Skip to main content
Chinese Journal of Cancer logoLink to Chinese Journal of Cancer
. 2012 Jun;31(6):281–286. doi: 10.5732/cjc.011.10390

Epidemiologic differences in esophageal cancer between Asian and Western populations

Han-Ze Zhang 1, Guang-Fu Jin 1, Hong-Bing Shen 1
PMCID: PMC3777490  PMID: 22507220

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is a common cancer worldwide and has a poor prognosis. The incidence of esophageal squamous cell cancer has been decreasing, whereas the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has been increasing rapidly, particularly in Western men. Squamous cell cancer continues to be the major type of esophageal cancer in Asia, and the main risk factors include tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, hot beverage drinking, and poor nutrition. In contrast, esophageal adenocarcinoma predominately affects the whites, and the risk factors include smoking, obesity, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. In addition, Asians and Caucasians may have different susceptibilities to esophageal cancer due to different heritage backgrounds. However, comparison studies between these two populations are limited and need to be addressed in the near future. Ethnic differences should be taken into account in preventive and clinical practices.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer, epidemiology, molecular epidemiology, ethnicity


Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer around the world. In 2008, an estimated 482 000 new esophageal cancer cases were diagnosed and 407 000 related deaths occurred globally[1]. There is an obvious difference in esophageal cancer incidence between men and women. For men, the incidence is 2–4 times higher than that for women. Esophageal cancer incidence and mortality are also affected by geography. Eastern Asia and eastern and southern Africa have the highest rates, whereas Europe and North America show lower rates. In males, the highest incidence of esophageal cancer is observed in southern Africa [age-standard rate (ASR): 22.3 per 100 000], eastern Asia (ASR: 20.3 per 100 000), and eastern Africa (ASR: 14.9 per 100 000). Similarly, these areas are also sites of the highest incidence among females.

Epidemiology of Esophageal Cancer in Asian and Western Countries

Esophageal cancer has two main histological types: esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs), which occur in the middle or upper one-third of the esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs), which occur in the lower one-third of the esophagus or in the junction of the esophagus and stomach[2],[3]. These two types differ in many aspects, including incidence, mortality, risk factors, clinical features, genetic susceptibility, and pathogenesis. The incidence of ESCC has been declining over the past decades, whereas the incidence of EAC continues to increase. Approximately half of esophageal cancer cases are EAC in some Western countries, such as the United States[4]. In contrast, ESCC continues to be the dominant type in other areas of the world, especially in Asia.

ESCC

Marked difference in incidence of ESCC among countries or ethnicities is an epidemiologic characteristic of ESCC. The high-risk areas for ESCC include South America and the “Asian Esophageal Cancer Belt,” which extends from eastern Turkey, through Iraq, Iran, and the southern part of the former Soviet Union (Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan) to Mongolia and western/northern China[5]. ESCC is the major type of esophageal cancer in Asia, especially in China. More than half of global ESCC cases occur in China, including the high-incidence areas of Linxian in Henan Province, Cixian in Hebei Province, and Huai'an in Jiangsu Province[6][8].

ESCC incidence continues to decrease in the United States, partly because of the decrease in tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption[9]. More than 90% of ESCC cases are attributed to alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking in the United States, and other Western countries[10],[11]. In Asia, ESCC incidence has declined in past decades because of socioeconomic level elevation and lifestyle modification, but ESCC is still a significant health burden[12]. Tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption are also the main risk factors for ESCC in Asia. ESCC risk has been reported to increase by 3- to 7-fold in current smokers[12]. Other risk factors include drinking hot beverage, family cancer history[13], poor nutrition such as lack of fruit and vegetables in the diet, mechanical injuries, and opium use, with estimated risk ratios (RR) or odds ratios (OR) up to 2.5[14][17]. In Linxian, China and Golestan, Iran, the incidence of ESCC is similar among males and females; however, in other regions across Asia, this trend is different: the incidence for males is higher than that for females[18],[19]. In these areas, the proportions of smokers and drinkers are very low for women[20], suggesting a minor role of smoking and drinking in ESCC. It is likely that other risk factors may exist in these high-risk areas that account for the majority of ESCC cases, but the exact factors are still not well understood.

EAC

The incidence of EAC is increasing in many countries. In the United States, it is rising more rapidly than any other cancer, causing EAC to be named as “an emerging disease”[21]. The incidence of EAC increased by approximately 6-fold from 1975 to 2000[21]. EAC incidence is also increasing in other developed areas and countries around the world, including the United Kingdom and Denmark[22],[23]. In China, an increasing trend was also reported in both urban and rural areas[24]. Furthermore, EAC is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and has a 5-year survival rate of less than 20%[25].

The sharp increase of EAC incidence in the United States and other Western countries is due in part to the increasing prevalence of known risk factors such as being overweight or obese[26]. A meta-analysis including 14 studies showed that EAC risk increased by more than 2-fold in overweight and obese individuals[27]. Another major risk factor for EAC is gastroesophageal reflux disease, which is also increasing in frequency, and its sequela, Barrett's esophagus. One case-control study reported that among persons with recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease, as compared with persons without such symptoms, the OR was 7.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3 to 11.4] for EAC[27]. The increasing incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease may be linked to changes in lifestyle and dietary habits. In Barrett's esophagus, the squamous epithelium damaged by reflux esophagitis is replaced by a metaplastic, columnar epithelium, which has a malignant predisposition[28]. Other suggested risk factors for EAC include family cancer history (OR = 1.74)[29]. H. pylori infection is hypothesized to be protective against EAC because it reduces acidity in the stomach and thereby reduces esophageal damage from reflux[26]. In the past few decades in the United States, advances in sanitation and the widespread use of antibiotics have led to a decline in the prevalence of H. pylori colonization, which may be associated with the recent increase in EAC incidence. The increasing incidence of EAC in China may be due to increased tobacco consumption, which is another important risk factor for EAC[26]. In some areas in China, unhealthy diet, such as pickled vegetables and moldy or fermented foods, has been associated with increased risk of EAC[30].

Molecular Epidemiology of Esophageal Cancer in Asian and Western Countries

Environmental and behavioral factors may increase the risk of esophageal cancer. However, only a small fraction of individuals with risk factors ultimately develop esophageal cancer[31]. Therefore, genetic susceptibility may play an important role in esophageal cancer development. Immigrant epidemiology studies have supported that genetic factors are important components affecting esophageal cancer risk[32],[33]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common genetic polymorphisms, accounting for a large proportion of genetic variations in the human genome[34]. SNPs may influence the risks, outcomes, and responses to particular therapeutic interventions of certain diseases. The identification of genetic markers for esophageal cancer may be useful for high-risk population screening, early detection, and predicting drug response/prognosis, thus allowing for early diagnosis and personalized medicine in the future.

Genome-wide association studies for esophageal cancer

Over last several years, genome-wide association studies have successfully identified hundreds of genetic polymorphisms reproducibly associated with diverse complex diseases and traits, including cancers[34]. Recently, four ESCC genome-wide association studies were reported, all of which were conducted in Asian populations (three in the Chinese Han population and one in a Japanese population)[35][38]. The first genome-wide association study of ESCC performed in Japanese individuals revealed two functional SNPs in alcohol dehydrogenase 1B (ADH1B) (rs1229984, OR = 1.79) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 family (ALDH2) (rs671, OR = 1.67), which encode metabolic enzymes for alcohol and carcinogens associated with altered ESCC risk. This study also reported gene-environmental interactions of rs671 with alcohol drinking and smoking, and found a similar link between SNP rs1229984 and alcohol drinking[35]. In 2010, two genome-wide association studies in Chinese populations identified two additional susceptibility loci [rs2274223 in phospholipase C, epsilon 1 (PLCE1) and rs13042395 in chromosome 20 open reading frame (C20orf54)] for ESCC[36],[37]. More recently, a larger genome-wide association study (2043 cases and 2063 controls) on ESCC performed in Chinese Han individuals revealed three new SNPs, rs10052657 in phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D) (OR = 0.33), rs2014300 in runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) (OR = 0.62), and rs10484761 near to unc-5 homolog C (C. elegans)-like (UNC5CL) (OR = 1.77), to be associated with ESCC risk at significant level[38]. This study reported that three variants (rs11066105, rs11066280, and rs2074356) in strong linkage disequilibrium on 12q24 conferred risk to ESCC in a gene-environmental interaction manner, with increased risk in tobacco and alcohol users[38]. Despite the increasing use of genome-wide association studies, none has been reported for esophageal cancer in Western populations or for EAC in Asian or Western populations.

Genetic susceptibility for ESCC

The tumorigenesis of esophageal squamous cells involves genes that encode regulators of diverse cellular processes, including alcohol metabolism [e.g., ALDH2 and alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (ADH2)], folate metabolism [e.g., thymidylate synthase (TS) and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR)], DNA repair [e.g., X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 1 (XRCC1), xeroderma pigmentosum, complementation group C (XPC), and xeroderma pigmentosum D (XPD)], cell cycle control [e. g., tumor protein p53 (TP53) and cyclin D1 (CCND1)], apoptosis (e.g., FAS), inflammation [e.g., cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COX2)], and carcinogen metabolism. These genes also include those encoding phase I enzymes (e.g., CYP genes) and phase II enzymes (e.g., GST genes) that contribute to either carcinogen activation or detoxification[39],[40]. In the past decade, dozens of genetic variants of these genes were identified via candidate gene approaches to be associated with ESCC[39],[40]. Notably, the majority of these molecular epidemiologic studies have been conducted in Asian countries, such as China and Japan, because of the high ESCC incidence there. Studies in Western populations are relatively rare.

Genetic susceptibility for EAC

In contrast to ESCC, there have been only limited studies focused on EAC susceptibility. However, with the increasing incidence of EAC, epidemiologists and other researchers have started to better investigate this type of esophageal cancer, primarily in North American and European populations. In these studies, variants of genes encoding phase I and II enzymes [e.g., glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1), glutathione S-transferase pi 1 (GSTP1), and glutathione S-trans-ferase mu 3 (GSTM3)], DNA repair genes [e.g., XRCC1, excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 (ERCC1), XPC, and XPD], and cell cycle control (e.g., TP53, TP73, and CCND1)[39],[40] were linked to EAC susceptibility. SNPs in other genes, such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene[41], were also reported to be associated with susceptibility for EAC in Western populations. The association studies for EAC in Asian population are scarce. The only study conducted in an Indian population revealed that GSTM3 polymorphism might modulate the risk of EAC[42], but the sample size was very small.

Prognosis and Survival of Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Current treatments for esophageal cancer mainly include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of these modalities. The location and size of the tumor, presence or absence of metastases, cell type, and patient goals are all factors for formulating a treatment plan. Nevertheless, after reviewing the literature, Wong et al.[43] reported that the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy before surgery provides more benefit than radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone for localized disease.

There are substantial differences in the clinical features and prognosis of ESCC and EAC. Compared to those with ESCC, patients with EAC may have more advanced tumors, as well as a higher percentage of invaded lymph nodes, shorter time until resumption of feeding, shorter hospital stay, higher diffuse recurrence rate, and lower incidence of tobacco-related second primary tumors[44]. In addition, some studies have also reported that ESCC is less likely to have early regional lymph node dissemination and distant relapse than EAC[44][46]. For clinical therapy, radiotherapy alone has been used for inoperable squamous cell carcinomas in the past; however, it showed little effect on the relatively radioinsensitive adenocarcinomas[47]. On the contrary, patients with EAC benefit more from neoadjuvant chemotherapy than do those with ESCC. In summary, different clinical and histological characteristics between ESCC and EAC justify a differential therapeutic approach and result in distinct clinical outcomes.

Despite the improvement of local treatments, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined modalities, the overall survival rate for patients with esophageal cancer is still very low, with a range of 10% to 15%[48]. Several epidemiologic studies suggested that gender may be an intervening factor for esophageal cancer: women with esophageal cancer tend to have a better prognosis than do men[49]. However, patients with the same clinical features and treatments may have different clinical outcomes, indicating genetic variants may play an important role in esophageal cancer prognosis. Researchers sought to use personal genetic information in combination with clinical information to provide patients with esophageal cancer the best personalized supportive care and therapy. Similar to studies on esophageal cancer risk, studies on esophageal cancer prognosis can also be divided into two types by using histology and ethnicity: associations between SNPs and ESCC prognosis in Asian populations and associations between SNPs and EAC prognosis in Western populations. On one hand, SNPs from different pathways, including the xenobiotic metabolism pathway (e.g., GSTT1 and GSTM1)[50],[51] and the folate pathway (e.g., TS and MTHFR)[52][54], have been reported to influence the outcome of ESCC in Asian populations, such as Chinese and Japanese. Researchers also found that genetic variants in MTHFR, TS, and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR) might contribute to ESCC prognosis in German populations[55]. On the other hand, for EAC prognosis, DNA repair pathways (e.g., XRCC1) have received much attention because cisplatin is routinely used in EAC chemotherapy[56]. The association between EAC outcomes and polymorphic variants on other pathways, including the inflammatory pathway [e.g., interleukin 1 beta (IL1B) and interleukin 6 (IL6)][55] and the folate pathway (e.g., TS and MTHFR)[54],[56], have also been evaluated in Western populations. However, knowledge regarding genetic variants and esophageal cancer prognosis is still limited.

Conclusions

In terms of traditional epidemiology (incidence, demographics, histology, and risk factors) and molecular epidemiology (genetic susceptibility and sensitivity to treatments), esophageal cancer has distinct characteristics in Asian and Western populations. The ethnic and histological differences should be considered in future studies and clinical practices. Hence, Asian studies should focus more attention on EAC. Future molecular epidemiologic studies would be helpful in identifying high-risk populations, performing early screening and diagnosis, and guiding clinically personalized therapy for esophageal cancer.

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jemal A, Center MM, Desantis C, et al. et al. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1893–1907. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al. et al. 3rd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. International classification of diseases for oncology. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown LM, Devesa SS. Epidemiologic trends in esophageal and gastric cancer in the United States. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2002;11:235–256. doi: 10.1016/s1055-3207(02)00002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reed PI, Johnston BJ. The changing incidence of oesophageal cancer. Endoscopy. 1993;25:606–608. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tran GD, Sun XD, Abnet CC, et al. et al. Prospective study of risk factors for esophageal and gastric cancers in the Linxian general population trial cohort in China. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:456–463. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Muñoz N, Crespi M, Grassi A, et al. et al. Precursor lesions of oesophageal cancer in high-risk populations in Iran and China. Lancet. 1982;1:876–879. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92151-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blot WJ, Li JY, Taylor PR, et al. et al. The Linxian trials: mortality rates by vitamin-mineral intervention group. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;62:1424S–1426S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/62.6.1424S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cook MB, Chow WH, Devesa SS. Oesophageal cancer incidence in the United States by race, sex, and histologic type, 1977–2005. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:855–859. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sankaranarayanan R, Swaminathan R, Brenner H, et al. et al. Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and Central America: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:165–173. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70335-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, et al. et al. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD) Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:730–756. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70179-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kamangar F, Chow WH, Abnet CC, et al. et al. Environmental causes of esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2009;38:27–57, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tran GD, Sun XD, Abnet CC, et al. Prospective study of risk factors for esophageal and gastric cancers in the Linxian general population trial cohort in China. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:456–463. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Islami F, Boffetta P, Ren JS, et al. et al. High-temperature beverages and foods and esophageal cancer risk—a systematic review. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:491–524. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Islami F, Pourshams A, Nasrollahzadeh D, et al. et al. Tea drinking habits and oesophageal cancer in a high risk area in northern Iran: population based case-control study. BMJ. 2009;338:b929. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fan Y, Yuan JM, Wang R, et al. et al. Alcohol, tobacco, and diet in relation to esophageal cancer: the Shanghai cohort study. Nutr Cancer. 2008;60:354–363. doi: 10.1080/01635580701883011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nasrollahzadeh D, Kamangar F, Aghcheli K, et al. et al. Opium, tobacco, and alcohol use in relation to oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a high-risk area of Iran. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:1857–1863. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sankaranarayanan R, Black RJ, Parkin DM. Lyon (France): IARC Scientific Publications; 1999. Cancer survival in developing countries; p. 145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sant M, Allemani C, Santaquilani M, et al. et al. EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentary. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:931–991. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–1371. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–146. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lepage C, Rachet B, Jooste V, et al. et al. Continuing rapid increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma in England and Wales. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2694–2699. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Post PN, Siersema PD, Van Dekken H. Rising incidence of clinically evident Barrett's oesophagus in the Netherlands: a nation-wide registry of pathology reports. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:17–22. doi: 10.1080/00365520600815654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fan YJ, Song X, Li JL, et al. et al. Esophageal and gastric cardia cancers on 4238 Chinese patients residing in municipal and rural regions: a histopathological comparison during 24-year period. World J Surg. 2008;32:1980–1988. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9674-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Holmes R.S, Vaughan TL. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of esophageal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:2–9. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kubo A, Corley DA. Body mass index and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or gastric cardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:872–878. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, et al. et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:825–831. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903183401101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Spechler SJ. Clinical practice. Barrett's esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:836–842. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp012118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dhillon PK, Farrow DC, Vaughan TL, et al. Family history of cancer and risk of esophageal and gastric cancers in the United States. Int J Cancer. 2001;93:148–152. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Islami F, Ren JS, Taylor PR, et al. et al. Pickled vegetables and the risk of oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1641–1647. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maley CC, Reid BJ. Natural selection in neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15:474–483. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stellman SD, Wang QS. Cancer mortality in Chinese immigrants to New York City. Comparison with Chinese in Tianjin and with United States-born whites. Cancer. 1994;73:1270–1275. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940215)73:4<1270::aid-cncr2820730423>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gomez SL, Le GM, Clarke CA, et al. et al. Cancer incidence patterns in Koreans in the US and in Kangwha, South Korea. Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:167–174. doi: 10.1023/a:1023046121214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Manolio TA. Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:166–176. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0905980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cui R, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, et al. et al. Functional variants in ADH1B and ALDH2 coupled with alcohol a smoking synergistically enhance esophageal cancer risk. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:1768–1775. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang LD, Zhou FY, Li XM, et al. et al. Genome-wide association study of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese subjects identifes susceptibility loci at PLCE1 and C20orf54. Nat Genet. 2010;42:759–763. doi: 10.1038/ng.648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abnet CC, Freedman ND, Hu N, et al. et al. A shared susceptibility locus in PLCE1 at 10q23 for gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2010;42:764–767. doi: 10.1038/ng.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu C, Hu Z, He Z, et al. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies three new susceptibility loci for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in Chinese populations. Nat Genet. 2011;43:679–684. doi: 10.1038/ng.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cheung WY, Liu G. Genetic variations in esophageal cancer risk and prognosis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2009;38:75–91. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, et al. et al. Genetic polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:1643–1658. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu CY, Wu MC, Chen F, et al. et al. A Large-scale genetic association study of esophageal adenocarcinoma risk. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1259–1263. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jain M, Kumar S, Lal P, et al. et al. Role of GSTM3 polymorphism in the risk of developing esophageal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:178–181. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wong R, Malthaner R. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (without surgery) compared with radiotherapy alone in localized carcinoma of the esophagus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:CD002092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mariette C, Finzi L, Piessen G, et al. et al. Esophageal carcinoma: prognostic differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2005;29:39–45. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7542-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Siewert JR, Ott K. Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease? Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M, et al. et al. Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world. Ann Surg. 2001;234:360–367. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Whiteman DC, Sadeghi S, Pandeya N, et al. et al. Combined effects of obesity, acid reflux and smoking on the risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus. Gut. 2008;57:173–180. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.131375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Crane SJ, Locke GR, 3rd, Harmsen WS, et al. et al. Survival trends in patients with gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas: a population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:1087–1094. doi: 10.4065/83.10.1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shimada Y, Imamura M, Watanabe G, et al. et al. Prognostic factors of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the perspective of molecular biology. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1281–12888. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6990499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Okuno T, Tamura T, Yamamori M, et al. et al. Favorable genetic polymorphisms predictive of clinical outcome of chemo-radiotherapy for stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30:252–257. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000256059.88247.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lee JM, Wu MT, Lee YC, et al. et al. Association of GSTP1 polymorphism and survival for esophageal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:4749–4753. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang J, Cui Y, Kuang G, et al. et al. Association of the thymidylate synthase polymorphisms with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:2479–2485. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sarbia M, Stahl M, von Weyhern C, et al. et al. The prognostic significance of genetic polymorphisms (methylenetetra-hydrofolate reductase C677 T, methionine synthase A2756 G, thymidilate synthase tandem repeat polymorphism) in multimodally treated oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:203–207. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu X, Gu J, Wu TT, et al. et al. Genetic variations in radiation and chemotherapy drug action pathways predict clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3789–3798. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Deans DA, Wigmore SJ, Gilmour H, et al. et al. Elevated tumour interleukin-1beta is associated with systemic inflammation: a marker of reduced survival in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1568–1575. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liao Z, Liu H, Swisher SG, et al. et al. Polymorphism at the 3′-UTR of the thymidylate synthase gene: a potential predictor for outcomes in Caucasian patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:700–708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of AAAS Science Partner Journal Program

RESOURCES