Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is among the most common malignancies in southern China. Deletion of genomic DNA, which occurs during the complex pathogenesis process for NPC, represents a pivotal mechanism in the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs). In many circumstances, loss of TSGs can be detected as diagnostic and prognostic markers in cancer. The short arm of chromosome 3 (3p) is a frequently deleted chromosomal region in NPC, with 3p21.1–21.2 and 3p25.2–26.1 being the most frequently deleted minimal regions. In recent years, our research group and others have focused on the identification and characterization of novel target TSGs at 3p, such as RASSF1A, BLU, RBMS3, and CHL1, in the development and progression of NPC. In this review, we summarize recent findings of TSGs at 3p and discuss some of these genes in detail. A better understanding of TSGs at 3p will significantly improve our understanding of NPC pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.
Keywords: Tumor suppressor gene, deletion of 3p, nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common head and neck malignancy in Southeast Asia, especially in southern China where it reaches a peak incidence of 20 to 30 cases per 100 000 people[1],[2], but is rare in Europe and North America[3]. Several etiologic factors have been associated with NPC, including early infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), genetic predisposition, chemical carcinogens in some traditional diets (particularly salted fish)[4], and exposure to noxious inhalants[5]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, NPC is classified as keratinizing or nonkeratinizing. The latter includes poorly differentiated (WHO type II) and undifferentiated (WHO type III) nonkeratinizing carcinoma. Poorly differentiated nonkeratinizing carcinoma is more common in southern China, accounting for more than 97% of NPC cases[6]. This NPC epidemic also shows familial aggregation; the risk of NPC is more than 9 times as high in first-degree relatives of the patient compared to first-degree relatives of the spouse[7]. The majority (75% to 90%) of newly diagnosed NPC patients have loco-regionally advanced disease, commonly with cervical nodal metastases[8], indicating that most NPC patients are not promptly diagnosed.
Recurrent Genetic Alterations in NPC
Although several factors including EBV infection, environmental risks, and genetic susceptibility have been associated with NPC[9]-[12], the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of NPC remain unclear. Cytogenetic studies have shown that multiple chromosomal abnormalities were frequently detected in individual cases, suggesting that genomic instability might play an important role in NPC pathogenesis[13],[14]. During last two decades, the importance of chromosomal aberrations in the pathogenesis of cancer has been widely elucidated. Like most cancers, NPC is a heterogeneous disease with complex genetic changes. Therefore, identifying and characterizing recurrent genomic alterations is a useful strategy to explore genes involved in the development and progression of NPC. In Table 1, we summarized the recurrent genomic changes in NPC detected by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) studies. These genomic alterations include gains of 1q, 2q, 3q, 4q, 5q, 6q, 7q, 8, 11q, 12, and 17q and losses of 1p, 3p, 9p, 9q, 11q, 13q, 14q, and 16q[15]-[21]. Among these chromosomal abnormalities, 3p is the most frequently deleted region (Figure 1), implying that 3p may harbor one or more TSGs. In addition, loss of 3p has been detected as an early and critical molecular event in the pathogenesis of NPC[22]-[24], and has been associated with a significantly higher risk of death from recurrent tumor compared with patients without 3p loss[24].
Table 1. Summary of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
| Chromosomal alteration | Prevalence of chromosomal alteration reported in literature |
||||||
| Ref. [15] (n=51) | Ref. [16] (n=20) | Ref. [17] (n=47) | Ref. [18] (n=30) | Ref. [19] (n=10) | Ref. [20] (n=17) | Ref. [21] (n=10) | |
| Gains | |||||||
| 1q | 47% | 40% | 32% | 20% | 60% | 35% | 80% |
| 2q | - | 20% | - | 23% | 50% | 29% | 20% |
| 3q | - | 30% | 34% | 20% | 70% | 29% | 30% |
| 4q | 20% | 17% | - | - | - | 59% | - |
| 6q | - | 25% | - | 13% | 50% | - | - |
| 7q | - | 20% | - | 13% | 40% | - | 10% |
| 8p | - | 30% | - | 10% | - | - | - |
| 8q | - | 30% | - | 27% | 60% | 29% | 10% |
| 11q | 41% | - | - | - | 80% | 35% | 20% |
| 12p | 59% | 60% | - | 36% | - | - | 40% |
| 12q | 35% | 60% | 51% | 33% | 80% | 41% | 10% |
| 17q | 47% | 10% | - | - | 60% | - | - |
| Losses | |||||||
| 1p | - | 30% | 43% | - | - | 82% | 20% |
| 3p | 53% | 75% | 43% | 20% | 50% | 53% | 40% |
| 9p | 41% | 25% | - | - | 50% | - | 20% |
| 9q | - | 40% | - | - | - | 29% | 10% |
| 11q | 29% | 45% | 36% | 23% | 80% | 47% | 40% |
| 13q | 41% | 35% | - | - | - | 35% | 40% |
| 14q | 35% | 65% | 21% | 13% | 50% | 47% | 40% |
| 16q | - | 50% | 55% | 16% | - | 29% | 10% |
“-” refers to undetectable.
Figure 1. Summary of genomic deletions in 185 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases.
Deletion of 3p is the most frequently detected chromosomal alteration.
Frequently Deleted Minimal Regions at 3p in Human Cancers
By using CGH, scientists have demonstrated that copy number loss of chromosome 3p is a frequent alteration in NPC and has been suggested as an early genomic alteration during NPC progression. Using microsatellite markers, several frequently deleted minimal regions at 3p were identified in NPC, including 3p25.2–26.1 (51.3%), 3p21.1–21.2 (51.3%), 3p14.3–21.1 (48.7%), 3p21.3 (47.4%), and 3p26.2–26.3 (45%)[25],[26]. In lung cancer, several frequently deleted regions, including 3p26.3, 3p25.3, 3p24.1, 3p23, and 3p21.1, have been identified by SNP-MassArray[27]. Another loss of heterozygosity (LOH) study in lung cancer showed that frequently deleted regions at 3p include 3p24–26, 3p21.3, 3p21.1–21.2, 3p14.2, and 3p12–13[28]. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), deletion of 3p is also a frequent allelic imbalance detected by CGH[29]-[31], LOH[32], and genome-wide genotyping[33]. Using SNP-MassArray, several commonly deleted regions in ESCC have been identified, including 3p26.3, 3p22, 3p21.3, and 3p14.2[33]. Furthermore, deletions of 3p22 and 3p14.2 have been related with advanced tumor stage, and deletion of 3p22 was found to associate with tumor metastasis in ESCC[33]. In pancreatic endocrine tumor, deletion of 3p, especially at the 3p21.1–21.3 and 3p 25.2–26.1 regions, is a frequently detected genomic alteration in advanced stage disease[34]. These results suggest that frequently deleted regions may harbor one or more TSGs that play important roles in the pathogenesis of various solid malignancies, including NPC.
Identification of NPC-related TSGs at 3p
In human solid tumors, copy number alterations are believed to contribute to tumorigenesis by affecting the functions of cancer-related genes in altered chromosomal regions[35]. In NPC, isolating and identifying putative cancer-related TSGs will help us to understand its pathogenesis. During the last decade, several candidate TSGs at 3p21.3 have been identified and characterized, including RASSF1A [Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 1], GNAT1 [guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein), alpha transducing activity polypeptide 1], BLU (zinc finger, MYND-type containing 10), and LARS2 (leucyl-tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial), which are inactivated by promoter hypermethylation and/or LOH in NPC[36]-[40]. Several other TSGs at 3p have been identified, including NAG7 (long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 312) at 3p25[41], LTF (lactotransferrin) at 3p21[42],[43], FBLN2 (fibulin 2), TMEM45A (transmembrane protein 45A), ZIC4 (Zic family member 4), GPR149 (G protein-coupled receptor 149), and ETV5 (ets variant 5)[44]. Recently, in our laboratory, candidate TSGs CACNA2D3 (calcium channel, voltage-dependent, alpha 2/delta subunit 3) at 3p21.1, RBMS3 (RNA-binding motif, single stranded interacting protein 3) at 3p33, and CHL1 [cell adhesion molecule with homology to L1CAM (close homolog of L1)] at 3p26 have been identified (unpublished data) (Table 2).
Table 2. Candidate tumor suppressor genes at 3p in NPC.
| Gene | Location | Function(s) | Down-regulation | Reference(s) |
| CACNA2D3 | 3p21.1 | Cell proliferation; cell cycle regulation apoptosis; invasion and metastasis | 92.3% (12/13)a | Wong et al. (unpublished) |
| GNAT1 | 3p21.3 | Remains to be revealed | 72.7% (24/33) | Dryja et al.[44]; Yi et al.[45] |
| LTF | 3p21.3 | Cellular growth, differentiation, protection against cancer development and metastasis | 76% (25/33) | Yi et al.[46]; Zhang et al.[47]; Zhou et al.[48] |
| BLU | 3p21.3 | Cell proliferation; stress-responsive | 83% (24/29) | Liu et al.[51]; Agathanggelou[52]; Qiu et al.[53]; Yau et al.[54]; |
| LARS2 | 3p21.3 | Encodes a class 1 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase | 78% (28/36) | Zhou et al.[55] |
| RASSF1A | 3p21.3 | Cell proliferation; cell cycle regulation; apoptosis | 100% (38/38) | Wang et al.[56]; Hutajulu et al.[57]; Chow et al.[58] |
| RBMS3 | 3p24.1 | Cell proliferation; cell cycle regulation; apoptosis | 86.7% (13/15) | Chen et al. (unpublished) |
| FBLN2 | 3p25.1 | Cell proliferation; invasion; metastasis and angiogenesis | 46.7% (14/30) | Law et al.[39] |
| CHL1 | 3p26.1 | Cell proliferation; cell cycle regulation; apoptosis; invasion and metastasis | 80.0% (12/15) | Chen et al. (unpublished) |
a The percentage of NPC cases with lower expression of the target gene than their adjacent nontumor tissues (the sum of cases with lower target gene expression divided by the sum of NPC cases examined from all the relevant references).
Complex Progression of NPC Carcinogenesis
The development and progression of NPC is a complex process. EBV is a ubiquitous herpesvirus that preferentially infects oropharyngeal epithelial cells and B-lymphocytes in humans. The virus is present in all NPC tissues, which usually includes pre-invasive nasopharyngeal lesions[45],[46]. Little is known about the underlying reasons why EBV-infected epithelial cells undergo increased proliferation[47]. Recently, EBV was the first virus found to encode microRNAs (miRNAs), short, non-coding RNAs that in most cases negatively regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level and guide gene silencing[48]. The most widely accepted hypothesis of NPC development and progression involves a series of sequential steps. The process begins with transformation, which occurs in nasopharyngeal epithelium due to chronic EBV infection or triggering by external stimuli (chemical carcinogens, noxious inhalants, or metabolic diseases). Transformation is followed by a series of hyperplastic and dysplastic stages, and the disease progresses to become more malignant, making metastasis possible. The changes by which a normal cell becomes a cancer cell are thought to be caused by aberrant gene expression critical to cellular processes such as cell cycle control, apoptosis, cell adhesion, migration, and other functions at the genetic, molecular, and cellular levels. These altered cells may undergo clonal expansion and immortalization to develop NPC. Later on, neoplastic cells become more undifferentiated and invasive, and then spread out of the nasopharyngeal epithelium to the brain or other distant locations, which indicates end-stage disease.
Roles of TSGs at 3p during Nasopharyngeal Carcinogenesis
During human multiple complex nasopharyngeal carcinogenesis, DNA copy loss is a pivotal mechanism by which TSGs become inactivated. In many cases, deleted TSGs are identified as both prognostic markers and tumor therapy targets. In this review, we summarize the function of deleted 3p genes and describe in detail the role of novel candidate TSGs RBMS3 and CHL1 identified by our group.
GNAT1
GNAT1 stimulates the coupling of rhodopsin and cGMP-phoshodiesterase during visual impulses and encodes the alpha subunit in rods. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal dominant congenital stationary night blindness[49]. GNAT1 is expressed stably in all chronic nasopharyngitis tissues, whereas absent or down-regulated in specimens of NPC. LOH of GNAT1 was correlated to its expression level[50], whereas the functional role of GNAT1 remains to be revealed.
LTF
LTF, which belongs to the transferrin family, is a major iron-binding protein in milk and body secretions and has an antimicrobial activity, making it an important component of the non-specific immune system. This protein demonstrates a broad spectrum of properties, and two-hit silencing of this gene through genetic and epigenetic changes may be a common and important event in carcinogenesis. LTF inhibited NPC proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest and modulating the MAPK signaling pathway[50]-[52]. Studies also highlight the potential for LTF in chemoprevention and suggest that it may become a biologically relevant prognostic marker in prostate cancer[53] and lung cancer[54].
BLU
In 2003, Liu et al.[55] found that the BLU gene was frequently altered in NPCs; however, there was no evidence of a suppressive effect on NPC cell proliferation. Epigenetic inactivation of BLU has been strongly indicated in the pathogenesis of common human cancers and has been observed in the following: lung cancer (39%), breast cancer (42%), kidney cancer (50%), neuroblastoma (86%), and NPC cell lines (80%)[56]. BLU was also found to be activated by environmental stresses such as heat shock, which was regulated by E2F[39]. Furthermore, in vivo studies provided the first significant evidence to demonstrate that BLU could functionally suppress tumor formation. Taken together, these findings suggest that BLU is likely a candidate TSG involved in NPC[57].
LARS2
LARS2 encodes a class 1 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase. Hypermethylation of LARS2 was found in 64% of NPC samples but only in 12.5% of non-cancerous nasopharyngeal biopsies. Inactivation of LARS2 by both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms may be a common and important event in the carcinogenesis of NPC[58].
RASSF1A
RASSF1A, also named RASSF1, encodes a protein similar to the Ras effector proteins. Loss or altered expression of this gene, which is related with hypermethylation of its CpG island promoter region, has been associated with the pathogenesis of a variety of cancers, including NPC[59]-[62], prostates cancer[63], non-small cell lung cancer[64], and head and neck squamous cells cancer[65], suggesting this gene has a tumor suppressor function. In NPC, RASSF1A is one of the five specific methylation markers (RASSF1A, p16, WIF1, CHFR, and RIZ1) for NPC risk assessment in combination with EBV-based markers[61]. Hypermethylation of RASSF1A was related with age at diagnosis and T stage. An in vitro study showed that ectopic expression of RASSF1A could inhibit tumorigenicity via cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase and induce apoptosis in a Ras-dependent manner[59].
FBLN2
FBLN2 gene is located at 3p25.1, and the protein it encodes interacts with extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Law et al.[44] demonstrated that it played a pivotal tumor-suppressive and anti-angiogenic role in NPC. Methylation of FBLN2 has been observed in breast, colorectal, and lung cancers[66], and deletion of this gene has often been detected in ESCC[67].
RBMS3
RBMS3 gene encodes an RNA-binding protein that belongs to the c-myc gene single-strand binding protein (MSSP) family[68]. These proteins are characterized by the presence of two sets of ribonucleoprotein consensus sequences that contain conserved motifs, RNP1 and RNP2, that were originally described in RNA-binding proteins and are required for DNA binding. MSSP family proteins have many diverse functions and regulate processes such as DNA replication, gene transcription, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. RBMS3 was isolated by virtue of its binding to an upstream element of the alpha 2 (type I) collagen promoter[69]. It localizes mostly in the cytoplasm, suggesting that it may be involved in a cytoplasmic function, such as controlling RNA metabolism, rather than transcription. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants of the RBMS3 gene that encode various isoforms have been found. However, the relationship between RBMS3 and NPC has not been revealed.
In our recent study (unpublished), down-regulation of RBMS3 was detected in all 3 (100%) cell lines and 13 of 15 (86.7%) paired NPC tissues. Functional analysis showed that RBMS3 suppressed tumorigenicity of NPC cells both in vitro and in vivo, including inhibiting cell growth, colony formation in vitro, and tumor formation in nude mice. At the molecular level, the tumor suppressive mechanism of RBMS3 involved cell cycle arrest at the G1/S checkpoint induced through up-regulation of Smad4, p53, and p21, down-regulation of cyclin E and CDK2, and subsequent inhibition of Rb phosphorylation at Ser780. Mechanistic investigations also suggested these effects may be mediated by down-regulation of β-catenin and inactivation of its downstream targets, including cyclin D1, c-myc, and MMP7. Furthermore, RBMS3 was found to induce apoptosis in a mitochondrial-dependent manner by activating caspase-9 and PARP. Taken together, our findings reveal RBMS3 as an important TSG in NPC development.
CHL1
The protein encoded by CHL1 is a member of the L1 family of neural cell adhesion molecules. It is a neural recognition protein that may be involved in signal transduction pathways. Similarly, the CHL1 gene is involved in general cognitive activities[70],[71] and neurological diseases such as schizophrenia[72]. Deletion of one copy of this gene might be responsible for mental defects in patients with 3p- syndrome. Recently, several cell adhesion molecules, including L1, were shown to be involved in cancer growth and metastasis[73],[74]. 3p26 has been reported to harbor a candidate gene for prostate cancer susceptibility in Finnish prostate cancer families; however, no mutations were detected in the coding part of CHL1[75]. Nevertheless, these reports suggest that CHL1 plays a pivotal role in cancer development[33], not only in neuronal activities. In our recent study (unpublished), down-regulation of CHL1 caused by promoter methylation was observed in both ESCC and NPC. Furthermore, functional study showed that ectopic expression of CHL1 in NPC cells dramatically inhibited their clonogenicity and migration as compared with parental NPC cells without CHL1 expression. These data provide preliminary evidence that CHL1 has tumor suppressive functions in NPC.
Conclusions and Perspectives
During NPC progression, regional chromosomal loss is a major mechanism by which TSGs are inactivated. Loss of 3p is a frequently detected alteration in NPC and has been identified as an early genomic event associated with the NPC development[16]-[18]. Due to the highest frequency of copy number loss at 3p21.1-21.3 and 3p25.2-26.1, much effort has been devoted to identify target genes responsible for 3p deletion. However, the extensive and complex nature of chromosomes makes it difficult to identify the biologically relevant aberrations and functional significance. During this decade, identification and characterization of 3p target genes, such as RASSF1A, GNAT1, and BLU, has been the focus of many researches. Furthermore, efforts remain underway to determine the roles of 3p target genes in NPC progression. Although more and more candidate TSGs lost in 3p have been identified, the precise mechanisms underlying NPC initiation and progression remain unclear. It is also vital to understand coactivation of these TSGs as well as the relationship among EBV, miRNAs, and TSGs in the development of NPC, which has prompted investigation of the microenvironment, immune surveillance and elimination, cancer cell transformation and invasion. With the increasing understanding of viral, genetic, and environmental factors, development of gene-based or miRNA-based therapy may lead to the eradication of NPC and related diseases in the future.
References
- 1.Lin T, Hsu M, Chen K, et al. et al. Morbidity and mortality of cancer of the nasopharynx in Taiwan. Gann Monogr. 1971;10:137–144. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vokes EE, Liebowitz DN, Weichselbaum RR. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 1997;350:1087–1091. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07269-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yu MC, Yuan JM. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002;12:421–429. doi: 10.1016/s1044579x02000858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chan SH. Aetiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1990;19:201–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chan AT, Teo PM, Johnson PJ. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1007–1015. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marks JE, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on the relationship of race and national origin to the histology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;83:582–588. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980801)83:3<582::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huang TB, Liu Q, Huang HM, et al. et al. Study on genetic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Guangdong, China. Chin J Med Genet. 2002;19:134–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vokes EE, Liebowitz DN, Weichselbaum RR. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 1997;350:1087–1091. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07269-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Young LS, Rickinson AB. Epstein-Barr virus: 40 years on. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:757–768. doi: 10.1038/nrc1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Busson P, Keryer C, Ooka T, et al. et al. EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinomas: from epidemiology to virus-targeting strategies. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:356–360. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Watkinson JC. The aetiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Otolaryngol. 2001;26:82–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2001.00449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Feng BJ, Huang W, Shugart YY, et al. et al. Genome-wide scan for familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma reveals evidence of linkage to chromosome 4. Nat Genet. 2002;31:395–399. doi: 10.1038/ng932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang DP, Ho JH, Chan WK, et al. et al. Cytogenetics of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma xenografts from southern Chinese. Int J Cancer. 1989;43:936–939. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910430535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu MT, Chen YR, Chen SC, et al. et al. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 induces micronucleus formation, represses DNA repair and enhances sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in human epithelial cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:2531–2539. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen YJ, Ko JY, Chen PJ, et al. et al. Chromosomal aberrations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999;25:169–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hui AB, Lo KW, Leung SF, et al. et al. Detection of recurrent chromosomal gains and losses in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Int J Cancer. 1999;82:498–503. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990812)82:4<498::aid-ijc5>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fang Y, Guan X, Guo Y, et al. et al. Analysis of genetic alterations in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001;30:254–260. doi: 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::aid-gcc1086>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chien G, Yuen PW, Kwong D, et al. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of nasopharygeal carcinoma: consistent patterns of genetic aberrations and clinicopathological correlations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2001;126:63–67. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(00)00392-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fan CS, Wong N, Leung SF, et al. et al. Frequent c-myc and Int-2 overrepresentations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:169–178. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(00)80216-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yan J, Fang Y, Liang Q, et al. et al. Novel chromosomal alterations detected in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Chin Med J (Engl) 2001;114:418–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rodriguez S, Khabir A, Keryer C, et al. et al. Conventional and array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinomas from the Mediterranean area. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005;157:140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lo KW, To KF, Huang DP. Focus on nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:423–428. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00119-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lo KW, Kwong J, Hui AB, et al. Huang DP. High frequency of promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3877–3881. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shih-Hsin Wu L. Construction of evolutionary tree models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma using comparative genomic hybridization data. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;168:105–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Trimeche M, Braham H, Ziadi S, et al. et al. Investigation of allelic imbalances on chromosome 3p in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Tunisia: high frequency of microsatellite instability in patients with early-onset of the disease. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:775–783. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Deng L, Jing N, Tan G, et al. et al. A common region of allelic loss on chromosome region 3p25.3-26.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1998;23:21–25. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199809)23:1<21::aid-gcc4>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tai ALS, Mak W, Ng PK, et al. et al. High-throughput loss-of-heterozygosity study of chromosome 3p in lung cancer using single-nucleotide polymorphism markers. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4133–4138. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hung J, Kishimoto Y, Sugio K, et al. et al. Allele-specific chromosome 3p deletions occur at an early stage in the pathogenesis of lung carcinoma. JAMA. 1995;273:558–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yen CC, Chen YJ, Chen JT, et al. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: correlations between chromosomal aberrations and disease progression/prognosis. Cancer. 2001;92:2769–2777. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011201)92:11<2769::aid-cncr10118>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kwong D, Lam A, Guan X, et al. et al. Chromosomal aberrations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma among Chinese: gain of 12p predicts poor prognosis after surgery. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ogasawara S, Maesawa C, Tamura G, et al. et al. Frequent microsatellite alterations on chromosome 3p in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1995;55:891–894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hu N, Roth MJ, Polymeropolous M, et al. et al. Identification of novel regions of allelic loss from a genomewide scan of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in a high-risk Chinese population. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;27:217–228. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(200003)27:3<217::aid-gcc1>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qin YR, Fu L, Sham PC, et al. et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism-mass array reveals commonly deleted regions at 3p22 and 3p14.2 associate with poor clinical outcome in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:826–830. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Amato E, Barbi S, Malpeli G, et al. et al. Chromosome 3p alterations in pancreatic endocrine neoplasia. Virchows Arch. 2011;458:39–45. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-1001-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vissers LE, Veltman JA, Van Kessel AG, et al. et al. Identification of disease genes by whole genome CGH arrays. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:215–223. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou L, Jiang W, Ren C, et al. Frequent hypermethylation of RASSF1A and TSLC1, and high viral load of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and matched tumor-adjacent tissues. Neoplasia. 2005;7:809–815. doi: 10.1593/neo.05217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yi HM, Ren CP, Peng D, et al. et al. Expression, loss of heterozygosity, and methylation of GNAT1 gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ai Zheng. 2007;26:9–14. [in Chinese] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yi HM, Li H, Peng D, et al. et al. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of LTF at 3p21.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncol Res. 2006;16:261–272. doi: 10.3727/000000006783981008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Qiu GH, Tan LK, Loh KS, et al. et al. The candidate tumor suppressor gene BLU, located at the commonly deleted region 3p21.3, is an E2F-regulated, stress-responsive gene and inactivated by both epigenetic and genetic mechanisms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncogene. 2004;23:4793–4806. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wen Z, Xiangling F, Hong L, et al. et al. Inactivation of LARS2, located at the commonly deleted region 3p21.3, by both epigenetic and genetic mechanisms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2009;41:54–62. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmn006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tan C, Li J, Wang J, et al. et al. Protenomic analysis differential protein expression in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells induced by NAG7 transfection. Proteomics. 2002;2:306–312. doi: 10.1002/1615-9861(200203)2:3<306::aid-prot306>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xiong W, Zeng Z, Xia J, et al. et al. A susceptibility locus at chromosome 3p31 linked to family nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1972–1974. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zeng Z, Zhou Y, Xiong W, et al. et al. Analysis of gene expression identifies candidate molecular markers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using microdissection and cDNA microarray. J Cancer Res, Clin Oncol. 2007;133:71–81. doi: 10.1007/s00432-006-0136-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Law EWL, Cheung AKL, Kashuba VI, et al. et al. Anti-angiogenic and tumor-suppressive roles of candidate tumor-suppressor genes, Fibulin-2, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncogene. 2011 Jul 11; doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.272. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kathrin Herrmann GN. Epstein-Barr virus-associated carcinomas: facts and fiction. J Pathol. 2003;199:140–145. doi: 10.1002/path.1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhong BL, Zong YS, Lin SX, et al. et al. Epstein-Barr virus infection in precursor lesions of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ai Zheng. 2006;25:136–142. [in Chinese] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lin CT, Kao HJ, Lin JL, et al. et al. Response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells to Epstein-Barr virus infection in vitro. Lab Invest. 2000;80:1149–1160. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lim LP, Lau NC, Garrett-Engele P, et al. et al. Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature. 2005;433:769–773. doi: 10.1038/nature03315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yi HM, Ren CP, Peng D, et al. et al. Expression, loss of heterozygosity, and methylation of GNAT1 gene in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ai Zheng. 2007;26:9–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yi HM, Li H, Peng D, et al. et al. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of LTF at 3p21.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncol Res. 2006;16:261–272. doi: 10.3727/000000006783981008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang H, Feng X, Liu W, et al. et al. Underlying mechanisms for LTF inactivation and its functional analysis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:1832–1843. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhou Y, Zeng Z, Zhang W, et al. et al. Lactotransferrin: a candidate tumor suppressor—deficient expression in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma and inhibition of NPC cell proliferation by modulating the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2065–2072. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shaheduzzaman S, Vishwanath A, Furusato B, et al. et al. Silencing of Lactotransferrin expression by methylation in prostate cancer progression. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:1088–1095. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.7.4327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Iijima H, Tomizawa Y, Iwasaki Y, et al. et al. Genetic and epigenetic inactivation of LTF gene at 3p21.3 in lung cancers. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:797–801. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu XQ, Chen HK, Zhang XS, et al. et al. Alterations of BLU, a candidate tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 3p21.3, in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:60–65. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Agathanggelou A, Dallol A, Zöchbauer-Müller S, et al. et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the candidate 3p21.3 suppressor gene BLU in human cancers. Oncogene. 2003;22:1580–1588. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yau WL, Lung HL, Zabarovsky ER, et al. et al. Functional studies of the chromosome 3p21.3 candidate tumor suppressor gene BLU/ZMYND10 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2821–2826. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhou W, Feng X, Li H, et al. et al. Inactivation of LARS2, located at the commonly deleted region 3p21.3, by both epigenetic and genetic mechanisms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2009;41:54–62. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmn006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang T, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. et al. Methylation associated inactivation of RASSF1A and its synergistic effect with activated K-Ras in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:160. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hutajulu SH, Indrasari SR, Indrawati LP, et al. et al. Epigenetic markers for early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a high risk population. Mol Cancer. 2011;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chow LS, Lo KW, Kwong J, et al. et al. RASSF1A is a target tumor suppressor from 3p21.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2004;109:839–847. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fendri A, Masmoudi A, Khabir A, et al. et al. Inactivation of RASSF1A, RARbeta2 and DAP-kinase by promoter methylation correlates with lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8:444–451. doi: 10.4161/cbt.8.5.7686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Syeed N, Syed Sameer A, Hamid A, et al. et al. Promoter methylation profile of GSTP1 and RASSF1A in benign hyperplasia and metastatic prostate cancer patients in a Kashmiri population. Mol Med Report. 2010;3:883–887. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2010.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang J, Wang B, Chen X, et al. et al. The prognostic value of RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:411–416. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mao WM, Li P, Zheng QQ, et al. et al. Hypermethylation-modulated downregulation of RASSF1A expression is associated with the progression of esophageal cancer. Arch Med Res. 2011;42:182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hill VK, Hesson LB, Dansranjavin T, et al. et al. Identification of 5 novel genes methylated in breast and other epithelial cancers. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:51. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chattopadhyay I, Singh A, Phukan R, et al. et al. Genome-wide analysis of chromosomal alterations in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma exposed to tobacco and betel quid from high-risk area in India. Mutat Res. 2010;696:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Penkov D, Ni RJ, Else C, et al. et al. Cloning of a human gene closely related to the genes coding for the c-myc single-strand binding proteins. Gene. 2000;243:27–36. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00515-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fritz D, Stefanovic B. RNA-binding protein RBMS3 is expressed in activated hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis and increases expression of transcription factor Prx1. J Mol Biol. 2007;371:585–595. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Angeloni D, Lindor NM, Pack S, et al. et al. CALL gene is haploinsufficient in a 3p- syndrome patient. Am J Med Genet. 1999;86:482–485. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19991029)86:5<482::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Frints SG, Marynen P, Hartmann D, et al. et al. CALL interrupted in a patient with non-specific mental retardation: gene dosage-dependent alteration of murine brain development and behavior. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:1463–1474. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sakurai K, Migita O, Toru M, et al. et al. An association between a missense polymorphism in the close homologue of L1 (CHL1, CALL) gene and schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7:412–415. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Manderson EN, Birch AH, Shen Z, et al. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of a cell adhesion molecule with homology to L1CAM, contactin 6, and contactin 4 candidate chromosome 3p26pter tumor suppressor genes in ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:513–525. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a3cd38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Stoeck A, Schlich S, Issa Y, et al. et al. L1 on ovarian carcinoma cells is a binding partner for Neuropilin-1 on mesothelial cells. Cancer Lett. 2006;239:212–226. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rokman A, Baffoe-Bonnie AB, Gillanders E, et al. et al. Hereditary prostate cancer in Finland: fine-mapping validates 3p26 as a major predisposition locus. Hum Genet. 2005;116:43–50. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1214-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

