Abstract
Visual information is fundamental to how we understand our environment, make predictions, and interact with others. Recent research has underscored the importance of visuo-perceptual dysfunctions for cognitive deficits and pathophysiological processes in schizophrenia. In the current paper, we review evidence for the relevance of high frequency (beta/gamma) oscillations towards visuo-perceptual dysfunctions in schizophrenia. In the first part of the paper, we examine the relationship between beta/gamma band oscillations and visual processing during normal brain functioning. We then summarize EEG/MEG-studies which demonstrate reduced amplitude and synchrony of high-frequency activity during visual stimulation in schizophrenia. In the final part of the paper, we identify neurobiological correlates as well as offer perspectives for future research to stimulate further inquiry into the role of high-frequency oscillations in visual processing impairments in the disorder.
Keywords: schizophrenia, high-frequency neural oscillations, visual perception, neurobiology, evoked and induced neural activity, neural synchrony
Dysfunctions in visual perception in schizophrenia
Disturbances in visual perception were for a long time considered relatively unimportant in the understanding of schizophrenia (ScZ) compared to the more striking clinical presentation of hallucinations and delusions. Bleuer summarized this view as follows: “Sensory responses to external stimulus are quite normal. To be sure, the patients will complain that everything appears to be different. However, this strangeness is usually attributable to a deficit in customary associations and particularly to an alteration of emotional emphasis.” (Bleuler, 1969; page 76). Similarly, Kraepelin (1919) concurred that “[P]erception of external impressions in dementia praecox is not usually lessened to any great extent as far as a superficial examination goes.” (Kraepelin, 1971; page 5).
Following evidence from phenomenological research which indicated profound alterations in perceptual experience (see Uhlhaas and Mishara, 2007 for a review), an increasing number of studies began to investigate sensory processing experimentally (Place and Gilmore, 1980). Since then, a large body of evidence has accumulated that has highlighted impaired visual processing as a core deficit in schizophrenia (Klosterkötter et al., 2001; Javitt, 2009). Such dysfunctions involve the discrimination of orientation, motion, and object size (e.g., Butler and Javitt, 2005; Butler et al., 2007, 2008; Chen, 2011), which have been related to the magnocellular pathway because of reduced sensitivity to stimuli with low spatial frequency (Schechter et al., 2003; Butler and Javitt, 2005).
Moreover, ScZ-patients show reduced contextual influences in relationship to contrast (Yang et al., 2013), motion (Tadin et al., 2006), orientation (Yoon et al., 2010) as well as during contour-integration (Uhlhaas et al., 2006b), which could underlie impairments in perceptual organization (Uhlhaas and Silverstein, 2005). Additional visual processing deficits in ScZ have been revealed by masking paradigms (Green et al., 2011) which have highlighted longer intervals between the target and mask stimuli for accurate identification of targets (e.g., Green et al., 1994, 1999). Importantly, visual dysfunctions have been linked to impairments in higher cognitive functions (Javitt, 2009), such as working memory (Haenschel et al., 2009). Moreover, there is evidence to suggest that changes in visual perception are related to more complex features of the disorder, such as the development of delusions and changes in self-experiences (Uhlhaas and Mishara, 2007).
Data on abnormal visual functions in ScZ is consistent with evidence on anatomical abnormalities as revealed by post-mortem studies (Selemon et al., 1995; Selemon and Goldman-Rakic, 1999; Dorph-Petersen et al., 2007) as well as magnetic resonance (MR) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) studies (Staal et al., 2000; Clasen et al., 2003; Arnone et al., 2009; White et al., 2011; Whitford et al., 2011b). These findings suggest that in addition to abnormalities in fronto-temporal regions, alterations in anatomical parameters extend to early visual areas. More recently, electro/magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have disclosed corresponding deficits in neural responses during visual stimulation (Spencer et al., 2003; Wynn et al., 2005; Uhlhaas and Singer, 2006; Uhlhaas et al., 2006a,b; Yeap et al., 2006). Specifically, studies assessing event-related potentials (ERPs) have demonstrated impairments during early and later visual processing stages in ScZ (Box 1).
Box 1. Event-related potentials (ERPs), visual perception, and Schizophrenia.
ERP waveforms are commonly derived in EEG studies that investigate the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying sensory perception. ERP waveforms consist of a series of transient positive and negative voltage deflections that are time-locked to stimulus onset. These transient fluctuations in ERP waveform polarity are conventionally extracted as basic components and named by their polarity in conjunction with either their latency or ordinal position, relative to stimulus onset. In general, early components (e.g., those occurring before ~200 ms) are thought to reflect early sensory processing while higher cognitive processes are related to later components.
N80—an initial negative deflection that peaks ~70–90 ms post stimulus onset (Di Russo et al., 2007)—is considered the earliest visual ERP component and thought to be mainly driven by parvocellular (P) input but likely with small influence from the magnocellular (M) pathway in response to visual stimuli consisting of higher contrast levels (Foxe et al., 2008). In a recent investigation, using a range of visual stimuli that theoretically bias M or/and P pathways using systematic manipulation of stimulus luminance, chromatic contrasts and flicker, Núñez et al. (2013) demonstrated that the occipital N80 component in early-onset (but not adult-onset) ScZ was significantly lower in amplitude in response to stimuli that involve both M and P pathways. They also observed significantly prolonged onset of N80 latency in adult-onset ScZ. In contrast, the N80 amplitude in response to isolated P- and M-biased stimuli was comparable in both healthy controls and ScZ patients. The finding is suggestive of a deficit in M-priming on the P pathway in early-onset ScZ.
P1—a component with positive deflection ~100 ms post visual stimulus onset—is known to involve the dorsal and ventral visual streams (Martinez et al., 1999; Di Russo et al., 2002). In response to visual stimuli (e.g., motion, spatial, low contrast) that bias the magnocellular pathway, the occipital P1 amplitude is commonly reported to be markedly decreased in patients with ScZ (e.g., Doniger et al., 2002; Schechter et al., 2005; Butler et al., 2007; Lalor et al., 2012; Núñez et al., 2013; however, see e.g., Johnson et al., 2005; Wynn et al., 2008, also mentioned below). Prominent P1 amplitude reduction was also observed in ScZ patients when they engaged in visual tasks involving illusory contour processing (Foxe et al., 2005) or fragmented object recognition (Doniger et al., 2002), and this reduction paralleled the weaker scalp activations over their lateral and posterior occipital areas.
N1—a negative component peak that manifests ~150–200 ms—is thought to predominantly reflect ventral stream processing (e.g., Doniger et al., 2002). Many studies that have assessed the N1 component, e.g., using illusory contour or fragmented contoured stimuli for object recognition, have reported comparable N1 amplitudes between ScZ patients and controls (e.g., Foxe et al., 2001; Doniger et al., 2002; Foxe et al., 2005), suggesting that parvocellular-mediated ventral stream processing is largely unaffected. However, studies that investigated face processing in ScZ patients have demonstrated pronounced reduction in their N170 amplitude in response to face vs. building stimuli (Herrmann et al., 2004b; Turetsky et al., 2007). Similar prominent reduction in N150 amplitude was observed in ScZ patients engaged in local vs. global visual perceptual tasks, and the amount of amplitude decrease in response to global stimuli correlated with corresponding performance accuracy and response times (Johnson et al., 2005). Further evidence of N1 amplitude reduction (~200 post stimulus onset) is recently demonstrated in the fine-grain visual-masking discrimination task employed by (Plomp et al., 2013). Intriguingly, the extra time required by ScZ to reach normal discrimination performance levels did not alleviate the pronounced N1 amplitude reduction. Instead, as source analysis revealed, the discrimination difficulties are likely to be related to the significantly weaker parietal and lateral occipital activity in ScZ patients.
N250—a negative component that peaks ~250 ms over fronto-central electrode sites—is considered sensitive to the emotional content of faces (Streit et al., 1999, 2001). Some studies have found reduced N250 amplitude in ScZ patients (e.g., Streit et al., 2001; Wynn et al., 2008) with normal N170 suggesting emotional information decoding deficits, while others have found the opposite (e.g., Johnson et al., 2005; Turetsky et al., 2007) suggesting that facial feature encoding is impaired rather than emotional information decoding.
NCL—a negative component that manifests ~270–320 ms observed during visual tasks involving perceptual closure—is characterized by bilateral occipito-temporal scalp topography (Doniger et al., 2002) and is thought to reflect effortful extraction of object identity (Foxe et al., 2005). Significantly reduced NCL amplitude has been shown to be preceded by a normal N1 but prominently reduced P1 amplitude in ScZ patients (Doniger et al., 2002; Foxe et al., 2005). This observation has led to a view that the initial stages of visual ventral stream processes are unaffected in ScZ patients but the later stages of ventral stream processing involving object recognition are likely affected by indirect magnocellular-mediated dorsal stream inputs (e.g., Merigan and Maunsell, 1993; Nowak and Bullier, 1997; Schroeder et al., 1998) into the visual areas along the ventral stream (e.g., lateral occipital cortex).
P300—a positive component that peaks ~300–900 ms post stimulus onset. Unlike earlier potentials, it is supposed to be an endogenous component which reflects stimulus context and levels of attention and arousal. The auditory P300 has consistently been shown to be impaired both in amplitude and latency (Bramon et al., 2004) while evidence for a dysfunctions during visual processing are less consistent (Ford, 1999); but see recent findings by Oribe et al. (2013) on prodromal and first-episode ScZ-patients.
Given that the visual system has been extensively explored through anatomy, electrophysiology and neuroimaging, detailed examination of visual dysfunctions in ScZ may allow insights into the underlying neurobiological correlates. In the following review, we will focus on the role of high-frequency neural oscillations because considerable evidence exists on the role of beta (13–25 Hz)/gamma (25–200 Hz) band activity in visual processing as well as their potential involvement in the pathophysiology of ScZ. We will first examine the role of high-frequency neural activity during normal visual perception emphasizing work from invasive and non-invasive electrophysiology followed by an overview of studies with EEG/MEG that have examined alterations in high-frequency oscillations in ScZ. In the final section, we will discuss potential mechanisms which could account for abnormal beta/gamma oscillations in ScZ as well as provide recommendation for future research.
High-frequency oscillations and visual processing
Invasive electrophysiology
The involvement of gamma-band oscillations in sensory processing was first described by Adrian and colleagues in the 1940s (Adrian, 1950). Local field potential recordings from the olfactory bulb of anesthetized cats, rabbits, and hedgehogs showed pronounced oscillations in the 40–60 Hz frequency range. Subsequently, Freeman and colleagues (Bressler and Freeman, 1980; Freeman and Skarda, 1985) reported correlations between 35 and 85 Hz activity and olfactory perception, suggesting that gamma-band oscillatory modulations are involved in information coding in the olfactory system (Freeman, 1991).
Crucial evidence for a mechanistic role of gamma-band activity in visual perception and cortical computations was obtained by Singer and colleagues in the late 1980s (Singer, 1999). Specifically, Gray et al. (1989) showed that action potentials generated by cortical cells are phase-locked to the oscillatory gamma rhythm and consequently neurons aligned their discharges with high temporal precision. In its original formulation, the “Binding by Synchrony hypothesis” (BBS; Singer, 1999) proposed that ensembles of neurons that preferentially respond to features of the same object should fire synchronously, whereas these same neurons should not synchronize their firing to features belonging to other objects or to the background. Over the years, this hypothesis has gained substantial attention (for critical reviews see Gray, 1999; Shadlen and Movshon, 1999; Singer, 1999; Uhlhaas et al., 2009).
There is, however, conflicting evidence for the BBS in the primate primary visual area (V1) with some studies failing to find evidence for a relationship between binding of stimulus features and synchronous gamma-band activity (e.g., Lima et al., 2010). Given the large number of visual areas in the primate brain (Van Essen and Gallant, 1994), it is conceivable that binding through oscillatory mechanisms occurs in higher visual areas. Candidate brain regions would be structures that have been shown to express strong gamma oscillations in response to visual stimulation, such as the middle temporal cortex (MT) and V4 areas (e.g., Kreiter and Singer, 1996; Fries et al., 2001; but see also Thiele and Stoner, 2003; Palanca and DeAngelis, 2005). Nonetheless, it is important to note that the temporal and spatial scales for binding might be smaller than previously assumed and therefore even V1 remains as a viable candidate for binding (Fries et al., 2007; Havenith et al., 2011; Nikolić et al., 2013). These observations highlight the need to employ more sophisticated analysis techniques for the detection of transient signals that may be important for BBS.
In addition to stimulus parameters (see Box 2), the amplitude, and frequency of high-frequency oscillations in visual cortices can also be influenced by cognitive variables, such as attention. Initial evidence was provided by Fries and colleagues (Fries et al., 2001) who showed that 35–90 Hz activity in macaque visual area V4 strongly increased when behaviorally relevant stimuli were within the focus of attention. More recently, the same group demonstrated that spatial attention can also result in a shift to higher gamma-band frequencies in V1 (Bosman et al., 2012). Similarly, Lima et al. (2010) demonstrated using plaid stimuli that selective attention to one of the directional components of the plaid pattern affected gamma-band power in a manner that resembled the power (and frequency) modulation when the actual contrast of the stimulus was increased. Additionally, V1 gamma spectral power in macaques was shown to increase with temporal expectancy for behaviorally relevant events.
Box 2. Stimulus parameters and high-frequency neural oscillations.
High-frequency oscillations are modulated by several important parameters, such as color, contrast, presentation eccentricity, orientation, and speed. The complexity of natural images makes it difficult to systematically explore the influence of any particular features on brain activity. Thus, simplified stimuli that can be parametrically changed over a feature space are typically employed. In particular, gratings are commonly used because they produce strong responses in the gamma frequency range. A brief overview of these parameters and their observed influence on high frequency oscillations are listed below.
Size
The effect of grating size on the activity recorded from the macaque primary visual area (V1) is such that bigger gratings generate stronger oscillations, lower peak frequency, and decreased firing rates (Gieselmann and Thiele, 2008; Jia et al., 2013a). Human MEG studies replicated the positive relationship between stimulus size and gamma frequency power, but failed to reproduce the effect of size modulating peak gamma frequency (Perry et al., 2013).
Position
The frequency of gamma oscillatory response is dependent on the apparent eccentricity of the stimulus. Centrally presented gratings tend to generate higher frequencies than stimuli presented peripherally (Lima et al., 2010).
Contrast
Gratings with higher contrast are associated with higher firing rates and increased gamma peak-frequency (Ray and Maunsell, 2010). The strength of gamma-band oscillations initially increases with contrast but if the contrast is too high there is a tendency for the oscillations to reduce in power (Ray and Maunsell, 2010; Jia et al., 2013b; Roberts et al., 2013).
Speed
Gamma-band oscillations vary consistently with stimulus-velocity of bars (Gray et al., 1990) and gratings (Friedman-Hill et al., 2000; Lima et al., 2011). In humans, static gratings generate lower peak gamma frequencies than moving gratings (Swettenham et al., 2009; Muthukumaraswamy and Singh, 2013).
Spatial frequency
The spatial frequency of gratings is known to modulate gamma power (Adjamian et al., 2004) and firing rates (Lima et al., 2010) following an inverted U relationship. Human neuroimaging data suggest that the peak frequency of gamma response is tuned to a narrow band of spatial frequency (2–4 cycles per degree; cpd), peaking at 3cpd (Adjamian et al., 2004); a finding not currently observed in monkey neurophysiology (Lima et al., 2010).
Orientation and direction
Animal neurophysiology has shown that gamma power and frequency are tuned to stimulus orientation and the direction of stimulus motion (Feng et al., 2010; Jia et al., 2013b). However, these effects have not yet been demonstrated in humans.
Noise levels
Progressively adding noise over a high contrast grating reduces the amplitude of gamma-band oscillations and their peak frequency without altering the average firing rates (Jia et al., 2011, 2013b).
Luminance profile
The luminance profile of a grating also influences gamma responses, with square waves generating more gamma power than sinusoidal gratings (Muthukumaraswamy and Singh, 2008).
Stimulus type
Gratings formed by concentric circles have been shown to produce higher gamma power compared to regular gratings formed by straight parallel elements (Muthukumaraswamy and Singh, 2013).
Stimulus complexity
Increases in stimulus complexity may lead to dramatic reductions in gamma-band power and also to changes in peak frequency (Lima et al., 2010).
Color
Pure color isoluminant gratings have been shown to produce undetectable gamma oscillations in human MEG recordings, that otherwise manifested strong gamma responses to luminance contrast gratings (Adjamian et al., 2008).
EEG-MEG studies
Following the initial findings in both anaesthetized and awake animals on the potential relationship with visual processing (Singer and Gray, 1995), high-frequency oscillatory responses to visual stimuli have also been documented in EEG/MEG and electrocorticographic (ECoG) in humans (Sauvé, 1999; Tallon-Baudry and Bertrand, 1999; Lachaux et al., 2005; Tallon-Baudry, 2009; Martinovic and Busch, 2011). Broadly three different categories of high-frequency responses can be distinguished (Box 3).
Box 3. Measures of high-frequency oscillations.
Neural oscillations can be characterized by their frequency, amplitude, and phase. These characteristic features are derived through the time-frequency decomposition of electrophysiological signals by means of a Fourier, Wavelet or Multi-Taper analyses. These techniques estimate the strength (amplitude) and phase (time-variant angle) of the signal at a particular frequency range. A signal's phase consistency across trials, described as the phase-locking index, can be computed from its phase information (Lachaux et al., 1999, 2003). Apart from inter-trial oscillatory phase-locking, the same approach can also be used to assess the inter-areal synchrony of neural oscillations (Lachaux et al., 1999; Rodriguez et al., 1999; Gross et al., 2001; Varela et al., 2001; Siegel et al., 2008; Hipp et al., 2011). Importantly, this phase-locking index provides an estimation of neural synchrony irrespective of the amplitude of the oscillatory signal. This estimate of synchrony between signals is distinct from spectral coherence measures in which amplitude and phase information are intermixed (Gross et al., 2001).
Several different parameters of high-frequency activity can be distinguished which are frequently employed in the analysis of electrophysiological data (Tallon-Baudry et al., 1996; Roach and Mathalon, 2008).
Evoked oscillations are phase- and time-locked to the stimulus onset, occurring ~70–120 ms post stimulus onset. They are typically detected by averaging over a large number of single trials and then band-pass filtered at the frequency range of interest to assess the latency and peak amplitude of this averaged signal.
Induced oscillatory responses manifest later than evoked responses with latencies ~200–400 ms and are not phase- locked to stimulus onset. Estimates of phase and amplitude are derived via time-frequency transformations (e.g., Morlet wavelets or Short Time Fourier Transforms) at single-trial level prior to averaging across trials.
Repetitive presentation of a stimulus at a consistent frequency can lead to entrainment of neural activity at the stimulation frequency and is referred to as “steady-state” response (SSR, e.g., Herrmann, 2001). The peak of SSRs should typically correspond to the stimulation frequency, although responses to the harmonics of the stimulation frequency are also observed with reduced amplitude.
Evoked high frequency oscillatory responses are typically observed ~70–120 ms post stimulus with an occipital topography (e.g., Martinovic and Busch, 2011). Sources of evoked gamma activity during simple visual stimulus perception or object recognition have been localized to primary visual (Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2010), lateral occipital-temporal and inferior temporal cortical areas (Gruber et al., 2006). Amplitude and phase-locking of evoked high-frequency oscillations are modulated by stimulus properties. Corroborating invasive studies (Box 2), human neuroimaging research have also reported beta and gamma-band activity amplitude increases with contrast (Sannita et al., 1995; Schadow et al., 2007), stimulus duration, and size (Perry et al., 2013). In addition, spatial frequency modulates the power of high-frequency activity non-monotonically (Sannita et al., 1995; Tzelepi et al., 2000) and eccentricity decreases beta/gamma-band power (Busch et al., 2004; Fründ et al., 2007).
Due to their latency and topography, evoked high-frequency responses are likely to reflect feed forward driven responses (e.g., Butler and Javitt, 2005; Tobimatsu and Celesia, 2006; Martinovic and Busch, 2011). Early studies suggested that both amplitude and latency of evoked high-frequency activity were largely unaffected by experimental manipulations involving attention (e.g., Tallon et al., 1995; Tallon-Baudry et al., 1996, 1997). However, more recent findings (Herrmann et al., 1999; Frund et al., 2008) have challenged this view through demonstrating that top-down factors can impact on evoked gamma-band activity as well (e.g., Chaumon et al., 2009).
Following the link between binding of stimulus of elements into coherent representations and gamma-band oscillations in invasive recordings (Gray et al., 1989), several EEG and MEG-studies have also examined the role of gamma-band oscillations during perceptual organization (Lutzenberger et al., 1995; Revonsuo et al., 1997; Keil et al., 1999; Spencer et al., 2003; Grützner et al., 2010), demonstrating increased amplitude and synchrony of gamma-band activity during the construction of coherent object representations. More recently, intracranial EEG data have complemented this evidence (Lachaux et al., 2005).
While induced oscillations are strongly enhanced by top-down factors (Vidal et al., 2006; Melloni et al., 2007), several studies have indicated that basic stimulus parameters, such as orientation (Edden et al., 2009), spatial frequency (Hadjipapas et al., 2007; Perry et al., 2013), luminance (Adjamian et al., 2008), and motion (Swettenham et al., 2009) also influence the occurrence of high-frequency activity. These findings, thus, challenge a simple dichotomy between evoked and induced activity. Moreover, recent findings demonstrated that sub-bands of low (~30–60 Hz) and high (~70–120 Hz) gamma-band oscillations are flexibly recruited by both feed-forward and feedback processes. For example, 30–60 Hz activity showed increases with initial unconscious associative learning of target-specific context in a search-task while 70–120 Hz oscillations occurred regardless of stimulus contexts (Chaumon et al., 2009). Likewise, amplitude of low gamma-band activity increases with conscious visual awareness in contrast to attention-related gamma band activity at higher frequencies (Wyart and Tallon-Baudry, 2008). The close association between the modulation of both low and high gamma band activity and cognitive processes further suggests that different gamma band frequencies could support the dynamic formation of distinct assemblies that underlie specific behavioral or cognitive function through “multiplexing” neural signal transmission (Vidal et al., 2006; Wyart and Tallon-Baudry, 2008).
Alterations in high-frequency neural oscillations during visual processing in schizophrenia
The wealth of research highlights that high-frequency neural oscillations are involved in perceptual processing during normal brain functioning (Herrmann et al., 2004a; Tallon-Baudry, 2009; Martinovic and Busch, 2011). It is therefore conceivable that disturbances in the amplitude and synchrony of beta/gamma-band oscillations may have an important role in visual dysfunctions in ScZ. Indeed, a growing number of studies exploring this relationship have employed a range of visual tasks and assessed the integrity of the evoked and induced neural responses using different oscillatory parameters (see Table 1 for an overview and also Figure 1).
Table 1.
Paradigm | Imaging modality | Oscillatory measure | Parameter assessed | Main findings | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steady state stimulation | EEG | Evoked | Amplitude | 17–30 Hz range amplitude decrease over occipital electrodes | Krishnan et al., 2005 |
Backward masking | EEG | Evoked | Amplitude | 30–40 Hz range amplitude decrease across electrodes | Wynn et al., 2005 |
EEG | Evoked | Amplitude/Latency | 30–35 Hz range amplitude decrease over parieto-occipital electrodes | Green et al., 2003 | |
Oddball detection | EEG | Evoked | Inter-trial phase-locking | Decreased 30–38 Hz range phase-locking over parieto-occipital electrodes | Spencer et al., 2008 |
Illusory square | EEG | Evoked | Inter-trial phase-locking | Decreased 28–35 Hz range phase-locking over parieto-occipital electrodes | Spencer et al., 2004 |
Induced | Inter-trial phase-locking | i) Decreased 30–45 Hz range phase-locking | |||
ii) Decrease in peak phase-locking frequency (at 22–26 Hz cf. controls) over occipital and parietal electrodes in response-locked analysis | |||||
Evoked | Inter-trial phase-locking | i) Decreased 24–48 Hz phase-locking | |||
ii) Decrease in peak phase-locking frequency in response to ‘No-Square’ stimuli over occipital and central electrodes | Spencer et al., 2003 | ||||
Induced | Inter-sensor phase-coherence | Long-range 20–26 Hz range decrease in phase-locking | |||
Inter-hemispheric decrease in peak phase-coherence frequency (37–44 Hz cf. 48–57 Hz) particularly over posterior electrodes | |||||
Mooney faces | MEG | Evoked | Amplitude | i) 25–140 Hz range amplitude decrease, especially pronounced in the 60–140 Hz range | Grützner et al., 2013 |
ii) 25–60 Hz range fronto-central amplitude increase | |||||
Inter-trial phase-locking | Decreased 60–140 Hz range phase-locking | ||||
Induced | Amplitude | 60–140 Hz range amplitude decrease over occipital sensors | |||
EEG | Induced | Amplitude | Insignificant difference in the 40–70 Hz range across electrodes | Uhlhaas et al., 2006a | |
Inter-trial phase-locking | Decreased and delayed onset latency of 20–55 Hz range phase-locking | ||||
Inter-sensor phase-coherence | Decreased 20–30 Hz phase-coherence between fronto-temporal and parieto-occipital electrodes |
Main findings of these studies are reported in brief, highlighting the frequency range of significant effects observed in patients cf. healthy controls.
SSVEPs
Research investigating steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) have observed reduced amplitude-modulation to repetitive stimulation at high but also at lower-frequencies in patients with schizophrenia relative to healthy controls. Krishnan et al. (2005) investigated SSVEPs to photic stimulation at frequencies from 4 to 40 Hz in EEG-recordings and reported decreased occipital amplitude modulation at 17, 23, and 30 Hz stimulation (Figure 1). In addition, higher “background noise,” which was defined as averaged power of neural activity 1 Hz above and below the photic stimulation frequency, was observed at frequencies 4–20 Hz in ScZ-patients. The data from SSVEPs parallel findings from auditory entrainment experiments suggesting a basic impairment of cortical circuits to support high-frequency activity in ScZ. In contrast to visual SSVEPs, however, auditory entrainment impairments have been predominantly demonstrated at 40 Hz frequency stimulation (Kwon et al., 1999). Although more recent data have also demonstrated entrainments deficits at 80 Hz as well as at theta-frequency ranges (Hamm et al., 2011).
Evoked activity
Several studies have examined the integrity of evoked oscillations in ScZ using a variety of tasks. Backward masking paradigms are often used to assess early visual processing in ScZ. Given that basic features of any visual stimulus need to be integrated into a percept along the visual processing pathways, the effects of target percept masking could occur through the process of “integrating” the mask percept with the target percept, or through the process of “interrupting” the identification of target perception at a later stage of visual processing, or even via the process in which the target percept is “substituted” by that of the mask through a fast-acting process (Green et al., 2011). ScZ patients and unaffected siblings require longer inter-stimuli-intervals (ISI) between the target-mask stimuli for accurate feature identification of briefly presented targets (Green et al., 1994, 1997; Kéri et al., 2001). Depending on the type of masking (e.g., integration, interruption, or substitution; Green et al., 2011) the prolonged ISI interval has been linked to deficits in the magnocellular (M) and parvocellular (P) pathways (Schechter et al., 2003, 2005; Green et al., 2011).
The relationship between backward masking for location and object identification and gamma-band activity was examined in a series of studies by Green et al. (Green et al., 1999, 2003; Wynn et al., 2005). Systematic variation of inter-stimuli-intervals (ISIs) revealed that the response functions of ScZ-patients were best fitted with a continuous sine while in controls sensitivity to ISIs was consistent with a damped sinusoid (Green et al., 2003). Conversion of the wavelength parameter indicated that 30–35 Hz frequencies reflected best detection performance in controls. For ScZ-patients, the fitted sinusoids yielded a 32 Hz frequency conversion for the backward-masked location identification but a lower 15 Hz frequency for the backward-masked object identification.
To further link dysfunctions between backward masking and gamma-band activity, Green et al. (2003) also assessed EEG signals in response to backward masking of object identification in the 30–35 Hz frequency range. Peak latency in the 30–35 Hz spectral activity differed between groups with ScZ patients manifesting an earlier occipital-parietal peak around 100 ms while in controls gamma-bad activity was delayed (~200 ms), suggesting intact sensory registration in ScZ-patients. A follow-up study by Wynn et al. (2005) reported, however, reduced 30–40 Hz spectral power in ScZ patients between 50 and 200 ms during backward masking. In addition, while controls expressed stronger spectral activity to incorrect (vs. correct) trials, the opposite was observed for ScZ patients. It is presently unclear whether backward masking deficits involve impaired evoked oscillations or whether later processing stages might be compromised.
Deficits in high-frequency oscillations are also observed in response to basic sensory stimuli. Spencer et al. (2008) examined evoked EEG responses to auditory and visual stimuli in chronic ScZ patients (Figure 1). Interestingly, ScZ-patients' spectral amplitude and measure of inter-trial phase-locking to auditory stimuli were comparable to healthy controls. In contrast, the 25–45 Hz visually-evoked gamma oscillatory response was absent in the phase-locking frequency maps of ScZ patients, whose 30–38 Hz phase-locking over occipital regions was significantly reduced.
Similarly, ScZ-patients are characterized by reduced gamma-band responses to illusory square stimuli that presumably engage visual binding processes (Spencer et al., 2003, 2004). Spencer et al. (2003) showed that ScZ patients expressed a weaker P1 component which was accompanied by a reduced phase-locking of occipital evoked (24–48 Hz) activity to illusory square stimuli relative to controls. Moreover, ScZ patients' phase-locking over frontal-central EEG sensors were delayed in response to illusory squares, and occurred at lower frequencies. In a follow-up study, Spencer et al. (2004) examined response-time (RT) locked (20–45 Hz) evoked beta/gamma-band activity during the same paradigm and found reduced phase-locked activity in the 30–45 Hz frequency range in ScZ-patients which was accompanied by a shift to lower (22–26 Hz) activity relative to controls.
Induced activity
Given that non-stimulus-locked (induced) oscillations, have been reported during perceptual organization processes during normal brain functioning (Rodriguez et al., 1999; Tallon-Baudry and Bertrand, 1999), it is likely that a focus on evoked activity only partially addresses the contribution of high-frequency activity toward visuo-perceptual dysfunctions in ScZ. To this end, two studies by Uhlhaas and colleagues (Uhlhaas et al., 2006a; Grützner et al., 2013) investigated induced beta/gamma spectral power during the viewing of Mooney faces, which involve the grouping of the fragmentary parts into coherent images based on the Gestalt principle of closure (Mooney and Ferguson, 1951). EEG-response to Mooney faces revealed largely intact gamma-band activity in ScZ-patients relative to controls (Uhlhaas et al., 2006a). However, a subsequent study with MEG (Grützner et al., 2013) reported prominent reduction in evoked and induced 60–120 Hz spectral activity in ScZ-patients (effect size: d = 1.26; Figure 1). Differences between the findings from EEG and MEG-data may be due to the fact MEG has improved sensitivity in detecting low-amplitude high-frequency oscillations than EEG (Muthukumaraswamy, 2013).
The findings of impaired induced gamma-band activity during perceptual organization are complemented by data showing reduced high-frequency activity during working memory and executive processes Haenschel et al. (2009) investigated gamma-band activity in EEG-data during a visual working memory paradigm demonstrating significant reductions in gamma-band power at higher working memory load conditions in early-onset ScZ-patients. Similarly, Cho et al. (2006) reported a decrease in induced gamma-band power in chronic ScZ-patients during a cognitive control task which involved the inhibition of a prepotent response.
Long-range synchrony
In addition to the reduction in amplitude and consistency of evoked and induced spectral activity in ScZ patients, several studies have also assessed long-range neural synchrony through analyzing phase-synchronization between electrode pairs. This is of particular relevance because substantial evidence suggests that the functional networks underlying perception, attention, and executive processes rely on dynamic coordination through the inter-areal phase locking rhythmic activity (Lachaux et al., 1999; Varela et al., 2001). Spencer et al. (2003) observed a delayed onset of the 37–44 Hz phase synchrony as well as pronounced decreases in inter-hemispheric coherence during illusory-square perception over parietal electrodes in patients with ScZ. Moreover, Uhlhaas et al. (2006a) reported decreased phase-synchrony over fronto-temporal, and parieto-occipital sensors in the 200–300 ms period post stimulus onset, predominantly at beta (20–30 Hz) but also in the gamma-frequency range (31–38 Hz) during the perception of Mooney faces. The significant reductions in phase-synchrony observed in ScZ patients could indicate a global deficit in generating and sustaining synchrony both within local and also between distributed neural networks relevant for sensory processing.
Relationships with clinical variables
Preliminary evidence suggests that alterations in high-frequency oscillations during visual processing in ScZ-patients may reflect psychopathological variables. Spencer et al. (Spencer et al., 2003, 2004) reported that evoked phase-synchrony during illusory square perception was correlated with conceptual disorganization and visual hallucinations as well as a relationship between the lowered oscillation frequency and the expression of positive symptoms (delusions) and conceptual disorganization. Finally, Uhlhaas et al. (2006a) reported a positive relationship between 40 and 70 Hz phase synchrony and positive symptoms while a reduction of phase-synchronization correlated with elevated negative symptoms. Significant correlations have also been reported with spectral power. Reduced 60–120 Hz spectral power was found to correlate with elevated levels of disorganization by Grützner et al. (2013). However, an important issue is whether these observed alterations in high-frequency activity are independent of medication status. To date, the only published finding by Minzenberg et al. (2010) indicated that gamma-band activity during cognitive control was reduced in medication-naïve FE-ScZ-patients.
Pathophysiology of visual processing deficits and neural oscillations
Visually elicited high-frequency oscillations might be ideally suited for translations research (Spencer, 2009; Uhlhaas and Singer, 2012). In the following section, we review the potential involvement of changes in excitatory-inhibition balance, anatomical parameters, and genetic factors that could provide plausible explanations for the breakdown of high-frequency neural oscillations and the associated visual dysfunction observed in ScZ.
Excitatory-inhibition (E/I) balance
One important parameter for the generation of high-frequency oscillations in visual circuits but also in the cortex in general is the balance between excitation and inhibition (E/I-balance). Convergence of theoretical (Spencer, 2009; Kopell et al., 2010) and empirical studies (Whittington et al., 1995; Wang and Buzsáki, 1996; Traub et al., 2004) indicate that the generation of high-frequency oscillations crucially involve networks of inhibitory interneurons (Whittington et al., 1995; Bartos et al., 2007; Mann and Paulsen, 2007; Buzsáki and Wang, 2012) and glutamatergically mediated excitatory drive (Lukatch et al., 2005; Chamberlain et al., 2012). Specifically, basket cells which express calcium-binding parvalbumim (PV; Cardin et al., 2009; Sohal et al., 2009; Volman et al., 2011) are of particular relevance for the generation of high-frequency oscillations, specifically at gamma-band frequencies, because of their fast-spiking properties (e.g., Buzsaki et al., 1983; Kawaguchi and Kubota, 1997).
More recently, optogenetic tools have enabled more precise links between changes in E/I-balance parameters and network oscillations to be established. For example, Sohal et al. (2009) showed that inhibition of PV interneurons led to an immediate suppression of 30–80 Hz oscillations while 10–30 Hz oscillations increased in power. In contrast, increasing PV-interneuron mediated feedback inhibition by boosting principal cell activity enhanced gamma-band power (Cardin et al., 2009).
Evidence suggests that E/I-balance parameters are disturbed in ScZ (Lewis et al., 2005, 2012). Specifically, the mRNA of GAD67 which synthesizes GABA is reduced in several cortical areas, including visual regions, in ScZ-patients (Akbarian et al., 1995; Mirnics et al., 2000; Hashimoto et al., 2003; Lewis et al., 2011, 2012). Moreover, this decrease is accompanied by reduced expression of the GABA membrane transporter 1 (GAT1; Volk et al., 2001; Lewis et al., 2005; Akbarian and Huang, 2006). GAT1 membrane transporters are expressed on chandelier neurons whose axon terminals synapse exclusively with the axonal initial segment of pyramidal neurons and thus uniquely regulate the excitatory pyramidal output (Lewis, 2000). Further evidence for a dysfunction in GABAergic transmission comes from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) studies which have shown abnormal GABA-levels (Kegeles et al., 2012). Furthermore, MRS-measured reduction in GABA-levels was found to correlate with psychophysical impairment in orientation-specific surround suppression in ScZ patients (Yoon et al., 2010), suggesting a potential role in visual dysfunctions.
Additional parameters crucial for the generation of high-frequency oscillations include the AMPA- and NMDA-receptor-mediated activation of PV interneuron (Belforte et al., 2010; Carlén et al., 2012; Gonzalez-Burgos and Lewis, 2012). NMDA-receptor dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of ScZ through evidence from genetics (Carlén et al., 2012; Kirov et al., 2012) as well as from studies which have tested the impact of NMDA-receptor blockade on cortical processes. In healthy controls, Ketamine, an antagonist of the NMDA-receptor, elicits the full range of psychotic symptoms and impairments in cognitive processes, including visual perception (Hong et al., 2010). Furthermore, it has been shown in animal models that the blockade of NMDA-receptors induced aberrant high-frequency oscillations in extended cortical and subcortical networks (e.g., Hunt et al., 2011; Kittelberger et al., 2012; Phillips et al., 2012). For example, Anver et al. (2011) showed that NMDA-antagonists reduced the frequency of gamma-band oscillations as well as induced phase coupling of the normally independent generating networks in cortical layers III and V. These findings suggest that E/I-balance is crucial in assuring coordinated occurrence of high-frequency activity during normal brain functioning in networks involved in visual processing. Consequently, abnormalities in these parameters could lead to changes in both amplitude and synchrony of beta/gamma-band oscillations and, in turn, lead to visual deficits.
Anatomical parameters
In addition to the crucial contribution of GABAergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission towards high-frequency oscillations, anatomical parameters such as the layout of excitatory long-range connections have been implicated in long-range synchronization and the integrity of visual processing (Engel et al., 1991). Synchronization of oscillatory activity in the beta and gamma frequency range is dependent on cortico-cortical connections that reciprocally link cells situated in the same cortical area, in different areas, or even in different hemispheres (Engel et al., 1991). Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that callosal connections contribute to the subjective experience of a visual motion stimulus that requires inter-hemispheric integration (Genc et al., 2011). As such, disruptions in the volume and organization of anatomical connectivity could impair long-range synchronization and impact on visual processes that require large-scale integration. However, a recent study that investigated inter-hemispheric transfer times with ERPs did not support this hypothesis in ScZ (Whitford et al., 2011a).
Further research is required to examine, in greater detail, the relationship between anatomical abnormalities and high-frequency oscillations. This is particularly relevant given the evidence from in vivo and post-mortem studies in patients with ScZ highlighting that both the volume and organization of white matter is abnormal, including both early and higher visual areas (Akbarian and Huang, 2006; Hashimoto et al., 2008). Additional evidence supporting the abnormal anatomy of visual regions was reported by Selemon et al. (1995) who observed increased neuronal density in area 17 (occipital cortex) as well as in area 9 (frontal cortex) in ScZ-patients. In contrast, Dorph-Petersen et al. (2007) found no difference in neuronal density in area 17 in ScZ and cortical thickness was in the normal range. However, the authors reported significantly reduced number of neurons as well as volumetric decreases in area 17 (Dorph-Petersen et al., 2007).
Abnormalities in gray matter could also potentially impact on the amplitude of neural oscillations as EEG/MEG signals are dependent on the ionic currents flowing in the dendrites of clusters of synchronously activated neurons during synaptic transmission that could be compromised by either reductions in the number of neurons and/or decreases in neuropil. Supporting a potential link between electrophysiological parameters and anatomical abnormalities in ScZ, Onitsuka et al. (2006) demonstrated an association between the degree of gray matter reduction and a decrease in the N170 ERP component.
Genes
With the genetic heritability of ScZ being estimated to be around 50–80% (e.g., Sullivan et al., 2003; Harrison and Weinberger, 2004), one plausible hypothesis is that ScZ risk genes may influence the strength and frequency of neural oscillations in the disorder. Indeed, recent animal models which have examined the effects of risk genes on changes in high-frequency oscillations support this view. Carlson et al. (2011) investigated gamma-band responses during auditory stimulation in mice with reduced dysbindin-1 expression which is a major ScZ risk gene (Straub et al., 2002; Ross et al., 2006; O'Tuathaigh et al., 2007). Deficits in early evoked gamma-band activity were found which were associated with a decrease in PV cell immune-reactivity. Similarly, Fisahn et al. (2009) demonstrated that polymorphisms in genes encoding Neuregulin-1 (NRG-1) and one of its receptors (ErbB4) selectively increase the power of in vitro gamma-band oscillations in hippocampal slices. Accordingly, these data suggest the possibility that ScZ-risk genes modify the E/I-balance parameters which in turn dysregulate the occurrence of high-frequency oscillations.
Recent evidence from genetic studies which have investigated the heritability of visually-induced gamma-band oscillations supports the utility of using high-frequency activity as an intermediate phenotype. van Pelt et al. (2012) recorded visually induced MEG-activity in monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs (Figure 2). The peak-frequency of gamma-band oscillations were highly correlated in monozygotic but not in dizygotic twins, highlighting a strong genetic determination of gamma-band oscillations. Additionally, reduced auditory evoked gamma-band activity has been demonstrated in first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia as well as in unaffected, monozygotic twins with a high degree of heritability (Hall et al., 2011; Figure 2). Moreover, Hong et al. (2008) showed that abnormalities in theta- and alpha-band oscillations during sensory gating in ScZ-patients, their relatives, and healthy controls were characterized by heritability rates that exceeded those of traditional ERP measures.
Issues for future research
The current review has shown a close relationship between visual processing and high-frequency oscillations during normal brain functioning as well as a potential link between aberrant beta/gamma-band activity and dysfunctional visual perception in ScZ. Given the known neurobiological parameters involved in the generation of high-frequency oscillations, we suggest that visually elicited high-frequency oscillations may constitute a useful window for gaining further insights into the pathophysiology of ScZ. To this end, we would like to raise several issues that we consider critical for future research.
The overall conclusion that can be drawn from the studies reviewed is that ScZ is associated with reductions in the amplitude, frequency, and/or synchronization of beta/gamma-band oscillations during visual processing. Such deficits have been demonstrated during a wide range of task-conditions, such as in basic responses to visual entrainment (e.g., Krishnan et al., 2005), impaired stimulus-locking of oscillatory activity during perceptual binding (Spencer et al., 2003, 2004, 2008) and visual masking (Green et al., 1999, 2003; Wynn et al., 2005) as well as deficits in generating high-frequency oscillations (Grützner et al., 2013) and their large-scale integration during perceptual organization of complex stimuli (Spencer et al., 2003; Uhlhaas et al., 2006a,b). Abnormalities in visually elicited high-frequency oscillations are consistent with reduced beta/gamma-band activity during auditory (Kwon et al., 1999) and somatosensory perception (Arnfred et al., 2011). Together these findings suggest that cortical circuits in ScZ may be characterized by a comprehensive impairment in the mechanisms responsible for the generation and coordination of adequate high-frequency activity that is present in multiple regions and networks.
High-frequency oscillations, the visual system and ScZ
Psychophysical evidence has shown that ScZ-patients are characterized by several deficits in visual processing which include a deficit in stimuli involving the magnocellular pathway (Butler et al., 2008; Javitt, 2009), reduced contextual integration (Yoon et al., 2010; Dias et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013) and dysfunctions in perceptual organization (Uhlhaas and Silverstein, 2005). Given that the amplitude and the frequency of beta/gamma-band oscillations are closely related to stimulus properties during normal brain functioning (see Box 2), a combination of precise manipulation of stimulus parameters and electrophysiological approaches may yield novel insights into the relationship between visuo-perceptual dysfunctions and high-frequency oscillations in ScZ.
A reported core deficit underlying visual dysfunction in ScZ is the gain control of visual neuronal responses in ScZ (Butler et al., 2008). Gain control refers to the ability of neurons to modulate their response amplitude and constitutes a general feature of cortical computations (Salinas and Thier, 2000). Impairments in gain control in ScZ are supported by reduced contrast sensitivity (Yang et al., 2013), impaired motion perception (Kim et al., 2006; Chen, 2011) and contextual effects (Tadin et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2013; see also Butler et al., 2008 for a review). Moreover, neurophysiological studies have provided psychophysical evidence that these stimulus parameters, which are differentially processed in ScZ, modulate high-frequency activity. For example, increasing the contrast of visual stimuli enhances the frequency of the gamma-band rhythm in V1 (Ray and Maunsell, 2010) and V2 (Roberts et al., 2013). Similar findings have been observed for motion whereby static gratings are associated with lower peak frequencies than moving gratings (Gray et al., 1990; Swettenham et al., 2009; Muthukumaraswamy and Singh, 2013; see Box 2). Given these robust relationships, one option for future studies is to parametrically manipulate stimulus contrast and velocity and assess changes in high-frequency oscillations which could yield insights into the integrity of visual circuits in ScZ to support the occurrence and amplitude tuning of beta/gamma-band oscillations.
While such experiments are potentially important for probing dysfunctions in early visual regions, oscillatory dynamics are also crucially involved in mediating the influences of neuronal activity generated in anterior brain regions over the early stages of visual processing, such as during attention (Womelsdorf and Fries, 2007). Of relevance, evidence supporting the facilitatory effects of attention processes, particularly spatial attention, on visually induced high-frequency oscillations constitutes an additional example of gain control whereby neuronal responses to stimuli at attended locations are increased relatively to non-attended locations (Hillyard et al., 1998). This gain in neural response could be mediated through changes in the synchrony of inhibitory networks (Tiesinga et al., 2004a,b).
Previous psychophysical research in ScZ has implicated deficits in the utilization of top-down mediated cues (Silverstein et al., 1996) as well as dysfunctions in bottom-up driven processing in early visual pathways (Uhlhaas and Silverstein, 2005; Butler et al., 2007), suggesting that effects of attention on neural oscillations could be relevant in order to disentangle the contribution of feed-forward mediated vs. top-down processes toward visual deficits in ScZ. Recent studies from invasive electrophysiology (Fries et al., 2001; Ray et al., 2013) as well as from EEG/MEG (Wyart and Tallon-Baudry, 2008) have demonstrated that attention can lead to an increase in both the amplitude as well as the frequency shift of gamma-band activity (Kahlbrock et al., 2012; Koelewijn et al., 2013). These effects occur in early visual areas (Koelewijn et al., 2013) as well as at higher brain areas (Tallon-Baudry et al., 2005) and are accompanied by changes in the coherence of oscillations between early and higher visual regions (Siegel et al., 2008; Bosman et al., 2012). Therefore, detailed probing of attention effects on high-frequency oscillations could potentially offer insights into the differential (e.g., anatomical and frequency-specific) contribution of both bottom-up and top-down processes toward visual processing abnormalities in ScZ.
Visual perception, high-frequency oscillations in ScZ and translational research
One important issue concerns the possibility of distinct roles of beta and gamma-band oscillations during visual processing. Recent research have highlighted that beta-band oscillations mediate mainly top down activity and hence are critically involved in the prediction of upcoming sensory events while gamma-band oscillations, at least in sensory cortices, are involved in feed-forward signalling (Buschman and Miller, 2007; Arnal and Giraud, 2012). This distinction is supported by the differential laminar expression of beta and gamma-band oscillations. In vitro and in vivo recordings show that gamma-band activity is prominently generated in superficial layers 2/3 of the cortex (Buffalo et al., 2011), the main origin of feed- forward connections, and dependent upon fast, transient excitation of fast-spiking interneurons via metabotropic glutamate receptors (Whittington et al., 1995). In contrast, beta oscillations are mainly found in infragranular layers, from which feed-back projections originate preferentially. Interestingly, the generation of beta-band oscillations can be independent from excitatory or inhibitory synaptic transmission (Roopun et al., 2008). These observations provide potential hypotheses for future studies to investigate the differential contribution of beta/gamma-band oscillations during visual processing in ScZ. In particular, these investigations could be combined with the investigation of attention effects to address the potentially distinct roles of feed-forward vs. top-down mediated neuronal activity in perceptual dysfunctions in the disorder.
In addition to the modulation of beta/gamma-band power and synchrony, changes in the oscillatory peak-frequency may also be useful in establishing links between non-invasive EEG/MEG-measures and E/I-balance parameters (see Spencer et al., 2004; Ferrarelli et al., 2012). It is conceivable that the frequency at which a network oscillates may more closely mirror biophysical parameters of the underlying network. For example, the deactivation kinetics of different GABAergic receptors strongly impact on the generation of fast vs. slow GABAergic currents which in turn are an important parameters for the frequency of oscillations (Wang and Buzsáki, 1996). Additionally, the peak-frequency of visually induced gamma-band activity in MEG-data has been shown to be under close genetic control (van Pelt et al., 2012), indicating that the frequency of gamma-band oscillations could be linked to genetically determined differences in channel-subunits.
Furthermore, mechanistic links between disturbed oscillations and visual perception in ScZ may also be established in combination with rhythmic stimulation through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Available evidence suggests that oscillatory brain processes can be entrained, enhanced or perturbed by means of external stimulation (Romei et al., 2011; Thut et al., 2011a,b; Antal and Paulus, 2013), which raises the possibility of targeting specific oscillations frequencies in conjunction with visuo-perceptual processes in patients ScZ. The feasibility of using TMS, for example, to probe neural circuits in ScZ has been demonstrated in several recent studies (Ferrarelli et al., 2012; Frantseva et al., 2012).
Finally, future research should also consider the overlap in visually elicited high-frequency dysfunctions with related disorders, such as bipolar (BP) and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). There is substantial evidence that ASDs are characterized by impairments in visual processing as well as deficits in high-frequency oscillations (Dakin and Frith, 2005; Sun et al., 2012). Similarly, there is evidence for impairments in bipolar disorder because auditory-steady state responses (O'Donnell et al., 2004) as well as long-range coherence (Özerdem et al., 2010) at gamma-band frequencies are significantly impaired.
Given the substantial overlap in genes, cognitive deficits and clinical symptoms between different diagnostic categories, it also conceivable that neural oscillations can be used to assign patients into novel categories based on neural oscillations. Fingerprints of neuronal dynamics, such as alterations in the frequency, temporal precision, phase locking, and topology of neuronal oscillations, during visual processing provide a rich coding-space for the definition of discrete entities or taxon (Meehl, 1992) within and also between diagnostic categories. As such, the close links between genes, neurobiology, and parameters (Figure 2) are perhaps well-suited to identify pathways mediated by risk genes.
Beta/gamma-band oscillations and low-frequency activity
While the current review focused on activity at beta/gamma-band frequencies, activity in lower frequencies ranges (e.g., delta, theta, alpha bands) may also be potential targets for understanding visual dysfunctions in ScZ. Existing evidence from EEG-studies suggests impaired amplitude and phase-locking during visual stimulation is not confined to beta/gamma-band frequencies (Haenschel et al., 2010; Hamm et al., 2012).
The alpha-band rhythm (8–12 Hz) is particularly relevant for the understanding of visual perception as the alpha cycle modulates perceptual detection rates (Valera et al., 1981; Dugué et al., 2011). Moreover, there is consistent evidence that oscillations in the alpha-band interact with the amplitude of gamma activity through cross-frequency coupling (Osipova et al., 2008), raising the possibility that impairments in high-frequency activity could also result from an impaired hierarchical organization of oscillations.
In addition to cross-frequency interactions, there is growing consensus that lower-frequency rhythms also play an important role in coordinating sensory predictions within and between modalities (see Schroeder and Lakatos, 2009 for a review). Recent work by Lakatos et al. (2013) demonstrated that impaired sensory discrimination of auditory stimuli in ScZ-patients was correlated with a deficit in effectively entraining inter-trial delta phase-locking to anticipate relevant sensory processing, and a failure to suppress task-irrelevant activity. These findings highlight the potential relevance of sensory predictions for auditory processing impairments in ScZ. It remains to be investigated whether predictive mechanisms in the visual domain are similarly affected in ScZ.
Methodological implications
While it is possible that alterations in high-frequency oscillations during visual processing may reflect dysfunctions in specific variables involved in the generation of high-frequency activity, we cannot exclude the possibility that several non-specific factors, such as the impact of antipsychotic medication, chronic stress and the non-neuronal origin of certain EEG/MEG-signal components, contribute toward findings of impaired beta/gamma-band oscillations in ScZ patients. Accordingly, advances in analytic techniques and experimental designs are essential in order to allow clearer links between changes in high-frequencies oscillations and visuo-perceptual deficits in ScZ.
An approach to further identify such relationships is to employ single-trial analysis of EEG/MEG-data in combination with variation of stimulus parameters. At present, EEG/MEG-studies investigating high-frequency oscillations in ScZ have predominantly concentrated on differences in amplitude and peak-frequency values calculated across conditions or groups of participants. Given the substantial variability in behavioral and electrophysiological parameters both within and between groups, analysis of single-trial EEG/MEG-data analyses could potentially yield additional information as it allows a systematic mapping between brain activity and stimulus information as well as with indexes of behavioral variability (Pernet et al., 2011).
Furthermore, high-frequency oscillations during visual stimulation are accompanied by several important sources of artifacts which can resemble neuronally generated gamma band oscillations, and thus make the interpretation of EEG/MEG-signals difficult. Specifically, induced gamma-band activity coincides with the maximal frequency of micro-saccades which elicit a saccadic spike potential (SSP). Seminal work by (Yuval-Greenberg et al., 2008) highlighted that the SSP can mimic gamma oscillations in bandpass-filtered EEG signals if artifact-correction procedures are not adequately employed (Melloni et al., 2009). The presence of SSP-related gamma-band activity has also been recently demonstrated in MEG-recordings (Carl et al., 2012). Additionally, muscle artifacts can constitute another non-neuronal source of high-frequency activity that, if not carefully removed, can simulate power modulations in the gamma band range over visual regions (Whitham et al., 2007; see also Hipp and Siegel, 2013; Muthukumaraswamy, 2013 for recent reviews of these issues).
In addition to the contribution of eye-movement related artifacts toward high-frequency signals, a potentially important issue is also the relationship between neural oscillations, eye-movements, and visual dysfunctions. Abnormalities in the several eye-movement parameters such as smooth pursuit, fixation stability, scan-path, and fixation dispersal during free viewing are one of the more robust domains of impairments in ScZ-patients (e.g., Benson et al., 2012). Moreover, recent findings suggest that patterns of saccades strongly modulate the occurrence of high-frequency oscillations in V1 (Bosman et al., 2009) and that different oscillatory frequencies are involved in the organization of eye-movement patterns (Ito et al., 2011). Indeed, disentangling the relationship between high-frequency oscillations, eye-movements, and visual processing dysfunctions will be an important albeit challenging area of research.
Summary
The findings reviewed suggest a potential link between the occurrence of beta/gamma oscillations and the pronounced deficits in visual perception in ScZ. Evidence supporting such a relationship comes from EEG/MEG studies indicating reductions in synchrony and amplitude of beta/gamma-band oscillations during basic and complex visual stimuli as well through anatomical findings that highlight impaired structure and composition of visual circuits in the disorder. Importantly, given the known mechanisms involved in the genesis of high-frequency oscillations, the evidence and clinical importance of visual dysfunctions in ScZ, as well as the opportunity to measure high-frequency oscillations non-invasively, visually elicited high-frequency oscillations in ScZ are potentially suited for translational research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
- Adjamian P., Hadjipapas A., Barnes G. R., Hillebrand A., Holliday I. E. (2008). Induced Gamma activity in primary visual cortex is related to luminance and not color contrast: an MEG study. J. Vis. 8, 1–7 10.1167/8.7.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adjamian P., Holliday I. E., Barnes G. R., Hillebrand A., Hadjipapas A., Singh K. D. (2004). Induced visual illusions and gamma oscillations in human primary visual cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20, 587–592 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03495.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adrian E. D. (1950). The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2, 377–388 10.1016/0013-4694(50)90075-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akbarian S., Huang H. (2006). Molecular and cellular mechanisms of altered GAD1/GAD67 expression in schizophrenia and related disorders. Brain Res. Rev. 52, 293–304 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akbarian S., Kim J. J., Potkin S. G., Hagman J. O., Tafazzoli A., Bunney W. E. J., et al. (1995). Gene expression for glutamic acid decarboxylase is reduced without loss of neurons in prefrontal cortex of schizophrenics. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 52, 258–266 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950160008002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antal A., Paulus W. (2013). Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:317 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anver H., Ward P. D., Magony A., Vreugdenhil M. (2011). NMDA receptor hypofunction phase couples independent γ-oscillations in the rat visual cortex. Neuropsychopharmacol. 36, 519–528 10.1038/npp.2010.183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnal L. H., Giraud A. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 16, 390–398 10.1016/j.tics.2012.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnfred S. M. H., Mørup M., Thalbitzer J., Jansson L., Parnas J. (2011). Attenuation of beta and gamma oscillations in schizophrenia spectrum patients following hand posture perturbation. Psychiatry Res. 185, 215–224 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnone D., Cavanagh J., Gerber D., Lawrie S. M., Ebmeier K. P., McIntosh A. M. (2009). Magnetic resonance imaging studies in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 195, 194–201 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartos M., Vida I., Jonas P. (2007). Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 45–56 10.1038/nrn2044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belforte J. E., Zsiros V., Sklar E. R., Jiang Z., Yu G., Li Y., et al. (2010). Postnatal NMDA receptor ablation in corticolimbic interneurons confers schizophrenia-like phenotypes. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 76–83 10.1038/nn.2447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benson P. J., Beedie S. A., Shephard E., Giegling I., Rujescu D., St. Clair D. (2012). Simple viewing tests can detect eye movement abnormalities that distinguish schizophrenia cases from controls with exceptional accuracy. Biol. Psychiatry 72, 716–724 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bleuler E. (1969). Dementia Praecox; or, the Group of Schizophrenias. Transl. Joseph Zinkin; foreword by Nolan C. D. Lewis. (New York, NY: International Universities Press; Originally published in 1911). [Google Scholar]
- Bosman C., Schoffelen J., Brunet N., Oostenveld R., Bastos A., Womelsdorf T., et al. (2012). Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas. Neuron 75, 875–888 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bosman C. A., Womelsdorf T., Desimone R., Fries P. (2009). A microsaccadic rhythm modulates gamma-band synchronization and behavior. J. Neurosci. 29, 9471–9480 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1193-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bramon E., Rabe-Hesketh S., Sham P., Murray R. M., Frangou S. (2004). Meta-analysis of the P300 and P50 waveforms in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 70, 315–329 10.1016/j.schres.2004.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bressler S. L., Freeman W. J. (1980). Frequency analysis of olfactory system EEG in cat, rabbit, and rat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 50, 19–24 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90319-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buffalo E. A., Fries P., Landman R., Buschman T. J., Desimone R. (2011). Laminar differences in gamma and alpha coherence in the ventral stream. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 11262–11267 10.1073/pnas.1011284108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Busch N. A., Debener S., Kranczioch C., Engel A. K., Herrmann C. S. (2004). Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1810–1820 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buschman T. J., Miller E. K. (2007). Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science 315, 1860–1862 10.1126/science.1138071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butler P. D., Javitt D. C. (2005). Early-stage visual processing deficits in schizophrenia. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 18, 151–157 10.1097/00001504-200503000-00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butler P. D., Martinez A., Foxe J. J., Kim D., Zemon V., Silipo G., et al. (2007). Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments. Brain 130, 417–430 10.1093/brain/awl233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butler P. D., Silverstein S. M., Dakin S. C. (2008). Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 64, 40–47 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buzsaki G., Leung L. W., Vanderwolf C. H. (1983). Cellular bases of hippocampal EEG in the behaving rat. Brain Res. 287, 139–171 10.1016/0165-0173(83)90037-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buzsáki G., Wang X. (2012). Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 203–225 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cardin J. A., Carlen M., Meletis K., Knoblich U., Zhang F., Deisseroth K., et al. (2009). Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature 459, 663–667 10.1038/nature08002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carl C., Açık A., König P., Engel A. K., Hipp J. F. (2012). The saccadic spike artifact in MEG. Neuroimage 59, 1657–1667 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlén M., Meletis K., Siegle J. H., Cardin J. A., Futai K., et al. (2012). A critical role for NMDA receptors in parvalbumin interneurons for gamma rhythm induction and behavior. Mol. Psychiatry 17, 537–548 10.1038/mp.2011.31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlson G. C., Talbot K., Halene T. B., Gandal M. J., Kazi H. A., Schlosser L., et al. (2011). Dysbindin-1 mutant mice implicate reduced fast-phasic inhibition as a final common disease mechanism in schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 962–970 10.1073/pnas.1109625108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chamberlain S. E. L., Jane D. E., Jones R. S. G. (2012). Pre- and post-synaptic functions of kainate receptors at glutamate and GABA synapses in the rat entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus 22, 555–576 10.1002/hipo.20921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaumon M., Schwartz D., Tallon-Baudry C. (2009). Unconscious learning versus visual perception: dissociable roles for gamma oscillations revealed in MEG. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 2287–2299 10.1162/jocn.2008.21155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y. (2011). Abnormal visual motion processing in schizophrenia: a review of research progress. Schizophr. Bull. 37, 709–715 10.1093/schbul/sbr020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cho R. Y., Konecky R. O., Carter C. S. (2006). Impairments in frontal cortical γ synchrony and cognitive control in schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 19878–19883 10.1073/pnas.0609440103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clasen L. S., Giedd J. N., Gochman P. A., Gogtay N., Greenstein D., Lenane M., et al. (2003). Structural brain MRI abnormalities in healthy siblings of patients with childhood-onset schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 160, 569–571 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.3.569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dakin S., Frith U. (2005). Vagaries of visual perception in autism. Neuron 48, 497–507 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dias E. C., Butler P. D., Hoptman M. J., Javitt D. C. (2011). Early sensory contributions to contextual encoding deficits in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 654–664 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Russo F., Martínez A., Sereno M. I., Pitzalis S., Hillyard S. A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 95–111 10.1002/hbm.10010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Russo F., Pitzalis S., Aprile T., Spitoni G., Patria F., Stella A., et al. (2007). Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 323–334 10.1002/hbm.20276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doniger G. M., Foxe J. J., Murray M. M., Higgins B. A., Javitt D. C. (2002). Impaired visual object recognition and dorsal/ventral stream interaction in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 59, 1011–1020 10.1001/archpsyc.59.11.1011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dorph-Petersen K., Pierri J. N., Wu Q., Sampson A. R., Lewis D. A. (2007). Primary visual cortex volume and total neuron number are reduced in schizophrenia. J. Comp. Neurol. 501, 290–301 10.1002/cne.21243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dugué L., Marque P., VanRullen R. (2011). The phase of ongoing oscillations mediates the causal relation between brain excitation and visual perception. J. Neurosci. 31, 11889–11893 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1161-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edden R. A. E., Muthukumaraswamy S. D., Freeman T. C. A., Singh K. D. (2009). Orientation discrimination performance is predicted by gaba concentration and gamma oscillation frequency in human primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 29, 15721–15726 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4426-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engel A. K., Konig P., Kreiter A. K., Singer W. (1991). Interhemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex. Science 252, 1177–1179 10.1126/science.252.5009.1177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng W., Havenith M. N., Wang P., Singer W., Nikolic D. (2010). Frequencies of gamma/beta oscillations are stably tuned to stimulus properties. Neuroreport 21, 680–684 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833ae9d1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferrarelli F., Sarasso S., Guller Y., Riedner B. A., Peterson M. J., Bellesi M., et al. (2012). Reduced natural oscillatory frequency of frontal thalamocortical circuits in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69, 766–774 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisahn A., Neddens J., Yan L., Buonanno A. (2009). Neuregulin-1 modulates hippocampal gamma oscillations: implications for schizophrenia. Cereb. Cortex 19, 612–618 10.1093/cercor/bhn107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ford J. M. (1999). Schizophrenia: the broken P300 and beyond. Psychophysiology 36, 667–682 10.1111/1469-8986.3660667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foxe J. J., Doniger G. M., Javitt D. C. (2001). Early visual processing deficits in schizophrenia: impaired P1 generation revealed by high-density electrical mapping. Neuroreport 12, 3815–3820 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foxe J. J., Murray M. M., Javitt D. C. (2005). Filling-in in schizophrenia: a high-density electrical mapping and source-analysis investigation of illusory contour processing. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1914–1927 10.1093/cercor/bhi069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foxe J. J., Strugstad E., Sehatpour P., Molholm S., Pasieka W., Schroeder C. E., et al. (2008). Parvocellular and Magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the ‘C1’ component. Brain Topogr. 21, 11–21 10.1007/s10548-008-0063-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frantseva M., Cui J., Farzan F., Chinta L. V., Perez Velazquez J. L., Daskalakis Z. J. (2012). Disrupted cortical conductivity in schizophrenia: TMS–EEG study. Cereb. Cortex. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1093/cercor/bhs304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman W. J. (1991). The physiology of perception. Sci. Am. 264, 78–85 10.1038/scientificamerican0291-78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freeman W. J., Skarda C. A. (1985). Spatial EEG patterns, non-linear dynamics and perception: the neo-sherringtonian view. Brain Res. Rev. 10, 147–175 10.1016/0165-0173(85)90022-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedman-Hill S., Maldonado P. E., Gray C. M. (2000). Dynamics of striate cortical activity in the alert macaque: I. Incidence and stimulus-dependence of gamma-band neuronal oscillations. Cereb. Cortex 10, 1105–1116 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fries P., Nikolic D., Singer W. (2007). The gamma cycle. Trends Neurosci. 30, 309–316 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fries P., Reynolds J. H., Rorie A. E., Desimone R. (2001). Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science 291, 1560–1563 10.1126/science.1055465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fründ I., Schadow J., Busch N. A., Körner U., Herrmann C. S. (2007). Evoked γ oscillations in human scalp EEG are test–retest reliable. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 221–227 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frund I., Schadow J., Busch N. A., Naue N., Korner U., Herrmann C. S. (2008). Anticipation of natural stimuli modulates EEG dynamics: physiology and simulation. Cogn. Neurodyn. 2, 89–100 10.1007/s11571-008-9043-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genc E., Bergmann J., Tong F., Blake R., Singer W., Kohler A. (2011). Callosal connections of primary visual cortex predict the spatial spreading of binocular rivalry across the visual hemifields. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:161 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gieselmann M. A., Thiele A. (2008). Comparison of spatial integration and surround suppression characteristics in spiking activity and the local field potential in macaque V1. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28, 447–459 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06358.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez-Burgos G., Lewis D. A. (2012). NMDa receptor hypofunction, parvalbumin-positive neurons, and cortical gamma oscillations in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 38, 950–957 10.1093/schbul/sbs010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray C. M. (1999). The temporal correlation hypothesis of visual feature integration: still alive and well. Neuron 24, 31–47 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80820-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray C. M., Engel A. K., König P., Singer W. (1990). Stimulus-dependent neuronal oscillations in cat visual cortex: receptive field properties and feature dependence. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2, 607–619 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00450.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray C. M., Konig P., Engel A. K., Singer W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338, 334–337 10.1038/338334a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green M. F., Lee J., Wynn J. K., Mathis K. I. (2011). Visual masking in schizophrenia: overview and theoretical implications. Schizophr. Bull. 37, 700–708 10.1093/schbul/sbr051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green M. F., Mintz J., Salveson D., Nuechterlein K. H., Breitmeyer B., Light G. A., et al. (2003). Visual masking as a probe for abnormal gamma range activity in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 53, 1113–1119 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01813-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green M. F., Nuechterlein K. H., Breitmeyer B. (1997). Backward masking performance in unaffected siblings of schizophrenic patients: evidence for a vulnerability indicator. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 54, 465–472 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830170091012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green M. F., Nuechterlein K. H., Breitmeyer B., Mintz J. (1999). Backward masking in unmedicated schizophrenic patients in psychotic remission possible reflection of aberrant cortical oscillation. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 1367–1373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green M. F., Nuechterlein K. H., Mintz J. (1994). Backward masking in schizophrenia and mania: I. specifying a mechanism. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 51, 939–944 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950120011003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gross J., Kujala J., Hamalainen M., Timmermann L., Schnitzler A., Salmelin R. (2001). Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 694–699 10.1073/pnas.98.2.694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gruber T., Trujillo-Barreto N. J., Giabbiconi C., Valdés-Sosa P. A., Müller M. M. (2006). Brain electrical tomography (BET) analysis of induced gamma band responses during a simple object recognition task. Neuroimage 29, 888–900 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grützner C., Uhlhaas P. J., Genc E., Kohler A., Singer W., Wibral M. (2010). Neuroelectromagnetic correlates of perceptual closure processes. J. Neurosci. 30, 8342–8352 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5434-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grützner C., Wibral M., Sun L., Rivolta D., Singer W., Maurer K., et al. (2013). Deficits in high- (>60 Hz) gamma-band oscillations during visual processing in schizophrenia. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:88 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hadjipapas A., Adjamian P., Swettenham J. B., Holliday I. E., Barnes G. R. (2007). Stimuli of varying spatial scale induce gamma activity with distinct temporal characteristics in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 35, 518–530 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haenschel C., Bittner R. A., Waltz J., Haertling F., Wibral M., Singer W., et al. (2009). Cortical oscillatory activity is critical for working memory as revealed by deficits in early-onset schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 29, 9481–9489 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1428-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haenschel C., Linden D. E., Bittner R. A., Singer W., Hanslmayr S. (2010). Alpha phase locking predicts residual working memory performance in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 68, 595–598 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall M., Taylor G., Sham P., Schulze K., Rijsdijk F., Picchioni M., et al. (2011). The early auditory gamma-band response is heritable and a putative endophenotype of schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 37, 778–787 10.1093/schbul/sbp134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamm J. P., Gilmore C. S., Clementz B. A. (2012). Augmented gamma band auditory steady-state responses: support for NMDA hypofunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 138, 1–7 10.1016/j.schres.2012.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamm J. P., Gilmore C. S., Picchetti N. A. M., Sponheim S. R., Clementz B. A. (2011). Abnormalities of neuronal oscillations and temporal integration to low- and high-frequency auditory stimulation in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 69, 989–996 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.11.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison P. J., Weinberger D. R. (2004). Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 40–68 10.1038/sj.mp.4001558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hashimoto T., Volk D. W., Eggan S. M., Mirnics K., Pierri J. N., Sun Z., et al. (2003). Gene expression deficits in a subclass of GABA neurons in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 23, 6315–6326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hashimoto T. M. D., Bazmi H. H. M. S., Mirnics K. M. D., Wu Q. P. D., Sampson A. R. P. D., Lewis D. A. M. D. (2008). Conserved regional patterns of GABA-related transcript expression in the neocortex of subjects with schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 479–489 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07081223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Havenith M. N., Yu S., Biederlack J., Chen N., Singer W., Nikolić D. (2011). Synchrony makes neurons fire in sequence, and stimulus properties determine who is ahead. J. Neurosci. 31, 8570–8584 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2817-10.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrmann C. S. (2001). Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Exp. Brain Res. 137, 346–353 10.1007/s002210100682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrmann C. S., Mecklinger A., Pfeifer E. (1999). Gamma responses and ERPs in a visual classification task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 636–642 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00002-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrmann C. S., Munk M. H. J., Engel A. K. (2004a). Cognitive functions of gamma-band activity: memory match and utilization. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 8, 347–355 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrmann M. J., Ellgring H., Fallgatter A. J. (2004b). Early-stage face processing dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 915–917 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.5.915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hillyard S. A., Vogel E. K., Luck S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1257–1270 10.1098/rstb.1998.0281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hipp J. F., Engel A. K., Siegel M. (2011). Oscillatory synchronization in large-scale cortical networks predicts perception. Neuron 69, 387–396 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hipp J. F., Siegel M. (2013). Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:338 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong L. E., Summerfelt A., Mitchell B. D., McMahon R. P., Wonodi I. B., Robert W., Thaker G. K. (2008). Sensory gating endophenotype based on its neural oscillatory pattern and heritability estimate. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 65, 1008–1016 10.1001/archpsyc.65.9.1008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong L. E., Summerfelt A., Buchanan R. W., O'Donnell P., Thaker G. K., Weiler M. A., et al. (2010). Gamma and delta neural oscillations and association with clinical symptoms under subanesthetic ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 632–640 10.1038/npp.2009.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt M. J., Falinska M., Łȩski S., Wójcik D. K., Kasicki S. (2011). Differential effects produced by ketamine on oscillatory activity recorded in the rat hippocampus, dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens. J. Psychopharmacol. 25, 808–821 10.1177/0269881110362126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutton S. B., Murphy F. C., Joyce E. M., Rogers R. D., Cuthbert I., Barnes T. R. E., et al. (2002). Decision making deficits in patients with first-episode and chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 55, 249–257 10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00216-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito J., Maldonado P., Singer W., Grün S. (2011). Saccade-related modulations of neuronal excitability support synchrony of visually elicited spikes. Cereb. Cortex 21, 2482–2497 10.1093/cercor/bhr020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Javitt D. C. (2009). When doors of perception close: bottom-up models of disrupted cognition in schizophrenia. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 5, 249–275 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia X., Smith M. A., Kohn A. (2011). Stimulus selectivity and spatial coherence of gamma components of the local field potential. J. Neurosci. 31, 9390–9403 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0645-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia X., Tanabe S., Kohn A. (2013a). Gamma and the coordination of spiking activity in early visual cortex. Neuron 77, 762–774 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia X., Xing D., Kohn A. (2013b). No consistent relationship between gamma power and peak frequency in macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 33, 17–25 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1687-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson S. C., Lowery N., Kohler C., Turetsky B. I. (2005). Global–Local visual processing in schizophrenia: evidence for an early visual processing deficit. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 937–946 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahlbrock N., Butz M., May E. S., Schnitzler A. (2012). Sustained gamma band synchronization in early visual areas reflects the level of selective attention. Neuroimage 59, 673–681 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawaguchi Y., Kubota Y. (1997). GABAergic cell subtypes and their synaptic connections in rat frontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 7, 476–486 10.1093/cercor/7.6.476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kegeles L. S., Mao X. S., Arielle D., Girgis R., Ojeil N., Xu X., et al. (2012). Elevated prefrontal cortex [gamma]-aminobutyric acid and glutamate-glutamine levels in schizophrenia measured in vivo with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69, 449–459 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keil A., Müller M. M., Ray W. J., Gruber T., Elbert T. (1999). Human gamma band activity and perception of a gestalt. J. Neurosci. 19, 7152–7161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kéri S., Kelemen O., Benedek G., Janka Z. (2001). Different trait markers for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a neurocognitive approach. Psychol. Med. 31, 915–922 10.1017/S0033291701004068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim D., Wylie G., Pasternak R., Butler P. D., Javitt D. C. (2006). Magnocellular contributions to impaired motion processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 82, 1–8 10.1016/j.schres.2005.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirov G., Pocklington A. J., Holmans P., Ivanov D., Ikeda M., Ruderfer D., et al. (2012). De novo CNV analysis implicates specific abnormalities of postsynaptic signalling complexes in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 17, 142–153 10.1038/mp.2011.154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kittelberger K., Hur E., Sazegar S., Keshavan V., Kocsis B. (2012). Comparison of the effects of acute and chronic administration of ketamine on hippocampal oscillations: relevance for the NMDA receptor hypofunction model of schizophrenia. Brain Struct. Funct. 217, 395–409 10.1007/s00429-011-0351-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klosterkötter J., Hellmich M., Steinmeyer E. M., Schultze-Lutter F. (2001). DIagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 58, 158–164 10.1001/archpsyc.58.2.158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koelewijn L., Rich A. N., Muthukumaraswamy S. D., Singh K. D. (2013). Spatial attention increases high-frequency gamma synchronisation in human medial visual cortex. Neuroimage 79, 295–303 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kopell N., Kramer M. A., Malerba P., Whittington M. A. (2010). Are different rhythms good for different functions? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4:187 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraepelin E. (1971). Dementia Praecox and Paraphrenia. Huntington, NY: R. E. Krieger Pub. Co. (Originally published in 1919). [Google Scholar]
- Kreiter A., Singer W. (1996). Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 16, 2381–2396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krishnan G. P., Vohs J. L., Hetrick W. P., Carroll C. A., Shekhar A., Bockbrader M. A., et al. (2005). Steady state visual evoked potential abnormalities in schizophrenia. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 614–624 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kwon J. S., O'Donnell B. F., Wallenstein G. V., Greene R. W., Hirayasu Y., Nestor P. G., et al. (1999). Gamma frequency–range abnormalities to auditory stimulation in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 56, 1001–1005 10.1001/archpsyc.56.11.1001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lachaux J. P., Chavez M., Lutz A. (2003). A simple measure of correlation across time, frequency and space between continuous brain signals. J. Neurosci. Methods 123, 175–188 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00358-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lachaux J. P., George N., Tallon-Baudry C., Martinerie J., Hugueville L., Minotti L., et al. (2005). The many faces of the gamma band response to complex visual stimuli. Neuroimage 25, 491–501 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lachaux J. P., Rodriguez E., Martinerie J., Varela F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 194–208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lakatos P., Schroeder C. E., Leitman D. I., Javitt D. C. (2013). Predictive suppression of cortical excitability and its deficit in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 33, 11692–11702 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0010-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalor E. C., De Sanctis P., Krakowski M. I., Foxe J. J. (2012). Visual sensory processing deficits in schizophrenia: is there anything to the magnocellular account? Schizophr. Res. 139, 246–252 10.1016/j.schres.2012.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis D. A. (2000). GABAergic local circuit neurons and prefrontal cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. Brain Res. Rev. 31, 270–276 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00042-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis D. A., Curley A. A., Glausier J. R., Volk D. W. (2012). Cortical parvalbumin interneurons and cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Trends Neurosci. 35, 57–67 10.1016/j.tins.2011.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis D. A., Fish K. N., Arion D., Gonzalez-Burgos G. (2011). Perisomatic inhibition and cortical circuit dysfunction in schizophrenia. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 866–872 10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis D. A., Hashimoto T., Volk D. W. (2005). Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 312–324 10.1038/nrn1648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lima B., Singer W., Chen N., Neuenschwander S. (2010). Synchronization dynamics in response to plaid stimuli in monkey V1. Cereb. Cortex 20, 1556–1573 10.1093/cercor/bhp218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lima B., Singer W., Neuenschwander S. (2011). Gamma responses correlate with temporal expectation in monkey primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 31, 15919–15931 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0957-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lukatch H. S., Kiddoo C. E., MacIver M. B. (2005). Anesthetic-induced burst suppression EEG activity requires glutamate-mediated excitatory synaptic transmission. Cereb. Cortex 15, 1322–1331 10.1093/cercor/bhi015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lutzenberger W., Pulvermüller F., Elbert T., Birbaumer N. (1995). Visual stimulation alters local 40-Hz responses in humans: an EEG-study. Neurosci. Lett. 183, 39–42 10.1016/0304-3940(94)11109-V [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mann E. O., Paulsen O. (2007). Role of GABAergic inhibition in hippocampal network oscillations. Trends Neurosci. 30, 343–349 10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinez A., Anllo-Vento L., Sereno M. I., Frank L. R., Buxton R. B., Dubowitz D. J., et al. (1999). Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 364–369 10.1038/7274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martinovic J., Busch N. A. (2011). High frequency oscillations as a correlate of visual perception. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 79, 32–38 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meehl P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. J. Pers. 60, 117–174 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00269.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Melloni L., Molina C., Pena M., Torres D., Singer W., Rodriguez E. (2007). Synchronization of neural activity across cortical areas correlates with conscious perception. J. Neurosci. 27, 2858–2865 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4623-06.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melloni L., Schwiedrzik C. M., Rodriguez E., Singer W. (2009). (Micro)Saccades, corollary activity and cortical oscillations. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 13, 239–245 10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merigan W. H., Maunsell J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 369–402 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minzenberg M. J., Firl A. J., Yoon J. H., Gomes G. C., Reinking C., Carter C. S. (2010). Gamma oscillatory power is impaired during cognitive control independent of medication status in first-episode schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 2590–2599 10.1038/npp.2010.150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mirnics K., Middleton F. A., Marquez A., Lewis D. A., Levitt P. (2000). Molecular characterization of schizophrenia viewed by microarray analysis of gene expression in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 28, 53–67 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00085-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mooney C. M., Ferguson G. A. (1951). A new closure test. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 5, 129–133 10.1037/h0083540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muthukumaraswamy S. (2013). High-frequency brain activity and muscle artifacts in MEG/EEG: a review and recommendations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:138 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muthukumaraswamy S. D., Singh K. D. (2008). Spatiotemporal frequency tuning of BOLD and gamma band MEG responses compared in primary visual cortex. Neuroimage 40, 1552–1560 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muthukumaraswamy S. D., Singh K. D. (2013). Visual gamma oscillations: the effects of stimulus type, visual field coverage and stimulus motion on MEG and EEG recordings. Neuroimage 69, 223–230 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muthukumaraswamy S. D., Singh K. D., Swettenham J. B., Jones D. K. (2010). Visual gamma oscillations and evoked responses: variability, repeatability and structural MRI correlates. Neuroimage 49, 3349–3357 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nikolić D., Fries P., Singer W. (2013). Gamma oscillations: precise temporal coordination without a metronome. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 17, 54–55 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nowak L. G., Bullier J. (1997). The timing of information transfer in the visual system, in Cerebral Cortex. Extrastriate Cortex in Primates, Vol. 12, eds Rockland K. S., Kaas J. H., Peters A. (New York, NY: Plenum Press; ), 205–241 [Google Scholar]
- Núñez D., Rauch J., Herwig K., Rupp A., Andermann M., Weisbrod M., et al. (2013). Evidence for a magnocellular disadvantage in early-onset schizophrenic patients: a source analysis of the N80 visual-evoked component. Schizophr. Res. 144, 16–23 10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Donnell B. F., Vohs J. L., Hetrick W. P., Carroll C. A., Shekhar A. (2004). Auditory event-related potential abnormalities in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 53, 45–55 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Tuathaigh C. M. P., Babovic D., O'Meara G., Clifford J. J., Croke D. T., Waddington J. L. (2007). Susceptibility genes for schizophrenia: characterisation of mutant mouse models at the level of phenotypic behaviour. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 31, 60–78 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onitsuka T. M. D., Niznikiewicz M. A. P. D., Spencer K. M. P. D., Frumin M. M. D., Kuroki N. M. D., Lucia L. C. B. S., et al. (2006). Functional and structural deficits in brain regions subserving face perception in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 163, 455–462 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.3.455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oribe N., Hirano Y., Kanba S., del Re E. C., Seidman L. J., Mesholam-Gately R., et al. (2013). Early and late stages of visual processing in individuals in prodromal state and first episode schizophrenia: an ERP study. Schizophr. Res. 146, 95–102 10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osipova D., Hermes D., Jensen O. (2008). Gamma power is phase-locked to posterior alpha activity. PLoS ONE 3:e3990 10.1371/journal.pone.0003990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Özerdem A., Güntekin B., Saatçi E., Tunca Z., Başar E. (2010). Disturbance in long distance gamma coherence in bipolar disorder. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 34, 861–865 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palanca B. J., DeAngelis G. C. (2005). Does neuronal synchrony underlie visual feature grouping? Neuron 46, 333–346 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pernet C. R., Sajda P., Rousselet G. A. (2011). Single-trial analyses: why bother? Front. Psychol. 2:322 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perry G., Hamandi K., Brindley L. M., Muthukumaraswamy S. D., Singh K. D. (2013). The properties of induced gamma oscillations in human visual cortex show individual variability in their dependence on stimulus size. Neuroimage 68, 83–92 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips K. G., Cotel M. C., McCarthy A. P., Edgar D. M., Tricklebank M., O'Neill M. J., et al. (2012). Differential effects of NMDA antagonists on high frequency and gamma EEG oscillations in a neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia. Neuropharmacology 62, 1359–1370 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Place E. J. S., Gilmore G. C. (1980). Perceptual organization in schizophrenia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 89, 409–418 10.1037/0021-843X.89.3.409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Plomp G., Roinishvili M., Chkonia E., Kapanadze G., Kereselidze M., Brand A., et al. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for ventral stream deficits in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr. Bull. 39, 547–554 10.1093/schbul/sbr175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray S., Maunsell J. H. R. (2010). Differences in gamma frequencies across visual cortex restrict their possible use in computation. Neuron 67, 885–896 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ray S., Ni A. M., Maunsell J. H. R. (2013). Strength of gamma rhythm depends on normalization. PLoS Biol. 11:e1001477 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Revonsuo A., Wilenius-Emet M., Kuusela J., Lehto M. (1997). The neural generation of a unified illusion in human vision. Neuroreport 8, 3867–3870 10.1097/00001756-199712220-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roach B. J., Mathalon D. H. (2008). Event-related EEG time-frequency analysis: an overview of measures and an analysis of early gamma band phase locking in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 34, 907–926 10.1093/schbul/sbn093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts M., Lowet E., Brunet N., Ter Wal M., Tiesinga P., Fries P., et al. (2013). Robust gamma coherence between macaque V1 and V2 by dynamic frequency matching. Neuron 78, 523–536 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez E., George N., Lachaux J. P., Martinerie J., Renault B., Varela F. J. (1999). Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature 397, 430–433 10.1038/17120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romei V., Driver J., Schyns P. G., Thut G. (2011). Rhythmic TMS over parietal cortex links distinct brain frequencies to global versus local visual processing. Curr. Biol. 21, 334–337 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roopun A. K., Cunningham M. O., Racca C., Alter K., Traub R. D., Whittington M. A. (2008). Region-specific changes in gamma and beta2 rhythms in NMDA receptor dysfunction models of schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 34, 962–973 10.1093/schbul/sbn059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ross C. A., Margolis R. L., Reading S. A. J., Pletnikov M., Coyle J. T. (2006). Neurobiology of schizophrenia. Neuron 52, 139–153 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salinas E., Thier P. (2000). Gain modulation: a major computational principle of the central nervous system. Neuron 27, 15–21 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00004-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sannita W. G., Lopez L., Piras C., Di Bon G. (1995). Scalp-recorded oscillatory potentials evoked by transient pattern-reversal visual stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96, 206–218 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00285-M [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sauvé K. (1999). Gamma-band synchronous oscillations: recent evidence regarding their functional significance. Conscious. Cogn. 8, 213–224 10.1006/ccog.1999.0383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schadow J., Lenz D., Thaerig S., Busch N. A., Fründ I., Rieger J. W., et al. (2007). Stimulus intensity affects early sensory processing: visual contrast modulates evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 66, 28–36 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schechter I., Butler P. D., Silipo G., Zemon V., Javitt D. C. (2003). Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to backward masking dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 64, 91–101 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00008-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schechter I., Butler P. D., Zemon V. M., Revheim N., Saperstein A. M., Jalbrzikowski M., et al. (2005). Impairments in generation of early-stage transient visual evoked potentials to magno- and parvocellular-selective stimuli in schizophrenia. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116, 2204–2215 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder C. E., Lakatos P. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci. 32, 9–18 10.1016/j.tins.2008.09.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder C. E., Mehta A. D., Givre S. J. (1998). A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. Cereb. Cortex 8, 575–592 10.1093/cercor/8.7.575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selemon L. D., Goldman-Rakic P. S. (1999). The reduced neuropil hypothesis: a circuit based model of schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 45, 17–25 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00281-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selemon L. D., Rajkowska G., Goldman-Rakic P. S. (1995). Abnormally high neuronal density in the schizophrenic cortex: a morphometric analysis of prefrontal area 9 and occipital area 17. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 52, 805–818 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950220015005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shadlen M. N., Movshon J. A. (1999). Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24, 67–77 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80822-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siegel M., Donner T. H., Oostenveld R., Fries P., Engel A. K. (2008). Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention. Neuron 60, 709–719 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverstein S. M., Knight R. A., Schwarzkopf S. B., West L. L., Osborn L. M., Kamin D. (1996). Stimulus configuration and context effects in perceptual organization in schizophrenia. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 105, 410–420 10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 24, 49–65, 111–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer W., Gray C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 555–586 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sohal V. S., Zhang F., Yizhar O., Deisseroth K. (2009). Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance. Nature 459, 698–702 10.1038/nature07991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spencer K. M. (2009). The functional consequences of cortical circuit abnormalities on gamma oscillations in schizophrenia: insights from computational modeling. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3:33 10.3389/neuro.09.033.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spencer K. M., Nestor P. G., Niznikiewicz M. A., Salisbury D. F., Shenton M. E., McCarley R. W. (2003). Abnormal neural synchrony in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 23, 7407–7411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spencer K. M., Nestor P. G., Perlmutter R., Niznikiewicz M. A., Klump M. C., Frumin M., et al. (2004). Neural synchrony indexes disordered perception and cognition in schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 17288–17293 10.1073/pnas.0406074101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spencer K. M., Niznikiewicz M. A., Shenton M. E., McCarley R. W. (2008). Sensory-evoked gamma oscillations in chronic schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 63, 744–747 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Staal W. G., Pol H. E. H., Schnack H. G., Hoogendoorn M. L. C., Jellema K., Kahn R. S. (2000). Structural brain abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia and their healthy siblings. Am. J. Psychiatry 157, 416–421 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Straub R. E., Jiang Y., MacLean C. J., Ma Y., Webb B. T., Myakishev M. V., et al. (2002). Genetic variation in the 6p22.3 Gene DTNBP1, the human ortholog of the mouse dysbindin gene, is associated with schizophrenia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 337–348 10.1086/341750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Streit M., Ioannides A., Sinnemann T., Wolwer W., Dammers J., Zilles K., et al. (2001). Disturbed facial affect recognition in patients with schizophrenia associated with hypoactivity in distributed brain regions: a magnetoencephalographic study. Am. J. Psychiatry 158, 1429–1436 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Streit M., Ioannides A. A., Liu L., Wölwer W., Dammers J., Gross J., et al. (1999). Neurophysiological correlates of the recognition of facial expressions of emotion as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Cogn. Brain Res. 7, 481–491 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00048-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan P. F., Kendler K. S., Neale M. C. (2003). Schizophrenia as a complex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 60, 1187–1192 10.1001/archpsyc.60.12.1187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun L., Grützner C., Bölte S., Wibral M., Tozman T., Schlitt S., et al. (2012). Impaired gamma-band activity during perceptual organization in adults with autism spectrum disorders: evidence for dysfunctional network activity in frontal-posterior cortices. J. Neurosci. 32, 9563–9573 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1073-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swettenham J. B., Muthukumaraswamy S. D., Singh K. D. (2009). Spectral properties of induced and evoked gamma oscillations in human early visual cortex to moving and stationary stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 1241–1253 10.1152/jn.91044.2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tadin D., Kim J., Doop M. L., Gibson C., Lappin J. S., Blake R., et al. (2006). Weakened center-surround interactions in visual motion processing in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 26, 11403–11412 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2592-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tallon C., Bertrand O., Bouchet P., Pernier J. (1995). Gamma-range activity evoked by coherent visual stimuli in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 1285–1291 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb01118.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tallon-Baudry C. (2009). The roles of gamma-band oscillatory synchrony in human visual cognition. Front. Biosci. 1:321–332 10.2741/3246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tallon-Baudry C., Bertrand O. (1999). Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 151–162 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01299-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tallon-Baudry C., Bertrand O., Delpuech C., Pernier J. (1996). Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J. Neurosci. 16, 4240–4249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tallon-Baudry C., Bertrand O., Delpuech C., Pernier J. (1997). Oscillatory γ-Band (30–70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. J. Neurosci. 17, 722–734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tallon-Baudry C., Bertrand O., Hénaff M., Isnard J., Fischer C. (2005). Attention modulates gamma-band oscillations differently in the human lateral occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus. Cereb. Cortex 15, 654–662 10.1093/cercor/bhh167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thiele A., Stoner G. (2003). Neuronal synchrony does not correlate with motion coherence in cortical area MT. Nature 421, 366–370 10.1038/nature01285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thut G., Schyns P. G., Gross J. (2011a). Entrainment of perceptually relevant brain oscillations by non-invasive rhythmic stimulation of the human brain. Front. Psychol. 2:170 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thut G., Veniero D., Romei V., Miniussi C., Schyns P., Gross J. (2011b). Rhythmic TMS Causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures. Curr. Biol. 21, 1176–1185 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiesinga P. H., Fellous J., Salinas E., José J. V., Sejnowski T. J. (2004a). Inhibitory synchrony as a mechanism for attentional gain modulation. J. Physiol. Paris 98, 296–314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiesinga P. H. E., Fellous J., Salinas E., José J. V., Sejnowski T. J. (2004b). Synchronization as a mechanism for attentional gain modulation. Neurocomputing 58–60, 641–646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tobimatsu S., Celesia G. G. (2006). Studies of human visual pathophysiology with visual evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 1414–1433 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Traub R. D., Bibbig A., LeBeau F. E. N., Buhl E. H., Whittington M. A. (2004). Cellular mechanisms of neural population oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 247–278 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turetsky B. I., Kohler C. G., Indersmitten T., Bhati M. T., Charbonnier D., Gur R. C. (2007). Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia:When and why does it go awry? Schizophr. Res. 94, 253–263 10.1016/j.schres.2007.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tzelepi A., Bezerianos T., Bodis-Wollner I. (2000). Functional properties of sub-bands of oscillatory brain waves to pattern visual stimulation in man. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111, 259–269 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00248-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlhaas P., Singer W. (2012). Neuronal dynamics and neuropsychiatric disorders: toward a translational paradigm for dysfunctional large-scale networks. Neuron 75, 963–980 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlhaas P. J., Linden D. E. J., Singer W., Haenschel C., Lindner M., Maurer K., et al. (2006a). Dysfunctional long-range coordination of neural activity during gestalt perception in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 26, 8168–8175 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlhaas P. J., Phillips W. A., Mitchell G., Silverstein S. M. (2006b). Perceptual grouping in disorganized schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 145, 105–117 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlhaas P. J., Mishara A. L. (2007). Perceptual anomalies in schizophrenia: integrating phenomenology and cognitive neuroscience. Schizophr. Bull. 33, 142–156 10.1093/schbul/sbl047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlhaas P. J., Pipa G., Lima B., Melloni L., Neuenschwander S., Nikolic D., et al. (2009). Neural synchrony in cortical networks: history, concept and current status. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 3:17 10.3389/neuro.07.017.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlhaas P. J., Silverstein S. M. (2005). Perceptual organization in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: empirical research and theoretical implications. Psychol. Bull. 131, 618–632 10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uhlhaas P. J., Singer W. (2006). Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron 52, 155–168 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valera F. J., Toro A., Roy John E., Schwartz E. L. (1981). Perceptual framing and cortical alpha rhythm. Neuropsychologia 19, 675–686 10.1016/0028-3932(81)90005-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Essen D. C., Gallant J. L. (1994). Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system. Neuron 13, 1–10 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90455-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Pelt S., Boomsma D. I., Fries P. (2012). Magnetoencephalography in twins reveals a strong genetic determination of the peak frequency of visually induced gamma-band synchronization. J. Neurosci. 32, 3388–3392 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5592-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varela F. J., Lachaux J. P., Rodriguez E., Martinerie J. (2001). The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 229–239 10.1038/35067550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vidal J. R., Chaumon M., O'Regan J. K., Tallon-Baudry C. (2006). Visual grouping and the focusing of attention induce gamma-band oscillations at different frequencies in human magnetoencephalogram signals. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1850–1862 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volk D., Austin M., Pierri J., Sampson A., Lewis D. (2001). GABa transporter-1 mRNA in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: decreased expression in a subset of neurons. Am. J. Psychiatry 158, 256–265 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volman V., Behrens M. M., Sejnowski T. J. (2011). Downregulation of parvalbumin at cortical GABA synapses reduces network gamma oscillatory activity. J. Neurosci. 31, 18137–18148 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3041-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Buzsáki G. (1996). Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model. J. Neurosci. 16, 6402–6413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White T., Magnotta V. A., Bockholt H. J., Williams S., Wallace S., Ehrlich S., et al. (2011). Global white matter abnormalities in schizophrenia: a multisite diffusion tensor imaging study. Schizophr. Bull. 37, 222–232 10.1093/schbul/sbp088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitford T. J., Kubicki M., Ghorashi S., Schneiderman J. S., Hawley K. J., McCarley R. W., et al. (2011a). Predicting inter-hemispheric transfer time from the diffusion properties of the corpus callosum in healthy individuals and schizophrenia patients: a combined ERP and DTI study. Neuroimage 54, 2318–2329 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitford T. J., Kubicki M., Shenton M. E. (2011b). Diffusion tensor imaging, structural connectivity, and schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. Treat. 2011:709523 10.1155/2011/709523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitham E. M., Pope K. J., Fitzgibbon S. P., Lewis T., Clark C. R., Loveless S., et al. (2007). Scalp electrical recording during paralysis: quantitative evidence that EEG frequencies above 20 Hz are contaminated by EMG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 1877–1888 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whittington M. A., Traub R. D., Jefferys J. G. R. (1995). Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature 373, 612–615 10.1038/373612a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Womelsdorf T., Fries P. (2007). The role of neuronal synchronization in selective attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 154–160 10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wyart V., Tallon-Baudry C. (2008). Neural dissociation between visual awareness and spatial attention. J. Neurosci. 28, 2667–2679 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4748-07.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wyart V., Tallon-Baudry C. (2009). How ongoing fluctuations in human visual cortex predict perceptual awareness: baseline shift versus decision bias. J. Neurosci. 29, 8715–8725 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0962-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wynn J. K., Lee J., Horan W. P., Green M. F. (2008). Using event related potentials to explore stages of facial affect recognition deficits in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 34, 679–687 10.1093/schbul/sbn047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wynn J. K. P. D., Light G. A. P. D., Breitmeyer B. P. D., Nuechterlein K. H. P. D., Green M. F. P. D. (2005). Event-related gamma activity in schizophrenia patients during a visual backward-masking task. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 2330–2336 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang E., Tadin D., Glasser D. M., Hong S. W., Blake R., Park S. (2013). Visual context processing in schizophrenia. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 1, 5–15 10.1177/2167702612464618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeap S. M. R. C. P., Kelly S. P., Sehatpour P., Magno E., Javitt D. C., Garavan H., et al. (2006). Early visual sensory deficits as endophenotypes for schizophrenia: high-density electrical mapping in clinically unaffected first-degree relatives. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63, 1180–1188 10.1001/archpsyc.63.11.1180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoon J. H., Maddock R. J., Rokem A., Silver M. A., Minzenberg M. J., Ragland J. D., et al. (2010). GABA concentration is reduced in visual cortex in schizophrenia and correlates with orientation-specific surround suppression. J. Neurosci. 30, 3777–3781 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6158-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuval-Greenberg S., Tomer O., Keren A. S., Nelken I., Deouell L. Y. (2008). Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades. Neuron 58, 429–441 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]