Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 14.
Published in final edited form as: RSC Adv. 2013 Sep 14;3(34):14438–14443. doi: 10.1039/C3RA42033G

Lipid-coated nanoscale coordination polymers for targeted cisplatin delivery

Rachel C Huxford-Phillips, Shane R Russell, Demin Liu, Wenbin Lin a,
PMCID: PMC3777664  NIHMSID: NIHMS500583  PMID: 24058727

Abstract

Nanoscale coordination polymers (NCPs) containing a Pt(IV) cisplatin prodrug, disuccinatocisplatin, were formed by a surfactant-templated synthesis and were shown to have a prodrug loading of 8.2 wt% and a diameter of ~133 nm by dynamic light scattering. These NCPs were stabilized by coating with a DOPC/cholesterol/DSPE-Peg2K lipid layer; a release profile in phosphate buffered saline showed an initial drug release of ~25% within the first hour and no more release observed up to 192 h. The NCP was rendered target-specific for sigma receptors by addition of an AA-DSPE-Peg2K conjugate (AA = anisamide) in the lipid formulation. The AA-containing NCP showed a statistically significant decrease in IC50 (inhibitory concentration, 50%) compared to the non-targeted NCP. Enhanced uptake of the AA-containing NCP was further supported by confocal microscopy and competitive binding assays.

Introduction

Coordination polymers are hybrid materials formed by linking exo-multidentate ligands with metal-connecting points and possess a number of beneficial properties including porosity, high surface areas, and versatile functionalities. As a result, coordination polymers have been explored for a number of applications such as catalysis,13 gas storage,47 nonlinear optics,8 chemical sensing,9 and separations.10, 11 When scaled down to the nano-regime, the resulting nanoscale coordination polymers (NCPs) can not only exhibit the same beneficial properties as their bulk counterparts but also possess interesting functions that are unique to nanomaterials. In particular, because of their synthetic tunability and intrinsic degradability, NCPs have shown great promise in biomedical applications such as diagnostic imaging1216 and drug delivery.1720

Small molecule chemotherapeutics are used to treat many forms of cancer, but their efficacy is compromised by a number of drawbacks, including poor pharmacokinetics, high systemic toxicity, poor patient tolerance, and small therapeutic windows.21 Nanoparticulate therapeutics can overcome many of these drawbacks and preferentially deposit in tumors by taking advantage of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect22 and the ability to actively target cancer cells. The EPR effect results from the ability of nanoparticles to penetrate the leaky vasculatures of tumors and be retained due to poor lymphatic drainage. Cisplatin, one of the three FDA-approved platin chemotherapeutics, is used to treat a variety of cancers but has many side effects such as nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. We are interested in designing novel strategies for targeted cisplatin delivery using NCPs. Although an earlier silica-coated NCP formulation was developed to deliver cisplatin at very high drug loadings, this system suffers from the burst release of significant amounts of drug from the particles.17 Other nanoscale platforms have been developed for cisplatin delivery but suffer from low drug loadings, poor pharmacokinetics, and lower cytotoxicity than the free drug.2330 A PLGA-PEG-based nanoparticle system has been developed for delivery of a cisplatin prodrug and has shown promising efficacy against prostate cancer cells.31, 32 Herein we report the synthesis and characterization of new cisplatin-containing NCPs which have been stabilized by lipid coatings and functionalized with the targeting ligand, anisamide (AA), a small molecule that displays an affinity for sigma receptors (Scheme 1). The present NCP system shows enhanced efficacy compared to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines; increased uptake is further demonstrated by confocal microscopy imaging and competitive binding assays.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Schematic showing the lipid-coated and anisamide-targeted NCP formulations. Cisplatin release from the NCP is presumably triggered by the acidic lysosomal pH followed by in situ reduction of DSCP to cisplatin by endogenous thiol-based reductants such as gluathione.

Results and discussion

We first sought to synthesize a Zr-based NCP containing the Pt(IV) cisplatin prodrug, disuccinatocisplatin (DSCP), in hope of taking advantage of the strong Zr-carboxylate bond.33 Zr-DSCP NCPs (1a) were synthesized by acetone-induced precipitation of a solution of ZrCl4 and DSCP in N,N-dimethylforamide (DMF). Particles of 1a are ~190 nm in diameter by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and 100–200 nm by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Figure 1a). 1a has a high drug loading (27.1 wt%) by inductively-coupled plasma mass sepctrometry (ICP-MS) analysis of Pt, but rapidly releases the cisplatin cargo in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with a half-life (t1/2) of ~30 min. Several attempts to stabilize this material with surface coatings were unsuccessful (SI), presumably due to the strong driving force of 1a to form Zr-phosphate particles in PBS.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

TEM images of (a) 1a and (b) 2a. (c) DLS plots of 2a, 2b, and 2c. (d) Release profiles of 2a and 2b in PBS buffer at 37 °C.

In order to enhance the stability of cisplatin-containing NCPs under biologically relevant conditions, we synthesized a La-DSCP NCP using La(III) ions as the metal-connecting points. Lanthanide ions tend to have a better balance between particle stability and the driving force to form phosphates.19 NCPs of La-DSCP (2a), capped with the lipid, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (DOPA) were prepared by a surfactant-templated heating technique. A water in cyclohexane reverse microemulsion of W = 7.4 (W = water:surfactant molar ratio) containing TritonX-100, 1-hexanol, LaCl3, DSCP, and DOPA was heated in a microwave at 70 °C for 10 min to afford 2a with a diameter of 50–150 nm by TEM (Figure 1b) and ~133 nm by DLS in tetrahydrofuran (THF), with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.12 (Figure 1c, Table 1). 2a has a DSCP loading of 8.2 wt% by ICP-MS. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicates a high amount of organic weight loss for 2a, indicating the presence of the DOPA coating (Figure S8, SI). 2a has a t1/2 of ~35 min in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C.

Table 1.

Characterization Data for DSCP NCPs.

Particle Zavg (nm)a #avg (nm)a PDIa ζ Potential (mV)b Drug Loading (wt%)c
1a 190 169 0.08 −9.8 27.1
2a 133 93 0.12 - 8.2
2b 163 125 0.14 −8.9 -
2c 164 84 0.17 −2.4 -
a

Taken in EtOH for 1a, THF for 2a, and PBS for 2b and 2c.

b

Taken in PBS.

c

Determined by ICP-MS analysis of Pt.

Nanomaterials can be stabilized by lipid coatings.34 2a was coated with a lipid layer composed of cholesterol (chol), 1,2- dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), and 1,2- distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(polyethylene glycol) (DSPE-Peg2K) in a 2:2:1 molar ratio following a reported protocol.35 The size and morphology of lipid-coated NCPs (2b) did not differ from those of 2a by TEM. 2b has a DLS diameter of ~163 nm in PBS, and is highly stable in PBS buffer, with ~25% Pt release within the first hour and no additional release observed up to 192 h. The enhanced stability was supported by time-dependent DLS measurements in the presence of bovine serum albumin in which the particle size only decreases by ~20 nm and the PDI remains constant over 18 h (Figure S15, SI).

2b was also modified with DSPE-Peg2K-AA (where AA is anisamide) to be rendered cancer-specific. AA is a benzamide known to target sigma receptors, which are overexpressed on a number of epithelial tumor cells.3638 AA-modified particles (2c) were prepared by replacing DSPE-Peg2K with DSPE-Peg2K and DSPE-Peg2K-AA in a 9:1 molar ratio during the lipid coating procedure for 2a. 2c has the same size and morphology as 2b and displays similar stability characteristics as 2b by DLS. As cisplatin is the first-line treatment for NSCLC, we subjected two NSCLC lines (NCI-H460 and A549) to in vitro efficacy studies (Figure 2). NCI-H460 cells overexpress the sigma receptor and A549 have lower expression, so studies on A549 cells were used as a negative control.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

IC50 curves showing efficacy of free cisplatin and 2a–c against (a) NCI-H460 and (b) A549 cells. In vitro viability results showing no cytotoxic effects on (c) NCI-H460 and (d) A549 cells after treatment with 3a-c.

In vitro efficacies of 2a-c were determined over 48 h using the trypan blue exclusion assay. In NCI-H460 cells, 2c showed superior efficacy to that of cisplatin with IC50 values of cisplatin = 0.53 ± 0.14 μM, 2a = 5.57 ± 0.40 μM, 2b = 0.67 ± 0.06 μM, and 2c = 0.32 ± 0.03 μM. There is a statistically significant difference between the IC50 values for 2b and 2c by the t test (α ≤ 0.05). Additionally, there was not a statistical difference in efficacy between 2b and 2c in A549 cells by the t test (α = 0.32), likely due to a low level of sigma receptor expression in this cell line. Additionally, analysis by the t test also showed that there was not a significant difference between IC50 values for cisplatin and 2b in either NCI-H460 (α = 0.21) or A549 (α = 0.12) cells.

Control vehicles, La NCP formulations that lack the cisplatin prodrug, were prepared from succinic acid (Suc) using the same synthetic strategies for 2a. The La-Suc particles 3a were lipid-coated (3b) and AA-targeted (3c) using the same method as 2a and display similar size and morphology as the 2a-c. These NCPs were tested against NCI-H460 cells to show that cytotoxicity of 2a-c originates from the cisplatin prodrug, not the La(III) metal or the lipid coating. No cytotoxic effects were observed in the relevant particle concentration range (Figure S21, SI).

Enhanced uptake of AA-targeted formulations was confirmed by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Previously, we have shown that Ru(bpy)32+ is an efficient optical imaging agent.15 Particles of 3c were doped with 10 mol% Ru(bpy)32+ by a surfactant-templated synthesis, and were used for optical imaging by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Particles of Ru(bpy)32+-doped 3a-c were incubated with NCI-H460 cells for 30 min and imaged on a confocal microscope. Images show almost no fluorescence for 3a, as these particles likely disintegrate before they are internalized. Slightly more fluorescence is observed for 3b, but intense fluorescence is observed for 3c, indicating enhanced uptake due to active targeting. Additionally, the mode of uptake was probed by confocal microscopy in which NCI-H460 cells labeled with LysoTracker green were treated with Ru(bpy)32+-doped 3c. Co-localization of the green fluorescence from LysoTracker with red fluorescence from 3c indicates entrapment of the NCPs within lysosomes (Figure 4). In order to further verify enhanced uptake of the targeted particles, competitive binding assays were conducted in which the sigma receptors of NCI-H460 cells were saturated with NH3-Peg5K-AA, then incubated with either 2b or 2c. As shown in Figure 3, the uptakes of both 2b or 2c are the same when the cells have been saturated with an equal amount of NH3-Peg5K-AA, which means that the active targeting ability of 2c is silenced. Additionally, even less 2c uptake is observed when the cells are treated with a higher concentration of NH3-Peg5K-AA. When a similar assay is done with A549 cells, no difference in NCP uptake between cells incubated with 2b or 2c is observed after treatment with NH3-Peg5K-AA (Figure S22, SI).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Laser scanning confocal microscopy images showing co-localization of Ru(bpy)32+-doped 3c (red fluorescence) with lysosomes labeled with LysoTracker green. (a) Red channel only, (b) green channel only, (c) DIC, and (d) overlay of red and green channels. Scale bars = 20 μm.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Laser scanning confocal microscopy images showing DIC (b, d, f, h) and red fluorescence (a, c, e, g) attributed to particle fluroescence: (a, b) control (no particles), (c, d) 2a, (e, f) 2b, and (g, h) 2c. Scale bars = 20 μm. Competitive binding assays with NCI-H460 cells for (i) La content and (j) Pt content.

Conclusions

We have developed a NCP formulation containing a cisplatin prodrug for targeted delivery to non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. The NCP was stabilized with a cholesterol/DOPC/DSPE-Peg lipid coating and made to actively target sigma receptors by doping with a DSPE-Peg-anisamide conjugate. This formulation proved more potent than free cisplatin against NSCLC cell lines, and enhanced uptake was further demonstrated by confocal microscopy and competitive binding assays. The generality of the present strategy should allow the preparation of lipid-coated NCPs containing other chemotherapeutics for efficacious treatment of cancers.

Experimental Section

Materials and General Procedures

All chemicals, unless otherwise noted, were purchased from Fisher Scientific or Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. Cisplatin (for synthesis of DSCP) was purchased from AK Scientific. DOPA, DOPC), and DSPE-Peg2K were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. Cell culturing supplies were purchased from Fisher Scientific. LysoTracker green lysosomal marker was purchased from Life Technologies. Microwave reactions were carried out in a CEM MARS 5 digestion microwave system. SEM images were obtained on a Hitachi 4700 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope, and TEM images were obtained on a JEM 100CX-II Transmission Electron Microscope. A Cressington 108 Auto Sputter Coater equipped with a Au/Pd (80/20) target and MTM-10 thickness monitor was used to coat samples before SEM imaging. SEM micrographs were obtained on glass slides, and TEM micrographs were obtained on carbon-coated copper grids. TGA was performed on a Shimadzu TGA-50 equipped with a platinum pan, and samples were heated at a rate of 3 °C/min under air. Size and zeta potential information was obtained on a Malvern ZetaSizer dynamic light scattering instrument. Fluorescence spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu RF-530PC spectrofluorophotometer. Confocal microscopic images were obtained on glass slides and imaged on the Olympus FlowView confocal microscope at the UNC-CH Microscope and Imaging Facility. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (with the UCSD plugin) and PhotoShop.

Synthesis of Zr-DSCP NCP (1a)

NCPs of 1a were prepared by an acetone-induced precipitation technique. In a 150 mL beaker, 34.8 mg (0.149 mmol) of ZrCl4 was dissolved in 13.5 mL of DMF, followed by the addition of 80.4 mg (0.151 mmol) of DSCP and 270 μL of 3M (0.75 mmol, 5 eq.) acetic acid. Stirring rapidly, ~100 mL acetone was poured into the DMF solution, resulting in a white dispersion which was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, in the dark. The particles were isolated by centrifugation and underwent subsequent wash/centrifugation steps once with acetone and once with ethanol. The particles were dispersed in ethanol. Yield: 24 mg (21.0 %).

Synthesis of La-DSCP@DOPA (2a)

Particles of 2a were prepared by a surfactant-assisted heating method. Two reverse (water in oil) microemulsions were prepared in two 25 mL round bottom flasks by adding 5 mL 0.3 M TritonX-100/1.5 M 1-hexanol in cyclohexane. To one flask was added (while stirring) 200 μL of aq. LaCl3·7H2O at a concentration of 25 mg/mL (5 mg, 0.0135 mmol, pH = 5.5), and to the other flask was added 200 μL of aq. DSCP at a concentration of 25 mg/mL (5 mg, 0.01 mmol, pH = 4) and 30 μL of DOPA in CHCl3 at a concentration of 200 mg/mL (6 mg, 0.008 mmol). Both reverse microemulsions (W = 7.4) became clear instantly, were combined in a microwave vessel, and microwaved at 70 ºC for 10 min using 400 W, 100% power, and a 5 min ramping time. The white product was isolated by centrifugation, subsequently washed/centrifuged once with THF, and dispersed in THF. Yield: 13.5 mg (84.4 %).

Synthesis of La-Suc@DOPA (3a) and Ru(bpy)32+-doped 3a

Particles of 3a were prepared by a similar surfactant-assisted heating method to 2a in 64.3% yield. Particles of 3a doped with Ru(bpy)32+ were prepared by a similar surfactant-templated method except that [Ru(5,5′-CO2H-bpy)(bpy)2](PF6)2 was added to the reverse microemulsion.

Release Profiles

All release profiles were carried out in 5 mM PBS at 37 ºC. This concentration was chosen because it exceeds the blood phosphate concentration. Between 2–4 mg NCPs were prepared in 500 μL PBS or 30 % v/v EtOH/H2O and added to a length of 10K molecular weight cutoff dialysis tubing. The dialysis tubing was submerged in a beaker containing 400 mL 5 mM PBS at 37 ºC. Aliquots of 1 mL each were removed from the beaker at designated time intervals. Samples were digested in concentrated HNO3, diluted with H2O, and analyzed by ICP-MS for Pt content. Pt content (in ppb) was converted to % drug released.

Cytotoxicity Assay of 2a-c against NCI-H460 or A549 Cells

Confluent NCI-H460 or A549 cells were trypsinized and a cell density was obtained from a hemocytometer. Six-well plates were seeded with 5.0x104 cells/well and a total of 3 mL media. Plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 overnight. Amounts of cisplatin or NCP suspensions in RPMI-1640 medium were added to wells, along with additional media, resulting in various cisplatin concentrations (μM). Plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 48 h and viability was determined via the trypan blue exclusion assay.

Viability Assay of 3a-c against A549 Cells

Confluent A549 cells were trypsinized and a cell density was obtained from a hemocytometer. Six-well plates were seeded with 5.0x104 cells/well and a total of 3 mL media. Plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 overnight. Media was removed from wells, and each well was washed with 2 mL PBS. Amounts of NCP suspensions in RPMI-1640 medium were added to wells, along with additional media, resulting in various amounts equivalent to μM cisplatin concentrations tested in the cytotoxicity assays. Plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h and viability was determined via the trypan blue exclusion assay.

Confocal Microscopy Using NCI-H460 Cells

Confluent NCI-H460 cells were trypsinized and counted with a hemocytometer. Glass coverslips were placed in the wells of six-well plates, followed by 2.0x105 cells/well and a total of 3 mL media/well. Plates were incubated at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 overnight. Media was removed from wells, and each well was washed with 2 mL PBS. Amounts of Ru(bpy)32+-doped 3a-c (0.2 mg/well) were added with a total of 2 mL media/well. Wells were incubated at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 for 30 min, media removed, wells washed with 1 mL PBS, and coverslips adhered onto glass slides with antifade mounting medium. Images were obtained on an Olympus FlowView500 confocal microscope.

Co-Localization Assay Using Confocal Microscopy

Confluent NCI-H460 cells were trypsinized and counted with a hemocytometer. Glass coverslips were placed in the wells of six-well plates, followed by 2.0x105 cells/well and a total of 3 mL media/well. Plates were incubated at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 overnight. A 100 nM solution of LysoTracker green lysosomal marker was prepared in RMPI-1640 complete growth medium. Media was removed from wells, and each well was washed with 2 mL PBS. Each well received 3 mL dye solution and incubated for 2 h. Media was removed from wells, and each well was washed with 2 mL PBS. Ru(bpy)32+-doped 3c (0.2 mg/well) was added with a total of 3 mL dye solution per well. Wells were incubated at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 for 1 h, media removed, wells washed with 1 mL PBS, and coverslips adhered onto glass slides with antifade mounting medium. Images were obtained on an Olympus FlowView500 confocal microscope.

Competitive Binding Assay Using NCI-H460 or A549 Cells

Confluent NCI-H460 or A549 cells were trypsinized and counted with a hemocytometer. Five T25 culture flasks were seeded with 1x106 cells/flask and 6 mL of complete growth medium containing FBS. The flasks were incubated at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 for three days, changing the media once during this time. Media was removed from the flasks, and each flask was washed with 2 mL PBS. The flasks were given 3 mL media containing different amounts of NH3-PEG5K-AA and incubated for 30 min. The media was removed, each flask washed with 2 mL PBS, and 0.5 mg 2b or 2c were added to each flask with a total of 6 mL media. The flasks were incubated for 30 min, trypsinized, and cell pellets were digested in concentrated HNO3 for 2 days. Samples were diluted with H2O for a total of 4 mL 2% HNO3 and analyzed by ICP-MS for La and Pt content.

Supplementary Material

ESI

Table 2.

IC50 Values for Cisplatin and DSCP NCPs.

Drug/Particle NCI-H460 Cells IC50 (μM) A549 Cells IC50 (μM)
Cisplatin 0.53±0.14 2.20±0.17
2a 5.57±0.40 5.90±1.03
2b 0.67±0.06 1.20±0.53

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Chris Poon and Dr. Joseph Della Rocca for experimental help. We acknowledge NIH-NCI (U01-CA151455) for financial support.

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [Experimental procedures, SEM and TEM images, IC50 data, and confocal images. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/

References

  • 1.Ma L, Falkowski JM, Abney C, Lin W. Nat Chem. 2010;2:838. doi: 10.1038/nchem.738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee J, Farha OK, Roberts J, Scheidt KA, Nguyen ST, Hupp JT. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:1450. doi: 10.1039/b807080f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wu CD, Hu A, Zhang L, Lin W. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:8940. doi: 10.1021/ja052431t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Furukawa H, Ko N, Go YB, Aratani N, Choi SB, Choi E, Yazaydin AO, Snurr RQ, O’Keeffe M, Kim J, Yaghi OM. Science. 2010;329:424. doi: 10.1126/science.1192160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yuan D, Zhao D, Sun D, Zhou HC. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:5357. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dinca M, Long J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:6766. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bradshaw D, Warren JE, Rosseinsky MJ. Science. 2007;315:977. doi: 10.1126/science.1135445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Evans OR, Lin W. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35:511. doi: 10.1021/ar0001012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Allendorf MD, Houk RJT, Andruszliewicz L, Talin AA, Pikarsky J, Choudhury A, Gall KA, Hesketh PJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14404. doi: 10.1021/ja805235k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.D’Alessandro DM, Smit B, Long JR. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:6058. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xiang SC, Zhang Z, Zhao G, Hong K, Zhao X, Ding DR, Xie MH, Wu CD, Das MC, Gill R, Thomas KM, Chen B. Nat Commun. 2011;2:204. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rieter WJ, Taylor KML, An H, Lin W, Lin W. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9024. doi: 10.1021/ja0627444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Horcajada P, Chalati T, Serre C, Gillet B, Sebrie C, Baati T, Eubank JF, Heurtaux D, Clayette P, Kreuz C, Chang JS, Hwang YK, Marsaud V, Bories PN, Cynober L, Gil S, Ferey G, Couvreur P, Gref R. Nat Mater. 2010;9:172. doi: 10.1038/nmat2608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.deKrafft KE, Xie Z, Cao G, Tran S, Ma L, Zhou OZ, Lin W. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:9901. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu D, Huxford RC, Lin W. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:3696. doi: 10.1002/anie.201008277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang S, Lin X, Blake AJ, Walker GS, Hubberstey P, Champness NR, Schroder M. Nat Chem. 2009;1:487. doi: 10.1038/nchem.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rieter WJ, Pott KM, Taylor KML, Lin W. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:11584. doi: 10.1021/ja803383k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Taylor-Pashow KML, Della Rocca J, Xie Z, Tran S, Lin W. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14261. doi: 10.1021/ja906198y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huxford RC, deKrafft KE, Boyle WS, Liu D, Lin W. Chem Sci. 2012;3:198. doi: 10.1039/C1SC00499A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miller RS, Heurtaux D, Baati T, Horcajada P, Greneche JM, Serre C. Chem Commun. 2010;2010:4526. doi: 10.1039/c001181a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sava G, Bergamo A, Dyson PJ. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:9069. doi: 10.1039/c1dt10522a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Davis ME, Chen Z, Shin DM. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:771. doi: 10.1038/nrd2614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Feazell RP, Nakayama-Ratchford N, Dai H, Lippard SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:8438. doi: 10.1021/ja073231f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Augoustakis K, Beletsi A, Panagi Z, Klepetsnis P, Karydas AG, Ithakissios DS. J Controlled Release. 2002;79:123. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00530-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fujiyama J, Nakase Y, Osaki K, Sakakura C, Yamaagishi H, Hagiwara A. J Controlled Release. 2003;89:397. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(03)00131-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dhar S, Daniel WL, Giljohann DA, Mirkin CA, Lippard SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14652. doi: 10.1021/ja9071282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wan X, Zhang G, Liu S. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2011;32:1082. doi: 10.1002/marc.201100198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wagstaff AJ, Brown SD, Holden MR, Craig GE, Plumb JA, Brown RE, Schreiter N, Chrzanowski W, Wheate NJ. Inorg Chim Acta. 2012;393:328. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kirkpatrick GJ, Plumb JA, Sutcliffe OB, Flint DJ, Wheate NJ. J Inorg Biochem. 2011;105:1115. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pisani MJ, Wheate NJ, Keene FR, Aldrich-Wright JR, Collins JG. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103:373. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dhar S, Gu FX, Langer R, Farokhzad OC, Lippard SJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:17356–17361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809154105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dhar S, Kolishetti N, Lippard SJ, Farokhzad OC. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:1850. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011379108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cavka JH, Jakobsen S, Olsbye U, Guillou NL, Bordiga CS, Lillerud KP. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:13850. doi: 10.1021/ja8057953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li J, Chen YC, Tseng YC, Mozumdar S, Huang L. J Controlled Release. 2010;142:416. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li J, Yang Y, Huang L. J Controlled Release. 2012;158:108. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kashiwagi H, McDunn JE, Simon PO, Goedegebuure PS, Xu J, Jones L, Chang K, Johnston F, Trinkhaus K, Hotchkiss RS, Mach RH, Hawkins WG. Mol Cancer. 2007;6:48. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-6-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vilner BJ, John CS, Bowen WD. Cancer Res. 1995;55:408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ganapathy ME, Prasad PD, Huang W, Seth P, Leibach FH, Ganapathy V. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;289:251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES