Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 2013 Oct 1;170(4):796–806. doi: 10.1111/bph.12301

Treatment with resveratrol attenuates sublesional bone loss in spinal cord-injured rats

Hua-Dong Wang 1, Ya-Min Shi 1, Li Li 1, Ji-Dong Guo 1, Yu-Peng Zhang 1, Shu-Xun Hou 1
PMCID: PMC3799594  PMID: 23848300

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Sublesional osteoporosis predisposes individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) to an increased risk of low-trauma fracture. The aim of the present work was to investigate the effect of treatment with resveratrol (RES) on sublesional bone loss in spinal cord-injured rats.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Complete SCI was generated by surgical transaction of the cord at the T10–12 level. Treatment with RES (400 mg·kg−1 body mass per day−1, intragastrically) was initiated 12 h after the surgery for 10 days. Then, blood was collected and femurs and tibiae were removed for evaluation of the effects of RES on bone tissue after SCI.

KEY RESULTS

Treatment of SCI rats with RES prevented the reduction of bone mass including bone mineral content and bone mineral density in tibiae, preserved bone structure including trabecular bone volume fraction, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness in tibiae, and preserved mechanical strength including ultimate load, stiffness, and energy in femurs. Treatment of SCI rats with RES enhanced femoral total sulfhydryl content, reduced femoral malondialdehyde and IL-6 mRNA levels. Treatment of SCI rats with RES suppressed the up-regulation of mRNA levels of PPARγ, adipose-specific fatty-acid-binding protein and lipoprotein lipase, and restored mRNA levels of Wnt1, low-density lipoprotein-related protein 5, Axin2, ctnnb1, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and receptor for IGF-1 in femurs and tibiae.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Treatment with RES attenuated sublesional bone loss in spinal-cord-injured rats, associated with abating oxidative stress, attenuating inflammation, depressing PPARγ signalling, and restoring Wnt/β-catenin and IGF-1 signalling.

Keywords: resveratrol, spinal cord injury, sublesional bone loss, oxidative stress, inflammation, PPARγ, Wnt/β-catenin, IGF-1

Introduction

One of the inevitable consequences of spinal cord injury (SCI) is the significant bone loss within a few months to a few years after trauma (Kocina, 1997). This bone loss leads to fractures in up to 50% of individuals with complete SCI; the most commonly affected sites are long bones of the lower limbs and the trabecular metaphysical-epiphyseal areas of the distal femur and proximal tibiae (Garland et al., 1992; Wilmet et al., 1995; Dauty et al., 2000). SCI-induced bone loss carries significant morbidity and can worsen already profound disability. To prevent bone loss after SCI, many cases are treated with passive standing, low-level electrical stimulation, and body weight-supported treadmill training. However, findings with respect to the effects of these interventions on osteoporosis after SCI are less consistent. Because treatment interventions based on physical activity and electrical stimulation had no sufficient positive effects (Needham-Shropshire et al., 1997; Ben et al., 2005; Giangregorio et al., 2005), pharmacologic therapy seemed to be necessary.

Resveratrol (RES, 3,4′,5-trihydroxystilbene) is a naturally occurring phytoalexin generated in a number of plants including grapes, mulberries, cranberries, and peanuts. Recent studies reported that RES could attenuate neural lesion in rat model of SCI (Yang and Piao, 2003; Liu et al., 2011). RES has recently attracted considerable interest because of its protective effects on multiple events associated with osteoporosis. Treatment with RES delayed age-related bone loss in rats and mice (Pearson et al., 2008) and protected against bone loss induced by oestrogen deficiency (Liu et al., 2005). More importantly, chronic RES supplementation maintained the bone mineral density (BMD) and strength of the femur of rat hindlimb unloading (Momken et al., 2011); prior treatment with RES preserved density and structure of rat long bones under tail-suspension (Habold et al., 2011). It was reported that mechanical unloading might play an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis after SCI (Jiang et al., 2006).

In addition, it was reported that in the early stage both oversupply of osteoclasts relative to the requirement for bone resorption and undersupply of osteoblasts relative to the requirement for cavity repair were involved in the bone loss (Morse et al., 2008; 2011) after SCI. RES was shown to be able to promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs; Zhou et al., 2009; Shakibaei et al., 2012) and inhibit receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-induced osteoclast differentiation of both bone-derived cells and osteoclast progenitor RAW 264.7 cells (He et al., 2010; Shakibaei et al., 2011).

The aim of our study was thus to test RES as a preventive countermeasure against bone loss induced by SCI in rats.

Methods

Animals

Sprague-Dawley (SD, male, 6 weeks old) rats were purchased from the Vital-Aiver Animal Ltd (Beijing, China). All the rats were fed under controlled temperature (21–23°C), 12 h light and 12 h dark cycles (light, 0800–2000 h; darkness, 2000–0800 h), and free access to food and tap water. All the animals used in this study received humane care in compliance with institutional animal care guidelines. All the surgical and experimental procedures were in accordance with institutional animal care guidelines, and were approved by the Local Institutional Committee. All studies involving animals are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals (Kilkenny et al., 2010; McGrath et al., 2010).

Chemicals, drugs and reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated.

The drug/molecular target nomenclature used in this manuscript conforms to British Journal of Pharmacology's Guide to Receptors and Channels (Alexander et al., 2011).

Animal model of SCI

All rats were anaesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of xylazine (10 mg·kg−1 body mass) and ketamine (75 mg·kg−1 body mass). With the back shaved and sterilized, an incision was made on the back posterior to the lower thoracic region. After the back muscles were infiltrated, the dorsal surface of the spinal cord was exposed by laminectomy at the T10–12 levels, and the lower thoracic cord was subsequently completely transected with fine scissors. Two surgeons independently verified a complete transection by passing a glass probe through the site and lifting both cut ends of the spinal cord. A collagen matrix, Vitrogen, was injected into the site of the transection to fill the cavity. All Sham-operated (Sham) rats underwent a similar operation to those in the SCI group, except that the lower thoracic cord was exposed but not transected. SCI rats received daily assistance in bladder emptying until spontaneous miction recovered.

RES treatment

RES was first dissolved in rapeseed oil and then gently emulsified in a liquid meal (Resource Protein; Nestle, Noisiel, France) in warm water (40°C) for 3 h. Daily RES supplementation lasted 10 days in the treated groups. At 30 min before administration, the mixture was warmed and mixed. Rats were fed RES in a dose equivalent to 400 mg·kg−1·day−1 through a 16 G stainless steel curved feeding needle.

Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and calcium (Ca2+)

Serum 25(OH)D level was measured using a radioimmune assay (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China). Serum concentration of Ca2+ was measured using an autoanalyser (Hitachi 7170; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Measurement of osteocalcin (OCN)

Serum OCN (a specific product of the osteoblast) is a bone formation marker. The concentration of serum osteocalcin was measured using a radioimmunoassay kit (China Institute of Atomic Energy).

Measurement of IL-6

Immediately after decapitation, 2 mL of blood was collected and serum sample was obtained by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 15 min. Serum IL-6 levels were evaluated using elisa kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Measurement of deoxypyridinoline (DPD)

Urinary DPD (the breakdown product of collagen during bone resorption) is a bone resorption marker. DPD excretion was measured using an OSTEOLINKS-DPD EIA kit (Sumitomo Seiyaku, Osaka, Japan), and the data were corrected for the urinary creatinine concentration. Creatinine was quantified with QuantiChrom Creatinine Assay Kits (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA).

Assay of malondialdehyde (MDA) levels

The frozen distal femurs were put in a mortar and pestle that contained liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder immersed in liquid nitrogen. The frozen powder was transferred into a tube containing 1 × RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride and protease inhibitor cocktail.

Bone homogenates and plasma were used for the determination of MDA (a presumptive marker of oxidant-mediated lipid peroxidation) using a kit (Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). MDA content of bone homogenates was calculated as μmol·g−1 of protein.

Measurement of serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC)

Serum TAC was measured with an Antioxidant Assay Kit (Cayman). The final results were expressed as μmol trolox equivalents·mL−1.

Assay of total sulfhydryl (t-SH) levels

Bone homogenates was used for the determination of t-SH using a Glutathione Assay Kit (Cayman). t-SH content of bone homogenates was calculated as μmol·g−1 of protein. The protein concentration was determined with BSA as a standard by a Bradford assay.

Bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD measurement

BMD and BMC were measured ex vivo with a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry NORLAND XR-46 (Norland Co., Fort Atkinson, WI, USA) using the small-animal programme set to a high-resolution mode. Samples were placed on an acrylic platform of uniform 38.1 mm thickness. The BMC of the whole tibiae was obtained. The BMD of proximal tibiae was obtained. The coefficient of variation was 3.0% for BMC and 1% for BMD.

Micro-CT

Trabecular bone morphometry within the metaphyseal region of proximal tibiae was quantified using micro-CT (μCT40, Scanco Medical AG, Zurich, Switzerland, 10.5 μm voxel size, 55 kVp, 145 μA) with a threshold value of 240. The proximal tibial metaphysis was scanned in 250 slices (thickness, 13 μm) in the dorsoventral direction. Three-dimensional reconstruction of bone was performed using the triangulation algorithm. Trabecular morphometry was characterized by measuring the bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume, BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and trabecular number (Tb.N.).

Bone histomorphometry

The proximal tibiae were incubated with the Villanueva bone stain for 7 days, dehydrated in graded ethanols and xylene, and embedded undecalcified in methyl methacrylate. Frontal sections (4 μm thick) were cut with vertical bed microtomes (Leica, Rockleigh, NJ, USA) and affixed to slides precoated with a 1% gelatin solution. Then they were stained according to the Von Kossa method with a tetrachrome counterstain (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Histomorphometric data were collected with the Bioquant Bone Morphometry System (R&M Biometrics Corp., Nashville, TN, USA). Eroded surface, osteoclast surface and osteoblast surface were obtained.

Mineral apposition rate (MAR) and bone formation rate (BFR) were analysed by the calcein double-labelling method. Accordingly, mice were intraperitoneally injected twice with 20 mg·kg−1 calcein 7 and 2 days, respectively, before killing. The tibiae were kept in 90% ethanol and embedded. Longitudinal sections were made. Dynamic histomorphometric measurements were made using a computer and digitizer tablet (Osteomeasure; Osteometrics Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA) interfaced to a Leitz microscope (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany) with a drawing tablet. All measurements were done to the metaphyseal region distal to the growth plate region. To estimate bone formation rate, double-labelled and single-labelled areas were traced and calculated as described (Jilka et al., 1996; Weinstein et al., 1997). Terminology used is that recommended by the Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee of the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (Parfitt et al., 1987).

Measurement of mechanical properties

Using a mechanical strength analyser (TK-252CC; Muromachi Kikai Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), the mechanical strength of left femur was measured as the method described previously (Mosekilde et al., 1993; Katsumata et al., 1995).

For the three-point bending test, the left femur was placed on a special holding device with supports located 12 mm apart. A bending force was applied with the cross head at a speed of 20 mm·min−1, until a fracture occurred. From the load–displacement curve, the ultimate compressive load (N), the stiffness (N·mm−1) and the energy (mJ) were obtained.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis (qRT-PCR)

The frozen distal femurs and tibiae were put in a RNase-free mortar and pestle that contained liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder immersed in liquid nitrogen. The frozen powder was transferred into a tube containing Trizol (Life Technologies Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and total RNA was isolated, according to the manufacturer's protocol. One microgram of total RNA was treated with DNase I (Invitrogen, Camarillo, CA, USA) in a total volume of 10 and 5 μL (500 ng) of this batch was reverse transcribed with 200 U SuperScript II (Invitrogen) using 500 ng oligo-dT and 250 ng random hexamers. RT-PCR analysis was performed with a QuantiTectTM SYBR® Green PCR (Tiangen, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RT-PCR data were based on SYBR green amplification. The sequences of primers are listed in Table 1. The highly specific measurement of mRNA was carried out for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteocalcin (OCN), IL-6, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), adipose-specific fatty-acid-binding protein (aP2), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), Sost, Wnt1, Wnt5a, low-density lipoprotein-related protein 5 (Lrp5), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), receptor for insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1R), insulin-like growth-factor-binding-protein 5 (IGFBP5), Axin2, ctnnb1 and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) using the LightCycler system (Bio-Rad, Carlsbad, CA, USA). PCR amplification was performed in 96-well optical reaction plates for 40 cycles, with each cycle at 94°C for 30 s, 58–63°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s. Each sample was run and analysed in duplicate. Target mRNA levels were adjusted as the values relative to GAPDH, which was used as the endogenous control to ensure equal starting amounts of cDNA. The fold-change relative to values of sham-operated group were obtained and used to express the experimental change in gene expression.

Table 1.

Sequences of oligonucleotides used as primers

Target gene Sequence (5′-3′)
TRAP Sense AATTGCCTACTCCAAGATCTCCAA
Antisense GCGGAACTTTGAAACGCAAA
RANKL Sense CCATCGGGTTCCCATAAAGTC
Antisense CCTGAAGCAAATGTTGGCGTA
OPG Sense GCTCCTGGCACCTACCTAAA
Antisense GTAGCGCCCTTCCTCACATT
IL-6 Sense TCCTACCCCAACTTCCAATGCTC
Antisense TTGGATGGTCTTGGTCCTTAGCC
OCN Sense TCTCTGCTCACTCTGCTGG
Antisense GTGGTGCCATAGATGCGCT
PPARγ Sense CTTTACCACGGTTGATTTCTCCA
Antisense GCAGGCTCTACTTTGATCGCACT
aP2 Sense AGGAAAGTGGCCGGTATGGC
Antisense CCACGCCCAGTTTGAAGGAA
LPL Sense TGGCAGGAAGTCTGACCAACAAG
Antisense AATCCGCATCATCAGGAGAAAGG
Sost Sense GGCAAGCCTTCAAGAATGATGCCA
Antisense TGTACTCGGACACGTCTTTGGTGT
Wnt1 Sense GGGTTTCTGCTACGTTGCTACT
Antisense GGAGGTGATTGCGAAGATAAAC
Wnt5a Sense TCATGAACTTGCACAACAATGA
Antisense CCGTCTTAAACTGGTCATAGCC
Axin2 Sense GAGCCTGTCAACCCCTACTATG
Antisense TCCAACTTTTCTTCAGCCTCTC
Ctnnb1 Sense AACGGCTTTCGGTTGAGCTG
Antisense TGGCGATATCCAAGGGCTTC
Lrp5 Sense CTGCTGGGGGACTTCATCTACTGGAC
Antisense GGGAGGAGTGGAACACCAGGATGTC
IGF-1 Sense GTGGACCGAGGGGCTTTTACTTC
Antisense TTTGCAGCTTCGTTTTCTTGTTTG
IGF-1R Sense CTGCGGCGATGAAGAGAAGAAAA
Antisense TACCGGTGCCACGTTATGATGATT
IGFBP5 Sense ACATGGAAGCTTCCCTCCAGG
Antisense CGTCACTCAACGTTACTGCTG
GAPDH Sense TATCACTCTACCCACGGCAAG
Antisense ATACTCAGCACCAGCATCACC

Study design

SD rats were divided into four groups (n = 41–44 in each group) and treated for 10 days as follows: (i) sham-operated rats (sham); (ii) sham-operated rats received RES (sham + RES); (iii) SCI rats (SCI); and (iv) SCI rats received RES (SCI + RES). 10 days later, femurs and tibiae were removed and the plasma and urine were collected for measurements described as earlier.

Statistical analysis

All the data are presented as mean ± SD. Comparison among groups was analysed using a two-way anova followed by Bonferroni's t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 11.0.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Effects of treatment with RES on general data in SCI rats

The body mass of SCI rats was lower than that in sham-operated rats. Serum Ca2+, 25(OH)D and osteocalcin of SCI rats were lower than those in sham-operated rats. Urinary DPD was higher than that in sham-operated rats.

Treatment of SCI rats with RES reduced urinary DPD and increased serum osteocalcin significantly, increased body mass, but not significantly. Treatment of SCI rats with RES had no significant effect on serum Ca2+ and 25(OH)D (Table 2).

Table 2.

Effects of treatment with RES on general data in SCI rats

Sham Sham + RES SCI SCI + RES
Body mass (g) 235 ± 22 239 ± 27 209 ± 24a 218 ± 21
Serum Ca2+ (mmol·L−1) 2.36 ± 0.17 2.39 ± 0.26 1.87 ± 0.22a 1.92 ± 0.23a
Serum 25(OH)D (nmol·L−1) 142 ± 18 149 ± 20 102 ± 13a 105 ± 15a
Serum osteocalcin (ng·mL−1) 0.125 ± 0.028 0.136 ± 0.021 0.087 ± 0.019 0.132 ± 0.036b
DPD (nM·nM creatinine−1) 19.6 ± 3.8 17.8 ± 3.2 53.4 ± 8.2a 28.8 ± 5.4b

Values are represented as mean ± SD.

Sham, sham-operated.

n = 10–12 in each group.

a

P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group.

b

P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

Treatment of sham-operated rats with RES had no significant effect on these parameters.

Effects of treatment with RES on bone geometric and microstructural parameters of SCI rats

As shown in Table 3, SCI in rats resulted in a significant reduction in tibial BMC, BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, MAR, BFR/bone surface (BS), and Ob.S/BS and femoral ultimate load, stiffness, and energy, and led to an enhancement in tibial Tb.Sp, ES/BS and Oc.S/BS.

Table 3.

Effects of treatment with RES on bone geometric and microstructural parameters of SCI rats

Sham Sham + RES SCI SCI + RES
Tibia
 BMC (g) 0.552 ± 0.058 0.591 ± 0.062 0.428 ± 0.051a 0.535 ± 0.057b
 BMD (g·cm−2) 0.195 ± 0.022 0.204 ± 0.029 0.151 ± 0.018a 0.182 ± 0.025b
 BV/TV (%) 16.3 ± 3.1 17.0 ± 3.6 7.9 ± 2.2a 12.5 ± 2.8b
 Tb.Th (μm) 80.3 ± 11.5 82.1 ± 12.7 56.2 ± 8.8a 72.2 ± 10.2b
 Tb.Sp (μm) 562.7 ± 80.3 574.2 ± 86.2 962.1 ± 102.5a 660.5 ± 90.4b
 Tb.N (n·mm−1) 4.2 ± 1.4 4.3 ± 0.9 2.3 ± 0.7a 3.5 ± 0.8b
 MAR (μm·day−1) 1.71 ± 0.19 1.79 ± 0.17 1.28 ± 0.20a 1.66 ± 0.26b
 BFR/BS (μm3·μm−2·day−1) 0.57 ± 0.07 0.60 ± 0.06 0.40 ± 0.08a 0.54 ± 0.09b
 ES/BS (%) 6.29 ± 0.65 6.01 ± 0.53 12.88 ± 1.32a 8.55 ± 0.90b
 Ob.S/BS (%) 3.56 ± 0.34 3.69 ± 0.37 1.88 ± 0.21a 3.20 ± 0.37b
 Oc.S/BS (%) 2.82 ± 0.45 2.75 ± 0.41 7.06 ± 0.94a 4.24 ± 0.66b
Femur
 Ultimate load (N) 209 ± 47 214 ± 42 141 ± 30a 182 ± 39b
 Stiffness (N·mm−1) 480 ± 96 491 ± 81 358 ± 74a 457 ± 85b
 Energy (mJ) 78 ± 16 80 ± 14 50 ± 13a 67 ± 15b

Values are represented as mean ± SD.

Sham, sham-operated.

n = 10–12 in each group.

a

P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group.

b

P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

Treatment of SCI rats with RES significantly increased tibial BMC, BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, MAR, BFR/BS, and Ob.S/BS and femoral ultimate load, stiffness, and energy, and decreased tibial Tb.Sp, ES/BS, and Oc.S/BS.

Treatment of sham-operated rats with RES had no significant effect on these parameters.

Effect of treatment with RES on the biomarkers of osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in femurs of SCI rats

Compared with sham-operated rats, mRNA levels of TRAP (Figure 1A) and ratio of RANKL-to-OPG (Figure 1B) were higher in femurs of SCI rats; and mRNA levels of osteocalcin (Figure 1C) was lower in femurs of SCI rats. Treatment of SCI rats with RES decreased TRAP mRNA levels, reduced ratio of RANKL-to-OPG, and increased osteocalcin mRNA levels in femurs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of treatment with RES on the biomarkers of osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in femurs of SCI rats. Sham-operated rats and SCI rats were treated with RES for 10 days. Femurs were removed for determination of mRNA levels of TRAP, RANKL, OPG and OCN by qRT-PCR method. The ratio RANKL to OPG was obtained (B). The mRNA levels of TRAP (A) and osteocalcin (C) were adjusted as the values relative to GAPDH. The fold-change relative to values of sham-operated group were obtained and used to express the experimental change in gene expression. n = 10–12 in each group; Values are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group; #P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

Effect of treatment with RES on oxidative stress and inflammation in femurs of SCI rats

When compared with sham-operated rats, serum total capacity of antioxidant (TCA) (Figure 2A) was lower, plasma and femoral MDA content (Figure 2B, C) were higher, and femoral t-SH content (Figure 2D) was lower in SCI rats. Treatment of SCI rats with RES-enhanced serum TCA and femoral t-SH, and reduced plasma and femoral MDA content, which indicated that treatment of SCI rats with RES abated oxidative stress in femurs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of treatment with RES on oxidative stress and inflammation in femurs of SCI rats. Sham-operated rats and SCI rats were treated with RES for 10 days. Serum TCA (A), plasma and femoral MDA (B, C), femoral t-SH (D), and serum and femoral IL-6 (D, E) were measured. n = 10–12 in each group; Values are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group; #P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

SCI in rats enhanced serum IL-6 levels (Figure 2E) and femoral IL-6 mRNA levels (Figure 2F). Treatment of SCI rats with RES reduced serum IL-6 levels and femoral IL-6 mRNA levels, indicating that treatment of SCI rats with RES suppressed inflammation in femurs.

Effect of treatment with RES on genes expression of PPARγ signalling pathway in femurs of SCI rats

When compared with sham-operated rats, femoral mRNA levels of PPARγ (Figure 3A), aP2 (Figure 3B) and LPL (Figure 3C) were higher in SCI rats. Treatment of SCI rats with RES reduced femoral mRNA levels of PPARγ, aP2 and LPL, which indicated that treatment of SCI rats with RES suppressed PPARγ signalling in femurs.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of treatment with RES on genes expression of PPARγ signalling in femurs of SCI rats. Sham-operated rats and SCI rats were treated with RES for 10 days. PPARγ (A), aP2 (B) and LPL (C) mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR method. n = 10–12 in each group; Values are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group; #P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

Similar results were also found in tibiae (Supporting Information Figure S1A–C).

Effect of treatment with RES on genes expression of Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway in femurs of SCI rats

When compared with sham-operated rats, Sost mRNA level (Figure 4A) was higher, and Wnt1 (Figure 4B), Lrp5 (Figure 4D), Axin2 (Figure 4E) and ctnnb1 (Figure 4F) mRNA levels were lower in femurs of SCI rats. Treatment of SCI rats with RES enhanced femoral mRNA levels of Wnt1, Lrp5, Axin2 and ctnnb1, which indicated that treatment of SCI rats with RES restored Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway in femurs. Treatment of SCI rats with RES had no significant effect on femoral Sost mRNA level. Femoral Wnt5a mRNA (Figure 4C) level was similar among four groups.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of treatment with RES on genes expression of Wnt/β-catenin signalling in femurs of SCI rats. Sham-operated rats and SCI rats were treated with RES for 10 days. Sost (A), Wnt1 (B), Wnt5a (C), Lrp5 (D), Axin2 (E) and ctnnb1 (F) mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR method. SCI, spinal cord injury; Lrp5, low-density lipoprotein-related protein5; n = 10–12 in each group. Values are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group; #P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

Similar results were also found in tibiae (Supporting Information Figure S1D–I).

Effect of treatment with RES on genes expression of IGF-1 signalling pathway in femurs of SCI rats

When compared with sham-operated rats, femoral mRNA levels of IGF-1 (Figure 5A), IGF-1R (Figure 5B), and IGFBP5 (Figure 5C) were lower in SCI rats. Treatment of SCI rats with RES-enhanced femoral mRNA levels of IGF-1 and IGF-1R, which indicated that treatment with RES restored IGF-1 signalling in femurs of SCI rats. Treatment of SCI rats with RES had no significant effect on femoral IGFBP5 mRNA level.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effect of treatment with RES on genes expression of IGF-1 signalling in femurs of SCI rats. Sham-operated rats and SCI rats were treated with RES for 10 days. IGF-1 (A), IGF-1R (B) and IGFBP5 (C) mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR method. SCI, spinal cord injury; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IGF-1R, receptor for insulin-like growth factor; IGFBP5, insulin-like growth-factor-binding-protein 5; n = 10–12 in each group. Values are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group; #P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

Similar results were also found in tibiae (Figure S1J–L).

Discussion

In this study, we presented a novel application of RES in attenuating bone loss induced by SCI in rats for the first time. More specifically, RES treatment was associated with a significant reduction in bone resorption and a significant enhancement of bone formation. Increased osteoclast formation and bone resorption after SCI has been demonstrated in rodents and humans (Pietschmann et al., 1992; Morse et al., 2008; 2011). Findings with respect to SCI-mediated effects on osteoblasts are less consistent. Jiang et al. (2007) and Liu et al. (2008) found that bone formation rate in the secondary spongiosae of tibial metaphysis was higher than that in sham-operated groups 3 or 4 weeks after SCI. Morse et al. found that bone formation rate at the distal femoral metaphysis was lower than that in sham-operated groups at 10 days after SCI (Morse et al., 2008) and osteoblast number at the distal femur reduced to 34% at 5 days after injury (Morse et al., 2011). In this study, at 10 days after SCI osteoblast, number and bone formation rate were reduced. These results indicated that osteoblastic function might be impaired at the early stage of SCI, and restored and even enhanced at the late stage of SCI.

Vitamin D deficiency was an important risk factor contributing to declining bone mass and increased fracture risk post-SCI (Hummel et al., 2012). Treatment with RES had no effect on serum 25(OH)D level, which indicated that the beneficial effect of RES on osteoporosis was Vitamin d-independent.

Oxidative stress was considered as a hallmark of injury of SCI (Jia et al., 2012). In this study, SCI in rats led to an enhancement of serum MDA and femoral MDA, indicating that oxidative stress might be involved in the development of osteoporosis after SCI. In addition, a report from Sun et al. revealed that oxidative stress might play an important role in the osteoporosis induced by hindlimb suspension-a model of disuse (Sun et al., 2013). In this work, treatment with RES abated oxidative stress in femurs, indicating that the antioxidant effect of RES might contribute to its anti-osteoporotic effect.

Apart from oxidative stress, inflammation might be another factor involved in the development of bone loss after SCI. Demulder et al. reported that levels of IL-6 was increased in samples from the SCI patients (Demulder et al., 1998), which might promote osteoclast recruitment from marrow precursors and enhance osteoclast activity in sublesional bones. A recent report revealed that RES treatment exerted neuroprotective effect in SCI rats through suppressing inflammation (Liu et al., 2011). In this work, RES treatment reduced serum and femoral IL-6 levels in SCI rats, indicating that anti-osteoporotic effect of RES might be contributed to its suppression on inflammation in sublesional bones of SCI rats.

Our work revealed up-regulated PPARγ signalling in the femurs from SCI rats, which was consistent with a recent report (Yan et al., 2012). PPARγ in osteoblasts suppressed the mature osteoblast phenotype and induced genes associated with an adipocyte-like phenotype, such as aP2, fatty acid synthase and LPL (Lecka-Czernik et al., 1999). In addition, targeted PPARγ deletion could impair osteoclastic differentiation and bone resorption, resulting in osteoporosis (Wan et al., 2007). In this study, RES treatment suppressed PPARγ signalling in the femurs from SCI rats.

Our work revealed reduced Wnt/β-catenin signalling in the femurs from SCI rats, which was consistent with recent reports (Jiang et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2012). Wnt/β-catenin promoted bone formation and suppressed bone resorption in postnatal growing mice (Chen and Long, 2013). The reduced Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway in the femurs from SCI rats might result from up-regulated expression of Sost. Sclerostin, the protein product of the Sost gene, is a potent inhibitor of bone formation. Sclerostin mediated bone response to mechanical unloading through antagonizing Wnt/beta-catenin signalling (Robling et al., 2008; Tu et al., 2012). In this study, RES treatment had no effect on Sost mRNA levels, but restored Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. It was reported that increased lipid oxidation in osteoblast caused oxidative stress, which in turn increased PPARγ expression, and diminished Wnt signalling in the skeleton (Almeida et al., 2009). Therefore, the effect of RES on PPARγ and Wnt/β-catenin signalling might be secondary to its antioxidant effect.

Our work revealed reduced IGF-1 signalling in the femurs from SCI rats. It was reported that the average plasma IGF-1 level was significantly lower in SCI patients and patients with tetraplegia (Shetty et al., 1993; Bauman et al., 1994). Jiang et al. also found depressed IGF-1 signalling in the tibiae from SCI rats (Jiang et al., 2011). IGF-I has been shown to be a potent neurotrophic factor that promotes the growth of projection neurons, dendritic arborization and synaptogenesis, and has been demonstrated neuroprotective effect for SCI rats (Hung et al., 2007). IGF-1 is the most abundant growth factor deposited in the bone matrix and has been implicated in the coupling process through its actions on MSC differentiation (Hayden et al., 1995). IGF-1 released from bone matrix stimulated osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs by activation of mammalian target of rapamycin during bone remodelling (Xian et al., 2012). Suzue et al. (2006) demonstrated that suppressed IGF-I signalling might contribute to decreased bone formation during denervation, and denervation of the sublesional bones also occurred after complete SCI. Therefore, suppressed IGF-I signalling might contribute to decreased bone formation after SCI in rats. In this RES treatment restored the IGF-I signalling in the femurs from SCI rats.

A limitation of our work should be noted. Although unloading is an important factor in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis after SCI, neural lesion also seems to be involved in this process (Jiang et al., 2006). RES significantly promoted the recovery of neuronal function after SCI (Yang and Piao, 2003; Liu et al., 2011). Whether improvement of RES on bone loss was due to direct effect of RES on bone or indirect due to positive effect of RES after SCI or both was elusive, which required further investigation.

In the present study, the dose of RES was high, but was reported to be well tolerated by animals (Lagouge et al., 2006), and recent data failed to show a toxic effect of RES in rats even at doses reaching 700 mg·kg−1·day−1 (Williams et al., 2009). The dose of 400 mg·kg−1 was based on previous studies in which doses ranging from 10 to 400 mg·kg−1 displayed positive effects on adiposity and insulin sensitivity (Szkudelska and Szkudelski, 2010). Very few adverse effects have been documented due to the low bioavailability of RES and no side effects were seen in this study. However, the dose used in our work was not applicable in clinical trials, which might be another limitation of our work. Some additional works about lower dose testing and further clinical trials were required.

In conclusion, treatment with RES attenuated sublesional bone loss in SCI rats, associated with abating oxidative stress, attenuating inflammation, depressing PPARγ signalling, and restoring Wnt/β-catenin and IGF-1 signalling. RES could thus be envisaged as a nutritional countermeasure for osteoporosis after SCI but remains to be tested in humans.

Glossary

25(OH)D

25-hydroxyvitamin D

aP2

adipose-specific fatty-acid-binding protein

BFR/BS

bone formation rate/bone surface

BMD

bone mineral density

BV/TV, t

rabecular bone volume fraction

DPD

deoxypyridinoline

ES/BS

eroded surface/bone surface

IGF-1

insulin-like growth factor 1

IGF-1R

receptor for insulin-like growth factor

IGFBP5

insulin-like growth-factor-binding-protein 5

LPL

lipoprotein lipase

Lrp5

low-density lipoprotein-related protein 5

MAR

mineral apposition rate

MDA

malondialdehyde

Oc.S/BS

osteoclast surface/bone surface

OPG

osteoprotegerin

PPARγ

peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

RANKL

receptor activator of NF-κB ligand

RES

resveratrol

SCI

spinal cord injury

TAC

total antioxidant capacity

Tb.N

trabecular number

Tb.Sp

trabecular separation

Tb.Th

trabecular thickness

TRAP

tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase

t-SH

total sulfhydryl

Conflicts of interest

None to declare.

Supporting information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.12301

Figure S1 Effect of treatment with RES on genes expression of pathways about PPARγ signalling, Wnt/β-catenin signalling, and IGF-1 signalling in tibiae of SCI rats. Sham-operated rats and SCI rats were treated with RES for 10 days. PPARγ (A), aP2 (B), LPL (C), Sost (D), Wnt1 (E), Wnt5a (F), Lrp5 (G), Axin2 (H), ctnnb1 (I), IGF-1 (J), IGF-1R (K) and IGFBP5 (L) mRNA levels were determined by qRT-PCR method. SCI, spinal cord injury; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; aP2, adipose-specific fatty-acid-binding protein; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; Lrp5, low-density lipoprotein-related protein5; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IGF-1R, receptor for insulin-like growth factor; IGFBP5, insulin-like growth-factor-binding-protein 5; n = 10–12 in each group; Values are represented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus the sham-operated group; #P < 0.05 versus the SCI group.

bph0170-0796-SD1.doc (130KB, doc)

References

  1. Alexander SPH, Mathie A, Peters JA. Guide to receptors and channels (GRAC), 5th edition. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(Suppl. 1):S1–S324. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01649_1.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida M, Ambrogini E, Han L, Manolagas SC, Jilka RL. Increased lipid oxidation causes oxidative stress, increased peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma expression, and diminished pro-osteogenic Wnt signaling in the skeleton. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:27438–27448. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.023572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman WA, Spungen AM, Flanagan S, Zhong YG, Alexander LR, Tsitouras PD. Blunted growth hormone response to intravenous arginine in subjects with a spinal cord injury. Horm Metab Res. 1994;26:152–156. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1000798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben M, Harvey L, Denis S, Glinsky J, Goehl G, Chee S, et al. Does 12 weeks of regular standing prevent loss of ankle mobility and bone mineral density in people with recent spinal cord injuries? Aust J Physiother. 2005;51:251–256. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen J, Long F. β-catenin promotes bone formation and suppresses bone resorption in postnatal growing mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:1160–1169. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dauty M, Perrouin VB, Maugars Y, Dubois C, Mathe JF. Supralesional and sublesional bone mineral density in spinal cord-injured patients. Bone. 2000;27:305–309. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00326-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Demulder A, Guns M, Ismail A, Wilmet E, Fondu P, Bergmann P. Increased osteoclast-like cells formation in long-term bone marrow cultures from patients with a spinal cord injury. Calcif Tissue Int. 1998;63:396–400. doi: 10.1007/s002239900547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garland DE, Stewart CA, Adkins RH, Hu SS, Rosen C, Liotta FJ, et al. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. J Orthop Res. 1992;10:371–378. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100100309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giangregorio LM, Hicks AL, Webber CE, Phillips SM, Craven BC, Bugaresti JM, et al. Body weight supported treadmill training in acute spinal cord injury: impact on muscle and bone. Spinal Cord. 2005;43:649–657. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Habold C, Momken I, Ouadi A, Bekaert V, Brasse D. Effect of prior treatment with resveratrol on density and structure of rat long bones under tail-suspension. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011;29:15–22. doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0187-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayden JM, Mohan S, Baylink DJ. The insulin-like growth factor system and the coupling of formation to resorption. Bone. 1995;17:93S–98S. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00186-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. He X, Andersson G, Lindgren U, Li Y. Resveratrol prevents RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation of murine osteoclast progenitor RAW 264.7 cells through inhibition of ROS production. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;401:356–362. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hummel K, Craven BC, Giangregorio L. Serum 25(OH)D, PTH and correlates of suboptimal 25(OH)D levels in persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:812–816. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hung KS, Tsai SH, Lee TC, Lin JW, Chang CK, Chiu WT. Gene transfer of insulin-like growth factor-I providing neuroprotection after spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:35–46. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jia Z, Zhu H, Li J, Wang X, Misra H, Li Y. Oxidative stress in spinal cord injury and antioxidant-based intervention. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:264–274. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jiang SD, Dai LY, Jiang LS. Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;65:555–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Effects of spinal cord injury on osteoblastogenesis, osteoclastogenesis and gene expression profiling in osteoblasts in young rats. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:339–349. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0229-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang SD, Yan J, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Down-regulation of the Wnt, estrogen receptor, insulin-like growth factor-I, and bone morphogenetic protein pathways in osteoblasts from rats with chronic spinal cord injury. Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78:488–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Takahashi K, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC. Linkage of decreased bone mass with impaired osteoblastogenesis in a murine model of accelerated senescence. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1732–1740. doi: 10.1172/JCI118600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Katsumata T, Nakamura T, Ohnishi H, Sakurawa T. Intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment maintains the mass, structure and the mechanical property of bone in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10:921–931. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1577–1579. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kocina P. Body composition of spinal cord injured adults. Sports Med. 1997;23:48–60. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199723010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lagouge M, Argmann C, Gerhart-Hines Z, Meziane H, Lerin C, Daussin F, et al. Resveratrol improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating SIRT1 and PGC-1alpha. Cell. 2006;127:1109–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lecka-Czernik B, Gubrij I, Moerman EJ, Kajkenova O, Lipschitz DA, Manolagas SC, et al. Inhibition of Osf2/Cbfa1 expression and terminal osteoblast differentiation by PPARgamma2. J Cell Biochem. 1999;74:357–371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu C, Shi Z, Fan L, Zhang C, Wang K, Wang B. Resveratrol improves neuron protection and functional recovery in rat model of spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 2011;1374:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu D, Zhao CQ, Li H, Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Effects of spinal cord injury and hindlimb immobilization on sublesional and supralesional bones in young growing rats. Bone. 2008;43:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu ZP, Li WX, Yu B, Huang J, Sun J, Huo JS, et al. Effects of trans-resveratrol from Polygonum cuspidatum on bone loss using the ovariectomized rat model. J Med Food. 2005;8:14–19. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2005.8.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McGrath J, Drummond G, McLachlan E, Kilkenny C, Wainwright C. Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1573–1576. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00873.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Momken I, Stevens L, Bergouignan A, Desplanches D, Rudwill F, Chery I, et al. Resveratrol prevents the wasting disorders of mechanical unloading by acting as a physical exercise mimetic in the rat. FASEB J. 2011;25:3646–3660. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-177295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Morse L, Teng YD, Pham L, Newton K, Yu D, Liao WL, et al. Spinal cord injury causes rapid osteoclastic resorption and growth plate abnormalities in growing rats (SCI-induced bone loss in growing rats) Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:645–652. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0494-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Morse LR, Xu Y, Solomon B, Boyle L, Yoganathan S, Stashenko P, et al. Severe spinal cord injury causes immediate multi-cellular dysfunction at the chondro-osseous junction. Transl Stroke Res. 2011;2:643–650. doi: 10.1007/s12975-011-0118-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mosekilde L, Danielsen CC, Knudsen UB. The effects of aging and ovariectomy on the vertebral bone mass and biomechanical properties of mature rats. Bone. 1993;14:1–6. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90248-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Needham-Shropshire BM, Broton JG, Klose KJ, Lebwohl N, Guest RS, Jacobs PL. Evaluation of a training program for persons with SCI paraplegia using the Parastep 1 ambulation system, part 3: lack of effect on bone mineral density. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:799–803. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90190-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, et al. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. J Bone Miner Res. 1987;2:595–610. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pearson KJ, Baur JA, Lewis KN, Peshkin L, Price NL, Labinskyy N, et al. Resveratrol delays age-related deterioration and mimics transcriptional aspects of dietary restriction without extending life span. Cell Metab. 2008;8:157–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pietschmann P, Pils P, Woloszczuk W, Maerk R, Lessan D, Stipicic J. Increased serum osteocalcin levels in patients with paraplegia. Paraplegia. 1992;30:204–209. doi: 10.1038/sc.1992.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Robling AG, Niziolek PJ, Baldridge LA, Condon KW, Allen MR, Alam I, et al. Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:5866–5875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705092200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shakibaei M, Buhrmann C, Mobasheri A. Resveratrol-mediated SIRT-1 interactions with p300 modulate receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) activation of NF-kappaB signaling and inhibit osteoclastogenesis in bone-derived cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:11492–11505. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.198713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shakibaei M, Shayan P, Busch F, Aldinger C, Buhrmann C, Lueders C, et al. Resveratrol mediated modulation of Sirt-1/Runx2 promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: potential role of Runx2 deacetylation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shetty KR, Sutton CH, Mattson DE, Rudman D. Hyposomatomedinemia in quadriplegic men. Am J Med Sci. 1993;305:95–100. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199302000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sun Y, Shuang F, Chen DM, Zhou RB. Treatment of hydrogen molecule abates oxidative stress and alleviates bone loss induced by modeled microgravity in rats. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:969–978. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Suzue N, Nikawa T, Onishi Y, Yamada C, Hirasaka K, Ogawa T, et al. Ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b downregulates bone formation through suppression of IGF-I signaling in osteoblasts during denervation. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21:722–734. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Szkudelska K, Szkudelski T. Resveratrol, obesity and diabetes. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;635:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.02.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tu X, Rhee Y, Condon KW, Bivi N, Allen MR, Dwyer D, et al. Sost downregulation and local Wnt signaling are required for the osteogenic response to mechanical loading. Bone. 2012;50:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wan Y, Chong LW, Evans RM. PPARgamma regulates osteoclastogenesis in mice. Nat Med. 2007;13:1496–1503. doi: 10.1038/nm1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weinstein RS, Jilka RL, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC. The effects of androgen deficiency on murine bone remodeling and bone mineral density are mediated via cells of the osteoblastic lineage. Endocrinology. 1997;138:4013–4021. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.9.5359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Williams LD, Burdock GA, Edwards JA, Beck M, Bausch J. Safety studies conducted on high-purity trans-resveratrol in experimental animals. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47:2170–2182. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wilmet E, Ismail AA, Heilporn A, Welraeds D, Bergmann P. Longitudinal study of the bone mineral content and of soft tissue composition after spinal cord section. Paraplegia. 1995;33:674–677. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xian L, Wu X, Pang L, Lou M, Rosen CJ, Qiu T, et al. Matrix IGF-1 maintains bone mass by activation of mTOR in mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med. 2012;18:1095–1101. doi: 10.1038/nm.2793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yan J, Li B, Chen JW, Jiang SD, Jiang LS. Spinal cord injury causes bone loss through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and Wnt signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:2968–2977. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2012.01624.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang YB, Piao YJ. Effects of resveratrol on secondary damages after acute spinal cord injury in rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2003;24:703–710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhou H, Shang L, Li X, Zhang X, Gao G, Guo C, et al. Resveratrol augments the canonical Wnt signaling pathway in promoting osteoblastic differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal cells. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:2953–2962. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

bph0170-0796-SD1.doc (130KB, doc)

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES