Abstract
An in vitro antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of various extracts of Indigofera trita L. viz. petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and aqueous extracts were carried out. A total of 21 microorganisms (19 bacteria and 2 fungal strains) were used for antimicrobial activity by disc diffusion method and a standard procedure was used to identify the phytochemical constituents. Petroleum ether extract showed moderate inhibitory activity against Staphylococcus aureus (14.40 mm), S. epidermidis (14.20 mm), Salmonella paratyphi A (12.80 mm), Streptococcus mutans (12.20 mm), Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, S. typhi and Burkholderia cepacia (12.00 mm). The chloroform extract also showed antimicrobial activity against S. epidermidis (14.20 mm), S. typhimurium (12.60 mm), S. paratyphi A, S. brunei and Yersinia enterocolitica (12.00 mm). The acetone extract of I. trita showed considerable inhibitory activity against S. epidermidis (18.20 mm), S. typhimurium (14.60 mm), S. infantis (13.80 mm), S. aureus (13.40 mm), Y. enterocolitica (13.00 mm) and Enterobacter aerogenes (12.00 mm) were documented. Ethanol extract showed significant antimicrobial activity against S. epidermidis (18.60 mm), S. paratyphi A (14.60 mm), Y. enterocolitica (13.40 mm), S. typhi (12.40 mm), S. aureus, E. aerogenes, S. typhimurium and S. infantis (12.00 mm). Aqueous extract of I. trita considerably inhibited S. epidermidis (13.80 mm), S. paratyphi A and Y. enterocolitica (12.20 mm), E. aerogenes and Haemophilus parahaemolyticus (12.00 mm). All the five extracts showed a minimal antifungal activity when compared to antibacterial activity. The result revealed that the antimicrobial properties of I. trita might be associated with the presence of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, tannins, glycosides, saponins, phytosterols and alkaloids.
Keywords: Inidigofera trita, Phytoconstituents, Antimicrobial activity, Antifungal activity, Disc diffusion method
Introduction
Today's health care systems relay largely on plant based materials (Kumar et al., 2012). In India, Ayurvedic system of medicine has excited for over four thousand years and it was various parts of the plants that were used in siddha, ayurvedha and unani medicine for the diseases of human beings (Palaniswamy et al., 2010). Plants contain a large number of naturally occurring chemicals that have biological activity and also have a potential for producing new drug of great benefit to mankind (Dahikar et al., 2009; Parekh and Chandren, 2006). Modern medicine has evolved from folk medicines and traditional system only after through chemical and pharmaceutical screening (Boopathi and Sivakumar, 2011). In recent years, one of the more alarming trends in clinical microbiology has been the increasing incidence of resistance to antimicrobial agents among pathogens causing various diseases (Adwan et al., 2011). In addition, misuse of the antibiotics which can lead to the development of antibiotic resistance is also a major health concern (Al-Bari et al., 2007). Recently the application of traditional medicinal plants and their products as therapeutic agents has immensely increased throughout the globe (Vijayanand and Hemapriya, 2011). Medicinal plants have been important source of products in treating common infections and overcoming the problems of resistance and side effects of currently available antimicrobial agents (Hemaiswarya et al., 2008). Many plants have been employed because of their antimicrobial traits which are due to compounds synthesized during secondary metabolism and it was specifically targeted against the resistant microorganisms (Vijayanand and Hemapriya, 2011; Nostro et al., 2006). Moreover, the current costs of the chemotherapeutic agents are unaffordable to the public especially in developing countries. Therefore. attempts must be directed towards the development of effective natural, non-toxic drugs for treatment. Also their toxicity is very low when compared to the currently available commercial antibiotics (Sarala et al., 2010). However, several active principles of many medicinal plants have been isolated and introduced as valuable drugs in moderrn system of medicine. So, researchers are increasing and turning their attention to natural products looking for new leads to develop better drugs against microbial infection (Saravanan et al., 2011). The phytochemical research based on ethno-pharmacological information is generally considered to be an effective approach in the discovery of new anti infective agents from higher plants (Duraipandiyan et al., 2006).
Indigofera trita L. (Family: Fabaceae), an under-shrub, is widely distributed in India, Ceylon, South Africa and North Australia (Sanjappa, 1984). The plant is known as Kattuavuri and Punal murungai in Tamil Nadu. Indiofera trita has long been used by tribes and native medicinal practitioners to treat diseases such as rheumatism, arthritis, inflammation, tumor and liver diseases (Nadkarni, 1996; Kirtikar and Basu, 1993). Literature review revealed that the plant I. trita is having antitumor (Senthilkumar et al., 2007), hepatoprotective, antioxidant, (Senthilkumar et al., 2008), anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities (Senthilkumar et al., 2009). Based on the above details, the present study is aimed to investigate the antimicrobial activity of various extracts of I. trita against a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms.
Materials and Methods
Collection of plant materials
The whole plant part of I. trita was collected from the foothill of Yercaud, Salem in the month of February 2008. The plant was then authenticated by Dr. G.V.S. Murthy, joint Director, Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. (REF.BSI/SC/5/23/07-08/TECH-1384). A voucher specimen was preserved in our laboratory for future reference.
Extraction of Plant Materials
The plant materials were shade dried and pulverized. 250 g of powdered material was packed in Soxhlet apparatus and subjected to continuous hot percolation for 8 h using 450 ml of petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and water as solvent. All the extracts were concentrated under vacuum and dried in a dessicator.
Phytochemical Analysis
Various extracts of I. trita were analyzed for the phytochemical constituents viz., carbohydrates, glycosides, fixed oils, fats, proteins, amino acids, saponins, tannins, phytosterol, alkaloids, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, gum and mucilage using standard procedures described by Harbourne (1984), Hebert et al. (1984), Basset et al. (1985) and Kokate (1990).
Antimicrobial Screening
Source of microbial strains
Strains of human pathogenic microorganisms used in this study is as follows, three gram positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 96), Staphylococcus epidermidis (MTCC 435) and Streptococcus mutans (MTCC 890); sixteen gram negative bacteria, Escherichia coli (MTCC 739), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC 432), Enterobacter aerogenes (MTCC 111), Proteus vulgaris (MTCC 742), Proteus mirabilis (MTCC 425), Salmonella typhi (MTCC 733), Salmonella paratyphi A (MTCC 735), Salmonella typhimurium (MTCC 98), Salmonella infantis (MTCC 1167), Salmonella enterica (MTCC 660), Salmonella brunei (MTCC 1168), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 424), Burkholderia cepacia (MTCC 1617), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (MTCC 451), Haemophilus parahaemolyticus (MTCC 1776) and Yersinia enterocolitica (MTCC 80); two fungus, Candida albicans (MTCC 183) and Cryptococcus neoformans (clinical isolate). The microorganisms were originally obtained from MICROBIAL TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION CENTRE (MTCC), INSTITUTE OF MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, CHANDIGARH, INDIA. Cultures were maintained as respective agar slants in screw-capped bottles and stored at 4°C. All cultures were checked for viability and purity by regular plating.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) - Disc Diffusion Method (Determination of antimicrobial activity)
The antimicrobial activities of I. trita (petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and aqueous extract) were tested by disc diffusion method (Bauer-Kirby et al., 1966). The culture plates were prepared by pouring 20 ml of sterile Hi-sensitivity (HIMEDIA-M 486) agar medium. The depth of the medium was approximately 4 mm. Three to four similar colonies of pure cultures were inoculated with tryptone soy broth (HIMEDIA-M 323), further, it was incubated at 37°C for 2–8 h and inoculum size was adjusted to yield uniform suspension containing 105–106 cells/ml (McFarland's standard). The agar surface of the plates was swabbed in three directions, turning the plates at 60? between each swabbing. Confluent growth is desirable for accurate results. The sterile discs (6 mm-HIMEDIA) were used for the loading plant extracts. Five different concentrations were prepared (250, 500, 750, 1000 and 1250 µg) and loaded in appropriate discs. The impregnated discs were incubated at 37°C for an hour. The dried discs were placed over the surface of swabbed medium with equal distance to avoid the overlapping of the zones of inhibition. Then discs were pressed gently on the surface of the medium. The prepared plates were refrigerated for 30 min (Prediffusion time). The plates were incubated at 37°C for 16–18 h during which the activity was evidenced by the presence of zones of inhibition surrounding the discs. Each experiment was done in triplicate. Specific standard antibiotic disc were used as control against each microbial strain.
Results
The extractive yield values of I. trita against different solvents were recorded in Table 1. Based on extractive yields, it was confirmed that the yield gradually increased depending on the polarity of solvents (petroleum ether - 2.2%, chloroform 2.43%, acetone - 3.34%, ethanol - 3.9% and aqueous - 4.8%).
Table 1.
Data showing the extractive values of Indigofera trita L.
| Yield in Percentage | ||||||||
| Plant name | Part used | Material of extraction | Petroleum ether | Chloroform | Acetone | Ethanol | Aqueous | |
|
Indigofera trita Linn |
Entire plant | Continuous hot percolation Method |
2.2 | 2.43 | 3.34 | 3.9 | 4.8 | |
The screening of phytochemical analysis of I. trita revealed that the carbohydrates were present in all the extracts. Glycosides, saponins, tannins, phenolic compounds and flavonoids were present in high polarity solvents (acetone, ethanol and aqueous). Alkaloids were only present in chloroform and ethanolic extracts. Phytosterols, fixed oils and fats were found to be present only in petroleum ether extract. Proteins and amino acids were present in all extracts except petroleum ether and none of the extracts exhibited the presence of gums and mucilages (Table 2).
Table 2.
Preliminary phytochemical Analysis results of various extracts of Indigofera trita L.
| Name of the extracts | Carbohydrate | Glycosides | Fixed oils and Fats | Proteins and amino acids |
Saponins | Tannins | Phytosterol | Alkaloids | Phenolic compounds | Flavonoids | Gums and mucilages |
|
Petroleum ether |
+ | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| Chloroform | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | − |
| Acetone | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| Ethanol | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − |
| Aqueous | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − |
The antimicrobial activity of various extracts of I. trita (petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and aqueous) were determined against 21 microorganisms including two fungi (Table 3). Petroleum ether extract showed moderate antimicrobial activity against all tested organisms and the average zone of inhibition ranged from 10.20 ± 0.20 to 14.40 ± 1.16. S. aureus (14.40 mm) and S. epidermidis (14.20 mm) were inhibited considerably by petroleum ether extract. 20 microorganisms were moderately inhibited by chloroform extract, the mean zone of inhibition ranged from 10.20 ± 0.24 to 14.20 ± 0.80 and S. epidermidis alone considerably inhibited 14.20 mm. Acetone extract of I. trita was effective against all tested organisms, the mean zone of inhibition ranged from 10.40 ± 0.24 to 18.20 ± 1.62 and this extract showed considerable antimicrobial activity against S. epidermidis (18.20 mm), S. paratyphi A (15.40 mm), S. typhimurium (14.60 mm), S. infantis (13.80 mm) and S. aureus (13.40 mm). Ethanolic and aqueous extracts invariably inhibited all microorganisms. The ethanolic extract was effective against S. epidermidis (18.20 mm), S. paratyphi A (14.60 mm) and Y. enterocolitica (13.40 mm) and aqueous extract considerably inhibited S. epidermidis (13.20 mm). In overall assessment all the extracts were found to possess antimicrobial potentiality and it should be further established with isolated compounds.
Table 3.
Antimicrobial activity of Indigofera trita L. (petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, ethanol and aqueous extracts)
| Zone of inhibition in mm | |||||||
| Name of the organisms | Standard antibiotic mcg/disc | Zone in mm |
Petroleum ether extract |
Chloroform extract |
Acetone extract | Ethanol extract | Aqueous extract |
| Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | |||
| Staphylococcus aureus | Amoxycillin (30) | 28 | 14.40 ± 1.16 | 11.00± 0.44 | 13.40± 0.67 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 13.20 ± 0.96 |
| Staphylococcus epidermidis | Cloxacillin (5) | 28 | 14.20 ± 1.06 | 14.20± 0.80 | 18.20± 1.62 | 18.60 ± 0.87 | 13.80 ± 0.37 |
| Streptococcus mutans | Amoxycillin (30) | 28 | 12.20 ± 1.46 | 11.60 ± 0.24 | 10.40 ± 0.24 | 10.40 ± 0.67 | 11.00 ± 0.00 |
| Escherichia coli | Gatifloxacin (5) | 30 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 11.20 ± 0.20 | 11.20 ± 0.37 | 11.60 ± 0.24 | 11.00 ± 0.31 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | Gatifloxacin (5) | 20 | 10.00 ± 0.00 | 10.8 0± 0.37 | 10.60 ± 0.40 | 11.40 ± 0.24 | 11.40 ± 0.24 |
| Enterobacter aerogenes | Gatifloxacin (5) | 22 | 11.00 ± 0.00 | 11.40 ± 0.40 | 12.00± 0.00 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 12.00 ± 0.00 |
| Proteus mirabilis | Levofloxacin (5) | 19 | 11.20 ± 0.20 | 10.40 ± 0.24 | 10.40 ± 0.24 | 11.20 ± 0.37 | 10.20 ± 0.20 |
| Proteus vulgaris | Levofloxacin (5) | 21 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | - | 11.00 ± 0.44 | 09.40 ± 0.60 | 11.00 ± 0.31 |
| Salmonella typhi | Chloramphenicol (30) | 22 | 12.00± 0.00 | 11.40 ± 0.24 | 10.80 ± 0.37 | 12.40 ± 0.40 | 09.20 ± 0.48 |
| Salmonella paratyphi A | Chloramphenicol (30) | 23 | 12.80 ± 0.48 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 15.40 ± 1.50 | 14.60 ± 0.60 | 12.20 ± 0.73 |
| Salmonella typhimurium | Chloramphenicol (30) | 24 | 11.60 ± 0.24 | 12.60 ± 0.24 | 14.60 ± 0.81 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 11.20 ± 0.20 |
| Salmonella infantis | Chloramphenicol (30) | 19 | 11.2 0± 0.20 | 11.60 ± 0.24 | 13.80 ± 0.37 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 11.20 ± 0.20 |
| Salmonella enterica | Chloramphenicol (30) | 20 | 10.20 ± 0.20 | 11.00 ± 0.00 | 12.00 ± 0.77 | 11.60 ± 0.24 | 11.00 ± 0.63 |
| Salmonella brunei | Chloramphenicol (30) | 21 | 11.80 ± 0.20 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 10.80 ± 0.48 | 10.60 ± 0.40 | 08.20 ± 0.48 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Amikacin (30) | 20 | 11.00 ± 0.31 | 10.80 ± 0.37 | 10.80 ± 0.48 | 10.60 ± 0.24 | 10.60 ± 0.40 |
| Burkholderia cepacia | Amikacin (30) | 22 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 10.80 ± 0.37 | 11.60 ±0.24 | 11.60 ± 0.24 | 10.80 ± 0.37 |
| Vibrio parahaemolyticus | Tetracycline (30) | 23 | 10.80 ± 0.20 | 10.00 ± 0.89 | 10.40 ± 0.24 | 08.80 ± 0.48 | 10.00 ± 0.63 |
| Haemophilus parahaemolyticus | Tetracycline (30) | 29 | 10.80 ± 0.37 | 10.80 ± 0.37 | 11.60 ± 0.24 | 11.60 ± 0.67 | 12.00 ± 0.31 |
| Yersinia enterocolitica | Ticarcillin (75) | 22 | 11.80 ± 0.20 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 13.00 ± 0.44 | 13.40 ± 0.24 | 12.20 ± 0.20 |
| Candida albicans | Nystatin (100) | 20 | 11.00 ± 0.44 | 10.60 ± 0.24 | 10.80 ± 0.37 | 10.00 ± 0.00 | 10.60 ± 0.24 |
| Cryptococcus neoformans | Ketoconazole (10) | 21 | 10.20 ± 0.20 | 10.20 ± 0.24 | 10.60 ± 0.24 | 10.00 ± 0.00 | 10.40 ± 0.24 |
Discussion
The potential of higher plants as source for many new drugs are still largely unexplored. The use of medicinal plants still plays a major role to establish the basic health needs in developing countries. Nearly 80% of the world population rely on traditional medicine for primary health care, most of which involves the use of natural products (Sandhya et al., 2006). Plant based antimicrobial compounds have enormous therapeutically potential value as they can serve the purpose without any side effects that are often associated with synthetic antimicrobials (Sukanya et al., 2009). Plants extracts are potential sources of novel antimicrobial compounds especially against microorganisms which is responsible for human infections (Joshi et al., 2011). The first step towards this aspect is the in vitro screening of antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis (Tona et al., 1998). Some of these observations have helped to identify the active principle which is associated with antimicrobial activities and in developing drug for the therapeutic use in human beings (Mahesh and Satish, 2008). In recent years, the antibiotics have lost their effectiveness due to the development of resistant strains of bacteria and which has mediated with resistant genes (Davies, 1994 and Service, 1995). The emergence of multidrug resistant strains is a serious threat and makes chemotherapy more difficult (Sarala et al., 2010). Therefore, there is a need to develop alternative antimicrobial drugs for the treatment of infectious diseases (Berahou et al., 2007 and Salmao et al., 2008). The toxicity of new generation antibiotics discourages their use in treatment. Moreover, the current cost of most of the chemotherapeutic agents is unbearable to the society especially in developing countries like India (Sarala, 2010). Therefore attempts must be directed towards the development of effective natural, non-toxic drugs for treatment of human infections. Based on literature there was no extensive research report on antimicrobial activity of I. trita.A few reports only based on antitumor activity (Senthilkumar et al., 2007), antioxidant and hepatoprotective (Senthilkumar et al., 2008), anti-inflammatory and anti-analgesic (Senthilkumar et al., 2009) were reported. The present work is a pioneer attempt and has explored the antimicrobial properties I. trita. Preliminary phytochemical screening of I. trita consists of carbohydrates in all extracts, phenolic compounds, tannins, glycosides, saponins and flavonoids present in high polar solvents (acetone, ethanol and aqueous). Alkaloids were only present in chloroform and ethanolic extracts, phytosterol, fixed oils and fats were present in petroleum ether extract, protein and aminoacids were present in all extracts except petroleum ether. Gum and mucilage were not present in any of these extracts.
The antimicrobial activities of various extracts of I. trita revealed that all the extracts were effective against all tested microorganisms invariably. The petroleum ether extract inhibited all microorganisms moderately and effective against S. aureus and S. epidermidis, 20 microorganisms were moderately inhibited and effective against S. epidermidis with maximum zone of inhibition. Acetone extract showed good inhibitory effect against all tested organisms and highly effective with S. epidermidis, S. paratyphi A, S. typhimurium, S. infantis and S. aureus. Ethanolic and aqueous extracts also showed considerable antimicrobial activity, the ethanolic extract inhibited considerably S. epidermidis, S. paratyphi A and aqueous extract effective against S. epidermidis. In this present study antimicrobial properties explored with 21 microorganisms with five solvents and considerable results were also documented. A research report was similarly studied with I. trita L. F. SPP. subulata (vahl ex poir) by Vinoth et al. (2011) and ethanolic extract only showed moderate inhibitory activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus.
In overall assessments, the study result showed moderate inhibitory activity against almost all microorganisms and it is probably due to presence of phytochemicals in the respective extracts. Many substances may be antimicrobial, but only few of them will be potential therapeutic agents for the simple reasons that mammalian cells are more sensitive to chemical inhibitions than microbial cells (Sivakumar et al., 2006). The crude products obtained from cheaper sources are often associated with a large number of compounds that have discomforting abilities due to toxicity of drugs (Ramdas et al., 2006). Hence the herbal drugs have to be subjected to extensive toxicological and clinical tests to confirm the prescribed status. Thus the ethnobotanical approach will be like a search for molecular diversity subjecting a wide variety of new molecules from plant sources and testing them with as many different tests as possible (Muhammed et al., 2005).
The present study has proven a spectrum of antimicrobial activities, which facilitates a support to some medicinal uses of a few medicinal plants. However further studies are certainly needed to isolate, characterize the phytoconstituents which will be accounted for the antimicrobial properties against human pathogens.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Prof. Dr. M. Karunanithi, Chairman and Secretary, Vivekanandha Educational Institutions, Elayampalayam, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu for providing all the facilities for our research work.
References
- 1.Al-Bari MAA, Khan A, Islam MR, Kudrat-E-Zahan E, Rahman MMS, Ul-Islam MA, et al. Isolation and in vitro antimicrobial activities of ethyl acetate extract from Streptomyces bangladeshiensis. Res J Microbiol. 2007;2:272–277. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Basset J, Denny J, Jeffery JH, Mendham J. Volgel's Textbook of Practical Pharmacognosy. London: Baillere; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bauer AW, Kirby MDK, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disc diffusion method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berahou A, Auhmani A, Fdil N, Benharref A, Jana M, Gadhi CA. Antibacterial activity of Quercus ilex bark's extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;112(3):426–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Joshi B, Sah GV, Basnet BB, Bhatt MR, Sharma D, Subedi K, Pandey J, Malla R. Phytochemical extraction and antimicrobial properties of different medicinal plants: Ocimum sanctum (Tulsi), Eugenia caryophyllata (Clove), Achyranthes bidentata (Datiwan) and Azadirachta indica (Neem) J Micro Antimicr. 2011;3(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boopathi AC, Sivakumar R. Phytochemical screening studies on the leaves and stem of Andrographis neesiana wight — An endemic medicinal plant from India. World App Sci J. 2011;12(3):307–311. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dahikar SB, Bhutada SA, Tambekar DH, Waghmare SS, Daga VO, Shendge RS. Antibacterial Activity of Whole Plant Extract of Indigofera trita Linn (Leguminose) Natural prod. 2009;5(1) [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davies J. Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Sci. 1994;264(5157):375–382. doi: 10.1126/science.8153624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Duraipandiyan V, Ayyanar M, Ignacimuthu S. Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedical plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India. BMC Compl Alternat Med. 2006;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Adwan G, Salameh Y, Adwan K. Effect of ethanolic extract of Ecballium elaterium against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. Asi Paci Tro Biomed. 2011:456–460. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60100-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sarala G, Shibumon G, Benny PJ. Antimicrobial effect of Punica granatum on pyogenic bacteria. J of Pharma and Biomed Sci. 2010;3(06) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harbourne JB. Phytochemical methods-Guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 2nd Edition. London: Chapman and Hall; 1984. pp. 4–120. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hebert EB, Ellergy WK. Textbook of Practical Pharmacognosy. London: Baillere; 1984. p. 363. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hemaiswarya S, Kruthiventi AK, Doble M. Synergism between natural products and antibiotics against infectious diseases. Phytomed. 2008;15(8):639–652. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2008.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kirtikar KR, Basu BD. Indian Medicinal Plants. 2nd Edn. Dehradun, India: International Book Publishers; 1993. pp. 715–716. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kokate CK, Purohit AD, Gokhale . Pharmacognosy. 1st Edition. Pune: Nirali Prakasan; 1990. p. 123. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kumar JN, Lourthuraj A. In vitro regeneration and phytochemical analysis of Justicia gendarussa. Indian J Innovations Dev. 2012;1(2) [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mahesh B, Satish S. Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant against Plant and Human Pathogens. World J Agri Sci. 2008;4(S):839–843. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Muhammad HS, Muhammad S. The use of Lawsonia inermis Linn. Henna in the management of burn wound infections. Afr J Biotech. 2005;9:934–937. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nadkarni AK. Indian Materials Medica. Vol. 1. Bombay: Popular Prakashan Pvt. Ltd.; 1996. p. 683. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nostro A, Cellini S, Di Bartoolomeo Effects of certain combining extracts (from propolis or Zingiber officinale) with clarithromycin on Helicobacter pyiori. Phytother Res. 2006;20(3):187–190. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Palaniswamy M, Pradeep BV, Sathya R, Angayarkanni J. In vitro anti-plasmodial activity of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. eCAM. 2010;7(4):441–445. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nen030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Parekh J, Chandren S. In vitro antimicrobial activities of extracts of Launaea procumbens Roxb (Labiateae) Afr J Biomed Res. 2006;9:89–93. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Senthilkumar R, Jayakar B, Rajkapoor B. Antitumour Activity of Indigofera trita on Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Induced Mice. Inter J Cancer Res. 2007;3(4):180–185. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Senthilkumar R, Manivannan R, Balasubramanian A, Rajkapoor B. Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Activity of Ethanol Extract of Indigofera trita Linn. On CCl4 Induced Hepatoxicity in Rats. J Pharma Toxi. 2008;3(5):344–350. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ramdas K, Ramachandra YL, Padmalatha S. Antibacterial activity of the leaf extracts of Asparagus racemosus. Geobios. 2006;33:279–280. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Salomao K, Pereira PRS, Campos LC, et al. Brazilian propolis: correlation between chemical composition and antimicrobial activity. Evidence-Based Complemen Alter Medi. 2008;5(3):317–324. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sandhya B, Thomas S, Isabel W, Shenbagarathai R. Ethnomedicinal plants used by the Valiyan community of Piranmallai Hills (Reserved forest), Tamil Nadu, India. A pilot study. Afri J Tradi Complemen Alter Medi. 2006;3:101–114. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sanjappa M. Indigofera trita L. f (Fabaceae: Papilinoideae) complex in India. Bull Bot Surv India. 1984;26:114–119. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saravanan R, Dhachinamoorthi D, Senthilkumar K, Thamizhvanan K. Antimicrobial activity of various extracts from various parts of Calophyllum inophyllum L. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2011;1(3):102–106. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Senthilkumar R, Rajkapoor B, Perumal P, Dhanasekaran T, Alvin Jose M, Jothimanivannan C. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of ethanol extract of Indigofera trita linn. Pharmacologyonline. 2009;1:278–289. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Service RF. Antibiotics that resist resistance. Sci. 1995;270(5237):724–727. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sivakumar R, Alagesaboopathi C. Antimicrobial activity of two different forms of Abrus precatorius L. Ad. Plant Sci. 2006;19(II):409–413. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sukanya SL, Sudisha J, Hariprasad P, Niranjana1 SR, Prakash HS, Fathima SK. Antimicrobial activity of leaf extracts of Indian medicinal plants against clinical and phytopathogenic bacteria. Afr J Biotech, 2009;8(23):6677–6682. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tona L, Kambu K, Ngimbi N, Cimanga K, Vlietinck AJ. Antiamoebic and phytochemical screening of some Congolese medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;61:57–65. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(98)00015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vijayanand S, Hemapriya J. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of peel and seed extracts of Punica granatum L. against selected bacterial strains. Int J Microbiological Res. 2011;1(4):231–234. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vinoth S, Kanna R P, Gurusaravanan P, Jayabalan N. Evolution of phytochemical and antimicrobial and GC-MS analysis of extracts of Indigofera trita L.F. SPP. Subulata (vahl ex poir) Int J Agri Res. 2011;6(4):358–367. [Google Scholar]
