Skip to main content
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
letter
. 2013 Aug 16;37(10):2089–2090. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2062-7

Did you notice the tibial nutrient artery when applying external fixation?

Ye Peng 1, Ming Hao 1, Hua Chen 1, Lihai Zhang 1, Peifu Tang 1,
PMCID: PMC3779580  PMID: 23949093

Dear Editor,

We read with deep interest the article by Tong et al. [1]. We appreciate the work of the authors on the paper. However, Figs. 2 and 3 made us interested in the position of external fixation of the pilon fracture given by the authors. The authors stated Figs. 2 and 3 indicated that the three 4.5-mm pins were usually applied on the anterior surface of the proximal tibia. We found something interesting when following the instructions at our clinic. In one patient, the proximal pins of the external fixation nearly penetrated the tibial nutrient artery (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The CT scan shows that the tibial nutrient artery (white arrow) was nearly damaged by the proximal pin of external fixation

According to previous studies, most people have only one tibial nutrient artery which supplies the inner two thirds of the cortex and is the chief blood supply of cortical bone [2]. It arises from the anterior aspect of the posterior tibial artery, very close to the origin of the latter from the popliteal artery. The nutrient artery then penetrates the tibialis posterior muscle close to its origin from bone. It enters a groove on the posterior surface of the tibia, leading distally to the very oblique nutrient canal which in man may traverse the cortex for a distance of 5.5 cm [3, 4].

The proximal pins of external fixation have a higher probability of penetrating the tibial nutrient artery especially from the anterior surface of one third to two thirds of the tibia. The blood supply of the tibia will have been damaged in the fractures. If the tibial nutrient artery were to be damaged as well, the incidence of nonunion or delayed union of tibia fractures will increase significantly.

To summarise, we advocate that the proximal pins of external fixation should be fixed from a lateral and not an anterior approach. In this way, the tibial nutrient artery can be protected and the incidence of nonunion or delayed union of fractures can be decreased.

This interesting finding cannot lessen this review’s overall value and we thoroughly enjoyed reading and appreciating the paper.

Contributor Information

Ye Peng, Email: dr_pengye@163.com.

Peifu Tang, Email: pftang301@126.com.

References

  • 1.Tong D, Ji F, Zhang H, Ding W, Wang Y, Cheng P, et al. Two-stage procedure protocol for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique in the treatment of the complex pilon fracture. Int Orthop. 2012;36(4):833–837. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1434-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rhinelander FW. Circulation of bone. In: Bourne GH, editor. The biochemistry and physiology of bone, 2nd edn. Physiology and pathology, vol 2. New York: Academic; 1972. pp. 2–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rhinelander FW. Tibial blood supply in relation to fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;105:34–81. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197411000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Standring S (2008) Gray’s anatomy, 40th edn. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES