Abstract
Ryanodine receptor (RyR) Ca2+ release channel is the target of diamide insecticides, which show selective insecticidal activity against lepidopterous insects. To study the molecular mechanisms underlying the species-specific action of diamide insecticides, we have cloned and characterized the entire cDNA sequence of RyR from Ostrinia furnacalis (named as OfRyR). The OfRyR mRNA has an Open Reading Frame of 15324 bp nucleotides and encodes a 5108 amino acid polypeptide that displays 79–97% identity with other insects RyR proteins and shows the greatest identity with Cnaphalocrocis medinalis RyR (97%). Quantitative real-time PCR showed that the OfRyR was expressed at the lowest level in egg and the highest level in adult. The relative expression level of OfRyR in first, third and fifth-instar larva were 1.28, 1.19 and 1.99 times of that in egg. Moreover, two alternative splicing sites were identified in the OfRyR gene. One pair of mutually exclusive exons (a/b) were present in the central part of the predicted SPRY domain, and an optional exon (c) was located between the third and fourth RyR domains. Diagnostic PCR demonstrated that exons a and b existed in all developmental stages of OfRyR cDNA, but exon c was not detected in the egg cDNA. And the usage frequencies of these exons showed a significant difference between different developmental stages. These results provided the crucial basis for the functional expression of OfRyR and for the discovery of compound with potentially selective insect activtity.
Introduction
Ryanodine receptors (RyRs) are members of a superfamily of intracellular Ca2+ channels. These channels regulate the release of calcium from the lumen of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol of muscle and non-muscle cells [1]–[2]. The RyRs are homomeric tetramers with a total molecular mass of 2 to 2.5 MDa, and each contains about 5000 amino acids with a large hydrophilic N-terminal domain and a small membrane-spanning C-terminal domain. The large N-terminal cytoplasmic domain termed “foot structure” spans the junction gap between the transverse tubules and sarcoplasmic reticulum membranes, while the hydrophobic C-terminal domain, which was predicted to contain 4–12 transmembrane segments, forms the putative pore of the Ca2+ release channel [3]–[4]. It has been proposed that the specific interaction between the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains is an important mechanism in the intrinsic modulation of the RyR [5].
To date, three types of ryanodine receptor (RyR1, RyR2 and RyR3) have been identified in mammals. RyR1 and RyR2 are abundant in skeletal and cardiac muscles. RyR3 is ubiquitously expressed throughout different tissues but is relatively abundant in brain and certain skeletal tissues [6]–[8]. There is approximately 66% amino acid sequence homology among the three mammalian RyR isoforms, except for three regions with high degrees of variability [9]. Two isoforms (RyRA and RyRB) were found in fish, amphibians and birds [10]–[11]. These two isoforms showed homology with mammals RyR1 and RyR3. However, only one RyR gene was found in Drosophila melanogaster (DmRyR) [12], and DmRyR shared 45–47% amino acid identity with three mammalian RyR isoforms [13]. The regions with a high degree of structural divergence between the mammalian and insect isoforms of the RyR may serve as potential targets for insecticides that interact specifically with the insect but not mammalian isoforms [9].
The Ca2+-release channel properties of RyR have been studied with increasing interest in the last 30 years in the medical field. Recently, insect RyRs attracted researchers' great attention in the pesticide field. Because, insect RyRs were found to be the targets of two classes of diamides chemicals: the phthalic diamides such as flubendiamide [14]–[17], and the anthranilic diamides such as chloranthraniliprole [18]–[20]. The diamides insecticides activate the ryanodine-sensitive intracellular calcium release channels in insects and show good selectivity for insect RyRs compared to mammalian RyRs by evoking typical symptoms including poisoning, body contraction, feeding cessation, paralysis and subsequent mortality [21]. It was reported that flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole caused release of intracellular Ca2+ in isolated Heliothis virescens and Periplaneta americana neurons [15], [16], [20]. Meanwhile, binding studies on microsomal membranes from Heliothis virescens and Periplaneta americana muscles showed that diamides interact with a site different from the ryanodine binding site on the insect RyR complex. The binding site for ryanodine is located on the C-terminal portion of RyR, within or close to the pore region of the Ca2+ release channel [16], [20]. However, the exact binding sites for flubendiamide or chlorantraniliprole have not yet been identified.
With the wide use of diamide insecticides in the world, many studies were conducted on insect RyRs. The cDNAs encoding lepidopterous RyRs are cloned from silkworm, Bombyx mori (BmRyR), diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (PxRyR), beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (SeRyR), striped rice borer, Chilo suppressalis (CsRyR), and rice leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (CmRyR), respectively [22]–[23]. Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée), is one of main maize pest insects. It was reported that diamide insecticides showed high bioefficacy against this pest insect [24]. This study aims to elucidate the structural features, developmental expression pattern and alternative splicing of OfRyR gene in Asian corn borers.
Materials and Methods
Insects and RNA preparation
Asian corn borer larvae were obtained from the stalk of field corn at the Hengshui experimental field of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hebei Province, China. Colonies have been maintained on an agar-free semi-artificial diet in the laboratory for several generations. Total RNA was isolated from Asian corn borer using an RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions.
OfRyR cDNA cloning
Complementary DNA was transcribed from total RNA (1 µL) of third instar larvae following the manufacturer's protocol (Primescript™ First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit; Takara, Dalian, China). The strategy used for PCR cloning is shown in Figure 1. Several primer sets based collectively on conserved sequences from bombyx mori, Spodoptera exigua, plutella xylostella, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Heliothis virescens, Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila Melanogaster RyR mRNAs were synthesized (BGI, Beijing, China), and employed for PCR amplification (Table 1). The thermal cycling for the PCR reaction was: initial denaturing at 94°C for 5 min, 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 50–65°C (depending on the Tm of primers) for 30 s and 72°C for 1–3 min (determined by the length of the amplified fragments), and an additional polymerisation step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels, and the expected DNA fragments were subcloned into pMD19-T Simple Vector (Takara, Dalian, China). The nucleotide sequences of the generated clones were determined at the BGI (Beijing, China), and compared with those of other RyR mRNA sequences previously reported in GenBank.
Table 1. Primers used in cloning OfRyR cDNA.
Fragment name | Primer name | cDNA position | Primer sequence (5′-3′) |
S1 | F1 | 1–769 | ATGGCBGANRSNGAGGGNRGNKC |
R1 | CGGAACCGCCTTCGTAGACT | ||
S2 | F2 | 586–1409 | TTYCAYGTRACNCAYTGGTC |
R2 | TGYTTYTCYTCGTGYTCCAT | ||
S3 | F3 | 1237–2687 | AAGTGTTCCTCGTTGTTC |
R3 | ATYTTRTTYATWGCCCACAT | ||
S4 | F4 | 2663–4359 | ACGAAATGTGGGCAATGAAC |
R4 | AGACTTGCGGGACTTTGC | ||
S5 | F5 | 4224–5449 | AGCCGAGATGTCTAAATACG |
R5 | TGAGCAGGTCGTAGAAGC | ||
S6 | F6 | 5104–6149 | MRDCCRCAYCARTGGGCTAG |
R6 | TCHCKVGGHGGACANCGGAA | ||
S7 | F7 | 6074–6902 | CAGAAATCAAGCAGTCGG |
R7 | CGRCARCARGCYACVACCAT | ||
S8 | F8 | 6779–8160 | CAGTGATGATGAACACGCTA |
R8 | GAGGGTTAGCAGCCTTAGAG | ||
S9 | F9 | 8020–8885 | CGHGARGCKGTBTCMGACTT |
R9 | CKYTCVGCCATRTTYTGCAT | ||
S10 | F10 | 8802–9620 | AGCGACTCCGTTCAACTACA |
R10 | GCGTATTTACCCTCTTGC | ||
S11 | F11 | 9568–10731 | GTTGCTGATGATTTGGGACA |
R11 | AACTGTTGTCACCCGTCT | ||
S12 | F12 | 10513–11793 | TACCCGCTGCTAATCAAG |
R12 | GATGTCAATGTTGCCTCCTC | ||
S13 | F13 | 11614–12452 | ATMCAYGARCAAGARATGGA |
R13 | CCRTTDACRACRTTYCCTTC | ||
S14 | F14 | 12031–13252 | GAATGGCAGAACTACCTCA |
R14 | GCGATAAGGACGAGAATG | ||
S15 | F15 | 13055–14258 | ARGAYGCHATHTTTGARATG |
R15 | ATYTCYTTYTCNCGYTTGAA | ||
S16 | F16 | 14118–14837 | GCACATAGACGAGGATTTC |
R16 | CAGTTCTTGTTGACCTCGT | ||
S17 | F17 | 14374–15089 | TGGGACAARTTYGYRAAGAA |
R17 | ATRAARCARTTGGAYTCCATGT |
Note: R = A/G, Y = C/T, M = A/C, K = G/T, S = C/G, W = A/T, H = A/C/T, B = C/G/T, V = A/C/G, D = A/G/T, N = A/C/G/T. These primers were synthetized by BGI (Beijing, China).
Sequence analysis
The nucleotide sequences of the full-length OfRyR cDNA was determined by all of the overlapping cDNA clones. The molecular weight, protein length and pI were predicted using DNAMAN v.7.0 (Lynnon Corporation). The sequence alignment was performed using CLUSTALW with the default settings, and the aligned sequences were used to construct the phylogenetic tree in MEGA5. The conserved sequence was analysed using Conserved Domains (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi). The transmembrane (TM) segments were predicted from the secondary structure of the deduced amino acid sequence (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM). The hydropathy profile of the consensus amino acid sequence of OfRyR was analysed using the website (http://web.expasy.org/cgi- bin/protscale/ protscale.pl.).
qRT-PCR analysis of OfRyR expression
The relative expression levels of OfRyR mRNA in different developmental stages were examined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Complementary DNA was synthesized with equal amount of total RNA (1 ug) from eggs, first-instar larvae, third-instar larvae, fifth-instar larvae, pupae and adults according to the instructions of the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (Takara, Dalian, China). The housekeeping gene β-actin from O. furnacalis was utilized as a reference to normalize the amount of transcript. Primers (Table 2) for OfRyR and Ofβ-actin gene were designed to generate products located in the conserved domain without deletion sites. Each 20 µL PCR master mix contained 2 µL diluted cDNA template, 10 µL SYBR Premix Ex Taq™, 0.4 µL forward primer (10 uM), 0.4 µL reverse primer (10 uM), 0.4 µL Rox Reference Dye II(50×) and 6.8 µL RNase free H2O, which follows the instructions of the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Perfect Real Time) (Takara, Dalian, China). Thermal cycling was completed on a 7500 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using the program of 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 34 s. After the cycling protocol, a melting curve analysis from 60°C to 95°C was applied to all reactions to verify a single PCR product. The qPCR amplifications were carried out in 96-well plates. Four biological replicates were examined. The amplification efficiency of the target gene and housekeeping gene were estimated by using E = (10−1/slope)−1, where the slope was derived from the plot of the cycle threshold (Ct) value versus the log of the serially diluted template concentration. Quantification of transcript level of OfRyR gene was conducted according the 2−ΔΔCt method [25]. The OfRyR expression data were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed by Duncan's Multiple Range Test for significance (P<0.05) by using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Table 2. Primers used for qRT-PCR.
Gene | Sense primer (5′-3′) | Anti-sense primer (5′-3′) | Length (bp) |
OfRyR | GGCGGACCGAAGAATAGGGA | CGACGGCGATAAGGACGAGA | 141 |
Ofβ-actin | ACGGCATCATCACCAACT | GGGTCATCTTTTCCCTGTT | 144 |
Diagnostic PCR analyses for the detection of alternative exons
Diagnostic PCR was conducted to detect the putative alternative exon in the individual cDNA clones. The names and nucleotide sequences of the primers used in the diagnostic PCR reactions were listed in Table 3. Firstly, segments containing the alternative exons were amplified by primers flanking the alternative exon region. The PCR products were cloned into pMD19-T vector (Takara, Dalian, China) and cultured overnight at 4°C. Then the recombinant plasmid was transformed into the DH5a competent cells and grew in the solid LB culture medium with ampicillin, IPTG and X-Gal. The positive clones were selected and used as templates for diagnostic PCR. Mutually exclusive exons were identified using two exon-specific primer sets. Optional exons were identified using a primer spanning the exon and flanking region or a primer spanning the flanking region excluding the exon sequence. These exon-specific primers were used to generate unique PCR products representing the presence or absence of alternative exon in each clone. The PCR products were examined by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under the UV transilluminator. Representative clones exhibiting unique bands were sequenced to confirm the reliability of the diagnostic PCR assay. Data were collected from 20–35 clones for each segment and developmental stage and three cDNA templates of each developmental stage were tested as replications.
Table 3. Primers used in diagnostic PCR.
Description | Primer name | Primer sequence (5′-3′) |
Diagnostic PCR for exon a | OF1 | CAGCTCTGGAAAGTGGTA |
OR1 | AAAGACTCTGTGCTACCG | |
Diagnostic PCR for exon b | OF2 | GATGCTTCCTGGATGTTT |
OR2 | AACGTCTTGTCCGTATGT | |
Diagnostic PCR for the absence of exon c | OF3 | TGGTGGTCCCGACAATCCT |
OR3 | GTCCGTGCCTCCAGACTTTG | |
Diagnostic PCR for the presence of exon c | OF4 | TGGTGGTCCCGACAATCCT |
OR4 | TCACTATGTCTGGCGGGCGG |
Results
Cloning and analysis of OfRyR cDNA
Totally, nineteen overlapping cDNA clones of O. furnacalis were amplified, and they were spliced together to make a full-length cDNA (GenBank accession number KC355370). This cDNA contains a 15327 bp open reading frame (ORF) sequence. The ORF encodes a protein of 5108 amino acid residues with molecular weight of 577.4 kDa, and the predicted isoelectric point was 5.35.
The amino acid sequences alignment showed that the identities of OfRyR with CmRyR, CsRyR, SeRyR, PxRyR, BmRyR and DmRyR were 97, 96, 95, 92, 95 and 79%, respectively. However, identities of OfRyR with H. sapiens RyR1–3 were only 51–60% (Table 4). To investigate the evolutionary relationships among RyR sequences, a phylogenetic analysis was performed using the ClustalW and MEGA 5.0 program based on the ORF amino acid sequence of eleven insects, one nematode and three mammalian RyRs (Fig 2). The results of phylogenetic analysis revealed that OfRyR is grouped with CmRyR, CsRyR, SeRyR, BmRyR and PxRyR. The phylogenetic tree showed that the RyRs of eleven insects formed a bigger cluster, and the three mammalian RyRs formed a smaller one. This two clusters were well segregated from each other, and also from the Caenorhabditis elegans RyR.
Table 4. Percentage of amino acid sequence identity between OfRyR and other RyR isoforms.
CmRyR | CsRyR | SeRyR | PxRyR | BmRyR | BtRyR | DmRyR | HsRyR1 | HsRyR2 | HsRyR3 | |
OfRyR | 97% | 96% | 95% | 92% | 95% | 80% | 79% | 60% | 52% | 51% |
The values correspond to the identical percentage of amino acids between the paired species. Cnaphalocrocis medinalis RyR (CmRyR), Chilo suppressalis RyR (CsRyR), Spodoptera exigua RyR (SeRyR), Plutella xylostella RyR (PxRyR), Bombyx mori RyR (BmRyR), Bemisia tabaci RyR (BtRyR), Drosophila mojavensis RyR (DmRyR) and Homo sapiens RyR (HsRyR)
Primary domains of OfRyR
Analyses of the amino acid sequence indicated the OfRyR contains six hydrophobic transmembrance domains (TM1–TM6) lying between amino acids 4445 and 5007 (Table 5, Fig 3). These six sequences are amino acids Phe4445-Leu4467, Asn4636-Tyr4658, Val4718-Leu4740, Phe4860-Ala4882, Leu4908-Phe4930 and Ile4988-Ile5007. The hydropathy profile analysis further revealed that the six transmembrance domains were corresponding to six highly hydrophobic regions (Fig 4). Besides, the other conserved domains (Fig 3) in the OfRyR are a MIR (protein Mannosyltransferase, IP3R and RyR) domain at positions 276–303, two RIH (RyR and IP3R Homology) Domain (residues 445–654 and 2208–2435), three SPRY (SPla and RyR) domain (residues 859–953, 1097–1218 and 1528–1669), four copies of RyR (RyR repeated) domain (residues 859–953, 972–1066, 2813–2906 and 2939–3027), a RIH-associated (RyR and IP3R Homology associated) domain (residues 3986–4109) and two EF-hand (residues 4191–4245 and 4203–4245) domain.
Table 5. Positions of possible transmembrane helices.
Number | Original position | Terminal position | Length | Orientation | Sequence |
TM1 | 4445 | 4467 | 23 | Outside-inside | FYLFYYLGYGGLVVVRYIFGVLL |
TM2 | 4636 | 4658 | 23 | Inside-outside | NFYNLKYVALVLAFCINFVLLFY |
TM3 | 4718 | 4740 | 23 | Outside-inside | VINMAAVLHSIVSLAILIGYYHL |
TM4 | 4860 | 4882 | 23 | Inside-outside | FLYSLWYFSFSVMGNFNNFFFAA |
TM5 | 4908 | 4930 | 23 | Outside-inside | LVLTVMLLTIIVYIYTVIAFNFF |
TM6 | 4988 | 5007 | 20 | Inside-outside | ISFFFFIIVILLAILQGLII |
Analysis of OfRyR amino acid sequence
Important modulator-binding sites were identified in OfRyR amino acid sequence (Fig S1) when compared to other reported RyRs including BmRyR, PxRyR, CmRyR, DmRyR, HvRyR (Heliothis virescens RyR) and OcRyR1 (Oryctolagus cuniculus RyR). A consensus sequence, Y[GAST][VG][KTQSN], for the putative adenine ring binding domain [26], was found in three sites (residues 1093–1096, 1145–1148 and 5073–5076) of OfRyR sequence. Three possible nucleotide binding sites, identified on the basis of the consensus GXGXXG motif [27], were located at positions 2734–2739, 3976–3981 and 4687–4691 in the OfRyR sequence. A potential binding site of calmodulin (CaM) in OfRyR was recognised in residues 3722–3751, corresponding to residues 3614–3643 in rabbit RyR1 sequence [28]. Two putative Ca2+-binding EF-hand motifs (residues 4186–4213 and 4221–4248), which interact with the cytoplasmic Ca2+ to regulate the ion channel were present in OfRyR. It has been shown that C-terminal region of RyR could form the functionally important domains. For example, the pore helix was predicted to be in the loop region between the fifth and sixth transmembrane helices (residues 4949–4963) [13]. Covering part of this sequence (residues 4960–4969), the sequence motif (GVRAGGGIGD), which has been shown to constitute pore-forming segments of the Ca2+ release channels was present in OfRyR [22]. All of these residues are also conserved in the OfRyR sequence as well as in other RyRs sequence. Moreover, a glutamate that is proposed to be involved in the Ca2+ sensitivity in rabbit RyR1 (E4032) [29] was conserved in OfRyR (E4145). Residues corresponding to I4897, R4913, and D4917 of rabbit RyR1, which play an important role in activity and conductance of the Ca2+ release channel [30], were also conserved in OfRyR (I4967, R4983, and D4987).
Expression of OfRyR mRNA in different developmental stages
The amplification efficiency (E) values of RyR and β-actin from O. furnacalis were calculated to be 0.925 and 0.963 respectively. Moreover, the relative expression level of OfRyR showed a significant difference between different developmental stages (Fig 5). It showed the lowest expression level in egg and the highest in adult, and the relative expression level in adult and pupae were 24.1 and 13.6 times when compared to that in egg. In addition, the expression level of OfRyR in first, third and fifth-instar larvae were 1.28, 1.19 and 1.99 times of that in egg.
Developmental regulation of alternative exon usage
Multiple sequences alignment revealed two putative alternative splicing sites (named alternative splicing 1 (AS1) and alternative splicing 2 (AS2)) existed in OfRyR. This two splicing sites form three alternative exons. Figure 6 showed the nucleotide and putative amino acid sequences of the three alternative exons. AS1 located between amino acid residues 1141–1173, which corresponding to the central part of the predicted second SPRY domain and forms one pair of mutually exclusive exons (a/b). AS2 located between the predicted third and fourth RyR domains (residues 2926–2931) and forms the optional exon c.
Diagnostic PCR was used to determine the usage of each alternative exon for OfRyR mRNA at different developmental stages including egg, first instar larva, third instar larva, fifth instar larva, pupae and adult. The usage frequencies of each putative alternative exon were summarized in Figure 7 and 8. The usage of the mutually exclusive exons (a/b) exhibited significantly developmental regulation. Exons a and b existed in all developmental stages of OfRyR cDNA clones but showed different level of usage frequency. In the first instar, third instar and fifth instar larva cDNA, the usage frequency of exon a was 97±0.1%, 95.2±2.6% and 89.8±2.8%. In egg cDNA, it amounted to 75.2±11.2%. But it was only 18.4±3.4% and 34.1±0.7% in pupae and adult cDNA. As for exon c, the highest frequency, 47.5±16.3%, was observed in the third instar larvae cDNA, and the relatively low frequency was found in the first instar larva, fifth instar larva, pupae and adult cDNA, which amounted to 13.6±10.1%, 9.6±5.7, 8.3±4.7% and 16.1±4.9%, respectively. However, exon c was not detected in egg cDNA.
Discussion
Although insect RyR has been used as target of insecticide for more than six decades [31], little research was conducted upon it until the emergency of diamides insecticides. These insecticides show highly insecticidal activity against lepidopteran insect pests but exhibit low mammalian toxicity. For this reason, insects RyRs have been studied with increasing interest in the pesticide field. Recently, XL Wang et al. reported a PxRyR that is composed of 5164 amino acids [22]. L Guo et al. cloned two PxRyR cDNA, PxRyR1 and PxRyR2 [31], they are respectively 47 and 91 amino acids shorter than the PxRyR cloned by Wang et al. And LN Sun et al. also reported a PxRyR showing 99% amino acids identity with Wang's RyR [23]. In addition, the CmRyR cDNA encoding 5087 amino acid residues was cloned by JJ Wang et al. [13]. In our study, we cloned and sequenced the full-length cDNA encoding OfRyR from third instar larva of O. furnacalis. The deduced 5108 amino acid residues of OfRyR shares a high degree of identity (92%–97%) with reported lepidopteran insect RyRs. But OfRyR shares only 48–60% identity with mammalian isoforms. The amino acid divergence between insect and mammalian RyR isoforms might be a reason why diamide insecticides show a high selectivity for insect RyRs compared to mammalian RyRs. Moreover, seven residues (N4922, N4924, N4935, L4950, L4981, N5013 and T5064), which are unique to lepidopteran RyR homologues have been found in CmRyR sequence [13]. The identical residues (N4943, N4945, N4956, L4971, L5002, N5034 and T5085) were also identified in OfRyR sequence. In contrast, different residues at the corresponding positions are shared by non-lepidopteran insect RyRs. And these residues are highly conserved in the non-lepidopteran insects, other invertebrate and vertebrate RyRs [13]. Interestingly, the residue N4956 in OfRyR just locate in the central part of the putative pore-helix motif, and the residue L5002 is present in the sixth transmembrance domain. These results indicated that these residues might be involved in the differences in Ca2+ release channel properties between lepidopteran and non-lepidopteran insects RyRs.
The diamide insecticides are potent activators of insect RyRs. It has been proved that the action of flubendiamide is highly specific, with selective toxicity in restricted insect taxa, including Lepidoptera [15]. For example, flubendiamide could induce release of Ca2+ through the BmRyR, but not through the rabbit RyR isoforms [9]. However, the binding sites of diamide insecticides are not clear. Binding studies on microsomal membranes from insect muscles suggest that flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole interact with a site distinct from the ryanodine binding site on the insect RyR complex [16], [20]. And flubendiamide is mainly incorporated into the transmembrane domain (amino acids 4111–5084) of the sRyR, while the N-terminal sequence (residues 183–290) is a structural requirement for flubendiamide-induced activation of the sRyR [9]. This segment of sRyR (residues 183–290) shares 94–99% identity with the equivalent region of other insects RyRs (OfRyR, CmRyR, SeRyR and PxRyR), but only 49% identity between sRyR and rabbit RyR1. This is possibly an important reason why diamide insecticides show high selectivity between pest insects and mammals.
Adenine nucleotides (including ATP, ADP, AMP, cAMP, adenosine, and adenine) are also activators of RyRs. Studies using photoreactive ATP analog Bz2ATP indicated the regulation of Ca2+ release by ATP involves an ATP binding site(s) located on the 27-kDa and 13-kDa fragments of the ryanodine receptor protein [22], [32]. The consensus sequence for an ATP-binding site, GXGXXG, occurs between three and six times in the RyR sequence. And there were three possible nucleotide binding sites, located at positions 2734–2739, 3976–3981 and 4687–4691 in the OfRyR sequence. In addition, OfRyR might be regulated by cytosolic Ca2+, similar to mammalian RyRs [33]. Because two conserved Ca2+-binding EF-hands were present in the C-terminus of the OfRyR. Ca2+ is the principal regulation mechanism for RyR in excitation-contraction coupling. And RyR was activated by micromolar concentrations of cytoplasmic Ca2+ [3], but millimolar Ca2+could inhibit RyR. This biphasic behavior may result from two classes of Ca2+ binding sites, a high-affinity activation site and a low affinity inactivation site. Another important regulator of OfRyR is the bifunctional protein calmodulin (CaM). The mammalian RyRs are regulated by CaM both in its Ca2+-free CaM (apo-CaM) and Ca2+-bound CaM (Ca2+-CaM) states [34]. When free Ca2+ is between 10−9 and 10−7 mol/L, apo-CaM activates RyR1 and RyR3 (but not RyR2), whereas the concentration of Ca2+ >10−5 mol/L, Ca2+-CaM inhibits all three RyR isoforms [35]. A potential binding site for both apo-CaM and Ca2+-CaM was identified in the OfRyR sequence (residues 3722–3751) [28]. So this region in OfRyR sequence might be the candidates for CaM binding and play a crucial role in the physiology process.
Real-time quantitative PCR indicated the expression level of OfRyR gene was quite different in the development stages. It showed high expression level in adult and pupae and the lowest in egg. However, Guo et al have reported that the expression levels of the PxRyR in different-instar larvae and adults were much higher than those of the prepupae and pupae in P. xylostella [31]. Therefore, we could deduce that the expression level of RyRs might vary in different insects.
Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA transcripts is a prevalent feature of gene processing and powerful mechanism to generate remarkable protein diversity from single gene [36]. And it plays an important role in physiology, disease and developmental stage-specific processes [37], [38]. Recently, many alternative splice variants of RyR isoforms have been identified in human, rabbit and mouse. For instance, alternative splicing of ASI residues (A3481–Q3485) contribute to an inhibitory module in RyR1 that influences excitation-contraction coupling [39]. And ASI residues is developmentally regulated: the residues are present in adult ASI(+)RyR1, but absent in the juvenile ASI(−)RyR1 which is over-expressed in adult myotonic dystrophy type 1 [1]. The 24-bp splice insertion of human RyR2, which is present at low level in embryonic and adult hearts can suppress intracellular Ca2+ fluxes that protects cells from caffeine-evoked apoptosis [36]. And a short isoform of spliced RyR3, which lacks a 29 amino acid fragment (H4406–K4434) containing a predicted transmembrane helix, is not a functional Ca2+ channel but inhibits the efficiency of the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release mechanism by a negative modulation of RyR2 in native smooth muscle cells [36].
Similarly, alternative splicing also exists in insects RyRs. It’s reported that the multiple mRNAs of D. melanogaster RyR can be generated by two different splicing patterns: (i) the mutually exclusive incorporation of exon into mRNA, and (ii) the choice of one out of two splice-acceptor sites [20]. The same splicing patterns were also identified in the C. medinalis and O. furnacalis RyR genes. In our study, two alternative splice variants (AS1 and AS2) showing developmental regulation were found in the OfRyR gene. AS1 (residues 1141–1173) located in the central of the second SPRY domain (SPRY2). The SPRY domain is a protein-protein interaction module and is implicated in important biological pathways, including regulate innate and adaptive immunity [40]. SPRY2 has been identified as an in vitro binding partner for N-terminal residues in the II–III loop of the skeletal muscle DHPR, as well as for the scorpion toxins imperatoxin A and maurocalcine. In addition, SPRY2 domain and its F loop (P1107-A1121) bind to the alternatively spliced residues and neighboring basic residues (ASI/basic) of RyR1 via an electrostatic interaction to regulate excitation contraction coupling. Mutation of the negatively charged amino acid of the SPRY2 F loop reduce SRRY2 domain binding to the ASI/basic region [41]. Since the mutually exclusive exons a and b are highly different in OfRyR, and exon b contains less negatively charged amino acids than exon a. Therefore, the OfRyR splice variants generated by mutually exclusive exons a and b might probably possess different function and binding effect. In our study, the splice variants showed significantly developmental regulation in OfRyR. This result implied that alternative splicing might play an important part in the temporal encoding of the Ca2+ release channel, and might involve in the differences in channel properties and function.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the editor Subba Reddy Palli and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB126106). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Berridge MJ (1993) Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signaling. Nature 361: 315–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Clapham DE (1995) Calcium signaling. Cell 80: 259–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bhat MB, Zhao J, Takeshima H, Ma J (1997) Functional calcium release channel formed by the carboxyl-terminal portion of ryanodine receptor. Biophys J 73: 1329–1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Takeshima H (1993) Primary structure and expression from cDNAs of the ryanodine receptor. Ann NY Acad Sci 707: 165–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. George CH, Jundi H, Thomas NL, Scoote M, Walters N, et al. (2004) Ryanodine receptor regulation by intramolecular interaction between cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains. Mol Biol Cell 15: 2627–2638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Inui M, Saito A, Fleischer S (1987) Isolation of the ryanodine receptor from cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum and identity with the feet structures. J Biol Chem 262: 15637–15642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zorzato F, Fujii J, Otsu K, Phillips M, Green NM, et al. (1990) Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding human and rabbit forms of the Ca2t release channel (ryanodine receptor) of skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 265: 2244–2256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Giannini G, Conti A, Mammarella S, Scrobogna M, Sorrentino V (1995) The ryanodine receptor/calcium channel genes are widely and differentially expressed in murine brain and peripheral tissues. J Cell Biol 128: 893–904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kato K, Kiyonaka S, Sawaguchi Y, Tohnishi M, Masaki T, et al. (2009) Molecular characterization of flubendiamide sensitivity in lepidopterous ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channel. Biochemistry 48: 10342–10352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ogawa Y, Murayama T, Kurebayashi N (1999) Comparison of properties of Ca2+ release channels between rabbit and frog skeletal muscles. Mol Cell Biochem190: 191–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ottini L, Marziali G, Conti A, Charlesworth A, Sorrentino V (1996) Alpha and beta isoforms of ryanodine receptor from chicken skeletal muscle are the homologues of mammalian RyR1 and RyR3. Biochem J 315: 207–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Takeshima H, Nishi M, Iwabe N, Miyata T, Hosoya T, et al. (1994) Isolation and characterization of a gene for a ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel in Drosophila melanogaster . FEBS Lett 337: 81–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wang JJ, Li YQ, Han ZJ, Zhu YL, Xie ZJ, et al. (2012) Molecular Characterization of a Ryanodine Receptor Gene in the Rice Leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée). PLOS ONE 7(5): e36623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Masaki T, Yasokawa N, Tohnishi M, Nishimatsu T, Tsubata K, et al. (2006) Flubendiamide, a novel Ca2+ channel modulator, reveals evidence for functional cooperation between Ca2+ pumps and Ca2+ release. Mol. Pharmacol. 69: 1733–1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Tohnishi M, Nakao H, Furuya T, Seo A, Kodama H, et al. (2005) Flubendiamide, a novel insecticide highly active against Lepidopterous insect pests. J Pestic Sci 30: 354–360. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U, Luemmen P, Lobitz N, Schulte T, Funke C, et al. (2006) Phthalic acid diamides activate ryanodine sensitive Ca2+ release channels in insects. Cell Calcium 39: 21–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Nauen R (2006) Insecticide mode of action: return of the ryanodine receptor. Pest Manag Sci 62: 690–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lahm GP, Selby TP, Freudenberger JH, Stevenson TM, Myers BJ, et al. (2005) Insecticidal anthranilic diamides: a new class of potent ryanodine receptor activators. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 15: 4898–4906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lahm GP, Stevenson TM, Selby TP, Freudenberger JH, Cordova D, et al. (2007) Rynaxypyre™: a new insecticidal anthranilic diamide that acts as a potent and selective ryanodine receptor activator. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 17: 6274–6279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cordova D, Benner EA, Sacher MD, Rauh JJ, Sopa JS, et al. (2006) Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation. Pestic Biochem Physiol 84: 196–214. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sattelle DB, Cordova E, Cheek TR (2008) Insect Ryanodine Receptors: molecular targets for novel pest control agents. Invertebr Neurosci 8: 107–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wang XL, Wu SW, Yang YH, Wu YD (2012) Molecular cloning, characterization and mRNA expression of a ryanodine receptor gene from diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella . Pestic Biochem Physiol 102: 204–212. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sun LN, Cui L, Rui CH, Yan XJ, Yang DB, et al. (2012) Modulation of the expression of ryanodine receptor mRNA from Plutella xylostella as a result of diamide insecticide application. Gene 511: 265–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Chen WL (2012) Field efficacy of 200 g/L chloranthraniliprole SC (Kang Kuan ™) against Asian corn borer. Seed World 5: 13. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 2002–2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ogawa Y (1994) Role of ryanodine receptors. Crit Rev Biochem Mol 29: 229–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wierenga RK, Hol WGJ (1983) Predicted nucleotide-binding properties of p21 protein and its cancer-associated variant. Nature 302: 842–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yamaguchi N, Xin C, Meissner G (2001) Identification of apocalmodulin and Ca2+-calmodulin regulatory domain in skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel, ryanodine receptor. J Biol Chem 276: 22579–22585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Du GG, MacLennan DH (1998) Functional consequences of mutations of conserved, polar amino acids in transmembrane sequences of the Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) of rabbit skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 273: 31867–31872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gao L, Balshaw D, Xu L, Tripathy A, Xin C, et al. (2000) Evidence for a role of the lumenal M3-M4 loop in skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) activity and conductance. Biophys J 79: 828–840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Guo L, Tang BZ, Dong W, Liang P, Gao XW (2012) Cloning, characterisation and expression profiling of the cDNA encoding the ryanodine receptor in diamondbackmoth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Pest Manag Sci. 68: 1605–1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zarka A, Shoshan-Barmatz V (1993) Characterization and photoaffinity labeling of the ATP binding site of the ryanodine receptor from skeletal muscle. Eur J Biochem 213: 147–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Xiong H, Feng X, Gao L, Xu L, Pasek DA, et al. (1998) Identification of a two EF-hand Ca2+ binding domain in lobster skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channel. Biochemistry 37: 4804–4814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rodney GG, Moore CP, Williams BY, Zhang JZ, Krol J, et al. (2001) Calcium binding to calmodulin leads to an N-terminal shift in its binding site on the ryanodine receptor. J Biol Chem 276: 2069–2074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Dulhunty AF, Pouliquin P (2003) What we don’t know about the structure of ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Clin Exp Pharmacol P 30: 713–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. George CH, Rogers SA, Bertrand BMA, Tunwell REA, Thomas NL, et al. (2007) Alternative Splicing of Ryanodine Receptors Modulates Cardiomyocyte Ca2+ Signaling and Susceptibility to Apoptosis. Circ Res 100: 874–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Johnson JM, Castle J, Garrett-Engele P, Kan ZY, Loerch PM, et al. (2003) Genome-Wide Survey of Human Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing with Exon Junction Microarrays. Science 302: 2141–2144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Liu S, Altman RB (2003) Large scale study of protein domain distribution in the context of alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 4828–4835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kimura T, Lueck JD, Harvey PJ, Pace SM, Ikemoto N, et al. (2009) Alternative splicing of RyR1 alters the efficacy of skeletal EC coupling. Cell Calcium 45: 264–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Akshay ADC, Jeffrey JB, Raymond SN, Nicos AN, Sandra EN (2013) Structure and function of the SPRY/B30.2 domain proteins involved in innate immunity. Protein Sci 22: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tae HS, Wei L, Willemse H, Mirza S, Gallant EM, et al. (2011) The elusive role of the SPRY2 domain in RyR1. Channels 5: 148–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.