Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(1):4–9. doi: 10.1080/08858190802683560

Then and Now: Comparison of Baseline Breast Cancer Screening Rates at 2 Time Intervals

Georgia Robins Sadler 1, Jenny Hung 1, Paula R Beerman 1, Mary Chen 1, Janice Chow 1, Nancy Chan 1
PMCID: PMC3782251  NIHMSID: NIHMS508280  PMID: 19259858

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is Asian American women’s most frequently occurring cancer.

Methods

Asian American women completed breast cancer-related baseline surveys for 2 studies 5 years apart.

Results

Statistically significant and rapid improvements in knowledge and screening practices were seen between the 948 participants in the first study (1995) and the 1540 participants in the second study. This increase paralleled the reported climb in early detection rates among Asian American women.

Conclusions

The data document the achievement of a tipping point in breast cancer screening rates with culturally and linguistically focused education programs and increased access to screening among disadvantaged women.


Breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer among women living in the United States. Asian American women have the lowest breast cancer incidence rates, but their likelihood of developing breast cancer increases with the length of time that they have lived in the United States. Hence, that low incidence rate is anticipated to increase as Asian American women’s residency in the United States extends.1,2 Further, as the Asian population’s average age has risen, so has its breast cancer incidence. Between 1988 and 2002, the breast cancer incidence among Asian American women increased from 77.7 per 100,000 to 92.9 per 100,000, whereas a decrease in incidence was noted when all women were grouped together (from 135.5 per 100,000 to 126.7 per 100,000). Asian women have also had lower breast cancer mortality rates than other groups, but during that same time period, their mortality rate increased from 14.0 per 100,000 in 1988 to 14.7 per 100,000 in 2002,3 whereas the mortality rate among women of all races combined decreased from 32.4 per 100,000 women in 1988 to 23.2 per 100,000 in 2002.3

Such data highlighted the need to promote breast cancer education and screening among Asian American women if a rise in mortality rates were to be prevented. Of equal concern was the data that showed Asian American women had the lowest rate of breast cancer early detection.4,5

Given the life-saving value of early breast cancer detection and the economic barriers to screening, the California legislature created the 1993 Breast Cancer Act. Effective July 1994, this funded mandate provided low income women throughout California with free access to breast cancer screening. It also funded a series of breast cancer education programs throughout the State.

In this article, we examine changes in the knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes of 2 convenience samples of Asian women who participated in separate evaluations of the Asian Grocery Store-Based program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data collection was accomplished through the Asian Grocery Store-Based Cancer Education Program, a campus-community partnership with the Moores University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Cancer Center as the campus partner and over 2 dozen Asian grocery stores throughout San Diego County as the community partners. UCSD recruited bilingual, bicultural Asian American university students to work as the program’s breast cancer community health educators in salaried and service learning positions. They personalized breast cancer public health messages to large numbers of Asian American women for whom language, culture, and transportation barriers might limit access to information and screening.614

Asian grocery stores were asked to partner with the university because they were perceived to be venues where Asian women repeatedly spent a considerable amount of discretionary time. In addition, Asian women of diverse acculturation levels, linguistic preferences and proficiencies, and socioeconomic status could be easily reached at the Asian grocery stores.614

The Asian grocery-store-based education programs were designed as brief interventions to heighten breast cancer awareness, to stimulate and motivate the women to gather additional information, and to get screened if they were not already adhering to the mammography and clinical breast exam guidelines. Over the duration of the studies, breast self-exam screening was gradually losing favor, but adherence continued to be evaluated because the final conclusions regarding breast self exam had not been established.15

Posters in various Asian languages and country-specific visual icons helped to attract shoppers; small tokens of appreciation (eg, small candles, small vases, sunscreen samples) were given to women who agreed to participate in the study. Once trained, health educators rotated their education sessions among the Asian grocery stores and varied the times and days of the outreach events to increase sample diversity.

From 1995 to 1998, women (N = 1202) were recruited to a demonstration project (Study 1) to evaluate the feasibility, viability, and acceptability of Asian grocery stores as sites for delivering breast cancer information.614 Women verbally consented and completed a baseline survey in their preferred language (Institutional Review Board [IRB] approved). Based on the success of the demonstration project, an IRB-approved, randomized controlled trial (Study 2) was conducted at the Asian grocery stores from 2000–2004 (N = 1687). In this article, we compare the baseline data between Study 1 and 2.

Description of the Sample

Participants self-identified as being female, of Asian descent, and at least 20 years of age. Whereas Study 1 focused on the 6 largest Asian ethnic groups (Chinese, Filipino, Southeast Indian, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese), Study 2 was focused on the 4 Asian communities that Study 1 had shown to have the lowest adherence rates to recommended screening guidelines (Chinese, Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese). Only the Study 1 participants (n = 948) from those 4 groups were included in this study with the 1540 participants from Study 2.

Of the women who reported their age (85% in Study 1; 94% in Study 2), the ages ranged from 20 to 86 years for Study 1 and from 20 to 101 for Study 2, with 46% of those in Study 1 and 73% of those in Study 2 being aged 40 and older (Table 1). This age shift from Study 1 to Study 2 (χ21 = 124.9, P = 0.05) reflected the methodologic shift to overrecruiting women aged 40 and older in Study 2 because of breast cancer’s increasing risk with age.

TABLE 1.

Sociodemographic Characteristics by Study Group of Women

Study 1* Study 2


Characteristic n (SD) n (SD) P Value
Age, y
  Mean (SD) 42.4 (11.7) 48.5 (12.0) <.001
  Mode 45 48
  Median 41.0 48.0
  Range 20–86 20–101

n (%) n (%) χ2

Age groups
  20–39 y 369 (39) 338 (22) 1.40
  40–49 y 242 (26) 466 (30) 70.87
  50+ y 191 (20) 652 (42) 252.10
  Unspecified 146 (15) 84 (6) 16.71
  Full Sample 948 (100) 1540 (100) 212.20
Ethnic group§
  Chinese 302 (32) 390 (25) 11.19
  Filipino 248 (26) 418 (27) 43.39
  Korean 123 (13) 376 (25) 128.28
  Vietnamese 275 (29) 356 (23) 10.40
  Full Sample 948 (100) 1540 (100) 55.53
English as the native language
  Chinese 16 (2) 52 (13) 12.55
  Filipino 17 (2) 102 (25) 33.11
  Korean 3 (1) 49 (13) 11.23
  Vietnamese 3 (1) 8 (2) 1.23
Total 39 (4) 211 (14) 171.45
*

N = 948.

N = 1540.

For Study 1, the goal was to recruit the same portion of participants in each ethnic group.

§

For Study 2, the goal was to recruit equal sized ethnic groups with follow-up data rather than meeting the same proportions of participants as had been recruited in the earlier study.

Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS version 14.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Mammography and clinical breast examination (CBE) data analysis excluded participants younger than 40 years of age. Statistical significance was determined by chi-square analysis, with a P ≤ .05 considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Evaluating Change

Changes in Baseline Breast Cancer Screening Rates from Study 1 to 2

Women showed statistically significant increases in adherence to recommended breast self-exam, CBE, and mammography screening guidelines from Study 1 to 2 (Tables 2 and 3). The increased screening rates were also noted for each of the 4 individual ethnic groups. A parallel statistically significant decrease was noted in the number of women who reported never having had a mammogram from Study 1 to 2 (Table 4).

TABLE 2.

Baseline Breast Self-Exam Screening Adherence Rates Increased Significantly from Study 1 to Study 2 Among all Ethnic Groups and Ages (P < .05)*

Age 20–
39 y
Age 40–
49 y
Age 40 y
and Over
Age 50
and
Over




Ethnic Group n % n % n % n %
Chinese (Study 1) 141 27 65 25 120 28 55 33
Chinese (Study 2) 96 62 120 59 275 64 155 67
χ2 28.13 20.21 41.79 19.70
Filipino (Study 1) 72 46 75 48 137 49 62 50
Filipino (Study 2) 53 74 120 83 342 84 222 84
χ2 9.63 27.31 62.18 31.84
Korean (Study 1) 59 32 27 22 51 26 24 29
Korean (Study 2) 117 52 140 63 234 62 94 61
χ2 6.29 15.19 22.55 7.63
Vietnamese (Study 1) 84 20 66 33 109 32 43 30
Vietnamese (Study 2) 71 48 85 53 261 60 176 64
χ2 13.32 5.79 24.22 15.74
Full Sample (Study 1) 356 30 233 34 417 36 184 38
Full Sample (Study 2) 337 57 465 65 1112 69 647 71
χ2 52.23 60.44 137.07 69.90
*

The numbers represent only women who provided valid data for these questions.

TABLE 3.

Baseline Adherence to Clinical Breast Exam and Mammography Screening Guidelines Increased Significantly Among and all Ethnic Groups and Ages (P < .05)*

Annual
Clinical
Breast
Exam Age
40 y and
Over
Annual
Mammogra
phy Age 40
y and Over
Annual
Mammogr
aphy Age
50 y and
Over



Ethnic Group n % n % n %
Chinese (Study 1) 120 53% 120 34% 55 35%
Chinese (Study 2) 275 90% 275 83% 155 83%
χ2 68.89 89.64 46.24
Filipino (Study 1) 137 48% 137 53% 62 58%
Filipino (Study 2) 344 90% 345 86% 224 88%
χ2 103.12 60.01 28.72
Korean (Study 1) 51 49% 51 22% 24 29%
Korean (Study 2) 232 86% 234 77% 94 90%
χ2 35.48 58.05 41.76
Vietnamese (Study 1) 109 54% 109 39% 43 33%
Vietnamese (Study 2) 262 89% 261 84% 177 89%
χ2 55.63 75.21 62.99
Full Sample (Study 1) 417 52% 417 39% 184 47%
Full Sample (Study 2) 1113 89% 1115 83% 650 77%
χ2 260.69 269.98 173.10
*

The numbers represent only women who provided valid data for these questions.

TABLE 4.

Women who Reported Never Having had a Mammogram at Baseline Decreased Among all Ethnic Groups and Ages (P < .05)*

Women
Age 40–49
y
Women age
40 y and
Over
Women
Age 50 y
and Over



Ethnic Group n % n % n %
Chinese (Study 1) 65 66% 120 66% 55 66%
Chinese (Study 2) 120 18% 275 18% 155 17%
χ2 42.31 89.64 46.24
Filipino (Study 1) 75 52% 137 47% 62 42%
Filipino (Study 2) 121 18% 345 14% 224 12%
χ2 24.70 60.01 28.72
Korean (Study 1) 27 85% 51 78% 24 71%
Korean (Study 2) 140 32% 234 23% 94 10%
χ2 26.38 58.05 41.76
Vietnamese (Study 1) 66 56% 109 61% 43 67%
Vietnamese (Study 2) 84 25% 261 16% 177 11%
χ2 15.04 75.21 62.99
Full sample (Study 1) 233 61% 417 60% 184 59%
Full sample (Study 2) 465 24% 1115 17% 650 13%
χ2 93.56 269.98 173.10
*

The numbers represent only women who provided valid data for these questions.

Anticipating Future Programmatic Content and Structure

Women’s Perceptions of the Adequacy of Their Breast Cancer Knowledge

To help the research team plan future interventions, women were asked about their perceptions of the adequacy of their current breast cancer knowledge (Table 5). Less than half of the women in Studies 1 and 2 reported feeling that they possessed sufficient knowledge, and there was no significant difference from Study 1 to 2. When participants were compared by ethnic subgroup, Korean women reported a statistically significant increase in the perceived adequacy of their breast cancer knowledge by Study 2, whereas Chinese women reported a statistically significant decrease in the adequacy of their breast cancer knowledge at Study 2.

TABLE 5.

Differences in Knowledge Preferences by Cultural Subgroups*

Sufficient
Knowledge About
Breast Cancer
Prefer to get New
Health Knowledge
by Mail
Prefer to get New
Health Knowledge
by Telephone
Prefers to get New
Health Knowledge
Both Ways




Ethnic Group n % n % n % n %
Chinese Study 1) 184 57% 302 74% 302 19% 302 13%
Chinese (Study 2) 355 47% 379 79% 379 44% 379 22%
χ2 4.36 2.10 46.52 9.46
Filipino (Study 1) 182 47% 248 68% 248 30% 248 23%
Filipino (Study 2) 372 51% 409 78% 409 61% 409 39%
χ2 0.53 8.91 57.98 17.24
Korean (Study 1) 81 25% 123 76% 123 34% 123 28%
Korean (Study 2) 303 48% 366 76% 366 48% 366 24%
χ2 14.37 0.03 7.52 0.64
Vietnamese (Study 1) 200 49% 275 52% 275 39% 275 29%
Vietnamese (Study 2) 303 51% 345 72% 345 77% 345 48%
χ2 0.22 26.86 91.71 23.82
Full Sample (Study 1) 647 48% 948 66% 948 30% 948 22%
Full Sample (Study 2) 1333 49% 1499 76% 1499 57% 1499 33%
χ2 0.45 29.50 176.62 34.02
*

The numbers represent only women who provided valid data for these questions.

Chi-square indicates significant differences between the Study Groups, P < .05.

Women’s Reported Preferences for Receiving Future Health Information

To facilitate addressing identified needs for additional information, women were asked to indicate their preferences for how they would like to receive future health information and could select either by mail, by telephone, or both. Receiving information by mail was the participants’ clear preference, with two thirds of the women indicating that they preferred to receive their future health information by mail in Study 1 and three fourths by Study 2 (P < .05). This shift reflected changes seen mostly among Filipino and Vietnamese women.

The frequency with which women opted to receive their health information by phone also increased significantly, a finding that was consistent among all 4 ethnic subgroups (Table 5). In Study 1, less than one third of the women preferred to receive health information by phone; by Study 2, over 50% of women preferred to receive their health information by phone. Between those 2 groups was a smaller group of women who selected both mail and phone, 22% for Study 1 and 33% for Study 2, respectively (P < .05). This shift was significant for every ethnic group except Korean women.

DISCUSSION

Consistent with the findings from Study 1, previous studies had also shown that Asian American women engaged in breast cancer screening at suboptimal rates.1618 In Study 1, screening rates were far below the 70% goal then set in the National Cancer Institute’s and the American Cancer Society’s Year 2000 Goals, suggesting a cohort at significant risk of late stage breast cancer detection.4,1922

These data raised grave concerns for Asian American women’s breast cancer related risks because adherence to screening guidelines has been consistently correlated with early stage detection, which has, in turn, been correlated with increased survival rates.2325 In California, such findings prompted interventions directed at Asian American women through California’s Breast Cancer Early Detection Program, Komen for the Cure, the American Cancer Society, and the National Cancer Institute.

The cumulative outcome of this plethora of media campaigns and public health programs directed toward Asian American women may have increased their awareness of the need for screening and contributed to the dramatic shift in screening rates seen by Study 2.26, 27 This occurred across the sample as a whole as well as across all 4 ethnic subgroups studied.

These shifts are consistent with shifting increases in earlier stages of breast cancer detection more recently reported by the California Cancer Registry.28 According to the data in the California Cancer Registry, the early stage detection among Asian American women has steadily improved to the point that Asian American women surpassed Hispanic American women’s early detection rates in 1994, equaled African American women’s rates in 2001, and surpassed white women in 2003.29

This study suggests that many Asian American women realize they need more breast cancer information and offers several information delivery strategies. The women’s preferences to receive information by mail or phone or both suggest educational strategies that might be employed. The Asian grocery stores clearly offer an additional, well-tested strategy.

A key strength of this campus community partnership with Asian grocery stores was the diversity of the women reached and the greater likelihood that they may be underserved, from a medical and public health perspective. Most reported preferences for using a language other than English: Study 1 (96%) and Study 2 (86%). This characteristic increases their risk of barriers to accessing information and services.

A limitation of this study was that the 2 studies data were drawn using convenience samples and may not be representative of all Asian American women. Further, at the time of this survey, standardized instruments that might have been appropriate for this study’s focus were either not available or had not been validated for Asian American women. It was also not possible to verify the participants’ self-reported screening adherence data due to the monetary limitations of this study.

In spite of these limitations, the statistically significant increase in reported adherence to screening guidelines from Study 1 to Study 2 suggests that women at least knew the “socially desirable responses” they should be giving by Study 2, and this shift was parallel to the shift toward increased rates of early breast cancer detection being reported in the California Cancer Tumor Registry. Thus, for 4 Asian groups included in this study, the data offer additional insight into the breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of this cohort of Asian American women.

CONCLUSION

The findings reported from this data analysis, in combination with the decreasing numbers of Asian women being reported by the California Cancer Registry to have been detected with late stage breast cancer, suggest that the efforts of public and private organizations and individuals are making a significant, positive impact on improving the breast health of Asian American women. Vigilance is still warranted, however, since as Asian women’s tenure in the United States extends, so too will their risk of developing breast cancer, making it essential that health care providers across the state continue their efforts to reach Asian American women with information and screening appointments plus prompt follow-up appointments when abnormal breast changes are detected.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This project was funded by a series of grants. The primary funding for this project was from the San Diego Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen for the Cure and the California Breast Cancer Early Detection Program. Additional funding was provided by the National Cancer Institute’s R25-CA65745, the Cancer Center core grant 5 P30 CA023100, and the Minority Institution/Cancer Center Partnership Program grants U56 CA92079 and U56 CA92081 as well as the National Institutes of Health’s Division of National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities EXPORT grant P60MD00220. This article’s contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official beliefs of the funding agencies. The authors also wish to thank the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and the San Diego Union of Pacific Asian Communities for their guidance and generous contribution of printed educational materials. Dozens of Asian American students volunteered to assist with both of the studies presented in this article. Their dedication to serving their community is to be commended.

Footnotes

The preliminary data on which this article is based were presented in the poster session at the 2007 annual scientific meeting of the American Association for Cancer Education in Birmingham, Alabama.

References

  • 1.Pineda MD, White E, Kristal AR, Taylor V. Asian breast cancer survival in the US: a comparison between Asian immigrants, US-born Asian Americans and Caucasians. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:976–982. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.5.976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deapen D, Liu L, Perkins C, Bernstein L, Ross RK. Rapidly rising breast cancer incidence rates among Asian-American women. Int J Cancer. 2002;99:747–750. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.California Cancer Registry. [Accessed April 2, 2007];Cancer in California, 2005. 2006 Available at: http://www.ccrcal.org/PDF/Min2005.pdf.
  • 4.Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US. Breast cancer screening and related attitudes among Filipino-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:719–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tu SP, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Boyko EJ. Breast cancer screening by Asian-American women in a managed care environment. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:55–61. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sadler GR, Dong HS, Ko CM, Luu TT, Nguyen HP. Vietnamese American women: breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening adherence. Am J Health Promot. 2001;15:211–214. ii. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.4.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sadler GR, Nguyen F, Doan Q, Au H, Thomas AG. Strategies for reaching Asian Americans with health information. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:224–228. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00067-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sadler GR, Ryujin L, Nguyen T, Oh G, Paik G, Kustin B. Heterogeneity within the Asian American community. Int J Equity Health. 2003;2:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sadler GR, Ryujin LT, Ko CM, Nguyen E. Korean women: breast cancer knowledge, attitudes and behaviors. BMC Public Health. 2001;1:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-1-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sadler GR, Thomas AG, Yen JY, et al. Breast cancer education program based in Asian grocery stores. J Cancer Educ. 2000;15:173–177. doi: 10.1080/08858190009528688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sadler GR, Wang K, Wang M, Ko CM. Chinese women: behaviors and attitudes toward breast cancer education and screening. Womens Health Issues. 2000;10:20–26. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(99)00046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ko CM, Sadler GR, Ryujin L, Dong A. Filipina American women’s breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. BMC Public Health. 2003;3:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-3-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sadler GR, Dhanjal SK, Shah NB, et al. Asian Indian women: knowledge, attitudes and behaviors toward breast cancer early detection. Public Health Nurs. 2001;18:357–363. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2001.00357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sadler GR, Takahashi M, Ko C, Nguyen T. Japanese American women: behaviors and attitudes toward breast cancer education and screening. Health Care Women Int. 2003;24:18–26. doi: 10.1080/07399330390170006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:141–169. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haas JS, Phillips KA, Sonneborn D, McCulloch CE, Liang SY. Effect of managed care insurance on the use of preventive care for specific ethnic groups in the United States. Med Care. 2002;40:743–751. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kagawa-Singer M. Addressing issues for early detection and screening in ethnic populations—an update. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000;27(suppl 9):62–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kagawa-Singer M, Pourat N. Asian American and Pacific Islander breast and cervical carcinoma screening rates and healthy people 2000 objectives. Cancer. 2000;89:696–705. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<696::aid-cncr27>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bhakta P. Asian women’s attitudes to breast self-examination. Nurs Times. 1995;91:44–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ. Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;40:37–51. doi: 10.1007/BF01806001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jang M, Lee E, Woo K. Income, language, and citizenship status: factors affecting the health care access and utilization of Chinese Americans. Health Soc Work. 1998;23:136–145. doi: 10.1093/hsw/23.2.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kagawa-Singer M. Socioeconomic and cultural influences on cancer care of women. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1995;11:109–119. doi: 10.1016/s0749-2081(05)80018-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Healthy People 2010. [Accessed March 12, 2007];Breast Cancer Mortality. 2007 Available at: WWW.healthypeople.gov/document/html/volume1/03cancer.htm.
  • 24.Kerlikowske K, Creasman J, Leung JW, Smith-Bindman R, Ernster VL. Differences in screening mammography outcomes among White, Chinese, and Filipino women. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1862–1868. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.16.1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.National Cancer Institute. [Accessed March 12, 2007];Cancer Trends Progress Report, 2005 Update. 2005 Available at: http://progressreport.cancer.gov.
  • 26.Susan G. Komen for the Cure. [Accessed April 16, 2007];Asians or Pacific Islanders: Developing effective cancer education print materials. 2007 Available at: http://cms.komen.org/komen/AboutBreastCancer/Resources/EducationalMaterialsPrograms/SpecificPopulationWorkboosk/index.htm?ssSourceNodeId=99&ssSourceSiteId=Komen.
  • 27.American Cancer Society. [Accessed April 9, 2007];Asian Pacific Islander Cancer Education Materials Tool. 2007 Available at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ASN/ASN_0.asp.
  • 28.California Cancer Registry. [Accessed April 9, 2007];California Cancer Facts and Figures—2007. 2007 Available at: http://www.ccrcal.org/
  • 29.Summers C, Saltzstein SL, Blair SL, Tsukamote TT, Sadler GR. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Early Detection of Breast Cancer: A Study of 370, 796 Cases From the California Cancer Registry. Unpublished data. 2008 doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES