Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Lett. 2008 Aug 9;272(1):32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.06.022

Polymorphisms of p21 and p27 Jointly Contribute to an Earlier Age at Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Jinyun Chen 1, Ann M Killary 2,6, Subrata Sen 3,6, Christopher I Amos 1,6, Douglas B Evans 4, James L Abbruzzese 5, Marsha L Frazier 1,6
PMCID: PMC3780599  NIHMSID: NIHMS78963  PMID: 18694622

Abstract

p21 and p27, members of the kinase inhibitor protein (KIP) family, bind to cyclin-CDK complexes to inhibit their catalytic activity and induce cell cycle arrest. The purpose of our study was to identify whether the p21 (C-to-A), and p27 (T-to-G) polymorphisms were associated with age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, either independently or jointly. 205 patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were genotyped for the p21 and p27 polymorphisms. We found patients with the p21 variant genotype (CA/AA) had an earlier age at diagnosis than those with the wild-type genotype (CC) (Log-rank, P=0.001; HR=1.89; 95%CI, 1.28–2.78). The p21 and p27 polymorphisms combined had a joint effect on age-associated risk for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (Log-rank, P=0.004; HR=2.91; 95%CI, 1.49–5.67). Our findings suggest that the p21 polymorphism independently and p21 and p27 polymorphisms jointly contribute to a significantly earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Keywords: p21, p27, polymorphisms, pancreatic cancer, age of diagnosis

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States [1]. The median survival time for all patients diagnosed is less than six months with a 3% five-year survival [2]. Because early pancreatic cancer does not have any specific symptoms, tumors often go undetected until they have already spread beyond the pancreas, resulting in the worst prognosis of all solid tumors. Thus, it is of critical importance to identify biomarkers that would enable the early detection of this disease and that would allow a greater percentage of patients to undergo curative surgery.

Alterations in cell cycle regulation genes are commonly found in human neoplasia, including pancreatic cancer. Progression through the cell cycle depends on the activation of cyclins and cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) which function together in the G1 phase for initiating S-phase and progression to G2/M phases. The activity of cyclin-CDK complexes is regulated by p21 and p27, members of the kinase inhibitor protein (KIP) family that can arrest the cell by inhibiting DNA replication [3]. p21 negatively regulates cell cycle progression by inhibiting CDK2/4 and blocks DNA replication by binding to PCNA [4]. p27 inhibits the CDK2-cyclin E complex by regulating the checkpoint at the G1 to S transition in normal cells. When p27 is absent, cells do not follow cell cycle control signs and thus proliferate in an exaggerated way [5]. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (C-to-A) in p21 results in an amino acid change in codon 31 from Serine to Arginine. This polymorphism is located in a highly conserved region of p21 and is expected to affect its molecular function [6]. The single nucleotide polymorphism (T-to-G) in p27 is located at codon 109 and results in an amino acid substitution of valine for glycine. This V109G polymorphism may have an effect on p27 degradation [7].

Given the major roles that p21 and p27 play in cell cycle checkpoint regulation, we hypothesized that polymorphisms in the two genes may interact or work together to influence the finely tuned mechanisms of cell cycle regulation. This might influence age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as well as the dissemination and metastasis of the disease. In this study, on a consecutive series of 205 pancreatic cancer patients, we obtained evidence that the p21 polymorphism is associated with an earlier age at diagnosis with pancreatic cancer and that p21 and p27 polymorphisms jointly contribute to an earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. We previously reported that cell cycle genes, Aurora-A and p16 polymorphisms contributed to an earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer [8]. Therefore we also investigate whether these polymorphisms along with those of p21 and p27 jointly contribute to an earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Materials and Methods

Study subjects

The study included 205 consecutively registered patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas evaluated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas from February 1999 to October 2004. At recruitment, each participant gave written informed consent. The data that we obtained from participants included their age at diagnosis, ethnicity, and gender. The presence (M1) or absence (M0) of detectable metastases at diagnosis was determined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification for pancreatic cancer (11). Each study subject contributed blood from which DNA was extracted with an AUTOPURE LS Automated DNA Purification Instrument (Gentra Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Polymorphism analysis

Genotypes of p21 C-to-A (dbSNP: rs1801270) and p27 G-to-T (dbSNP: rs2066827) were analyzed by pyrosequencing as according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biotage, Inc., Foxboro, MA). A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on 5 ng DNA in a 50 μL reaction mixture containing 50 mM KCl; 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3); 2.0 mM MgCl2; 0.125 mM dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 1.5 U AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, NJ); and 10 pmol of each primer (Sigma/Genosys, The Woodlands, TX). The PCR reaction mixture was initially incubated at 95°C for 6 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 63°C for 30 s for p21 and 65°C for 30s for p27 followed by 72°C for 15 s, and then an extension of 72°C for 5 min. The PCR primers used were 5′-CTCTTCGGCCCAGTGGACA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTCACGGGCCTCCTGGAT-3′ (reverse) for p21, 5′-CGAGTGGCAAGAGGTGGAGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGAGCCCCAATTAAAGGCG-3′ (reverse) for p27. The forward primer was biotinylated for p21 and the reverse primer was biotinylated for p27 to allow subsequent immobilization on magnetic bead. The sequencing primers were 5′-AGCGCATCACAGTCG-3′ (Sigma Genosys) for p21 and 5′-CAGGAGAGCCAGGAT-3′ for p27. 20 samples for each polymorphism were randomly selected and repeated with 100 % concordance and the genotypes were read independently by two different persons.

The Aurora-A T-to-A (dbSNP: rs2273535) and p16 C-to-T (dbSNP: rs3088440) polymorphisms were assayed as described previously [8].

Statistical analysis

We tested the association between age at diagnosis and genotype by comparing Kaplan-Meier curves according to genotype. The log-rank test was used to evaluate the homogeneity of the Kaplan-Meier curves by genotype. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was then used to estimate the association between time to diagnosis for pancreatic cancer and the polymorphic genotypes, adjusting for gender and race. We tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by using an exact test based on genotypic frequencies. The χ2 test was used to determine the difference in the distribution of genotypes between patients with metastatic and nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer. We tested the null hypothesis for multiplicative gene-gene interaction by including main-effect variables and their product terms in the Cox regression model. A more-than-multiplicative interaction is suggested by the Hazard ratio (HR) when HR11>HR10×HR01, in which HR11 is the HR when both factors were present. HR10 is the HR when only factor 1 was present. HR01 is the HR when only factor 2 was present. We also tested for a more-than-additive gene-gene interaction by a bootstrapping test. A more-than-additive interaction is indicated if HR11 > HR10 + HR01 − 1. All statistical analyses were performed using the Stata 8.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

Results

Subject characteristics

The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis of the 205 patients in our study was 60.4 years (range, 25.4–80.3 years); 15.1% were ≤50, 33.2% were 51–60, 29.3% were 61–70, and 22.4% were >70 years. Caucasians, Hispanics, African Americans, and Asians were 85.4%, 6.8%, 5.4%, and 2.4% of the study population, respectively. 125 (61.0%) were men and 80 (39.0%) were women. At the time of diagnosis, metastases were detected (M1) in 53 (25.9%) patients, while detectable metastases were absent (M0) in 152 (74.1%) patients. Race, sex, cigarette smoking, and history of diabetes did not show any significant effect on age at diagnosis. We genotyped the p21 and p27 polymorphisms in 205 pancreatic cancer patients by pyrosequencing. As shown on Table 2, the percentages in subjects were: 83.9 % (172) CC, 14.6% (30) CA and 1.5% (3) AA for p21, and 60.0% (123) TT, 33.7% (69) TG and 6.3% (13) GG for p27. The genotypic frequencies for p21 and p27 were consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (for p21, χ2 = 1.532, P = 0.216; for p27, χ2 = 0.612, P = 0.434). The allelic frequencies for p21 were C, 91%, A, 9%; for p27 were T, 77%, G, 23%.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

Variable No. patients No. deaths
Age at Diagnosis (years)
 ≤50 31 27
 51–60 68 55
 61–70 60 47
 >70 46 38
Sex
 Male 125 106
 Female 80 61
Race
 Caucasian 175 142
 Hispanics 14 12
 African American 11 9
 Asian 5 4
Smoking
 Never 65 49
 Ever 140 118
Diabetes
 No 154 121
 Yes 51 46
Metastases
 No 152 116
 Yes 53 49

Table 2.

Genotypes of p21 and p27 and their association with risk of pancreatic cancer

Genotypes (N = 205) Median age HR* P value

No. (%) at diagnosis (95% CI)
p21 (C-to-A)
 CC 172 (83.9) 61.6 1.00 (reference) 0.001
 CA+AA 33 (16.1) 58.0 1.89 (1.28–2.78)
p27 (T-to-G)
 TT 123 (60) 60.3 1.00 (reference) 0.536
 TG+GG 82 (40) 60.2 1.09 (0.82–1.44)
Combined
 0 variant genotype 100 (48.8) 61.4 1.00 (reference) 0.004
 1 variant genotypes 95 (46.3) 60.4 1.20 (0.90–1.60)
 2 variant genotypes 10 (4.9) 52.8 2.91 (1.49–5.67)
*

HR, hazard ratios and CI, confidence intervals.

Log-rank test for homogeneity between genotypes.

p21 genotype, age at diagnosis, and cancer risk

Because the number of subjects with the p21 homozygous variant genotype was too low to provide meaningful results, we combined the heterozygous and homozygous variant genotypes for the analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that the median age at diagnosis in patients with the p21variant genotype (CA/AA) was 58, which was 3.6 years earlier than those with the p21wild-type genotype (CC) (Fig. 1, Table 2). The median age at diagnosis for the different genotypes was significantly different (log-rank test, P = 0.001). Using the subjects with the p21 wild-type genotype as a reference in the Cox proportional hazards regression model, we found a HR of 1.89 (95% CI, 1. 28–2.78) (Table 2). This result indicated that the subjects with the variant genotypes had a significantly greater probability of being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer during any interval than those with the wild-type genotype.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by patient age for the CA/AA and CC genotypes of the p21 polymorphism.

p27 genotype, age at diagnosis, and cancer risk

Because of low frequency of homozygous variant carriers, we combined the heterozygous and homozygous variant genotypes for the analysis. The median ages of diagnosis for the different genotypes were determined from Kaplan-Meier plots and are shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in age at diagnosis between the variant genotype (TG/GG) and wild-type genotype (TT) for the p27 polymorphism (Log-rank test, P = 0.536). Compared to patients carrying wild-type genotype, patients with variant genotypes did not show a significant increase in the HR (1.09; 95% CI, 0.82–1.44).

Combined effect and pancreatic cancer risk

Because both p21 and p27 are involved in the same cell cycle regulation pathway, we evaluated the effect of combined genotypes upon time-to-diagnosis of cancer. We found that patients with variant genotypes of both p21 and p27 were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer 8.6 years earlier than those with both wild-type genotypes. The median ages at diagnosis for patients with zero, one or two variant genotypes were 61.4, 60.4, and 52.8 years, respectively. Kaplan-Meier plots (Fig. 2) showed a significant difference in age at diagnosis among the different genotypes (Log-rank test, P = 0.004). We also determined whether the p21 and p27 polymorphisms had a joint effect on the age-associated risk of pancreatic cancer. We found that patients with a variant genotype for only one of the two genes had a slightly higher nonsignificant age-associated risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer than patients with wild-type genotypes for both genes (HR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.90–1.60 Table 2). Interestingly, the HR increased to 2.91 (95% CI, 1.49–5.67) for patients carrying variant genotypes for both genes, and these results were confirmed using bootstrapping which showed a 95% CI of 1.66–5.08. These results indicate a joint effect between the p21 variant genotypes and the p27 variant genotypes on the age-associated risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The test for multiplicative gene-gene interaction was close to significant (P = 0.080). A test of an additive model performed by bootstrapping showed significant departure from an additive model (P = 0.012), further supporting a joint effect when both risk genotypes were present.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by patient age for the combined effect of p21and p27 polymorphisms. The patients have either zero (both genes are wild-type), one (only one of two genes is variant), or two (both genes are variant) variant genotypes.

Because we previously reported that Aurora-A and p16 polymorphisms also contributed to an earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, we evaluated the combined effect of polymorphisms of the four cell cycle genes upon time-to-diagnosis of cancer. We found that patients with 3–4 variant genotypes were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer 12.1 years earlier than those with zero variant genotype. The median ages at diagnosis for patients with zero, 1–2 variant genotypes, and 3–4 variant genotypes were 65.7, 59.8, and 53.6 years, respectively. Kaplan-Meier plots (Fig. 3) showed a significant difference in age at diagnosis among the different genotypes (Log-rank test, P = 0.0004). Compared with the reference group (zero variant genotype), patients with 1–2 variant had a slightly higher age-associated risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07–2.02, while the HR increased to 3.36 (95% CI, 1.76–6.40) for patients carrying 3–4 variant genotypes (table 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Kaplan-Meier curves showing cumulative risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by patient age for the combined effect of variant genotypes. The patients have zero variant genotype, 1–2 variant genotypes, or 3–4 variant genotypes.

Table 3.

Joint effects of variant genotypes and their association with risk of pancreatic cancer

No. of variant genotypes (N = 205) Median age HR* P value

No. (%) at diagnosis (95% CI)
0 variant genotype 57 (27.8) 65.7 1.00 (reference) 0.0004
1–2 variant genotypes 136 (66.3) 59.8 1.47 (1.07–2.02)
3–4 variant genotypes 12 (5.9) 53.6 3.36 (1.76–6.40)
*

HR, hazard ratios and CI, confidence intervals.

Log-rank test for homogeneity between genotypes.

The effect of p21 and p27 polymorphisms on cancer status

We also determined the potential effect of the p21 genotype on tumor invasion and metastasis. No significant differences in the p21 genotypic frequencies between subgroup M1 and subgroup M0 were observed (χ2 = 0.167; P = 0.683). Additionally, the variant genotype was not significantly associated with survival after diagnosis (Log-rank test, P = 0.830). Similarly, no significant differences in the p27 genotypic frequencies between subgroup M1 and subgroup M0 were observed (data not shown). Furthermore, no significant association between the polymorphism and disease status was found when patients in stage I were compared with patients in stage II – IV for p21 and p27 (data not shown).

Discussion

In this study, we found that p21 polymorphism contributes to a significantly earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and that p21 and p27 polymorphisms cooperatively contribute to an earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Patients with one or two variant alleles in both genes had a 2.91-fold increased risk for earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer compared with wild-type genotypes and were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer 8.6 years earlier. These observations indicate that the polymorphisms of these two genes could be risk markers for early detection of pancreatic cancer.

When the functional p21 polymorphism was analyzed alone for influence on age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, patients with the variant genotypes (CA/AA) developed pancreatic cancer earlier than did those with the wild-type genotype (CC) and had an approximately 1.89-fold increased age-associated risk. It is biologically plausible that the p21 polymorphism might influences age onset of cancer, as p21 can arrest the cell cycle in G1 phase, in order to allow repair of damaged DNA and inhibition of carcinogenesis [9]. Current studies suggest that the polymorphism is likely to contribute to genetic susceptibility to cancer [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] and [15], although some studies found no association between the polymorphism and cancer risk, including lung caner [16] and [17] and breast cancer [18]. This discrepancy could be due to the different carcinogenic mechanisms (different cancers), underlying genetic backgrounds or environmental and social factors in the different populations studied. Another possible explanation is that the polymorphism is in linkage disequilibrium with other functional variants at susceptibility loci. However, this hypothesis remains to be tested.

There was no significant difference in age at diagnosis between the variant genotype (TG/GG) and wild-type genotype (TT) for the p27 polymorphism. Patients with variant genotypes did not show a significantly higher age-associated risk than those who carried wild-type genotype. Our result is consistent with other studies that did not observe any association with cancer risk [18], [19] and [20]. However, the p21 and p27 polymorphisms combined had a joint effect on age-associated risk for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Compared to patients with wild-type genotypes for both genes, the median age at diagnosis for patients with one or two variant alleles for both genes was 8.6 years earlier. We found that patients with a variant genotype for only one of the two genes had a slightly higher nonsignificant age-associated risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer than patients with wild-type genotypes for both genes (HR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.90–1.60). Interestingly, the HR increased to 2.91 (95% CI, 1.49–5.67) for patients carrying variant genotypes for both genes. These results indicate a joint effect between the p21variant genotypes and p27 variant genotypes on the age-associated risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. A test of an additive model performed by bootstrapping showed significant departure from an additive model (P = 0.012), further supporting a joint effect when both risk genotypes were present.

p21 and p27, members of the KIP family, inhibit the activities of cyclin D-, E-, and A-dependent kinases and induce cell-cycle arrest to allow cells to stop and repair DNA lesions before DNA replication occurs in S phase. Low levels of p27 are reported to be causally related to tumorigenesis [21]. The p21 C-to-A polymorphism in codon 31 causing a serine-to-arginine substitution in the DNA-binding zinc-finger motif could encode functionally distinct proteins [22] and [23]. The p27 T-to-G polymorphism in codon 109 causing a valine-to-glycine substitution may affect the interaction between p21 and its negative regulator p38 and thereby modify p21 degradation [24]. Since both the p21 and p27 polymorphisms are low penetrance mutations that only slightly alter protein functions, the combined effects of the two polymorphisms could be to intensify cell cycle arrest after DNA damage and lead to incompletely repaired genomes, thereby suppressing the apoptosis response. Future studies need to clarify the functional effects of the p21 and p27 polymorphisms.

In order to evaluate aggregate effect of polymorphisms in cell cycle regulator genes, we performed a combined variant genotype analysis that include Aurora-A and p16 polymorphisms which we previous reported [8]. We found that patients with 3–4 variant genotypes were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer 12.1 years earlier than those with zero variant genotype (Log-rank test, P = 0.0004). Compared with the reference group (zero variant genotype), patients with 1–2 variant had a slightly higher age-associated risk for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07–2.02), while the HR increased to 3.36 (95% CI, 1.76–6.40) for patients carrying 3–4 variant genotypes. Our finding suggests that combining multiple polymorphisms in a single pathway (the cell cycle pathway) may be powerful in identifying patients at increased risk for developing pancreatic cancer at an early age.

Our data did not show significant correlation between the polymorphisms and the cancer’s metastatic status or stage. That may be because the development of pancreatic cancer is a multistep process with many factors contributing to the pathogenesis and progression. Those polymorphisms may not influence later events since other factors may begin to have greater influence as the cancer begins to metastasize.

Because early pancreatic cancer does not have any specific symptoms, tumors often go undetected until they have already spread beyond the pancreas, resulting in the worst prognosis of all solid tumors. New approaches to earlier diagnosis are important for improving the prognosis of the disease. If confirmed, the present findings, combined with the identification of additional environmental and genetic risk factors, could provide a panel of risk markers, which could help identify those patients who are more likely to develop pancreatic cancer and this could lead to earlier detection and treatment, longer survival time, and lower mortality of pancreatic cancer. Future studies will focus on identifying additional risk factors.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants P20 CA101936 and U01 CA111302; National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support grant CA16672 (Frazier, ML); This research was supported in part, by the Janis Davis Gordon Memorial Postdoctoral Fellowship, Division of Cancer Prevention, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Chen, J).

We thank Haidee Chancoco for DNA extraction and Mr. Henry F. Gomez for the data collection.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bardeesy N, DePinho RA. Pancreatic cancer biology and genetics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:897–909. doi: 10.1038/nrc949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coqueret O. New roles for p21 and p27 cell-cycle inhibitors: a function for each cell compartment? Trends Cell Biol. 2003;13:65–70. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(02)00043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gartel AL. The conflicting roles of the cdk inhibitor p21(CIP1/WAF1) in apoptosis. Leuk Res. 2005;29:1237–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schor E, da Silva ID, Sato H, Baracat EC, Girao MJ, de Freitas V. P27(Kip1) is down-regulated in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chedid M, Michieli P, Lengel C, Huppi K, Givol D. A single nucleotide substitution at codon 31 (Ser/Arg) defines a polymorphism in a highly conserved region of the p53-inducible gene WAF1/CIP1. Oncogene. 1994;9:3021–3024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cave H, Martin E, Devaux I, Grandchamp B. Identification of a polymorphism in the coding region of the p27Kip1 gene. Ann Genet. 1995;38:108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen J, Li D, Wei C, Sen S, Killary AM, Amos CI, et al. Aurora-A and p16 polymorphisms contribute to an earlier age at diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in Caucasians. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3100–3104. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Harada K, Ogden GR. An overview of the cell cycle arrest protein, p21(WAF1) Oral Oncol. 2000;36:3–7. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Popanda O, Edler L, Waas P, Schattenberg T, Butkiewicz D, Muley T, et al. Elevated risk of squamous-cell carcinoma of the lung in heavy smokers carrying the variant alleles of the TP53 Arg72Pro and p21 Ser31Arg polymorphisms. Lung Cancer. 2007;55:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li G, Liu Z, Sturgis EM, Shi Q, Chamberlain RM, Spitz MR, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of p21 are associated with risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1596–1602. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kibel AS, Suarez BK, Belani J, Oh J, Webster R, Brophy-Ebbers M, et al. CDKN1A and CDKN1B polymorphisms and risk of advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2033–2036. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Keshava C, Frye BL, Wolff MS, McCanlies EC, Weston A. Waf-1 (p21) and p53 polymorphisms in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:127–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roh JW, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, Park IA, Park SY, et al. p53 and p21 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xi YG, Ding KY, Su XL, Chen DF, You WC, Shen Y, et al. p53 polymorphism and p21WAF1/CIP1 haplotype in the intestinal gastric cancer and the precancerous lesions. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:2201–2206. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Su L, Liu G, Zhou W, Xu LL, Miller DP, Park S, et al. No association between the p21 codon 31 serine-arginine polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:174–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shih CM, Lin PT, Wang HC, Huang WC, Wang YC. Lack of evidence of association of p21WAF1/CIP1 polymorphism with lung cancer susceptibility and prognosis in Taiwan. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2000;91:9–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2000.tb00854.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ma H, Jin G, Hu Z, Zhai X, Chen W, Wang S, et al. Variant genotypes of CDKN1A and CDKN1B are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2173–2178. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li G, Sturgis EM, Wang LE, Chamberlain RM, Spitz MR, El-Naggar AK, et al. Association between the V109G polymorphism of the p27 gene and the risk and progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3996–4002. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chang BL, Zheng SL, Isaacs SD, Wiley KE, Turner A, Li G, et al. A polymorphism in the CDKN1B gene is associated with increased risk of hereditary prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1997–1999. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1501–1512. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.12.1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huppi K, Siwarski D, Dosik J, Michieli P, Chedid M, Reed S, et al. Molecular cloning, sequencing, chromosomal localization and expression of mouse p21 (Waf1) Oncogene. 1994;9:3017–3020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mousses S, Ozcelik H, Lee PD, Malkin D, Bull SB, Andrulis IL. Two variants of the CIP1/WAF1 gene occur together and are associated with human cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:1089–1092. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.6.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tomoda K, Kubota Y, Kato J. Degradation of the cyclin-dependent-kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 is instigated by Jab1. Nature. 1999;398:160–165. doi: 10.1038/18230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES