Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):314–315. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.059

The Purification Method Using Iodixanol (Optiprep)-Based Density Gradient Significantly Reduces Cytokine/Chemokine Production from Human Islet Preparations, Leading to Prolong β-Cell Survival During Culture

Atsuyoshi Mita a,e, Camillo Ricordi a,b,c, Atsushi Miki a, Scott Barker a, Aisha Khan a, Alejandro Alvarez a, Yasuhiko Hashikura f, Shin-ichi Miyagawa e, Hirohito Ichii a,b,c
PMCID: PMC3780973  NIHMSID: NIHMS99794  PMID: 19249543

Abstract

Improved islet isolation has still been important to obtain adequate islet numbers for islet transplantation. Although Ficol-based density gradient is widely used for purification in most islet processing centers, OptiPrep-based density gradient is recently used in the limited centers and their clinical outcomes are excellent. Cytokine/chemokine production from islet preparations for transplantation widely varies. Some cytokines/chemokines have been reported to cause apoptosis in human islet preparations after isolation. Reducing cytokine/chemokine production is a key to improve islet numbers after isolation and islet transplantation outcome. The aim of current study is to investigate the variability of pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine production from islet preparations purified by different density gradient. After digestion of human pancreata, pre-purification digests were devided into two groups and purified using semi-automated cell processor with Ficoll-based and OptiPrep-based density gradient. Islet preparations were cultured for 2 days and assessed regarding islet cell viability (FDA/PI), fractional β-cell viability and β-cell content. Cytokine/chemokine production from islet preparations was also examined. After purification, purity, post-purification IEQ and islet recovery rate were comparable between two groups. Although FDA/PI and fractional β-cell viability showed no significant differences, β-cell survival during culture significantly increased in OptiPrep-based density gradient group when compared to Ficoll-based density gradient group. TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-6 and MIP-1β production from OptiPrep-based density gradient group significantly decreased.

OptiPrep-based density gradient can reduce cytokine-production when compared to Ficoll-based density gradient, resulting in improvement of quantity of β-cell mass. Cytokine profiling could spot new light on assessment of islet preparations before transplantation.


Improved islet isolation techniques have contributed to the progression of islet transplantation as a treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus 1, 2. However, many recipients require two or three times islet transplantation to achieve insulin independence. Improved islet isolation has still been important to obtain adequate islet numbers. Although Ficoll-based density gradient has been widely used for human islet purification in most islet processing centers, OptiPrep-based density gradient was recently used in the limited centers. It has been reported that Islet preparations purified using OptiPrep-based density gradient provided better clinical outcomes 3. It is well known that cytokine/chemokine production from islet preparations widely varies. Reducing cytokine/chemokine production from islet preparations may be a key to improve islet transplantation outcomes. The aim of current study is to investigate the variability of pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine production from human islet preparations purified using different density gradients.

Materials and Methods

Human islet isolations were performed using automated method 4. After digestion phase, pre-purification digests were divided into two groups and purified using semi-automated cell processor with Ficoll-based or OptiPrep-based density gradient. Human Islet preparations were cultured for 2 days, and assessed regarding islet cell viability (FDA/PI), fractional β-cell viability and β-cell content 5. Cytokine/chemokine production from islet preparations was also examined.

Results

Between Ficoll-based and OptiPrep-based density gradient groups, islet purity (80.0 ± 10.8 % and 74.3 ± 14.2 %, respectively, p=0.203), post-purification islet equivalent (IEQ) (128,504 ± 28,893 IEQ and 127,235 ± 16,970 IEQ, respectively, p=0.961) and islet recovery rate (46.4 ± 4.2 % and 57.3 ± 14.4 %, respectively, p=0.460) were comparable. There were no significant differences between these groups by FDA/PI (92.4 ± 2.5 % and 90.6 ± 3.6 %, respectively, p=0.550), and fractional β-cell viability in OptiPrep-based density gradient group was comparable when compared to Ficoll-based density gradient group (57.6 ± 8.3 % and 64.5 ± 5.7 %, respectively, p=0.178). β-cell survival during culture significantly increased 1.31 ± 0.02 times in OptiPrep-based density gradient group when compared to Ficoll-based density gradient group (p<0.001). TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-γ, IL-6 and MIP-1β production from OptiPrep-based density gradient group significantly decreased to 22.8 ± 11.8 %, 27.7 ± 14.0 %, 37.3 ± 11.2 %, 45.3 ± 16.2 %, and 38.5 ± 18.6 % of each from Ficoll-based density gradient group (p<0.05).

Discussion

Current study clearly demonstrates that use of Ficoll, but not OptiPrep, for purification associates the release of pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine and could detrimentally affect islet survival during culture. These findings suggest the reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine production after purification by OptiPrep-based density gradient might indirectly contribute to improved stimulated β-cell survival. We obtained comparable purity, post-purification number of islet and recovery rate using the same density gradient made from either Ficoll or OptiPrep with the same procedure of purification. OptiPrep-based density gradient will be used Clinical Islet Transplant (CIT) trial in U.S.A. Although islets culture offers several advantages such as possible pre-transplant interventions including immunosuppression 1 3, the number of islet equivalent reduces during culture 2. Our results suggest that the purification method using OptiPrep-based density gradient may be of assistance in improving clinical outcomes, and that Cytokine/chemokine profiling from islet preparations could be helpful to develop better isolation methods.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH-NCRR, GCRC MO1RR16587, NIDDK RO1-DK55347-IU42RR016603, 5R01 DK25802, ICR 5U42RR016603, JDRFI 4-200-946 and 4-2004-361, and the Diabetes Research Institute Foundation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Ryan EA, Paty BW, Senior PA, Bigam D, Alfadhli E, Kneteman NM, Lakey JR, Shapiro AM. Five-year follow-up after clinical islet transplantation. Diabetes. 2005;54:2060–2069. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.7.2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Froud T, Ricordi C, Baidal DA, Hafiz MM, Ponte G, Cure P, Pileggi A, Poggioli R, Ichii H, Khan A, Ferreira JV, Pugliese A, Esquenazi VV, Kenyon NS, Alejandro R. Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes mellitus using cultured islets and steroid-free immunosuppression: Miami experience. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2037–2046. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hering BJ, Kandaswamy R, Ansite JD, Eckman PM, Nakano M, Sawada T, Matsumoto I, Ihm SH, Zhang HJ, Parkey J, Hunter DW, Sutherland DE. Single-donor, marginal-dose islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA. 2005;293:830–835. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.7.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ricordi C, Lacy PE, Finke EH, Olack BJ, Scharp DW. Automated method for isolation of human pancreatic islets. Diabetes. 1988;37:413–420. doi: 10.2337/diab.37.4.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ichii H, Inverardi L, Pileggi A, Molano RD, Cabrera O, Caicedo A, Messinger S, Kuroda Y, Berggren PO, Ricordi C. A novel method for the assessment of cellular composition and beta-cell viability in human islet preparations. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:1635–1645. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES