Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2013 Mar 1;2:67. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-67.v1

Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses

Cristiane C Thompson 1,a,#, Vanessa E Emmel 1,#, Erica L Fonseca 1, Michel A Marin 1, Ana Carolina P Vicente 1
PMCID: PMC3799547  PMID: 24358875

Abstract

The identification of the clinically relevant viridans streptococci group, at species level, is still problematic. The aim of this study was to extract taxonomic information from the complete genome sequences of 67 streptococci, comprising 19 species, by means of genomic analyses, multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), average amino acid identity (AAI), genomic signatures, genome-to-genome distances (GGD) and codon usage bias. We then attempted to determine the usefulness of these genomic tools for species identification in streptococci. Our results showed that MLSA, AAI and GGD analyses are robust markers to identify streptococci at the species level, for instance, S. pneumoniae, S. mitis, and S. oralis. A Streptococcus species can be defined as a group of strains that share ≥ 95% DNA similarity in MLSA and AAI, and > 70% DNA identity in GGD. This approach allows an advanced understanding of bacterial diversity.

Introduction

Bacteria are subjected to numerous forces driving their diversification. As a consequence, different strains of a single bacterial species sometimes have the ability to explore distinct niches, to be pathogenic or non-pathogenic and to present different metabolic pathways 1, 2. In such a scenario, the identification of bacteria isolates to the species level is a hard task 1, 2.

Currently, the genus Streptococcus comprises 99 recognized species, many of which are associated with disease in humans and animals ( http://www.bacterio.net/s/streptococcus.html). The viridans group streptococci (VGS) encompass four phylogenetic clusters: Mitis, Mutans, Salivarius and Anginosus, which are part of the human microbiota, being isolated mainly from the oral cavity, gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts 3. The Mitis group currently includes the important pathogen S. pneumoniae and 12 other recognized species, S. australis, S. cristatus (formerly S. crista), S. gordonii, S. infantis, S.mitis, S. oligofermentans, S. oralis, S. parasanguinis (formerly S. parasanguis), S. peroris, S. pseudopneumoniae, S. sanguinis (formerly S. sanguis) and S. sinensis. The Anginosus group includes three recognized species, S. anginosus, S. constellatus (including two subspecies S. constellatus subsp. constellatus and S. constellatus pharyngis) and S. intermedius, and the Salivarius group includes S. salivarius, S. vestibularis, and S. thermophilus.

Currently, bacterial species are considered to be a group of strains (including the type strain) that are characterized by a certain degree of phenotypic consistency, showing > 70% DNA-DNA hybridization values and over 97% 16S rRNA sequence similarity 4, 5. Identification of streptococci is based on the current taxonomic standards using a combination of 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses, DNA-DNA hybridization, serologic and phenotypic data; however, they have been strikingly resistant to satisfactory classification, reflected in frequently changing nomenclature 6, 7. For instance, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of S. mitis and S. oralis are almost identical (> 99%) to S. pneumoniae, making the use of this information alone insufficient to distinguish these species 8.

Recent studies have used whole genome analysis to determine the taxonomic relationships among bacterial species 914. In order to determine the robustness of genomic markers in streptococci species delineation, we analyzed a collection of 67 complete genomes. The availability of whole genome sequences of several closely related species, for instance, S. mitis - S. oralis - S. pneumoniae, and S. salivarius - S. thermophilus - S. vestibularis, formed an ideal test case for the establishment of the genomic taxonomy of streptococci.

Material and methods

Genome sequence data

The genomic sequences of 67 streptococci that were publicly available for download by June 2 nd, 2011 at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under the project accession number indicated in Table 1 were used in this study. The following analyses were performed according to Thompson et al. (2009) 13 and are briefly described below.

Table 1. Genomic features of the streptococci.

G+C content (%): guanine + cytosine content (%). No. of CDs: number of coding DNA sequence. Nc: effective number of codons.

Organism GenBank
accession no.
Genome
size (nt)
G+C content
(%)
No. of
CDS
Nc
S. agalactiae A909 CP000114 2,127,839 35 1996 44.9
S. agalactiae NEM316 AL732656 2,211,485 35 2094 45.2
S. agalactiae 2603VR AE009948 2,160,267 35 2124 45.1
S. anginosus F0211 AECT00000000 1,993,709 38 2035 50.6
S. bovis ATCC 700338 AEEL00000000 2,050,893 37 2088 44.5
S. downei F0415 AEKN00000000 2,239,421 43 2204 54.4
S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis GGS-124 AP010935 2,106,340 39 2094 50.3
S. equi subsp. equi 4047 FM204883 2,253,793 41 2001 52.6
S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus FM204884 2,149,868 41 1869 52.4
S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus MGCS10565 CP001129 2,024,171 41 1893 52.3
S. gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus TX20005 AEEM00000000 2,214,091 37 2218 44.5
S. gallolyticus UCN34 FN597254 2,350,911 37 2223 44.4
S. gordonii str. Challis substr. CH1 CP000725 2,196,662 40 2051 52.4
S. infantis SK1302 AEDY00000000 1,792,252 39 2102 48.9
S. infantarius subsp. infantarius ATCC BAA-102 ABJK00000000 1,925,087 37 2051 44.0
S. mitis B6 FN568063 2,146,611 39 2004 50.4
S. mitis SK321 AEDT00000000 1,873,702 40 1757 49.8
S. mutans NN2025 AP010655 2,013,587 36 1895 46.4
S. mutans UA159 AE014133 2,030,921 36 1960 46.5
S. oralis ATCC 35037 AEDW00000000 1,884,712 41 1793 51.4
S. parasanguinis ATCC 15912 ADVN00000000 2,124,730 41 2035 52.8
S. parasanguinis F0405 AEKM00000000 2,050,302 41 1978 52.9
S. pneumoniae AP200 CP002121 2,130,580 39 2216 50.3
S. pneumoniae ATCC 700669 FM211187 2,221,315 39 1990 50.0
S. pneumoniae CGSP14 CP001033 2,209,198 39 2206 50.3
S. pneumoniae D39 CP000410 2,046,115 39 1914 49.8
S. pneumoniae G54 CP001015 2,078,953 39 2114 50.0
S. pneumoniae Hungary19A-6 CP000936 2,245,615 39 2155 50.2
S. pneumoniae INV104 FQ312030 2,142,122 39 1824 49.9
S. pneumoniae INV200 FQ312029 2,093,317 39 1930 50.0
S. pneumoniae JJA CP000919 2,120,234 39 2123 50.2
S. pneumoniae OXC141 FQ312027 2,036,867 39 1824 49.9
S. pneumoniae P1031 CP000920 2,111,882 39 2073 50.1
S. pneumoniae R6 AE007317 2,038,615 39 2042 50.1
S. pneumoniae Taiwan19F-14 CP000921 2,112,148 39 2044 50.1
S. pneumoniae TCH843119A CP001993 2,088,772 39 2275 50.4
S. pneumoniae TIGR4 AE005672 2,160,842 39 2105 50.0
S. pneumoniae 670-6B CP002176 2,240,045 39 2352 50.4
S. pneumoniae 70585 CP000918 2,184,682 39 2202 50.1
S. pseudoporcinus SPIN 20026 AENS00000000 2,111,372 36 2030 48.6
S. pyogenes MGAS315 AE014074 1,900,521 38 1865 49.1
S. pyogenes MGAS2096 CP000261 1,860,355 38 1898 49.4
S. pyogenes MGAS5005 CP000017 1,838,554 38 1865 48.9
S. pyogenes MGAS6180 CP000056 1,897,573 38 1894 48.9
S. pyogenes MGAS8232 AE009949 1,895,017 38 1839 49.0
S. pyogenes MGAS9429 CP000259 1,836,467 38 1877 49.0
S. pyogenes MGAS10270 CP000260 1,928,252 38 1986 49.0
S. pyogenes MGAS10394 CP000003 1,899,877 38 1886 49.2
S. pyogenes MGAS10750 CP000262 1,937,111 38 1979 49.1
S. pyogenes M1 GAS AE004092 1,852,441 38 1696 48.8
S. pyogenes NZ131 CP000829 1,815,785 38 1700 48.8
S. pyogenes SSI-1 BA000034 1,894,275 38 1859 49.1
S. pyogenes str. Manfredo AM295007 1,841,271 38 1745 48.9
S. salivarius SK126 ACLO00000000 2,128,332 40 1992 47.0
S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 AEPO00000000 2,054,852 41 2013 51.7
S. sanguinis SK36 CP000387 2,388,435 43 2270 54.5
S. sanguinis VMC66 AEVH00000000 2,311,949 43 2260 54.5
S. suis BM407 FM252032 2,146,229 41 1932 52.0
S. suis GZ1 CP000837 2,038,034 41 1979 52.4
S. suis P17 AM946016 2,007,491 41 1824 51.9
S. suis SC84 FM252031 2,095,898 41 1898 52.0
S. thermophilus CNRZ1066 CP000024 1,796,226 39 1915 47.0
S. thermophilus LMD-9 CP000419 1,856,368 39 1709 46.8
S. thermophilus LMG 18311 CP000023 1,796,846 39 1888 46.9
S. thermophilus ND03 CP002340 1,831,949 39 1919 46.8
S. uberis 0140J AM946015 1,852,352 36 1762 46.4
S. vestibularis F0396 AEKO00000000 2,022,289 39 1979 47.1

16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA)

The 16S rRNA gene sequences and the gene sequences used for MLSA were obtained from GenBank ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The MLSA approach was based on the concatenated sequences of five house-keeping genes ( aroE, ddl, gki, pheS and recA) 15, 16. The concatenated sequences were aligned with ClustalX program 17. The phylogenetic inference was based on the neighbour-joining genetic distance method (NJ) 18 using MEGA5 19. Distance estimations were obtained according to the Kimura-2-parameter 20 for 16S rRNA gene and MLSA. The reliability of each tree topology was checked by 2000 bootstrap replications 21.

Average amino acid identity (AAI)

The AAI of all conserved protein-coding genes was calculated as described previously 22. Conserved protein-coding genes between a pair of genomes were determined by whole-genome pairwise sequence comparisons using the BLASTp algorithm 23. For these comparisons, all protein-coding sequences (CDSs) from one genome were searched against the genomic sequence of the other genome. The genetic relatedness between a pair of genomes was measured by the AAI of all conserved genes between the two genomes as computed by the BLAST algorithm. By this approach, a value of < 95% AAI of protein-coding genes indicates separate species.

Codon usage

Codon usage bias was calculated for each genome. The effective number of codons used in a sequence ( Nc) 24 was calculated using CHIPS ( http://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/chips) with the default parameters.

Determination of dinucleotide relative abundance values and genomic dissimilarity

Mononucleotide and dinucleotide frequencies were calculated using COMPSEQ ( http://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/compseq) with default parameters. Dinucleotide relative abundances (ρ*XY) were calculated using the equation ρ*XY = fXY/fXfY where fXY denotes the frequency of dinucleotide XY, and fX and fY denote the frequencies of X and Y, respectively. The difference in genome signature between two sequences is expressed by the genomic dissimilarity (δ*), which is the average absolute dinucleotide of relative abundance difference between two sequences, and were calculated using the equation: δ*(f,g) = 1/16Σ|ρ*XY (f) - ρ*XY (g)| (multiplied by 1000 for convenience), where the sum extends over all dinucleotides 25.

Genome-to-genome distances (GGD)

The genome distance was calculated using genome-to-genome distance calculator (GGDC) 26. Distances between a pair of genomes were determined by whole-genome pairwise sequence comparisons using BLAST 23. For these comparisons, algorithms were used to determine high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) for inferring intergenomic distances for species delimitation. The corresponding distance threshold can be used for species delimitation 26.

Results and discussion

In this work we compared complete genomes for 67 streptococci comprising 19 species to address their taxonomic position. A previous study with a small set of streptococci genomes (eight) and species (four), using a combination of several genomic analyses, showed the applicability of this approach in streptococci taxonomy 9. Overall our analysis, using a large data set, showed that genomic taxonomy is an accurate approach to clearly define the streptococci species. The taxonomic resolution of the 16S rRNA, AAI, MLSA, GGD and codon usage analysis for streptococci species definition is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Taxonomic resolution of genomic analyses of streptococci species.

MLSA: multilocus sequence analysis. AAI: amino acid identity. GGD: genome to genome distance. Nc: effective number of codons.

16S rRNA
(%)
MLSA
(%)
AAI
(%)
GGD
(%)
Codon usage
( Nc)
Intraspecies ≥99 ≥95 ≥95 >70 -
S. pyogenes ≥99 ≥98 >97 >70 49
S. agalactiae 99 100 98 >70 45
S. equi 99 98 >96 >70 52
S. suis 100 100 100 >70 52
S. pneumoniae 99 ≥97 >97 >70 50
S.thermophilus 99 100 >97 >70 47
Interspecies ≤99 <95 <95 <70 44-54
S. thermophilus-salivarius-vestibularis 99 <94 <92 <70 47
S. pneumoniae-mitis-oralis >99 <94 <93 <70 50–51
Raw data: MLSA nucleotide sequences

Similarity values for the MLSA nucleotide sequences (lower left) and 16S rRNA gene sequences (upper right) for the Streptococcus strains.

Raw data: average amino acid identiy

Percentage of average amino acid identity (AAI) between Streptococcus strains.

Raw data: genomic signatures

Genomic dissimilarity [δ(f,g)] values between Streptococcus strains.

General genomic features

The complete genome of the streptococci comprised a single chromosome. The estimated size of the genomes ranged from 1.7 Mb ( S. infantis) to 2.3 Mb ( S. sanguinis). The number of CDS varied from 1,700 ( S. pyogenes) to 2,352 ( S. pneumoniae) (Table 1). The average G+C content of streptococci genomes ranged from 35% to 43%. These species presented a variable interspecies genome size and G+C content, indicating heterogeneity within the genus Streptococcus. One of the reasons for this variability could be associated with the frequent occurrence of horizontal gene transfer events 2729.

Phylogenetic reconstructions by 16S rRNA and MLSA

MLSA and 16S rRNA phylogenetic trees showed similar topologies (Figure 1). The MLSA was performed using five instead of the seven genes applied in the pneumococcus multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme ( http://spneumoniae.mlst.net/) 15, 16. Three genes, aroE, ddl and gki, are from the MLST scheme, and pheS and recA were included in this work. The concatenation of these genes (7741 bp) allowed an accurate delineation of the streptococci species considered here. The nucleotide sequence similarities were much lower for MLSA than 16S rRNA gene. A pairwise comparison of MLSA among the species revealed sequence similarity between 67% and 100%, while the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities varied from 92% to 100%. At the intraspecies level, the similarity values ranged from 95% to 100% for MLSA, and 99% to 100% for the 16S rRNA gene sequences. The closest species within the Mitis ( S. pneumoniae - S. oralis - S. mitis) and Salivarius groups ( S. vestibulares - S. salivarius - S. thermophilus) were clearly placed apart from each other by MLSA, while these species had almost identical 16S rRNA gene sequences (≥ 99% sequence similarity). A previously study showed that recA analysis is a valuable tool for proper identification of pneumococci in routine diagnostics, but limitations on discrimination of other members of the Mitis group were observed 30. S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 showed a much closer relationship with S. oralis ATCC 35037T (95% similarity) than to other S. sanguinis strains (77% similarity), suggesting it belongs to the species S. oralis. In addition, S. bovis ATCC 700338 was placed in the S. gallolyticus cluster with 98% MLSA sequence similarity. This work showed that MLSA, using this new combination of five concatenated genes ( aroE, ddl, gki, pheS and recA), distinct from the Streptococcus MLST scheme, allowed a proper identification of most streptococci species, even within the VGS group.

Figure 1. Neighbor-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and MLSA concatenated sequences of Streptococcus.

Figure 1.

The numbers at the nodes indicate the values of bootstrap statistics after 2000 replications, and values below 50% are not shown. Bars, 0.005% and 0.02% estimated sequence divergence.

Average amino acid identity (AAI)

The percentage of average amino acid identity (AAI) among streptococci species ranges from 68% to 94%, while within species it varies from 95% to 100%. The VGS species S. pneumoniae, S. mitis and S. oralis shared 89–93% AAI. The species S. salivarius, S. thermophilus and S. vestibularis showed a maximum AAI of 93%. S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 and S. oralis ATCC 35037 showed 96% identity and S. bovis ATCC 700338 and S. gallolyticus strains had 98% identity. These findings suggest that strains ATCC 49296 and ATCC 700338 belong to the species S. oralis and S. gallolyticus, respectively. According to our analyses the AAI and MLSA are the most useful genomic features for the elucidation of streptococci taxonomy.

Genome signature

The genomic dissimilarity values among streptococci were between 3 and 127, while the intraspecies values were between 0 and 17. Streptococci within the VGS group, for instance, S. salivarius, S. thermophilus and S. vestibularis species, showed dissimilarity values between 5 and 12 and S. pneumoniae, S. mitis and S. oralis species had dissimilarity values between 3 and 14. Thus, there was not a clear differentiation of these closely related species within the VGS group on the basis of the genomic dissimilarity values. This could be due to the extensive recombination and horizontal gene transfer events which occur between closely related streptococci species that share ecological niches 12, 30.

On the other hand, species within the Pyogenic group had a distinct genomic signature, with values ranging from 13 to 85. However, genome signatures alone have significant limitations when used as phylogenetic markers for differentiating members of the VGS. The exact mechanisms that generate and maintain the genome signatures are complex, but possibly involve differences in species-specific compositional bias, i.e., G+C content, G+C and A+T skews, codon bias, and mutation bias 32, 33.

Codon usage bias ( Nc)

Nc values provide a meaningful measure of the extent of codon preference in a genome, values range between 20 (extremely biased genome where one codon is used per amino acid) and 61 (all synonymous codons are used). Within the set of 67 complete streptococci genomes examined in this study, the Nc ranged from 44.0 to 54.5 (Table 1). For instance, S. pneumoniae - S. oralis - S. mitis species had Nc values of 50, 51 and 50, respectively. The Salivarius group ( S. vestibulares - S. salivarius - S. thermophilus), and S. bovis ATCC 700338 - S. gallolyticus showed Nc values of 47 and 44.5, respectively. Overall, codon usage bias was very similar among the streptococci species investigated. However, S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 showed a much closer Nc value with the S. oralis ATCC 35037 (51.7 and 51.4, respectively) than other S. sanguinis strains (54.5), which was in agreement with the other analyses used in this study.

Genome distance analysis

The GGD was calculated only for closely related species that were not differentiated by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Figure 1). Based on GGD analysis the species within the Mitis and Salivarius groups were identified as separate species, showing GGD values analogous to the < 70% discriminatory value used for DNA-DNA hybridization. Conversely, S. bovis ATCC 700338 and S. gallolyticus were identified as belonging to the same species by GGD.

S. bovis ATCC 700338 (biotype II) and S. gallolyticus as well as S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 and S. oralis ATCC 35037T were not separated and, therefore, according to this analysis would be classified as the same species, respectively. It was shown that S. bovis biotype I and II/2 isolates were, in fact, S. gallolyticus 34, and S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 was placed into S. oralis species by GGD analysis. A misidentification of S. sanguinis ATCC 49296 has already been shown by means of biochemical and serological properties by Narikawa and colleagues 35.

Another interesting result is that the S. parasanguinis ATCC 15912 and F0405 strains were found to be at the upper limits for definition as members of the same species based on different genomic analyses. For instance, they shared 95% AAI, 94% identity by MLSA, a value of 17 on the basis of genomic signature and < 70% similarity in GGD. Therefore, based on these genomic markers, these S. parasanguinis strains could, in fact, be separate species. This data reflects the complexity of bacterial species delineation, since these organisms are all under a constant evolutionary process.

Conclusion

The delineation of closely related streptococci species was evident in this genomic study. Different methods produced different levels of taxonomic resolution. The methods with the higher resolution for species identification were MLSA and AAI, while closely related species had similar Nc values and genomic signatures. Based on the genomic analyses, a Streptococcus species can be defined as a group of strains that shares ≥ 95% identity in MLSA and AAI, and > 70% identity in GGD. This definition may be useful to advance the taxonomy of Streptococcus. This approach allows an advanced understanding of bacterial diversity and identification.

Funding Statement

VEE had a PRODOC-CAPES fellowship. CCT has a PNPD-CAPES fellowship, ELF has a PNPD-FAPERJ fellowship and MAM has a CAPES fellowship.

v1; ref status: indexed

References

  • 1.Gevers D, Cohan FM, Lawrence JG, et al. : Opinion: Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(9):733–9 10.1038/nrmicro1236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cohan FM, Koeppel AF: The origins of ecological diversity in prokaryotes. Curr Biol. 2008;18(21):R1024–34 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alam S, Brailsford SR, Whiley RA, et al. : PCR-Based methods for genotyping viridans group streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(9):2772–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM: Taxonomic Note: A place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S ribosomal-RNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44(4):846–849 10.1099/00207713-44-4-846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, et al. : Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987;37(4):463–464 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoshino T, Fujiwara T, Kilian M: Use of phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses to identify nonhemolytic streptococci isolated from bacteremic patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(12):6073–85 10.1128/JCM.43.12.6073-6085.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kawamura Y, Hou XG, Sultana F, et al. : Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45(2):406–8 10.1099/00207713-45-2-406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Suzuki N, Seki M, Nakano Y, et al. : Discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from viridans group streptococci by genomic subtractive hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(9):4528–34 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4528-4534.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coenye T, Vandamme P: Extracting phylogenetic information from whole-genome sequencing projects: the lactic acid bacteria as a test case. Microbiology. 2003;149(pt 12):3507–17 10.1099/mic.0.26515-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coenye T, Gevers D, Van de Peer Y, et al. : Towards a prokaryotic genomic taxonomy. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29(2):147–67 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, et al. : Accuracy of phenotypic methods for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates included in surveillance programs. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(7):2184–8 10.1128/JCM.00461-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Croucher NJ, Harris SR, Fraser C, et al. : Rapid pneumococcal evolution in response to clinical interventions. Science. 2011;331(6016):430–4 10.1126/science.1198545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thompson CC, Vicente ACP, Souza RC, et al. : Genomic taxonomy of Vibrios. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:258 10.1186/1471-2148-9-258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thompson CC, Vieira NM, Vicente AC, et al. : Towards a genome based taxonomy of Mycoplasmas. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11(7):1798–804 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Enright MC, Spratt BG: A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology. 1998;144(Pt 11):3049–60 10.1099/00221287-144-11-3049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hanage WP, Fraser C, Spratt BG: Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;361(1475):1917–27 10.1098/rstb.2006.1917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, et al. : The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(24):4876–82 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al. : MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–9 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16(2):111–120 10.1007/BF01731581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Felsenstein J: Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39(4):783–791 10.2307/2408678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM: Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(18):6258–64 10.1128/JB.187.18.6258-6264.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, et al. : Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389–402 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wright F: The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene. 1990;87(1):23–9 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90491-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Karlin S, Mrázek J, Campbell AM: Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(12):3899–913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M: Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2(1):142–8 10.4056/sigs.541628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang A, Yang M, Hu P, et al. : Comparative genomic analysis of Streptococcus suis reveals significant genomic diversity among different serotypes. BMC genomics. 2011;12:523 10.1186/1471-2164-12-523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bellanger X, Roberts AP, Morel C, et al. : Conjugative transfer of the integrative conjugative elements ICESt1 and ICESt3 from Streptococcus thermophilus. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(8):2764–75 10.1128/JB.01412-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Harvey RM, Stroeher UH, Ogunniyi AD, et al. : A variable region within the genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae contributes to strain-strain variation in virulence. PloS One. 2011;6(5):e19650 10.1371/journal.pone.0019650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zbinden A, Köhler N, Bloemberg GV: recA-based PCR assay for accurate differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from other viridans streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(2):523–7 10.1128/JCM.01450-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Donati C, Hiller NL, Tettelin H, et al. : Structure and dynamics of the pan-genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae and closely related species. Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R107 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Karlin S: Global dinucleotide signatures and analysis of genomic heterogeneity. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1998;1(15):598–610 10.1016/S1369-5274(98)80095-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Foerstner KU, von Mering C, Hooper SD, et al. : Environments shape the nucleotide composition of genomes. EMBO Rep. 2005;6(12):1208–13 10.1038/sj.embor.7400538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Devriese LA, Vandamme P, Pot B, et al. : Differentiation between Streptococcus gallolyticus strains of human clinical and veterinary origins and Streptococcus bovis strains from the intestinal tracts of ruminants. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(12):3520–3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Narikawa S, Suzuki Y, Takahashi M, et al. : Streptococcus oralis previously identified as uncommon "Streptococcus sanguis" in Behçet’s disease. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40(8):685–90 10.1016/0003-9969(95)00042-N [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2013 Apr 3.

Referee response for version 1

Bruno Gomez-Gil 1

The article is well written with an appropriate title and abstract. The methods are adequate for the aims of the study, but I would suggest that including the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis as suggested by Rosello-Mora et al. 2006, would certainly improve the manuscript. The online analysis can be found here  http://www.imedea.uib.es/jspecies/index.html.The conclusions are adequate and the data sufficient to replicate all the analyses.The data are openly accessible at GenBank.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2013 Apr 3.

Referee response for version 1

Tomoo Sawabe 1

  • Title and abstract are good enough to attract readers in the scientific community.

  • Genome based multi-gene sequence comparison is one of the promising tools to analyse bacterial populations. To achieve the analysis for Streptococcus, the authors carefully designed massive data genome analysis. The results are strong enough and supported by the results of the analysis.

  • The conclusion is clear that authors proposed a threshold value on the basis of genome-based MLSA in Streptococcus bacteria.

I have read this submission. I believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Raw data: MLSA nucleotide sequences

    Similarity values for the MLSA nucleotide sequences (lower left) and 16S rRNA gene sequences (upper right) for the Streptococcus strains.

    Raw data: average amino acid identiy

    Percentage of average amino acid identity (AAI) between Streptococcus strains.

    Raw data: genomic signatures

    Genomic dissimilarity [δ(f,g)] values between Streptococcus strains.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES