Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with an unknown etiology. The clinical disease course is variable, with the majority of patients experiencing reversible episodes of neurological disability in the third or fourth decade of life, eventually followed by a state of irreversible progression. Continuous axonal and neuronal loss is thought to be the major cause of this progression. Over the last decade, extensive research has targeted the grey matter and its role in MS pathogenesis. While pathological and imaging studies have begun to reveal important clues about the role of cortical pathology, gene expression studies in MS cortex are still emerging. Microarray-based comparative gene expression profiling provides a snapshot of genes underlying a particular condition and has been performed using brain tissues from patients with progressive MS. In this review, we summarize existing data from gene expression changes in cortical tissues from MS brains and how they may provide clues to the pathogenesis.
Keywords: MS, microarray, neuron, cortex, demyelination
Introduction to cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the major cause of non-traumatic neurological disability in young adults in North America and Europe, affecting over 2.5 million individuals worldwide1,2. MS is a complex disease whose cause includes a genetic predisposition for susceptibility and environmental influences. Although historically considered a white matter disease, recent advancements in MS research have provided evidence of significant cortical involvement in the pathogenesis with the cortex even having higher lesion load than white matter1,3,4,5. Overall cortical lesion burden might affect disability progression as it positively correlates with disease duration, higher EDSS scores and increased cortical atrophy.. Demyelinating cortical lesions are found predominantly in the frontal and temporal cortex, but with reports of demyelination also in the thalamus, basal ganglia, hypothalamus, hippocampus, cerebellum, and grey matter of the spinal cord3,6. Demyelination in the cortex is usually associated with the progressive phase of the disease, correlating with the degree of clinical disability3,5. Based on the pattern of demyelination, three main types of cortical lesions have been described7. Type I or leukocortical lesions are areas of demyelination that contiguously include both cerebral cortex and subcortical white matter. These are informative lesions to study because the white and grey matter portions are of similar ages, making any differences detected due to the environment in which demyelination is occurring. Type II cortical lesions are small perivascular areas of demyelination and do not contribute significantly to cortical lesion load. Type III, or subpial lesions, are bands of demyelination that extend from the pial surface, stopping at cortical layer 3 or 4 and often occupying several gyri. These are the most common grey matter lesions in MS brains1. Some Type III lesions may traverse the entire width of the cortex and have been referred to as Type IV cortical lesions8.
Large scale gene expression profiling provides an unbiased search for candidate genes and pathways altered in MS. Gene expression profiling studies to date have been predicated on the traditional model of MS as a disease where the peripheral immune system targets the white matter. Studies have compared both peripheral blood mononuclear cells and immune cell subsets from MS patients, focusing on patients with relapsing-remitting disease9,10. The majority of autopsy studies have looked at the white matter in MS brains. Recent thinking in MS, however, has been directed towards determining the cause of neurological dysfunction in late stage progressive MS11, where systemic immune responses may be less important and current anti-inflammatory drugs show little benefit. It is in this progressive phase that cortical pathology may be more associated with neurological dysfunction. Examining the genetic substrate of cortical pathology in MS brains should therefore provide a unique opportunity to determine the cause of this neurological dysfunction. Gene expression changes in cortical tissues from MS patients are emerging and Table 1 summarizes major findings of these studies to date.
Table 1.
TISSUE | BRAIN AREA/SAMPLE TYPE | COMPARATIVE TOOL | Q-PCR | FINDING | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 MS (SP, PP) 6 Ctl |
Motor cortex Frozen |
Affymetrix HG-U133A,B ~39,000 probes | Yes | Non-lesioned motor cortex from MS brains was compared to control motor cortex. Major findings include decreases in genes related to mitochondrial function and inhibitory neurotransmission. These results provide a mechanism of axonal degeneration through energy imbalance. In the same dataset, genes from the CNTF-mediated neuroprotective signaling pathway were increased, possibly reflecting an endogenous neuroprotective response. |
13 20 |
6 MS (SP, PR, NA) 8 Ctl |
Cerebral Cortex Frozen |
Applied Biosystems Human Genome Survey Microarray v1.0 ~31,700 probes | Yes | Non-lesioned and lesioned cortex from MS brains was compared to control cortex. No genes were found to be significantly different between MS lesioned and non-lesioned cortex. Compared to controls, 532 genes were altered in MS cortex. Major findings of the study include increased mRNA levels of IgG-related genes, possibly due to meningeal plasma cells that are not infected by Epstein-Barr virus. | 26 |
8 MS (SP, PP) 4 Ctl |
Hippocampus Frozen |
Affymetrix HG-U133A ~13,000 probes | Yes | Non-lesioned MS hippocampus was compared to lesioned MS and control hippocampus. There were 799 genes significantly altered between non-lesioned and lesioned hippocampus. A significant loss of neurons was not reported. Major findings of the study include decreases in mRNA and proteins belonging to axonal transport, glutamate neurotransmission, synaptic maintenance and memory/learning. | 43 |
3 MS (SP) 3 Ctl |
Frontal Cortex Frozen |
Custom PCR array containing 92 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases (PTPs) | NA | PTP levels in white matter and grey matter non-lesioned and lesioned tissues were compared. 52 PTPs were altered in MS white matter compared to 9 in grey matter. The study identified VHY/Dusp15 as a regulator of oligodendrocyte differentiation. | 40 |
3 MS (SP) 3 TM 3 AD 3 Ctl |
Frontal/Parietal/Temporal cortex Paraffin embedded |
Agilent-Whole-Human Genome Microarrays ~ 41000 probes | Yes | Cortical lesions were divided into 1 active lesion and 2 chronic active lesions. MS cases were compared to all remaining samples (Tuberous meningitis, Alzheimer’s disease and control). One of the major aspects of this study was identifying 109 genes specific to MS and belonging to inflammation, cell death, DNA repair, transcription and translation. Although statistical analysis could not be performed, comparison of one single MS case (active lesion) with remaining samples (MS cortex, Tuberculous meningitis, Alzheimer’s disease and control cortex) led to changes in similar biological categories. | 31 |
SP: secondary progressive MS; PP: Primary progressive MS; Ctl: control; PR: Progressive relapsing; NA: not available TM: Tuberculous meningitis AD: Alzheimer’s disease; Q-PCR: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Gene expression studies in normal appearing cortex
Existing studies looking at MS normal appearing white matter (NAWM) have shown that there are pathological and gene changes in MS NAWM compared to control white matter tissues1,9,10,12. Extending the same thinking to the grey matter, gene changes have been studied in normal appearing motor cortex tissue isolated from MS brains and healthy controls13. In line with the demonstration of similar levels of myelin immunostaining, mRNAs of myelin genes were not significantly different between MS patients and controls. The results do, however, identify significant decrease in genes belonging to two broad biological categories: oxidative phosphorylation and GABAergic neurotransmission.
Firstly, in the category of oxidative phosphorylation, a significant reduction in mRNA of nuclear encoded mitochondrial genes was observed, translating into decreased protein expression. Decrease in both mRNA and protein expression was accompanied by functional reduction in respiratory chain complexes I and III. These results offer a mechanism for the axonal degeneration observed in progressive MS patients. Due to the redistribution of Na+ channels and the resulting increased influx of sodium, ATP consumption is greatly increased in demyelinated axons14,15. To compensate for the higher energy demand, mitochondria migrate to the demyelinated axoplasm but have decreased respiratory capacity as found from the mRNA, protein and functional data. The combination of an axon with increased energy demands and a mitochondrial population less able to meet those demands may therefore trigger premature axonal degeneration. This imbalance in energy needs may be further compounded by the fact that, in addition to defects in the expression of nuclear encoded protein and mRNA, neurons in progressive MS, irrespective of the location and pathology, harbor increased levels of mitochondrial DNA deletions18. These results suggest that neuronal and axonal mitochondria pathology is prominent in MS tissues and may play a critical role in neuronal degeneration and MS pathogenesis.
In contrast to the predicted deleterious effect of the gene changes in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway, the changes in the GABAergic inhibitory neurotransmission pathway may be beneficial. Reduced inhibitory innervations up-regulate neuroprotective pathways in murine cortex19. Decreased expression of the GABAergic genes coupled with increased expression of neurotrophic genes could therefore be part of the endogenous defense mechanism mounted by the MS brain. In the same dataset, increased ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) signaling was found in motor neurons from non-lesioned motor cortex. CNTF is an established neurotrophic factor that enhances neuronal survival during development and in disease. Translational and transcriptional products of CNTF-related genes were quantified and localized in control and MS cortices20. An active and functionally significant role for CNTF in MS patients is supported by the report that MS patients with CNTF-null mutations have an earlier disease onset and a more aggressive disease course21. The microarray based expression profiling studies and downstream validations described here therefore provide important insights into the disease pathogenesis.
Gene expression studies in cortical lesions
Gene expression studies in cortical lesions have focused on mechanisms associated with either the formation of cortical lesions or remyelination. Classically, cortical lesions derived from autopsy studies have shown an absence of infiltrating inflammatory cells and no disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Recently, however, using biopsy materials from acute MS patients, inflammatory cortical lesions have been reported22. The pathogenic role of acute cortical lesions and the reasons they cannot be detected with routine MRI procedures are still to be ascertained.
Meningeal inflammation and B cell-like follicles, increasingly appreciated as pathological features of MS, have sometimes been associated with cortical lesions23–25. The role of meningeal B-cells in cortical pathology was explored in one of the first gene expression studies using cortical lesions26. Comparing cortical and meningeal tissues isolated from 6 MS and 8 control patients, significant increases in levels of IgG genes as well as IgG deposition were detected in the meningeal layers of MS brains. No genes were found to be different between lesioned and non-lesioned cortical samples, possibly due to the heterogeneity of the samples and/or batch effects interfering with the results. Despite the upregulation of IgG genes in the brains of MS patients, there was no corresponding upregulation of FcR genes, which bind to IgGs in white matter26. The authors concluded that the upregulation of IgG related genes and not FcRs probably reflected increased secretion of IgG from plasma cells, rather than B-cell accumulation26. Although some reports have detected the presence of Epstein Barr virus (EBV) in meningeal B-cells that correlate with cortical lesions27,28, using PCR techniques on DNA isolated from brains of MS patients, no EBV sequences were detected. While there is a significant association between EBV and MS, the link between B cell-like follicles infected by EBV and cortical lesions remains to be established29,30.
In a more recent study, the gene expression of one active and two chronic active MS cortical lesions was compared to cortical samples from three patients with tuberculous meningitis (representing an inflammatory meningeal condition), three with Alzheimer’s disease (representing a neurodegenerative condition), and three controls31. Despite the use of formalin-fixed tissue for RNA measurements (offering less optimal sample quality compared to fresh-frozen tissues), the identified cortical gene changes were highly specific to MS. The comparison between the single acute cortical lesion and the remaining samples showed, among others, increased expression of immune related genes, which supports the rationale for further investigation of these extremely rare autopsy cases with active cortical lesions22,31. Comparing MS cortical tissues with all other samples (tuberculous meningitis, Alzheimer’s disease and control cortex), several key biological pathways that could play a role in cortical MS pathology were identified including cell death, DNA damage, regulation of transcription, cell survival, and axonal and synaptic biology. The biological category of oxidative damage was also identified and oxidized lipids were localized to apoptotic neurons31. The presence of apoptotic neurons has been previously described in cortical lesions7 although the mechanisms that lead to neuronal death in MS still remain to be established.
The restoration of myelin, or remyelination, is among the best known neuroprotective strategies1,32. It is a spontaneous process that occurs both in experimental models and MS brains33–38. A recent study in MS brains found enhanced reparative capacity of cortical lesions compared to white matter lesions39. Direct comparison of remyelination in Type I (leukocortical) lesions found 86% greater remyelination in grey matter compared to white matter. Interestingly, this repair process appeared to be ongoing, as the number of actively-myelinating oligodendrocytes (oligodendrocytes within cortical lesions with PLP-positive cell bodies and processes extending to short internodes) in the cortex was six times greater than in white matter39. Increases in hyaluronan and associated molecules have been shown to inhibit maturation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and remyelination38. To analyze the difference in this propensity for remyelination, mRNA and protein levels of GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein), CD44, and versican (a hyaluronan-binding protein) were measured. Increases in mRNA and protein levels were detected in the white matter portion of leukocortical lesions compared to cortical portions. These findings suggest that cortical lesions have a more conducive environment for repair and remyelination38,39. Simultaneous analysis of cortical and white matter tissue could therefore reveal important regulators of remyelination in MS. In one such comparison, PCR-based screening of 92 phoshotyrosine phosphatase mRNAs revealed DUSPY15/VHY as an inhibitor of oligodendrocyte maturation40, which is increased in MS lesions compared to controls. These studies support the utility of unbiased expression profiling as a reliable tool to understand molecular changes underlying cortical pathology.
Gene expression studies in MS hippocampus
The hippocampus is among the non-neocortical regions that are extensively demyelinated in progressive MS41–43. Cognitive dysfunction occurs in greater than 50% of MS patients, affecting episodic learning and memory, information processing speed, and working memory. Imaging and pathological studies support the possibility that hippocampal demyelination contributes to cognitive decline in MS patients44,45. Hippocampal demyelination is a prominent feature of post mortem MS brains, with 50–80% of hippocampi showing some degree of demyelination41,42. In our analysis, 12 of the 22 hippocampi analyzed were significantly demyelinated43. An encouraging observation was the retention of 80% or more of neurons in demyelinated hippocampi. This identifies the demyelinated hippocampal neuron as a promising therapeutic target. Despite the minimum neuronal loss, demyelinated hippocampi had a 40% decrease in synaptic densities and decreased expression of neuronal mRNA and proteins associated with axonal transport, glutamate neurotransmission, glutamate homeostasis, and memory and learning43. These data support the concept that demyelination alters neuronal gene expression and synaptic connectivity43. If reduced synaptic densities are a general consequence of demyelination, it could contribute to cortical atrophy and to the continuous neurological decline seen in the progressive stages of MS. Memory function was also impaired in an animal model of hippocampal demyelination46 with the majority of gene changes similar to those measured in MS demyelinated hippocampus. In addition, gene regulatory microRNAs have been identified in MS and rodent hippocampus that were shown to target altered genes and change their mRNA expression following demyelination46. The results support the hypothesis that microRNAs may alter neuronal gene function following demyelination.. Using rodent model of hippocampal demyelination, it was shown that remyelination abolished the memory dysfunction caused by demyelination46. Mechanistic insight into regulatory function of these miRNAs could lead to development of therapeutic options targeted to enhancing neuronal function.
Conclusions
The genetic complexity of MS provides an ideal platform for the application of gene expression profiling studies. The few gene-related studies using cortical tissues from MS brains provide evidence of mitochondrial and oxidative damage, impaired axonal transport, synaptic dysfunction, impaired neurotransmission, and increased cell death pathways in MS cortical neurons. Additionally, gene-related studies have also identified and validated increased neuroprotective pathways and remyelination efficiency in cortical lesions. This technology should now be applied specifically to compare pathological changes between normal and demyelinated cortex as well as between the relapsing-remitting and progressive disease courses. This is of paramount importance since the underlying mechanisms of cortical demyelination and associated changes are currently unknown. Cortical changes may also be retrogradely influenced by alterations in the spinal cord. Comparative gene changes in spinal cord coupled with proteomic approaches would therefore provide critical clues to disease progression and how downstream changes affect cortical pathology. Advancements in newer RNA sequencing studies to determine gene changes have also been applied to MS research47. These tools should now be applied to determine RNA changes in MS cortical neurons. Recognizing the limitations of any technology is important for successful implementation. Microarray data therefore need to be validated using independent methods, preferably in independent cohorts of samples, to reconfirm the results. Investigators should avoid experiments lacking downstream validation, or using, unsuitable or inadequately characterized biological material. Once quality control measures are followed, studies can be reliably compared between laboratories. Human tissue is not amenable to manipulation, thus efforts should be directed towards the development of animal models that mimic the cortical pathology observed in MS patients. Future research into regulatory factors such as transcription factors, microRNAs and epigenetic modifications that control gene expression in MS should also be undertaken. Finally, integration of pathology, neuroimaging and genomic research will be critical in having a comprehensive understanding of the cortical pathology in MS.
Acknowledgments
The review contains work supported by National MS Society, USA (RG-4280), and National Institute of health, USA (NINDS-NS35058). The author would like to Christopher Nelson for assisting with editing of the review article.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
None
References
- 1.Trapp BD, Nave KA. Multiple sclerosis: an immune or neurodegenerative disorder? Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:247–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stys PK, Zamponi GW, van MJ, et al. Will the real multiple sclerosis please stand up? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:507–514. doi: 10.1038/nrn3275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Geurts JJ, Calabrese M, Fisher E, et al. Measurement and clinical effect of grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:1082–1092. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70230-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dutta R, Trapp BD. Pathogenesis of axonal and neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2007;68:S22–S31. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000275229.13012.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Geurts JJ, Barkhof F. Grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:841–851. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70191-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kutzelnigg A, Lucchinetti CF, Stadelmann C, et al. Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2005;128:2705–2712. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Peterson JW, Bo L, Mork S, et al. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons and reduced inflammation in cortical MS lesions. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:389–400. doi: 10.1002/ana.1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bo L, Vedeler CA, Nyland H, et al. Intracortical multiple sclerosis lesions are not associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration. Mult Scler. 2003;9:323–331. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms917oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kinter J, Zeis T, Schaeren-Wiemers N. RNA profiling of MS brain tissues. Int MS J. 2008;15:51–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dutta R, Trapp BD. Gene expression profiling in multiple sclerosis brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45:108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fox RJ, Thompson A, Baker D, et al. Setting a research agenda for progressive multiple sclerosis: the International Collaborative on Progressive MS. Mult Scler. 2012;18:1534–1540. doi: 10.1177/1352458512458169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lassmann H. Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: inflammation versus neurodegeneration. Brain. 2012;135:2904–2905. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dutta R, McDonough J, Yin X, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a cause of axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:478–489. doi: 10.1002/ana.20736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Waxman SG. Mechanisms of disease: sodium channels and neuroprotection in multiple sclerosis-current status. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:159–169. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Trapp BD, Stys PK. Virtual hypoxia and chronic necrosis of demyelinated axons in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:280–291. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70043-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mahad DJ, Ziabreva I, Campbell G, et al. Mitochondrial changes within axons in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2009;132:1161–1174. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lassmann H, van HJ, Mahad D. Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:647–656. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campbell GR, Mahad DJ. Clonal expansion of mitochondrial DNA deletions and the progression of multiple sclerosis. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2012;11:589–597. doi: 10.2174/187152712801661194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen Z, Jalabi W, Shpargel KB, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation and neuroprotection against experimental brain injury is independent of hematogenous TLR4. J Neurosci. 2012;32:11706–11715. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0730-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dutta R, McDonough J, Chang A, et al. Activation of the ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) signalling pathway in cortical neurons of multiple sclerosis patients. Brain. 2007;130:2566–2576. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Giess R, Maurer M, Linker R, et al. Association of a null mutation in the CNTF gene with early onset of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:407–409. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.3.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lucchinetti CF, Popescu BF, Bunyan RF, et al. Inflammatory cortical demyelination in early multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2188–2197. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Choi SR, Howell OW, Carassiti D, et al. Meningeal inflammation plays a role in the pathology of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2012;135:2925–2937. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kooi EJ, Geurts JJ, van HJ, et al. Meningeal inflammation is not associated with cortical demyelination in chronic multiple sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68:1021–1028. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181b4bf8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Magliozzi R, Howell O, Vora A, et al. Meningeal B-cell follicles in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis associate with early onset of disease and severe cortical pathology. Brain. 2007;130:1089–1104. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Torkildsen O, Stansberg C, Angelskar SM, et al. Upregulation of immunoglobulin-related genes in cortical sections from multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:720–729. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2009.00343.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Magliozzi R, Serafini B, Rosicarelli B, et al. B-cell enrichment and epstein-barr virus infection in inflammatory cortical lesions in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72:29–41. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31827bfc62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Serafini B, Rosicarelli B, Franciotta D, et al. Dysregulated Epstein-Barr virus infection in the multiple sclerosis brain. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2899–2912. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pakpoor J, Giovannoni G, Ramagopalan SV. Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis: association or causation? Expert Rev Neurother. 2013;13:287–297. doi: 10.1586/ern.13.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lassmann H, Niedobitek G, Aloisi F, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in the multiple sclerosis brain: a controversial issue--report on a focused workshop held in the Centre for Brain Research of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Brain. 2011;134:2772–2786. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fischer MT, Wimmer I, Hoftberger R, et al. Disease-specific molecular events in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain. 2013 doi: 10.1093/brain/awt110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Franklin RJ, ffrench-Constant C, Edgar JM, et al. Neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:624–634. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Albert M, Antel J, Bruck W, et al. Extensive cortical remyelination in patients with chronic multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2007;17:129–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2006.00043.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Franklin RJ. Why does remyelination fail in multiple sclerosis? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:705–714. doi: 10.1038/nrn917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kipp M, Victor M, Martino G, et al. Endogeneous remyelination: findings in human studies. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2012;11:598–609. doi: 10.2174/187152712801661257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Patani R, Balaratnam M, Vora A, et al. Remyelination can be extensive in multiple sclerosis despite a long disease course. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2007;33:277–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stadelmann C, Bruck W. Interplay between mechanisms of damage and repair in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2008;255 (Suppl 1):12–18. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-1003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Staugaitis SM, Chang A, Trapp BD. Cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis: experimental approaches to studies on the mechanisms of demyelination and remyelination. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2012:97–102. doi: 10.1111/ane.12041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chang A, Staugaitis SM, Dutta R, et al. Cortical remyelination: A new target for repair therapies in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:918–926. doi: 10.1002/ana.23693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schmidt F, van den Eijnden M, Pescini GR, et al. Identification of VHY/Dusp15 as a regulator of oligodendrocyte differentiation through a systematic genomics approach. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Papadopoulos D, Dukes S, Patel R, et al. Substantial archaeocortical atrophy and neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2009;19:238–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00177.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Geurts JJ, Bo L, Roosendaal SD, et al. Extensive hippocampal demyelination in multiple sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66:819–827. doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e3181461f54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dutta R, Chang A, Doud MK, et al. Demyelination causes synaptic alterations in hippocampi from multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:445–454. doi: 10.1002/ana.22337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hulst HE, Steenwijk MD, Versteeg A, et al. Cognitive impairment in MS: impact of white matter integrity, gray matter volume, and lesions. Neurology. 2013;80:1025–1032. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Roosendaal SD, Moraal B, Vrenken H, et al. In vivo MR imaging of hippocampal lesions in multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:726–731. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dutta R, Chomyk AM, Chang A, et al. Hippocampal demyelination and memory dysfunction are associated with increased levels of the neuronal microRNA miR-124 and reduced AMPA receptors. Ann Neurol. 2013 doi: 10.1002/ana.23860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Baranzini SE, Mudge J, van Velkinburgh JC, et al. Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2010;464:1351–1356. doi: 10.1038/nature08990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]