Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Sep 18;3:2693. doi: 10.1038/srep02693

MnO Nanoparticle@Mesoporous Carbon Composites Grown on Conducting Substrates Featuring High-performance Lithium-ion Battery, Supercapacitor and Sensor

Tianyu Wang 1, Zheng Peng 1, Yuhang Wang 1, Jing Tang 1, Gengfeng Zheng 1,a
PMCID: PMC3776197  PMID: 24045767

Abstract

We demonstrate a facile, two-step coating/calcination approach to grow a uniform MnO nanoparticle@mesoporous carbon (MnO@C) composite on conducting substrates, by direct coating of the Mn-oleate precursor solution without any conducting/binding reagents, and subsequent thermal calcination. The monodispersed, sub-10 nm MnO nanoparticles offer high theoretical energy storage capacities and catalytic properties, and the mesoporous carbon coating allows for enhanced electrolyte transport and charge transfer towards/from MnO surface. In addition, the direct growth and attachment of the MnO@C nanocomposite in the supporting conductive substrates provide much reduced contact resistances and efficient charge transfer. These excellent features allow the use of MnO@C nanocomposites as lithium-ion battery and supercapacitor electrodes for energy storage, with high reversible capacity at large current densities, as well as excellent cycling and mechanical stabilities. Moreover, this MnO@C nanocomposite has also demonstrated a high sensitivity for H2O2 detection, and also exhibited attractive potential for the tumor cell analysis.

Manganese oxides (MnOx) are a class of transition metal oxides, including MnO, MnO2, Mn3O4, Mn2O3, which are endowed with rich oxidation states and chemistry1,2,3. The electron transfer of MnOx structures, along with the fast development of versatile structures controlled during the growth, has offered substantial potentials in many application fields, including catalysis4, chemical/biological sensing5,6, and energy storage7,8. Manganese oxides are promising candidates for active electrode materials, due to their high specific capacitance, low cost, abundance and environmentally benign nature1. For instance, MnO2 and MnO have high theoretical capacities of ~1232 and 755 mAh g−1 as lithium-ion battery (LIB) anodes, respectively9. For supercapacitors, the nanostructured manganese oxides have presented great capacitance retention upon cycling10. Nonetheless, these performances are still limited due to, in general, the low electrical conductivity, low rate capability, and suboptimal structural stability of MnOx2,11. A variety of approaches, such as nanostructure fabrication10,11,12,13,14, chemical modification15,16, and incorporation with high surface-area, conductive materials17,18, have been explored to improve the performance of MnOx-based electrodes. For instance, Wang et al. reported a solution approach of growing Mn3O4 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide sheets, with a high specific capacity up to ~900 mAh g−1 as LIB anodes19. Mallouk and coworkers developed a template-free hydrothermal synthesis of graphene/Mn3O4 nanorod composites from KMnO4 and ethylene glycol, which showed an enhanced capacitance and long cycle stability over free Mn3O4 nanorods20. Jiang et al. reported a sol-gel method for the growth of MnOx nanoparticle/mesoporous carbon/MnOx hybrid nanowires, where a high specific capacitance of 266 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 was obtained21. In addition to the solution methods, the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method has also been used to deposit carbon coating on the surface of porous MnO microspheres, which are obtained by decomposing Mn precursors such as MnCO322. For biosensing, one well-known example is that MnO2 is good catalyst for decomposition of H2O2, which is an important intermediate or product of many biochemical reactions and has a well-established relationship with numerous biological processes23. The detection of H2O2 has been demonstrated previously with MnO2 nanoparticles24, which waives the need of electrode modification with enzymes. Recently, a sensitive detection of H2O2 was reported by a MnO2/graphene oxide nanocomposite, with a low detection limit of 0.8 μM25.

In spite of these research progresses, several main challenges still need to be addressed for optimizing the conductance and rate performance of MnOx-based electrodes. For the direct growth of conducting carbon nanostructures including carbon nanotubes and graphene by CVD, the requirement of high reaction temperatures precludes the use of a majority of substrates, especially flexible substrates. In addition, the loading density of MnOx@C composites with MnOx directly grown on conducting substrates is usually restricted, due to the ultrathin film of the MnOx backbones21. On the other hand, when the pre-formed MnOx@C nanostructures is coated on a current collector, it often needs adding auxiliary binders and/or conductive reagents, such as conducting polymer11 and acetylene black21, which takes additional fabrication steps and cost, as well as reduces the effective mass percentage of electroactive materials. Furthermore, the lack of nanoscale pores that can allow for efficient mass transport towards and from the active MnOx sites also limits their rate capability for energy storage, as well as sensitive molecular detection. Recently, an in situ method based on a free-radical polymerization in the presence of metal oxide precursors was reported to produce a cross-linked polymer network incorporated with Fe3O4 or MnO nanoparticles (NPs), which can be thermally converted into uniform NP@C nanocomposites for LIB application26. However, this approach is still constrained by the use of conducting polymer as a binder and structural directing agent, and the obtained reversible capacity of the MnO@C nanocomposite is still far from the theoretical values.

In this paper, we demonstrate a facile method for direct coating of MnO organic precursor solution onto substrates without conducting polymer binders, followed by thermal treatment to grow monodispersed, ~10 nm-diameter MnO NPs embedded in a mesoporous carbon matrix (Figure 1). This MnO@C nanocomposite allows for efficient charge transfer, in which the carbon matrix serves as the major pathways for enhanced charge transport from MnO NPs. In addition, the mesopores of the carbon matrix offer efficient mass transport for electrolyte solution and chemical species, while at the same time providing volume buffer for MnO NPs during lithiation/delithiation, thus leading to excellent rate capabilities and cycling stability of this MnO@C nanocomposite. Furthermore, this approach can be applied to a large variety of substrates, including flexible ones for potential applications in portable energy storage and sensing devices. As proofs-of-concept, LIB anodes made of this monodispersed MnO@C nanocomposite display excellent reversible capacities of over 800 and 520 mAh g−1 at current densities of 0.1 and 2 A g−1, respectively. Supercapacitors made of this MnO@C nanocomposite exhibit stable capacitances of 160 and 40 F g−1, at current densities of 1 and 40 A g−1, respectively, which also show excellent mechanical stability over repeated folding and stretching. Finally, this MnO@C nanocomposite demonstrates sensitive electrical response to H2O2 in buffer solutions, and has been applied to interrogate the H2O2 concentration in cellular assays for tumor cell analysis.

Figure 1. Schematic of preparation of Mn-oleate precursor, direct coating of precursor solution on a conducting substrate, and thermal calcination to directly grow MnO@C nanocomposite on the substrate surface.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Results

Synthesis and structural characterization

The MnO@C nanocomposite is synthesized by a modified method27, in which a Mn-oleate precursor solution is directly coated on a conducting substrate, followed by thermal calcination at 550°C in Ar (Methods). After the solution coating, the substrate surface is covered by a uniform layer of brown color waxy solid, which turns black after thermal treatment. This process can be applied to a large variety of substrates, including Ni foam, Ti foil, carbon fiber, silicon wafer, fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass, and so on (Figure S1), indicating the general availability of this two-step coating-conversion method. The film thickness resulted from a single coating is ~300 nm (Figure S2a), corresponding to a net mass per area of ~1.24 mg cm−2 (Figure S2b). Repeated coating of the Mn-oleate precursor solution on the substrate leads to an almost linear increase of the film mass with the coating times. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show that the substrate is covered with a film of multi-layered, hexagonally closed-packed spherical NP arrays, with a uniform size distribution of ~10 nm (Figure 2a, b). Random, short cracks are observed over the film surface between different NP domains, which may result from the volume contraction of the nanocomposite during thermal treatment. Nonetheless, most of the NPs are still closed packed and the majority of the film is continuous. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images exhibit that these monodispersed NPs are embedded in an amorphous carbon matrix, in which each NP is coated by the carbon layer without being aggregated with adjacent ones (Figure 2c). The average diameter of the NPs is 10 ± 2 nm. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images reveal that each NP is single crystalline with few observable structure defects (Figure 2d). Well-resolved lattice fringes are observed from these nearly spherical NPs, which correspond to d-spacing values of 0.25 and 0.22 nm, consistent with the (111) and (200) planes reported for single crystal MnO26. The select area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern shows a poly-crystalline diffraction pattern, due to the different orientation from various MnO NPs (Figure 2d, inset). The first three diffraction rings of the SAED pattern correspond to the (111), (200) and (220) lattice planes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a, b) SEM images of MnO@C nanocomposite on a Ni foam substrate. (c) TEM, (d) HRTEM images and (inset) SAED pattern of MnO@C nanocomposites. (e) XRD pattern of MnO@C nanocomposite on a Ni foam substrate. (f) N2 sorption isotherm and corresponding pore size distribution curve (inset) of MnO@C nanocomposite.

The structure and phase purity of this MnO@C nanocomposite grown on Ni foam is further characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), which displays well-resolved diffraction peaks at 34.9°, 40.5°, 58.7°, 70.2°, 73.8° (Figure 2e). These peaks are well indexed as the 111, 200, 220, 311, and 222 reflections of MnO (JCPDS Card no. 07-0230), in good accord with the HRTEM and SAED results. No additional peaks other than the Ni foam are observed (Figure S3), indicating the high purity of the obtained MnO NPs. The carbon coating is confirmed by the Raman spectra with two bands at 1578 and 1364 cm−1 (Figure S4), attributed to the G-band and D-band of carbon, indicating the existence of both sp2 and sp3 carbons, respectively. The amount of MnO in the nanocomposite is quantified as ~84.3%, measured by inductively coupled plasma (ICP). Furthermore, the N2 sorption isotherm of the MnO@C nanocomposite shows a typical type-IV curve and a distinct condensation step (Figure 2f), indicating the existence of mesopore structures28,29. The surface area (SBET) is calculated as 28 m2 g−1, which is comparable to MnO2 nanostructures produced under similar temperatures1. The pore size derived from the adsorption branch shows a relatively narrow distribution of 5–40 nm (Figure 2f, inset). The surface area and large pore size are beneficial for providing sufficient interface between the electroactive materials and the electrolyte.

Lithium-ion battery anode

The electrochemical storage capacity of the obtained MnO@C nanocomposites is first investigated for LIB anodes, where the precursor solution is directly coated on a Ni foam substrate before thermal treatment, without adding any conducting polymers or binders. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests are first carried out to characterize the electrochemical reaction (Figure 3a). In the reduction half cycle, the main cathodic peak close to 0.1 V is observed during the first cycle, corresponding to the reduction of Mn2+ to Mn0 and the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on the nanocomposite surface30. The reduction current peak shifts to 0.6 V since the second cycle, which is ascribed to the formation of Li2O and metallic Mn, presented as22: MnO + 2 Li → Mn0 + Li2O. In the oxidation half cycle, the main peak is exhibited at ~1.4 V, in good accord with the oxidation of Mn0 to Mn2+ and Mn3+ in previous reports9. Both the reduction and oxidation curves almost overlap with the subsequent ones since the second cycle, indicating excellent electrochemical reversibility of the MnO@C nanocomposite.

Figure 3. LIB measurement of MnO@C nanocomposite on Ni foam.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Cyclic voltammograms for the first 3 cycles. (b) Voltage profiles at a current density of 100 mA g−1 for the 1st, 2nd, 50th and 80th discharge/charge cycles. (c) Cycling performances of directly growth (red curve) and post-coating (black curve) of MnO@C nanocomposite on Ni foams. The Coulombic efficiency of the direct growth method is also displayed (green curve). (d) Capacity retention at different charge/discharge rates from 0.1–2 A g−1.

Galvanostatic measurements of discharge-charge cycles are further carried out in the MnO@C nanocomposite based on the half-cell configuration at a current density of 0.1 A g−1, where several representative cycles, including the 1st, 2nd, 50th, and 100th ones, are displayed (Figure 3b). The voltage drops rapidly to ~0.5 V in the first discharge cycle, followed by two voltage plateaus at 0.5 and 0.3 V. The discharge profile is shifted to 0.6 V since the second cycle. For the charging process, two small voltage plateaus at 1.2 and 2.0 V are observed for all the charging cycles, in good accord with the CV measurement. An ultrahigh capacity of 1542 mAh g−1 is recorded for the first discharge process, which decreases to 981 mAh g−1 at the first charge process, indicating an initial Coulombic efficiency of 64%. These initial capacities exceed the theoretical value of MnO, which can be ascribed to the decomposition of electrolyte to form the SEI layer and further lithium storage via interfacial charging at metal Li2O interface9,22. In addition, the MnO@C nanocomposite anode presents an excellent cycling performance (Figure 3c, red curve). The discharge capacity becomes much more stable since the second cycle, with the Coulombic efficiency of each cycle over 95%. After 80 cycles, the discharge capacity is well retained at ~800 mAh g−1, corresponding to ~82% of that of the second cycle. This result is comparable or better than the best reversible capacity reported previously for MnOx-based LIB anodes, such as MnO/C core-shell nanorods9 (~600 mAh g−1 at 200 mA g−1), porous carbon-coated MnO microspheres22 (~750 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1), and MnO@C nanocomposite made by copolymerization of poly(acrylonitrile) and Mn oxide precursor containing vinyl groups26 (~350 mAh g−1 at 0.2C).

To further demonstrate the advantage of direct growth on substrate, MnO@C nanocomposite grown as free-standing power form, but otherwise identical conditions, is coated on Ni foam substrates with binding and conducting additives, and tested as LIB anodes for comparison (Figure 3c, black curve). The galvanostatic measurements at same 0.1 A g−1 current density shows an initial discharge capacity of 981 mAh g−1, which rapidly drops to 395.6 mAh g−1 at the second cycle and is retained at ~177.6 mAh g−1 after 80 cycles, corresponding to a capacity retention of 45% compared to that of the second cycle. This comparison clearly indicates that the direct growth of MnO@C nanocomposite over the current collector substantially enhances the Li+ storage capacity as LIB anodes. Moreover, the cycling performance of the MnO@C nanocomposite anode is further interrogated, where each step consists of 5 discharge/charge cycles at different current densities in the range of 0.1–2 A g−1 (Figure 3d). The discharge capacities are retained at 900, 780, 700, 610 and 520 mAh g−1 at the current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 2 A g−1, respectively, with a Coulombic efficiency of almost 100% for each cycle. This much enhanced capacity especially at high current rates is contributed to the efficient ion transport through the mesopores in the carbon matrix towards the MnO NP surface, as well as rapid charge transfer to the Ni foam substrate. When the current density is reset to 0.1 A g−1, the capacity is recovered to 850 mAh g−1, suggesting excellent cycling performance and stability of the MnO@C nanocomposite.

Supercapacitor

In addition to LIB anodes, the potential of using the MnO@C nanocomposite directly grown on a conducting substrate as electrochemical capacitors is subsequently evaluated. The MnO@C nanocomposite grown on a Ni foam substrate is fabricated as the working electrode, with a Pt wire serving as the counter electrode. A Na2SO4 solution is used as the electrolyte, and a voltage range between 0 and 1 V is applied. The CV curves under different scanning rates, including 25, 100, and 250 mV s−1, show nearly rectangular feature (Figure 4a), indicating a close-to-ideal pseudocapacitive nature of the electrode. At a high scanning rate of 500 mV s−1, the CV curve presents some deviation of a rectangular shape, which can be ascribed to the inherent resistivity of the electrode31. The MnO@C nanocomposite exhibits a high specific capacitance of 120 F g−1 at a scan rate of 25 mV s−1, which decreases to 53 F g−1 at a high scan rate of 500 mV s−1.

Figure 4. Supercapacitor measurement of MnO@C nanocomposite on Ni foam.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Cyclic voltammograms at different scan rate of 25–500 mV s−1. (b) Charge-discharge curves at different current densities. (c) Specific capacitance dependence on the current density from 0.5–40 A g−1. (d) Repeated charge-discharge curves and (e) capacity retention of 2500 cycles at 1 A g−1. Inset: the charge-discharge curves of the 50th, 1000th and 2000th cycles. (f) Capacity retention during repeated folding with an angle of almost 180° for 70 times. Inset: optical photos of the folded and extended electrodes of MnO@C nanocomposite on Ni foam.

The electrochemical performance of the MnO@C nanocomposite is further evaluated by galvanostatic charge-discharge measurement carried out at different current densities. The charging and discharging curves of several representative current rates, 0.5, 1, 2, and 8 A g−1, are exhibited (Figure 4b). All these curves present a symmetrical feature between the charging and discharging branches, suggesting ideal pseudocapacitive nature of fast charge/discharge processes13. At 1 A g−1, a high specific capacitance of 160 F g−1 is obtained, comparable to most of the manganese oxide-based composite materials reported recently, such as MnO2/CNT32 (179 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1), MnO2/carbon microfiber/CNT33 (180 F g−1 at 10 mV s−1), MnO2/graphene oxide nanocomposites34 (111 F g−1 at 1 A g−1), and Mn3O4 nanorod/graphene20 (115 F g−1 at 1 A g−1). The rate capability is further examined by measuring the charge/discharge cycles at higher current densities (Figure 4c). The specific capacitance shows a decrease trend with the increase of current density, due to the diffusion-limited charge/discharge process as well as the electrode overpotential at high current densities35, while it still maintains good capacitance retention. The specific capacitances at 8 and 40 A g−1 are 101.6 and 41.2 F g−1, corresponding to 63.5% and 25.8% of the value obtained at 1 A g−1, suggesting attractive rate capabilities for potential high power applications. Our result is comparable or better than most of the manganese oxide-based composite materials reported in similar high current densities, such as MnO2 coaxially coated on aligned carbon nanofiber arrays36 (70 F g−1 at 15 A g−1), and Mn3O4 nanorod/graphene sheet composites20 (88 F g−1 at 10 A g−1). Another recent report of MnO2 NW/mesoporous carbon/MnO2 NPs21 presents a high specific capacitance of 150 F g−1 at 60 A g−1, while this approach requires separate growth and coating steps for each structural component. In comparison, our synthesis approach has only a single coating and calcination step, which is much more convenient and readily to scale up.

In addition to high specific capacitance, the cycle stability is further tested to demonstrate its potential for long-term use. The charge-discharge cycles of the MnO@C nanocomposite at a current density of 1 A g−1 exhibits repeated, almost identical triangular curve shapes (Figure 4d). The long-term stability is demonstrated by the specific capacitance as a functional of cycle numbers (Figure 4e). After 2500 cycles, the specific capacitance is retained at ~160 F g−1, corresponding to ~110% of its original value. The slight increase of capacitance is ascribed to the activation effect of electrochemical cycling, suggested by previous reports of other manganese oxide-based electrode materials14. This cycling performance is better than previous reports of MnO2-based composites, such as graphene oxide-MnO2 nanocrystals34, which show over 84% capacity retention after 1000 cycles. A main reason of the capacitance loss for manganese oxide-based supercapacitor is the dissolution of active materials into electrolyte solution during cycling37. However, in our experiment, the electrolyte remains transparent after the cycling test, indicating that the majority of the MnO is stable and not dissolved. Moreover, the mechanical stability of the MnO@C nanocomposite on Ni foam is demonstrated by measuring of electrochemical performance after repeated folding (Figure 4f). The specific capacitance is retained almost constant (>96%), even after being folded with an angle of almost 180° for 70 times. These results suggest that the direct growth of MnO@C nanocomposite on substrates present remarkable electrochemical and mechanical stability.

Sensor

The MnO@C nanocomposite, due to its open mesopores for fast transport of molecules and enhanced electron transfer through the carbon matrix towards substrates, offers not only high electrochemical energy storage capacities, but also can serve as a sensitive platform for detection of chemical or biological species that indicate specific cellular process38. H2O2 is one of the most important small molecule targets that are related to many cell functions25, and has been recently reported as a potential marker for tumor cells39. However, the direct measurement of H2O2 from cellular process by manganese oxide-based sensors has not been demonstrated.

In our experiment, the CV of the MnO@C nanocomposite grown on a Ti substrate is first measured, in the presence of 0.4 and 2 mM of H2O2 in a phosphate buffer solution, respectively (Figure 5a). Compared with the CV curve measured without H2O2, a substantial increase of the current density is observed, indicating the increase charge transfer upon the addition of H2O2. In order to optimize the signal-to-noise ratio of the subsequent time-dependent current measurement, the bias range is selected as 0.6–0.7 V, where the current baseline of MnO@C nanocomposite without H2O2 is close to zero and the current increase with the H2O2 addition is relatively large (Figure S5). The response of the MnO@C nanocomposite to H2O2 is then interrogated by the time-dependent current measurement, with successive injection of H2O2 at intervals under a bias of 0.65 V (Figure 5b). Upon each addition of 200 μM of H2O2, the MnO@C nanocomposite electrode responds quickly with a conductance increase, which reaches equilibrium within 5–10 s. The magnitude of current increase for the subsequent H2O2 injections is smaller than that for the first several H2O2 injections, suggesting the signal saturation at higher H2O2 concentrations. Interestingly, when the free-standing MnO@C nanocomposite is coated on a Ti substrate, a much less response to the same H2O2 injection is recorded, which also shows earlier saturation upon the successive addition of H2O2, suggesting the importance of direct growth/attachment of MnO@C nanocomposite on the conducting substrate. The conductance change with different H2O2 concentrations (2, 10, 20, 100, 200 and 1000 μM) and the corresponding calibration curves are exhibited in Figure S6 and 5c, respectively. A wide linear range of 2 μM–2.4 mM is obtained, with the lowest H2O2 concentration detected as ~2 μM. These values are comparable or superior to most of the enzymatic or non-enzymatic manganese oxide-based H2O2 sensors25.

Figure 5. Sensing and cellular measurement of MnO@C nanocomposite on Ti foil.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Cyclic voltammograms in (i) 0, (ii) 0.4, and (iii) 2 mM of H2O2 in PBS solution. (b) Current-versus-time plot with repeated addition of 200 μM of H2O2 for directly growth (red curve) and post-coating (black curve) of MnO@C nanocomposite on Ti foil. (c) Concentration dependence plot of current change at different H2O2 concentrations. Inset: linear fitting for concentration range of 2 μM–2.4 mM. (d) Cellular assay of H2O2 detection for 293T cells and HeLa cells. Three conditions are presented for each cell lines: buffer without PMA or catalase (grey bars), buffer with PMA only (red bars), and buffer with both PMA and catalase (blue bars).

The MnO@C nanocomposite is further used for electrochemical detection of H2O2 produced by living cells, including human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells (a normal cell line) and HeLa cells. A low concentration (1 μg ml−1) of phobol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) is added to the cell culture for a short period of time (30–60 s), which can induce H2O2 generation from tumor cells40, and then a small amount of the cell culture solution containing H2O2 is added to the electrochemical detection assay (Methods). For the 293T cells (~105 cells/mL), the MnO@C nanocomposite electrode does not show an observable amperometric response before and after the addition of PMA. Under otherwise identical conditions, a substantial larger signal is observed from the MnO@C nanocomposite electrode for HeLa cells (~105 cells/mL) incubated with PMA. Furthermore, the introduction of a catalase into the HeLa cell culture medium reduces the current change to the background level. As catalase is known to selectively decompose H2O239, this result indicates that the current increase of the MnO@C nanocomposite electrode is attributed to the formation of H2O2 by the cellular process. Moreover, the higher signal from HeLa cells suggests a more active cellular activity than that of the 293T normal cells, in good accord with previous reports39,41. These results suggest the potential use of the highly sensitive MnO@C nanocomposite electrode for detection of cellular functions.

Discussion

The direct growth method for the MnO@C nanocomposite provides a facile and efficient means of synthesizing mono-dispersed, ~10-nm-diameter MnO NPs embedded in mesoporous carbon coating, which is directly attached to the conducting substrate (current collector) for efficient charge transport. In addition, the loading amount can be conveniently controlled by repeated coating of the Mn-oleate precursor solution on the substrate, followed by a single calcination step to convert to the MnO@C nanocomposite. The excellent performances of the MnO@C nanocomposite as LIB anodes, supercapacitors, and chemical sensors are attributed to the following advantages. First, the mesopores in the carbon matrix facilitates fast transport of molecules and ions from the electrolyte solution to the MnO NP surface. Second, the monodispersed, ultra-small MnO NPs and the surrounding mesoporous carbon matrix provide a high surface area for electrochemical reactions, which can sufficiently utilize the active materials. Third, the carbon matrix offers an efficient charge transport pathway from the MnO NPs to the supporting substrate, where the direct growth of the MnO@C nanocomposite on the conducting substrate surface allows for low contact resistance and enhanced charge transfer. Finally, the carbon matrix coating prevents the MnO NPs from degradation, while at the same time, the mesopores also serve as structural buffers for the dramatic volume change during Li+ intercalation/extraction or mechanical deformation.

To confirm the enhanced charge transport by the carbon coating, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is carried out for the MnO@C nanocomposite directly grown on Ni foam and fabricated as LIB anodes (Figure 6a), compared to that of the coating of pre-synthesized MnO@C nanocomposite on identical Ni foam substrates. The Nyquist plots are recorded at a frequency range of 0.01 Hz–100 kHz at an amplitude of 10 mV. The MnO@C nanocomposite grown on Ni foam exhibits a much smaller diameter of the depressed semicircle, indicating a much more efficient charge transfer process at the electrode interface7,42,43. Based on an equivalent electrical circuit model for LIB44, the charge transfer resistance for the direct growth and the post-coating approach are ~123.3 and ~204.8 Ω, respectively. Similarly, for the MnO@C nanocomposite fabricated as supercapacitor electrodes, the direct growth method provides a much smaller diameter of the Nyquist plot than that of the conventional post coating method (Figure 6b). The equivalent circuit modeling45 yields the charge transfer resistances of ~1.2 and ~1.8 Ω, respectively. Moreover, when the MnO@C nanocomposite is calcined to remove the carbon matrix, the Nyquist plot shows a substantially increased diameter of the semicircle, corresponding to a charge transfer resistance of 709.5 Ω. This result suggests that the removal of the carbon coating leads to a much increased electrical impedance and a reduced charge transfer process.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Nyquist plots of MnO@C nanocomposites as LIB anodes, for the direct growth method (red curve) and the post-coating method (black curve). (b) Nyquist plots of MnO@C nanocomposites as supercapacitor anodes, for the direct growth method (red curve), the post-coating method (black curve), and after removal of carbon coating for the direct grown thin films (blue curve). Inset: close up of the high frequency region.

In summary, we have demonstrated a facile, two-step coating/calcination method to synthesize a MnO@C nanocomposite, by directly coating of the Mn-oleate precursor solution on arbitrary conducting substrates, such as Ni foam and Ti foil, followed by calcination to convert the organic precursor molecules into a matrix of MnO NPs and mesoporous carbon. The monodispersed, sub-10 nm-diameter MnO NPs serve as the main sites of the electrochemical reaction, and the carbon matrix provides an efficient charge transport pathway from MnO NPs to the underlying substrate. In addition, the mesopores inside the carbon matrix also lead to fast mass transport of molecules and ions towards the MnO NP surface, as well as the structural spacer for the volume change during the lithiation/delithiation or mechanical deformation. This MnO@C nanocomposite has exhibited excellent performance for electrochemical energy storage and sensing. The LIB anodes made of the MnO@C nanocomposite on Ni foam show a high reversible capacity of ~800 and ~520 mAh g−1, at 0.1 and 2 A g−1, respectively. The supercapacitor electrodes made of the MnO@C nanocomposite on Ni foam present an electrochemical capacitance of 160 and 41 F g−1, at 1 and 40 A g−1, respectively. The electrochemical sensors based on the MnO@C nanocomposite on Ti foil show a wide, linear response regime for H2O2, with detection limit as low as 2 μM. In addition, H2O2 produced by HeLa cells can be well detected, clearly distinguished from that obtained from normal cell lines. Moreover, this synthesis approach is facile and convenient, and can be applied for other transition metal oxide NP@mesoporous C nanocomposite on a variety of substrates, thus opening up substantial opportunities for many promising electrochemical applications.

Methods

Synthesis of MnO@C nanocomposites

The Mn-oleate precursor was prepared by a simple chemical reaction of MnCl2 and sodium oleate, modified from a previous report27. In brief, 0.80 g of MnCl2·6H2O (~2 mmol) and 2.44 g of sodium oleate (~4 mmol) were first dissolved in a mixture of H2O (6 mL), ethanol (8 mL) and hexane (14 mL), with continuous stirring at room temperature for 30 min. The color of the upper solution gradually changed to light brown. The resultant mixture was kept still and aged at 70°C in an oven for 4 h. Afterwards, the upper solution (organic phase) was collected, and washed with deionized (DI) water for several times to obtain the Mn-oleate/hexane solution. To prepare for the MnO@C nanocomposite, a conductive substrate (such as Ni foam or Ti foil) was dipped into the Mn-oleate/hexane solution for several seconds. After the solvent was evaporated at room temperature, the substrate was coated with a red-brown waxy solid. This step can be repeated for several times to increase the loading amount of the Mn-oleate precursor. The substrate was then heated to 550°C at 10°C min−1 under Ar atmosphere, and then kept for 2 h before cooling to room temperature.

The growth mechanism was proposed elsewhere27. In brief, the metal oleate, such as Mn(oleate)2, is formed first in the solution reaction, in which Mn is +2. The oleate ligands are thermally dissociated into CO2, thus remaining in MnO. In addition, the mesopores are formed during the formation/elimination of CO2 from the reactants.

The MnO percentage in the nanocomposite was determined by ICP, briefly described as follows: an as-made MnO@C nanocomposite sample was mixed with H2SO4 (1 M) to fully dissolve the MnO content, and the supernatant was collected and measured by ICP, which showed the concentration of Mn2+. In addition, no other metal ions were detected by ICP, suggesting the purity of our samples. The mass percentage of MnO was then calculated based on the measured Mn2+ concentration and the original sample mass.

Cell culture

Cells were cultured in 10 ml of DMEM (high glucose) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin GIBCOBRL (Grand Island, New York, USA), at 37°C in a humidified hood filled with 5% CO2. After reaching 80–90% confluence, the cells were adjusted in PBS for 2 h prior to the sensing experiment. For the cell number counting, the cells were lifted with trypsin-EDTA and then re-dispersed in DMEM (high glucose) medium. The cell number was counted using a hemocytometer.

Electrochemical measurement

The mass loadings of the actual samples for lithium-ion battery and supercapacitor tests were in the range of 1.6 ± 0.2 mg/cm2. For lithium-ion battery measurement, the MnO/C nanocomposite electrodes were galvanostatically cycled on a galvanostat over a voltage range of 3.0–0.01 V vs. Li+/Li. Cyclic voltamograms (CVs) were recorded on a potentiostat over a voltage range of 3.0–0.01 V vs. Li+/Li at a scan rate of 0.5 mV/s. In rate capability test, the lithiation and delithiation current densities were changed every five cycles, according to this sequence of values: 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000, and 100 mA g−1.

For supercapacitor measurement, the electrochemical measurements were conducted using a three-electrode mode in a 0.5 M Na2SO4 solution. The working electrodes were prepared by directly grow on MnO@C nanocomposites on a Ni foam (1.2 cm in diameter), followed by pressing the substrate onto another Ni foam with larger size (2 cm × 5 cm). The reference electrode and counter electrode were Ag/AgCl electrode and Pt wire, respectively. Typical CV curves were measured between 0.01 and 1 V.

For the H2O2 sensing, the MnO/C nanocomposite electrodes were galvanostatically cycled on a galvanostat over a voltage range of 3.0–0.01 V vs. an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. The time-dependent conductivity test was carried out in a 5 mL of PBS solution at a bias voltage of 0.6–0.7 V, with addition of different concentrations of H2O2 in PBS. For the cellular measurement, both HEK 293T cells and HeLa cells were incubated with 1 μg mL−1 PMA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 30 s. For the catalase inhibition, 1 mL of a catalase solution (350 unit mL−1) was added into the cell culture for 30 min, before the addition of PMA. The measurement of the MnO@C nanocomposite was carried out in the same solution as the cell culture medium. Then 100 μL of the cell culture was injected into the detection solution (5 mL) for the conductivity measurement.

Author Contributions

T.W. carried out all the experiments and wrote the paper. Z.P. helped in the supercapacitor measurement. Y.W. helped in the lithium-ion battery measurement. J.T. helped in the cell culture and sensing measurement. G.Z. supervised the research and revised the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep02693-s1.doc (1.2MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following funding agencies for supporting this work: the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB934104), the NSF of China (21322311, 21071033), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10-0357), the Shanghai Pujiang Program (10PJ1401000), and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning.

References

  1. Wei W., Cui X., Chen W. & Ivey D. G. Manganese oxide-based materials as electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 1697–1721 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Song M.-K. et al. Anomalous pseudocapacitive behavior of a nanostructured, mixed-valent manganese oxide film for electrical energy storage. Nano Lett. 12, 3483–3490 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen W., Rakhi R. B., Hu L., Xie X., Cui Y. & Alshareef H. N. High-Performance Nanostructured Supercapacitors on a Sponge. Nano Lett. 11, 5165–5172 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Débart A., Paterson A. J., Bao J. & Bruce P. G. α-MnO2 Nanowires: A Catalyst for the O2 electrode in rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 120, 4597–4600 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai Y.-H., Xu J.-J. & Chen H.-Y. Selective sensing of cysteine on manganese dioxide nanowires and chitosan modified glassy carbon electrodes. Biosensor. Bioelectronic. 24, 2985–2990 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen J., Zhang W.-D. & Ye J.-S. Nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensor based on MnO2/MWNTs nanocomposite. Electrochem. Comm. 10, 1268–1271 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhu J. et al. Oxidation-etching preparation of MnO2 tubular nanostructures for high-performance supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 2769–2774 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gogotsi Y. & Simon P. True performance metrics in electrochemical energy storage. Science 334, 917–918 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sun B., Chen Z., Kim H.-S., Ahn H. & Wang G. MnO/C core–shell nanorods as high capacity anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 196, 3346–3349 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ragupathy P. et al. Remarkable capacity retention of nanostructured manganese oxide upon cycling as an electrode material for supercapacitor. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 6303–6309 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu R. & Lee S. B. MnO2/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) coaxial nanowires by one-step coelectrodeposition for electrochemical energy storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2942–2943 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Reddy A. L. M., Shaijumon M. M., Gowda S. R. & Ajayan P. M. Coaxial MnO2/carbon nanotube array electrodes for high-performance lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 9, 1002–1006 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fei J. et al. Controlled preparation of MnO2 hierarchical hollow nanostructures and their application in water treatment. Adv. Mater. 20, 452–456 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghodbane O., Pascal J.-L. & Favier F. Microstructural effects on charge-storage properties in MnO2-based electrochemical supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1, 1130–1139 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakayama M., Tanaka A., Sato Y., Tonosaki T. & Ogura K. Electrodeposition of manganese and molybdenum mixed oxide thin films and their charge storage properties. Langmuir 21, 5907–5913 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li B., Rong G., Xie Y., Huang L. & Feng C. Low-temperature synthesis of α-MnO2 hollow urchins and their application in rechargeable Li+ batteries. Inorg. Chem. 45, 6404–6410 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu Z.-S., Ren W., Wang D.-W., Li F., Liu B. & Cheng H.-M. High-energy MnO2 nanowire/graphene and graphene asymmetric electrochemical capacitors. ACS Nano 4, 5835–5842 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer A. E., Pettigrew K. A., Rolison D. R., Stroud R. M. & Long J. W. Incorporation of homogeneous, nanoscale MnO2 within ultraporous carbon structures via self-limiting electroless deposition: Implications for electrochemical capacitors. Nano Lett. 7, 281–286 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang H. et al. Mn3O4-graphene hybrid as a high-capacity anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13978–13980 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee J. W., Hall A. S., Kim J.-D. & Mallouk T. E. A facile and template-free hydrothermal synthesis of Mn3O4 nanorods on graphene sheets for supercapacitor electrodes with long cycle stability. Chem. Mater. 24, 1158–1164 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang H., Yang L., Li C.,Yan C., Lee P. S. & Ma J. High–rate electrochemical capacitors from highly graphitic carbon–tipped manganese oxide/mesoporous carbon/manganese oxide hybrid nanowires. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1813–1819 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhong K. et al. Investigation on porous MnO microsphere anode for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 196, 6802–6808 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  23. Schachl K., Alemu H., Kalcher K., Ježkova J., Švancara I. & Vytřas K. Amperometric determination of hydrogen peroxide with a manganese dioxide-modified carbon paste electrode using flow injection analysis. Analyst 122, 985–989 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  24. Deng C. et al. New glucose biosensor based on a poly(o-phenylendiamine)/glucose oxidase-glutaraldehyde/prussian blue/Au electrode with QCM monitoring of various electrode-surface modifications. Anal. Chimica Acta 557, 85–94 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  25. Li L. et al. A novel nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on MnO2/graphene oxide nanocomposite. Talanta 82, 1637–1641 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang Z., Shen J. & Archer L. A. An in situ method of creating metal oxide-carbon composites and their application as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 11092–11097 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  27. Park J. et al. Ultra-large-scale syntheses of monodisperse nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 3, 891–895 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang Y., Xu J., Wu H., Xu M., Peng Z. & Zheng G. Hierarchical SnO2-Fe2O3 heterostructures as lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 21923–21927 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  29. Feng D. et al. Free-standing mesoporous carbon thin films with highly ordered pore architectures for nanodevices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 15148–15156 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu M.-S., Chiang P.-C. J., Lee J.-T. & Lin J.-C. Synthesis of manganese oxide electrodes with interconnected nanowire structure as an anode material for rechargeable lithium ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 23279–23284 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang K., Wang Y., Wang Y., Hosono E. & Zhou H. Mesoporous carbon nanofibers for supercapacitor application. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 1093–1097 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  32. Jiang R. et al. Factors influencing MnO2/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite's electrochemical performance as supercapacitor electrode. Electrochimica Acta 54, 7173–7179 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  33. Bordjiba T. & Bélanger D. Direct redox deposition of manganese oxide on multiscaled carbon nanotube/microfiber carbon electrode for electrochemical capacitor. J. Electrochem. Soc. 156, A378–A384 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen S., Zhu J., Wu X., Han Q. & Wang X. Graphene oxide-MnO2 nanocomposites for supercapacitors. ACS Nano 4, 2822–2830 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Xing W. et al. Superior electric double layer capacitors using ordered mesoporous carbons. Carbon 44, 216–224 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu J., Essner J. & Li J. Hybrid supercapacitor based on coaxially coated manganese oxide on vertically aligned carbon nanofiber arrays. Chem. Mater. 22, 5022–5030 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  37. Yan J., Khoo E., Sumboja A. & Lee P. S. Facile coating of manganese oxide on tin oxide nanowires with high-performance capacitive behavior. ACS Nano 4, 4247–4255 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tian B., Cohen-Karni T., Qing Q., Duan X., Xie P. & Lieber C. M. Three-dimensional, flexible nanoscale field-effect transistors as localized bioprobes. Science 329, 830–834 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li X., Liu Y., Zhu A., Luo Y., Deng Z. & Tian Y. Real-time electrochemical monitoring of cellular H2O2 integrated with in situ selective cultivation of living cells based on dual functional protein microarrays at Au-TiO2 surfaces. Anal. Chem. 82, 6512–6518 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Luo Y., Liu H., Rui Q. & Tian Y. Detection of extracellular H2O2 released from human liver cancer cells based on TiO2 nanoneedles with enhanced electron transfer of cytochrome c. Anal. Chem. 81, 3035–3041 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lippert A. R., Van de Bittner G. C. & Chang C. J. Boronate oxidation as a bioorthogonal reaction approach for studying the chemistry of hydrogen peroxide in living systems. Acct. Chem. Res. 44, 793–804 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu H., Wang G., Liu J., Qiao S. & Ahn H. Highly ordered mesoporous NiO anode material for lithium ion batteries with an excellent electrochemical performance. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 3046–3052 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo J., Jang H. & Huang J. X. Effect of sheet morphology on the scalability of graphene-based ultracapacitors. ACS Nano 7, 1464–1471 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mai L. et al. Nanoscroll buffered hybrid nanostructural VO2(B) cathodes for high-rate and long-life lithium storage. Adv. Mater. 25, 2969–2973 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Thiagarajan S., Tsai T. H. & Chen S.-M. Electrochemical fabrication of nano manganese oxide modified electrode for the detection of H2O2. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci 6, 2235–2245 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep02693-s1.doc (1.2MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES