Skip to main content
Chinese Journal of Cancer logoLink to Chinese Journal of Cancer
. 2012 Apr;31(4):207–214. doi: 10.5732/cjc.011.10336

Expression of miR-125b in the new, highly invasive glioma stem cell and progenitor cell line SU3

Yi Wan 1,*, Xi-Feng Fei 1,*, Zhi-Min Wang 1, Dong-Yi Jiang 1, Han-Chun Chen 1, Jian Yang 2, Lei Shi 2, Qiang Huang 3
PMCID: PMC3777477  PMID: 22360855

Abstract

MicroRNA (miR)-125b has been shown to play a potential role in the development of glioma stem cells. However, the relationship between miRNA and glioma stem cells is still elusive. This study was designed to elucidate this potential relationship. We established a highly invasive glioma stem cell and progenitor (GSCP) cell line SU3. SU3 cell suspensions were injected into nude mice brains in situ, and the invasiveness of graft tumors was analyzed using hematoxylin and eosin staining as well as immunohistochemistry. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to measure the expression levels of miR-125b in SU3 and other cells. In vitro, SU3 cells expressed CD133 and nestin as well as differentiation markers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and β-tubulin III, which were consistent with the characteristics of glioma stem cells. Scratch assays indicated that the migration ability of SU3 cells was stronger than that of U251 stem cells (U251s). In vivo, SU3 cells invaded into each part of the mouse brain from the caudate nucleus in a diffuse pattern and highly expressed invasive and proliferative cell markers matrix metalloprotease 2 (MMP2), MMP9, and Ki-67. Real-time PCR results revealed that the levels of miR-125b and MMP9 were significantly higher in SU3 and SU2, also a highly invasive GSCP cell line we established before, than in U251s. High expression of miR-125b both in newly established GSCPs, SU3, and long-term cultured GSCPs, SU2 suggests that miR-125b exhibits oncogene-like behavior. This behavior should be considered in further studies of miR-125b in cancer stem cells. Furthermore, MMP9, which plays a role in cancer stem cell invasion, may be a target gene of miR-125b.

Keywords: Tumor stem cells, tumor invasion, miRNA, metalloprotease


Reya et al.[1] reported the first study of cancer stem cells 10 years ago, and glioma stem cells (GSCs) have been under investigation for 8 years[2]. Presently, GSCs are being investigated as “seed cells” of tumor occurrence, progression, and resistance to drugs and radiotherapy. In addition, many studies have been undertaken to identify novel functions of GSCs. Despite the great progress in understanding GSC biology, controversy still exists[3]. Although GSCs share extensive similarities, individual discrepancies should be noted. These differences probably serve as a factor provoking controversy because the GSCs used in experimental studies are neither controlled by the same standard nor from the same source. In order to analyze the invasiveness of GSCs, we cloned GSCs within disseminated tumor lesions from a patient with glioma to establish a highly invasive glioma stem cell and progenitor (GSCP) cell line and analyzed the relationship between the invasiveness of GSCPs and microRNA (miRNA) by using miR-125b as the target gene.

Materials and Methods

Materials

NC nude mice from Japan Nagoya Health University were bred by Professor Qiang Huang (the Second Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University) and reared in the Experimental Animal Center of Soochow University [License No. SY×K (Jiangsu Province) 2007–0035] [4]. The fluorescence microscope, stereoscopic orientation device, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) device were supplied by Olympus, Huaibei Zhenghua Bio-instruments Co. Ltd., and iCyderiQ Company, respectively. DMEM/F12 medium and the medium supplements B27, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) were purchased from Invitrogen. Primary antibodies CD133, nestin, and Ki-67 were purchased from Abcam and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was from BD Biosciences Company. β-tubulin III, matrix metalloprotease 2 (MMP2), and MMP9 were purchased from Beijing Zhongshan Goldenbridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The miRNA-125b kit, SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ Perfect Real Time Kit, was purchased from TaKaRa. GSCP cell line SU2 was established by our lab.

Development of the highly invasive human brain glioma stem cell and progenitor cell line SU3

A neurosurgical specimen of human brain glioma was collected at the Second Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University. The specimen was obtained from a 50-year-old man with recurrent glioma that was pathologically diagnosed as glioblastoma multiforme after surgery. The SU3 cell line was established according to the methods by which we established SU2 as previously reported[5]. Briefly, living tissue was collected from the disseminated glioma lesion. After the vessels and piamater layer were removed, the sample was sheared with a sharp tool, digested with 0.25% trypsin for 10-20 min, filtered through a 70-µm sieve (BD Biosciences), treated with Lympholyte-M (Cedarlane company) to remove red blood cells, prepared for single cell suspension, and incubated under serum-free conditions. The tumor spheres in suspension were screened by CD133 immunomagnetic beads to obtain stem cells and then single cells were pumped by using capillary pipe (fishing method) under microscope for subsequent cloning to assure that the SU3 cell line was originated from one single cell. Sorted cells were then incubated in serum solution. After attachment, cells were collected along with the tumor spheres incubated under serum-free conditions. These cells were subjected to immunohistochemical methods to measure the concentration of marker proteins for progenitor cells and cells in different phases of differentiation. Their in vitro proliferation and in vivo tumorigenicity were also assessed. The cells qualified for cell line establishment were stored in liquid nitrogen for subsequent analysis.

In vitro invasiveness test

U251 is a glioma cell line known to have stable biological characteristics and low invasiveness, making it a useful comparison for SU3 cells on invasive biological characteristics. Based on the method we previously reported[6], U251 and SU3 cells were cultured using stem cell conditions. Resultant cell spheres cultured in serum-free condition (named U251s or SU3s) and attached cells cultured in 10% FBS (named U251d or SU3d) were collected and digested into single cells for the scratch assay as described in the following steps. Horizontal lines spaced approximately 0.5–1.0 cm apart were evenly marked across the wells on the back of the 6-well plates using a color pen. At least 5 lines passed through each well. Approximately 5 × 105 cells were injected into each well; the number of cells varied according to the type of cell. The cells were incubated in serum-containing solution and transferred to stem cell conditions 2 h later. The next day, a tip was positioned with a ruler to ensure, to every possible extent, that it was placed perpendicular to the horizontal lines drawn on the back of each plate. The cells were rinsed with PBS three times. The detached cells were discarded and the remaining cells were cultured in media containing serum. The cultured cells were kept in an incubator at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Samples were obtained and photographed 0, 3, 6, and 12 h after incubation.

In vivo invasiveness test

To test their invasiveness in vivo, SU3 cells were inoculated into the caudate nucleus of NC nude mice. The mice were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of 10% chloralic hydrate (200 mg/kg), and a 5-mm incision was made longitudinally at the center of the cranic top. At 1 mm in front of the bregma and 2.5 mm right from the halfway line, a cranium drill with a 1-mm diameter was inserted until the endocranium was reached. Using a stereoscopic orientation device for assistance, a 25-µL microsyringe was used to slowly inject (10 min; insertion needle 3.5 mm) an SU3 cell suspension solution with 1 × 105 cells in 15 µL into the right caudate nucleus of the mice. The syringe was retained in place for 2 min after injection and then slowly removed. The keyhole was sealed using bone wax, and the skin was closed using size 1 sutures. Four to five weeks after cancer stem cell inoculation, the treated mice presented response retardation, reduced food intake, and emaciation, and they gradually exhibited cachexia. The mice were then euthanatized. The whole brain was prepared for further analysis.

Real-time PCR of miR-125b and MMP9

Total RNA was extracted from U251s, SU2, and SU3 cells with Trizol, respectively. The samples were treated using PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa), and a reverse transcription was performed with a gradient PCR device. The obtained cDNA templates were used for real-time PCR amplification, and U6 was used as internal reference. The reaction mixture contained 10 µL SYBR Premix Ex Taq™, 0.4 µL PCR forward and reverse primers, and 1-2 µL total cDNA and dH2O (added to a final volume of 20 mL). Forward and reverse primers for the reaction were as follows: 5′-ACTGATAAATCCCTGAGACCCTAAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TATGGTTGTTCTGCTCTCTGTCAC-3′ (reverse) for miR-125b (GenBank accession number NM_171992); 5′-GCTCTTCCCTGGAGACCTGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TGC CACCCGAGTGTAACCAT-3′ (reverse) for MMP9 (GenBank accession number Y00047). Real-time PCR results were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method[7].

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 4 software was adopted for statistical analysis and chart drawing. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons among groups were analyzed using ANOVA. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Growth characteristics of highly invasive SU3 cells

In vitro, SU3 cells grew as suspended spheres in the conditional media containing growth factors, but they attached to the walls of the culture dish and differentiated, displaying star-shaped, fusiform, and other morphologies in the culture media containing serum. Using immunofluorescence, we detected SU3 cells were positive for stem cell marker CD133; differentiated SU3 cells cultured in serum condition were positive for the progentior cell marker nestin and differentiation markers GFAP and β-tubulin III. Both of the cells possessed indefinite proliferation proficiency (Figure 1). In scratch tests, both SU3s and differentiated SU3d cells migrated toward scratch site after 6 h, and the number of migrated cells dramatically increased 12 h later. The migration ability of SU3 cells was significantly higher than that of U251s or U251d cells (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Primary culture of the SU3 glioma stem cell line and its growth features (original magnification, ×200).

Figure 1.

A, fresh tumor tissues were dissociated into single cell suspension, cultured in serum-free conditions, and tumor spheres were formed 7 days later. B, in contrast, cells were adherent when cultured in serum condition containing 10% FBS. Tumor spheres reflected brightly, and differentiated tumor cells exhibited astroid, fusiform, or irregular morphologies (A and B). C-F: immunostaining of SU3. Tumor stem cells were positive for CD133 (C), and differentiated tumor cells were positive for nestin (D), GFAP (E), and β-tubulin III (F).

Figure 2. In vitro invasion assay of SU3s and its differentiated cells (scratch test, original magnification, ×100).

Figure 2.

U251s was single cell suspension of tumorspheres derived from U251 cells cultured in stem cell conditions. U251d and SU3d were differentiated cells of 11251s and SU3s, respectively. Results showed that all cells migrated into the scratch after 6 h, and this migration was most obvious after 12 h. However, the migration ability of SU3s and SU3d were higher than that of U251s or U251d.

In the in vivo experiments, tumor-bearing mice typically experienced cancer cachexia 30 days after cell inoculation at the right caudate nucleus. Anatomical dissection showed that the tumor invaded into the skull inner plate, whole right hemisphere and whole olfactory lobe. Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed darkly stained tumor cells with visibly deformed nuclei that were densely distributed and stretched toward normal brain tissue in a chicken feet pattern (Figure 3). These results suggest that SU3 is a highly invasive tumor cell line with severe grade malignancy.

Figure 3. In vivo invasiveness assay of SU3.

Figure 3.

SU3 cells were injected into the mouse brain, and tumor cells grew invasively from the injection site (right caudate nucleus) to the surrounding areas, including the inner plate of the skull (A) and the surface of frontal lobe (B). C, hematoxylin and eosin staining shows anachromasis and reveals that tumor cells stretched into the normal brain tissue like chicken feet (original magnification, ×100).

To determine the molecular basis of the observed invasiveness, SU3- and U251s-transplanted tumor tissues were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis to detect the expression of MMP2, MMP9, and Ki-67 proteins. The results indicated that SU3-transplanted tumor tissues expressed these proteins at significantly higher levels than did U251s tumor tissues (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Expression of molecular markers of invasion and proliferation in transplanted tumors (original magnification, ×100).

Figure 4.

Tissue of SU3-transplanted tumors highly express invasion markers MMP2 and MMP9, and proliferation marker Ki-67 (first column). Tissue of U251s-transplanted tumors express MMP2, MMP9 and Ki-67 as well, but the expression is weak (second column). Normal mouse brain tissue is negative for MMP2, MMP9, and Ki-67 (third column).

In vitro expression of miR-125b and MMP9

To investigate whether the invasiveness of glioma stem cells and progenitors is correlated with the overexpression of miR-125b and MMP9 (MMP2 was not included because the PCR results were not stable), we performed real-time PCR on SU3 spheres, U251s, and SU2, a GSCP cell line previously confirmed as highly invasive. The results showed that SU3 and SU2 cells had significantly higher levels of miR-125b than did U251s control cells (Figure 5A). Likewise, the concentration of MMP9 in SU3 and SU2 cells was elevated compared to U251s cells. The level of MMP9 was significantly higher in SU2 cells than in U251s cells (Figure 5B). MMP9 levels were not significantly different between SU3 and U251s cells, possibly due to small sample size; however, the absolute value of MMP9 increased by 5-fold, which is a significant increase in SU3 cells.

Figure 5. Levels of miR-125b and MMP9 in SU2, SU3, and U251s cells detected with real-time PCR.

Figure 5.

The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to analyze the relative changes in gene expression. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed with ANOVA, followed by Student-Newman-Keuls analysis. Data were converted to graph using Prism 4. A, the level of miR-125b was significantly higher in SU2 and SU3 cells than in U251s cells (P < 0.01, P < 0.05); B, compared to U251s cells, SU2 cells exhibited significantly higher expression of MMP9 (P < 0.05); no significant difference is observed between SU3 and 11251s cells.

Discussion

GSCP cell line SU2, which presents highly invasive characteristics and has been consecutively passaged for more than 2 years, was successfully generated by us from a biopsy sample collected 5 years ago from a patient with recurrent malignant glioma[5],[8]. However, whether the highly invasive SU2 cell line established by long-term passage in vitro is stable remains to be elucidated. Thus, we newly established SU3 cell line in this study. Our results confirmed the high invasiveness of SU3 cells in vitro and in vivo by comparison with the vigorously proliferative but lowly invasive cancer stem cell line U251s [9]. We then aimed to analyze the mechanism underlying the high invasiveness of SU3 cells.

miRNAs are stable, non-coding, small RNAs that play a role in cellular processes including differentiation, apoptosis, and metabolism via post-transcriptional regulation of target gene expression[10]. Unbalanced regulation of miRNAs may lead to tumor occurrence[11]. Benard et al.[12] reported that specific miRNAs can induce tumorigenesis and resistance to apoptosis in glioma cases. Chan et al.[13] found that the expression of miR-21 was significantly up-regulated in human gliomas, and blocking miR-21 expression markedly reduced proliferation ability. Ciafre et al.[14] found that miR-221 was significantly up-regulated in both glioma cells and tissues, whereas the miR-181 family was down-regulated. Dews et al.[15] revealed that the up-regulation of certain miRNAs was closely correlated with the tumor angiogenesis; however, whether the abundant blood supply network in malignant glioma cases is correlated with miRNAs remains unknown. Shi et al. [16] noted that low expression of miR-181a, miR-181b, and miR-181c was detected in glioma tissues. Thus, miRNAs have been suggested to have differing roles in gliomas.

miR-125b, which was used in this study, is a miRNA mainly accumulated in cerebral tissues[17]. Currently, study outcomes regarding the function of miR-125b are divergent. Ciafre et al.[14] reported that the expression level of miR-125b in malignant glioma tissue was higher than that in normal brain tissue. Xia et al.[18] found that the overexpression of miR-125b accelerated the proliferation of glioma cells and inhibited retinoic acid-induced apoptosis. Le et al.[19] suggested that overexpression of miR-125b suppressed the expression of tumor suppressor gene p53 and blocked p53-mediated apoptosis. These re suits seemingly indicate that miR-125b functions as an Oncogene. However, Shi et al.[20] showed that the up-regulation of miR-125b inhibited the proliferation of U251 stem cells, probably playing the role of a tumor suppressor gene. Our results showed that the expression of miR-125b in highly invasive SU3 and SU2 cells was significantly higher than that in U251s and U251d cells, suggesting that the high expression of miR-125b was consistent with the malignancy grade of tumor cells. Although inconsistent with the results reported by Shi et al.[20], our findings are in accord with those reported by Ciafre et al.[14], Xia et al.[18] and Le et al.[19], as well as Klusmann et al.[21] who reported that miR-125b played a role in accelerating the progression of leukemia.

Recent studies revealed that miR-125b has multiple target genes, including p53[19], TNF-α[22], Bmf[18], and DICER1 and ST18 [21]. No studies focusing on whether miR-125b regulates the expression of MMP9, which is related to invasiveness of tumor cells, have been reported. In this study, we detected high levels of both miR-125b and MMP9 in highly invasive SU3 and SU2 cells, indicating that miR-125b may regulate the invasiveness of cancer cells by mediating the expression of MMP9.

Currently, miRNA-related studies mainly focus on tumor tissues and cancer cell lines. However, few studies explore stem cells, which play an important role in the occurrence and progression of tumors. Although we detected highly expressed miR-125b and MMP9 in SU2 and SU3 cells with real-time PCR, these results must also be validated at the protein level. In addition, the expression of miR-125b should be inhibited using a knockout approach to determine whether miR-125b plays a role similar to an Oncogene in the occurrence and progression of cancer. Furthermore, studies are needed to identify whether the miR-125b effects occur during the stem cell stage or the differentiation stages.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 81172400, 81000963), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (NO.BK2011341), and the Natural Science Foundation of Suzhou (NO.SYS201063, SYS201161).

References

  • 1.Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, et al. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001;414:105–111. doi: 10.1038/35102167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63:5821–5828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang Q, Dong J, Zhang QB. Brain tumor stem cells. In: Huang Q, Dong J, Wang ZM, editors. Neuro-oncology. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House Press; 2011. pp. 2–31. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Huang Q, Xu GD, Du ZW, et al. Reproduction of NC nude mice and application. Shanghai Shiyan Dongwu Kexue. 1987;7:153–155. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang Q, Zhang QB, Dong J, et al. Glioma stem cells are more aggressive in recurrent tumors with malignant progression than in the primary tumor, and both can be maintained longterm in vitro. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:304. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang JP, Huang Q, Zhang QB, et al. Isolation and preliminary identification of brain tumor stem cells in human glioma cell line SHG-44. Chin J Clin Oncol. 2005;32:604–606, 610. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C (T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu YY, Huang Q, Dong J, et al. Biological characterization of primary and recurrent brain tumor stem cells. Chin J Neuro. 2009;25:750–752. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Molina JR, Hayashi Y, Stephens C, et al. Invasive glioblastoma cells acquire sternness and increased Akt activation. Neoplasia. 2010;12:453–463. doi: 10.1593/neo.10126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rupaimoole R, Han HD, Lopez-Berestein G, et al. MicroRNA therapeutics: principles, expectations, and challenges. Chin J Cancer. 2011;30:368–370. doi: 10.5732/cjc.011.10186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ling H, Zhang W, Calin G. Principles of microRNA involvement in human cancers. Chin J Cancer. 2011;30:739–748. doi: 10.5732/cjc.011.10243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Benard J, Douc-Rasy S. Micro-RNA and oncogenesis. Bull Cancer. 2005;92:757–762. [in French] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-21 is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6029–6033. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ciafrè SA, Galardi S, Mangiola A, et al. Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;334:1351–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dews M, Homayouni A, Yu D, et al. Augmentation of tumor angiogenesis by a Myc-activated microRNA cluster. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1060–1065. doi: 10.1038/ng1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shi L, Cheng Z, Zhang J, et al. hsa-mir-181a and hsa-mir-181b function as tumor suppressors in human glioma cells. Brain Res. 2008;1236:185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smirnova L, Grafe A, Seiler A, et al. Regulation of miRNA expression during neural cell specification. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:1469–1477. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xia HF, He TZ, Liu CM, et al. MiR-125b expression affects the proliferation and apoptosis of human glioma cells by targeting Bmf. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2009;23:347–358. doi: 10.1159/000218181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Le MT, Teh C, Shyh-Chang N, et al. MicroRNA-125b is a novel negative regulator of p53. Genes Dev. 2009;23:862–876. doi: 10.1101/gad.1767609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shi L, Zhang J, Pan T, et al. MiR-125b is critical for the suppression of human U251 glioma stem cell proliferation. Brain Res. 2010;1312:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Klusmann JH, Li Z, Koch ML, et al. miR-125b-2 is a potential oncomiR on human chromosome 21 in megakaryoblastic leukemia. Genes Dev. 2010;24:478–490. doi: 10.1101/gad.1856210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tili E, Michaille JJ, Cimino A, et al. Modulation of miR-155 and miR-125b levels following lipopolysaccharide/TNF-alpha stimulation and their possible roles in regulating the response to endotoxin shock. J Immunol. 2007;179:5082–5089. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES