both the peak and baseline of 3He, they would not seriously affect 3He detection by a baseline correction. However, in the case of low counting rates for 3He ions, statistical variations in the counting rates for both 3He and the baseline would strongly affect the determination of the 3He peak intensity, occasionally resulting in a negative apparent 3He output. Given that the introduced 4He is 10−6 cm3 STP, the noise from the scattered ion would correspond to 4.3×10−14 cm3 STP 3He on the positions of the 3He peak and the baseline. Based on the counting rate and the integration time for the 3He count accumulation in practical measurements, the statistical variation in this noise is estimated to be 1.3×10−14 cm3 STP 3He equivalent.
Fig. 7. Correlation between signals at m/z=2.895, assumed to be baseline signal for 3He in the routine isotopic measurement, and amount of 4He introduced into He-MS. A good linear correlation shows that scattered 4He ion is detected at the baseline, resulting in an increased signal at baseline for 3He.
Therefore the overall detection limit for 3He is estimated to be 10−13 cm3 STP (Table 1) defined as a signal-to-noise ratio of ∼3 with the noise as the sum of those derived from noise level of the detector (corresponding to <10−15 cm3 STP), scattering effect of 4He+ (1.3×10−14 cm3 STP), and the tailing of HD (1.6×10−14 cm3 STP). The detection limit is much better than that of the in-house fabricated MS (10−12 cm3 STP),12) and comparable to those of commercially available instruments, ranging from 3×10−14 (Sano and Wakita)18) to 6×10−16 (Sumino et al.)16) cm3 STP. Although the remaining problems posed above make the performance of He-MS worse to some extent, a slight difference in the He isotopic ratio in natural samples can still be measured, as shown below.
Reproducibility in He isotopic ratio measurements of the He standard gas (HESJ)
Reproducibility of He isotope measurements is the most important factor for a long-period and continuous monitoring of 3He/4He in natural samples. To investigate the reproducibility of the 3He/4He ratio measurements with He-MS, we measured the He standard gas, HESJ with a 3He/4He ratio of (28.88±0.14)×10−6 (Matsuda et al.),17) a total of 35 times using nearly constant amount of He (4He ∼1.1×10−6 cm3 STP). Results of the replicate measurements of 3He/4He ratios are shown in Fig. 8, for which different sensitivities between the ion counting and the Faraday cup used for the 3He and 4He measurements, respectively, are uncorrected. Since HESJ has a high 3He/4He ratio, 20 times higher than that of terrestrial air: (1.399±0.013)×10−6 (Mamyrin et al.),19) and is composed of almost pure He, an isotope measurement is relatively easy, since the He purification is not necessary and the effect of interfering ions such as the HD on 3He is smaller than in the case of natural samples with lower 3He/4He (<10×10−6).
Fig. 8. Result of replicate measurements of HESJ. Open and solid symbols are obtained using different ion source conditions before and after the replacement of a filament in the ion source. Error bars are one standard deviation of repeated data acquisitions for each sample analysis.
An average of measured 3He/4He ratios is 1.734±0.062 (2σ) in the first period (24 November 2007–5 January 2008) and 1.770±0.050 (2σ) in the second period (13 October 2008–30 November 2008). Between the two periods, the filament of the ion source was replaced and the conditions for the ion source were changed slightly. The 3He/4He stability was 3–4% for more than a month, which is sufficient to permit the detection of changes in the 3He/4He ratio during the continuous monitoring of natural He. For example, changes in He isotopic ratio reported for seismic/volcanic activities are more than 10% (Bräuer et al.)4) or a factor of two or more (Sano et al.)3,6) compared to those observed during periods of steady-state. He-MS therefore has the capabilities for distinguishing between such isotopic changes in nature.
Measurements of natural gas samples
In case of analyses of gas samples in nature, the procedure for measuring He differs from that for HESJ. Volcanic, spring and natural gases are mainly treated as samples in noble gas geochemistry. In the natural samples, noble gases are trace components, and thus most of the sample gases, e.g., carbon dioxide, nitrogen, oxygen, methane etc., must be removed by a purification procedure before a noble gas analysis can be performed. We measured two natural gases, four volcanic gases, six hot-spring gases, and one soil gas (Table 2), which were collected in 50 cm3 lead-glass bottles with two vacuum stopcocks on both ends. The amounts of the natural gases introduced into the purification line were limited to <1 cm3 STP because of the capacity of the purification system. The introduced noble gases were purified and the He and Ne were separated from other noble gases and then analyzed following the procedure described above.
Table 2. Helium isotope ratios, 4He and 20Ne concentrations of gas samples measured by He-MS and other mass spectrometers.
| Sample | Total gas volume | C(4He) | 3He/4He | C(20Ne) | 4He/20Ne | 3He/4He | 4He/20Ne | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cm3 STP | ppm | 10−6 | ppm | 10−6 | ||||
| He-MS | MS-III or MS-IV | |||||||
| Methane rich continental gas | 0.279 | 278 | 0.084±0.013 | 0.0706 | 3930 | 0.1006±0.0037 | 5780 | 1 |
| 0.247 | 163 | 0.025±0.015 | 0.122 | 1340 | 0.0170±0.0022 | 1040 | ||
| Volcanic gas in Galápagos | 0.314 | 4.36 | 17.25±0.31 | 3.97 | 1.10 | 17.79±0.20 | 1.56 | 2 |
| 0.700 | 12.6 | 24.14±0.46 | 0.0054 | 2320 | 25.03±0.35 | 2360 | ||
| Volcanic gas in China | 0.700 | 2.31 | 7.59±0.14 | 0.0249 | 92.7 | 7.501±0.053 | 82.1 | |
| 0.505 | 10.9 | 8.17±0.15 | 0.0485 | 224 | 8.573±0.061 | 162 | ||
| Hot-spring gas in China | 0.719 | 167 | 3.27±0.10 | 14.1 | 11.8 | 3.498±0.056 | 11.1 | |
| Hot-spring gas in Japan | 1.190 | 12.2 | 9.12±0.15 | 1.33 | 9.18 | 9.067±0.080 | 11.0 | |
| Carbonate-rich hot spring gas | 0.667 | 5580 | 0.880±0.041 | 12.6 | 442 | 0.854±0.014 | 541 | |
| 0.085 | 6560 | 0.685±0.057 | 10.8 | 609 | 0.698±0.030 | 856 | ||
| Carbonate-rich hot spring gas | 0.783 | 93.2 | 7.10±0.30 | 0.483 | 193 | 7.140±0.080 | 588 | |
| 0.958 | 1.19 | 3.01±0.11 | 0.0077 | 154 | 2.890±0.030 | 181 | ||
| Soil gas in Canary Islands | 0.707 | 6.59 | 1.45±0.09 | 21.0 | 0.31 | 1.610±0.064 | 0.281 | 3 |
| 4He | 3He/4He | 20Ne | ||||||
| 10−10 cm3 STP | 10−6 | 10−10 cm3 STP | ||||||
| Blank | 2.6 | 60±41 | 5.7 | |||||
Results for the natural samples are summarized in Table 2 with data measured by two modified-VG5400 (MS-III and MS-IV) noble gas MS instruments for comparison. Details of the analysis of noble gas samples using MS-III and MS-IV have been described by Aka et al.20) and Sumino et al.,21) respectively. Table 2 also shows the procedural blank levels which are sufficiently low compared to the amounts of He and Ne from the samples introduced into He-MS. As shown in Fig. 9, 3He/4He ratios measured using He-MS are in good agreement with those obtained by MS-III and -IV over a 3He/4He ratio range from 10−5 to 10−8. Because the amounts of He introduced into He-MS were adjusted to be almost constant (corresponding to ∼3×10−8 Torr) to maintain the ion source conditions nearly constant, the amount of 3He in the MS decreased with decreasing 3He/4He ratio and, as a result, it was difficult to precisely determine the ratio. Figure 10 compares 4He/20Ne ratios measured by He-MS with those by MS-III/IV. They show good agreement in general, and when differ to an extent beyond their analytical errors, the discrepancy is acceptable unless the 4He/20Ne ratio of a sample is close to the atmospheric value (0.32), because it is used as an index of atmospheric contamination.
Fig. 9. Comparison of 3He/4He ratios obtained with He-MS and those with MS-III or MS-IV. The solid line indicates 1 : 1 correlation. Error bars are 1σ.
Fig. 10. Comparison of 4He/20Ne ratios obtained with He-MS and those with MS-III or MS-IV. The solid line indicates 1 : 1 correlation. Error bars are 1σ.
Measurements of the atmospheric He
In order to measure He (5.2 ppm) in the atmosphere, the more abundant Ar (0.9%) and Ne (18 ppm) need to be separated from the He fraction. Moreover, since the 3He/4He ratio of the atmospheric He is 1.4×10−6, consequently the volume fraction of 3He in the atmosphere is 7.3 ppt, measurement of the He isotopic ratio requires a high sensitivity for 3He detection and a technique for isolating He from Ne. It is possible to isolate He from other noble gas species using cold traps inserted in the purification line, and He-MS has a high sensitivity for 3He and mass resolving power which can distinguish HD+ and H3+ from 3He+. The results of repeated measurements of atmospheric He are shown in Fig. 11. The correction factor for raw 3He/4He ratios, involving the sensitivity ratio between ion counting and Faraday cup collectors used for 3He and 4He, respectively, and the mass discriminating effect of the MS, was calculated as a ratio of the measured and absolute 3He/4He ratio of HESJ.17) Measured 3He/4He ratios using various amounts of He, (0.31–2.3)×10−6 cm3 STP 4He, introduced into He-MS are plotted in Fig. 11. The observed atmospheric 3He/4He ratios are identical to the reference value of (1.399±0.013)×10−6 (Mamyrin et al.)19) within analytical errors.
Fig. 11. 3He/4He ratios of atmospheric He as a function of the amount of He introduced into He-MS. The amounts of He correspond to 0.06−0.44 cm3 STP of atmosphere. The broken line and hatched area show the average and standard deviation of the measured 3He/4He ratios. Error bars are 1σ.
Helium Extraction System and Its Application
A helium extraction system was developed for practical application to routine measurements of natural gas/water samples based on exploiting the high permeability of He through a silica glass tube. As a result, it can simplify the procedure for purifying He in the gas phase compared with the conventional method described above. The continuous He sampling method from a gas–water mixture is schematically presented in Fig. 12. The gas–water separator module22) contains a bunch of silicone hollow tubes, and the insides of the tubes are isolated from the outsides. The module selectively extracts and isolates the gas phase from water running through the insides of the silicone hollow tubes, by decompression of the outside volume of the tubes using a diaphragm pump. Gases from the exchange module are introduced into the outside volume of the heated silica tube, and nearly pure He passes through the silica glass wall, and it can then finally be introduced into He-MS. When the inner volume of the silica tube is under a vacuum, the pressure difference for He between the outer and inner volumes of the tube enables He to penetrate through the silica glass into the inner volume connected to the He analysis system. Because the permeability of He through silica glass is still as low as 10−10 cm3 STP/s/cm2(area)/mm(thickness)/Torr(pressure difference) at room temperature,23) the silica tube needs to be heated to attain high permeability to collect a sufficient amount of He into the inner volume for the isotopic measurement. It is known that the permeability of He increases exponentially with an increase in the temperature of the silica glass. The much lower permeability of other gases than He permits the measurement of He without the need for the purification/separation procedure described above. For example, at 700°C, the permeability of hydrogen, Ne, Ar and nitrogen are respectively 15, 76, >1×107, and >1×107 times smaller than that of He.23,24)
Fig. 12. Schematic drawing of a system for extracting He from water. Gas species in water running through silicone hollow tubes permeate into the outside of the tubes and transferred to the outer volume of the silica tube by the diaphragm pump. The diaphragm pump maintains gas pressure outside the silicone hollow tubes low, keeping continuous gas extraction from the water. The silica tube can be heated up to 700°C by a sheath heater. When the gas–water separator module is removed and a gas sample is directly introduced into the outer volume of the silica tube, the system can selectively introduce He into He-MS from the gas sample through the silica tube.
By using this extraction system, the time required for the He isotope measurement can be greatly reduced due to time savings associated with the purification and separation of He, resulting in a high time resolution and simple procedure for an automated continuous monitoring system to be constructed in the future. Tentative data are summarized in Fig. 13. In this study, the data were obtained from air in the laboratory without the gas–water separator module and diaphragm pump. Type 1 silica tubes consist of silica tube connected to a ConFlat flange with an O-ring made of Viton. On the other hand, type 2 silica tubing, as shown in Fig. 12, is connected to the metal flange with a Kovar seal instead of a Viton O-ring.
Fig. 13. Plot of 3He/4He vs. 4He/20Ne obtained by using the silica-tube extraction system. Filled circle represents the data with the type 1 tube and open-square with the type 2. In the type 1, silica tube is connected to a metal flange with a Viton O-ring. On the other hand, silica tube is connected to a metal flange through a glass–metal joint (Kovar seal) in the type 2. Two dotted lines in the figure are mixing lines represent addition of commercially available He to the mixture of atmospheric He and Ne permeated through the two types of silica tubes. For the commercial He 3He/4He ratio of 10−8 is assumed. Note that 4He/20Ne ratios of all samples shifted to higher values due to the higher permeability of He than that of Ne in silica tube. Permeability ratios of 4He to 20Ne (4He/20Ne) through silica tubes of type 1 and 2 are estimated as 63 and 130 based on the lowest 4He/20Ne ratios.
The low 4He/20Ne ratios, ∼25, observed for Type 1 tubing compared with those for Type 2 tubing may be attributed to the infiltration of atmospheric Ne through the Viton O-ring. The infiltration of Ne is reduced when Type 2 tubing is used as inferred from the higher 4He/20Ne ratios, >50. In addition to the different 4He/20Ne ratios among the two different types of silica tubes, the decreased 3He/4He ratios down to 0.45×10−6 accompanied by an increase in 4He/20Ne ratios up to 200 were observed in both cases, as shown in Fig. 13. When these data were observed, the amounts of He infiltrated through the silica glass increased.
This can be explained as an increase of He with low 3He/4He in the laboratory air, because on one occasion we checked the vacuum leakage of the purification line before the silica tube experiment using a commercially available sample of He stored in a metal cylinder. The commercially available He was mainly collected in well gas field in the old continental area,10) and thus was enriched in 4He produced from α-decay of U and Th and accumulated during gas storage in the crust over the geological timescale. Since such He is frequently used in laboratory experiments, the observed He increase in the laboratory atmosphere could be due to the release and/or leakage of He from other laboratories in our building. If this is the case, we eventually demonstrated the ability of He-MS for the continuous monitoring of 3He/4He and/or 4He/20Ne variations in nature.
The 4He/20Ne ratio in air is 0.32 and the observed lowest value is 43 when type 2 tubing was used, thus the transmission factor for He/Ne ratio through the silica tube at ca. 700°C in this system becomes 130. The value generally agrees with 76, measured at a temperature range of 25−500°C by Altemose23) and Norton24) if we consider the uncertainty associated with the extrapolation up to 700°C.
Conclusion
We designed and constructed a new mass spectrometer, He-MS, for the continuous monitoring of He isotopic ratios in naturally occurring gases and waters. Although the mass resolution still remains insufficient, He-MS performed satisfactorily in the measurement of small-amounts of He in natural gas samples under the present conditions. Detection limits for 3He as low as 10−13 cm3 STP were achieved by improving the quality of the vacuum in the MS. An acceptable reproducibility of 5% or less for 3He/4He measurements was demonstrated by the repeated isotopic ratio measurements of a standard He sample. The dynamic range in 3He/4He ratio measurement was determined to be >1,000 by measuring different types of natural gas samples. There is no systematic difference in exceeding the analytical errors between the 3He/4He ratios obtained with He-MS and those by the VG5400 mass spectrometers in our laboratory.
An extraction system composed of a gas–water separation module and hot silica tubes was designed to extract He dissolved in water. The hot silica-tube showed high selectivity for He extraction from gas samples compared with other noble gases and reactive gas species. Since this He extraction system is maintenance-free and does not require a cryogen for separating He from other gas species, it will be very useful in the continuous monitoring of 3He/4He ratio at a field observation station.
Acknowledgments
Authors are greatly indebted to the late Professor Hisashi Matsuda for his guidance regarding mass spectrometry and continuous encouragement during our research work. He-MS was manufactured by the Horiguchi Iron Works (Kobe, Japan). This work was partly supported by the science foundation of JEOL Ltd. and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan under its Research Program for Prediction of Earthquakes.
References
- 1) B. A. Mamyrin, I. N. Tolstikhin. Helium Isotopes in Nature. Elsevier, 1984, pp. 273
- 2) M. Ozima, F. A. Podosek. Noble Gas Geochemistry (2nd Ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, pp. 286
- 3) Y. Sano, N. Takahata, G. Igarashi, N. Koizumi, N. C. Sturchio. Helium degassing related to the Kobe earthquake. Chem. Geol. 150: 171–179, 1998 [Google Scholar]
- 4) K. Bräuer, H. Kämpf, U. Koch, S. Niedermann, G. Strauch. Seismically induced changes of the fluid signature detected by a multi-isotope approach (He, CO2, CH4, N2) at the Wettinquelle, Bad Brambach (central Europe). J. Geophys. Res. 112(B4): B04307, 2007 [Google Scholar]
- 5) K. Horiguchi, J. Matsuda. On the change of 3He/4He ratios in hot spring gases after the Iwate–Miyagi Nairiku earthquake in 2008. Geochem. J. 42: e1–e4, 2008 [Google Scholar]
- 6) Y. Sano, T. Gamo, K. Notsu, H. Wakita. Secular variations of carbon and helium isotopes at Izu-Oshima volcano, Japan. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 64: 83–94, 1995 [Google Scholar]
- 7) H. Wakita, Y. Nakamura, K. Notsu, M. Noguchi, T. Asada. Radon anomaly: A possible precursor of the 1978 Izu-Oshima-kinkai earthquake. Science 207: 882–883, 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8) K. Mogi. Recent earthquake prediction research in Japan. Science 233: 324–330, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9) G. Igarashi, S. Saeki, N. Takahata, K. Sumikawa, S. Tasaka, Y. Sasaki, M. Takahashi, Y. Sano. Ground-water radon anomaly before the Kobe earthquake in Japan. Science 269: 60–61, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10) M. J. Kotarba, K. Nagao. Composition and origin of gaseous hydrocarbons, noble gases, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen from natural gases accumulated in the Polish and Ukrainian parts of the Carpathian region. Chem. Geol. 255: 426–438, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 11) Z. Wu, H. Matsuda. A single focusing mass spectrometer with large incident and exit angles. Mass Spectr. 30: 129–135, 1982, in Japanese with English abstract. [Google Scholar]
- 12) Y. Sano, H. Wakita, K. Wakino, M. Murata, H. Yamamoto, H. Matsuda. Helium isotope ratio measurement by a single focusing mass spectrometer with large incident and exit angles. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process 91: 69–77, 1989 [Google Scholar]
- 13) T. Matsuo, H. Matsuda, Y. Fujita, H. Wollnik. Computer program “TRIO” for third order calculation of ion trajectory. Mass Spectr. 24: 19–62, 1976, in Japanese with English abstract. [Google Scholar]
- 14) M. Toyoda, T. Matsuo. Computer program “TRIO-DRAW” for displaying ion trajectory and flight time. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 427: 375–381, 1999 [Google Scholar]
- 15) K. Nagao, A. Ogata, Y. N. Miura, K. Yamaguchi. Ar isotope analysis for K–Ar dating using two modified-VG5400 mass spectrometers – I: Isotope dilution method. J. Mass Spectrom. Soc. Jpn. 44: 39–61, 1996 [Google Scholar]
- 16) H. Sumino, K. Nagao, K. Notsu. Highly sensitive and precise measurement of helium isotopes using a mass spectrometer with double collector system. J. Mass Spectrom. Soc. Jpn. 49: 61–68, 2001 [Google Scholar]
- 17) J. Matsuda, T. Matsumoto, H. Sumino, K. Nagao, J. Yamamoto, Y. N. Miura, I. Kaneoka, N. Takahata, Y. Sano. The 3He/4He ratio of the new internal He standard of Japan (HESJ). Geochem. J. 36: 191–195, 2002 [Google Scholar]
- 18) Y. Sano, H. Wakita. Precise measurement of helium isotopes in terrestrial gases. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 61: 1153–1157, 1988 [Google Scholar]
- 19) B. A. Mamyrin, G. S. Anufriyev, I. L. Kamenskii, I. N. Tolstikhin. Determination of the isotopic composition of atmospheric helium. Geochem. Int. 7: 498–505, 1970 [Google Scholar]
- 20) F. T. Aka, M. Kusakabe, K. Nagao, G. Tanyileke. Noble gas isotopic compositions and water/gas chemistry of soda springs from the islands of Bioko, São Tomé and Annobon, along with Cameroon Volcanic Line, West Africa. Appl. Geochem. 16: 323–338, 2001 [Google Scholar]
- 21) H. Sumino, K. Notsu, S. Nakai, M. Sato, K. Nagao, M. Hosoe, H. Wakita. Noble gas and carbon isotopes of fumarolic gas from Iwojima volcano, Izu-Ogasawara arc, Japan: Implications for the origin of unusual arc magmatism. Chem. Geol. 209: 153–173, 2004 [Google Scholar]
- 22) F. Tsunomori, K. Notsu. Simultaneous monitoring of gas concentration and groundwater level at the Omaezaki 500-m well, central Japan: Spike-like concentration change of methane level change. Geochem. J. 42: 85–91, 2008 [Google Scholar]
- 23) V. O. Altemose. Helium diffusion through glass. J. Appl. Phys. 32: 309–316, 1961 [Google Scholar]
- 24) F. J. Norton. Helium diffusion through glass. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 36: 90–96, 1953 [Google Scholar]
- 25) E. Padrón, P. A. Hernández, N. M. Pérez, T. Toulkeridis, G. Melián, J. Barrancos, G. Virgili, H. Sumino, K. Notsu. Fumarole/plume and diffuse CO2 emission from Sierra Negra caldera, Galapagos archipelago. Bull. Volcanol. 74: 1509–1519, 2012 [Google Scholar]
- 26) E. Padrón, N. M. Pérez, P. A. Hernández, H. Sumino, G. Melián, J. Barrancos, D. Nolasco, G. Padilla. Helium emission at Cumbre Vieja volcano, La Palma, Canary Islands. Chem. Geol. 312–313: 138–147, 2012 [Google Scholar]













