Skip to main content
Molecular Syndromology logoLink to Molecular Syndromology
. 2013 Aug 1;4(6):267–272. doi: 10.1159/000353878

Array-CGH Analysis Suggests Genetic Heterogeneity in Rhombencephalosynapsis

F Démurger a,b, L Pasquier a,*, C Dubourg b,c, V Dupé b, I Gicquel b, C Evain b, L Ratié b, S Jaillard e, M Beri h, B Leheup h, J Lespinasse i, D Martin-Coignard j, S Mercier a,b, C Quelin a, P Loget d, P Marcorelles f, A Laquerrière g, C Bendavid b, S Odent a,b, V David b,c
PMCID: PMC3776394  PMID: 24167461

Abstract

Rhombencephalosynapsis is an uncommon, but increasingly recognized, cerebellar malformation defined as vermian agenesis with fusion of the hemispheres. The embryologic and genetic mechanisms involved are still unknown, and to date, no animal models are available. In the present study, we used Agilent oligonucleotide arrays in a large series of 57 affected patients to detect candidate genes. Four different unbalanced rearrangements were detected: a 16p11.2 deletion, a 14q12q21.2 deletion, an unbalanced translocation t(2p;10q), and a 16p13.11 microdeletion containing 2 candidate genes. These genes were further investigated by sequencing and in situ hybridization. This first microarray screening of a rhombencephalosynapsis series suggests that there may be heterogeneous genetic causes.

Key Words: Array-CGH, Copy Number Variation, NDE1, Rhombencephalosynapsis


Rhombencephalosynapsis (RS) is a rare congenital defect of the cerebellum. It is classically defined as vermian agenesis or hypogenesis with fusion of the cerebellar hemispheres. Since the first description by Obersteiner [1914], less than 200 cases have been reported. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a series of 3,000 consecutive paediatric brains led to its frequency being estimated at 0.13% [Sener, 2000]. However, the systematic use of MRI in the prenatal period suggests that the frequency of RS may be much higher: we have observed 40 foetal cases over 15 years [Pasquier et al., 2009]. Ishak et al. [2012] identified RS in almost 10% of patients with aqueductal stenosis, indicating that RS is more common than previously thought.

The severity of the clinical presentation is highly variable. In the prenatal period, RS is usually suggested by ventriculomegaly. Complete autopsy allows pure neurological phenotypes and those associated with extraneural anomalies to be distinguished from syndromic forms: Gomez-Lopez-Hernandez (GLH) syndrome (MIM 601853) [Lopez-Hernandez, 1982; Poretti et al., 2008] and VACTERL-H syndrome (MIM 276950) [Michaud et al., 1982; Pasquier et al., 2009]. In foetal cases, isolated RS without fusion of the colliculi (also named mesencephalosynapsis) or aqueductal anomalies are never observed; various associated supratentorial abnormalities, such as agenesis of the corpus callosum, atresia of the third ventricle and holoprosencephaly, have been described [Pasquier et al., 2009; Mercier et al., 2011; Ishak et al., 2012]. In the postnatal period, there is impaired neurological function in most cases [Romanengo et al., 1997; Danon et al., 2000], although in some cases of RS cognitive functions are normal [Obersteiner, 1914; Bell et al., 2005; Poretti et al., 2009]. The neurological outcome is difficult to predict during pregnancy, but supratentorial [Sandalcioglu et al., 2006] and chromosomal anomalies [Lespinasse et al., 2004] are each always associated with poor prognosis. This has been confirmed by a large series of 42 postnatal cases [Ishak et al., 2012]. The imaging features that correlated with poor neurodevelopmental outcome were holoprosencephaly, severity of ventriculomegaly, aqueductal stenosis, fused colliculi, and abnormal temporal cortex.

RS is considered to be a sporadic condition and its aetiology remains poorly understood. Several factors have been suggested to be involved, including teratogenic agents like phencyclidine [Michaud et al., 1982; Sergi et al., 1997], chromosomal [Truwit et al., 1991; Lespinasse et al., 2004] and genetic [Yachnis, 2002] factors. Reviews of foetal cases led to the suggestion that RS may be the result of defects in genes regulating the formation of the roof plate and development of the midline cerebellar primordium at the junction of the mesencephalon and the first rhombomere between 28 and 42 days post-conception [Utsunomiya et al., 1998; Pasquier et al., 2009]. Genes implicated in early development have also been discussed as candidates, but no animal models have been described [Millonig et al., 2000]. It has not been possible to perform linkage analyses because familial cases are rare.

Only 2 different chromosomal abnormalities have previously been reported to be associated with RS. We therefore performed a genome-wide screening for submicroscopic anomalies in our RS cohort with no known karyotype alterations, using array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH). Four microrearrangements were identified, and 2 of them were demonstrated to be de novo. For the best candidate genes, we performed in situ hybridization to localize gene expression in the chick embryo model and screened for mutations.

Methods

Patients

We studied 57 cases (from 56 families) with normal karyotypes including 49 foetuses and 8 children or adults; these cases were identified and included through a collaborative study involving several French centres over the last 2 decades. We searched for consanguinity and recurrences as often as possible.

In all foetal cases, pregnancy was terminated either for hydrocephalus or RS discovered by ultrasound or MRI screening, according to the French law. These foetuses underwent a complete autopsy by standardized protocols. The pathological findings were reviewed systematically and have been reported previously [Pasquier et al., 2009].

The diagnosis of RS in live-born patients was supported by brain MRI screening performed for mental retardation or neurological symptoms.

Parents of all patients gave their informed consent.

Array-CGH

Blood samples, chorionic villi, amniotic fluid or foetal tissues were processed by the Molecular Genetic Laboratory of Rennes for microarray analysis.

Oligonucleotide array-CGH was performed after DNA extraction using the Agilent Human Genome CGH microarrays 44K (44 patients) and 180K (13 patients) (Agilent Technologies). Reference genomic DNAs from male and female controls were used to characterize copy number polymorphisms (CNPs). Microarrays were scanned using the Agilent scanner of the Biogenouest® Genomic Platform of Rennes. Images were analysed with Agilent Feature Extraction Software version 10.5.

Rearrangements identified by array-CGH were confirmed either by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) or multiplex PCR liquid chromatography (MPLC).

Sequencing

The 5 coding exons of the C16orf45 gene were amplified by PCR and analysed by direct sequencing using the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) and the ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer on the whole cohort.

The 8 coding exons of the NDE1 gene were amplified by PCR and analysed as well only on case 4.

Whole-Mount in situ Hybridization

To characterize the spatiotemporal expression of the candidate genes suspected after microarray analysis, we performed whole-mount in situ hybridization on chick embryos using antisense digoxigenin-labelled riboprobes as previously described [Chapman et al., 2002]. In order to clone the chick orthologs of the candidate genes, we used sequence-specific primers for each of the genes designed according to the chick reference sequences (www.ensemble.org). NDE1 cDNA was obtained from the total RNA isolated from chicken brain (Zyagen Laboratories) by reverse transcription PCR using left (CAGAACCTCCTCCAAGCAAG) and right (GCATTGGGTGGCTAATGTCT) primers for C16orf45 and left (TCCCTCAGTGTTAGGGTTTGG) and right (GTGAAGGATGGCTATTGGT) primers for NDE1. The amplified product was cloned into the PCRII TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced at the Institute of Genetics and Development of Rennes. For the construction of the sense probe, the plasmid was digested with BamH1, while for the antisense probe the plasmid was digested using EcoRV. Riboprobes were transcribed from 1 μg of the linearized plasmids in the presence of DIG RNA labelling mix (Roche) and 20 U RNA polymerase (Roche), Sp6 for antisense and T7 for sense probes used as controls.

Results

Array-CGH

Thirty-four patients were male and 23 female (sex ratio 1.5). Two patients were siblings, and there was evidence of parental consanguinity in 2 other cases.

Chromosomal imbalances not described in the database of genomic variants (DGV) were detected in 4 (2 foetuses, 2 children) of the 57 patients (7%) (table 1), leading to the identification of new candidate loci. Additional copy number variants (CNVs) were discarded after interrogation of the DGV.

Table 1.

Clinical and molecular features of the patients with pathogenic CNPs

Case Sex Child/foetus Clinical features Chromosomal rearrangement (size) Inheritance Breakpoints (hg19)
1 F C partial RS, growth retardation, developmental delay, dysmorphism 2pter duplication (10.5 Mb) 10qter deletion (9 Mb) paternally balanced translocation 38,993 – 10,587,646 126,261,414 – 135,404,671
2 M FOE complete RS, hemivertebrae, costal anomalies 16p11.2 deletion (446 kb) paternally inherited 29,673,754 – 30,119,912
3 F FOE complete RS, partial agenesis of corpus callosum 14q12q21.2 deletion (16 Mb) de novo 27,867,357 – 44,582,530
4 M C partial RS, Gomez-Lopez-Hernandez syndrome 16p13.11 deletion (2.7 Mb) de novo 15,256,486 – 18,012,602

C = Child; FOE = foetus.

Case 1

Trisomy 2pter associated with monosomy 10qter was identified by multi-telomeric FISH in a 2-year-old girl with partial RS and growth and developmental delay associated with dysmorphic features. During the prenatal period, increased nuchal translucency, a slight hypoplastic cerebellum and intrauterine growth retardation had been observed. The rearrangement was found to be inherited from the father who carried a balanced subtelomeric translocation t(2p;10q) [Lespinasse et al., 2004]. The sizes of the rearrangements were determined from the 44K oligonucleotide Agilent array as 10.5 Mb for the 2pter duplication and 9 Mb for the 10qter deletion. Surprisingly, chromosome analysis using standard (450 bands) and high-resolution (800 bands) procedures showed a normal karyotype probably because of the similar size of the rearranged telomeric regions.

Case 2

A heterozygous deletion of the region 16p11.2 was identified in a male foetus with a 44K microarray. The pregnancy was terminated medically at 19 weeks of gestation for hydrocephaly, cerebellar hypoplasia and a hemivertebra. The autopsy revealed complete RS, costo-vertebral abnormalities and dysmorphic features, as described previously [Pasquier et al., 2009]. This 446-kb deletion covering 27 genes was confirmed by MLPA (SALSA P343 kit, MRC Holland). The deletion was inherited from the phenotypically normal father.

Case 3

A de novo heterozygous deletion of 16 Mb in 14q12 encompassing more than 40 OMIM genes was detected in a female foetus (105K microarray). Hydrocephalus was diagnosed by the ultrasound scan during the second trimester. Morphological analysis of the foetus after medical termination of the pregnancy confirmed the typical cerebellar malformation associated with marked aqueductal stenosis and partial agenesis of the corpus callosum.

Case 4

A 2.7-Mb de novo deletion of the region 16p13.11 was identified by array-CGH using a 44K microarray in a 5-year-old boy who presented with learning difficulties. He had bilateral temporal alopecia and partial RS (fig. 1), strongly suggestive of GLH syndrome. This deletion covered 19 genes. Two of the deleted genes, NDE1 and C16orf45, were selected as candidates and were further investigated by sequencing and in situ hybridization.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Patient 4. a Bilateral alopecia. b Abnormal transverse folial running across the midline.

Sequencing of C16orf45 and NDE1

All 57 patients of the cohort were analysed for mutations in the 5 coding exons of C16orf45, including patient 4 with the deletion of one of the alleles. No mutation was found. Only 2 polymorphisms listed in the NCBI database were found in RS patients with the expected rate. The sequencing of the 8 coding exons of NDE1 did not reveal any mutation of the remaining allele in case 4 (data not shown).

NDE1 and C16orf45 mRNA in situ Hybridization Studies

We examined the expression pattern of NDE1 and C16orf45 in chick embryos during the characterization of the cerebellar territory in the hindbrain corresponding to Hamburger and Hamilton stage 14 (HH14). We observed no signal with the sense probes for NDE1 and C16orf45, but with the antisense probe, we did observe strong specific expression of NDE1 in the nervous system (fig. 2), whereas expression of C16orf45 was ubiquitous (data not shown).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Expression of chick NDE1 at stage HH14 in whole embryos. a Lateral view. Left: in situ expression with the sense probe; right: in situ expression with the antisense probe. b Dorsal view. d = Diencephalon; mes = mesencephalon; met = metencephalon; mhb = midbrain-hindbrain boundary; ot = otic vesicle; r1-r5 = rhombomeres; t = telencephalon; v = optic vesicle. Bracket indicates the cerebellar territory in the hindbrain (metencephalon part).

Discussion

We report the first large series of RS patients analyzed by array-CGH. Microrearrangements were detected in 7% of the RS cases. The microarray analysis did not identify recurrent rearrangements or deletions of regions encompassing genes known to be involved in embryogenesis of the cerebellum.

No patients with 10qter monosomy or 2pter trisomy have been reported in the literature to have RS [Courtens et al., 2006; Bonaglia et al., 2009]. The very large size of genomic regions involved did not allow us to highlight a particular candidate gene.

Microdeletions of a ∼600-kb genomic region on chromosome 16p11.2, as in case 2, have been shown to be associated with a wide spectrum of neurobehavioral abnormalities, including developmental delay, autism, seizures [Shinawi et al., 2010], and obesity [Walters et al., 2010]. Congenital malformations have been reported in 30-50% of patients with CNVs of 16p11.2. The incidence of structural brain malformations is high among patients with the 16p11.2 deletion, but it is the first time that such a deletion is described in association with RS, suggesting either fortuitous association or low penetrance (the deletion is inherited from the healthy father – cerebral MRI not made) possibly through unmasking of recessive mutations.

Array-CGH analysis identified a chromosome 14 interstitial deletion of about 16 Mb in a foetus presenting partial agenesis of corpus callosum and complete RS associated with aqueductal stenosis. The deleted region encompasses the gene FOXG1 which encodes a brain-specific transcriptional repressor that is essential for early development of the telencephalon. Mutations and deletions at this locus have been associated with congenital variant of Rett syndrome consisting of postnatal microcephaly, severe mental retardation, absent language, dyskinesia, and corpus callosum hypogenesis [Kortum et al., 2011], but no RS has been described.

The 16p13.11 deletion we report is particularly interesting because it was de novo; the patient shows features of the GLH syndrome whose aetiology remains unknown to date. Note that the 16p13.11 microdeletion syndrome is associated with neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia [Ingason et al., 2011], developmental delay [Ullmann et al., 2007] and epilepsy [de Kovel et al., 2010]. Two candidate genes emerge from our study. The NDE1 gene (nuclear distribution gene E nude homologue 1) seems to be a good candidate for the developmental delay of the patient. Indeed, whole-mount in situ hybridization for NDE1 in chick embryos using antisense digoxigenin-labelled riboprobes showed strong and specific expression of NDE1 in the nervous system, in particular at the mesencephalic-metencephalic junction during the development of the cerebellar territory in the hindbrain, corresponding to stage HH14 (fig. 2). This protein is essential for microtubule organization, mitosis and neuronal migration. Pawlisz et al. [2008] showed that NDE1 interacts with LIS1 to determine cerebral cortical size and lamination. Bakircioglu et al. [2011] recently described a human developmental disease involving extreme primary microcephaly with disordered cortical lamination (microlissencephaly) caused by biallelic NDE1 mutations. The sequencing of the 8 coding exons of NDE1 did not reveal any mutation of the remaining allele in our case 4, excluding the possibility of its involvement following recessive inheritance. The second gene, C16orf45, is significantly expressed in the cerebellum according to the ‘Gene Expression Omnibus’ (GEO, NCBI) database and was expressed ubiquitously in the chick embryo at stage HH14 (data not shown). It encodes a protein that interacts with Enog, a protein with neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties [Hattori et al., 1995]. In this case, unmasking a recessive mutation by deletion of the second allele may have been the mechanism explaining the occurrence of GLH syndrome. However, this analysis failed to reveal deleterious mutations.

All cases with chromosomal anomalies presented with either supratentorial anomalies (hydrocephaly) or neurological disabilities. Therefore, it would be valuable to offer microarray screening during pregnancy when the diagnosis is suspected in order to predict the neurodevelopmental outcome as precisely as possible. Also, as RS is a multigenic disease with variable expressivity, inherited genetic anomalies may contribute to a RS genetic background, and thus these inherited deletions should be recorded.

The identification and characterisation of more genomic imbalances associated with RS will allow further delineation of minimal critical RS loci, which is the first step towards the identification of new RS genes.

Thus, total exome sequencing for cases of GLH and RS would be valuable and informative.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the families, geneticists and pathologists, especially Dr. J. Martinovic who participated in this study. This work is supported by grants from the French Hospital Clinical Research Program 2008 (PHRC inter-régional ARM 08/242).

References

  • 1.Bakircioglu M, Carvalho OP, Khurshid M, Cox JJ, Tuysuz B, et al. The essential role of centrosomal NDE1 in human cerebral cortex neurogenesis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:523–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bell BD, Stanko HA, Levine RL. Normal IQ in a 55-year-old with newly diagnosed rhombencephalosynapsis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:613–621. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bonaglia MC, Giorda R, Massagli A, Galluzzi R, Ciccone R, Zuffardi O. A familial inverted duplication/deletion of 2p25.1-25.3 provides new clues on the genesis of inverted duplications. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:179–186. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chapman SC, Schubert FR, Schoenwolf GC, Lumsden A. Analysis of spatial and temporal gene expression patterns in blastula and gastrula stage chick embryos. Dev Biol. 2002;245:187–199. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Courtens W, Wuyts W, Rooms L, Pera SB, Wauters J. A subterminal deletion of the long arm of chromosome 10: a clinical report and review. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140:402–409. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Danon O, Elmaleh M, Boukobza B, Fohlen M, Hadjnacer K, Hassan M. Rhombencephalosynapsis diagnosed in childhood: clinical and MRI findings. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18:99–101. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00113-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Kovel CG, Trucks H, Helbig I, Mefford HC, Baker C, et al. Recurrent microdeletions at 15q11.2 and 16p13.11 predispose to idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Brain. 2010;133:23–32. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hattori T, Takei N, Mizuno Y, Kato K, Kohsaka S. Neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects of neuron-specific enolase on cultured neurons from embryonic rat brain. Neurosci Res. 1995;21:191–198. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(94)00849-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ingason A, Rujescu D, Cichon S, Sigurdsson E, Sigmundsson T, et al. Copy number variations of chromosome 16p13.1 region associated with schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:17–25. doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ishak GE, Dempsay JC, Shaw DW, Tully H, Adam MP, et al. Rhombencephalosynapsis: a hindbrain malformation associated with incomplete separation of midbrain and forebrain, hydrocephalus and a broad spectrum of severity. Brain. 2012;135:1370–1386. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kortum F, Das S, Flindt M, Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Stefanova I, et al. The core FOXG1 syndrome phenotype consists of postnatal microcephaly, severe mental retardation, absent language, dyskinesia, and corpus callosum hypogenesis. J Med Genet. 2001;48:396–406. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.087528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lespinasse J, Testard H, Nugues F, Till M, Cordier MP, et al. A submicroscopic unbalanced subtelomeric translocation t(2p;10q) identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization: fetus with increased nuchal translucency and normal standard karyotype with later growth and developmental delay, rhombencephalosynapsis (RES) Ann Genet. 2004;47:405–417. doi: 10.1016/j.anngen.2004.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopez-Hernandez A. Craniosynostosis, ataxia, trigeminal anaesthesia and parietal alopecia with pons-vermis fusion anomaly (atresia of the fourth ventricle). Report of two cases. Neuropediatrics. 1982;13:99–102. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1059606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mercier S, Dubourg C, Garcelon N, Campillo-Gimenez B, Gicquel I, et al. New findings for phenotype-genotype correlations in a large European series of holoprosencephaly cases. J Med Genet. 2011;48:752–760. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Michaud J, Mizhari EM, Urich H. Agenesis of the vermis with fusion of the cerebellar hemispheres, septo-optic dysplasia and associated anomalies. Report of a case. Acta Neuropathol. 1982;56:161–166. doi: 10.1007/BF00690631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Millonig JH, Millen KJ, Hatten ME. The mouse Dreher gene Lmx1a controls formation of the roof plate in the vertebrate CNS. Nature. 2000;403:764–769. doi: 10.1038/35001573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Obersteiner H. Ein Kleinhirn ohne Wurm. Arb Neurol Inst (Wien) 1914;21:124–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pasquier L, Marcorelles P, Loget P, Pelluard F, Carles D, et al. Rhombencephalosynapsis and related anomalies: a neuropathological study of 40 fetal cases. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;117:185–200. doi: 10.1007/s00401-008-0469-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pawlisz AS, Mutch C, Wynshaw-Boris A, Chenn A, Walsh CA, Feng Y. Lis1-Nde1-dependent neuronal fate control determines cerebral cortical size and lamination. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:2441–2455. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Poretti A, Bartholdi D, Gobara S, Alber FD, Boltshauser E. Gomez-Lopez-Hernandez syndrome: an easily missed diagnosis. Eur J Med Genet. 2008;51:197–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Poretti A, Alber FD, Bürki S, Toelle SP, Boltshauser E. Cognitive outcome in children with rhombencephalosynapsis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009;13:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Romanengo M, Tortori-Donati P, Di Rocco M. Rhombencephalosynapsis with facial anomalies and probable autosomal recessive inheritance: a case report. Clin Genet. 1997;52:184–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1997.tb02542.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sandalcioglu IE, Gasser T, van de Nes JA, Menken U, Stolke D, Wiedemayer H. Fusion of the cerebellar hemispheres ventral to the brainstem: a rare hindbrain-related malformation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22:73–77. doi: 10.1007/s00381-004-1065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sener RN. Unusual MRI findings in rhombencephalosynapsis. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2000;24:277–282. doi: 10.1016/s0895-6111(00)00025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sergi C, Hentze S, Sohn C, Voigtländer T, Jung C, Schmitt HP. Telencephalosynapsis (synencephaly) and rhombencephalosynapsis with posterior fossa ventriculocele (‘Dandy-Walker cyst’): an unusual aberrant syngenetic complex. Brain Dev. 1997;19:426–432. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(97)00050-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shinawi M, Liu P, Kang SH, Shen J, Belmont JW, et al. Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. J Med Genet. 2010;47:332–341. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.073015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Truwit CL, Barkovich AJ, Shanahan R, Maroldo TV. MR imaging of rhombencephalosynapsis: report of three cases and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12:957–965. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ullmann R, Turner G, Kirchhoff M, Chen W, Tonge B, et al. Array CGH identifies reciprocal 16p13.1 duplications and deletions that predispose to autism and/or mental retardation. Hum Mutat. 2007;28:674–682. doi: 10.1002/humu.20546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Utsunomiya H, Takano K, Ogasawara T, Hashimoto T, Fukushima T, Okazaki M. Rhombencephalosynapsis: cerebellar embryogenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:547–549. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walters RG, Jacquemont S, Valsesia A, de Smith AJ, Martinet D, et al. A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2. Nature. 2010;463:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nature08727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yachnis AT. Rhombencephalosynapsis with massive hydrocephalus: case report and pathogenetic considerations. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;103:301–304. doi: 10.1007/s004010100454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Syndromology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES