Skip to main content
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 2013 Oct 1;170(4):919–932. doi: 10.1111/bph.12340

The orthosteric GABAA receptor ligand Thio-4-PIOL displays distinctly different functional properties at synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors

K Hoestgaard-Jensen 1, R M O'Connor 2, N O Dalby 3, C Simonsen 1, B C Finger 2, A Golubeva 2, H Hammer 1, M L Bergmann 1, U Kristiansen 1, P Krogsgaard-Larsen 1, H Bräuner-Osborne 1, B Ebert 3, B Frølund 1, J F Cryan 2, A A Jensen 1
PMCID: PMC3799604  PMID: 23957253

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Explorations into the heterogeneous population of native GABA type A receptors (GABAARs) and the physiological functions governed by the multiple GABAAR subtypes have for decades been hampered by the lack of subtype-selective ligands.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The functional properties of the orthosteric GABAA receptor ligand 5-(4-piperidyl)-3-isothiazolol (Thio-4-PIOL) have been investigated in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo.

KEY RESULTS

Thio-4-PIOL displayed substantial partial agonist activity at the human extrasynaptic GABAAR subtypes expressed in Xenopus oocytes, eliciting maximal responses of up to ∼30% of that of GABA at α5β3γ2S, α4β3δ and α6β3δ and somewhat lower efficacies at the corresponding α5β2γ2S, α4β2δ and α6β2δ subtypes (maximal responses of 4–12%). In contrast, it was an extremely low efficacious agonist at the α1β3γ2S, α1β2γ2S, α2β2γ2S, α2β3γ2S, α3β2γ2S and α3β3γ2S GABAARs (maximal responses of 0–4%). In concordance with its agonism at extrasynaptic GABAARs and its de facto antagonism at the synaptic receptors, Thio-4-PIOL elicited robust tonic currents in electrophysiological recordings on slices from rat CA1 hippocampus and ventrobasal thalamus and antagonized phasic currents in hippocampal neurons. Finally, the observed effects of Thio-4-PIOL in rat tests of anxiety, locomotion, nociception and spatial memory were overall in good agreement with its in vitro and ex vivo properties.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The diverse signalling characteristics of Thio-4-PIOL at GABAARs represent one of the few examples of a functionally subtype-selective orthosteric GABAAR ligand reported to date. We propose that Thio-4-PIOL could be a useful pharmacological tool in future studies exploring the physiological roles of native synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAARs.

Keywords: GABA, GABAA receptors, orthosteric ligand, Thio-4-PIOL, functional selectivity, subtype selectivity, partial agonism, tonic currents, tonic inhibition, phasic currents

Introduction

GABA is the predominant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS. Decades of clinical use of benzodiazepines, barbiturates, neuroactive steroids and general anesthetics have established the GABAA receptors (GABAARs) as drug targets in anxiety, sleeping disorders, pain and epilepsy, and the receptors are still pursued as putative targets in numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders (Orser et al., 2002; Nemeroff, 2003; Taylor et al., 2003; Ebert et al., 2006; Enna and McCarson, 2006; Korpi and Sinkkonen, 2006; Da Settimo et al., 2007).

The GABAARs are membrane-bound pentameric ligand-gated ion channels belonging to the Cys-loop receptor superfamily, and they facilitate the flux of anions across the cell membrane leading to hyperpolarization and inhibition of the cell (Miller and Smart, 2010). The multifaceted contributions of GABAARs to inhibitory neurotransmission arise from the existence of 19 subunits (α16, β13, γ13, δ, ε, π, θ and ρ13), as the numerous receptor subtypes formed from these display distinct regional and cell type-specific expression patterns (McKernan and Whiting, 1996; Pirker et al., 2000; Whiting, 2003; Olsen and Sieghart, 2009). The synaptic GABAARs mediating the phasic GABA signalling are predominantly composed of α1, α2 and/or α3 in combination with β23 and γ2 subunits, α1β2γ2 being the most predominant subtype (McKernan and Whiting, 1996; Whiting, 2003; Olsen and Sieghart, 2009). The extrasynaptic receptors mediating tonic inhibition are predominantly α4β2/3δ or α6β2/3δ complexes, although other extrasynaptic subtypes, such as α5β2/3γ2 GABAARs in hippocampal pyramidal cells, exist (McKernan and Whiting, 1996; Glykys and Mody, 2007; Glykys et al., 2008; Belelli et al., 2009; Olsen and Sieghart, 2009; Marowsky et al., 2012). The therapeutic prospects in extrasynaptic GABAARs are underlined by the in vivo effects of the α4βδ/α6βδ agonist 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP or gaboxadol) (Krogsgaard-Larsen et al., 2004; Ebert et al., 2006) and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of α4βδ/α6βδ receptors (Wafford et al., 2009; Hoestgaard-Jensen et al., 2010), and by the increasing interest in hippocampal α5β2/3γ2 receptors as putative targets in cognitive disorders (Maubach, 2003; Glykys and Mody, 2007; Möhler, 2009; Atack, 2011b).

In the present study, the orthosteric GABAAR ligand 5-(4-piperidyl)-3-isothiazolol (Thio-4-PIOL) has been found to exhibit distinctly different functional properties at some extrasynaptic GABAARs compared with the synaptic receptors, and the effects of Thio-4-PIOL on phasic and tonic currents in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal and thalamic principal neurons and in animal tests of anxiety, locomotion, nociception and spatial memory have been delineated.

Methods

Materials

Culture media, serum, antibiotics and buffers for cell culture were obtained from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK). Thio-4-PIOL and THIP were synthesized in-house, and SR95531 (gabazine) and DS2 were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). Human α1, α5, β2 and γ2S GABAAR subunit cDNAs in pcDNA3.1 were used for the experiments using HEK293 cells, whereas cDNAs encoding α1, α3, β2, β3, γ2S and ™ in pGemHE, α4 in pcDNAI, and α2, α5 and α6 in pcDNA3.1 were used for the oocyte experiments. Drug and molecular target nomenclature conforms to the British Journal of Pharmacology Guide to Receptors and Channels (Alexander et al., 2011).

Xenopus laevis oocytes and two-electrode voltage clamp (TEVC)

All cDNAs were transcribed and capped in vitro (mMessage mMachine T7 kit, Ambion, Foster City, CA, USA), and cRNAs were purified using RNeasy Mini columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Oocyte isolation, injection and TEVC were performed as described previously (Storustovu and Ebert, 2006). 32 nL cRNA encoding α1,2,3,5β2,3γ2S (in a subunit ratio of 0.2; 0.2; 0.2 μg/μL) or 46 nL cRNA encoding α4,6β3δ (in a subunit ratio of 1; 0.1; 1 μg/μL) were injected into the oocytes, which were then incubated for at least 72 h in modified Barth's saline. Oocytes were clamped at −40 to −70 mV by a GeneClamp 500B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA) and both voltage and current electrodes were filled with 3 M KCl. Using TEVC, agonists were applied until the peak of the response was observed, usually after 30 s or less. A 4 min washout period between agonist applications was allowed to minimize desensitization of α1,2,3β2,3γ2S GABAARs, whereas a 7 min washout period was allowed at α5β2,3γ2S, α4β2,3δ and α6β2,3δ GABAARs. The presence of δ in cell surface-expressed α4β2,3δ and α6β2,3δ complexes was verified by using Zn2+ and DS2 (Storustovu and Ebert, 2006; Wafford et al., 2009), and the incorporation of γ2S into cell surface-expressed α1,2,3,5β2,3γ2S GABAARs was confirmed using diazepam. Experiments were performed on at least four oocytes from at least two different batches of oocytes for each subtype. Data were normalized to the maximum current elicited by GABA at the individual oocyte. Concentration-response curves were fitted by use of the non-linear regression, GraFit 5.0.13 (Erithacus Software, Horley, Surrey, UK). The parameters obtained were compared using Student's t-test (two-tailed, two-sample equal variance) and considered significant if P < 0.05.

Patch-clamp recordings

Transient transfections and whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed essentially as previously described (Madsen et al., 2007). HEK293 cells were co-transfected with α1-pcDNA3.1 or α5-pcDNA3.1, β2-pcDNA3.1 and γ2S-pcDNA3.1 (1:1:5 ratio) and GFP-Targefect-293 (Targeting Systems, CA, USA) and recordings were performed 40–100 h after transfection. The presence of γ2S in cell surface-expressed receptors was verified by the ability of 1 μM diazepam to potentiate the GABA response.

Slice electrophysiology

Protocols were approved by the Danish Authorities for Animal Experimentation. Slice electrophysiology was performed as previously described using brains from adult (42–60 days) male Lister hooded rats (Harlan, UK) (Hoestgaard-Jensen et al., 2010). Briefly, a 5 min baseline recording was followed by Thio-4-PIOL application and recording for an additional 5 min, after which SR95531 was added to the bath (final concentration ∼100 μM). Whole-cell capacitance and series resistance (RS) were noted every 3–4 min throughout the recording, and RS were compensated by 70%. Recordings were discarded if the RS or cell capacitance deviated more than 20% from initial values. For assessment of tonic currents, a systematic sampling regimen was used plotting the mean holding current of a 1 ms period every 100 ms against time. The tonic current in hippocampus CA1 and thalamic neurons was measured as the difference in holding current for two 5 s windows at the peak of tonic current and after addition of SR95531 until full effect (10–30 s). In thalamus, the tonic current in the control situation was subtracted. A two-tailed, two-sample equal variance t-test was used for comparing tonic currents. Slices were post-recording processed for visualization of the recorded neuron using a Alexa-Flour® 488 streptavidin conjugate (Hoestgaard-Jensen et al., 2010). Detection and analysis of IPSCs was carried out in Minianalysis (6.03, Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA, USA) (Hoestgaard-Jensen et al., 2010). The miniature IPSC (mIPSC) frequency was assessed in a 2 min window at the end of baseline and drug perfusion period. The event amplitude, 10–90% rise-time and mono-exponential fit for decay-time constants were assessed for the averaged non-contaminated event. Statistical significance for effect was P < 0.05.

Animal studies

Animals

Eighty male Sprague Dawley rats (Harlan, UK) were used in these studies (40 were used in the Morris water maze experiment while a separate cohort of 40 rats was used for all other behavioural experiments). Upon arrival, rats weighed 250–300g. For the Morris water maze experiment animals were group housed 3–5 per cage post-surgery while for all other behavioural experiments animals were single-housed post-surgery. The holding room was temperature (22 ± 1°C) and humidity controlled (55 ± 5%) and under a 12-hour light/dark cycle (lights on 07:00) with food and water available ad libitum. All surgeries and experiments were approved by the Department of Health in Ireland in accordance with EU directive 89/609/EEC and approved by the Animal Experimentation & Ethics Committee of University College Cork. All studies involving animals are reported in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals (Kilkenny et al., 2010; McGrath et al., 2010).

Stereotactic surgery

All surgical procedures were carried out under semi-sterile conditions. Anaesthesia was induced with a ketamine (90 mg·kg−1) and xyalizine (10 mg·kg−1) mixture for the experiments involving the Morris water maze while anaesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane for all other behavioural experiments. For cannula implantation, rats were positioned in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA) with the incisor bars set at −3.3 mm. Two stainless steel screws were inserted into the skull. For i.c.v. cannula implantation, a steel guide cannula (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) was implanted 1 mm above the right lateral ventricle [0.8 mm anterior-posterior (AP), 1.3 mm medial lateral (ML); Paxinos and Watson, 1998] and for bilateral hippocampal implantation, a similar steel guide cannula was implanted 3 mm above both hippocampi (−4.0 mm AP, ±3.6 mm ML). Dental cement was applied for fixation and stabilization of the implants. Following surgery animals received 3 mg·kg−1 carprofen (s.c.) and were monitored for at least 10 days of recovery before experimental testing started.

Drugs

Thio-4-PIOL was dissolved in sterile saline (0.9%) to final concentrations of 1, 2 and 4 nmol·μL−1. Due to the unknown ability of Thio-4-PIOL to cross the blood–brain barrier, all solutions were delivered direct to the brain using cannula implantation. For i.c.v. administration, solutions were delivered in a 5 μL volume resulting in 5, 10 and 20 nmol of Thio-4-PIOL. For studies assessing the effects of Thio-4-PIOL on spatial memory, solutions were delivered bilaterally to the hippocampus. A volume of 1 μL was delivered to either hippocampus leading to concentrations of 1, 2 and 4 nmol (a smaller volume of drug was used due to the smaller diffusion area present in the hippocampus). All substances (Thio-4-PIOL/saline) were injected 10 min prior to testing. Drugs were administered using an infusion system (Plastics One). Correct surgical placement was confirmed at the end of the study by injection of blue dye.

Behavioural testing

Behavioural testing started after 10 days of recovery from surgery. All tests were carried out in all animals, with at least 10 days of experimental break between individual tests. Animals displaying post-surgical problems or severe side effects after drug administration, for example, seizures or respiratory depression, were excluded from the experiment.

Open field

The open field test was carried out as described previously (McKernan et al., 2010; O'Malley et al., 2010). Briefly, animals were placed into the equally lit (1000 lux) testing arena (90 cm diameter) for 40 min and locomotor activity (distance travelled) was analysed using EthoVision software (Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands).

Elevated plus maze (EPM)

The EPM experiments were performed as described previously (Jacobson and Cryan, 2008). The EPM apparatus consisted of two open arms (51 × 10 cm) and two enclosed arms (51 × 10 × 40.5 cm) that radiated from a central platform (10 cm × 10 cm) raised 74.5 cm from the ground. Rats were placed into the neutral zone facing towards the closed arm and were allowed to freely explore the maze for five minutes. An entry was scored when the animal was inside an arm with all four paws.

Hot plate test

For assessment of pain threshold and sedative state, animals were exposed to a 55°C hot steel plate and latencies to retract of lick paws were measured (Allen and Yaksh, 2004; Gosselin et al., 2010). Animals received one baseline session, were injected 35 min later and retested 10 min post-injection. The difference from baseline in individual latencies was recorded.

Morris water maze

The protocol was based on previously published studies (Zellner et al., 1991; Vorhees et al., 2000; Collinson et al., 2006; Vorhees and Williams, 2006) with minor modifications. The apparatus consisted of a circular tank of 180 cm diameter filled with water to a depth of 31 cm. An opaque platform with a diameter of 10 cm was placed in the middle of one of the quadrants so that it was slightly submerged below the water level and not visible from the surface. Distal cues were arranged around the maze to provide landmarks by which the animals could to use to navigate to the platform. Animals received 4 days of training that consisted of four trials per day. At the beginning of each trial, the animal was placed in one of the four distal start positions facing the wall of the tank and allowed to explore the maze for 180 s. A different starting position was used for each of the four trials on a given day arranged in a semi-random pattern. If the platform was not located within this time, the animal was gently assisted to the platform by the experimenter. On the fifth day of the procedure, the platform was removed and the animals were placed in a novel starting position and allowed to freely explore the pool for 60 s. The amount of time spent in the quadrant originally hosting the platform was recorded via EthoVision.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc comparison (least significant difference). For analysis of locomotor activity over 40 min in the open field and for analysis of performance during training sessions in the Morris water maze, a one-way repeated measures ANOVA was carried out in addition. All tests were carried out at a significance level of P < 0.05. All analysis was carried out using SPSS 15.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Functional characterization of Thio-4-PIOL at recombinant GABAARs in Xenopus oocytes

In a search for GABAAR ligands with interesting functional properties, a number of previously published bioisosteric analogues of GABA were characterized functionally at six human GABAAR subtypes expressed in tsA201 cells in the fluorescence-based FLIPR® Membrane Potential Blue assay (Jensen et al., 2010). In this screening, the compound Thio-4-PIOL (Figure 1) was found to possess an interesting subtype-selectivity profile (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structure of Thio-4-PIOL.

To study the pharmacological properties of Thio-4-PIOL in a more sophisticated functional assay, the compound was characterized functionally at 12 human GABAAR subtypes expressed in Xenopus oocytes by use of the TEVC technique. Here, Thio-4-PIOL was found to be a partial agonist at the extrasynaptic α5β3γ2S, α4β3δ and α6β3δ GABAAR subtypes displaying EC50 values in the high nanomolar-low micromolar ranges and maximal responses of about 30% of that of GABA at the respective receptors (Figure 2 and Table 1). Thio-4-PIOL was also found to be a partial agonist at the β2-containing extrasynaptic GABAAR subtypes α5β2γ2S, α4β2δ and α6β2δ. However, the maximal responses exhibited by the compound at these receptors were somewhat lower than those at the corresponding β3-containing subtypes, ranging from 4 to 12% of that of GABA at the respective receptors (Figure 2 and Table 1). The observed difference in efficacies obtained for Thio-4-PIOL at α4β2δ and α4β3δ did not seem to arise from a general trend of agonists exhibiting higher efficacies β3-containing receptors than at β2-containing receptors in the Xenopus oocyte expression system, since the reference α4βδ super agonist THIP displayed similar maximal responses (in % of the respective Rmax values of GABA) at the two receptors (Supporting Information Fig. S1). In fact, the functional properties exhibited by THIP at the two receptors were in excellent agreement with those reported for the compound at the α4β3δ GABAAR in a previous study (Storustovu and Ebert, 2006).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Functional properties of Thio-4-PIOL at extrasynaptic GABAARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. (A) Representative traces of the responses elicited GABA (left) and Thio-4-PIOL (right) in oocytes expressing the α4β3δ GABAAR. (B) Concentration-response curves for GABA (Inline graphic) and Thio-4-PIOL (▪) at human α5β2γ2S, α5β3γ2S, α6β2δ, α6β3δ, α4β2δ and α4β3δ GABAARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. For α5β3γ2S and α6β3δ, the curves are based on recordings on ‘Thio-4-PIOL high efficacy’ oocytes (see Table 1 for data for ‘Thio-4-PIOL low efficacy’ α5β3γ2S- and α6β3δ-expressing oocytes). Each data point represents the mean ± SEM values for 4–10 oocytes.

Table 1.

Functional properties of GABA and Thio-4-PIOL at 12 human GABAAR subtypes expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The EC50 (in μM), pEC50 ± SEM, nH ± SEM, Rmax ± SEM (in % of the maximum response of GABA) and number of experiments performed (n) for Thio-4-PIOL and GABA are given

EC50 (μM) pEC50 nH Rmax (%) n
α1β2γ2S
 GABA 37 4.43 ± 0.03 1.21 ± 0.07 100 6
 Thio-4-PIOL ND ND ND ND 4
α1β3γ2S
 GABA 11 4.97 ± 0.13 0.97 ± 0.07 100 10
 Thio-4-PIOL 23 4.63 ± 0.04 1.43 ± 0.11 4.4 ± 1.7 6
α2β2γ2S
 GABA 51 4.29 ± 0.05 1.35 ± 0.05 100 4
 Thio-4-PIOL 85 4.07 ± 0.67 1.49 ± 0.19 1.0 ± 0.5 4
α2β3γ2S
 GABA 110 3.94 ± 0.20 0.77 ± 0.09 100 5
 Thio-4-PIOL 33 4.49 ± 0.24 1.42 ± 0.27 4.2 ± 0.6 4
α3β2γ2S
 GABA 72 4.14 ± 0.05 1.19 ± 0.07 100 4
 Thio-4-PIOL 320 3.50 ± 0.43 1.13 ± 0.51 1.2 ± 0.6 5
α3β3γ2S
 GABA 330 3.48 ± 0.38 0.86 ± 0.19 100 6
 Thio-4-PIOL 17 4.78 ± 0.27 1.66 ± 0.73 1.2 ± 0.7 4
α5β2γ2S
 GABA 35 4.46 ± 0.08 1.05 ± 0.09 100 6
 Thio-4-PIOL 91 4.04 ± 0.40 3.32 ± 2.21 3.9 ± 1.4 4
α5β3γ2S
 GABA 11 4.94 ± 0.14 1.13 ± 0.08 100 5
 Thio-4-PIOL 24 4.61 ± 0.22 1.33 ± 0.12 34 ± 9a 7
3.9 ± 0.8a 6
α4β2δ
 GABA 2.6 5.59 ± 0.19 1.15 ± 0.07 100 4
 Thio-4-PIOL 16 4.79 ± 0.31 0.89 ± 0.13 6.7 ± 0.6 4
α4β3δ
 GABA 2.7 5.57 ± 0.09 0.75 ± 0.08 100 10
 Thio-4-PIOL 2.9 5.54 ± 0.18 1.19 ± 0.29 28 ± 2 6
α6β2δ
 GABA 0.69 6.16 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.10 100 4
 Thio-4-PIOL 21 4.68 ± 0.04 1.48 ± 0.67 12 ± 2 5
α6β3δ
 GABA 0.14 6.85 ± 0.21 1.03 ± 0.05 100 4
 Thio-4-PIOLa 2.1 5.67 ± 0.15 0.88 ± 0.11 32 ± 3a 7
9.2 ± 1.6a 11

Due to the minute response evoked by Thio-4-PIOL through this receptor, pEC50, nH and Rmax values could not be determined.

a

As outlined in Results, two different α5β3γ2S and α6β3δ populations seemed to be formed in oocytes from different batches in terms of the maximal responses elicited by Thio-4-PIOL.

ND, not determinable.

It should be mentioned that while the maximal responses exhibited by Thio-4-PIOL in α4β3δ-, α4β2δ-, α6β2δ- and α5β2γ2S-expressing oocytes were consistent in size in all recordings, the same cannot be claimed to be the case for α5β3γ2S and α6β3δ (Table 1). The efficacies exhibited by Thio-4-PIOL at receptors assembled in oocytes injected with cRNAs encoding for these two subtypes differed substantially between oocyte batches, whereas the efficacies displayed by the compound at receptors in different oocytes from the same batch were very similar. Thus, two distinct receptor populations with high and low Thio-4-PIOL efficacy seemed to be formed in oocytes expressing α5β3γ2S (34 ± 9% and 3.9 ± 0.8%) and α6β3δ (32 ± 3% and 9.2 ± 1.6%). The presence of the γ2S subunit in both ‘high efficacy’ and ‘low efficacy’ α5β3γ2S receptors was verified using diazepam, and analogously, the potentiation of GABA-evoked currents in oocytes expressing either of the two α6β3δ populations by DS2 confirmed the incorporation of the δ subunit at least some of these receptors (data not shown). Elaborate investigations using different cRNA preparations, different subunit injection ratios, different Thio-4-PIOL batches and oocytes from other sources did not elucidate the reasons for these different efficacies of Thio-4-PIOL at α5β3γ2S and α6β3δ in different oocyte batches further. Thus, except for the generally fickle nature of extrasynaptic GABAARs in the Xenopus oocyte expression system, we cannot provide an explanation for this observation.

In contrast to its pronounced agonism at extrasynaptic GABAARs, in particular the β3-containing subtypes, Thio-4-PIOL displayed negligible agonist activity at the α1β2γ2S, α1β3γ2S, α2β2γ2S, α2β3γ2S, α3β2γ2S and α3β3γ2S subtypes at concentrations up to 1 mM, eliciting maximal responses of 0–4% of those of GABA at the respective receptors (Figure 3 and Table 1). Thus, Thio-4-PIOL must be considered a de facto antagonist at these receptors.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Functional properties of Thio-4-PIOL at synaptic GABAARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. (A) Representative traces of the responses elicited GABA (left) and Thio-4-PIOL (right) in oocytes expressing the α1β3γ2s GABAAR. (B) Concentration-response curves for GABA (Inline graphic) and Thio-4-PIOL (▪) at human α1β2γ2S, α1β3γ2S, α2β2γ2S, α2β3γ2S, α3β2γ2S and α3β3γ2S GABAARs expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Each data point represents the mean ± SEM values for 4–10 oocytes.

In a recent study, the GABA metabolite γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) has been shown to be an agonist at the extrasynaptic α4βδ GABAAR, and GHB has been proposed to act through a binding site distinct from but overlapping with the orthosteric site in the receptor (Absalom et al., 2012). A substantial amount of evidence suggests that Thio-4-PIOL targets the orthosteric site in the GABAAR complex and not this GHB site. Being a small unsubstituted GABA analogue, Thio-4-PIOL comprises all pharmacophore elements required for binding to the orthosteric site in the receptor, whereas the hydroxy group present in GHB and all other high-affinity GHB site ligands published to date is substituted by an amino group in Thio-4-PIOL. Furthermore, whereas Thio-4-PIOL displaces binding of the orthosteric radioligand [3H]muscimol to native and recombinant GABAARs in a competitive manner (Frølund et al., 1995; Ebert et al., 1997), [3H]NCS-382 binding to rat brain tissue is not displaced by high concentrations of the orthosteric GABAAR agonists muscimol and THIP, which both share high structural similarity to Thio-4-PIOL (Mehta et al., 2001; Absalom et al., 2012). In this study, we investigated whether the agonist activity of Thio-4-PIOL at the α4βδ GABAAR is mediated by via the GHB site by use of NCS-382, a GHB site-specific ligand (Kaupmann et al., 2003). The response elicited by 30 μM Thio-4-PIOL (EC70-EC80) in α4β2δ-expressing oocytes was not decreased (or increased) significantly by pre-incubation and co-application of 100 μM NCS-382 with Thio-4-PIOL (data not shown). This strongly suggests that Thio-4-PIOL targets the orthosteric site in the GABAAR exclusively.

Functional characterization of Thio-4-PIOL at recombinant GABAARs in HEK293 cells

The functional properties of Thio-4-PIOL were also determined at human α1β2γ2S and α5β2γ2S GABAARs transiently expressed in HEK293 cells by patch-clamp recordings (Figure 4). Thio-4-PIOL displayed an EC50 value of 39 μM [95% confidence interval (CI): 19–80 μM], a Hill slope of 2.3 and a maximal response of 28% of that of GABA (95% CI: 21–35%) at α5β2γ2 (n = 6) and an EC50 value of 34 μM (95% CI: 8.1–140 μM), a Hill Slope of 1.4 and a maximal response of 5.6% of that of GABA (95% CI: 3.1–8.1%) at α1β2γ2 (n = 5; Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Concentration-response curves for Thio-4-PIOL at human α1β2γ2s and α5β2γ2s GABAARs transiently expressed in HEK293 cells and assayed by patch-clamp electrophysiology.

The very low efficacy exhibited by Thio-4-PIOL at the α1β2γ2S GABAAR in the patch-clamp recordings is in agreement with previous patch-clamp recordings at the receptor expressed in HEK293 cells as well as with the negligible response evoked by the compound in α1β2γ2S-expressing oocytes (Figure 3; Mortensen et al., 2004). In contrast, the relative efficacy displayed by Thio-4-PIOL compared with GABA at α5β2γ2S in HEK293 cells and in oocytes differed considerably (28 and 3.9% respectively). In the absence of a specific explanation for this difference, we can only ascribe it to the fundamental differences in the two recording set-ups or to the putative presence of a cofactor in one of the two cell types and not in the other. Changes in the elastic properties of the membrane lipid bilayer have been shown to induce significantly different gating characteristics of GABAARs in both oocytes and HEK293 cells (Søgaard et al., 2006; Chisari et al., 2011), and thus, the difference in the cellular membranes in oocytes and HEK293 cells could be speculated to contribute to the difference. Interestingly, the α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, another member of the Cys-loop receptor superfamily, has been proposed to assemble into (α3)24)3 and (α3)34)2 stoichiometries in oocytes and in HEK293 cells respectively (Krashia et al., 2010). However, considering the invariable subunit arrangement of the αβγ2S complex, the two cell types are unlikely to express different α5β2γ2S stoichiometries. The routinely use of diazepam to verify incorporation of γ2S into the assembled receptors does not exclude the possibility that pure α5β2 complexes may have been expressed in the oocytes and HEK293 cells. However, the efficacy difference exhibited by Thio-4-PIOL cannot be ascribed to the putative presence of these receptors, as they most likely constitute small fractions of the total receptor populations in the two cell types.

Functional characterization of Thio-4-PIOL at native GABAARs by slice electrophysiology

The ability of Thio-4-PIOL to induce tonic current was investigated in slices from rat hippocampus and thalamus. The approximate location and morphology of recorded and stained neurons are shown in Figure 5F. In CA1 hippocampal neurons, Thio-4-PIOL induced a concentration-dependent slowly desensitizing tonic current of 0.2 ± 0.2 pA/pF (baseline; n = 6), 0.3 ± 0.1 pA/pF (2.4 μM; n = 6), 5.4 ± 0.3 pA/pF (12 μM; n = 5), 17 ± 5.2 pA/pF (60 μM; n = 6) and 22 ± 3.5 pA/pF (300 μM; n = 5) (Figure 5A and B). The compound also induced a pronounced tonic current in thalamic ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus/ventral posterolateral thalamic nucleus neurons (Figure 5A), which, when normalized to cell size, did not differ significantly from that observed in the hippocampal neurons (4.5 ± 0.3 pA/pF and 21 ± 3.4 pA/pF at 12 and 300 μM Thio-4-PIOL respectively; Figure 5B). A significant tonic current was present in the thalamic neurons in the control situation (Figure 5A). In both regions, the tonic current was completely eliminated by co-application of the competitive GABAAR antagonist SR95531 (Figure 5A). Representative traces of 1 s recordings of mIPSCs recorded in CA1 hippocampal neurons during control and perfusion of Thio-4-PIOL are shown in Figure 5C. The noise induced by 60 and 300 μM Thio-4-PIOL precluded detection of the mIPSCs in these experiments, and thus, event characteristics is only given for the lowest dose. The averaged mIPSC peak in six cells was significantly decreased from 9.4 ± 0.6 pA in the control situation to 7.9 ± 0.1 pA in the presence of 2.4 μM Thio-4-PIOL (paired t-test, P = 0.003) (Figure 5D). In contrast, rise-time was unchanged (RT10–90: 0.77 ± 0.04 in control vs. 0.76 ± 0.04 at 2.4 μM Thio-4-PIOL, paired t-test, P = 0.7), and decay time was also unaffected (7.75 ± 0.30 in control vs. 7.83 ± 0.20 at 2.4 μM Thio-4-PIOL, paired t-test, P = 0.8). The mean inter-event interval of the mIPSCs in control was 0.1 ± 0.04 s, and the cumulative distribution for six cells is shown in Figure 5E. At 2.4 μM Thio-4-PIOL, no significant difference was observed in the mean inter-event interval (paired t-test, P = 0.39, n = 6). At 12 μM Thio-4-PIOL, the mean inter-event interval increased from 1.2 ± 0.4 s in the control period to 7.2 ± 1.2 s (paired t-test, P = 0.003, n = 5). The cumulative distribution for inter-event interval at control and 12 μM Thio-4-PIOL for five cells is shown in Figure 5E.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Functional properties of Thio-4-PIOL at native GABAARs in rat hippocampal and thalamic neurons. (A) Induction of tonic current by 12 μM and 300 μM Thio-4-PIOL in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons and in thalamic ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus/ventral posterolateral thalamic nucleus (VPM/VPL) neurons. (B) Tonic current induced by different Thio-4-PIOL concentrations in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons and in thalamic VPM/VPL neurons. The tonic current is normalized to the cell capacitance (tonic current density, pA/pF). (C) Representative traces of 1 s duration of CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neuron recordings in control and in the presence of 2.4, 12 and 60 μM Thio-4-PIOL. (D) The average non-contaminated waveform of the mIPSC in control and 2.4 μM Thio-4-PIOL. (E) Cumulative distribution of inter-event interval of mIPSCs in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons in the control situation and in the presence of 2.4 and 12 μM Thio-4-PIOL. The detection level for the mIPSC was set relative to baseline root mean square. (F) Coronal diagram of a map of the rat brain, modified from (Paxinos and Watson, 1998). Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made on neurons in coronal brain slices from adult Lister hooded male rats either from CA1 or VPM/VPL in thalamus. Cells were filled with green fluorescent protein, and post-recording, a histological examination was made for each neuron. Pyramidal neuron from CA1 in hippocampus. Scale bar = 100 μm. Neuron from VPM/VPL in thalamus. Scale bar = 20 μm.

Effects of Thio-4-PIOL in rat models for locomotion, anxiety, nociception and spatial memory

Open field

Administration of Thio-4-PIOL influenced locomotor activity differentially over the course of 40 min in the open field test (time × drug F(21,231) = 2.816; P < 0.001), with an overall significant reduction in the distance travelled in rats dosed with 5 nmol (P = 0.037). Reduced locomotion in the other treatment groups was only pronounced in the first individual 5 min time bins, with a strong impact on animals from the 20 nmol group for 10 min (P = 0.001, P = 0.043) and for rats from the 10 nmol group for 5 min (P = 0.015). Interestingly, a trend of increased locomotor activity could be observed in animals from the 20 nmol group towards the end of the test session (Figure 6A).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Behavioural effects of Thio-4-PIOL in animal models of locomotion, anxiety, nociception and spatial memory. All graphs show mean values ± SEM. (A) Distance travelled in individual 5 min bins in the open field model. Vehicle (n = 9), 5 nmol (n = 10), 10 nmol (n = 8), 20 nmol (n = 10). (B) Percentage of open arm entries and time spent on the open arm in the EPM. Vehicle (n = 10), 5 nmol (n = 7), 10 nmol (n = 8), 20 nmol (n = 4). (C) Percentage change in individual responses to a nociceptive stimulus using the hot-plate test. (D) Daily cumulative trial times in the Morris water maze following intrahippocampal administration. Vehicle (n = 12), 1 nmol (n = 10), 2 nmol (n = 9), 4 nmol (n = 8).

Elevated plus maze

Increased levels of anxiety-like behaviour were observed after administration of Thio-4-PIOL across all dosage groups, seen in the percentage of time on the open arm [F(3,25) = 6.084; P = 0.003] (Figure 6B), the number of open arm entries [F(3,25) = 6.615; P = 0.002, data not shown], and the latency to first enter the open arm [F(3,25) = 7.881; P = 0.001; data not shown]. As observed in first 5 min of open field testing, administration of Thio-4-PIOL caused a significant decrease in locomotor activity on the EPM [number of closed arm entries: F(3,25) = 4.340; P = 0.014, data not shown], again only affecting animals from the 10 nmol and 20 nmol but not the 5 nmol group within this time frame.

Hot plate test

Effects of Thio-4-PIOL on pain sensitivity were assessed in the hot plate test and expressed as percentage change in latency to withdraw the paw from the individual baseline. Thio-4-PIOL significantly affected pain responsiveness [overall effect: F(3,21) = 3.104; P = 0.049], attributed to the strong increase in pain threshold in the 20 nmol group (Figure 6C).

Morris water maze

A repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant effect of time [F(3, 105) = 2.72, P < 0.05] and treatment [F(3, 35) = 3.81, P < 0.05] but no interaction effect [F(9, 105) = 0.76 P > 0.05] on performance during the training portion of the experiment. The group treated with the highest dose of Thio-4-PIOL (4 nmol) displayed impaired spatial learning compared with the vehicle-treated group as revealed by post hoc testing (P < 0.01; Figure 6D). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of treatment [F(3, 35) = 3.9, P < 0.05] on time spent in the target quadrant during the probe trial. A post hoc test revealed the group treated Thio-4-PIOL (4 nmol) spent significantly less time in the target quadrant compared to animals treated with vehicle alone (P < 0.05; data not shown). Swim speed or distance travelled in the probe trial was unaffected by any of the doses of Thio-4-PIOL tested [one-way ANOVA F(3, 35) = 0.82, P < 0.05 and F(3, 35) = 0.82, P < 0.05] (data not shown).

Discussion and conclusions

The realization that the same abundance making GABAARs attractive drug targets in a wide range of disorders also seems to be the origin of many of the side effects associated with the GABAergic drugs has prompted the search for new drugs with specific activity at selected subtypes. This is perhaps best illustrated by the achievements in the benzodiazepine field. Here, it has proven difficult to develop subtype-selective benzodiazepine derivatives in terms of binding affinity, whereas several functionally selective modulators displaying very different intrinsic activities at the α1,2,3,5βγ2 subtypes have emerged (Atack, 2011a,b; Ebert et al., 2006). In contrast to the extensive research into allosteric modulators of GABAARs, medicinal chemistry efforts focused on orthosteric ligands have been sparse, and only a few of these ligands have been characterized functionally at more than one subtype (Frølund et al., 2002). While the pronounced conservation of the orthosteric sites in the GABAAR subtypes may seem discouraging for the prospects of developing subtype-selective orthosteric ligands, the recent ‘rediscovery’ of THIP as an α4βδ/α6βδ-selective agonist has demonstrated that indeed, it is possible to obtain functionally selective orthosteric ligands (Storustovu and Ebert, 2006). In the present study, we present another such ligand, Thio-4-PIOL.

The functional profile exhibited by Thio-4-PIOL at recombinant GABAARs in this study is generally in concordance with observations made in previous studies, where Thio-4-PIOL has been shown to exhibit low micromolar binding affinities to native and recombinant GABAARs (Frølund et al., 1995; Ebert et al., 1997), to be a very low-efficacious agonist at α1β2γ2S and at native GABAARs in cortical neurons (Frølund et al., 1995; Mortensen et al., 2002; 2004) and to be a competitive antagonist at 10 α1,2,3,61,2,32 combinations (Ebert et al., 1997). However, the compound has also been reported to be a competitive antagonist at α5β3γ2 GABAAR (Ebert et al., 1997), which contrasts with its partial agonism at the receptor in the present study (Figure 2). Thus, it seems that the system used by Ebert et al. may have underestimated the apparent efficacy of partial agonists (Ebert et al., 1997). This discrepancy may either be due to relatively low expression levels or a relatively slow equilibrium rate, and this could also explain the lower agonist efficacy exhibited by Thio-4-PIOL at α4β3δ-expressing oocytes in a 2006 study (Storustovu and Ebert, 2006) compared with this study (4.4 vs. 28%; Table 1). Thus, the key finding in this study is that Thio-4-PIOL in addition to its very low agonist efficacy (de facto antagonism) at synaptic GABAARs exhibits pronounced agonist efficacy at some of the major extrasynaptic GABAARs, more specifically the β3-containing α5βγ2, α4βδ and α6βδ subtypes.

The functional properties of Thio-4-PIOL are quite remarkable from a molecular perspective. Analogously to THIP, the compound is a more efficacious agonist at the extrasynaptic δ-containing subtypes (in particular α4β3δ and α6β3δ) than at the synaptic receptors. Compared with the ‘superagonism’ and full/partial agonism displayed by THIP at α4/6βδ and α1/2/3βγ2S receptors, respectively (Ebert et al., 2006; Storustovu and Ebert, 2006), the profile of Thio-4-PIOL can be considered as a parallel shift to partial agonism and de facto antagonism at the two respective receptor classes. The higher relative agonist efficacies displayed by Thio-4-PIOL at the α4β3δ, α6β3δ and α5β3γ2 receptors than at the corresponding β2-containing subtypes is also interesting, although the concomitant expression of ‘low efficacy’ α6β3δ and α5β3γ2 populations in other oocytes should be noted (Table 1). In any case, this is the first example of an orthosteric ligand evoking a differential response through α4β2δ and α4β3δ GABAARs, even if the functional difference between the two receptors in this case is rather small. It remains to be investigated whether these differences can be ascribed to specific molecular determinants in the receptor subunits or arise from different kinetic activation thresholds in the receptors.

The functional properties displayed by Thio-4-PIOL at recombinant human GABAARs are mirrored by its activity in rat CA1 hippocampus and ventrobasal thalamus neurons. The bulk of the massive tonic current elicited by Thio-4-PIOL in the hippocampus is likely to arise from activation of α5βγ2 receptors, although non-α5/δ-containing (α4βδ) subtypes and ‘pure’ αβ combinations also have been proposed to contribute to tonic inhibition here (Glykys and Mody, 2006; Mortensen and Smart, 2006; Glykys et al., 2008). In contrast, the tonic current produced by Thio-4-PIOL in the thalamus most likely originates from activation of α4βδ receptors (Pirker et al., 2000; Belelli et al., 2005; Chandra et al., 2006). Considering the agonism of Thio-4-PIOL at α6βδ GABAARs (Figure 2), Thio-4-PIOL is also likely to induce tonic inhibition in cerebellar granule cells and other neurons expressing this third major extrasynaptic receptor but this remains to be investigated (Pirker et al., 2000; Olsen and Sieghart, 2009). As for the antagonistic effects of Thio-4-PIOL on phasic current in CA1 hippocampal neurons, the reduction in amplitude and mIPSC frequency observed upon application of increasing concentrations of Thio-4-PIOL (Figure 5C–E) correlates well with its negligible agonist activity and de facto antagonism at α1,2,3β2,3γ2S receptors (Figure 3).

Just as the activity of Thio-4-PIOL in the slice recordings seem to reflect its functional profile in vitro, so do the behavioural effects of the compound in preclinical behavioural tests of anxiety, locomotion, nociception and spatial learning (Figure 6). These processes were investigated due to the large influence the GABAergic system has on emotion (Cryan and Kaupmann, 2005; Möhler, 2012), pain signalling (Neto et al., 2006; Mirza and Munro, 2010) and cognition (Maubach, 2003; Möhler, 2009). Thio-4-PIOL produces an anxiogenic-like effect in the EPM at doses of 5, 10 and 20 nmol (Figure 6B). However, a clear dissociation between the effects of Thio-4-PIOL on locomotor activity during the first 5 min and on anxiety-like behaviour is present and furthermore, swimming activity in the Morris water maze revealed no effect on locomotion. The reduction in locomotor activity observed at the 10 and 20 nmol doses in the open field test confounds interpretation of the behavioural effects in the EPM, and thus, we refrain from concluding on its anxiogenic effects at these higher doses (Figure 6A and B). We interpret the anxiogenic effects of Thio-4-PIOL at the 5 nmol dose to arise as a consequence of its antagonism of the synaptic GABAARs, as they are consistent with the anxiolytic effects of GABAAR agonists and PAMs (Krogsgaard-Larsen et al., 2004; Korpi and Sinkkonen, 2006; Atack, 2011a; Smith and Rudolph, 2012; Smith et al., 2012) and with the anxiogenic effects of GABAAR antagonists (Miller et al., 2010). The antagonism of synaptic GABAARs is likely to be a contributing factor to the reduced locomotor activity observed upon Thio-4-PIOL administration, just as the seizures observed in some rats (not included in the studies) could arise from the inhibition of a1bg and other synaptic subtypes (not included in the studies) (Huang et al., 2001; Elsen et al., 2006; Korpi and Sinkkonen, 2006). On the other hand, the significantly increased pain threshold in rats in the hot-plate test upon injection of 20 nmol Thio-4-PIOL (Figure 6C) cannot necessarily be ascribed to its inhibition of synaptic GABAARs. Even though bicuculline has displayed analgesic effects in animal tests (Hasanein et al., 2008), it has a wide range of GABAAR agonists and PAMs (Enna and McCarson, 2006; Munro et al., 2008).

A large corpus of data has been collected, which places the GABAergic system as a key modulator of cognitive processes, with α5-containing GABAARs emerging as one of the primary regulators (Möhler, 2009). Mice displaying a genetic reduction to α5-containing GABAARs have displayed improved spatial memory in a previous study (Collinson et al., 2002), and RO4938581, an inverse agonist at α5-containing GABAARs, improves spatial memory in rats (Chambers et al., 2004; Ballard et al., 2009). In contrast, genetic reduction in α5-containing GABAARs has also been reported to impair memory associated with locating objects (Prut et al., 2010). Interestingly, in the present study, intrahippocampal Thio-4-PIOL (4 nmol), a partial agonist at α5-containing GABAARs, impaired the acquisition of spatial memory independently of any effect on swimming ability.

In conclusion, Thio-4-PIOL is only the second orthosteric GABAAR ligand to have been subjected to an elaborate characterization at recombinant and native receptors, and in relevant animal models. The behavioural effects of Thio-4-PIOL are quite illustrative of a fundamental difference between a functionally selective orthosteric ligand and the new generations of functionally subtype-selective PAMs and negative allosteric modulators: an allosteric modulator will not influence the signalling through those subtypes at which it has insignificant efficacy, whereas an orthosteric ligand with negligible efficacy, being a competitive antagonist, certainly will do so. While Thio-4-PIOL is an unlikely candidate to be a future therapeutic agent, the distinct intrinsic activities of the agonist at extrasynaptic and synaptic GABAARs and its ability to concomitantly induce tonic inhibition and antagonize phasic current in the GABA system make for a unique ligand and a potentially valuable pharmacological tool for explorations of the physiological roles of the respective subtypes. The examples of THIP and Thio-4-PIOL underline the possibility of obtaining functional selectivity in orthosteric GABAAR ligands and are in line with observations made in the nicotinic Ach receptor field, where several subtype-selective agonists rooted in differential efficacies at the respective subtypes have been identified (Jensen et al., 2005). Thus, the results of this study call for a functional characterization of other orthosteric GABAAR ligands in a similar elaborate manner.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation, Direktør Ib Henriksens Foundation, the Carlsberg Foundation, the Danish Medical Research Council and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. Dr. Paul J. Whiting (Merck, Sharpe and Dohme Research Laboratories) is thanked for the generous gifts of GABAAR cDNAs.

Glossary

GABAAR

GABAA receptor

GHB

γ-hydroxybutyric acid

mIPSC

miniature IPSC

PAM

positive allosteric modulator

RS

series resistance

TEVC

two-electrode voltage clamp

Thio-4-PIOL

5-(4-piperidyl)-3-isothiazolol

THIP

4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol

Supporting information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.12340

Figure S1 The functional properties of THIP at extrasynaptic α4βδ GABAA receptors. Concentration-response curves for THIP at human α4β2δ (n = 2) and α4β3δ (n = 3) GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

bph0170-0919-SD1.docx (445.4KB, docx)

References

  1. Absalom N, Eghorn LF, Villumsen IS, Karim N, Bay T, Olsen JV, et al. α4βδ GABAA receptors are high-affinity targets for γ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:13404–13409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204376109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander SPH, Mathie A, Peters JA. Guide to receptors and channels (GRAC), 5th edn. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(Suppl 1):S1–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01649_1.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen JW, Yaksh TL. Assessment of acute thermal nociception in laboratory animals. Methods Mol Med. 2004;99:11–23. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-770-x:139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atack JR. GABAA receptor subtype-selective modulators. I. α2/α3-selective agonists as non-sedating anxiolytics. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011a;11:1176–1202. doi: 10.2174/156802611795371350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atack JR. GABAA receptor subtype-selective modulators. II. α5-selective inverse agonists for cognition enhancement. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011b;11:1203–1214. doi: 10.2174/156802611795371314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ballard TM, Knoflach F, Prinssen E, Borroni E, Vivian JA, Basile J, et al. RO4938581, a novel cognitive enhancer acting at GABAA α5 subunit-containing receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009;202:207–223. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1357-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Belelli D, Peden DR, Rosahl TW, Wafford KA, Lambert JJ. Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors of thalamocortical neurons: a molecular target for hypnotics. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11513–11520. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2679-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Belelli D, Harrison NL, Maguire J, Macdonald RL, Walker MC, Cope DW. Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors: form, pharmacology, and function. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12757–12763. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3340-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chambers MS, Atack JR, Carling RW, Collinson N, Cook SM, Dawson GR, et al. An orally bioavailable, functionally selective inverse agonist at the benzodiazepine site of GABAA α5 receptors with cognition enhancing properties. J Med Chem. 2004;47:5829–5832. doi: 10.1021/jm040863t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chandra D, Jia F, Liang J, Peng Z, Suryanarayanan A, Werner DF, et al. GABAA receptor α4 subunits mediate extrasynaptic inhibition in thalamus and dentate gyrus and the action of gaboxadol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:15230–15235. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604304103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chisari M, Wu K, Zorumski CF, Mennerick S. Hydrophobic anions potently and uncompetitively antagonize GABAA receptor function in the absence of a conventional binding site. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:667–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01396.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Collinson N, Kuenzi FM, Jarolimek W, Maubach KA, Cothliff R, Sur C, et al. Enhanced learning and memory and altered GABAergic synaptic transmission in mice lacking the α5 subunit of the GABAA receptor. J Neurosci. 2002;22:5572–5580. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05572.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Collinson N, Atack JR, Laughton P, Dawson GR, Stephens DN. An inverse agonist selective for α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors improves encoding and recall but not consolidation in the Morris water maze. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;188:619–628. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0361-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cryan JF, Kaupmann K. Don't worry ‘B’ happy!: a role for GABAB receptors in anxiety and depression. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005;26:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Da Settimo F, Taliani S, Trincavelli ML, Montali M, Martini C. GABAA/Bz receptor subtypes as targets for selective drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:2680–2701. doi: 10.2174/092986707782023190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ebert B, Thompson SA, Saounatsou K, McKernan R, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Wafford KA. Differences in agonist/antagonist binding affinity and receptor transduction using recombinant human γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1997;52:1150–1156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ebert B, Wafford KA, Deacon S. Treating insomnia: current and investigational pharmacological approaches. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112:612–629. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Elsen FP, Liljelund P, Werner DF, Olsen RW, Homanics GE, Harrison NL. GABAA-R α1 subunit knockin mutation leads to abnormal EEG and anesthetic-induced seizure-like activity in mice. Brain Res. 2006;1078:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Enna SJ, McCarson KE. The role of GABA in the mediation and perception of pain. Adv Pharmacol. 2006;54:1–27. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(06)54001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Frølund B, Kristiansen U, Brehm L, Hansen AB, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Falch E. Partial GABAA receptor agonists. Synthesis and in vitro pharmacology of a series of nonannulated analogs of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol. J Med Chem. 1995;38:3287–3296. doi: 10.1021/jm00017a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Frølund B, Ebert B, Kristiansen U, Liljefors T, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. GABAA receptor ligands and their therapeutic potentials. Curr Top Med Chem. 2002;2:817–832. doi: 10.2174/1568026023393525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Glykys J, Mody I. Hippocampal network hyperactivity after selective reduction of tonic inhibition in GABAA receptor α5 subunit-deficient mice. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95:2796–2807. doi: 10.1152/jn.01122.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Glykys J, Mody I. Activation of GABAA receptors: views from outside the synaptic cleft. Neuron. 2007;56:763–770. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Glykys J, Mann EO, Mody I. Which GABAA receptor subunits are necessary for tonic inhibition in the hippocampus? J Neurosci. 2008;28:1421–1426. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4751-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gosselin RD, O'Connor RM, Tramullas M, Julio-Pieper M, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Riluzole normalizes early-life stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity in rats: role of spinal glutamate reuptake mechanisms. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2418–2425. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hasanein P, Mirazi N, Javanmardi K. GABAA receptors in the central nucleus of amygdala (CeA) affect on pain modulation. Brain Res. 2008;1241:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoestgaard-Jensen K, Dalby NO, Wolinsky TD, Murphey C, Jones KA, Rottlander M, et al. Pharmacological characterization of a novel positive modulator at α4β3δ-containing extrasynaptic GABAA receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2010;58:702–711. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang RQ, Bell-Horner CL, Dibas MI, Covey DF, Drewe JA, Dillon GH. Pentylenetetrazole-induced inhibition of recombinant gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors: mechanism and site of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;298:986–995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jacobson LH, Cryan JF. Evaluation of the anxiolytic-like profile of the GABAB receptor positive modulator CGP7930 in rodents. Neuropharmacology. 2008;54:854–862. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jensen AA, Frølund B, Liljefors T, Krogsgaard-Larsen P. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: structural revelations, target identifications, and therapeutic inspirations. J Med Chem. 2005;48:4705–4745. doi: 10.1021/jm040219e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jensen AA, Bergmann ML, Sander T, Balle T. Ginkgolide X is a potent antagonist of anionic Cys-loop receptors with a unique selectivity profile at glycine receptors. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:10141–10153. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.079319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaupmann K, Cryan JF, Wellendorph P, Mombereau C, Sansig G, Klebs K, et al. Specific γ-hydroxybutyrate-binding sites but loss of pharmacological effects of γ-hydroxybutyrate in GABAB1-deficient mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;18:2722–2730. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2003.03013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. NC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1577–1579. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Korpi ER, Sinkkonen ST. GABAA receptor subtypes as targets for neuropsychiatric drug development. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;109:12–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Krashia P, Moroni M, Broadbent S, Hofmann G, Kracun S, Beato M, et al. Human α3β4 neuronal nicotinic receptors show different stoichiometry if they are expressed in Xenopus oocytes or mammalian HEK293 cells. Plos One. 2010;5:e13611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Frølund B, Liljefors T, Ebert B. GABAA agonists and partial agonists: THIP (Gaboxadol) as a non-opioid analgesic and a novel type of hypnotic. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68:1573–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McGrath J, Drummond G, McLachlan E, Kilkenny C, Wainwright C. Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1573–1576. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00873.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McKernan DP, Fitzgerald P, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. The probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 displays visceral antinociceptive effects in the rat. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:1029–1035. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01520.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. McKernan RM, Whiting PJ. Which GABAA-receptor subtypes really occur in the brain? Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:139–143. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)80023-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Madsen C, Jensen AA, Liljefors T, Kristiansen U, Nielsen B, Hansen CP, et al. 5-Substituted imidazole-4-acetic acid analogues: synthesis, modeling, and pharmacological characterization of a series of novel γ-aminobutyric acidC receptor agonists. J Med Chem. 2007;50:4147–4161. doi: 10.1021/jm070447j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Marowsky A, Rudolph U, Fritschy JM, Arand M. Tonic inhibition in principal cells of the amygdala: a central role for α3 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. J Neurosci. 2012;32:8611–8619. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4404-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Maubach K. GABAA receptor subtype selective cognition enhancers. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2003;2:233–239. doi: 10.2174/1568007033482779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehta AK, Muschaweck NM, Maeda DY, Coop A, Ticku MK. Binding characteristics of the gamma-hydroxybutyric acid receptor antagonist [3H](2E)-(5-hydroxy-5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[a][7]annulen-6-ylidene) ethanoic acid in the rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;299:1148–1153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Miller PS, Smart TG. Binding, activation and modulation of Cys-loop receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31:161–174. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Miller SM, Piasecki CC, Peabody MF, Lonstein JS. GABAA receptor antagonism in the ventrocaudal periaqueductal gray increases anxiety in the anxiety-resistant postpartum rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010;95:457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mirza NR, Munro G. The role of GABAA receptor subtypes as analgesic targets. Drug News Perspect. 2010;23:351–360. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.6.1489909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Möhler H. Role of GABAA receptors in cognition. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37(Pt 6):1328–1333. doi: 10.1042/BST0371328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Möhler H. The GABA system in anxiety and depression and its therapeutic potential. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mortensen M, Smart TG. Extrasynaptic αβ subunit GABAA receptors on rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Physiol. 2006;577:841–856. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.117952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mortensen M, Frølund B, Jørgensen AT, Liljefors T, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Ebert B. Activity of novel 4-PIOL analogues at human α1β2γ2S GABAA receptors – correlation with hydrophobicity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;451:125–132. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)02271-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mortensen M, Kristiansen U, Ebert B, Frølund B, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Smart TG. Activation of single heteromeric GABAA receptor ion channels by full and partial agonists. J Physiol. 2004;557:389–413. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.054734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Munro G, Lopez-Garcia JA, Rivera-Arconada I, Erichsen HK, Nielsen EO, Larsen JS, et al. Comparison of the novel subtype-selective GABAA receptor-positive allosteric modulator NS11394 [3′-[5-(1-hydroxy-1-methyl-ethyl)-benzoimidazol-1-yl]-biphenyl-2-carbonitrile] with diazepam, zolpidem, bretazenil, and gaboxadol in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;327:969–981. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.144568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nemeroff CB. The role of GABA in the pathophysiology and treatment of anxiety disorders. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2003;37:133–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Neto FL, Ferreira-Gomes J, Castro-Lopes JM. Distribution of GABA receptors in the thalamus and their involvement in nociception. Adv Pharmacol. 2006;54:29–51. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(06)54002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. O'Malley D, Julio-Pieper M, Gibney SM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Distinct alterations in colonic morphology and physiology in two rat models of enhanced stress-induced anxiety and depression-like behaviour. Stress. 2010;13:114–122. doi: 10.3109/10253890903067418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Olsen RW, Sieghart W. GABAA receptors: subtypes provide diversity of function and pharmacology. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Orser BA, Canning KJ, Macdonald JF. Mechanisms of general anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15:427–433. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200208000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 4th edn. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pirker S, Schwarzer C, Wieselthaler A, Sieghart W, Sperk G. GABAA receptors: immunocytochemical distribution of 13 subunits in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience. 2000;101:815–850. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00442-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Prut L, Prenosil G, Willadt S, Vogt K, Fritschy JM, Crestani F. A reduction in hippocampal GABAA receptor α5 subunits disrupts the memory for location of objects in mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2010;9:478–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Smith KS, Rudolph U. Anxiety and depression: mouse genetics and pharmacological approaches to the role of GABAA receptor subtypes. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Smith KS, Engin E, Meloni EG, Rudolph U. Benzodiazepine-induced anxiolysis and reduction of conditioned fear are mediated by distinct GABAA receptor subtypes in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2012;63:250–258. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Søgaard R, Werge TM, Bertelsen C, Lundbye C, Madsen KL, Nielsen CH, et al. GABAA receptor function is regulated by lipid bilayer elasticity. Biochemistry. 2006;45:13118–13129. doi: 10.1021/bi060734+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Storustovu SI, Ebert B. Pharmacological characterization of agonists at delta-containing GABAA receptors: functional selectivity for extrasynaptic receptors is dependent on the absence of γ2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;316:1351–1359. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.092403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Taylor M, Bhagwagar Z, Cowen PJ, Sharp T. GABA and mood disorders. Psychol Med. 2003;33:387–393. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vorhees CV, Williams MT. Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:848–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Vorhees CV, Inman-Wood SL, Morford LL, Broening HW, Fukumura M, Moran MS. Adult learning deficits after neonatal exposure to d-methamphetamine: selective effects on spatial navigation and memory. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4732–4739. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-12-04732.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wafford KA, van Niel MB, Mab QP, Horridge E, Herd MB, Peden DR, et al. Novel compounds selectively enhance δ subunit containing GABAA receptors and increase tonic currents in thalamus. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Whiting PJ. GABA-A receptor subtypes in the brain: a paradigm for CNS drug discovery? Drug Discov Today. 2003;8:445–450. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02703-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zellner JL, Cook JA, Reines HD, Smith EF, 3rd, Kessler LD, Halushka PV. Effect of a LTD4 receptor antagonist in porcine septic shock. Eicosanoids. 1991;4:169–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

bph0170-0919-SD1.docx (445.4KB, docx)

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES