Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Surgery logoLink to Canadian Journal of Surgery
. 1999 Aug;42(4):284–288.

Randomized, controlled trial of bupivacaine injection to decrease pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Deepak Dath *, Adrian E Park †,
PMCID: PMC3788998  PMID: 10459328

Abstract

Objectives

To determine if intraoperative instillation of bupivacaine would decrease early postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, if the patients would consequently require less narcotic postoperatively and if such patients would elect to be discharged on the day of operation if given the choice.

Design

Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting

A tertiary care hospital in Hamilton, Ont.

Patients

Fifty patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Day-surgery patients had the choice of staying overnight for discharge the following day. They were compared with a control group of 47 patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy but did not receive bupivacaine.

Intervention

Instillation of 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine into laparoscopic cholecystectomy port sites intraoperatively before closure.

Main outcome measures

Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores assessed 4 times postoperatively, the choice of patients to leave hospital the same day or to remain in the hospital overnight; the level of postoperative narcotic usage.

Main results

Mean VAS pain scores (range 0 [no pain] to 5 [severe pain]) at less than 2 hours and at 6 hours after surgery were 2.9 and 2.9, respectively, in the bupivacaine group compared with 4.5 and 4.0, respectively, in the control group (p = 0.001 and 0.025). VAS scores at 10 hours postoperatively and the next morning did not differ between the groups. More patients in the bupivacaine group elected to go home on the day of surgery (p = 0.034). Narcotic usage was not significantly different.

Conclusion

Instillation of bupivacaine into port sites should be standard practice for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (121.8 KB).


Articles from Canadian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES