Abstract
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductases (MTHFRs) play a key role in the biosynthesis of methionine in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. In this study, we report the identification of a novel T-DNA-tagged mutant WH672 in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which was defective in vegetative growth, conidiation and pathogenicity. Analysis of the mutation confirmed a single T-DNA insertion upstream of MET13, which encodes a 626-amino-acid protein encoding a MTHFR. Targeted gene deletion of MET13 resulted in mutants that were non-pathogenic and significantly impaired in aerial growth and melanin pigmentation. All phenotypes associated with Δmet13 mutants could be overcome by addition of exogenous methionine. The M. oryzae genome contains a second predicted MTHFR-encoding gene, MET12. The deduced amino acid sequences of Met13 and Met12 share 32% identity. Interestingly, Δmet12 mutants produced significantly less conidia compared with the isogenic wild-type strain and grew very poorly in the absence of methionine, but were fully pathogenic. Deletion of both genes resulted in Δmet13Δmet12 mutants that showed similar phenotypes to single Δmet13 mutants. Taken together, we conclude that the MTHFR gene, MET13, is essential for infection-related morphogenesis by the rice blast fungus M. oryzae.
Introduction
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR; EC 1.5.1.20) catalyzes the reduction of 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2-THF) to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (CH3-THF), which is required for methionine biosynthesis. In humans, deficiency of MTHFR is the most common genetic defect in folate metabolism, which results in hyperhomocysteinemia, homocystinuria, and hypomethionemia [1]. Elevated levels of homocysteine, due to MTHFR deficiency, are also associated with increased risks of vascular disease and neural tube defects [1,2]. Genes encoding MTHFRs of many species, including bacteria, fungi, plants and mammals, have previously been identified and characterized [1,3-5]. Most fungal species appear to have two MTHFR encoding genes, such as MET12 and MET13 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [1], MET11 and MET9 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe [6], META and METF in Aspergillus nidulans [7], and FgMET13 and FgMET12 in Fusarium graminearum [8]. In S. cerevisiae, disruption of MET13 causes methionine auxotrophy, while disruption of MET12 causes no detectable phenotype [1,2]. However, in A. nidulans, disruption of either METF (MET13 homologue) or META (MET12 homologue) results in methionine auxotrophy [7]. Targeted gene replacement of either F. graminearum FgMET13 or FgMET12 also leads to methionine auxotrophy and affects pigment biosynthesis [8]. However, the role of MTHFRs in plant infection by pathogenic fungi has not been explored in detail.
The ascomycete fungus Magnaporthe oryzae is the causal agent of rice blast, the most destructive disease of rice worldwide [9,10]. Rice blast infections are initiated by attachment and germination of conidia on the rice leaf surface. A dome-shaped infection structure, called an appressorium, forms at the tip of a short germ tube and uses turgor to drive a rigid penetration peg through the rice leaf cuticle [10]. After penetration, the fungus forms a primary invasive hypha that further differentiates into bulbous infection hyphae within infected host plant cells. M. oryzae grows biotrophically without killing infected plant cells during the early stages of infection. Necrotic disease lesions develop on rice plants after 3-5 days and abundant conidia are produced from lesions during the late stages of infection to re-initiate successive rounds of plant infection. Due to its socioeconomic impact and genetic tractability, M. oryzae has been utilized as a model fungal pathogen for understanding the molecular basis of plant-fungus interactions [11-16]. In the past decade, there have been extensive studies on molecular mechanisms that regulate plant infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity in M. oryzae. Many genes involved in signaling or metabolic pathways, required for fungal growth, conidiation, appressorium formation, penetration and pathogenicity, have been identified and characterized [14,16-27]. However, there are still fundamental gaps in our knowledge regarding the contribution of fundamental pathways, such as amino acid biosynthesis, to the establishment of rice blast disease.
Recently, we carried out a large-scale Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) screen of M. oryzae to identify insertional mutants defining novel genes required for pathogenicity. Several important genes, required for regulating different stages of infection-related morphogenesis in M. oryzae, have been identified from this initial screen [28-30]. Here, we present the identification and characterization of M. oryzae, MET13, which putatively encodes a MTHFR required for pathogenicity. Targeted gene deletion mutants of MET13 were methionine auxotrophs, consistent with the predicted role for MET13 in methionine biosynthesis. Additionally, aerial growth and colony pigmentation were affected by absence of the gene. MET13 is therefore essential for infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus.
Results
Identification of a non-pathogenic mutant WH672
We carried out ATMT of the wild-type M. oryzae strain Guy11 [31] using a binary vector to obtain insertional mutants displaying defects in pathogenesis. During this screen, we identified a mutant, WH672, which grew poorly on complete medium (hereafter called CM) [32], and did not produce melanin pigmented hyphae (Figure 1A; Table S1). Interestingly, the mutant was unable to sporulate and was also incapable of causing rice blast disease following inoculation of susceptible barley or rice leaves with hyphae (Figure 1 B). DNA gel blot analysis showed that a single T-DNA integration event had occurred in the genome of WH672 (not shown). We therefore decided to perform further characterization of the mutant to determine its role in pathogenicity.
Identification of the T-DNA tagged gene MET13 in WH672
To identify the T-DNA integration site in the WH672 mutant, a 0.6 kb genomic DNA flanking region of the integrated T-DNA (Figure 1C) was obtained using a hi-TAIL PCR strategy [33], and then sequenced. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the T-DNA insertion site was situated at 815 bp upstream of the translational start site of a gene, MGG_01728.6 (XP_363802), located on supercontig 27 of chromosome I (Figure 1D), which putatively encodes a Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR 1). We named the T-DNA tagged gene MET13, because it encodes a protein showing 46.59% identity to S. cerevisae Met13. To confirm the position and size of the introns of M. oryzae MET13, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was carried out using the primers CDS13F and CDS13R (Table S2) and the cDNA sequence and genome sequence were compared. This confirmed that MET13 has an open reading frame of 1,878 bp interrupted by a single intron (67 bp) and putatively encodes a 626 aa protein, which is 100% identical to the protein sequence predicted by automated annotation of the M. oryzae genome sequence [34] (Figure 1D). A local BLASTP search with M. oryzae Met13 revealed that the fungus has another gene MET12 (MGG_08171.6), that putatively encodes a second MTHFR (MTHFR2) with 690 aa, which is homologous to S. cerevisae Met12 (42.84% amino acid identity). MET12 has an open reading frame of 2,070 bp without introns, confirmed by RT-PCR using the primers CDS12F and CDS12R (Table S2). Alignment of M. oryzae Met13 and Met12 is shown in Figure S1 and they share 31.98% identity at the amino acid level. Additionally, Met13 and Met12 exhibit high levels of amino acid identity to corresponding MTHFRs from related fungi, such as Neurospora crassa (75.28% and 71.61%), Gibberella zeae (73.69% and 69.55%) and A. nidulans (62.18% and 56.41%). Phylogenetic analysis of the putative homologues of Met13 and Met12 from several fungal species is shown in Figure S2. These MTHFRs could be divided into two groups: MTHFR1 and MTHFR2, indicating the two MTHFRs may have originated independently.
MET13 is crucial for mycelium pigment and virulence
To verify the phenotypes associated with WH672 were caused by the insertion mutation, we performed targeted gene deletion of MET13 using the gene replacement vector pMET13-KO (Figure S3A). Four targeted gene replacement mutants, K56, K73, K85 and K96 (Table S1), were identified by PCR analysis from 96 transformants using primers CDS13F and CDS13R (Table S2; Figure S3A). Gene replacement of the K56 and K73 mutants was further confirmed by Southern blot analysis and PCR amplification using primers F13 and R13 (Table S2; Figure S3B and C). Using a similar strategy, two targeted gene deletion mutants of MET12, K12-7 and K12-13, were obtained (Figure S3 D and E). The four Δmet13 or two Δmet12 mutants showed consistent phenotypes, although only K56 (Δmet13) and K12-7 (Δmet12) are described below. Consistent with mutant WH672, the Δmet13 mutant formed colonies that were poorly pigmented when grown on CM medium and produced very few aerial hyphae when compared with Guy11 (Figure 2A). However, the Δmet12 mutant grew normally and formed colonies that were more similar in appearance to Guy11, albeit slightly less pigmented (Figure 2A). In order to further investigate the roles of MET13 and MET12 in development and virulence of M. oryzae, three Δmet13Δmet12 double mutants (DK7, DK13 and DK18) were generated (Table S1; Figure S3F). The Δmet13Δmet12 mutants (DK7) formed similar colonies to single Δmet13 mutants on CM medium (Figure 2A), indicating that MET13 may play more important roles in aerial growth and melanization than MET12 in M. oryzae.
To test for the ability of the mutants to cause rice blast disease, a modified assay was used because Δmet13 and Δmet13Δmet12 mutants were unable to sporulate. Mycelial plugs were removed from the edges of 10 day-old colonies and used to inoculate plants. The Δmet13, Δmet12 and Δmet13Δmet12 mutants were used to inoculate leaves of the susceptible barley cultivar Golden Promise and rice cultivar CO-39 using a cut-leaf assay as shown in Figure 2B. The Δmet13 mutant was completely non-pathogenic on both susceptible barley and rice leaves (Figure 2B), even when leaf surfaces were abraded, consistent with the non-pathogenic phenotype of WH672 and confirming that MET13 is necessary for virulence of M. oryzae. Similarly, the Δmet13Δmet12 mutants were also non-pathogenic (Figure 2B). However, the Δmet12 mutant was full pathogenic on both barley and rice (Figure 2B). Similar results were observed when mycelium was harvested from liquid CM cultures and used to inoculate barley or rice leaves (not shown). Root infection assays showed that the Δmet13 mutants, but not Δmet12 mutants, were also defective in root infection on rice seedlings (Figure 2C). We conclude that M. oryzae MET13 is essential for virulence in M. oryzae.
MET13 is essential for conidiation and appressorium formation by M. oryzae
Phenotypic analysis showed that the Δmet13 and Δmet12 mutants were not significantly reduced in radial growth, forming colonies with diameters of 6.07 ± 0.06 cm and 6.17 ± 0.06 cm after 10-days incubation on CM at 25°C, respectively. However, the Δmet13Δmet12 mutants formed smaller colonies with a diameter of 5.73 ± 0.06 cm (P<0.05), compared with 6.27 ± 0.12 cm in the wild-type strain Guy11 (Figure 2A and Figure 3A). The ability to form asexual spores was evaluated by carefully washing the surface of 12-day-old cultures. WH672, Δmet13 and Δmet13Δmet12 mutants were unable to produce conidia and formed very few aerial hyphae, whereas Guy11 produced 21.08 ± 1.79×106 spores per plate (Figure 3B and C). The Δmet12 mutant was able to sporulate but produced significantly fewer conidia 15.27 ± 1.00 × 106 per plate. MET13 is therefore important for aerial hypha formation and conidiation in M. oryzae.
To determine whether deletion of MET13 had an effect on appressorium formation, we harvested mycelium of the Δmet13, Δmet12 and Δmet13Δmet12 mutants from liquid CM culture. Hyphae were incubated on hydrophobic surfaces and appressoria allowed to form. Guy11 and the Δmet12 mutant formed appressoria normally, whereas the Δmet13 mutant was unable to form appressoria (Figure 3D). Similarly, the WH672 and Δmet13Δmet12 mutants were unable to form appressoria from mycelium under the same conditions (not shown). The Δmet12 mutant was also able to form appressoria when conidia were germinated on hydrophobic surfaces (data not shown). These results suggest that MET13 is required for appressorium formation by M. oryzae.
Deletion of MET13 results in the inability of M. oryzae to grow on minimal growth medium
Deletion of MET13 resulted in highly reduced aerial hyphae development and pigment production following growth on CM medium (Figure 2A). To investigate the growth of Δmet13 and Δmet12 mutants, each strain was grown on alternative growth medium, including minimal medium (MM), oatmeal agar (OMA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA). Interestingly, deletion of MET13 completely prevented vegetative growth on MM and OMA media, and the growth of the Δmet12 mutant was also significantly restricted, although both mutants could grow on PDA medium (Figure 4). The growth defects of the mutants on MM and OMA are likely due to the restricted amino acid content of these growth media.
To determine the role of MET13 and MET12 in sexual reproduction, the wild type strain Guy11 (MAT1-2) and the Δmet13, Δmet12 and Δmet13Δmet12 double mutants were crossed with a standard tester strain TH3 (MAT1-1) [35] of M. oryzae to allow perithecium production. After four weeks, junctions between mated individuals were examined for the presence of perithecia. Numerous perithecia were observed at the junctions of crosses between Guy11 and TH3, but no perithecia were formed by the crosses of Δmet13 × TH3 or Δmet13Δmet12 × TH3, even when the incubation time was extended (Figure S4). Additionally, only a few perithecia were observed from the cross between Δmet12 and TH3 (Figure S4). These results suggest that both MET13 and MET12 are required for fertility and development of fruiting bodies and sexual spores by M. oryzae.
Re-introduction of MET13 into a Δmet13 mutant restores all phenotypes
To ensure that the phenotypic differences observed in Δmet13 mutants were associated with the gene replacement event, we carried out phenotypic analysis of the complementation transformants C3, C5 and C6 in which the full length MET13 gene was re-introduced (Table S1). All three transformants exhibited full virulence to barley and rice by spray-inoculation or using cut-leaf assays. All phenotypes of Δmet13 mutants, including vegetative growth, sporulation and appressorium formation, were fully complemented by re-introduction of the gene (Figures 2-4; Figure S4). However, GFP fluorescence was not observed in hyphae, conidia and appressoria of the complementation transformants, implicating low Met13-GFP expression during vegetative growth and morphological differentiation of M. oryzae. Additionally, phenotypes associated with Δmet12 mutants were also fully restored by re-introducing the full length MET12 gene into the mutants (not shown).
Δmet13 mutant phenotypes can be overcome by addition of exogenous methionine
To determine whether Δmet13 mutant phenotypes, such as vegetative growth, mycelium pigment and conidiation, could be rescued by adding exogenous methionine, the WH672, Δmet13 and Δmet12 mutants were grown on MM medium with 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mM methionine at 25°C for 10 days, respectively. We observed that growth and colony pigmentation of WH672, Δmet13 and Δmet12 mutants were restored by methionine (Figure 5). Defects in vegetative growth and mycelium pigment for the Δmet12 but not Δmet13 mutants were also partially complemented by adding exogenous homocysteine (Figure 5). However, all mutants were unable to grow on MM medium following supplementation with 2 mM ammonium sulfate (Figure 5). Additionally, we observed that Δmet13 mutants were able to produce conidia on MM medium upon supplementation with methionine, although the number of conidia produced by the mutants was still significantly less than the wild-type strain (data not shown). These results indicate that both Δmet12 and Δmet13 mutants are methionine auxotrophs.
To understand whether conidiation of the Δmet13 mutants could be restored by exogenous methionine, we added 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 mM methionine to CM medium. Our results showed that the defects in aerial growth and mycelium pigment of the Δmet13 mutant could all be overcome by adding methionine (Figure S5A). However, melanization of the Δmet13 mutant was impaired when supplemented with >6 mM methionine (Figure S5A). Supplementation with methionine also partially restored conidiation (Figure S5B). The growth defect of the Δmet13 mutant in liquid CM medium was also complemented by adding 1 mM methionine (Figure S6). Taken together, the developmental phenotypes associated with Δmet13 mutants, including vegetative growth, mycelium pigment and conidiation could all be overcome by addition of exogenous methionine.
We further tested sexual reproduction of the Δmet13 mutants on OMA medium following supplementation with methionine. We observed numerous perthecia at the junctions of crosses Guy11 × TH3 and Δmet12 × TH3 following supplementation with 0.25 mM or 0.5 mM methionine, whereas few perithecia of the cross of Δmet13 × TH3 was formed (Figure 6). However, numerous perthecia were produced from all crosses when the concentration of methionine increased to 1 mM (Figure 6). Sexual morphogenesis in Δmet13 mutants can therefore be overcome by exogenous methionine. Similarly, appressorium development could also be restored following methionine supplementation (Figure 7A). However, the penetration rate of the Δmet13 mutant was only 40.67 ± 7.02%, which was significantly lower than 81.33 ± 4.73% of Guy 11 and 78.67 ± 6.11% of the Δmet12 mutant. Moreover, invasive haphae formed by the Δmet13 mutant in onion epidermic cells were shorter than those of the wild type strain (Figure 7A).
To test whether pathogenicity could be restored in the presence of methionine, spores of the Δmet13 mutant were harvested from the CM cultures containing 2 mM methionine and spores diluted to 1 × 105 spores ml-1 in 1 mM methionine solution. Conidial suspensions were then spray-inoculated onto susceptible rice leaves. We observed that the Δmet13 mutant was able to infect rice leaves and form typical blast lesions, although the virulence of the mutant was moderate compared with Guy11 and Δmet12 (Figure 7 B). Virulence of the Δmet13 mutants can therefore be restored by exogenous methionine.
Deletion of MET13 results in up-regulation of MET12 and vice versa
As both MET12 and MET13 putatively encode MTHFR enzymes, we decided to investigate whether the expression of each gene was altered upon deletion of the other. We therefore carried out quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. As expected, gene expression of MET13 was not detected in WH672 and Δmet13 and MET12 was not expressed in the Δmet12 mutant (Figure 8). However, expression of MET13 was 1.6 fold up-regulated in the Δmet12 mutant and expression of MET12 was 4.0 fold up-regulated in both WH672 and Δmet13 mutants (Figure 8). These results are consistent with both genes encoding MTHFR and an attempt to restore methionine biosynthesis by up-regulation of the alternative gene.
Expression analysis of genes involved in methionine biosynthesis upon deletion of MET13
Based on previous studies of methionine biosynthesis in yeasts and filamentous fungi, an outline of predicted methionine metabolism pathway in M. oryzae was described, as shown in Figure 9A. Cysteine is converted to methionine by a pathway that begins with cystathionine γ-synthase and cystathionine β-lyase, respectively (Figure 9A). Methionine can then be generated from homocysteine, which is methylated by 5-methyltetrahydrofolate via methionine synthase (cobalamin- independent methionine synthase). Several genes were predicted to be involved in this process and are listed in Figure 9A. To determine the expression patterns of genes putatively involved in methionine metabolism, qRT-PCR assays were performed. Deletion of MET12 resulted in down-regulation of MS1 (MGG_06712), SHM1 (MGG_13781) and HCS1 (MGG_07195), which putatively encode methionine synthase, serine hydroxymethyltransferase and homocysteine synthase, respectively, while all other genes were up-regulated (Figure 9B). However, deletion of MET13 led to 2.19-14.83 fold up-regulation of most genes, although MS1 was down-regulated (Figure 9B). Interestingly, most of the genes involved in methionine metabolism were significantly down-regulated in the Δmet13Δmet12 mutant (Figure 9B). These results indicate that both MET13 and MET12 play important roles in regulating expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in methionine metabolism in M. oryzae.
Furthermore, we selected several sulfur metabolism genes (MGG_10308 and MGG_07920 putatively encoding arylsulfatase, MGG_06466 encoding cysteine synthase and MGG_07195 encoding homocysteine synthase by M. oryzae) and carried out qRT-PCR analysis of their expression in Δmet13 and Δmet12 mutants. The results showed that MGG_10308, MGG_07920, MGG_06466 and MGG_07195 were slightly up-regulated by 1.27±0.2, 1.12±0.25, 1.24±0.36 and 1.31±0.18 fold in the Δmet12 mutant, respectively, and 1.25±0.11, 1.42±0.12, 1.27±0.39 and 1.23±0.24 fold in the Δmet13 mutant, respectively. These data suggested that above sulfur metabolism genes were not significantly regulated by the deletion of MET12 or MET13.
Discussion
MTHFR is a critical enzyme for converting 5,10-CH2-THF to 5-CH3-THF, and the latter then serves as a major methyl donor in the re-methylation of homocysteine to methionine. Most fungal genomes, including yeasts and filamentous fungi, contain two types of MTHFRs [1,6-8]. In this report, we identified a non-pathogenic mutant WH672 of M. oryzae using T-DNA insertional mutagenesis, and identified MET13, which putatively encodes a homologue of S. cerevisiae Met13 (MTHFR1). We also identified MET12, which putatively encoding a homologue of S. cerevisiae Met12 (MTHFR2). Deletion of MET13 resulted in methionine auxotrophy and deletion of MET12 also caused slow growth on MM medium without methionine, indicating that both genes are required for methionine synthesis by M. oryzae. Phenotypic analysis showed that MET13 was essential for mycelium pigment, conidiation, appressorium formation and virulence by M. oryzae. However, deleting MET12 led only to minor phenotypic alterations, such as a reduction in sporulation. These results suggest that MTHFR1 may provide the majority of cellular MTHFR activity, although MTHFR2 is also involved in methionine synthesis in M. oryzae.
In S. cerevisiae, deletion of MET13 but not MET12 leads to methionine auxotrophy and results in loss of MTHFR activity, although Met12 is also responsible for approximately 15% MTHFR activity [1]. Similarly, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, analysis of MTHFR activity shows that Met9 (a Met13 homologue) is responsible for approximately 80 to 85% of the total MTHFR activity [6]. In A. nidulans, disruption of either METF (a MET13 homologue) or META (a MET12 homologue) results in methionine auxotrophy [7]. Analysis of enzymatic activity shows that the META-encoded enzyme is responsible for only 10-15% of total MTHFR activity [7]. Unlike metA strains, metF disruptant strains grow poorly on minimal medium supplemented with 0.25 mM methionine and required at least 1 mM methionine for growth and conidiation [7]. Methionine auxotrophy of metA but not metF mutants can be overcome by the addition of homocysteine [7]. In F. graminearum, deletion of either of the two MTHFR encoding genes, FgMET13 and FgMET12, leads to methionine auxotrophy [8]. However, unlike in A. nidulans, homocysteine is unable to rescue either of the gene deletion mutants. These previous studies suggest that MTHFR1 and MTHFR2 may have overlapping catalytic properties, although MTHFR1 appears to be more important to cellular MTHFR activity. In this study, methionine but not homocysteine could complement methionine auxotrophy of Δmet13 mutants (Figure 5). However, growth defects of Δmet12 mutants were rescued by exogenous methionine and also partially overcome by adding homocysteine, suggesting that regulation in M. oryzae is similar to A. nidulans but distinct to F. graminearum. Additionally, the double deletion mutants of MET13 and MET12 were also methionine auxotrophs and had similar phenotypes to Δmet13 mutants, suggesting that Met13 might be the predominant source of methionine biosynthetic activity in M. oryzae.
In Leishmania major (a protozoan parasite), a causative agent of human diseases, LmMTHFR null mutants cannot utilize exogenous homocysteine for growth and grow poorly under conditions of methionine limitation, but are still virulent in a mouse model of infection [36]. To date, MTHFR has not been reported as a virulent determinant in phytopathogenic fungi. Recently, it has been reported that MTHFR is involved in the plasma membrane redox system required for pigment biosynthesis in filamentous fungi [8,37]. In F. pseudograminearum, an exogenous T-DNA integration in the promoter of FpsMET13 (a MET13 homologue) caused accumulation of yellow pigment instead of aurofusarin in mycelia [8,37]. In F. graminearum, either FgMET13 or FgMET12 is required for pigment biosynthesis [8]. Deletion of FgMET12 displayed a delay in the production of the mycelium pigment aurofusarin and instead accumulated norrubrofusarin and rubrofusarin, while the defects could be rescued by high concentration of exogenous methionine or prolonged incubation [8]. The Δfgmet13 mutants, however, remained aurofusarin deficient at all tested methionine concentrations and instead accumulated nor-rubrofusarin and rubrofusarin [8]. Here, we showed that deletion of M. oryzae MET13 led a defect in plant infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity (Figures 2 and 3). The Δmet13 mutants were completely unable to produce conidia, form appressoria or cause blast disease. In contrast to MET13, deletion of MET12 led to a significant reduction in conidiation on CM medium (Figure 3B and C), but Δmet12 mutants were still able to form melanized appressorium and cause blast disease (Figure 2B and C; Figure 3D). Similar to F. graminearum, colony pigmentation of Δmet13 mutants was significantly reduced compared with Δmet12 mutants (Figure 2A), suggesting that Met13 is also involved in pigment synthesis in M. oryzae.
In S. cerevisiae, overexpression of MET12 failed to rescue methionine auxotrophy of a MET13 deletion strain [1]. In this study, qRT-PCR analysis showed that deletion of MET13 led to a significant increase in MET12 expression and vice versa (Figure 8), indicating that the MET12 expression in a Δmet13 mutant is insufficient to complement defects caused by deletion of MET13. Similarly, overexpression of MET12 in a Δmet13 mutant did not overcome its mutant phenotypes.
Surprisingly, deletion of MET13 (but not MET12) led to significant up-regulated expression of several genes involved in methionine metabolism such as SHM1 and SAM1 encoding serine hydroxymethyltransferase and S-adenosyl-methionine synthase, respectively (Figure 9B). Biosynthesis of methionine was significantly impaired in Δmet13 mutants, but the mutants may have the ability to synthesize some methionine by up-regulated expression of MET12 and other genes, including SHM1 and SHM2. In addition, since S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) is an important substrate involved in methyl group transfers, the Δmet13 mutants may up-regulate the expression of SAM1 to maintain the normal levels of SAM in cells. However, the exact regulation mechanism of these genes involved in methionine metabolism still remains to be elucidated.
Methionine is a crucial sulfur-containing amino acid, which is not only an essential component of proteins but also acts in the initiation of translation. Previous studies showed that the methionine synthesis pathway may be involved in virulence in phytopathogenic fungi. In F. graminearum, deletion of either CBL1 or MSY1, encoding cystathionine beta-lyase and methionine synthase, respectively, were methionine auxotrophs and significantly reduced in virulence on corn silks and wheat heads [38]. Recently, it was shown that FgMETB, encoding cystathionine gamma-synthase, is essential for methionine biosynthesis in F. graminearum [39]. Deletion of FgMETB led to a significant reduction of conidial germination in 2% sucrose solution and virulence on wheat heads [39]. In M. oryzae, it has been reported that a methionine auxotrophic mutant, 130, was reduced in virulence on rice seedlings [40]. Additionally, M. oryzae CBS1 encoding cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) which catalyzes formation of cystathionine from homocysteine and serine has been functionally characterized [41]. However, the null (cbs1) mutants were still virulent on rice [41]. M. oryzae STR3 encodes cystathionine β-lyase that converts cystathionine to homocysteine during the biosynthesis of methionine. A recent report showed that deletion of STR3 resulted in methionine auxotrophy and methionine-requiring phenotypes could be complemented by supplementation with methionine [42]. Live-cell-imaging showed that the Δstr3 mutants failed to develop in host cells and were unable to cause blast disease, although they could produce normal appressoria and enter host cells, indicating some nutrients might not be readily available to M. oryzae in rice host cells [42]. Our results demonstrated that Δmet13 mutants were strict methionine auxotrophs and essential for infection-related development and initial infection of both rice and barley cells. This suggests that methionine is limiting under these conditions and its presence is essential for development of mature appressoria which require melanin synthesis and cell wall differentiation to be functional. When considered together our results are consistent with MET13 encoding the major MTHFR activity in M. oryzae which plays a significant role in ensuring efficient methionine biosynthesis during the starvation conditions associated with pre-penetration development of appressoria from spores and during initial leaf tissue colonization. They also point to methionine being a critical amino acid during development of spores, perithecia and appressoria of the rice blast fungus. Methionine biosynthesis may therefore be valuable as a potential fungicide target given its pivotal nature in the initiation of plant infection.
Materials and Methods
Strains and growth conditions
All mutants described in the present study were generated from M. oryzae wild-type strain Guy11 (Table S1). Standard growth and storage procedures for fungal strains were performed, as described previously [32]. Escherichia coli strain DH-5α was used for routine bacterial transformations and maintenance of plasmids in this study.
Fungal growth, sporulation, appressorium formation and genetic crosses
Vegetative growth was assessed by measurement of colony diameter in plate cultures of M. oryzae grown on CM medium at 25°C for 10 d. Conidial development was assessed by harvesting conidia from the surface of 12-day-old plate cultures and determining the concentration of the resulting conidial suspension using a haemocytometer (Corning). Appressorium formation and penetration were measured on a hydrophobic coverslips and onion epidermis surfaces at 25°C for 24 h, respectively. The percentage of conidia formed appressoria or appressoria formed penetration pegs were determined by microscopic examination of at least 100 conidia or appressoria. Fertility assays were carried out by pairing Guy11 (MAT1-2) and other mutants with standard tester strain TH3 (MAT1-1) on oatmeal agar (OMA) plates, as described previously [28,29]. The junctions between the mated individuals were examined for the capacity to form perithecia. Each test was repeated at least three times.
Pathogenicity assays
Both cut-leaf and spraying methods were used for plant infection assays as described previously [30]. For cut-leaf assays, the mycelium plugs from 10-day old CM cultures were used to place onto leaf fragments of susceptible hosts: barley cv Golden Promise and rice cv CO-39. For rice seedling infection assays, conidia were harvested from the CM cultures with 1 mM methionine and conidial suspensions were diluted in 0.2% gelatin with 1 mM methionine solution to 1 × 105 conidia ml-1. The conidial suspensions were then used to spray seedlings of CO39. Plants were incubated for 5 days for disease symptom development.
Construction of vectors and fungal transformation
For the construction of the MET13 gene replacement vector, a 1.4 kb HPH gene cassette, which encodes hygromycin phosphotransferase under control of the A. nidulans TrpC promoter [43], was amplified with primers HPH-BF and HPH-BR (Table S2) using pCB1003 as a template. 1.1 kb flanking sequences on either border of the MET13 gene locus were amplified using primer pairs of WF1/WR2 and WF3/WR4 and cloned sequentially into pGEM-T easy vectors (Promega, Madison, WI, U.S.A.) to generate pGEM-13L and pGEM-13R, respectively. pGEM-13R was digested with BamHI and SpeI and the releasing fragment was inserted into pGEM-13L with the correspondent ends, leaving a single BamHI site for insertion of the HPH cassette with BamHI ends. The resulting construct vector, pMET13-KO, was linearized and transformed into M. oryzae Guy11 for generating homologous recombinants.
A similar strategy was used for the construction of the MET12 gene replacement vector, but the HPH gene was substituted with a BAR gene for transformant selection. A 0.94 kb BAR gene cassette, which encodes phosphinothricin acetyl transferase under control of the A. nidulans TrpC promoter, was amplified with primers Bar-KF and Bar-KR (Table S2) using pMLH21-bar [44] as a template, and cloned sequentially into pGEM-T easy vector to generate pGEM-KB. 1.1 kb flanking sequences on either border of the MET12 gene locus were amplified using primer pairs of WF5/WR6 and WF7/WR8 and cloned sequentially into pGEM-T easy vectors to generate pGEM-12L and pGEM-12R, respectively. pGEM-12R was digested with KpnI and SacI and the releasing fragment was inserted into pGEM-12L with the correspondent ends, leaving a single KpnI site for insertion of the BAR gene cassette with KpnI ends from pGEM-KB. The resulting construct vector, pMET12-KO, was linearized and transformed into M. oryzae Guy11 for generating homologous recombinants.
The MET13 complementation vector (C-terminal GFP tagging vector), pMET13-GFP, was constructed by amplification of a 3.3 kb fragment including the 2.0 kb MET13 gene-coding sequence and a 1.3 kb promoter region using primers 13F and 13R (Table S2) and by amplification of 1.5 kb fragment GFP allele [45] carrying the A. nidulans trpC terminator using primers GFP-13F and GFP-13R (Table S2). Construction of pMET13-GFP was carried out by cloning the 3.3 kb PCR product into pGEM-T easy vector to generate pGM-M13. The 1.5 kb GFP allele was then cloned to pGEM-T easy vector and digested with HindIII to release the GFP allele with HindIII ends, which was inserted at the HindIII site of pGM-M13 to create pGM-MET13-GFP. Finally, pGM-MET13-GFP was digested with EcoRI to release the MET13 C-terminal GFP tagging fragment, which was inserted into the EcoRI site of pCB1532, which contains the ILV1 allele conferring resistance to sulfonylurea [46] to give pMET13-GFP. The resulting plasmid was transformed into the Δmet13 mutant
(K56).
Double knockout Δmet13Δmet12 mutants were created by transformation of pMET13-KO into strain K12-7 (△met12) and were confirmed by PCR amplification (Figure S3A and F).
Nucleic acid manipulation, Southern blot analysis and quantitative RT-PCR
DNA extraction was performed as described previously [32], while general procedures for nucleic acid manipulation followed standard protocols [47]. Southern blot analysis was performed by the digoxigenin (DIG) high prime DNA labeling and detection starter Kit I (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). For quantitative RT-PCR, total RNA extraction, synthesis of the first strand cDNA, PCR amplification and relative gene expression were performed and calculated as described previously [28,30,48]. The primer pairs of RT-1F/ RT-2R and RT-3F/ RT-4R (Table S2) were used to determine the relative expression of MET13 and MET12, respectively. Expressions of the genes involved in methionine metabolism were analyzed with the corresponding primers listed in Table S2. M. oryzae beta-tubulin gene (MGG_00604.6) amplified with the primer pairs of BT-F/BT-R was used as an endogenous control. All qRT-PCR reactions were repeated three times.
Supporting Information
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (2012CB114002), by Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT0943), by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31071648) and the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20100101110097) to ZW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Raymond RK, Kastanos EK, Appling DR (1999) Saccharomyces cerevisiae expresses two genes encoding isozymes of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Arch Biochem Biophys 372: 300-308. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1498. PubMed: 10600168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Shan X, Wang L, Hoffmaster R, Kruger WD (1999) Functional characterization of human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . J Biol Chem 274(46): 32613-32618. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.46.32613. PubMed: 10551815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Goyette P, Pai A, Milos R, Frosst P, Tran P et al. (1998) Gene structure of human and mouse methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). Mamm Genome 9(8): 652-656. doi: 10.1007/s003359900838. PubMed: 9680386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Roje S, Wang H, McNeil SD, Raymond RK, Appling DR et al. (1999) Isolation, characterization, and functional expression of cDNAs encoding NADH-dependent methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase from higher plants. J Biol Chem 274(51): 36089-36096. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36089. PubMed: 10593891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sheppard CA, Trimmer EE, Matthews RG (1999) Purification and properties of NADH-dependent 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MetF) from Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 181(3): 718-725. PubMed: 9922232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Naula N, Walther C, Baumann D, Schweingruber ME (2002) Two non-complementing genes encoding enzymatically active methylenetetrahydrofolate reductases control methionine requirement in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe . Yeast 19: 841-848. doi: 10.1002/yea.877. PubMed: 12112238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sieńko M, Natorff R, Zieliński Z, Hejduk A, Paszewski A (2007) Two Aspergillus nidulans genes encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate reductases are up-regulated by homocysteine. Fungal Genet Biol 44(7): 691-700. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.12.002. PubMed: 17257865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Frandsen RJ, Albertsen KS, Stougaard P, Sørensen JL, Nielsen KF et al. (2010) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase activity is involved in the plasma membrane redox system required for pigment biosynthesis in filamentous fungi. Eukaryot Cell 9(8): 1225-1235. doi: 10.1128/EC.00031-10. PubMed: 20543064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ou SH (1985) Rice diseases. 2nd ed. Commonw. Mycol: Inst., Surrey, UK. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Howard RJ, Ferrari MA, Roach DH, Money NP (1991) Penetration of hard substrates by a fungus employing enormous turgor pressures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 11281-11284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11281. PubMed: 1837147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Valent B (1990) Rice blast as a model system for plant pathology. Phytopathology 80: 33-36. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-80-33. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Talbot NJ (1995) Having a blast: exploring the pathogenicity of Magnaporthe grisea . Trends Microbiol 3: 9-16. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)88862-9. PubMed: 7719639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Howard RJ, Valent B (1996) Breaking and entering host penetration by the fungal rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea . Annu Rev Microbiol 50: 491-512. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.491. PubMed: 8905089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Talbot NJ (2003) On the trail of a cereal killer: exploring the biology of Magnaporthe grisea . Annu Rev Microbiol 57: 177-202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090957. PubMed: 14527276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ebbole DJ (2007) Magnaporthe as a model for understanding host-pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45: 437-456. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094346. PubMed: 17489691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wilson RA, Talbot NJ (2009) Under pressure: investigating the biology of plant infection by Magnaporthe oryzae . Nat Rev Microbiol 7(3): 185-195. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2032. PubMed: 19219052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Li GT, Zhou XY, Xu JR (2012) Genetic control of infection-related development in Magnaporthe oryzae . Curr Opin Micribiol 15: 678-684. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.09.004. PubMed: 23085322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Caracuel-Rios Z, Talbot NJ (2007) Cellular differentiation and host invasion by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea . Curr Opin Microbiol 10(4): 339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.05.019. PubMed: 17707684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gilbert MJ, Thornton CR, Wakley GE, Talbot NJ (2006) A P-type ATPase required for rice blast disease and induction of host resistance. Nature 440(7083): 535-539. doi: 10.1038/nature04567. PubMed: 16554820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Yi M, Chi MH, Khang CH, Park SY, Kang S et al. (2009) The ER chaperone LHS1 is involved in asexual development and rice infection by the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . Plant Cell 21(2): 681-695. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.055988. PubMed: 19252083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chen J, Zheng W, Zheng S, Zhang D, Sang W et al. (2008) Rac1 is required for pathogenicity and Chm1-dependent conidiogenesis in rice fungal pathogen Magnaporthe grisea . PLOS Pathog 4(11): e1000202 PubMed: 19008945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ding SL, Liu W, Iliuk A, Ribot C, Vallet J et al. (2010) The tig1 histone deacetylase complex regulates infectious growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . Plant Cell 22(7): 2495-2508. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.074302. PubMed: 20675574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Veneault-Fourrey C, Barooah M, Egan M, Wakley G, Talbot NJ (2006) Autophagic fungal cell death is necessary for infection by the rice blast fungus. Science 312(5773): 580-583. doi: 10.1126/science.1124550. PubMed: 16645096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guo M, Chen Y, Du Y, Dong Y, Guo W et al. (2011) The bZIP transcription factor MoAP1 mediates the oxidative stress response and is critical for pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . PLOS Pathog 7(2): e1001302 PubMed: 21383978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kim S, Park SY, Kim KS, Rho HS, Chi MH et al. (2009) Homeobox transcription factors are required for conidiation and appressorium development in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . PLOS Genet 5(12): e1000757 PubMed: 19997500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kong LA, Yang J, Li GT, Qi LL, Zhang YJ et al. (2012) Different chitin synthase genes are required for various developmental and plant infection processes in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . PLOS Pathog 8(2): e1002526 PubMed: 22346755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dagdas YF, Yoshino K, Dagdas G, Ryder LS, Bielska E et al. (2012) Septin-mediated plant cell invasion by the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae . Science 336(6088): 1590-1595. doi: 10.1126/science.1222934. PubMed: 22723425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Li Y, Liang S, Yan X, Wang H, Li DB et al. (2010) Characterization of MoLDB1 required for vegetative growth, infection-related morphogenesis, and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23(10): 1260-1274. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-03-10-0052. PubMed: 20831406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Li Y, Yan X, Wang H, Liang S, Ma WB et al. (2010) MoRic8 is a novel component of G-protein signaling during plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23(3): 317-331. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-3-0317. PubMed: 20121453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yan X, Li Y, Yue XF, Wang CC, Que YW et al. (2011) Two novel transcriptional regulators are essential for infection-related morphogenesis and pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae . PLOS Pathog 7(12): e1002385 PubMed: 22144889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Leung H, Borromeo ES, Bernardo MA, Notteghem JL (1988) Genetic analysis of virulence in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea . Phytopathology 78: 1227-1233. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-78-1227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Hamer JE (1993) Identification and characterization of MPG1, a gene involved in pathogenicity from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea . Plant Cell 5: 1575-1590. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.11.1575. PubMed: 8312740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Liu YG, Chen Y (2007) High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR for amplification of unknown flanking sequences. BioTechniques 43: 649-650. doi: 10.2144/000112601. PubMed: 18072594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dean RA, Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Farman ML, Mitchell TK et al. (2005) The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea . Nature 434: 980-986. doi: 10.1038/nature03449. PubMed: 15846337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Dixon KP, Xu JR, Smirnoff N, Talbot NJ (1999) Independent signaling pathways regulate cellular turgor during hyperosmotic stress and appressorium-mediated plant infection by Magnaporthe grisea . Plant Cell 11: 2045-2058. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.10.2045. PubMed: 10521531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Vickers TJ, Orsomando G, de la Garza RD, Scott DA, Kang SO et al. (2006) Biochemical and genetic analysis of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in Leishmania metabolism and virulence. J Biol Chem 281(50): 38150-38158. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608387200. PubMed: 17032644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Malz S, Grell MN, Thrane C, Maier FJ, Rosager P et al. (2005) Identification of a gene cluster responsible for the biosynthesis of aurofusarin in the Fusarium graminearum species complex. Fungal Genet Biol 42: 420-433. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.01.010. PubMed: 15809006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Seong K, Hou Z, Tracy M, Kistler HC, Xu JR (2005) Random insertional mutagenesis identifies genes associated with virulence in the wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum . Phytopathology 95(7): 744-750. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-95-0744. PubMed: 18943005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Fu J, Wu J, Jiang J, Wang Z, Ma Z (2013) Cystathionine gamma-synthase is essential for methionine biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum . Fungal Biol 117(1): 13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.11.001. PubMed: 23332829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Balhadère PV, Foster AJ, Talbot NJ (1999) Identification of pathogenicity mutants of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea by insertional mutagenesis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 12: 129-142. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.2.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lo SC, Hamer L, Hamer JE (2002) Molecular characterization of a cystathionine beta-synthase gene, CBS1, in Magnaporthe grisea . Eukaryot Cell 1(2): 311-314. doi: 10.1128/EC.1.2.311-314.2002. PubMed: 12455965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wilson RA, Fernandez J, Quispe CF, Gradnigo J, Seng A et al. (2012) Towards defining nutrient conditions encountered by the rice blast fungus during host infection. PLOS ONE 7(10): e47392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047392. PubMed: 23071797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Carroll AM, Sweigard JA, Valent B (1994) Improved vectors for selecting resistance to hygromycin. Fungal Genet Newsl 41: 22. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Maggio-Hall LA, Keller NP (2004) Mitochondrial β-oxidation in Aspergillus nidulans . Mol Microbiol 54: 1173-1185. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04340.x. PubMed: 15554960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chiu WL, Niwa Y, Zeng W, Hirano T, Kobayashi H et al. (1996) Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr Biol 6: 325-330. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00483-9. PubMed: 8805250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sweigard JA, Carroll AM, Farrall L, Valent B (1997) A series of vectors for fungal transformation. Fungal Genet Newslett 44: 52-53. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402-408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. PubMed: 11846609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.