Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2013 Oct;195(2):623.

Corrigendum

PMCID: PMC3781987

In the article by Max Shpak (GENETICS 177: 2181–2194) entitled “Selection Against Demographic Stochasticity in Age-Structured Populations,” Equation 6 should read:

σλ2=i1νi[(λFi)2var[Fi]+(λbi)2bi(1bi)]=i1νi[(λi+1liτ)2var[Fi]+(λiVi+1liτ)2bi(1bi)], (6)

where 1/νi should appear as a factor for both the first and second term in the brackets, reflecting the fact that each term should be weighted by its contribution relative to the equilibrium frequency for age class i. In the equations for Ne following Equation 11 on page 2187, the final term should read:

Ne=N1+i(1/νi)[(λi+1li/τ)2var[Fi]+(λiVi+1li/τ)2bi(1bi)]

The numerical examples in the diffusion analysis in the sections on pages 2187–2190 considered only variance due to survivorship var(bi) = bi(1 − bi), so the demographic variances computed for Figures 2 and 3, etc., remain unchanged.

In Equation 12, the indices 1 and 2 were switched in the denominator terms, so the final term in Equation 12 should read:

U(p)=pσ22pσ22+(1p)σ12 (12)

In the context of the corrections to Equation 6, the sensitivity analysis in Appendix Equations A2, A3, and A5 should appear (assuming Fi independent of bi and vice versa) as follows:

σλ2bi=bii1νi[(λFi)2var[Fi]+(λbi)2bi(1bi)]=bii1νi[(λi+1liτ)2var[Fi]+(λiVi+1liτ)2bi(1bi)] (A2)
σλ2bi=iνi2νibi[(λFi)2var[Fi]+(λbi)2bi(1bi)]+i1νi[2(λFi)(2λbiFi)var[Fi]+(λbi)2(12bi)+2(λbi)(2λbi2)bi(1bi)] (A3)
σλ2Fi=iνi2νiFi[(λFi)2var[Fi]+(λbi)2bi(1bi)]+i1νi[2(λFi)(2λFi2)var[Fi]+(λFi)2var[Fi]Fi+2(λFi)(2λbiFi)bi(1bi)] (A5)

Thanks go to Stefano Giaimo for bringing the errors in Equations 6 and 12 to the author’s attention.


Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES