Abstract
We evaluated the in vitro and in vivo inhibition of S180 tumor cell growth of the water extract of Agrimonia pilosa. Inhibitory effect of Agrimonia pilosa on in vitro-cultured S180 cell proliferation was measured by MTT assay; mice model of transplanted tumor was established, after 8 days of continuous administration, the tumors were removed, weighed, and compared with the control group, and the in vivo anti-tumor effect of Agrimonia pilosa on mouse sarcoma S180 was compared using inhibition rate. The in vitro anti-tumor experiment indicated that the inhibition rate gradually increases with the increase of extract concentration and the extension of time, with IC50 175.64, 90.59, and 71.74 µg/ml at 24 h, 4 h, and 72 h respectively. In this study, the in vitro MTT assay was used to determine the inhibitory effect of Agrimony pilosa water extract on S180 tumor cells, the method is simple, reliable, and practical; mice model of in vivo transplanted S180 tumor was established, which allowed direct observation of tumor inhibitory effect, and thus found out that the water extract of Agrimonia pilosa has inhibitory effect on S180 tumor cells.
Keywords: Agrimonia pilosa, S180, Anti-tumor
Introduction
Agrimonia pilosa is the aerial parts of the Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb, which belongs to the Rosaceae plant family; it is mainly used in the treatment of various hemorrhage, malaria, fatigue, etc (Xiao-dan Wu et al., 2008). In recent years, with the gradual clarification of chemical composition of Agrimonia pilosa, its pharmacological effects are gradually increasing (Ying Zhao et al., 2007). Main effects include anti-tumor, antibacterial, antioxidant, cardiotonic, hypoglycemic, immune enhancement, hypotensive, taenicide, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory (Yu-qun Li et al., 1999; Xia-hui Zou et al., 2002). In this paper, in vitro and in vivo anticancer effect of water extract of Agrimonia pilosa was studied, improving the experimental basis for the in-depth study of pharmacological effects of Agrimonia pilosa.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and Apparatus
Agrimonia pilosa (purchased from Nepstar Drugstore); RPMI-1640 cell culture medium (GIBCO BRL); trypsin (Sigma); MTT (Sigma); fetal bovine serum (Hangzhou Shijiqing Biological Engineering Material Co., Ltd.); DMSO (Tianjin Kermel Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.); Agrimonia Pilosa was differentiated as the aerial parts of the Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb by Henan College of Traditonal Chinese Medicine.
Apparatus
96-well microplate (Biofil ); CO2 incubator (Model CP, Japan); inverted microscope (Model CK, Olympus, Japan); Clean Bench (Sujing Group Antai Company); automatic microplate reader (Model 450, Bio-Rad, USA); Analytical balance FA2004 (Shanghai Balance Instrument Plant)
Cancer Cell Strains
S180 tumor cells (purchased from Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Preparation of Agrimonia Pilosa Water Extract
500g of dry Agrimonia pilosa was weighed and added with water 15 times its volume; the solution was extracted for three times using ultrasonic extraction with 1 h each; the extracts were combined, concentrated and freeze-dried; and powder was obtained for later use.
Determination of Inhibitory Effect of the Drug on Mice S180 Cell Growth with MTT Assay (Jing Gao et al., 2008)
Cells in the logarithmic growth phase were collected and added with 0.25% trypsin, and digested at 37 □ for 2 min, 10% fetal bovine serum RPMI1640 culture medium was added to stop the digestion, after centrifugation for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded. Fresh culture medium was added again and single cell suspension was prepared, after cell counting, the concentration of suspension was prepared as 1×104/ml. 100 µ l of the cell suspension was added into each well of the 96-well microplate, the microplate was placed at a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator and cultured for 24 h for cell adherence. Different concentrations of drugs were added in the cell culture microplate, with at least three parallel wells for each concentration; solvent control-treated cells were prepared as the control group. The cultivation was continued and 50 µl of MTT solution (1mg/ml) was added at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h respectively. The incubation was continued for 4 more hours, and the supernatant was discarded, 200 µl of DMSO was added, and the microplate was placed and shaken on the microplate shaker. The absorbance was determined at 490 nm using a microplate reader, and the inhibition rate of tumor cells was calculated. The calculation formula is as follows:
Cell growth inhibition rate (%) = [(average value of the control group − average value of the treatment group) / average value of the control group] × 100%
The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) could be obtained by mapping of different drug concentrations and inhibition rate.
Experiment of Transplanted S180 Inhibitory Effect in Mice (Ying Hu et al., 2003)
KM mice weighing 18∼22 g (half male half female) were inoculated intraperitoneally with murine S180 cells. One week later, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the ascites were removed under sterile conditions and diluted with saline to the desired concentration. 200 µl of tumor effluent was inoculated subcutaneously into the right axillary of each mouse. On the next day of inoculation, the mice were randomly grouped and weighed, the Agrimonia pilosa extract group was divided into low, medium, and high dose groups, with doses of 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg respectively, and with cyclophosphamide as the positive control group, and normal saline the negative control group, each group consisted of 10 mice, they were intraperitoneally injected with the drug once a day, 200 µl per time, the administration continued for 8 days. 24 h after drug discontinuance, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and weighed, and the underarm tumor was removed and weighed. The tumor inhibition rate was calculated. The calculation formula is as follows:
Tumor growth inhibition rate (%) = [(average tumor weight of control group − average tumor weight of treatment group) / average tumor weight of control group] × 100%
Determination of Mouse Peritoneal Macrophage Phagocytosis
Another 50 mice were inoculated with tumor strains and grouped, dosing schedule was the same as the schedule prescribed in section above, in the 8th day, 1 h after last administration, each mouse was intraperitoneally injected with 1 ml of 5% (V/V) chicken red blood cell suspension, 30 min later, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and intraperitoneally injected with 2 ml of saline, after gently rubbing the mouse abdomen for 1 min, 1 ml of peritoneal washes were drawn and dropped on the glass slide (two parallel samples), and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, and then rinsed with saline, dried, and fixed. After giemsa staining, 100 macrophages were observed and counted under the microscope, and phagocytic percentage and phagocytic index were calculated in accordance with the following formula:
Macrophage phagocytic percentage = swallow chicken erythrocytes / 100
Phagocytic index = 100 phagocytes engulfed by the total number of chicken erythrocytes / 100.
Results and Discussion
The MTT colorimetry assay was used to observe the S180 cell growth inhibition at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h time points; and relatively obvious sarcoma cell proliferation effect was found, which was featured by dose dependent and time dependent inhibition (Tables 1 and 2). In the high concentration group (1000 µg/ml), the inhibition rate reached 69.23 % at 24 h, and with the extension of time, cell growth inhibition was markedly enhanced, after 72 h, the inhibition rate reached 76.92%. With the decrease of concentration, the inhibitory effect was also decreasing. In the medium concentration group (125 µg/ml), the inhibition rate reached 58.62 % after 48 h. And in the low concentration group (15.63 µg/ml), the inhibitory rate was 26.37 % after 72 h, which was not quite obvious. Studies by other researchers also demonstrated the existence of dose-time dependence in the inhibitory effect of Agrimonia pilosa on tumor cells (Wei Guo et al., 2002).
Table 1.
Inhibition Rates of S180 Cells by Different Concentrations of Agrimonia Pilosa Extracts
| concentrations(µg/ml) | 24h(%) | 48h(%) | 72h(%) |
| 15.63 | 10.77 | 28.74 | 26.37 |
| 31.25 | 29.23 | 34.48 | 41.76 |
| 62.5 | 40.00 | 48.28 | 50.55 |
| 125 | 50.77 | 58.62 | 61.54 |
| 250 | 59.92 | 64.37 | 67.03 |
| 500 | 61.54 | 67.82 | 71.43 |
| 1000 | 69.23 | 72.41 | 76.92 |
Table 2.
IC50 of S180 Cells by Agrimonia Pilosa Extract at Different Time Points
| Time | 24h | 48h | 72h |
| IC50(µg/ml) | 175.64 | 90.59 | 71.74 |
Phagocytic percentage and phagocytic index gradually increased with the increase of concentrations of Agrimonia pilosa extract (Table 4), which was especially significant in the high dose group (P <0.05), while the positive drug cyclophosphamide had a certain inhibitory effect on the phagocytosis of peritoneal macrophages.
Table 4.
Effect of Agrimonia Pilosa Extract on Phagocytic Percentage and Index of S180 Transplanted Mice (x ± s, n = 10)
| Group | n | Phagocytic percentage(%) | Phagocytic index(%) |
| Low dose group | 10 | 30.3±5.5 | 1.12±0.35 |
| Medium dose group | 10 | 41.4±8.7 | 1.17±0.28 |
| High dose group | 10 | 52.9±6.4* | 1.28±0.31* |
| Positive control group | 10 | 25.1±3.9 | 0.86±0.25 |
| Negative control group | 10 | 28. 7±4.9 | 0.91±0.41 |
Note: comparison with the negative control group:
p <0.05
Animal transplantable carcinomas experimental method is a commonly used experimental method, it is easy to implement, where a large number of uniformly grown tumors can be obtained at the same time, during the administration period, inhibition effect of the drug on tumor growth can be determined through the observation of general condition of the mice, such as diet, activity, weight and mortality. After dissection, the tumor was separated, and the tumor inhibition status can be directly observed, which is irreplaceable by any other in vivo experiments. In the S180 ascites dilution, the ratio with saline is generally about 1:3 or 1:4. After dilution, the solution should be placed in the sterile flat bottom Erlenmeyer flask, and immersed in an ice bath maintained at low temperatures. To ensure each laboratory mouse was inoculated with the same number of cells, the solution should be gently shaken during each extraction.
It can be seen from Figure 1 that the inhibitory effect of the drug gradually increased with the gradual increase of concentrations, and the extension of time.
Figure.
Inhibition Rates of S180 Cells by Different Concentrations of Agrimonia Pilosa Extracts
In this experimental study, evident inhibitory effect of Agrimonia pilosa water extract on S180 cells and its dose-time dependence were found with the MTT assay. In vivo mice transplanted S180 model experiment the tumor inhibition effect can be observed directly, and thus found out that the inhibitory effect of Agrimonia pilosa on the growth of S180 tumor cells exists both in vitro and in vivo, which was consistent with the reported literature (Jing Yuan et al., 2000; Kai-min Gao et al., 2000).
This experimental study found that the water extract of Agrimonia pilosa can enhance the immune function of S180 transplanted mice, and promote the phagocytic activity of macrophages, and such immune function enhancement showed a dose dependent trend. Moreover, the effects of Agrimonia Pilosa extracts on improving organism immunity are primarily proved, of which the exact action mechanism should be further evaluated.
Table 3.
Effect of Agrimonia Pilosa Extract on Body Weight and Tumor Weight of S180 Inoculated Mice (x s, n = 10)
| Group | Dosage (mg/kg) |
Body weight (g) Before administration |
After administration |
Tumor weight (g) |
Average inhibition rate (%) |
| Low dose group |
10 | 20.36±1.56 | 25.63±1.02 | 1.87±0.35 | 25.50* |
| Medium dose group |
50 | 21.42±0.73 | 26.19±0.85 | 1.36±0.28* | 45.81* |
| High dose group |
100 | 19.98±2.41 | 24.04±1.37 | 0.81±0.31* | 67.73** |
| Positive control group |
100 | 22.16±1.81 | 25.15±1.19 | 0.46±0.25* | 81.67** |
| Negative control group |
- | 21.37±0.92 | 27.01±0.92 | 2.51±0.41 | - |
Note: comparison with the negative control group:
p <0.05,
p <0.01
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Science and Technology.
References
- 1.Wu Xiao-dan, Jin Zhe-xiong. Research Progress on Agrimonia Pilosa Ledeb. 2008. pp. 297–304. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhao Ying, Zhao Chun-fang, Liu Jin-ping, et al. Study on Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Agrimonia Pilosa Ledeb. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research. 2007:257–261. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li Yu-qun. Research Progress on Anti-Tumor Effect of Agrimonia Pilosa Ledeb. China Pharmaceuticals. 1999;8(11):60. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zou Xia-hui. Acta Academiae Medicinae Jiangxi. 2002. Experimental Study on Anticancer Effect of Agrimonia Pilosa Ledeb on Hepatocellular Carcinoma SMMC-7721 Cells. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao Jing. Study on Effective Fractions of Agrimonia Pilosa Ledeb Compound and Its Anti-tumor Effect. Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hu Ying, Wang Zeng-zhen, Zeng Fan-bo, et al. Study on Inhibitory Effect of Allium Fistulosum on Growth of Transplanted S180 Tumors in Mice. Cancer Prevention and Treatment Research. 2003;30(5):393–394. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guo Wei, Zhao Ze-zhen, Dan Bao-en, et al. Experimental Report on Anti-Mutagenic and Anti-Tumor Activity of Six Kinds of Chinese Herbal Medicine. Carcinogenesis, Teratogenesis and Mutagenesis. 2002;14(2):94–98. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yuan Jing, Wang Yuan-xun, Hou Zheng-ming, et al. In Vitro Inhibitory Effect of Agrimonnin on Human Tumor Cells. Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Science and Technology. 2000;7(6):378–379. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gao Kai-min, Zhou Ling, Chen Jin-ying, et al. In Vitro Induction of Apoptosis of HL-60 Cells by Agrimony Decoction. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials. 2000;23(9):561–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

