Abstract
IL-6 plays diverse roles in normal and disease-associated immunity such as that associated with Graves’ disease (GD). In that syndrome, the orbit undergoes remodeling during a process known as thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO). Recently, CD34+ fibrocytes were found to infiltrate the orbit in TAO where they transition into CD34+ orbital fibroblasts. Surprisingly, fibrocytes display high levels of functional thyrotropin receptor (TSHR), the central antigen in GD. We report here that TSH and the pathogenic anti-TSHR antibodies that drive hyperthyroidism in GD induce IL-6 expression in fibrocytes and orbital fibroblasts. Unlike TSHR signaling in thyroid epithelium, that occurring in fibrocytes is completely independent of adenylate cyclase activation and cAMP generation. Instead TSH activates PDK1 and both AKT/PKB and PKC pathways. Expression and use of PKCβII switches to that of PKCµ as fibrocytes transition to TAO orbital fibroblasts. This shift is imposed by CD34− orbital fibroblasts but reverts when CD34+ fibroblasts are isolated. The up-regulation of IL-6 by TSH results from coordinately enhanced IL-6 gene promoter activity and increased IL-6 mRNA stability. TSH-dependent IL-6 expression requires activity at both CREB (−213 to −208 nt) and NF-κB (–78 to −62 nt) binding sites. These results provide novel insights into the molecular action of TSH and signaling downstream for TSHR in non-thyroid cells. Fibrocytes neither express adenylate cyclase nor generate cAMP and thus these findings are free from any influence of cAMP-related signaling. They identify potential therapeutic targets for TAO.
Introduction
G protein coupled proteins, such as the thyrotropin receptor (aka thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, TSHR2), regulate many physiological and pathological processes [1]. Since its molecular cloning by Parmentier and colleagues [2], TSHR and its biological functions have been studied intensively. Almost everything known about its signaling derives from studies conducted on thyroid tissues and derivative epithelial cells [3]. It has recently been recognized that TSHR is expressed widely outside the thyroid gland [4]–[9]. Its role in regulating biological functions in other tissues now needs to be studied in detail. Endo et al [4] detected receptor mRNA in rat epididymal fat at levels approaching those in thyroid. TSH was found to elicit cAMP generation in TSHR-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells and to regulate lipolysis in fat [4], [10]. But relatively few studies have offered details of how TSHR might function in extra-thyroidal cells.
TSHR plays a central pathogenic role in Graves’ disease (GD), an autoimmune syndrome where the thyroid gland becomes over-active and orbital connective tissue undergoes remodeling [11]. In GD, a loss of immune tolerance to that receptor and generation of activating antibodies, termed thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins (TSI), result in hyperthyroidism [12]–[14]. It remains uncertain whether TSHR or TSI directly participates in the pathogenesis of orbital GD, a disfiguring process known as thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) [15]–[18]. TAO is thought to result from local actions of cytokines such as IL-6 [19] which has been widely implicated in inflammation [20], [21]. IL-6 was initially described as a B cell differentiation factor that supports immunoglobulin synthesis [22]. A number of factors regulate its production, acting through both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms [20], [23]. IL-6 transcript instability is attributable, at least in part, to stem loop destabilizing (non-AU) elements [24]. TSH has been shown to upregulate IL-6 production in thyroid epithelium [25] and in non-thyroid cells, such as 3T3-L1 preadipocytes [26], [27] but the mechanisms involved and post-receptor signaling in extra-thyroidal cells remain incompletely determined.
Fibrocytes are CD45+CD34+CXCR4+ collagen I (Col) I+ pluripotent bone marrow-derived progenitor cells involved in normal wound healing, tissue remodeling, and fibrosis [28]–[30]. They present antigens, provide important co-stimulation to T cells, and produce several extracellular matrix molecules, cytokines, and other pro-inflammatory molecules [28]–[31]. They exhibit a CD45+CD34+CD31−CXCR4+Col1+ phenotype that allows them to be distinguished from fibroblasts and other closely related cells of the monocyte lineage [32]. Moreover, they undergo terminal differentiation into adipocytes and myofibroblasts [33]. CD34+ fibrocytes become far more numerous in patients with GD and infiltrate orbital and thyroid tissues in GD [34], [35]. Surprisingly, fibrocytes co-express functional “thyroid-specific” proteins, including functional thyroglobulin and TSHR [36], [37]. The levels of TSHR protein and mRNA are dramatically higher in fibrocytes than in orbital fibroblasts, including those from patients with TAO [34]–[37]. These high levels of TSHR protein as well as differences between its abundance in fibrocytes and fibroblasts have been reported earlier [36]. Moreover, when treated with TSH, fibrocytes produce inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α [34], [35]. It is thus possible that TSH-activated fibrocytes might contribute to local cytokine production.
Here, we characterize the molecular mechanisms involved in the induction of IL-6 by TSH in CD34+ fibrocytes and their derivative CD34+ orbital fibroblasts. That regulation occurs at physiologically relevant concentrations, and is mediated through both enhanced IL-6 gene promoter activity and increased IL-6 transcript stability. Unlike the actions of TSH in thyroid epithelial cells, those in fibrocytes are completely independent of cAMP generation. They are dependent on the coordinate activation of Akt and cell type-specific PKC signaling pathways which in turn are dependent upon an activation of 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1). Interruption of these pathways abolishes the induction of IL-6. Thus, signaling utilized by TSHR in fibrocytes appears complex and differs substantially from that found in the thyroid.
Experimental Procedures
Ethics
The activities reported have been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan Health Care System. The research was conducted entirely in the United States. Participants provided written consent for their participation in the study. The IRB continually monitored the conduct of this study.
Materials
Ficoll-Hypaque (cat #10831), GF109203X (cat #G2911), cycloheximide (cat #01810), 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole (DRB) (cat #D1916), pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC, cat #P8765), and 8-bromo adenosine-3′-5′-cyclic monophosphate (8 Br-cAMP) (cat #B-5386) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), and bovine TSH (bTSH) (cat #609385) was from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Synthetic oligonucleotides were generated by Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY). An inhibitor of AKT, AKTi (cat #124011), was from Calbiochem/EMD Biosciences (Gibbstown, NJ). Anti-phospho PKCµ (Ser 916, cat #916), PDK1 (cat #3062), pPDK1 (Ser 241, cat #3061), pAKT (Ser 473, cat #5171), and p-IKK (Ser176)/IKK (Ser177, cat #2078) Abs came from Cell Signaling (Boston, MA). M22 activating anti-TSHR mAb was from Kronus (Star, ID, cat #M22-5c/00-690). OSU-03012 (cat #s1106) was obtained from Selleckchem (Houston, TX). siRNA targeting AKT was from Abcam (Cambridge, MA) while those targeting CREB (cat #L-003619), PDK1 (cat #L-003017), PKCβII (cat #L-003758), PKCµ (cat #L-005028), and RelA (cat #L-003533) were from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO). IL-6 ELISA kits were from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, cat #D6050). TaqMan gene expression assay PRKD1 (GenBank X75756.1), and adenylate cyclase (cat #Hs00392747) were obtained from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Forskolin was from Active Motif (Carlsbad, CA, cat #40300).
Fibroblast and fibrocyte culture
Orbital fibroblasts were cultured as described previously [38] from orbital fat/connective tissue waste generated during orbital decompression for severe TAO or from normal orbital tissues. These activities have been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan Health Care System. Dermal fibroblasts from a cohort of TSH-resistant subjects and their unaffected relatives [39] were generously provided by Dr. Samuel Refetoff (University of Chicago). Cultures were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 environment on poly-L-lysine-coated culture flasks and dishes. They were covered with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, sodium pyruvate (110 mg/ml), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 units/ml), 4.5% glucose and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). They were utilized between the second and 11th passage. Their phenotype remains unchanged during this interval [38].
Fibrocytes were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as described by Bucala et al. [28]. Briefly, blood was centrifuged over Histopaque-1077, following the manufacturer’s protocol. 24-well plates were inoculated with 5 × 106 cells/well and covered with DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS. After 12–14 d in culture, adherent cells (<5% of starting PBMC population) were washed and removed from the substratum by scraping. Culture purity was >90% fibrocytes by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Cell viability was >90% by trypan blue exclusion.
cAMP assay
cAMP levels in cell lysates were determined with an immunoassay kit (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Cell Sorting
Pure CD34+ and CD34− TAO orbital fibroblast subsets were generated from parental (mixed CD34+ and CD34−) strains. They were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-human CD34 for 30 min at 4°C and sorted under sterile conditions using a BD FACS Aria III instrument (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
RNA isolation and real-time
PCR-RNA was isolated using RNeasy (Qiagen, cat #74106). cDNAs were generated by reverse transcription using oligo (dT) and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). RT-PCR was performed with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The following primers were used: RT2 qPCR primers for IL-6 (Ref Seq Accession # NM_000600.3), (SA Biosciences Qiagen, Cat #PPH0560B), PKCβII forward 5′-TATCTGGGATGGGGTGACAACC-3′ and reverse 5′-CGGTCGAAGTTTTCAGCGTTTC-3′; PKCβI forward 5′-TGTGATGGAGTATGTGAACGGGGG -3′ and reverse 5′-TCGAAGTTGGAGGTGTCTCGCTTG-3′ [40], Gqα forward 5′-ACAAGTACGAGCAGAACAAGGCCA-3′ and reverse 5′-AGGGCGACGAGAAACATGATGGAT-3′ [41], and Gsα forward 5′-GGCTGCCTCGGGAACAGTAAG -3′ and reverse 5′-TAATCATGCCCTATGGTGGGTG-3′ [42]. PKCµ mRNA was quantified using PRKD1 Hs00177037_m1 (Applied Biosystems Cat # L-005028). PDPK1 mRNA levels were assessed using forward 5′- CTGAGCCAGTTTGGCTGC-3′ and reverse 5′-ACGTCCTGTTAGGCGTGTGG-3′. RT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) serving as the internal control on a CFX96 Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad). Amplification conditions consisted of initial 12 min activation at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. Relative quantification of amplicons was performed using the comparative critical threshold (CT) method.
RNA stability assay
mRNA stability was determined in confluent cultures by pre-treating with bTSH (5 mIU/ml) in DMEM with 1% FBS for 12 h. Some plates were shifted to medium without TSH while others were continued in its presence. All cultures received DRB (50 µM) at time “0” and were harvested at the intervals indicated. RT-PCR was performed and data were graphed as a best fit curve.
Transient transfections and reporter assays
A 1171 bp fragment, spanning –1168 to +3 nt of the human IL-6 gene promoter [43] (GenBank no. NG_011640) was cloned into pGL2-basic (Promega, Madison, WI, cat #E1641). Fibroblasts were transiently transfected with 2 µg DNA using Effectene reagent (Qiagen, cat #301425). Transfection efficiency was determined by co-transfecting 0.25 µg of pRL-TK (Promega, Madison, WI, cat #E2241). Fibrocytes were transfected using Nucleofection Technology (Cologne, Germany, cat #VPA-1003, program U023) after they were detached with Accutase (Millipore, Temecula, CA, cat #SCR005). Following centrifugation at 200×g for 10 min, cell pellets were re-suspended in 100 µl buffer provided by the manufacturer and mixed with 2 µg of DNA. After 48 h incubations, luciferase activity was assessed in 20 µl cell extract mixed with 100 µl luciferase assay reagent (Promega, cat # E1980). Activity was measured as light output (10 s) in a Veritas Microplate Luminometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA).
Site-directed mutagenesis
IL-6 gene promoter fragments containing mutant CREB (designated m1) and NF-κB binding sites (designated m2) were generated using the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA, cat #200518) and confirmed by sequencing.
siRNA transfection
To knock-down expression of mRNA targets in fibroblasts and fibrocytes, specific siRNAs and their scrambled controls were transfected at a concentration of 100 nM using RNAi (Qiagen, cat #301605). Following incubations, cell lysates (15 µg protein) were subjected to Western blot analysis to verify transfection efficiency.
Western blot analysis
Cellular proteins were solubilized in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and Halt protease inhibitor mixture (Pierce, cat #87786). Nuclear proteins were prepared using the NE-PER extraction kit (Pierce, cat #78833). Cell protein was quantified (Bio-Rad, cat #500-0001), and samples were boiled in Laemmli SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to Immobilon (Millipore, Temecula, CA). Membranes were incubated with primary Abs overnight at 4°C, washed, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary Abs. ECL reagent (Amersham Biosciences, cat #RPN2109) was used to generate signals. Protein bands were analyzed with a densitometer and normalized against respective β-actin bands.
Quantification of IL-6
Confluent monolayers in 24-well plates were shifted to medium without or with bTSH (5 mU/ml) alone or in combination with the test compounds indicated in medium containing 1% FBS. Each treatment group comprised triplicate wells unless stated otherwise. Medium was collected and subjected to specific ELISA for IL-6. Samples were assayed in triplicate using a standard curve.
CREB and NF-κB DNA binding assays
Binding of nuclear CREB and p65/Rel A to DNA was quantified using TransAM CREB (cat #42096) and TransAM p65/Rel A kits (cat #40096), respectively (Active Motif).
Data analysis
Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Statistical differences were determined with the Student’s t test and significance considered at p<0.05.
Results
bTSH Induces IL-6 Protein and mRNA in Orbital Fibroblasts and Fibrocytes
Levels of basal IL-6 release from untreated orbital fibroblasts and fibrocytes is extremely low, as assessed by ELISA (Fig. 1A). bTSH (5 mU/ml) increased these levels in both cell-types after 16 h (23-fold, p<0.001) The induction is mediated at the pre-translational level (Fig. 1B). Steady-state IL-6 mRNA levels in three orbital fibroblast and fibrocyte strains each from healthy donors and those with GD are dramatically increased. The magnitude of these inductions was 14-fold (p<0.001), 20-fold (p<0.01), 16-fold (p<0.001), and 31-fold (p<0.001), respectively. Thus, responses in fibrocytes appear more vigorous than those in fibroblasts. Moreover, fibrocytes from patients with GD are considerably more responsive than those from healthy donors (p<0.001) (Fig. 1B).
Even at the lowest concentration of bTSH tested (0.05 mIU/mL), IL-6 levels are significantly increased in fibrocytes while the threshold of the effect was 0.1 mIU/ml in orbital fibroblasts (Fig. 2A). The response is near maximal at 5–10 mIU/mL where levels are more than 20-fold above untreated controls. These effects evolve rapidly and by 16 h, IL-6 is increased maximally (24-fold, p<0.0001) (Fig. 2B) while IL-6 mRNA peaks within 6 h (Fig. 2C). These levels return to baseline at 48 h.
To determine whether the induction by TSH of IL-6 requires intermediate protein synthesis, cultures were treated without or with cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) in the absence or presence of bTSH. In fibroblasts, IL-6 mRNA is increased by 29-fold after a 6 h treatment with TSH (Fig. 3A). Cycloheximide fails to affect IL-6 mRNA levels when added as a single agent but when it is combined with TSH it results in a greater than 900-fold induction (p<0.0001 vs control). Results in fibrocytes are almost identical (p<0.0001). Thus, the induction of IL-6 by TSH represents a primary gene induction. Moreover, inhibiting protein synthesis results in a super-induction of IL-6, consistent with the presence of a constitutively active repressor protein in these cells.
Because TSIs rather than TSH activate TSHR in GD and drive hyperthyroidism [12], [13], these mAbs (M22, 2 µg/mL) were tested and found to induce IL-6 after 16 h by 22- and 46–fold in fibroblasts and fibrocytes, respectively (Fig. 1C) (both p<0.001). If the actions of TSH on fibroblasts are mediated through TSHR, fibroblasts from individuals with loss of function TSHR gene mutations may exhibit defects in their responses to TSH. Fibroblast strains from two affected and two unaffected members of a family with such a TSHR mutation [39] were incubated without or with bTSH for 16 h. As Fig. 1D demonstrates, TSH induces IL-6 6.5-fold (p<0.001 vs control) in the fibroblasts from those harboring the mutation while increasing levels 14.4-fold (p<0.001) in cells from the healthy family members (mutant vs healthy p = 0.013). Thus, it would appear that the induction of IL-6 in extra-thyroidal cells such as fibrocytes and orbital fibroblasts is mediated through TSHR and may carry substantial clinical relevance.
TSH Stabilizes IL-6 mRNA
The influence of TSH on IL-6 mRNA stability was determined using DRB, an inhibitor of gene transcription [44]. bTSH retards IL-6 mRNA decay in both fibroblasts and fibrocytes (Fig. 3B). After 12 h, the duration of the study, approximately 50% of the transcript remains detectable in cultures treated with TSH while it becomes undetectable in its absence.
G Protein Abundance, Adenylate Cyclase Expression, and cAMP Generation in Response to bTSH
The dominant signaling downstream from TSHR in thyroid cells involves generation of cAMP [45]. To ascertain whether the same is true in other cells, fibroblasts and fibrocytes were treated with bTSH (5 mU/ml) and cAMP generation determined (Fig. 4A). TSH elicits low amplitude cAMP generation in fibroblasts, a response that was completely absent in fibrocytes. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) induces IL-6 through a cAMP-dependent mechanism in orbital fibroblasts [46]. PGE2 and forskolin increase cAMP levels in these fibroblasts but neither agent provokes detectable cAMP in fibrocytes. Adenylate cyclase mRNA is detected in orbital fibroblasts from both healthy donors and those with GD (Fig. 4B). In stark contrast, the transcript is completely undetectable in 10 different fibrocyte strains, regardless of donor health status (Fig. 4B). Thus, the complete absence of cAMP generation in response to any of the agents tested is explained by the fibrocytes lacking adenylate cyclase expression.
Expression of Gq and Gs mRNAs were next assessed since TSHR couples to both in thyroid cells [45]. Gq and Gs are variably expressed in the fibroblast and fibrocyte strains examined. As Fig. 4C indicates, Gq transcripts are detected in a majority of orbital fibroblast strains and in two of three GD fibrocyte strains but are undetectable in healthy fibrocytes. Expression of Gs mRNA is sporadic in both cell types and absent or at an extremely low level in fibrocytes. As expected, transcripts encoding Gq and Gs are abundant in thyroid tissue. Rp-cAMP, a specific cAMP antagonist and competitive PKA inhibitor [47] fails to alter TSH-induced IL-6 mRNA in either fibroblasts (p = 0.69) or fibrocytes (p = 0.77) (Fig. 4D). Similarly, PKA inhibitors H89 and KT5720 have no effect on TSH-dependent IL-6 expression. These inhibitors were previously shown to be active in TAO fibroblasts treated with PGE2 [46]. Thus, cAMP production and the PKA pathway do not appear to participate in IL-6 induction by TSH in either cell type.
bTSH-induced IL-6 production is Mediated Through AKT and PKC Pathways
AKT plays an important role in mediating TSH actions in thyroid epithelial cells [48]. This pathway was therefore examined in fibroblasts and fibrocytes. AKT levels are considerably higher in fibroblasts than fibrocytes (Fig. 5A). In contrast, fibrocytes exhibit basal phosphorylation of AKT whereas fibroblasts do not. AKTi (1 µM) blocks TSH induction of IL-6 (Fig. 5B). In addition, it attenuates the TSH-dependent phosphorylation of AKT at Serine 473 in both cells (Fig. 5B, Inset). Like AKTi, AKT-targeting siRNA attenuates IL-6 induction by bTSH (Fig. 5C).
Several factors known to induce IL-6 expression act through PKC [49], [50]. GFX, a pan-PKC inhibitor [51], attenuates IL-6 induction by bTSH (64% inhibition in both cell types, p<0.01) (Fig. 6A). On the other hand, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (100 ng/mL) could mimic TSH effects on IL-6, although the magnitude is considerably less (Fig. 6B). This disparity suggests that additional signaling pathways besides PKC may be necessary for maximal induction of IL-6 by TSH. 8-Br-cAMP added alone or in combination with PMA, fails to influence IL-6 in fibrocytes.
The PKC isoenzymes relevant to IL-6 induction by bTSH were next identified. PKCµ is easily detected in orbital fibroblasts but appears absent in fibrocytes (Fig. 6C). In contrast, PKCβII is expressed abundantly by fibrocytes but not by fibroblasts. The divergence of PKC isoenzyme expression is the consequence of dramatically different mRNA levels in fibroblasts and fibrocytes (Fig. 6D). The respective enzymes mediate the induction by TSH of IL-6 in a cell-specific manner. First, phosphorylated PKCµ Ser 916 and PKCβII Ser 660 can be detected following bTSH treatment in fibroblasts and fibrocytes, respectively (Fig. 6E). siRNA targeting PKCµ attenuates IL-6 production in orbital fibroblasts while interrupting PKCβII blocks the induction of IL-6 in fibrocytes (Fig. 6F).
PDK1 Plays a Critical Role in TSHR Signaling in Orbital Fibroblasts and Fibrocytes
PDK1 activates AKT and PKC in several cell-types [52], [53]. Basal phosphorylation of the protein is considerably greater in fibrocytes than in orbital fibroblasts (Fig. 7A). bTSH (5 mU/ml) provokes phosphorylation of PDK1 in both cell types. siRNA targeting PDK1 attenuated IL-6 production by 74% (p<0.001 vs control siRNA) in both cells (Fig. 7B). The siRNA targeting PDK1 attenuates TSH-dependent PKCµ Ser 916 phosphorylation in fibroblasts (Fig. 7C) while the PDK1 inhibitor, OSU-03012 (5 µM) [54] blocks TSH-dependent phosphorylation of PKCµ Ser 916 and PKCβII Ser 660 levels in the respective cell-types (Fig. 7C). The inhibitor also reduces levels of TSH-dependent pAKT Threonine 308 in fibroblasts but fails to do so in fibrocytes (Fig. 7D, 14.4±1.2% and 2.5±0.6%, respectively). Thus it would appear that PDK1 represents an important kinase in TSHR signaling upstream from PKC in both cell types. Its involvement in basal and TSH-dependent phosphorylation of AKT at Threonine 308 appears to diverge in the two cell-types.
Transition from PKCβII Expression in Fibrocytes to PKCµ in Orbital Fibroblasts may be Imposed by CD34− Fibroblasts
CD34+ orbital fibroblasts appear to derive from circulating CD34+ fibrocytes [34]. Moreover, as fibrocytes transition to CD34+ fibroblasts, their phenotype appears to be modified as a consequence of interactions with CD34− fibroblasts [36]. We thus examined whether the pattern of PKC isoenzyme expression in CD34+ fibroblasts (PKCµ) might revert to that of fibrocytes (PKCβII) following separation into a pure CD34+ subset. A parental strain of TAO orbital fibroblasts (mixed CD34+ and CD34−) was sorted into pure CD34+ and CD34− subsets. The mixed strains express PKCµ mRNA, as anticipated, and PKCβII mRNA remains undetectable (Fig. 8). This pattern of PKCµ expression is also found in CD34− cells. In contrast, pure CD34+ fibroblasts express PKCβII while PKCµ mRNA becomes undetectable. Thus, it would appear that removing CD34− fibroblasts restores the pattern PKC expression in CD34+ fibroblasts to one resembling that of fibrocytes.
Up-regulation of IL-6 Expression by bTSH Involves Activation of the IL-6 Gene Promoter
To determine whether TSH upregulates IL-6 gene transcription, a fragment of its promoter, extending from −1168 nt to +3 nt (Fig. 9A), was cloned, fused to a luciferase reporter gene, and transiently transfected into fibrocytes and fibroblasts. bTSH increases promoter activity at 1 h by 5-fold and 4.7- fold, respectively, compared to untreated controls (Figs. 9B and 9C, p<0.001 and p<0.01). Because many TSH actions are mediated through CREB as well as NF-κB [55]–[58], the single CREB binding site identified in this promoter fragment, extending from −213 to −208 nt, was mutated (Fig. 9A). Mutating ACG to GGC and yielding the promoter fragment designated “m1” dramatically attenuates TSH-dependent promoter activity in fibroblasts and fibrocytes by 86% and 79%, respectively, (p<0.001 vs wild-type) (Figs. 9B and 9C). Next, the NF-κB site extending (−73 to −62 nt) [58] was mutated from CCCA to AGAC (fragment “m2”). This mutation too substantially reduces activity (87% and 84%, p<0.001 vs wt, respectively). Thus it would appear that both CREB and NF-κB are both essential to the induction of IL-6 by TSH.
bTSH treatment for 15 min increases nuclear pCREB content (Fig. 10A). Congruently, DNA binding activity exhibited by CREB is also increased (Fig. 10B, fibroblasts, 4.3-fold, p<0.01; fibrocytes, 5.4-fold, p<0.001). Moreover, siRNA targeting CREB attenuates the induction of IL-6 by 56% (p<0.001) and 61%, respectively (p<0.001) (Fig. 10C). Activated AKT lies upstream from phosphorylated CREB [59]. AKTi attenuates TSH-provoked CREB phosphorylation in both cell-types (67% and 59%, respectively) (Fig. 10D). In contrast, GFX reduces TSH-dependent CREB phosphorylation in fibrocytes but failed to do so in fibroblasts (Fig. 10E). TSH also provokes nuclear translocation of p65 and reduces the cytosolic content of IκBα and pIKK (Fig. 11A). The NF-κB inhibitor, PDTC, inhibits IL-6 induction by 75% (p<0.01) (Fig. 11B). Knocking down p65-RelA with a specific siRNA also attenuates the IL-6 induction in both cell types (p<0.001, Fig. 11C). GFX reduces nuclear p65 content in both fibroblasts and fibrocytes (Fig. 11D, Expt.1) while AKTi does the same (Fig. 11D, Expt.2).
Discussion
Orthodoxy has taught that TSHR expression is limited to the thyroid epithelium [1]. This lesson began to change when reports appeared that the receptor could be detected, albeit at relatively low levels, in lymphocytes, skin, and several fatty connective tissue depots [4], [7]. TSH induces IL-6 release from cultured 3T3-L1 cells [26] and human adipocytes [27] but the mechanisms involved have not been explored in detail. Identification of high-level functional TSHR expression by fibrocytes provides renewed impetus for systematically exploring post-receptor signaling pathways utilized in extra-thyroidal cells [34]–[37]. TSHR levels in TAO orbital fibroblasts are considerably lower than those in fibrocytes [36], [60], yet bTSH induces substantial IL-6 production (Figs.1A and 1B) in both cell-types through an up-regulation of gene promoter activity and stabilization of IL-6 mRNA. Our current findings demonstrate that multiple signaling pathways are involved and provide evidence that cross talk between pathways plays an important role. They strongly suggest that the pattern of signaling may diverge from that described previously in thyroid epithelium where cAMP generation results in activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase, AKT, ERK1/2 and Rap1 through the PKA regulatory subunit, RIIβ [61], [62]. In addition to those actions of TSH in thyroid epithelium requiring PKA activation, effects that appear to be completely independent of cAMP generation are emerging. In particular, those initiated by Gβγ are involved with thyroid differentiation and AKT activation in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent and cAMP independent manner [48]. Activation of this pathway reduces the expression of the sodium/iodine symporter through an impact on nuclear PAX-8 content. But PI3K can also be activated by Ras which in turn can be activated by cAMP [63]. Thus the complex cross-talk occurring between cAMP-dependent and -independent pathways can confound the interpretation of results in studies attempting to partition the contribution of specific kinase cascades. This is particularly relevant to dissecting aspects of TSHR signaling that are completely independent of cAMP generation. For this purpose, the fibrocyte appears to represent an outstanding cell model. Adenylate cyclase mRNA is undetectable in these cells and TSH, PGE2, and forskolin all fail to provoke detectable cAMP generation (Fig. 4A). Further, exposure of these cells to exogenous cAMP also fails to induce IL-6 in fibrocytes, reinforcing the conclusion that TSH must be inducing the cytokine through cAMP-independent pathways. The absence of cAMP-dependent pathways in fibrocytes thus allows a very clear delineation of TSH signaling that relies entirely on other cascades. Similarly, those molecular events that exhibit complex, dual regulation with respect to cAMP, such as the regulation of Rap1 by TSH [64], might be further interrogated in fibrocytes to further delineate involvement of multiple signaling pathways. The current findings are congruent with earlier reports by Saunier et al [65]. They found that activation of type II deiodinase in astroglial cells by TSH is mediated through cytosolic phospholipase A2 and that TSH activates ERK through pertussis toxin-insensitive and cAMP-independent mechanisms [66].
From these studies it is evident that AKT, PKC, and PDK1 play dominant roles in post-receptor TSHR signaling in fibroblasts and fibrocytes (Figs. 5–7). But differences emerge between the two cell-types. Basal levels of pAKT (T308 and Ser 473), pPKC, and pPDK1 are considerably higher in fibrocytes than in fibroblasts. This entire cAMP-independent pathway is thus considerably more active in fibrocytes. Another unanticipated divergence relates to the pattern of PKC isoenzyme expression and usage. Fibrocytes and their derivative pure CD34+ orbital fibroblasts express and utilize PKCβII. Interruption of this kinase attenuates TSH signaling (Fig. 6C–6F) while unsorted TAO orbital fibroblasts express PKCµ/PKD, a member of another serine/threonine kinase family [67]. These two distinct enzymes exhibit divergent structural and functional attributes, including substrate specificity [68] and inhibitor susceptibility. They possess dissimilar kinase pseudomains and PKCµ more closely resembles calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II protein kinases [69]. It appears that some factor(s) emanating from CD34− fibroblasts promotes PKCµ expression/usage (Fig. 8). Switching from one enzyme to another may determine the functional phenotype of these fibroblasts. This is the case in models of cardiac hypertrophy [70] and cancer susceptibility [71], [72] where divergent PKC usage impacts cell-specific function. Inhibiting PKC with the pan-PKC-targeting agent, GFX, which also targets PKCµ [73], impairs pCREB in fibrocytes but not in fibroblasts. This divergence suggests that the coupling of PKC to CREB may exhibit isoenzyme specificity and that PKCβII may be far more effective than PKCµ as an upstream effector of CREB activation.
IL-6, like other pleiotropic cytokines, is produced widely in response to multiple stimuli [74]–[79]. It supports B cell function by driving immunoglobulin synthesis and promoting plasma cell differentiation [80]. It regulates fat metabolism [21] and has been implicated in inflammatory processes such as those occurring in TAO [81]. Serum levels of IL-6 are elevated in individuals with GD [19], [82] and are particularly high in those with TAO [83]. Moreover, it can be detected in diseased thyroid and its levels in the TAO orbit appear to correlate with tissue expansion [84]. The current observations identify cAMP independent signaling pathways involved in the regulation by TSH of IL-6 in cells playing central roles in orbital GD. It is possible that a component of the involvement of TSHR in the pathogenesis of TAO might be completely independent of its role in provoking the generation of cAMP. Whether the TSHR molecules utilizing separate post-receptor machinery diverge structurally or functionally from those involved in “traditional” signaling dominating the thyroid is uncertain. Similarly, whether the TSIs activating hormone synthesis within the thyroid might be distinguished in any way from those antibodies acting on fibrocytes in the context of the circulation or within the orbit remains to be determined. Absence of the requisite molecular machinery for cAMP generation in fibrocytes suggests that these cells are ideal for examining alternative pathways involved in TSHR signaling. Further, these findings identify a potentially attractive cohort of therapeutic targets for modulating the inflammatory phenotype of fibrocytes.
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Professors Judy L. Meinkoth, Ph. D., University of Pennsylvania, for helpful discussions and Samuel Refetoff, M.D., University of Chicago, for provision of critical reagents.
Funding Statement
This research was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (nih.gov); EY008976, EY011708, DK063121, and core Center for Vision Research grant EY007003 from the Nuclear Energy Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Szkudlinski MW, Fremont V, Ronin C, Weintraub BD (2002) Thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor structure-function relationships. Physiol Rev 82: 473–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Parmentier M, Libert F, Maenhaut C, Lefort A, Gerard C, et al. (1989) Molecular cloning of the thyrotopin receptor. Science 246: 1620–1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Vassart G, Dumont JE (1992) The thyrotropin receptor and the regulation of thyrocyte function and growth. Endocrine Rev 13: 96–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Endo T, Ohta K, Haraguchi K, Onaya T (1995) Cloning and functional expression of a thyrotropin receptor cDNA from rat fat cells. J Biol Chem 270: 10833–10837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bell A, Gagnon A, Grunder L, Parikh SJ, Smith TJ, et al. (2000) Functional TSH receptor in human abdominal preadipocytes and orbital fibroblasts. Am J Physiol (Cell Physiol) 279: C335–C340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Klein JR (2003) Physiological relevance of thyroid stimulating hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor in tissues other than the thyroid. Autoimmunity 36: 417–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Davies TF, Teng CS, McLachlan SM, Smith BR, Hall R (1978) Thyrotropin receptors in adipose tissue, retro-orbital tissue and lymphocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 9: 303–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Heufelder AE, Dutton CM, Sarkar G, Donovan KA, Bahn RS (1993) Detection of TSH receptor RNA in cultured fibroblasts from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy and pretibial dermopathy. Thyroid 3: 297–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Paschke R, Metcalfe A, Alcalde L, Vassart G, Weetman A, et al. (1994) Presence of nonfunctional thyrotropin receptor variant transcripts in retroocular and other tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79: 1234–1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Marcus C, Ehren H, Bolme P, Arner P (1988) Regulation of lipolysis during the neonatal period. Importance of thyrotropin. J Clin Invest 82: 1793–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Brent GA (2008) Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 358: 2594–2605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zakarija M, McKenzie JM (1987) The spectrum and significance of autoantibodies reacting with the thyrotropin receptor. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 16: 343–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zakarija M, Jin S, McKenzie JM (1988) Evidence supporting the identity in Graves’ disease of thyroid-stimulating antibody and thyroid growth-promoting immunoglobulin G as assayed in FRTL5 cells. J Clin Invest81: 879–884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Davies TF, Ando T, Lin RY, Tomer Y, Latif R (2005) Thyrotropin receptor-associated diseases: from adenomata to Graves’ disease. J Clin Invest 115: 1972–1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kazim M, Goldberg RA, Smith TJ (2002) Insights into the pathogenesis of thyroid-associated orbitopathy. Evolving rationale for therapy. Arch Ophthalmol 120: 380–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Grubeck-Loebenstein B, Trieb K, Sztankay A, Holter W, Anderl H, et al. (1994) Retrobulbar T cells from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy are CD8+ and specifically recognize autologous fibroblasts. J Clin Invest 93: 2738–2743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jaume JC, Portolano S, Prummel MF, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B (1994) Molecular cloning and characterization of genes for antibodies generated by orbital tissue-infiltrating B-cells in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78: 348–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. De’Carli M, D’Elios MM, Mariotti S, Marcocci C, Pinchera A, et al. (1993) Cytolytic T cells with Th1-like cytokine profile predominate in retroorbital lymphocytic infiltrates of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77: 1120–1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Salvi M, Girasole G, Pedrazzoni M, Passeri M, Giuliani N, et al. (1996) Increased serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble IL-6 receptor in patients with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 2976–2979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Taga T, Kishimoto T (1997) GP130 and the interleukin-6 family of cytokines. Annu Rev Immunol 15: 797–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hirano T (1998) Interleukin 6 and its receptor: ten years later. Int Rev Immunol 16, 249–284. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22. Muraguchi A, Kishimoto T, Miki Y, Kuritani T, Kaieda T, et al. (1981) T cell-replacing factor- (TRF) induced IgG secretion in a human B blastoid cell line and demonstration of acceptors for TRF. J Immunol 127: 412–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Miyazawa K, Mori A, Miyata H, Akahane M, et al. (1998) Regulation of interleukin-1β-induced interleukin-6 gene expression in human fibroblast-like synoviocytes by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem 273: 24832–24838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Brown CY, Lagnade CA, Goodall GJ (1996) A cytokine mRNA-destabilizing element that is structurally and functionally distinct from A+U-rich elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 13721–13725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Grubeck-loebenstein B, Buchan G, Chantry D, Kassal H, Londei M, et al. (1989) Analysis of intrathyroidal cytokine production in thyroid autoimmune disease: thyroid follicular cells produce interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-6. Clin Exp Immunol 77: 324–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Antunes T, Gagnon A, Bell A, Sorisky A (2005) Thyroid-stimulating hormone stimulates interleukin-6 release from 3T3-L1 adipocytes through a cAMP-protein kinase A pathway. Obesity Res 13: 2066–2071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bell A, Gagnon A Sorisky A (2003) TSH stimulates IL-6 secretion from adipocytes in culture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23: e65–e66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Bucala R, Spiegel LA, Chesney J, Hogan M, Cerami A (1994) Circulating fibrocytes define a new leukocyte subpopulation that mediates tissue repair. Mol Med 1: 71–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Abe R, Donnelly SC, Peng T, Bucala R, Metz CN (2001) Peripheral blood fibrocytes: differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites. J Immunol 166: 7556–7562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Phillips RJ, Burdick MD, Hong K, Lutz MA, Murray LA, et al. (2004) Circulating fibrocytes traffic to the lungs in response to CXCL12 and mediate fibrosis. J Clin Invest 114: 438–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chesney J, Bacher M, Bender A, Bucala R (1997) The peripheral blood fibrocyte is a potent antigen-presenting cell capable of priming naive T cells in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (94) 6307–6312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Pilling D, Fan T, Huang D, Kaul B, Gomer RH (2009) Identification of markers that distinguish monocyte-derived fibrocytes from monocytes, macrophages, and fibroblast. PLoS One 4 7475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Schmidt M, Sun G, Stacey MA, Mori L, Mattoli S (2003) Identification of circulating fibrocytes as precursors of bronchial myofibroblasts in asthma. J Immunol 171: 380–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Douglas RS, Afifiyan NF, Hwang CJ, Chong K, Haider U, et al. (2010) Increased generation of fibrocytes in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 430–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Smith TJ, Padovani-Claudio DA, Lu Y, Raychaudhuri N, Fernando R, et al. (2011) Fibroblasts expressing the thyrotropin receptor overarch thyroid and orbit in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96: 3827–3837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Fernando R, Atkins S, Raychaudhuri N, Lu Y, Li B, et al. (2012) Human fibrocytes coexpress thyroglobulin and thyrotropin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109: 7427–7432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gillespie EF, Papageorgiou KI, Fernando R, Raychaudhuri N, Cockerham KP, et al. (2012) Increased expression of TSH receptor by fibrocytes in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy leads to chemokine production. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97: E740–E746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Smith TJ, Sempowski GD, Wang HS, Del Vecchio PJ, Lippe SD, et al. (1995) Evidence for cellular heterogeneity in primary cultures of human orbital fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 2620–2625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sunthornthepvarakul T, Gottschalk ME, Hayashi Y, Refetoff S (2004) Brief report: resistance to thyrotropin caused by mutations in the thyrotropin-receptor gene. N Engl J Med 332: 155–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Davidson LA, Aymond CM, Jiang YH, Turner ND, Lupton JR, et al. (1998) Non-invasive detection of fecal protein kinase C βII and ζ messenger RNA; putative biomarkers for colon cancer. Carcinogenesis 19: 253–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Cheng L, Pricolo V, Biancani P, Behar J (2008) Overexpression of progesterone receptor B increases sensitivity of human colon muscle cells of progesterone. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 295: G493–G502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Freson K, Thys C, Wittevrongel C, Proesmans W, Hoylaerts MF, et al. (2002) Pseudohypoparathyroidism type IB with disturbed imprinting in the GNAS1 cluster and Gsa deficiency in platelets. Hum Mol Genet 11: 2741–2750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Chen B, Tsui S, Smith TJ (2005) IL-1 beta induces IL-6 expression in human orbital fibroblasts: identification of an anatomic-site specific phenotypic attribute relevant to thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Immunol 15: 1310–1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Dreyer C, Hausen P (1978) Inhibition of mammalian RNA polymerase by 5,6 dichlororibofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) and DRB triphosphate. Nucleic Acids Res 5: 3325–3335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kero J, Ahmed K, Wettschureck N, Tunaru S, Wintermantel T, et al. (2007) Thyrocyte-specific Gq/G11 deficiency impairs thyroid function and prevents goiter development. J Clin Invest 117: 2399–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Raychaudhuri N, Douglas RS, Smith TJ (2010) PGE2 induces IL-6 in orbital fibroblasts through EP2 receptors and increased gene promoter activity: implications to thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. PLoS One 5: e15296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Botelho LH, Rothermel JD, Coombs RV, Jastorff B (1988) cAMP analog antagonists of cAMP action. Meth Enzymol 159: 159–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zaballos MA, Garcia B, Santisteban P (2008) Gβγ dimers released in response to thyrotropin activate phosphoinositide 3-kinase and regulate gene expression in thyroid cells. Mol Endocrinol 22: 1183–1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lankov I, Praskova M, Kalenderova S, Tencheva Z, Mitov I, et al. (2002) The effect of chemical blockade of PKC with Gö6976 and Gö6983 on proliferation and MAPK activity in IL-6-dependent plasmacytoma cells. Leukemia Res 26: 363–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Sanders JL, Stern PH (2000) Protein kinase C involvement in interleukin-6 production by parathyroid hormone and tumor necrosis factor-α in UMR-106 osteoblastic cells. J Bone Miner Res 15: 885–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Toullec D, Pianetti P, Coste H, Bellevergue P, Grand-Perret T, et al. (1991) The bisindolylmaleimide GF 109203X is a potent and selective inhibitor of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem. 266: 15771–15781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Alessi DR, James SR, Downes CP, Holmes AB, Gaffney PR, Reese CB, Cohen P (1997) Characterization of a 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase which phosphorylates and activates protein kinase B alpha. Curr Biol 7: 261–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Le Good JA, Ziegler WH, Parekh DB, Alessi DR, Cohen P, et al. (1998) Protein kinase C isotypes controlled by phosphoinositide 3-kinase through the protein kinase PDK1. Science 281: 2042–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zhu J, Huang JW, Tseng PH, Fowble J, Shiau CW, et al. (2004) From the Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor Celecoxib to a novel class of 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 inhibitors. Cancer Research 64: 4309–4318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Woloshin RI, Walton KM, Rehfuss RP, Goodman RH, Cone RD (1992) 3′,5′- Cyclic adenosine monophosphate-regulated enhancer binding (CREB) activity is required for normal growth and differentiated phenotype in the FRTL5 thyroid follicular cell line. Mol Endocrinol 6: 1725–1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nguyen LQ, Kopp P, Martinson F, Stanfield K, Roth SI, et al. (2000) A dominant negative CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) isoform inhibits thyrocyte growth, thyroid-specific gene expression, differentiation, and function. Mol Endocrinol 14: 1448–1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Morshed SA, Latif R, Davies TF (2009) Characterization of thyrotropin receptor antibody-induced signaling cascades. Endocrinology 150: 519–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Tayze T, Antunes AG, Langille ML, Sorisky A (2008) Thyroid-stimulating hormone induces Interleukin-6 release from human adipocytes through activation of the nuclear factor-κB pathway. Endocrinology 149: 3062–3066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Du K, Montimony M (1998) CREB is a regulatory target for the protein kinase Akt/PKB. J Biol Chem 273: 32377–32379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Tsui S, Naik N, Hoa N, Hwang C J, Afifiyan NF, et al. (2008) Evidence for an association between thyroid-stimulating hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors: a tale of two antigens implicated in Graves’ disease. J Immunol 181: 4397–4405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Porcellini A, Messina S, De Gregorio G, Feliciello A, Carlucci A, et al. (2003) The expression of the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase RII beta regulatory subunit confers TSH-cAMP-dependent growth to mouse fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 278: 40621–40630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hara T, Namba H, Takamura N, Yang TT, NagayamaY, et al (1999) Thyrotropin regulates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activity through two distinct signal pathways in human thyroid cells. Endocrinology 140: 1724–1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Pham N, Cheglakov I, Koch CA, de Hoog CL, Moran MF, et al. (2000) The guanine nucleotide exchange factor CNrasGEF activates Ras in response to cAMP and cGMP. Current Biology 10: R577–R580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Tsygankova OM, Saavedra A, Rebhun JF, Quilliam LA, Meinkoth JL (2001) Coordinated regulation of Rap1 and thyroid differentiation by cyclic AMP and protein kinase A. Mol Cell Biol. 21: 1921–1929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Saunier B, Pierre M, Jacquemin C, Courtin F (1993) Evidence for cAMP-independent thyrotropin effects on astroglial cells. Eur J Biochem 218: 1091–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Saunier B, Tournier C, Jacquemin C, Pierre M (1995) Stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by thyrotropin in primary cultured human thyroid follicles. J Biol Chem 270: 3693–3697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Johannes F, Prestle J, Eis S, Oberhangenamm P, Pfizenmaier K (1994) PKCµ is a novel, atypical member of the protein kinase C family. J Biol Chem 269: 6140–6148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Nishikawa K, Toker A, Johannes FJ, Songyang Z, Cantley L (1997) Determination of the specific substrate sequence motifs of protein kinase C isozymes. J Biol Chem 272: 952–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Reyland M (2009) Protein kinase C: multi-functional regulators of cell life and death. Front Biosci 14: 2386–2399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Bowman JC, Steinberg SF, Jiang T, Geenen DL, Fishman GI, et al. (1997) Expression of protein kinase c beta in the heart causes hypertrophy in adult mice and sudden death in neonates. J Clin Invest 100: 2189–2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Sledge G W, Gokmen-Polar Y (2006) Protein kinase C-beta as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Semin Oncol 33: S15–S18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Martiny-Baron G, Fabbro D (2007) Classical PKC isoforms in cancer. Pharm Res 55, 477–486. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 73. Konopatskaya O, Matthews AS, Matthew TH, Gilio K, Cosemans JM, et al. (2011) Protein kinase C mediates platelet secretion and thrombus formation through protein kinase D2. Blood. 118: 416–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Naka T, Nishimoto N, Kishimoto T (2002) The paradigm of IL-6: from basic science to medicine. Arthritis Res 4: S233–S242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Grassl C, Bruno L, Detlef S, Ulrich D (1999) Transcriptional regulation of the interleukin-6 gene in messengial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1466–1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Legrand-Poels D, Schoonbroodt S, Piette J (2000) Regulation of interleukin-6 gene expression by pro-inflammatory cytokines in a colon cancer cell line. Biochem J 349: 765–773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Motomura T, Kasayama S, Takagi M, Kurebayashi S, Matsui H, et al. (1998) Increased interleukin-6 production in mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells expressing activating mutant of the stimulatory G protein. J Bone Miner Res 13: 1084–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Sehgal PB (1992) Regulation of IL6 gene expression. Res Immunol 143: 724–734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Martin CA, Dorf ME (1991) Differential regulation of interleukin-6, macrophage inflammatory protein-1, and JE/MCP-1 cytokine expression in macrophage cell-lines. CellImmunol 135: 245–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Lichtenstein A, Tu Y, Fady C, Vescio R, Berenson J (1995) Interleukin-6 inhibits apoptosis of malignant plasma cells. Cell Immunol 162: 248–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Ishihara K, Hirano T (2002) IL-6 in autoimmune disease and chronic inflammatory proliferative disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 13: 357–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Salvi M, Pedrazzoni M, Girasole G, Guiliani N, Minelli R, et al. (2000) Serum concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in Graves’ disease: effect of treatment, thyroid function, ophthalmopathy and cigarette smoking. Eur J Endocrinol 143: 197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Molnár I, Balázs C (1997) High circulating IL-6 level in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Autoimmunity 25: 91–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Hiromatsu Y, Yang D, Bednarczuk T, Miyake I, Nonaka K, et al. (2000) Cytokine profiles in eye muscle tissue and orbital fat tissue from patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 1194–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]