Pathophysiology, epidemiology, classification and treatment options for polycystic liver diseases

Abstract

Polycystic liver diseases (PLD) represent a group of genetic disorders in which cysts occur in the liver (autosomal dominant polycystic liver disease) or in combination with cysts in the kidneys (autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease). Regardless of the genetic mutations, the natural history of these disorders is alike. The natural history of PLD is characterized by a continuous increase in the volume and the number of cysts. Both genders are affected; however, women have a higher prevalence. Most patients with PLD are asymptomatic and can be managed conservatively. Severe symptoms can affect 20% of patients who develop massive hepatomegaly with compression of the surrounding organs. Rrarely, patients with PLD suffer from acute complications caused by the torsion of hepatic cysts, intraluminal cystic hemorrhage and infections. The most common methods for the diagnosis of PLD are cross sectional imaging studies. Abdominal ultrasound and computerized tomography are the two most frequently used investigations. Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive and specific, and it is a valuable test for patients with intravenous contrast allergies or renal dysfunction. Different treatment modalities are available to physicians caring for these patients. Medical treatment has been ineffective. Percutaneous sclerotherapy, trans-arterial embolization, cyst fenestration, hepatic resection and liver transplantation are indicated to specific groups of patients and have to be tailored according to the extent of disease. This review outlines the current knowledge of the pathophysiology, clinical course, diagnosis and treatment strategies of PLD.

Core tip: The management of patients with symptomatic polycystic liver disease is challenging. Among several treatments options, the most common interventions are: percutaneous cyst aspiration, fenestration, hepatic resection and liver transplantation. There is no consensus on the best treatment options and the optimal timing for interventions in symptomatic patients. In vision of these limitations, we reviewed the most recent literature and present a comprehensive article on this topic.

INTRODUCTION

The association between polycystic liver disease (PLD) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) was described for the fist time by Bristowe in 1856[1,2]. Initially, it was thought that PLD could develop only in the context of ADPKD[3]. The notion that isolated PLD might be a separate condition was proposed in the 1950’s[4]. In 2003, a linkage analysis of eight Finnish families confirmed that PLD is genetically distinct from ADPKD[5]. Asymptomatic patients usually do not require any intervention[6]. In some patients, massive hepatomegaly can cause pain or compression of the adjacent gastrointestinal organs, vasculature, and diaphragm. This can have a significant effect on patients’ quality of life and performance status[6,7]. For these patients, the main aim is to reduce their symptoms by decreasing the liver volume[8-10]. Current surgical options include open or laparoscopic cyst fenestration with or without hepatic resection and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Significant advances in surgical techniques have improved the outcomes of PLD patients. However, the selection of the appropriate approach remains a clinical challenge, and there is no consensus on the optimal timing and what represents the best therapeutic modality.

INCIDENCE AND GENETICS

ADPKD affects up to 0.2% of the general population[11]. On the other hand, isolated PLD has prevalence of less than 0.01%[12]. Both ADPKD and PLD are autosomal dominant and 75%-90% of patients with ADPKD have associated PLD[13]. In humans, PLD has been linked to mutations of four genes. Two genes (PKD1, locus 16p13.3, encoding polycystin-1 and PKD2, locus 4q21, and encoding polycystin-2) are predominantly associated with renal disease and less frequently with PLD. PKD1 mutations are more common and account for 85%-90% of the cases, whereas mutations in PKD2 affect approximately 10%-15% of patients[11]. The remaining two mutations (PRKCSH, locus 19p13.2, encoding the protein kinase C substrate 80K-H or hepatocystin and SEC63, locus 6q21, encoding the Sec63 protein) are linked only to the development of PLD[11]. However, these mutations explain just 25% to 40% of cases of PLD[14,15]. Comparative characteristics between ADPKD and PLD are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Comparative epidemiological and genetic mutation characteristics of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease associated polycystic liver disease and isolated polycystic liver disease

Characteristics	ADPKD associated PLD	Isolated PLD
Prevalence	0.20%	< 0.01%
Type of inheritance	AD	AD
Gene mutated	PKD1; PKD2	PRKCSH; SEC63
Encoded product	Polycystin-1; Polycystin-2	Hepatocystin; Sec63 protein
Chromosome locus	216p13.3; 4q21	19p13.2; 6q21

AD: Autosomal dominant; ADPKD: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; PLD: Polycystic liver disease.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Malformation of the hepatic ductal plate and cilia of cholangiocytes is the main characteristic linked to the pathophysiology of PLD (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Pathophysiology of polycystic liver disease. PLD: Polycystic liver disease.

DUCTAL-PLATE MALFORMATION

The ductal plate is the anatomical template for the development of the intra-hepatic bile ducts[16]. Normal bile ducts arise from the ductal plate through a complex sequence of growth and apoptosis. Complexes of disconnected intralobular bile ductules (von Meyenburg complexes) are retained because they do not undergo apoptosis in PLD[10]. As a consequence, multiple cysts arise from progressive dilatation of these abnormal ductules[17-19] that display the same epithelium and structures of functioning cholangiocytes[20,21].

ABNORMAL PRIMARY CILIA

Cholangiocytes are the only ciliated cells in the liver. Cilia have mechanosensory capacity and modulate the intracellular levels of cAMP and Ca²⁺ when bent by the flow of bile. They also detect changes in osmolarity and composition of the bile[22-24]. Ciliary defects result in a decreased cytoplasmic level of Ca²⁺ and an increased cytoplasmic level of cAMP[25]. These changes are responsible for the hyperproliferation of cholangiocytes and for the cystogenesis that is a consequence of the altered balance between fluid secretion and absorption in the lumen of the biliary ducts[25].

NATURAL HISTORY AND RISK FACTORS FOR PLD

The natural history of PLD is characterized by a continuous increase in the volume and the number of cysts[11,26,27]. The annual growth of affected livers is in the range of 0.9%-3.2% of the initial hepatic volume[10,28-30]. Both genders are affected; however, women have a higher prevalence. Exposure to estrogen during pregnancies, the use of oral contraceptive pills or estrogen replacement therapy seems to accelerate the progression of the disease[1,27,31]. Other risk factors are the severity of renal dysfunction that is dependent on the volume of the cysts in the kidneys[1]. Table 2 summarizes the known factors that influence the progression of PLD.

Table 2.

Risk factors for liver-cyst growth in polycystic liver disease

Risk factors for liver-cyst growth in polycystic liver disease
Advancing patient age
Female gender
Estrogen exposure: multiple pregnancies, OCPs, estrogen replacement therapy
Severity of renal dysfunction and renal cyst volume

OCPs: Oral contraceptive pills.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

PLD is asymptomatic in 80% of patients[8,9] and is usually diagnosed incidentally. Women present with massive and symptomatic cystic liver more frequently than men[32]. For 20% of patient, symptoms are typically caused by the compression of organs surrounding the liver, bleeding or infectious complications of the cysts. Compressive symptoms include abdominal distention, early satiety that can lead to decreased oral intake and severe malnutrition, gastro-esophageal reflux, dyspnea, hepatic venous-outflow obstruction (Budd-Chiari syndrome), inferior vena cava syndrome, portal-vein and bile-duct compression. Complications of liver cysts include infections, torsions, rupture and hemorrhage[1,18,33,34] (Table 3). In asymptomatic patients, serum laboratory studies are usually normal. In the presence of symptoms, 47% of patients have elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, 70% have elevated serum levels of gamma glutamil transferase[35-38], 27% have elevated serum levels of aspartate amino transferase and 15% have elevated serum levels of total bilirubin[35,36]. Liver synthetic function is typically preserved despite the presence of innumerable cysts[32] while 45% of patients might have elevated serum tumor marker CA19-9 without proof of malignancy[39]. Other tumor markers such as CA-125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and alpha-fetoprotein may also be elevated but less frequently than CA19-9[40-42].

Table 3.

Summary of the most frequent symptoms caused by polycystic liver disease

Symptoms due to mass effect	Symptoms due to complications of the cysts
Abdominal distention	Infection
Early satiety	Torsion
Postprandial fullness	Rupture
Gastro-oesophageal reflux	Haemorrhage
Malnutrition
Dyspnoea
Hepatic venous-outflow obstruction (Budd-Chiari syndrome)
Inferior vena cava syndrome
Portal-vein compression
Bile-duct compression

ASSOCIATED EXTRA-HEPATIC DISEASES

Intracranial arterial aneurysms can affect 6% of patients without a family history of ADPKD and up to 16% of patients with family history of ADPKD. Other common conditions are mitral-valve prolapse and colonic diverticulosis that can be detected in 25% of patients with PLD[1,11,43-45]. Screening for intracranial aneurysm by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is recommended only for patients with ADPKD, older than 30 years or for those patients with family history of hemorrhagic strokes or intracranial arterial aneurysms[46]. Screening for intracranial arterial aneurysms is also warranted in cases of a sudden severe headache, or for candidates to liver or kidney transplantation. Screening for mitral-valve prolapse is not recommended unless a cardiac murmur is ascultated during routine clinical examinations[11,47]. Finally, patients with ADPKD may have asymptomatic cysts within other organs, such as the pancreas, spleen, ovaries, and lungs[48]. Pancreatic cysts are the most common with a reported incidence of 9% among ADPKD patients older than 30 years[49-51].

DIAGNOSIS

The most common methods for the diagnosis of PLD are cross sectional imaging studies. Abdominal ultrasound (US) and computerized tomography (CT) are the two most frequent investigations[52,53]. For hepatic cysts, MRI is more sensitive and specific, and it is a valuable test for patients with intravenous contrast allergies or renal dysfunction or when other studies are unable to satisfy the diagnostic needs[54]. Hepatic cysts have radiological characteristics identical to benign developmental cysts. On US, they appear anechoic and well-circumscribed[55]. On CT and MRI, they have non-enhancing, well-circumscribed round walls with hypodense content[55]. On T2-weighted MRI and CT scans, they appear homogenously enhanced spherical lesions[55] (Figure 2B and C). The distinction between isolated PLD and ADPKD relies on the number of renal cysts, age at presentation and family history (Table 4). In adults, younger than 30 years with a positive family history, the diagnosis of ADPKD is established by radiologic evidence of at least two unilateral or bilateral cysts. At least two cysts in each kidney are necessary for the diagnosis of patients between the age of 30 to 59 years, and at least four cysts in each kidney for patients 60 years or older[56]. It is worth noting that at least one third of patients with isolated PLD may also have a few kidney cysts[15,56,57]. It has been proposed that sporadic cases of PLD should be diagnosed when a patient has more than 15 to 20 cysts and no previous family history[1,18] while four cysts suffice in the presence of a positive familial history[1,18].

Figure 2.

Gigot’s classification for polycystic liver diseases. A: Graphical representation; B: Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging of a patient affected by Gigot I cystic liver disease; C: Abdominal computerized tomography of a patient affected by Gigot II cystic liver disease.

Table 4.

The ravine diagnostic criteria for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Patient’s age (yr)	Number of cysts
	Positive family history	Negative family history
≤ 30	At least 2 cysts affecting 1 or both kidneys	At least 5 cysts
31-59	At least 2 cysts in each kidney	At least 5 cysts
≥ 60	At least 4 cysts in each kidney	At least 8 cysts

INFECTED CYSTS

Hepatic cysts may become infected, and cause life-threatening sepsis[58,59]. Often, infected hepatic cysts are responsible for recurrent episodes of fever without any other signs or symptoms. In these circumstances, the diagnosis can be quite difficult as the accuracy of imaging tests remain low due to the altered anatomy of the liver parenchyma[60]. A promising investigation technique for suspected infected hepatic cysts is In-111 WBC scan[61]. Several other tracers such as 99mTc-diphosphonates, 67Gacitrate, and 111In- or 99mTc-labeled leukocytes have also been used[62]. Although labeled leukocyte imaging is theoretically the test of choice for detecting most infections, it is labor intensive, not always available and involves direct handling of potentially infected blood products. Therefore, considerable effort has been devoted to search for alternatives to this procedure such as the use of 67Gallium scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET). In recent years, PET has become the most commonly used diagnostic test for the detection of infected renal and hepatic cysts[60,62,63]. However, the accuracy of this technique is still under investigation. The literature on the treatment of infected cysts in PLD patients is very scarce and based only on a few case reports. Most of patients will need parenteral broad spectrum antibiotic therapy with percutaneous drainage of the content of the cyst if their symptoms persists.

CLASSIFICATION

Several clinical classifications have been proposed to grade the severity of PLD.

GIGOT’S CLASSIFICATION

Gigot’s classification relies on imaging findings and was designed to identify the best candidates for fenestration of symptomatic cysts[38] (Figure 3): Type I: presence of less than 10 large hepatic cysts measuring more than 10 cm in maximum diameter. Type II: diffuse involvement of liver parenchyma by multiple cysts with remaining large areas of non-cystic liver parenchyma. Type III: presence of diffuse involvement of liver parenchyma by small and medium-sized liver cysts with only a few areas of normal liver parenchyma.

Figure 3.

Gigot’s classification relies on imaging findings and was designed to identify the best candidates for fenestration of symptomatic cysts. A: Intravenous contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT) of a patient affected by polycystic liver and renal disease. The cysts appears hypoattenuating with smooth and regular walls; B: T2 magnetic resonance imaging of a patient with multiple hepatic cysts. The cystic fluid appears bright on T2 images; C: Abdominal CT of a patient affected by Gigot III cystic liver disease.

QUIAN’S CLASSIFICATION

Qian’s classification has been used in the context of familial screening and relies on the number of cysts and the presence of symptomatic hepatomegaly[18]: (1) grade 0 - 0 cysts; (2) grade 1 - 1 to 10 cysts; (3) grade 2 - 11 to 20 cysts; (4) grade 3 - more than 20 cysts; and (5) grade 4 - more than 20 cysts and symptomatic hepatomegaly.

SCHNELLDORFER’S CLASSIFICATION

Schnelldorfer’s classification aims at differentiating patients who could benefit from resection or transplantation as summarized in Table 5[64].

Table 5.

Summary of Schnelldorfer’s classification that aims at differentiating patients who could benefit from resection or transplantation

	Type A	Type B	Type C	Type D
Symptoms	Absent or mild	Moderate or severe	Severe (or moderate)	Severe (or moderate)
Cyst characteristics	Any	Limited No. large cysts	Any	Any
Areas of relative normal liver parenchyma	Any	≥ 2 sectors	≥ 1 sector	< 1 sector
Presence of portal vein or hepatic vein occlusion in the preserved hepatic sectors	Any	Absent	Absent	Present
Recommended therapy	Observation or medical therapy	Cyst fenestration	Partial hepatectomy with possible fenestration of remnant cysts	Liver Transplantation

TREATMENT

Most patients with PLD are asymptomatic and do not require any intervention[6]. However, symptomatic PLD patients might require treatment when they experience severe dysfunction of organs around the liver due to the increased hepatic volume or when one or more cysts get torted, infected or develop intra-cystic hemorrhages (Table 6).

Table 6.

Summary of treatment options for polycystic liver disease

Treatment approach	Treatment type
Nonsurgical	Medical
	Somatostatin analogues
	mTOR inhibitors
	Interventional radiology:
	Arterial embolization
	Percutaneous sclerotherapy
Surgical	Fenestration
	Hepatic resection with fenestration
	Liver transplantation

OCP’s: Oral contraceptive pills; mTOR: Mammalian target of rapamycin.

AVOIDANCE OF EXPOSURE TO ESTROGENS

Observational and experimental studies have shown that PLD may worsen under the influence of estrogen during pregnancy or when patients are prescribed estrogen replacement therapy[1,27,31]. Estrogen can increase both the number of liver cysts and their volume, therefore, hormonal therapy should be stopped in most symptomatic patients when appropriate[27].

NON-SURGICAL TREATMENTS

Medical management may be valuable in symptomatic patients with Gigot’s type II/III.

SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUES

Somatostatin analogues are inhibitors of cAMP and they reduce the secretion of fluid and the proliferation of many cell types, including cholangiocytes[65-69]. They also suppress the expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and other cytogenetic growth factors[70]. In addition, somatostatin analogues inhibit the downstream signaling of these receptors[70]. Two randomized controlled trials have recently demonstrated that after 6 to 12 mo, treatment with lanreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analogue, was associated with a significant reduction of liver volume in patients with PLD compared with placebo[28,29]. However, the average hepatic volume reduction was only 3% to 5%. The severity of abdominal symptoms was also not significantly improved[28]. Currently, somatostatin analogues are indicated only for a selected group of patients with symptomatic PLD in whom the risks for surgical intervention are not justified, or in whom the surgical intervention is technically challenging.

MAMMALIAN TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN INHIBITORS

Mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) inhibitors have immunosuppressive and antiproliferative effects[71]. Sirolimus and Everolimus were studied in Phase-II prospective randomised control trials. None of the two drugs showed substantial therapeutic effects both in humans[72-74] and in animal models[75]. Clinical prospective data o the effect of m-TOR inhibitors are currently not available, and this class of medications should not be recommended outside clinical trials.

INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY: ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION

Trans-catheter arterial embolization has been used since the early 2000s[76]. Hepatic artery branches supplying the hepatic segments replaced by the cysts are targeted by using microcoils or polyvinyl alcohol particles measuring 150-250 μm in diameter[76,77]. For patients with advanced PLD and multilobal disease, trans-catheter arterial embolization can be technically demanding. The largest series of patients treated with this modality included 30 patients who had a significant reduction of the volume of their cysts (6.667 ± 2.978 cm³ down to 4.625 ± 2.299 cm³), whereas the volume of the unaffected hepatic parenchyma increased[76]. After several months, patients reported improvement of their symptoms and no major complications except for occasional post-embolization syndrome[76,77].

PERCUTANEOUS SCLEROTHERAPY

This technique requires radiologically guided percutaneous aspiration of the content of the cysts followed by the injection of a sclerosing agent that inhibit the reaccumulation of fluid by damaging the epithelial lining the cystS[78,79]. Symptomatic patients with one to five large dominant cysts (Gigot’s type I) are suitable for percutaneous sclerotherapy. Most commonly, cysts with a diameter larger than 5 cm are candidates for this treatment[10]. Puncturing of the cyst can be done with a 5 or 7 French catheter[80] and sclerosing agents commonly used include ethanol, ethanolamine oleate, minocycline and tetracycline. Although a single session is often sufficient, some patients require more than one[81]. Aspiration with sclerotherapy has an excellent safety profile, although severe abdominal pain can be caused by peritoneal irritation due to spillage of the sclerosing agent[10]. The majority of patients who undergo percutaneous sclerotherapy has improved symptoms in the immediate period following the procedure[10], but only 20% will have partial, or full regression of their disease[10].

SURGERY

Patient and treatment selection remain a clinical challenge. There is no consensus on selection criteria for surgery, the optimal timing, and technique. Current surgical options include fenestration, partial liver resection and OLT. Fenestration and partial liver resection are options for Gigot’s type I and II patients. For Gigot’s type III disease, fenestration and partial liver resection are often ineffective, and OLT should be considered as it is the only curative treatment. In general, several factors have to be considered before any surgical intervention is recommended: (1) The degree of cystic burden; (2) The distribution of the cysts; and (3) The proximity of the cysts to the main biliary ducts and portal and hepatic vein branches.

SURGICAL PEARLS

In Gigot’s type I or II, symptoms might not be related to the size of the entire liver but to the size of one or two large cysts. These patients can be treated similarly to those with simple cysts. Some hepatic segments such as V and VI are frequently spared and, therefore, surgical resection can be performed if the spared liver parenchyma is thought to be sufficient. Frequently, the right hepatic veins are compressed by cysts causing the formation of collateral circulation between the right and the middle hepatic veins that can be responsible for intraoperative bleeding during the parenchymal transaction.

FENESTRATION

Fenestration is a surgical technique that combines aspiration and surgical unroofing of the cyst. It has the advantage that multiple cysts can be treated in one session[48,82]. Fenestration is effective in symptomatic patients with Gigot’s type I and II disease[83]. Patients with superficial and a limited number of large cysts are the best candidates for this procedure[48]. Fenestration may be achieved by laparotomy or laparoscopy[48]. Patients with the majority of their cysts located in the right posterior segments (VI, VII), or at the dome of the liver (segment VIII) may be better candidates for open fenestration because these cysts are difficult to be visualized and fenestrated by laparoscopic approach[48]. Published series describing open and laparoscopic fenestration are summarized in Table 7. Immediate symptom relief is achieved in 92% of the patients, whereas up to 25% experience recurrence of the cysts or symptoms[10]. Complication rate after fenestration is in the range of 23% while mortality is about 2%[10]. Complications include ascites, pleural effusion, hemorrhage and bile leakage[84]. Factors that predict failure of fenestration are previous abdominal procedures, deep-seated cysts, incomplete unroofing, cysts in segments VII-VIII, and the presence of diffuse PLD[10].

Table 7.

Summary of largest series published on the surgical techniques used for cystic fenestration of symptomatic polycystic liver disease

Ref.	No. of patients	Technique	Outcome	Complications	Follow-up (mo)
van Erpecum et al[35]	15	Open fenestration	0% symptom recurrence	One mortality	Mean of 48
Kabbej et al[37]	13	Lap fenestration	72% symptom recurrence	54% morbidity	Mean follow-up 26
Gigot et al[38]	10	Open fenestration	11% symptom recurrence	60% morbidity	73 mean follow-up
van Keimpema et al[82]	12	Lap fenestration	Reduction in liver volume by 12.5%	Bile leak, vena cava occlusion and sepsis	-
Pirenne et al[92]	4	Lap fenestration	100% symptom relief	50% cyst recurrence	-
Liska et al[95]	7	Lap fenestration plus open	-	No mortality	Mean 41
Bai et al[96]	10	Lap fenestration	Symptom and cyst recurrence in 20%	3 patients with minor complications. No mortality	Mean of 57
Palanivelu et al[97]	4	Lap fenestration	100% cyst recurrence	-	-
Garcea et al[98]	6	Lap/Open fenestration	16.7% symptom recurrence, 33.3% cyst recurrence	50% morbidity	5-36
Neri et al[99]	3	Lap fenestration	100% symptom relief	50% morbidity	-
Kornprat et al[100]	8	Lap fenestration	0% symptom recurrence	-	-
Robinson et al[101]	11	Lap fenestration	54.5% symptom recurrence	-	-
Fiamingo et al[102]	6	Lap fenestration	30% symptom recurrence	50% morbidity	1-64
Tocchi et al[103]	18	Lap/open fenestration	-	-	-
Koperna et al[104]	39	Open fenestration (n = 34); Lap (n = 5)	21% symptom recurrence	-	75 mean follow-up
Morino et al[105]	7	Lap fenestration	40% symptom recurrence	44% morbidity rate	-
Farges et al[106]	13	Open fenestration	23% symptom recurrence	69% morbidity	84 follow-up
Ueno et al[118]	13	Open fenestration (n = 6); Lap (n = 13)	71% symptom recurrence	30% morbidity	37 mean follow-up

Lap: Laparoscopic.

HEPATIC RESECTION WITH FENESTRATION

Hepatic resection is usually reserved for highly symptomatic patients who are incapacitated by their disease due to the massive expansion of their livers (Gigot’s type II and III)[38]. In these circumstances fenestration alone is rarely successful because the liver parenchyma is rigid and it does not collapse[10]. Symptom relief is achieved in 86% of cases although cyst recurrence is expected in one third of patients[10]. Overall, most of the patients have an improvement in their quality of life and functional status[36]. The morbidity rate associated with this procedure can be up to 50% and includes ascites, pleural effusions, biliary leakage, and hemorrhage[10]. One of the reasons for these complications is the fact that there is a significant distorsion of the intra-hepatic vasculature and biliary tree which makes these procedures technically very challenging. Mortality rate is around 3%[10]. As subsequent adhesions may complicate future OLT, this surgical treatment is usually preserved for patients with massive hepatomegaly for which OLT is not an option[85,86]. Published series describing hepatic resection with/without fenestration for symptomatic PLD are summarized in Table 8.

Table 8.

Summary of largest series published on the surgical techniques used for cystic fenestration and resection of symptomatic polycystic liver disease

Ref.	No.	Technique	Outcome	Complications	Follow-up (mo)
Que et al[36]	31	Fenestration and resection	3% symptom recurrence	3% mortality, 58% morbidity	Mean of 28
Schnelldorfer et al[64]	124	Fenestration and resection	93% symptom relief, 72.6% recurrent cyst formation	72.6% morbidity, 3.2% mortality	Mean of 48
Kornprat et al[100]	9	Fenestration and resection	100% symptom relief, 11% recurrence	33.35% morbidity	24-98
Koperna et al[104]	5	Fenestration and resection	0% symptom recurrence	-	-
Li et al[107]	21	Fenestration and resection	14.3% cyst recurrence	76.2% cyst morbidity, 0% mortality	10-155
Gamblin et al[108]	51	Fenestration and resection	3.9% symptom recurrence	17.6% morbidity, no mortality	1-49
Yang et al[109]	7	Fenestration and resection	100% symptom recurrence	100% morbidity, no mortality	Mean of 20
Vons et al[110]	12	Resection	17% symptom recurrence	8% mortality, 83% morbidity	Mean of 34
Soravia et al[111]	10	Fenestration and resection	33% symptom recurrence	10% mortality, 20% morbidity	Mean of 69
Henne-Bruns et al[112]	8	Fenestration and resection	50% symptom recurrence	No mortality, 38% morbidity	Mean of 15
Vauthey et al[113]	5	Fenestration and resection	0% symptom recurrence	0% mortality, 100% morbidity	Mean of 14
Sanchez et al[114]	9	Resection	100% symptom relief, 100% recurrence	0% mortality	Mean of 35
Newman et al[115]	9	Fenestration and resection	88.9% symptom relief, 0% recurrence	11.1% mortality, 55.6% morbidity	2-44
Iwatsuki et al[116]	9	Resection	44.4% symptom relief, 44.4% recurrence	0% mortality, 33.3% morbidity	12-180

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

OLT is the only curative treatment for patients with severe PLD[87]. It is indicated in those patients with disabling symptoms that lead to decreased performance status and quality of life[10]. Patients with PLD usually have normal liver function and the current organ allocation system based on the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is often unable to assist this group of patients. For these patients, MELD exception criteria are needed[88,89]. Because of the shortness of available grafts, the need for life-long immunosuppression and the perioperative risks, OLT is indicated only for symptomatic patients with Gigot’s type II and III disease[12,48,90]. For patients undergoing OLT for PLD, perioperative morbidity is 40%-50%, whereas overall mortality is 10%-17%[10]. In 3% of patients, retransplantation is required[10] and combined renal and liver transplantation are necessary in 42% of patients[91,92]. Expected survival at 1- and 5-year are 93% and 92% for patients undergoing OLT alone while for patients who undergo combined liver and kidney transplant are 86% and 80% respectively[10]. Published series reporting the outcomes of OLT for symptomatic PLD are summarized in Table 9.

Table 9.

Summary of largest series published on the outcomes of patients undergoing liver transplantation for symptomatic polycystic liver disease

Ref.	No. of patients	Previous surgery	Combined liver and kidney transplantation	Morbidity	Mortality	Follow-up (mo)	Re-transplantation
Pirenne et al[92]	16	25%	6%	38%	13%	Range 18-120	0%
Taner et al[117]	13	-	54%	85%	31%	-	0%
Ueno et al[118]	14	-	36%	64%	21%	-	0%
Ueda et al[119]	3	-	0	33%	0%	Mean of 32	0%
Gustafsson et al[120]	7	57%	43%	57%	43%	Mean of 4	0%
Swenson et al[121]	9	44%	33%	44%	11%	Mean of 26	11%
Lang et al[122]	17	35%	47%	47%	29%	Mean of 12	12%
Washburn et al[123]	5	90%	20%	0%	20%	Mean of 38	0%
Starzl et al[124]	4	0%	25%	0%	50%	Mean of 38	0%

HEPATIC RESECTION VS LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

The clinical decision between performing a hepatic resection with or without cyst fenestration[93] and referring the patient for OLT can be extremely difficult (Table 10). Hepatic resection with cyst fenestration implies leaving residual hepatic cysts that will eventually progress[94]. However, hepatic resection is associated with a lower risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. OLT provides the only option for the cure of these patients but requires lifelong immunosuppression and has higher perioperative risks. Both resection and OLT are technically demanding, and peri-operative care can be complex. The risks and the benefits of each of the possible treatment options have to be carefully evaluated and put in the contest of the clinical presentation and condition of each patient. Referral to a tertiary center with an experienced team of surgeons, hepatologists, and nephrologists is strongly recommended.

Table 10.

Suggested management strategies based on Gigot’s classification

Gigot’s I	Gigot’s II - III
Percutaneous sclerotherapy	Hepatic resection with fenestration if feasible
Fenestration	Liver transplantation

CONCLUSION

For patients with PLD, patients’ selection, timing and choice of treatments can be very challenging even for experienced physicians. For symptomatic patients, treatment strategies should be based on the degree and progression of their symptoms and the severity of other medical conditions. Symptomatic patients with large cysts or limited hepatic involvement might benefit from fenestration or sclerotherapy. Hepatic resection with or without fenestration should be favored in patients with diffuse involvement of the liver but with sufficient spared parenchyma. Finally, in the patient with diffuse disease, OLT is a valid option and should be pursued as primary therapy prior to the development of debilitating disease such as malnutrition and liver dysfunction that can significantly increase the risks of perioperative adverse events.