Abstract
During the final stages of Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis fifteen nurse cells, sister cells to the oocyte, degenerate as part of normal development. This process involves at least two cell death mechanisms, caspase-dependent cell death and autophagy, as indicated by apoptosis and autophagy markers. In addition, mutations affecting either caspases or autophagy partially reduce nurse cell removal, leaving behind end-stage egg chambers with persisting nurse cell nuclei. To determine whether apoptosis and autophagy work in parallel to degrade and remove these cells as is the case with salivary glands during pupariation, we generated mutants doubly affecting caspases and autophagy. We found no significant increase in either the number of late stage egg chambers containing persisting nuclei or in the number of persisting nuclei per egg chamber in the double mutants compared to single mutants. These findings suggest that there is another cell death mechanism functioning in the ovary to remove all nurse cell remnants from late stage egg chambers.
Introduction
Programmed cell death (PCD) is a conserved mechanism for eliminating excess cells during development and for maintaining homeostasis within an organism by removing unnecessary or unhealthy cells. PCD can involve several diverse cell death mechanisms such as apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis, and is genetically controlled. While mechanisms of apoptosis are fairly well understood, other cell death types are not. PCD in the Drosophila ovary occurs by unusual mechanisms, making it a powerful model for alternative forms of cell death.
The Drosophila ovary is made up of hundreds of developing egg chambers that are contained in tubular structures called ovarioles. Each egg chamber begins formation at the anterior tip of the ovariole when one germline-derived cell, produced by asymmetric cell division from a stem cell, divides four times to form a cyst containing one oocyte and fifteen nurse cells. Somatic follicle cells surround the germline cyst to form the outer epithelial cell layer of the egg chamber [1]. As development proceeds through 14 distinct stages, the oocyte, fed by the nurse cells, increases in size, and becomes enclosed by the chorion, or eggshell, which is produced by the follicle cells [2].
Near the end of oogenesis, the fifteen large nurse cells transfer their cytoplasmic contents to the oocyte, the remaining nurse cell nuclei condense, and most of the nuclei disappear by stage 14 [1], [2]. Unlike the nurse cell nuclei observed in mid-stage dying egg chambers induced by starvation [3], [4], late stage nuclei do not fragment but remain intact and continue condensing until they disappear completely [2]. The nurse cells stain positively in stages 12–13 with LysoTracker, autophagic markers, TUNEL, and antibodies against active caspases, suggesting that both apoptosis and autophagy are involved in the process of nurse cell removal [5]–[11].
Nurse cell nuclei that fail to be removed by stage 14 can be observed as bright DAPI-stained discs at the anterior end of the egg chamber, hereafter referred to as persisting nuclei (PN). Mutants defective in either autophagy or apoptosis have been shown to display an increase in the number of stage 14 egg chambers containing PN compared to wild-type [8], [12], [13], however the large majority of nurse cell nuclei are cleared by stage 14 in these mutants. One possible explanation for the mild phenotype is that both processes cooperate to remove nurse cells. Indeed, studies on the persistence of salivary gland tissue in pupae mutant for both autophagy and apoptosis suggest that these processes can act in combination during development to remove cells completely [14].
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether suppressing autophagy and apoptosis at the same time in the ovary could block nurse cell removal more completely, which would be observed as an increase in the number of egg chambers containing PN or the number of nuclei persisting in each egg chamber. Ovarian mutants affecting apoptosis, autophagy or both at the same time were studied for the presence of PN in stage 14 egg chambers. We found that there was an increase over controls in the number of egg chambers containing PN in mutants affecting either autophagy or apoptosis, consistent with previous studies, however blocking both autophagy and apoptosis at the same time did not increase the number of PN significantly and did not approach a complete block in nurse cell removal. This suggests that either there is an alternative cell death mechanism in the ovary, or there is a compensatory process that is activated when both apoptosis and autophagy are suppressed, removing the remainder of nurse cell nuclei by the end of oogenesis.
Results
Inhibiting Both Caspases and Autophagy does not Abolish Nurse Cell Death in Late Stage Egg Chambers
Normal late stage egg chambers show death of the nurse cells and condensation of their nuclei [2], with LysoTracker-positive organelles in the spaces around the nuclei beginning in stage 12 [7] ( Figs. 1A to 1A ′′). LysoTracker is a pH sensitive probe that labels lysosomes and other acidified organelles. LysoTracker staining becomes more intense and fills the remaining nuclei in stage 13 ( Figs. 1B ′ and 1B′′), an indication that acidification has occurred.
Atg7 is an E1-like enzyme that activates Atg8 and Atg12 during autophagy [15]–[16]. Viable hybrids of the Atg7d14 and Atg7d77 alleles were used to inhibit autophagy and these were recombined with the Prev1 mutant allele of the effector caspase Dcp-1 [17], which shows a strong inhibition of apoptotic events in mid-oogenesis. When late stage egg chambers of these double mutants were examined, they were similar in appearance to single mutants and controls. Figs. 1C , C′ and C′′, show nurse cell nuclei of the double mutant Atg7 Dcp-1 that have condensed normally and show LysoTracker staining that is indistinguishable from that of the control ( Figs. 1C ′′ and 1B′′). Thus, in late stage Atg7 Dcp-1 doubly mutant egg chambers the acidification of nurse cells was not disrupted and most of the nurse cell nuclei disappeared.
Because some stage 14 egg chambers from Atg7 Dcp-1 mutants showed PN (although the number of nurse cells persisting in any individual egg chamber was small) the precise number of PN was determined in mutants where both autophagy and caspases were inhibited ( Fig. 1D ). Quantification confirmed that combined inhibition of Atg7 and Dcp-1 did not show a stronger phenotype than single mutants. Since caspases besides Dcp-1 could play a role in nurse cell removal, we used nanos-Gal4 to over-express Diap1 in the germline cells of mutant ovaries. Diap1 encodes an Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein (IAP) that inhibits multiple caspases. We confirmed that Diap1 was being over-expressed under these conditions using immunocytochemistry (Fig. S1). Furthermore, we confirmed that the over-expressed Diap1 was functional in the germline because it was able to completely block starvation-induced cell death in mid-oogenesis [6], [13] (Table S1). To block both Atg7 and caspases we generated flies of the genotype UASp-Diap1/+; Atg7d77/ Atg7d14; nanos-Gal4/ + (hereafter abbreviated as Atg7 nos-Diap1) where Diap1 is expressed in the germline under the control of the nanos promoter.
We have observed, in the case of some mutants, that the number of PN found in stage 14 egg chambers is affected by the nutritional status of the flies (JSP, unpublished observations). Therefore, we subjected all experimental flies either to feeding or starvation before dissection. Ovaries from the mutants described above and controls were dissected, and the numbers of egg chambers having PN in stage 14 egg chambers as well as the number of nuclei persisting per egg chamber were quantified.
In control flies, the number of egg chambers showing PN in stage 14 was under 10% whether the flies were well-fed or starved ( Table 1 , Fig. 1D ). In the single mutants, Atg7, Dcp-1 or nos-Diap1, the ovaries from well-fed flies showed an increase in PN to an average of 30±8.74% at the most in fed flies while the numbers for starved flies was 22.83±5.05% or less. When PN values of fed, single mutants were compared to controls, the mutants had a significantly greater number of PN than controls (p<.05: see figure legend for details). In the double mutants, Atg7 Dcp-1 and Atg7 nos-Diap1 (fed flies), the PN numbers for fed flies were very close to controls, while starved flies had numbers similar to the single mutant Atg7d14/d77. The Atg7 Dcp-1 double mutants that were fed had a PN value that was not significantly different from controls (p>.05). The Atg7 nos-Diap1 double mutants had a PN value that was significantly different from controls (p <.05), however, the double mutant surprisingly showed fewer PN than single mutants.
Table 1. Quantification of persisting nurse cell nuclei in stage 14 egg chambers.
Genotype | %PN3, Fed4 | 2 s.d.5 | n6 | %PN3, Stv7 | 2 s.d.5 | n6 |
Cy Sib | 8.3 | 3.39 | 265 | 7.99 | 2.34 | 538 |
Atg7 | 30 | 8.74 | 110 | 7.85 | 2.41 | 497 |
Dcp-1 | 23.87 | 4.84 | 310 | 14.77 | 2.66 | 711 |
nos-Diap1 1 | 19.78 | 4.78 | 278 | 22.83 | 5.05 | 276 |
Atg7 nos-Diap1 | 3.76 | 2.79 | 186 | 13.73 | 4.00 | 306 |
Atg7 Dcp-1 | 9.55 | 2.71 | 471 | 11.98 | 2.90 | 501 |
Sb Control | 8.7 | 4.15 | 184 | 2.94 | 1.75 | 374 |
w1118 Control | 16.1 | 6.77 | 118 | 8.15 | 2.33 | 552 |
Atg1 GLC | 31.15 | 8.39 | 122 | 27.76 | 5.34 | 281 |
nos-Diap1 2 | 19.29 | 6.67 | 140 | 12.77 | 5.62 | 141 |
Atg1 GLC nos-Diap1 | 32.38 | 9.13 | 105 | 32.35 | 11.35 | 68 |
Atg1 FCC | 29.21 | 6.82 | 178 | 13.68 | 3.79 | 329 |
FCC Sib Control | 39.39 | 8.51 | 132 | 23.48 | 5.22 | 264 |
indicates siblings from the Atg7 cross;
indicates siblings from the GLC cross;
Persisting nurse cell nuclei ;
well-fed on yeast paste;
indicates 2 standard deviations from the mean;
the number of stage 14 egg chambers that were scored;
starved.
As shown in Fig. 1D , the number of nuclei persisting in each egg chamber in controls and mutants was 3 or fewer with the exception of starved Atg7 nos-Diap1 flies which showed a small percentage of egg chambers with 4–6 PN per egg chamber. These data indicate that the death and removal of nurse cell nuclei cannot be completely blocked by combined disruption of Atg7 and caspases since the majority of the original 15 nurse cells were eliminated.
Atg1 Germline Clones Show Only a Slight Increase in Persisting Nurse Cell Nuclei which is not Enhanced by Expression of Diap1
Atg1, a serine/threonine kinase, is another key regulator of autophagy [18]. Since Atg1 mutants are homozygous lethal in the pupal stage [19], it was necessary to make germline clones (GLCs) to study its effects. To investigate the occurrence of PN in Atg1 mutants, we produced Atg1 germline clones (Atg1 GLC), using the ovoD1 mutation and the heat shock-FLP/FRT system [20]. When this technique is used, only egg chambers containing germline cells homozygous for the Atg1 mutation are able to develop. In the Atg1 GLCs, autophagy should be inhibited in germ cells, and in the combination Atg1 GLC nos-GAL4 UASp-Diap1 (hereafter referred to as Atg1 GLC nos-Diap1), both autophagy and apoptosis should be inhibited in the germ cells. The phenotype of late stage egg chambers of Atg1 GLC, Atg1 GLC nos-Diap1, or nos-Diap1 alone had nearly identical phenotypes with respect to persisting nurse cell nuclei when compared to controls, as shown in Fig. S2A–D. The number of PN in each of the experimental genotypes was quantified and shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2 . Consistent with previous findings, controls showed low numbers of PN in fed flies and significantly fewer in starved flies (p<.05). Egg chambers from the Atg1 GLC nos-Diap1 double mutant fed flies had 32% PN which was not significantly different from that of the single mutant Atg1 GLC, which had 31% (p>.05). In the single mutant nos-Diap1, the numbers of egg chambers having PN in either fed flies or starved flies was low, yet significantly higher than the control (p<.001).
The persisting nuclei phenotype of Atg1 GLC has previously been reported by us and others [7]–[8]. In contrast to our results, Nezis et al. (2010) found 62% persisting nurse cell nuclei in Atg1 GLCs. One possibility for the difference in our findings is that the GLC protocols differed slightly in the length of heat shock used to induce GLCs. While our protocol specifies two 1 hour heat shocks, the Nezis group heat shocked twice for 1.5 hours [8]. This 50 % increase in heat shock time might account for the stronger observed phenotype, perhaps because of increased frequency of follicle cell clones (FCCs). Indeed, we found that increasing the length of heat shock from 2 to 4 hours significantly increased the number of egg chambers having FCCs (p<.01) as well as the size of the clones (Fig. S3). Barth et al. analyzed Atg1 mutants using pole cell transplantation and X-ray induction of recombination to make GLCs and concluded that late stage egg chambers from GLC were normal except for a very low level of PN (4%) and a delay in development of the progeny [21].
To reiterate, the number of nuclei persisting in each egg chamber was 3 or fewer in all mutant genotypes and controls. Thus even using Atg1, a mutant with stronger effects than Atg7 [18], we have not found a large number of PN in late stage egg chambers, even when combined with caspase inhibition.
Atg1 Follicle Cell Clones Show the Same Frequency of Persisting Nurse Cell Nuclei as Control Siblings
To determine whether autophagy has a role in the follicle cells contributing to the death and disappearance of the nurse cells, follicle cell clones of Atg1 (Atg1 FCC) were produced. To avoid the uncertainty of using the heat shock system (possibly inducing GLCs as well as FCCs) we used the UAS-GAL4 system to restrict the clones to follicle cells. e22c-GAL4, which expresses in follicle cell stem cells [22], was used with UAS-FLP to induce recombinant clones of Atg1. Mutant clones were visualized by their lack of ubi-GFP, carried on the homologous chromosome. The expression of GFP, although strong in mid-stages, was weak in late stages. This presented an obstacle to determining whether a given late stage egg chamber contained mutant follicle cells for the purpose of quantifying the occurrence of PN associated with FCCs. However, we determined that in stage 10, over 94.7% of egg chambers (n = 452) produced under the same conditions were mosaic for GFP/Atg1 clones. Assuming a similar high frequency of clones in late stage egg chambers, we counted persisting nuclei in all egg chambers from e22c-GAL4 UAS-flp; Atg1 FRT/ ubi-GFP FRT flies and compared them to controls. The number of PN in stage 14 egg chambers of Atg1 FCC flies was found to be similar to controls and never had more than 1–3 nuclei persisting per egg chamber ( Table 1 ).
To determine more precisely whether the loss of Atg1 from follicle cells was correlated with PN, we closely examined the phenotypes of egg chambers with FCC using confocal microscopy. Fig. 3A shows a stage 13 egg chamber where several of the follicle cells are Atg1− (GFP−), however the condensation of underlying nurse cell nuclei is normal and staining with LysoTracker appears the same as controls (compare with Fig. 1B ′). To confirm that autophagy was disrupted in these FCCs, we examined egg chambers labeled with an antibody against Ref(2)P, a marker that indicates an inhibition of autophagy [23] ( Figs. 3B–3F ). The mid-stage egg chamber in Fig. 3B illustrates the inverse relationship between Atg1 function and Ref(2)P staining. In Figs. 3C–D , the Ref(2)P staining in follicle cells adjacent to a single condensed nurse cell nucleus in a stage 13 egg chamber shows that although autophagy was inhibited, nurse cell death proceeded normally. Figs. 3E–F show another stage 13 egg chamber where lack of GFP ( Fig. 3E ′′) and bright Ref(2)P staining ( Fig. 3E ′) show a mutant clone involving at least 5 follicle cells. In this egg chamber all of the nurse cell nuclei have been completely removed. Our data and observations indicate that the autophagic process in follicle cells does not play a major role in nurse cell removal in late oogenesis.
deep orange Hybrids Show a much Greater Frequency of Persisting Nurse Cell Nuclei than Autophagy and Caspase Double Mutants
We have previously reported a strong PN phenotype for mutants of deep orange [7] (Fig. S1E) which encodes a lysosomal trafficking protein, Vps18 [24]. To give a perspective on the occurrence of PN in the PCD mutants described above, we compared our results with data obtained from deep orange mutants. As shown in Fig. 4 , when compared to apoptosis and autophagy double mutants, the dor4/dor8 hybrids had a distinctly different pattern of PN, with not only a higher frequency of PN, but also many more PN per egg chamber. Significantly higher frequencies of PN were obtained for Atg1GLC nos-Diap1 flies (p<.005) and for dor4/dor8 hybrids (p<.005) when compared to controls. Atg7 nos-Diap1 flies had a PN frequency that was significantly lower than controls (p<.05) and Atg7 Dcp-1 flies had a PN frequency that was not significantly different from controls (p<.05) . Finally, when compared to Atg1 GLC nos-Diap1 flies, dor4/dor8 hybrids had a significantly higher frequency of PN (p<.001).
If the actual percentage of nurse cell nuclei persisting out of 15 nurse cell nuclei per egg chamber is calculated, the numbers for most mutants are quite low. As shown in Fig. S4, controls had < 2% of their nuclei persisting, Atg1 GLC nos-Diap1 had only 6.5% persisting nuclei and the dor4/dor8 mutants had 63.8% of their nurse cell nuclei persisting. To summarize, the levels of PN observed in the caspase and autophagy mutants were far lower than the levels shown in deep orange mutants. However all mutants studied here, including deep orange, were unable to prevent 100% of their 15 nurse cell nuclei from dying.
Discussion
The late stage oogenesis phenotypes observed in autophagy and apoptosis mutants were mild with respect to persisting nurse cell nuclei. Disrupting both autophagy and apoptosis genes at the same time did not show enhanced defects in the death and removal of the nurse cell nuclei from stage 14 egg chambers. The percent of stage 14 egg chambers containing 1–3 or 4–6 persisting nurse cell nuclei was well under 50% for all mutant genotypes, including double mutants. If apoptosis and autophagy were working redundantly to remove nurse cells we would expect to see a synergistic effect with a large increase both in the number of egg chambers containing PN as well as an increase in the number of PN per egg chamber. Since this was not the case we conclude that there is another form of cell death working to remove nurse cells.
Other research groups have observed different numbers of PN in Atg1 mutants. While we found in the range of 30% PN in GLC (this study and [7]), Nezis et al. (2010) found that over 60% of stage 14 egg chambers from their GLCs contained PN, although more than half of these contained between 1 and 5 nuclei [8]. If the calculation is made, even if 100% of egg chambers had 5 persisting nurse cell nuclei, this represents only 33.3% of the total nuclei contained in egg chambers, and the remainder, 66.7%, would have died and disappeared. It is unclear why these workers found a higher frequency of PN than we did. Possible reasons include subtle differences in genetic background since the GLCs were made with different Atg1 Δ3D recombinants, different criteria for scoring egg chambers as stage 14, or effects due to a longer heat shock protocol. In contrast to these data, Barth et al. reported finding only 3.7 % of egg chambers with PN from Atg1 GLC females, although in their experiments GLCs were made by pole cell transplantation rather than the FLP-FRT system [12], [21]. Also, these same workers found 57.2% PN in follicle cell clones when e22c-Gal4 was used to generate the clones [12]. Using the same protocol we found only 13.9 to 29.2% PN depending on whether the flies were starved or fed. These differences in PN frequency in FCC might also be due to differences in scoring stage 14 and our consistently low numbers could indicate that our classification of egg chambers into stages identifies egg chambers in the latest part of stage 14.
While it is possible that over-expression of Diap-1 in egg chambers does not inhibit all caspases that could contribute to apoptosis, we have shown previously that when both p35 and Diap-1 are over-expressed, the PN phenotype in stage 14 egg chambers is similarly mild [13].
The Drosophila salivary gland is a prominent model of autophagic cell death, and it has been shown that autophagy and caspases function in parallel to remove the salivary gland during developmental PCD [14]. We expected the same mechanism would be at work in nurse cells, however this was not the case. We saw no increase in the frequency of PN when both autophagy and apoptosis were inhibited, indicating that they function in the same pathway. Indeed, it has been shown that caspase activity in nurse cells is inhibited in autophagy mutants [8], suggesting that autophagy acts upstream of caspase activation during developmental nurse cell death. However, we find that the autophagy-caspase pathway contributes only in a minor way to nurse cell death.
The strong phenotype observed in deep orange mutants and the unusual acidification of nurse cells are an indication that lysosomes play a prominent role in nurse cell death or removal. There may be a cell-autonomous pathway acting in nurse cells, involving a lysosomal or necrotic pathway. Alternatively, the surrounding follicle cells may participate in the death or clearance of the nurse cells. Recently we have found that deep orange GLCs have a much milder phenotype than homozygotes (A. Timmons and KM, unpublished), indicating that there is a non-cell-autonomous requirement for deep orange. In dying mid-stage egg chambers, the surrounding follicle cells are known to engulf nurse cell remnants [3], [25], but it is unclear if they contribute to the death of the nurse cells or whether they have similar functions in late oogenesis.
While much has been learned about mechanisms of apoptosis, other forms of cell death are less well-understood. The vast majority of information on so-called alternative pathways comes from cell culture models, and there are very few in vivo models of non-apoptotic cell death. In C. elegans, necrotic cell death occurs in neurons with mutations in ion channels [26], [27], and a naturally occurring non-apoptotic cell death has been described for the linker cell [28], [29]. In Drosophila, non-apoptotic cell deaths have been described in the salivary gland [12], the midgut [30], the germline [31], and in some models of neurodegeneration [32]. In addition to cell intrinsic mechanisms, phagocytic cells can actively contribute to cell death (“phagoptosis”) [33]. This was first shown in C. elegans [34], but has also been shown in Drosophila [35] and mammalian systems [36]–[38]. Two recent reports demonstrate that viable neurons can be killed by phagocytic microglia that have been activated by the addition of amyloid beta peptide or LPS [36]–[37]. Phagoptosis of blood cells is arguably the most common physiological form of cell death in mammals, but phagoptosis is under-studied due to the absence of phagocytes in cell culture and limited model systems [33]. Further studies in the Drosophila ovary will reveal whether atypical autonomous or non-autonomous mechanisms actively contribute to nurse cell death.
Materials and Methods
Drosophila Strains and Manipulations
The Atg7d77, Atg7d14, and Atg1 Δ3D alleles were obtained from Tom Neufeld, nanos-GAL4-VP16 was obtained from Pernille Rorth, T(2∶3)apXa/CyO; TM2 was from Welcome Bender, Dcp-1Prev-1 [17] and UASp-Diap-1 [6] were generated in our lab, and UAS-FLP, hs-FLP, ubi-GFPnls, ovoD1 FRT 79D-F, e22c-GAL4, dor4 and dor8 were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center. To facilitate production of the experimental genotypes the following recombinant stocks were made: yw; Atg7d77 Dcp-1Prev-1/ CyO y+, yw; Atg7d14 Dcp-1Prev-1/ CyO y+, hs-FLP; Atg1 Δ3D FRT 79D-F nanos-GAL4/TM3, hsflp; CyO UASp-Diap1/+; D/TM3, and UASp-Diap1; T(2∶3)apXa/CyO; TM2 . Before making crosses to produce the experimental animals the veracity of these recombinant stocks was tested using complementation against deficiencies, or examined for specific known phenotypes. For example, stocks assumed to carry UASp-Diap1 were crossed to nanos-GAL4 and the dying mid-stage egg chambers of the F1 females were examined for the known phenotype [6]. Specific genotypes of experimental flies (and simplified notation used in the text): w; Dcp-1Prev-1 (Dcp-1), Atg7d14/Atg7d77 (Atg7), Atg7d14 Dcp-1Prev-1 /Atg7d77 Dcp-1Prev-1 (Atg7 Dcp-1), Atg7d14/CyO or Atg7d77/CyO (CyO control), UASp- Diap1/+; nanos-GAL4/+ (nos-Diap1), UASp-Diap1/ +; Atg7d77/Atg7d14; nanos-Gal4/ + (Atg7 nos-Diap1), hs-flp/+; +/+; Atg1 FRT 79D-F nanos-GAL4/ ovoD1 FRT 79D-F (Atg1 GLC), hs-flp/+; CyO UASp-Diap1/+; Atg1 FRT 79D-F nanos-GAL4/ ovoD1 FRT 79D-F (Atg1 GLC nos-Diap1), hsflp/+; CyO UASp-Diap1/+; Atg1 FRT 79D-F nanos-GAL4/ TM3 (nos-Diap1), hsflp/+; +/+; Atg1 FRT 79D-F nanos-GAL4/ TM3 (Control), e22c-GAL4 UAS-flp/+; Atg1 FRT 79D-F/ ubi-GFPnls FRT 79D-F (Atg1 FCC), CyO/+; Atg1 FRT 79D-F/ ubi-GFPnls FRT 79 D–F (Control).
Dissection and Staining
Flies were raised on cornmeal-molasses food supplemented with wet yeast paste for the “fed” treatment. For starvation, flies were transferred into vials containing apple juice agar lacking yeast for 1 day before dissection. For heat shocking, larvae were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour on days 4 and 5 after egg laying unless otherwise specified.
Ovaries were dissected in Drosophila Ringers solution (130 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.9 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM HEPES, pH 6.9), rinsed in PBS (130 mM NaCl, 7 mM Na2HPO4, 3 mM NaH2PO4), fixed for 10 minutes with 2.5% paraformaldehyde in PBS for LysoTracker staining or 6% formaldehyde in PIPES buffer (100 mM PIPES, 2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM EGTA, pH 6.9) for antibody staining, washed in PBS containing 0.1% Triton-X (PBT). For antibody staining, fixed egg chambers were washed 5 times in PBT, blocked in PBT containing 1.5% Bovine Serine Albumin (PBTB) for 1 hour and incubated in antibody diluted in PBTB overnight at 4°C. The egg chambers were then washed 5 times with PBT and blocked again in PBT containing 1% normal goat serum (PBTG) for 1 hour and incubated in secondary antibody diluted 1∶200 in PBTG for 2 hours at room temperature. The egg chambers were then rinsed in PBT and mounted in Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Labs). For anti-GFP staining, rabbit anti-GFP (Invitrogen #A11122) was diluted 1∶200 in PBTB and the secondary antibody was goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa-488 (Molecular Probes #A11008). For Ref(2)P staining, rat anti-Ref(2)P antibody (a gift from Ioannis Nezis) was diluted 1∶1000 in PBTB, and the secondary antibody was goat anti-rat conjugated to Cy-3 (Jackson Labs #112-165-003). For Diap1 staining, mouse anti-Diap1 antibody (a gift from Bruce Hay) was diluted 1∶200 in PBTB, and the secondary antibody was goat anti-mouse conjugated to Cy-3 (Jackson Labs). For LysoTracker staining, ovaries were dissected in PBS and the unfixed tissue was incubated in a 50µM solution of LysoTracker (Invitrogen #L7528) and PBS for 3 minutes. After rinsing with PBS, the tissues were fixed as described above before mounting in Vectashield with DAPI. The stained tissues were examined with an Olympus FluoView FV10i confocal laser microscope. DAPI stained egg chambers were classified according to King [2] and determined to be in stage 14 when the dorsal appendages appeared opaque and robust. Images were processed with the Olympus FluoView FV10-ASW viewer and figures were made using Adobe Photoshop.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank T. Neufeld, P. Rorth and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for fly strains, Ioannis Nezis for the Ref(2)P antibody, Bruce Hay for the Diap1 antibody, members of the lab for helpful comments on the manuscript, and Patrick Peterson for help with statistical analysis.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by NIH R01 GM060574. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Spradling AC (1993) Developmental genetics of oogenesis. In: Bate M, Martinez Arias A, editors. The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1–70.
- 2.King RC (1970) Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster. New York: Academic Press.
- 3. Giorgi F, Deri P (1976) Cell death in ovarian chambers of Drosophila melanogaster . J Embryol Exp Morph 35: 521–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Peterson J, Bass BP, Jue D, Rodrigues A, Abrams JM, et al. (2007) Non-canonical cell death pathways function in Drosophila oogenesis. Genesis 45: 396–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Varkey J, Chen P, Jemmerson R, Abrams JM (1999) Altered Cytochrome c display precedes apoptotic cell death in Drosophila . J Cell Biol 144: 701–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Peterson JS, Barkett M, McCall K (2003) Stage-specific regulation of caspase activity in Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol 260: 113–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bass BP, Tanner EA, Mateos San Martin D, Blute T, Kinser RD, et al. (2009) Cell-autonomous requirement for DNAseII in nonaptotic cell death. Cell Death Differ 16 (10): 1362–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nezis IP, Shravage BV, Sagona AP, Lamark T, Bjorkoy G, et al. (2010) Autophagic degradation of dBruce controls DNA fragmentation in nurse cells during late Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. J Cell Biol 190: 523–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Foley K, Cooley L (1998) Apoptosis in late stage Drosophila nurse cells does not require genes within the H99 deficiency. Development 125: 1075–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. McCall K, Steller H (1998) Requirement for DCP-1 caspase during Drosophila oogenesis. Science 279: 230–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cavaliere V, Taddei C, Gargiulo G (1998) Apoptosis of nurse cells at the late stages of oogenesis. Dev Genes Evol 208: 106–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Barth JM, Hafen E, Kohler K (2012) The lack of autophagy triggers precocious activation of Notch signaling during Drosophila oogenesis. BMC Dev Biol 12: 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Baum JS, Arama E, Steller H, McCall K (2007) The Drosophila caspases Strica and Dronc function redundantly in programmed cell death during oogenesis. Cell Death Differ 14: 1508–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Berry DL, Baehrecke EH (2007) Growth arrest and autophagy are required for salivary gland cell degradation in Drosophila . Cell 131: 1137–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Juhasz G, Erdi B, Sass M, Neufeld TP (2007) Atg7-dependent autophagy promotes neuronal health, stress tolerance and longevity but is dispensable for metamorphosis in Drosophila . Genes Dev 21: 3061–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Melendez A, Neufeld TP (2008) The cell biology of autophagy in metazoans: a developing story. Development 135: 2347–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Laundrie B, Peterson JS, Baum JS, Chang JC, Fileppo D, et al. (2003) Germline cell death in inhibited by P element insertions in the dcp-1/pita nested gene pair in Drosophila . Genetics 165: 1881–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Scott R, Juhasz G, Neufeld TP (2007) Direct induction of autophagy by Atg1 inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic cell death. Curr Biol 17: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Scott R, Schuldiner O, Neufeld TP (2004) Role and regulation of starvation-induced autophagy in the Drosophila fat body. Dev Cell 7: 167–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chou TB, Perrimon N (1996) The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster . Genetics 144: 1673–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Barth J, Szabad J, Hafen E, Kohler K (2010) Autophagy in Drosophila ovaries is induced by starvation and is required for oogenesis. Cell Death Differ 18: 915–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Duffy JB, Harrison DA, Perrimon N (1998) Identifying loci required for follicular patterning using directed mosaics. Development 125: 2263–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bartlett B, Isakson P, Lewerenz J, Sanchez H, Kotzebue RW, et al. (2011) p62, Ref(2)P and ubiquitinated proteins are conserved markers of aging, aggregate formation and progressive autophagic defects. Autophagy 7: 572–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lindmo K, Simonsen A, Brech A, Rusten TE, Stenmark H (2006) A dual function for Deep orange in programmed autophagy in the Drosophila melanogaster fat body. Exp Cell Res 312: 2018–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Etchegaray J, Timmons AK, Klein AP, Pritchett TL, Welch E, et al. (2012) Draper acts through the JNK pathway to control synchronous engulfment of dying germline cells by follicular epithelial cells. Development 139: 4029–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Berger AJ, Hart AC, Kaplan JM (1998) Gas-induced neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. . J Neurosci 18: 2871–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hall DH, Gu G, Garcia-Anoveros J, Gong L, Chalfie M, et al. (1997) Neuropathology of degenerative cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. . J Neurosci 17: 1033–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Abraham MC, Lu Y, Shaham SA (2007) Morphologically conserved nonapoptotic program promotes linker cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. . Dev Cell 12: 73–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Blum ES, Abraham MC, Yoshimura S, Lu Y, Shaham S (2012) Control of nonapoptotic developmental cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans by a polyglutamine-repeat protein. Science 335: 970–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Denton D, Shravage B, Simin R, Mills K, Berry DL, et al. (2009) Autophagy, not apoptosis, is essential for midgut cell death in Drosophila. . Curr Biol 19: 1741–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pritchett TL, Tanner EA, McCall K (2009) Cracking open cell death in the Drosophila ovary. Apoptosis 14: 969–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McCall K (2010) Genetic control of necrosis - another type of programmed cell death. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22: 882–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Brown GC, Neher JJ (2012) Eaten alive! Cell death by primary phagocytosis: ‘phagoptosis’. Trends Biochem Sci 37: 325–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Reddien PW, Cameron S, Horvitz HR (2001) Phagocytosis promotes programmed cell death in C. elegans . Nature 412: 198–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Li W, Baker NE (2007) Engulfment is required for cell competition. Cell 129: 1215–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Neher JJ, Neniskyte U, Zhao JW, Bal-Price A, Tolkovsky AM, et al. (2011) Inhibition of microglial phagocytosis is sufficient to prevent inflammatory neuronal death. J Immunol 186: 4973–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Neniskyte U, Neher JJ, Brown GC (2011) Neuronal death induced by nanomolar amyloid beta is mediated by primary phagocytosis of neurons by microglia. J Biol Chem 286: 39904–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Overholtzer M, Mailleux AA, Mouneimme G, Normand G, Schnitt SJ, et al. (2007) A nonaptotic cell death process, entosis, that occurs by cell-in-cell invasion. Cell 131: 966–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.