Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2013 Oct 3;1(5):e00780-13. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00780-13

Genome Sequence of Streptococcus parauberis Strain KCTC11980, Isolated from Diseased Paralichthys olivaceus

Myoung Ae Park a, Mun Gyeong Kwon a, Jee Youn Hwang a, Sung Hee Jung a, Dong-Wook Kim c, Jin-Young Park c, Ji-Sun Kim c, Yun-Jeong Na c, Min-Young Kim c, Dae-Soo Kim b, Sung-Hwa Chae c,, Jung Soo Seo a,
PMCID: PMC3790086  PMID: 24092782

Abstract

Streptococcus parauberis is a coccoid, nonmotile, alpha-hemolytic, Gram-positive bacterium of the Streptococcaceae family. Streptococcus parauberis strain KCTC11980 was isolated from the kidney of a diseased olive flounder collected from an aquaculture farm on Jeju Island in 2010. The 2.12-Mb genome sequence consists of 44 large contigs in 16 scaffolds and contains 2,214 predicted protein-coding genes, with a G+C content of 35.4%.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Streptococcosis mediated by streptococci, such as Streptococcus iniae and S. parauberis, has been a major cause of mass mortality in marine aquaculture systems (13). Among these species, Streptococcus parauberis was first described as the etiologic agent of bovine mastitis (4) and later found to cause streptococcosis in cultured turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in Spain (5, 6). Recently, a streptococcal infection caused by Streptococcus parauberis has increased in frequency in the olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) aquaculture industry in South Korea (7, 8). S. parauberis is a coccoid, nonmotile, alpha-hemolytic, Gram-positive bacterium of the Streptococcaceae family. S. parauberis and S. uberis are common agents of bovine mastitis (4). Genomic DNA was extracted from cultured bacterial isolates using the alkaline lysis method (9). We sequenced the genome of S. parauberis because it had not been sequenced at the time our sequencing project began, according to the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) (10). We report the genome sequence of S. parauberis strain KCTC1980, obtained using a whole-genome shotgun strategy (11) with a Roche 454 GS (FLX titanium) pyrosequencing system (775,572 reads, totaling ~113.6 Mb; ~28.9-fold coverage of the genome). Pyrosequencing was processed using Roche’s software, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All of the paired reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler 2.6 (454 Life Science), which generated 66 contigs (GenBank accession no. BANN01000001 through BANN01000066), and the assembly falls into 16 scaffolds (accession no. DF266806 through DF266821). The predicted proteins were annotated using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (12) and the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (13). In addition, open reading frame (ORF) prediction was performed using CD-HIT software, with which contigs were searched against the Glimmer 3.02 modeling software package and GeneMark version 2.5 (14), tRNAscan-SE 1.21 (15), RNAmmer 1.2 (16), and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) (17) databases to annotate the gene descriptions.

The S. parauberis draft genome includes 2,127,951 bp and is composed of 2,214 predicted coding sequences (CDS), with a G+C content of 35.4%. The genome contained representatives of 311 subsystems, and we used this information to reconstruct the metabolic network (determined using the RAST server). A distinguishing subsystem feature was the absence of genes corresponding to a conserved domain protein, ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein, membrane protein, and transcriptional regulator. The CDS annotated by the COG database were classified into eight major categories (R, G, S, K, J, E, L, and P) from among the 42 COG groups. The enzymes identified included pantothenate kinase (EC 2.7.1.33), tRNA pseudouridine synthase A (EC 5.4.99.12), and DNA polymerase III subunit delta (EC 2.7.7.7). More detailed analysis of this genome and a comparative analysis with other S. parauberis genomes may well identify other genes upon finalization of the genome.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome sequence of S. parauberis KCTC11980 is available in GenBank under the accession number BANN00000000 (DF266806 through DF266821). The version described in this paper is version BANN01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by a grant from the National Fisheries Research & Development Institute.

Footnotes

Citation Park MA, Kwon MG, Hwang JY, Jung SH, Kim D-W, Park J-Y, Kim J-S, Na Y-J, Kim M-Y, Kim D-S, Chae S-H, Seo JS. 2013. Genome sequence of Streptococcus parauberis strain KCTC11980, isolated from diseased Paralichthys olivaceus. Genome Announc. 1(5):e00780-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00780-13.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Austin B, Austin DA. 1999. Bacterial fish pathogens: disease in farmed and wild fish, p 38–49 Ellis Horwood, Chichester, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ghittino C, Latini M, Agnetti F, Panzieri C, Lauro L, Ciappelloni R, Petracca G. 2003. Emerging pathologies in aquaculture: effects on production and food safety. Vet. Res. Commun. 27(Suppl 1):471–479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kitao T. 1993. Streptococcal infection, p 196–210 In Inglis V, Roberts RJ, Bromage NR. (ed), Bacterial diseases of fish. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Williams AM, Collins MD. 1990. Molecular taxonomic studies on Streptococcus uberis types I and II. Description of Streptococcus parauberis sp. nov. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 68:485–490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Doménech A, Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Pascual C, Garcia JA, Cutuli MT, Moreno MA, Collins MD, Dominguez L. 1996. Streptococcosis in cultured turbot, Scopthalmus maximus (L.), associated with Streptococcus parauberis. J. Fish Dis. 19:33–38 [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Toranzo AE, Cutrín JM, Núñez S, Romalde JL, Barja JL. 1995. Antigenic characterization of Enterococcus strains pathogenic for turbot and their relationship with other Gram-positive bacteria. Dis. Aquat. Org. 21:187–191 [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Baeck GW, Kim JH, Gomez DK, Park SC. 2006. Isolation and characterization of Streptococcus sp. from diseased flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) in Jeju Island. J. Vet. Sci. 7:53–58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cho MY, Oh YK, Lee DC, Kim JH, Park MY. 2007. Geographical comparison on different methods for identification of Streptococcus parauberis isolated from cultured olive flounder, Paralichthys olivacues. Fish Pathol. 20:49–60 [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Birnboim HC, Doly J. 1979. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 7:1513–1523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. 2010. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:D346–D354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, Bult CJ, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Merrick JM, McKenney K, Sutton G, FitzHugh W, Fields C, Gocayne JD, Soctt J, Shirley R, Liu L, Glodek A, Kelley JM, Weidman JF, Phillips CA, Spriggs T, Hedblom E, Cotton MD, Utterback TR, Hanna MC, Nguyen DT, Saudek DM, Brandon RC, Fine JL, Fritchman JL, Fuhrmann NS, Geoghagen CL, Gnehm LA, Mcdonald KV, Small CM, Fraser HO, Smith JC, Venter C. 1995. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269:496–512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389–3402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278:631–637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES