Skip to main content
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology logoLink to Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
. 2013 Jul-Sep;16(3):456–457.

Author's reply on Pathophysiology of migraine

Peter J Goadsby 1,
PMCID: PMC3788313  PMID: 24101849

Sir,

Thank you for sending along correspondence with regard to a recent review.[1] I am grateful for your correspondents’ interest. They make three points:

  • They comment that citation of data from regional cerebral blood-flow studies[2] to demonstrate a disconnection between migraine pain and vasodilation is insufficient. I would agree. In a wide-reaching review sometimes not all data is cited. It is clear from other work from the same group that superficial temporal artery changes are not seen in migraine triggered by sildenafil,[3] among other examples one could adduce to this point

  • With regard to magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) work that does not demonstrate any change in extracranial vessel diameter in migraine,[4] the argument regarding vessel size is somewhat circular. While it is possible smaller vessels are the generator of pain; that has not been demonstrated and directly opposes all the more recent pharmacological data. If small vessels are important why does the non-vascular ditan class work?[5,6]

  • Your correspondent regards the claim that gepants are without vascular effects as a serious misrepresentation. As your correspondent admits olcegepant is not a vasoconstrictor.[7] The statement made was that olcegepant has no vascular action, not that it stops calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) having vasodilation. Nothing about olcegepant was misrepresented. Your correspondent tendentiously pursues vasodilation with a single example, while ignoring that the gepant data sits with the entirety of the clinical trial literature, conveniently ignoring the ditan data cited above or indeed simple things, such as the data on intravenous aspirin in migraine,[8] again as a non-vascular acute treatment.

May I add on a personal note, whatever reason some may have for developing CGRP receptor antagonists, I can assure you that the first rationale was to look at CGRP release in terms neural mechanisms.[9,10] Migraine is a brain disorder;[11] the sooner the organ of the disorder receives full focus, the nearer we come to both enhanced understanding and better therapies.

References

  • 1.Goadsby PJ. Pathophysiology of migraine. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012;15:S15–22. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.99993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olesen J, Friberg L, Olsen TS, Iversen HK, Lassen NA, Andersen AR, et al. Timing and topography of cerebral blood flow, aura, and headache during migraine attacks. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:791–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kruuse C, Thomsen LL, Birk S, Olesen J. Migraine can be induced by sildenafil without changes in middle cerebral artery diameter. Brain. 2003;126:241–7. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schoonman GG, van der Grond J, Kortmann C, van der Geest RJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD. Migraine headache is not associated with cerebral or meningeal vasodilatation: A 3T magnetic resonance angiography study. Brain. 2008;131:2192–200. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ferrari MD, Färkkilä M, Reuter U, Pilgrim A, Davis C, Krauss M, et al. Acute treatment of migraine with the selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan: A randomised proof-of-concept trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:1170–8. doi: 10.1177/0333102410375512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Färkkilä M, Diener HC, Géraud G, Láinez M, Schoenen J, Harner N, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of lasmiditan, an oral 5-HT(1F) receptor agonist, for the acute treatment of migraine: A phase 2 randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:405–13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Petersen KA, Birk S, Lassen LH, Kruuse C, Jonassen O, Lesko L, et al. The CGRP-antagonist, BIBN4096BS does not affect cerebral or systemic haemodynamics in healthy volunteers. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:139–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00830.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Diener HC The ASASUMAMIG Study Group. Efficacy and safety of intravenous acetylsalicylic acid lysinate compared to subcutaneous sumatriptan and parenteral placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicenter, parallel group study. Cephalalgia. 1999;19:581–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019006581.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Edvinsson L, Ekman R, Goadsby PJ. Vasoactive peptides in the trigeminovascular system of man. Cephalalgia. 1987;7:10–2. doi: 10.1002/ana.410230214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goadsby PJ, Edvinsson L, Ekman R. Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:183–7. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Akerman S, Holland PR, Goadsby PJ. Diencephalic and brainstem mechanisms in migraine. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:570–84. doi: 10.1038/nrn3057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES