Most chondrosarcoma patients exhibit gain-of-function mutations in either IDH1 or IDH2. Lu et al. found that IDH mutations were associated with DNA hypermethylation at CpG islands in chondrosarcoma biopsies. Regions of hypermethylation were enriched for genes implicated in stem cell maintenance/differentiation and lineage specification. In murine mesenchymal progenitor cells, mutant IDH2 led to DNA hypermethylation and impairment in differentiation, which could be reversed by DNA-hypomethylating agents. Mutant IDH2 also generated undifferentiated sarcomas in vivo. This work demonstrates that neomorphic IDH2 mutations can be oncogenic in mesenchymal cells.
Keywords: isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, 2-hydroxyglutarate, differentiation, contact inhibition, tumorigenesis, DNA methylation, chondrosarcoma
Abstract
More than 50% of patients with chondrosarcomas exhibit gain-of-function mutations in either isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or IDH2. In this study, we performed genome-wide CpG methylation sequencing of chondrosarcoma biopsies and found that IDH mutations were associated with DNA hypermethylation at CpG islands but not other genomic regions. Regions of CpG island hypermethylation were enriched for genes implicated in stem cell maintenance/differentiation and lineage specification. In murine 10T1/2 mesenchymal progenitor cells, expression of mutant IDH2 led to DNA hypermethylation and an impairment in differentiation that could be reversed by treatment with DNA-hypomethylating agents. Introduction of mutant IDH2 also induced loss of contact inhibition and generated undifferentiated sarcomas in vivo. The oncogenic potential of mutant IDH2 correlated with the ability to produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Together, these data demonstrate that neomorphic IDH2 mutations can be oncogenic in mesenchymal cells.
Nearly a century after Warburg (1956) observed that cancer cells metabolize glucose differently from quiescent tissues, the recent resurgence in cancer metabolism research has led to the increasing appreciation that metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer (Vander Heiden et al. 2009; Ward and Thompson 2012). However, it remains controversial whether metabolic reprogramming plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of cancer. An argument in support of this hypothesis is the identification of cancer-associated germline and somatic alterations of genes encoding for metabolic enzymes (Mullarky et al. 2011; Oermann et al. 2012), including the recent discovery of prevalent mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2.
Cytosolic IDH1 and mitochondrial IDH2 are NADP+-dependent enzymes that metabolize isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (αKG). Frequent somatic mutations of IDH1 and IDH2 were initially identified in ∼80% of intermediate-grade gliomas (Yan et al. 2009) and ∼20% of de novo acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) (Mardis et al. 2009; Ward et al. 2010). More recently, they were also found in more than half of patients with chondrosarcomas (Amary et al. 2011a) and skeletal disorders characterized by cartilage tumors (Amary et al. 2011b; Pansuriya et al. 2011). Almost all mutations observed in IDH1 and IDH2 are monoallelic point mutations affecting only a few residues, suggesting that they are unlikely to be loss of function. Indeed, metabolomic and biochemical analysis revealed that mutant IDH enzymes gain a neomorphic activity of producing 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) from αKG (Dang et al. 2009; Ward et al. 2010). 2HG is normally present at very low levels in cells but exhibits a >100-fold increase in tumor samples with IDH mutations. It is believed that IDH mutations promote tumorigenesis through accumulating the putative “oncometabolite” 2HG.
At the molecular level, mounting evidence implicates a link between IDH mutation and epigenetic dysregulation. In hematologic tumors and gliomas, IDH mutations are associated with a DNA hypermethylation profile and a gene expression pattern associated with lineage-specific progenitors (Figueroa et al. 2010; Noushmehr et al. 2010; Turcan et al. 2012). Mechanistically, mutant IDH was shown to impair activities of αKG-dependent chromatin-modifying enzymes by producing 2HG as a competitive inhibitor. These include TET family enzymes, which convert 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), a novel epigenetic mark potentially involved in DNA demethylation (Figueroa et al. 2010). Similarly, 2HG-producing IDH mutation inhibits activities of αKG-dependent Jumonji-C histone demethylases and leads to increased methylation at certain histone lysine residues (Chowdhury et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2011; Lu et al. 2012).
Although the high frequencies of IDH mutations in cancer imply that they are potential “driver” mutations, in vitro and in vivo modeling of IDH mutations has yet to report overt cellular transformation. Introduction of a mutant IDH1 allele as either a transgene or knock-in into hematopoietic cells, neural progenitors, or immortalized cell lines has failed to produce tumors in vivo (Sasaki et al. 2012b; Turcan et al. 2012). To date, the properties of IDH mutant tumors of mesenchymal origin have not been characterized, and the role of IDH mutations in the tumorigenesis of such cells has not been examined. As in other tumor types, we now report that IDH mutation is associated with extensive changes in DNA methylation that are enriched at promoter CpG islands of genes implicated in the regulation of cellular differentiation. Similar changes were observed when an IDH2 mutant allele was introduced into immortalized mesenchymal cells. Furthermore, in such cells, expression of mutant IDH2 leads to impaired mesenchymal lineage differentiation and loss of contact inhibition in vitro and formation of mesenchymal tumors in vivo. Abolishing 2HG-producing activity from mutant IDH2 eliminates its transformation capacity. Collectively, the data presented here demonstrate that the 2HG-producing IDH2 mutation can directly induce tumor formation in vivo.
Results
Genome-wide DNA methylation landscape of IDH mutant chondrosarcomas
A panel of snap-frozen surgical specimens from 21 patients with chondrosarcomas was collected through an institutional review board-approved protocol. Targeted sequencing results revealed an ∼50% frequency of IDH mutations in chondrosarcomas (seven of the samples had the R132 IDH1 mutation, three had the R172 IDH2 mutation, and 11 were wild type for IDH1/2), consistent with previous reports (Amary et al. 2011a; Pansuriya et al. 2011; Arai et al. 2012). Compared with samples that were wild type for IDH1/2, IDH1 or IDH2 mutant samples showed a significant increase in intratumoral 2HG levels (Fig. 1A).
Genome-wide DNA methylation levels were measured using enhanced reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (ERRBS), which was previously demonstrated to provide base-pair resolution DNA methylation information and extended genomic coverage beyond CpG island regions compared with traditional RRBS (Akalin et al. 2012a). A minimum cutoff of 40% methylation difference, in addition to statistical significance (Q < 0.01), was required to identify differentially methylated CpGs between IDH1/2 wild-type and mutant samples. A total of 12,236 CpGs were found to be differentially methylated.
Individual CpG sites were next annotated to CpG islands, shores, or regions beyond CpG shores. The results showed that IDH1/2 mutations were associated with DNA hypermethylation at CpG islands (77% of differentially methylated CpGs were hypermethylated in IDH1/2 mutant samples) (Fig. 1B,C). In contrast, a minority of CpG shores and other regions (29% and 3%, respectively) displayed increased methylation in IDH mutant samples.
Analysis of DNA methylation at gene promoters was performed by selecting differentially methylated CpGs at −1000 to +500 base pairs (bp) of each transcription start site. The group of genes that were promoter DNA-hypermethylated in IDH mutant chondrosarcomas was then subjected to Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) analysis to examine their functional relevance. The results showed that the top enriched functional categories were involved in various organismal and cellular developmental processes (Supplemental Fig. S1; Supplemental Table S1). In addition, the most significantly hypermethylated genes in IDH mutant samples include lineage specification regulators such as retinoic acid receptor α (RARA), platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA), and BCL6 corepressor (BCOR) (Supplemental Table S2). Taken together, these data provide a comprehensive genome-wide DNA methylation landscape of IDH mutant chondrosarcomas and suggest that IDH mutations are associated with epigenetic dysregulation of genes implicated in the regulation of stem cell maintenance/differentiation and cell lineage specification.
IDH2 mutation induces DNA hypermethylation
To establish the causality between IDH mutation and aberrant DNA methylation, the DNA methylome between isogenic cell lines expressing wild-type or mutant IDH was compared. In contrast to others, we chose to examine the role of chondrosarcoma-associated mitochondrial IDH2 mutants. Unlike cytosolic IDH1 R132 mutants, mitochondrial IDH2 R172 mutants generate high levels of their neomorphic product, 2HG, independently of the action of wild-type enzymes (Ward et al. 2013). We retrovirally transduced 10T1/2 (10T) cells with vectors containing either wild-type or R172K mutant IDH2. 10T cells expressing R172K mutant IDH2 but not empty vector or wild-type IDH2 showed significant accumulation of 2HG (Supplemental Fig. S2).
Genomic DNA of 10T cells was extracted and processed for ERRBS to generate highly reproducible base-pair resolution DNA methylation profiles (Supplemental Fig. S3A). In agreement with results from chondrosarcoma biopsies, IDH2 R172K mutant cells compared with wild-type cells showed a profound DNA hypermethylation at CpG islands across all chromosomes (Fig. 2A). In contrast, significantly less differentially methylated CpGs were observed between wild-type IDH2 and vector cells, with even distribution of hypermethylated and hypomethylated sites (Fig. 2A). Increased methylation at several histone marks, such as H3K9me3, H3K9me2, and H3K4me3, was also found in IDH2 R172K mutant cells, which could reinforce with DNA methylation to modulate gene expression (Supplemental Fig. S3B).
In total, there were 2400 genes with differentially methylated CpGs at their promoters, and a predominance in DNA hypermethylation was observed when comparing the IDH2 R172K mutant with wild-type cells (78.1% being hypermethylated, P-value < 0.0001) (Supplemental Table S3). To gain more insights into the mechanism of aberrant DNA methylation, the group of genes that were promoter DNA-hypermethylated in IDH2 R172K mutant cells was subjected to gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) with the Broad Institute Molecular Signatures Database (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp), which includes >3000 curated gene sets collected from various research sources. The top four most statistically significantly enriched gene sets were Polycomb-repressive complex 2 (PRC2) target genes or genes marked by H3K27me3 in embryonic stem cells (Fig. 2B; Supplemental Table S4). Notably, recent genome-wide mapping of Tet1-binding sites revealed that >95% of PRC2 target genes were bound by Tet1 (Wu and Zhang 2011), and Tet1 has been proposed as a guardian to protect these regions from accidental DNA methylation (Williams et al. 2012). Taken together, the DNA methylome analysis suggests that acquisition of an IDH2 R172 mutation is sufficient to establish DNA hypermethylation, the pattern of which matches the patterns of Tet1- and PRC2-binding activity.
Mutant IDH2 inhibits mesenchymal lineage differentiation
10T cells were originally isolated from C3H mouse embryos. They were demonstrated to be multipotent, with the ability to differentiate into several mesenchymal lineages, including adipocytes, myoblasts, and chondrocytes (Taylor and Jones 1979). Since the DNA methylation signature associated with IDH mutant chondrosarcomas was enriched for stem cell maintenance and differentiation genes, the effects of IDH2 mutation on the mesenchymal differentiation potential of 10T cells were determined. Expression of R172K mutant IDH2 in 10T cells led to a profound impairment in either adipocyte or chondrocyte differentiation. Compared with vector and wild-type IDH2 cells, IDH2 R172K mutant cells showed no visible accumulation of lipid droplets and failed to express mature adipocyte markers (Adipoq and Fabp4) after adipocyte differentiation induction (Fig. 3A). Similarly, when cells were subjected to conditions that promote chondrocyte differentiation, morphological conversion to rounded shapes resembling mature chondrocytes and expression of mature chondrocyte markers (Acan and Col2a1) were only observed in vector and wild-type IDH2 cells, while IDH2 R172K mutant cells maintained a fibroblast-like undifferentiated state (Fig. 3B). Notably, overexpression of wild-type IDH2 enzyme led to enhanced expression of mature chondrocyte markers, suggesting that increased production of NADPH and αKG may promote cellular differentiation. Furthermore, while vector and wild-type IDH2 cells became proliferation-arrested after the induction of adipocyte or chondrocyte differentiation, the proliferation rate of IDH2 R172K mutant cells remained largely unaffected (Fig. 3C). IDH2 R172K mutant cells were also able to maintain cyclin D1 levels after differentiation induction, unlike vector and wild-type IDH2 cells (Fig. 3D).
Differentiation impairment by mutant IDH2 correlates with high levels of 2HG accumulation
We previously demonstrated that a rare mutation in IDH1 (A134D) identified in thyroid cancers abolished the catalytic activity of the enzyme (Ward et al. 2012). To determine whether the 2HG-producing activity is required for R172K mutant IDH2 to inhibit differentiation, a similar mutation was introduced to the analogous residue in IDH2 (A174D), which is predicted to interfere with the substrate binding of R172 and eliminate the enzymatic activity of R172K mutant IDH2 (Fig. 4A). Indeed, 2HG levels in 10T cells stably expressing R172K/A174D mutant IDH2 were comparable with vector and wild-type IDH2 cells (Fig. 4B). 10T cells stably expressing R140Q mutant IDH2 were also generated. R140Q mutation in IDH2 is only found in hematological malignancies and was shown to be a weak 2HG-producing mutant (Ward et al. 2013). In 10T cells, expression of R140Q mutant IDH2 increased 2HG levels by fivefold, while R172K mutant IDH2 increased 2HG levels by >100-fold (Fig. 4B). When cells were tested for their differentiation potentials, the A174D mutation was found to abolish R172K mutant IDH2's ability to block adipocyte or chondrocyte differentiation (Fig. 4C). Similarly, weak 2HG-producing R140Q mutant IDH2 did not result in any differentiation impairment.
DNA-hypomethylating treatment reverses differentiation block by mutant IDH2
To functionally link DNA hypermethylation to differentiation impairment, IDH2 R172K mutant cells were treated with 5-azacytidine (5-aza) to test whether inhibiting DNA methyltransferase had any effect on reversing the differentiation inhibition by mutant IDH2. After treatment with low doses of 5-aza for 48 h to induce global DNA demethylation (Supplemental Fig. S4), IDH2 R172K mutant cells were allowed to proliferate in the absence of 5-aza until reaching confluence before being subjected to adipocyte differentiation induction. Compared with untreated cells, a transient exposure to 5-aza led to the accumulation of lipid droplets and a dose-dependent increase in the expression of mature adipocyte markers (fabp4 and adipoq) after 8 d of differentiation induction (Fig. 5A,B), suggesting that IDH2 R172K mutant cells' differentiation potential can be restored upon treatment with a DNA-hypomethylating agent.
IDH2 mutant cells escape contact inhibition
In addition to mesenchymal multipotency, 10T cells are sensitive to confluence-induced proliferation arrest and show no tumorigenicity in xenograft studies (Reznikoff et al. 1973). However, the differentiation experiments described above require cells to be seeded at confluence before induction. Therefore, the findings that IDH2 R172K mutant cells were able to continue proliferation at post-confluence (Fig. 3C,D) prompted us to investigate whether these cells, in addition to differentiation impairment, have acquired resistance to contact inhibition. When cultured in normal growth medium, vector, wild-type IDH2, or IDH2 R172K mutant cells showed no difference in proliferation rate when cells were sparse (days 0–2) (Fig. 6A). However, while vector and wild-type IDH2 cells stopped proliferating shortly after reaching confluence (days 2–6), the accumulation of IDH2 R172K mutant cells continued even after confluence was achieved. Measurement of cell mitotic activity by detection of the incorporation of nucleoside analog 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) also revealed that IDH2 R172K mutant cells were more mitotically active at post-confluence (Fig. 6B). Moreover, compared with vector and wild-type IDH2 cells, the induction of the cell cycle inhibitor p27 and the decrease in cyclin D1 levels after contact inhibition were less pronounced in IDH2 R172K mutant cells (Fig. 6C). These features were not observed in IDH2 R172K/A174D or R140Q mutant cells (Fig. 6D), suggesting that loss of contact inhibition induced by mutant IDH2 requires high levels of 2HG production.
IDH2 R172K mutant cells underwent cell cycle arrest normally after serum deprivation (Supplemental Fig. S5A), suggesting that their escape from contact inhibition is unlikely to be due to defects in cell cycle regulation. The cadherins are critical components of cell–cell adhesion and have been proposed as the main upstream mediator of contact inhibition (Gumbiner 2005). Unlike vector and wild-type IDH2 cells, IDH2 R172K mutant cells failed to up-regulate N-cadherin protein and mRNA expression after reaching confluence (Fig. 6E), suggesting that the post-confluence growth of these cells results from the inability to sense cell–cell contact at the surface membrane. This may be at least in part due to epigenetic gene silencing, as two cell adhesion genes (Itga9 and cntn1) that were DNA-hypermethylated in IDH2 R172K mutant cells (Supplemental Table S3) failed to increase their mRNA expression upon cell–cell contact (Supplemental Fig. S5B).
IDH2 mutant cells generate poorly differentiated sarcomas in vivo
Given the malignant phenotypes of differentiation blockade and loss of contact inhibition observed in vitro, xenograft studies were performed to test whether 10T cells with IDH2 mutation could generate tumors in vivo. IDH2 R172K mutant cells formed palpable tumors 20 d after subcutaneous injection and continued to grow up to 1000 mm3, while vector and wild-type IDH2 cells showed no tumorigenicity over the course of study (Fig. 7A). Immunohistochemistry staining revealed that these tumors resembled poorly differentiated sarcomas with a high Ki67 index (Fig. 7B). Consistent with in vitro studies, these tumors also had high levels of cyclin D1, low p27 expression (Fig. 7B), and no detectable staining for mature mesenchymal lineage markers (data not shown). Tumors from IDH2 R172K mutant cells showed 2HG levels that were comparable with cells cultured in vitro (Fig. 7C), and IDH2 R172K/A174D or R140Q mutant cells failed to induce xenograft growth (Fig. 7D).
Discussion
The study of IDH mutations in carcinogenesis has been hampered by a lack of robust model systems. We previously found that IDH mutation blocked adipocyte differentiation from 3T3-L1 murine fibroblasts (Lu et al. 2012). This finding has been extended to the hematopoietic system with the observations that mutant IDH and 2HG could impair EPO-induced erythrocyte differentiation in an erythroleukemic cell line (Losman et al. 2013) and that hematopoietic conditional knock-in IDH1 mutant mice had an expansion in early progenitor/stem cell population (Sasaki et al. 2012b). Nevertheless, none of the previous studies reported in vivo tumorigenicity as a result of the presence of mutant IDH. We report here that, using a nontransformed mesenchymal multipotent cell line, expression of an IDH2 mutant enzyme producing high levels of 2HG not only arrested cells from differentiating into adipocytic and chondrocytic lineages, but also resulted in loss of contact inhibition and tumor formation in vivo. It is noteworthy that 10T cells have been frequently used as an in vitro model to test the carcinogenic potential of chemicals in mesenchymal cells (for review, see Schechtman 2012). While it is possible that pre-existing genetic and epigenetic alterations in 10T cells render them more susceptible to 2HG-induced transformation, the in vivo tumorigenicity established here depends on the introduction of a 2HG-producing IDH2 R172K mutant transgene. The morphology of the mutant IDH2-induced 10T tumors in vivo resembles that of human chondrosarcomas in which the block to cartilage formation becomes more pronounced as the tumor progresses. This is consistent with the in vitro impairment in cell differentiation exhibited by 10T cells expressing a chondrosarcoma-associated IDH2 R172K mutant enzyme.
As a common product of recurrent cancer-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, 2HG is believed to mediate mutant IDH's tumor-promoting potential. We and others have shown that exogenous 2HG could recapitulate mutant IDH's effect on blocking cell differentiation (Lu et al. 2012; Losman et al. 2013). In the present study, we further demonstrate that high levels of 2HG production were required for mutant IDH2's transformation capacity. Therefore, it appears that enzymatic activity is necessary for oncogenesis by mutant IDH. It should be noted that the truncated reverse reaction catalyzed by mutant IDH also consumes NADPH. Since the R172K/A174D mutant IDH2 was enzymatically inactive, our experiments do not rule out the possibility that NADPH consumption and the resulting generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also important for mutant IDH's oncogenic mechanism. However, since IDH mutations in cancer are monoallelic and the reverse reaction by mutant IDH occurs at a much slower rate compared with the forward reaction by the wild-type enzyme (Dang et al. 2009), the mutation's impact on the total cellular NADPH pool is likely to be minimal. In agreement, studies have shown that the intracellular ROS levels actually decrease as a result of mutant IDH expression (Sasaki et al. 2012a; Li et al. 2013).
In agreement with previous findings in other tumor types, quantitative profiling of genome-wide DNA methylation using ERRBS revealed a significant increase in CpG island methylation in IDH mutant chondrosarcoma samples. Such association is unlikely to result from the disparate cells of origin affected by IDH mutations, as the expression of the IDH2 R172K mutant in 10T cells was sufficient to cause CpG island DNA hypermethylation. GSEA showed a remarkable overlap between R172K mutant IDH2-associated promoter-hypermethylated genes and PRC2 target/Tet1-bound genes in embryonic stem cells. Since other cell types, including mesenchymal progenitor cells, show a similar PRC2 target preference (Bracken et al. 2006; Squazzo et al. 2006), our results suggest that the establishment of DNA hypermethylation by mutant IDH2 in 10T cells may be the result of TET inhibition. Importantly, functional analysis and validation experiments implicate that aberrant promoter DNA methylation may underlie the inability to regulate the expression of genes important for differentiation and cell–cell contact. Consistent with this notion, we showed that low-dose pulsing of 5-aza, which has been shown to exert durable anti-tumor activities (Tsai et al. 2012), was sufficient to reverse the differentiation defect of IDH2 mutant cells. Therefore, IDH mutation may initiate and promote tumorigenesis by epigenetically “locking” a proliferative progenitor cell in that state.
Recently, inhibitors that specifically abrogate mutant IDH's ability to produce 2HG have been developed (Wang et al. 2013). It was shown that the inhibitors could induce differentiation, delay xenograft growth, and reverse histone hypermethylation in tumor cells containing ectopic or endogenous mutant IDH (Rohle et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2013), suggesting that some of the epigenetic abnormalities are potentially correctable. To date, no inhibitors of 2HG production by the chondrosarcoma-associated IDH2 R172 mutation studied here have been reported. However, given 2HG's remarkable impact on the epigenome, it would be interesting to test whether compounds targeting chromatin modifiers are selectively toxic to tumors with an IDH mutation.
Materials and methods
Chondrosarcoma patient samples and ERRBS analysis
Acquisition of snap-frozen surgical tumor specimens from patients with chondrosarcomas was carried out through a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center institutional review board-approved protocol. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) (Sequenom) platform was used to identify IDH1/2 mutations. ERRBS was performed with genomic DNA extracted from 10T cells or chondrosarcoma biopsies as previously described (Akalin et al. 2012a). The ERRBS raw data were aligned to the whole genome, and the methylation was called using the epigenetic core pipeline at Weill Cornell Medical School. The differential methylated CpGs were identified with the methylKit R package (Akalin et al. 2012b). The data were processed and plotted using R script. The two-dimensional (2D) hierarchical clustering of 21 chondrosarcoma samples was performed using the heat map function in R 2.15.1 (http://www.r-project.org) with 1-Pearson correlation distance and Ward's agglomeration method. The ERRBS data have been deposited in the NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no. GSE50539).
GSEA
Gene sets from the Broad Institute Molecular Signatures Database (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp) were used. The overrepresentation of gene sets in the gene list was done using hypergeometric calculation implemented in the GOstats Bioconductor package (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GOstats.html) in R statistical language (http://www.r-project.org). Gene ontology analysis was performed with the online software DAVID on functional analysis of gene lists (Huang et al. 2009).
Plasmid construction
The cDNA clone of human IDH2 (BC009244) was purchased from Invitrogen in pOTB7. Standard site-directed mutagenesis techniques were used to make IDH2 R172K by introducing a g515a change in the IDH2 ORF. Wild-type and mutant sequences were then subcloned into the LPC vector, and IDH2 R172K/A174D was made by introducing a c521a change in the ORF of the LPC-IDH2 R172K construct. All sequences were confirmed by direct sequencing before retrovirus generation.
Cell culture, transfection/transduction, and generation of stable cell lines
C3H10T1/2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; CellGro). To generate 10T cell lines with stable expression of wild-type or mutant IDH2, supernatant from 293T cells transfected with pCL-Eco helper virus and plasmids was collected after 72 h, filtered, and applied to 10T parental cells overnight. Pooled populations of puromycin-resistant cells were obtained by growing cells in 2.5 μg/mL puromycin for 7 d following retroviral transduction and then continuously culturing in puromycin.
10T cell differentiation
Adipocyte differentiation of 10T cells was done following the same procedure as 3T3-L1 cell differentiation previously described (Wellen et al. 2009). In brief, confluent 10T cells were stimulated with a cocktail containing 0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine, 1 μM dexamethasone, 5 μg/mL insulin, and 5 μM troglitazone (all from Sigma) in DMEM with 10% FBS to induce differentiation. Cells were maintained in DMEM with insulin after 2 d of differentiation until they were ready to be harvested. Chondrocyte differentiation of 10T cells was performed as previously described (Mikami et al. 2011). In brief, confluent 10T cells were stimulated with a cocktail containing DMEM with 1% FBS, 10 μg/mL human insulin (Sigma), 3 × 10−8 M sodium selenite (Sigma), 10 μg/mL human transferrin (Sigma), 10−8 M dexamethasone, and 100 ng/mL rhBMP-2 (R&D Systems). Medium was replaced with fresh cocktail every 2–3 d until cells were ready to be imaged or harvested.
Histone extraction and Western blotting
For histone acid extraction, cells were lysed in hypotonic lysis buffer (10 mM HEPES, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, protease inhibitors) for 1 h. H2SO4 was added to 0.2 N followed by overnight rotation at 4°C. After centrifugation, supernatants were collected, and proteins were precipitated in 33% TCA, washed with acetone, and resuspended in deionized water. For whole-cell lysates, cells were lysed in standard RIPA buffer (1% NaDOC, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 0.01 M Tris at pH 8.0, 0.14 M NaCl), and lysates were then sonicated and centrifuged at 14,000g at 4°C. Supernatants were collected and normalized for total protein concentration, separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, blocked in 5% nonfat milk in PBS plus 0.5% Tween 20, probed with primary antibodies, and detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare, NA934V and NA931V). The primary antibodies used include anti-IDH2 (Abcam, ab55271), anti-H3K9me2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9753), anti-H3K9me3 (Active Motif, 39765), anti-H3K36me3 (Abcam, ab9050), anti-H3K27me3 (Millipore, 07-449), anti-H3K4me3 (Active Motif, 39916), anti-H3K79me2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9757), anti-acetyl H3 (Upstate Biotechnology, 06-599), anti-H3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4499), anti-tubulin (Sigma, T9026), anti-cyclin D1 (EMD Millipore, CC12), anti-p27 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-1641), anti-N-cadherin (Cell Signaling Tech, 4061).
Metabolite extraction and gas chromatography (GC)-MS analysis
Frozen chondrosarcoma tissue (30–60 mg) or 10T cells were homogenized in 1.2 mL of ice-cold 80% methanol containing 20 μM deuterated 2HG as an internal standard (D-hydroxyglutaric-2,3,3,4,4-d5) using a tissue homogenizer (Omni International). Methanol extracts were incubated for 30 min at −80°C and centrifuged at 21,000g for 20 min at 4°C to remove precipitated protein. Five-hundred microliters of extracts was evaporated to dryness under a nitrogen gas stream. Dried organic acids were derivatized by the addition of 20 μL of 40 mg/mL methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine with incubation for 90 min at 30°C followed by 80 μL of MSTFA + 1% TMCS (Thermo Scientific) with incubation for 30 min at 37°C. One microliter of the trimethylsilyl-derivatized organic acids was analyzed by GC-MS using an Agilent 7890A GC equipped with an HP-5MS capillary column and connected to an Agilent 5975 C mass selective detector operating in splitless mode with electron impact ionization. Relative quantification of 2HG was determined from extracted ion chromatograms for 2HG (m/z: 349) normalized to either the d5-2HG internal standard (m/z: 354) or citrate (m/z: 465) and corrected by wet weight of tissue sample or cell numbers.
Cell proliferation and cell cycle analysis
EdU incorporation assay was performed using the Click-iT EdU flow cytometry assay kit (Invitrogen, C10425) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, 10T cells at sparse or post-confluence were incubated with 10 μM EdU for 4 h. Cells were then trypsinized, washed with PBS, and fixed for 15 min at room temperature. After fixation, cells were washed with PBS and incubated in permeabilization buffer containing CuSO4 and Alexa Fluor 448 azide for 30 min at room temperature. Levels of EdU incorporation were measured using a Becton Dickinson Calibur flow cytometer.
For FACS analysis of cell cycle distribution, adherent cells in a six-well plate were trypsinized and collected in 15-mL centrifuge tubes. The collected cells were fixed by ethanol (final concentration of 70%) overnight at −20°C. Cells were then stained with 50 μg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma) with 0.1 mg/mL RNase A for 40 min at 37°C. After washing with PBS, the DNA content of the stained cells was then analyzed by a Becton Dickinson Calibur flow cytometer.
Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen). After incubating with DNase, cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Quantitative PCR was performed on a 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) using TaqMan gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression data were normalized to 18S rRNA.
Immunohistochemical staining
Immunohistochemical detection was performed using the Discovery XT processor (Ventana Medical Systems). Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were blocked for 30 min in 10% normal goat serum plus 2% BSA in PBS. Sections were incubated for 5 h with 0.4 μg/mL rabbit polyclonal anti-Ki67 (Vector Laboratories, VP-K451), 1 μg/mL mouse monoclonal anti-p27 (BD Biosciences, 55890), or 6 μg/mL rabbit polyclonal anti-Cyclin D1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, H-295) antibodies. Tissue sections were then incubated for 60 min with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories, PK6101) or goat anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, BA9200) at 1:200 dilutions. Blocker D, streptavidin-HRP, and the DAB detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Tumor xenograft study
10T cells were harvested with trypsin and resuspended in PBS. Approximately 107 cells were injected subcutaneously into both flanks of 6- to 8-wk-old athymic female nude mice (Harlan Laboratories). Formation of tumors was monitored. After tumors became palpable, tumor volumes were estimated by caliper measurements, assuming spherical geometry (volume = d3 × π/6). Mice were cared for in accordance with the institutional animal care and use committee at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Structural modeling
The active site of human IDH2 with isocitrate was modeled based on the highly homologous porcine IDH2 crystal structure, as previously described (Ward et al. 2010, 2012).
Dot blot
Genomic DNA was phenol–chloroform-extracted and quantified using NanoDrop. DNA was denatured with 0.1 M NaOH, serial-diluted, and spotted on a nitrocellulose membrane. 5mC antibody (Millipore, MABE146) was used at 1:2000 dilution.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using a Student's t-test (two-sample equal variance; two-tailed distribution) unless stated otherwise.
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Thompson laboratory for technical help and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Molecular Cytology Core Facility for technical help with the immunohistochemical study, the MSKCC Anti-tumor Assessment Core Facility for technical help with the mouse xenograft study, and the Epigenomics Core Facility of Weill Cornell Medical College for help with ERRBS. This work was supported by the Starr Cancer Consortium, grants from NCI and NIH (to C.B.T.), a Specialized Center of Research (SCOR) grant from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (to S.W.L.), and a U01 CTDD award from the National Cancer Institute (to S.W.L.). S.W.L. is the Goeffrey Beene Chair of Cancer Biology at MSKCC and an Investigator in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. C.C. receives a career development fellowship from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. P.S.W. was supported in part by the University of Pennsylvania Medical Scientist Training Program. J.H.H. is funded by the Stephen McDermott Chair in Surgery.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available for this article.
Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.226753.113.
References
- Akalin A, Garrett-Bakelman FE, Kormaksson M, Busuttil J, Zhang L, Khrebtukova I, Milne TA, Huang Y, Biswas D, Hess JL, et al. 2012a. Base-pair resolution DNA methylation sequencing reveals profoundly divergent epigenetic landscapes in acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS Genet 8: e1002781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akalin A, Kormaksson M, Li S, Garrett-Bakelman FE, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, Mason CE 2012b. methylKit: A comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol 13: R87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amary MF, Bacsi K, Maggiani F, Damato S, Halai D, Berisha F, Pollock R, O'Donnell P, Grigoriadis A, Diss T, et al. 2011a. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours. J Pathol 224: 334–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amary MF, Damato S, Halai D, Eskandarpour M, Berisha F, Bonar F, McCarthy S, Fantin VR, Straley KS, Lobo S, et al. 2011b. Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome are caused by somatic mosaic mutations of IDH1 and IDH2. Nat Genet 43: 1262–1265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arai M, Nobusawa S, Ikota H, Takemura S, Nakazato Y 2012. Frequent IDH1/2 mutations in intracranial chondrosarcoma: A possible diagnostic clue for its differentiation from chordoma. Brain Tumor Pathol 29: 201–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bracken AP, Dietrich N, Pasini D, Hansen KH, Helin K 2006. Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev 20: 1123–1136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury R, Yeoh KK, Tian YM, Hillringhaus L, Bagg EA, Rose NR, Leung IK, Li XS, Woon EC, Yang M, et al. 2011. The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases. EMBO Rep 12: 463–469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dang L, White DW, Gross S, Bennett BD, Bittinger MA, Driggers EM, Fantin VR, Jang HG, Jin S, Keenan MC, et al. 2009. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 462: 739–744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Figueroa ME, Abdel-Wahab O, Lu C, Ward PS, Patel J, Shih A, Li Y, Bhagwat N, Vasanthakumar A, Fernandez HF, et al. 2010. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell 18: 553–567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gumbiner BM 2005. Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 622–634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA 2009. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li S, Chou AP, Chen W, Chen R, Deng Y, Phillips HS, Selfridge J, Zurayk M, Lou JJ, Everson RG, et al. 2013. Overexpression of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant proteins renders glioma cells more sensitive to radiation. Neuro Oncol 15: 57–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Losman JA, Looper RE, Koivunen P, Lee S, Schneider RK, McMahon C, Cowley GS, Root DE, Ebert BL, Kaelin WG Jr 2013. (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate is sufficient to promote leukemogenesis and its effects are reversible. Science 339: 1621–1625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu C, Ward PS, Kapoor GS, Rohle D, Turcan S, Abdel-Wahab O, Edwards CR, Khanin R, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, et al. 2012. IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation. Nature 483: 474–478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mardis ER, Ding L, Dooling DJ, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Chen K, Koboldt DC, Fulton RS, Delehaunty KD, McGrath SD, et al. 2009. Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome. N Engl J Med 361: 1058–1066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikami Y, Ishii Y, Watanabe N, Shirakawa T, Suzuki S, Irie S, Isokawa K, Honda MJ 2011. CD271/p75(NTR) inhibits the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic, and myogenic lineages. Stem Cells Dev 20: 901–913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mullarky E, Mattaini KR, Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Locasale JW 2011. PHGDH amplification and altered glucose metabolism in human melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 24: 1112–1115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, Phillips HS, Pujara K, Berman BP, Pan F, Pelloski CE, Sulman EP, Bhat KP, et al. 2010. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 17: 510–522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oermann EK, Wu J, Guan KL, Xiong Y 2012. Alterations of metabolic genes and metabolites in cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23: 370–380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pansuriya TC, van Eijk R, d'Adamo P, van Ruler MA, Kuijjer ML, Oosting J, Cleton-Jansen AM, van Oosterwijk JG, Verbeke SL, Meijer D, et al. 2011. Somatic mosaic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are associated with enchondroma and spindle cell hemangioma in Ollier disease and Maffucci syndrome. Nat Genet 43: 1256–1261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reznikoff CA, Brankow DW, Heidelberger C 1973. Establishment and characterization of a cloned line of C3H mouse embryo cells sensitive to postconfluence inhibition of division. Cancer Res 33: 3231–3238 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohle D, Popovici-Muller J, Palaskas N, Turcan S, Grommes C, Campos C, Tsoi J, Clark O, Oldrini B, Komisopoulou E, et al. 2013. An inhibitor of mutant IDH1 delays growth and promotes differentiation of glioma cells. Science 340: 626–630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki M, Knobbe CB, Itsumi M, Elia AJ, Harris IS, Chio II, Cairns RA, McCracken S, Wakeham A, Haight J, et al. 2012a. D-2-hydroxyglutarate produced by mutant IDH1 perturbs collagen maturation and basement membrane function. Genes Dev 26: 2038–2049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki M, Knobbe CB, Munger JC, Lind EF, Brenner D, Brustle A, Harris IS, Holmes R, Wakeham A, Haight J, et al. 2012b. IDH1(R132H) mutation increases murine haematopoietic progenitors and alters epigenetics. Nature 488: 656–659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schechtman LM 2012. Rodent cell transformation assays—a brief historical perspective. Mutat Res 744: 3–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Squazzo SL, O'Geen H, Komashko VM, Krig SR, Jin VX, Jang SW, Margueron R, Reinberg D, Green R, Farnham PJ 2006. Suz12 binds to silenced regions of the genome in a cell-type-specific manner. Genome Res 16: 890–900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor SM, Jones PA 1979. Multiple new phenotypes induced in 10T1/2 and 3T3 cells treated with 5-azacytidine. Cell 17: 771–779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsai HC, Li H, Van Neste L, Cai Y, Robert C, Rassool FV, Shin JJ, Harbom KM, Beaty R, Pappou E, et al. 2012. Transient low doses of DNA-demethylating agents exert durable antitumor effects on hematological and epithelial tumor cells. Cancer Cell 21: 430–446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turcan S, Rohle D, Goenka A, Walsh LA, Fang F, Yilmaz E, Campos C, Fabius AW, Lu C, Ward PS, et al. 2012. IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Nature 483: 479–483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB 2009. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324: 1029–1033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang F, Travins J, Delabarre B, Penard-Lacronique V, Schalm S, Hansen E, Straley K, Kernytsky A, Liu W, Gliser C, et al. 2013. Targeted inhibition of mutant IDH2 in leukemia cells induces cellular differentiation. Science 340: 622–626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warburg O 1956. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123: 309–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward PS, Thompson CB 2012. Metabolic reprogramming: A cancer hallmark even Warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell 21: 297–308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward PS, Patel J, Wise DR, Abdel-Wahab O, Bennett BD, Coller HA, Cross JR, Fantin VR, Hedvat CV, Perl AE, et al. 2010. The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting α-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate. Cancer Cell 17: 225–234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward PS, Cross JR, Lu C, Weigert O, Abel-Wahab O, Levine RL, Weinstock DM, Sharp KA, Thompson CB 2012. Identification of additional IDH mutations associated with oncometabolite R(-)-2-hydroxyglutarate production. Oncogene 31: 2491–2498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward PS, Lu C, Cross JR, Abdel-Wahab O, Levine RL, Schwartz GK, Thompson CB 2013. The potential for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations to produce 2-hydroxyglutarate depends on allele specificity and subcellular compartmentalization. J Biol Chem 288: 3804–3815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wellen KE, Hatzivassiliou G, Sachdeva UM, Bui TV, Cross JR, Thompson CB 2009. ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Science 324: 1076–1080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams K, Christensen J, Helin K 2012. DNA methylation: TET proteins—guardians of CpG islands? EMBO Rep 13: 28–35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu H, Zhang Y 2011. Tet1 and 5-hydroxymethylation: A genome-wide view in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Cycle 10: 2428–2436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu W, Yang H, Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang P, Kim SH, Ito S, Yang C, Xiao MT, Liu LX, et al. 2011. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 19: 17–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, Kos I, Batinic-Haberle I, Jones S, Riggins GJ, et al. 2009. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360: 765–773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]