Abstract
Early transfer RNA (tRNA) processing events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are coordinated in the nucleolus, the site normally associated with ribosome biosynthesis. To test whether spatial organization of the tRNA pathway begins with nucleolar clustering of the genes, we have probed the subnuclear location of five different tRNA gene families. The results show that tRNA genes, though dispersed in the linear genome, colocalize with 5S ribosomal DNA and U14 small nucleolar RNA at the nucleolus. Nucleolar localization requires tRNA gene transcription-complex formation, because inactivation of the promoter at a single locus removes its nucleolar association. This organization of tRNA genes must profoundly affect the spatial packaging of the genome and raises the question of whether gene types might be coordinated in three dimensions to regulate transcription.
Little is known about how specific nuclear genes are arranged in three dimensions, although the position of some chromosome regions are dynamic and responsive to the general transcription state (1). Examples of documented DNA positions are the telomeric regions, preferentially found near the nuclear periphery in yeast, and the tandemly repeated ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, which create distinctive nucleolar structures where ribosome assembly is coordinated.
Components of the early tRNA processing pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other eukaryotes are often at the nucleolus (2–5), and additional observations suggest that transcription of the tRNA genes might also be nucleolar. Transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is suppressed in the vicinity of tRNA genes (6, 7), and promoters for Pol II are underrepresented within 500 base pairs upstream of tRNA genes, with the exception of Ty retrotransposons (8, 9). This silencing near tRNA genes is relieved by a mutation in the rRNA processing enzyme, CBF5 (10). These observations suggest that tRNA and rRNA biogenesis might be coordinated at the nucleolus and that spatial coordination might begin by localizing the tRNA genes at the nucleolus (10). Such a clustering of tRNA genes would create a region that was highly concentrated for Pol III as well as Pol I transcription. In yeast, the Pol III–transcribed 5S rRNA genes are nucleolar by definition, because they adjoin the large rRNA gene repeats (11). Nucleolar localization of 5S rRNA genes has also been found in higher eukaryotes (12–16), in which the 5S gene clusters are not attached to the large rRNA genes in the linear DNA.
We investigated the location of five different families of tRNA genes: tRNALeu(CAA) and tRNALys(CUU), which contain introns, and tRNAGly(GCC), tRNAGln(UUG), and tRNAGlu(UUC), which do not contain introns. Each family contains 9 to 16 genes at scattered positions throughout the yeast genome (fig. S1). Fluorescent oligonucleotide probes specific for the antisense strand of the genes were hybridized to fixed, permeabilized yeast, and the signal was compared to that obtained with probes to either a small nucleolar RNA (U14 snoRNA) or a known nucleolar DNA segment from chromosome XII, the 5S rRNA gene (17).
Most of the signal from all five families of tRNA genes overlaps the 5S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) at the nucleolus (Fig. 1). The tRNA genes tend to be on the periphery of the 5S rDNA signal, but it is not clear whether they are within or at the edge of the nucleolus (5S rDNA and U14 snoRNA positions). tRNA gene probes were specific for DNA, because the signal was sensitive to deoxyribonuclease but not ribonuclease or proteinase (fig. S2). We are probably able to detect only clustered tRNA genes; individual genes would likely fall below the detection limit. Consistent with this, some pre-tRNAs are nucleoplasmic, although most of the pre-tRNA signal is nucleolar (2, 8, 18, 19). The nucleolar signal is specific to tRNA genes, because telomeric probes give a signal in the nucleoplasm and nuclear periphery, as expected (20).
To test whether tRNA gene position is dependent on Pol III transcription, we compared the position of a single tRNA gene locus, SUP53 on chromosome III (Fig. 2), to the position of the same locus after the SUP53 promoter had been inactivated by point mutations that precluded stable association of all Pol III transcription-complex components (21). When the tRNA gene is active, the SUP53 signal overlaps the nucleolar signal ~50% of the time, which is substantially more frequent than the signal overlap that occurs when the tRNA gene is inactive (52% of 440 cells compared with 13% of 715 cells). Similar distributions of the locus were found when the same active and inactive tRNA genes were placed with URA3 on a low-copy plasmid (7) (fig. S3). These results suggest that a given tRNA gene might not necessarily be found continuously at the nucleolus but that the tendency for nucleolar association is dependent on some aspect of transcription-complex formation.
To test whether tRNA gene clustering is sensitive to nucleolar perturbation, we probed the tRNALeu family in cells with a nonlethal deletion of the Pol I subunit, Δrpa49 (Fig. 3), which compromises Pol I transcription and results in a less compact nucleolus than normal (22) (Fig. 3). In keeping with results from previous nucleolar disruption (10), the pre-tRNA transcript signal in Δrpa49 disperses into the nucleoplasm. The tRNA gene signal disappears, because the dispersed tRNA genes no longer individually produce enough of a signal to be seen above the background fluorescence. We conclude that tRNA gene localization is, to some extent, dependent on normal rRNA biosynthesis in the nucleolus.
Clustering tRNA genes near 5S rRNA genes in the nucleolus forms a nuclear subregion specializing in Pol III transcription. Transcription complexes on 5S rRNA genes and tRNA genes both contain Pol III and two multisubunit transcription factors, TFIIIB and TFIIIC, although the 5S rRNA genes require one extra recognition factor, TFIIIA (23). Spatial coordination of the Pol III–transcribed genes would allow concentration of these factors, as well as initiating nucleolar organization of the early tRNA processing pathway (1, 9).
Localization of most tRNA genes to the yeast nucleolus has drastic implications for three-dimensional genome organization, because the genes are scattered throughout the linear genome map (fig. S1). It is not clear whether these results reflect the organization of tRNA genes in metazoans. There is currently little information on the position of actively transcribed tRNA-class promoters in metazoans, including both tRNA genes and short interspersed nuclear elements (24). Further, morphology of nucleoli in multicellular eukaryotes is distinct from the single nucleolus in yeast.
The clustering of tRNA genes in subnuclear regions specific for Pol III expression (or Pol I and Pol III expression) is consistent with Pol II transcription being relatively poor near actively transcribed tRNA genes (7, 10) and with Pol II promoters being underrepresented near tRNA genes (9). A case of transcription-unit segregation, the rRNA genes in nucleoli, results in the exclusion of Pol II from nucleoli and the silencing of Pol II transcription units when they are inserted between rRNA gene repeats (25). If Pol III transcription units are also localizing in or near the nucleolus, Pol II transcription might be suppressed by either simple exclusion of transcription components or a more active mechanism. This clustering of tRNA genes in specialized subnuclear locations might also partially explain why propagating a chromatin-modeling signal beyond a tRNA gene is difficult, as observed in cases where tRNA genes serve as boundary elements for chromatin domains (26, 27).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank A. Hopper and members of the Engelke lab for experimental suggestions, and D. Thiele, E. Phisicky, and J. Abelson for helpful comments on the manuscript. Supported by research grant GM63142 from NIH.
Footnotes
Supporting Online Material www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/302/5649/1399/DC1
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S3
References
References and Notes
- 1.Gasser SM. Science. 2002;296:1412. doi: 10.1126/science.1067703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bertrand E, Houser-Scott F, Kendall A, Singer RH, Engelke DR. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2463. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.16.2463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lee B, Matera AG, Ward DC, Craft J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996;93:11471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jacobson MR, Cao L-G, Taneja K, Singer RH, Wang Y-L. J. Cell Sci. 1997;110:829. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.7.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jarrous N, Wolenski JS, Wesolowski D, Lee C, Altman S. J. Cell Biol. 1999;146:559. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kinsey PT, Sandmeyer SB. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:1317. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.6.1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hull MW, Erickson J, Johnston M, Engelke DR. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994;14:3244. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Boeke JD, Sandmeyer SB. In: The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Broach J, Jones E, Pringle J, editors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; Cold Spring Harbor, NY: 1991. pp. 193–261. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bolton EC, Boeke JD. Genome Res. 2003;13:254. doi: 10.1101/gr.612203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kendall A, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001;97:13108. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee Y, Erkine AM, Van Ryke VI, Nazar RN. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:634. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.4.634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Metzenberg RL, Stevens JN, Selker EU, Morzycka-Wroblewska E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985;82:2067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.7.2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Narayanswami S, Hamkalo BA. Cytometry. 1990;11:144. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990110117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaplan FS, et al. Genomics. 1993;15:123. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Highett MI, Beven AF, Shaw PJ. J. Cell Sci. 1993;105:1151. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.4.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Montijn MB, Noutsmuller AB, tenHoopen R, Oud JL, Nanninga N. Chromosome Res. 1999;7:387. doi: 10.1023/a:1009272115295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online and are derived from protocols at http://singerlab.aecom.yu.edu/protocols/insitu_yeast.htm.
- 18.O’Connor JP, Peebles CL. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991;11:425. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.1.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sarkar S, Hopper AK. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1998;11:3041. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.11.3041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hediger F, Neumann FR, Van Houwe G, Dubrana K, Gasser SM. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:2076. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01338-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huibregtse JM, Engelke DR. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989;4:3244. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liljelund P, Sariotte S, Buhler JM, Sentenac A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992;89:9302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Paule MR, White RJ. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:1283. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.6.1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Deininger PL, Batzer MA. Genome Res. 2002;12:1455. doi: 10.1101/gr.282402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Smith JS, Boeke JD. Genes Dev. 1997;11:241. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.2.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Donze D, Adams CR, Rine J, Kamakaka RT. Genes Dev. 1999;13:698. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.6.698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Donze D, Kamakaka RT. EMBO J. 2001;20:520. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.3.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. The Saccharomyces Genome Database is available at http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.