Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1969 Sep;18(3):303–306. doi: 10.1128/am.18.3.303-306.1969

In Vitro Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Carbenicillin and the Combination of Carbenicillin and Gentamicin

John P Phair 1,2, Chatrchai Watanakunakorn 1,2, Thomas Bannister 1,2
PMCID: PMC377973  PMID: 4984762

Abstract

One hundred and eleven strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical material were studied for susceptibility to carbenicillin. Of the strains, 80% were inhibited by 125 μg/ml or more. The combination of carbenicillin and gentamicin was shown to have inhibitory and bactericidal synergistic effect on 15 of 16 strains of P. aeruginosa tested. There was poor correlation between the single-disc sensitivity method and the tube dilution method.

Full text

PDF
303

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAUER A. W., PERRY D. M., KIRBY W. M. Single-disk antibiotic-sensitivity testing of staphylococci; an analysis of technique and results. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1959 Aug;104(2):208–216. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1959.00270080034004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodey G. P., Terrell L. M. In vitro activity of carbenicillin against gram-negative bacilli. J Bacteriol. 1968 May;95(5):1587–1590. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.5.1587-1590.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DOGGETT R. G., HARRISON G. M., WALLIS E. S. COMPARISON OF SOME PROPERTIES OF PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA ISOLATED FROM INFECTIONS IN PERSONS WITH AND WITHOUT CYSTIC FIBROSIS. J Bacteriol. 1964 Feb;87:427–431. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.2.427-431.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jawetz E. The use of combinations of antimicrobial drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1968;8:151–170. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.08.040168.001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knudsen E. T., Rolinson G. N., Sutherland R. Carbenicillin: a new semisynthetic penicillin active against Pseudomonas pyocyanea. Br Med J. 1967 Jul 8;3(5557):75–78. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5557.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Petersdorf R. G., Sherris J. C. Methods and significance of in vitro testing of bacterial sensitivity to drugs. Am J Med. 1965 Nov;39(5):766–779. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(65)90096-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sabath L. D., McCall C. E., Steigbigel N. H., Finland M. Synergistic penicillin combinations for treatment of human urinary-tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1966;6:149–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith C. B., Finland M. Carbenicillin: activity in vitro and absorption and excretion in normal young men. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Nov;16(11):1753–1760. doi: 10.1128/am.16.11.1753-1760.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Watanakunakorn C., Goldberg L. M., Carleton J., Hamburger M. Staphylococcal spheroplasts and L colonies. IV. Antimicrobial susceptibility of stable methicillin-induced and lysostaphin-induced spheroplasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1968;8:382–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Watanakunakorn C., Hamburger M. Induction of spheroplasts of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by carbenicillin. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Jun;17(6):935–937. doi: 10.1128/am.17.6.935-937.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES