Dear Editors,
We read with great interest the article by Safarinejad [1], which investigated an association between sulfur mustard (SM) exposure and sperm DNA damage using sperm chromatin structure assay on SM-injured and non-SM-injured infertile and fertile men. Accordingly, spermatozoa from SM-injured subjects had more abnormal chromatin than their non-SM-injured counterparts [1]. This article is quite interesting as the relationship between SM exposure and sperm DNA integrity has not been hitherto reported in the literature [1, 2, 3]. However, there are 2 controversial findings in the study by Safarinejad. In table 1 of the results section, Safarinejad recorded 122.7 nmol/l as the mean value of serum testosterone level in non-SM-injured healthy fertile men (group 4 of the study). In contrast, the mean serum level of testosterone in other studied groups including SM-injured infertile and fertile men and non-SM-injured infertile individuals was about 12.6 nmol/l. Nonetheless, under serum hormones subheading, insignificant difference was concluded among the study groups with regard to this serum hormone [1]. The mean serum level of testosterone in group 4 of the study seems irrelevant to the reference values (i.e. 9.36–37.10 nmol/l) as well [4].
The second ambiguous finding of the study is under semen values subheading in the results section. Safarinejad indicated that the mean ejaculate volumes in non-SM-injured controls and SM-exposed patients were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, statistical analysis of this comparison yielded P value of 0.01 which is less than 0.05 (indicative of the statistical significance) [1]. Since no similar studies are currently available in the SM-related literature, we therefore suggest the author elucidate these discrepancies in the results section to provide more accurate conclusions for the clinicians and researchers in this regard.
References
- 1.Safarinejad MR. Sperm chromatin structure assay analysis of Iranian mustard gas casualties: a long-term outlook. Curr Urol. 2010;4:71–4. doi: 10.1159/000343522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ghabili K, Agutter PS, Ghanei M, Ansarin K, Shoja MM. Mustard gas toxicity: the acute and chronic pathological effects. J Appl Toxicol. 2010;30:627–643. doi: 10.1002/jat.1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ghabili K, Agutter PS, Ghanei M, Ansarin K, Panahi Y, Shoja MM. Sulfur mustard toxicity: history, chemistry, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011;41:384–41. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2010.541224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kratz A, Ferraro M, Sluss PM, Lewandrowski KB. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Laboratory reference values. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1548–1563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcpc049016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]