Abstract
A nanogate composed of two iminodiacetic acid (IDA) and a metal ion latch was designed, synthesized and assembled on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. This gating mechanism is capable of storing and releasing metal ions and molecules trapped in the pores. Pore openings derivatized with IDA can be latched shut by forming a bis-IDA chelate complex with a metal ion. This system was tested by loading with Hoechst 33342 as the probe cargo molecule, and latching with cobalt, nickel or calcium metal ions. No cargo release was observed in a neutral aqueous environment, but both cargoes were delivered after acid stimulation and/or the addition of a competitively binding ligand.
Introduction
Nanoparticles of MCM-41 silica, a type of mesoporous nanomaterial, have found a variety of applications in many fields.1-6 In the area of drug delivery, their large pore volume, easily accessible pores, well-established surface chemistry and high rate of endocytosis by mammalian cells makes them versatile nanocontainers.4, 5, 7-10 Nanomachines are increasingly being employed on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) for stimuli-responsive delivery of cargo molecules from the pores. Numerous organo-functionalized silicas have been designed on MSN for the purpose of pore control. Researchers have exploited a creative variety of both covalent and non-covalent systems to achieve this goal, including supramolecular nanovalves, 11-17 snap-tops,18 polymer networks,19 metal nanocrystals,20 biomolecules,21 light-responsive nanogates,22 magnetic field-responsive nanogates,23 nanoimpellers,24 cleavable chemical bonds,25 and hydrophobicity.26 These methods have demonstrated the stimulated release of a variety of ∼1-2 nm sized cargo molecules, but are unable to hold back small metal ions in pores. Reversible chelation on nanoparticles has been used to bind and release metal ions, but did not trap and release molecules from pores.27-29
Many metal ions play important biological roles and are the active center of enzymes, proteins, vitamins, and coenzymes.30,31Calcium is heavily regulated in eukaryotic cells as a reflection of its important role in a number of physiological processes, notably in inducing apoptosis.32,33 Normally regulated and stored in the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria inside cells, calcium stimulates an apoptotic cycle when present in the cell cytoplasm.34,35 MSNs have been shown to be endocytosed by cells, resulting in colocalization in endosomes and finally endosomal escape through a “proton sponge effect” which results in payload delivery to the cell cytoplasm. Endosomal pH can be as low as 4.5 and more commonly in the range of pH 5-7. 17
Delivery of traditional anti-cancer drugs such as camptothecin with MSN has also shown high efficacy and cell killing compared to the free drug.17 A delivery system capable of delivering both therapeutic cargo molecules and bio-relevant metal ions would be more efficient than single cargo nanocarriers and could take advantage of synergistic interactions. In this paper we demonstrate a method that utilizes coordination chemistry in order to achieve the objective of carrying and releasing both metal ions and biologically useful organic cargo molecules from MSN.
Results and Discussion
Design of the Gate
In the design of this system, a swinging gate with a latch was synthesized and assembled on MSN to control pore access. Two gates freely swinging on hinges can be locked in place with a latch. The latch serves a dual purpose of being a desired cargo type and latching the gates shut. When situated around the pore openings, these gates regulate entrance to the pore interiors (Figure 1b). Cargo molecules are free to diffuse in and out of the pores when the gates are unlatched, but when a metal ion is present, cargo is trapped as a result of latching the nanogate shut. Using this design strategy, iminodiaacetic acid (IDA), a chelating agent, is selected as the gate and a metal ion integrated as the latch.
Iminodiaacetic acid has a chelating property similar to that of one-half of an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) molecule. When IDA is attached to silica with a flexible linker, two neighboring IDA molecules can bind strongly to a metal ion. The IDA binding constant with various metal centers exhibits a ∼103 decrease upon changing the pH from neutral to mildly acidic as a result of protonation of the Lewis base chelating groups.28,29 This property is the basis for the mechanism of operation of the pH responsive nanogate. A flexible linker bonded to the amine moiety results in one point of attachment to the nanoparticle surface, creating a potentially tridentate ligand that is free to swing when unlatched.44 The introduction of a metal ion results in a bis-IDA complex, joining two IDA molecules to the metal ion forming M(IDA)2 tethered to the MSN at the end of each ligand. When the chelation occurs over a pore opening the system can trap and release molecules into and from the pores (Figure 1b). Since IDA can form stable complexes with many different transition metal ions,36,37 this system can function with a variety of different metal latches. Co(II), Ni(II) and Ca2+ (that have 107, 108, and 102 order of magnitude formation constants, respectively) were chosen for this study.37,38
MSNs were synthesized using a surfactant-templated sol-gel process producing spherical nanoparticles ∼100 nm in diameter. Acid removal of the templating agent resulted in hexagonally arranged mesopores about 2.2 nm in diameter (Figure 1a, S1). Because of the aqueous synthesis conditions, MSNs have a high surface silanol density and additional treatments to functionalize the particles are not required. The IDA swinging gates were attached to the silanols through a post-synthesis grafting method shown in Figure 2.39
Because of its existence as a zwitterion, IDA required conversion to an ester in order to allow for nucleophilic substitution to the halogenated alkoxysilane. This was accomplished by reacting IDA with oxalyl chloride in methanol, and nucleophilic substitution of 3-iodopropyltriethoxysilane. The triethoxysilane intermediate was attached to the particle surface through a condensation reaction with surface Si-OH (See Experimental Section). After grafting on the particle surface, the methyl ester was hydrolyzed to restore IDA (Figure 2a).
Characterization
Synthesized MSN quality was confirmed through XRD and TEM measurements. TEM was used to confirm the distribution of particle sizes between 80-120 nm. Image analysis software of nanoparticles viewed directly down the axis of the pore structure showed that the nanoparticles had pore diameters of 2.2 nm (Figure S1, Figure 1a). The hexagonal pore arrangement observed in Figure 1a is confirmed by higher order Bragg peaks shown in the powder XRD which can be indexed as the (100), (110) and (200) planes (Figure S2) with a lattice spacing of 4 nm. Complete removal of the templating agent was confirmed with FTIR spectroscopy with the disappearance of the C-H stretching peaks at 3000 cm−1 after acid extraction (Figure S3). The synthesis of compounds 1 and 2 were verified with 1H NMR (see Experimental Section). Successful attachment of the nanogate was confirmed through CP-MAS solid state 29Si NMR with the appearance of two signals at −54 and −72 ppm as di- and tri-functionalized Si-C (Figure S4b), respectively. Additionally, a IDA carbonyl peak was observed in solid state 13C NMR at 149 ppm, a corresponding α-carbon at 128 ppm, and the aliphatic carbons appearing between 10-50 ppm, indicating successful attachment of the nanogate thread (Figure S4a).
Loading and Release
After confirmation of successful nanogate grafting, the machine was assembled through a process of loading an organic molecule, latching the gates with a metal ion, and washing away any excess cargo. Hoechst 33342, a dye commonly used as a nuclear stain in cells was chosen as the probe for its ease of detection and its similar size characteristics to those of therapeutic drugs. By monitoring the fluorescence intensity of Hoechst, a real-time release profile can be generated. From previous studies of grafted molecules, we estimate an average of four gates around each pore opening, corresponding to two assembled nanogates per pore (Figure 1b).15 Based on molecular size estimates, when closed, this number of nanogates is more than enough to prevent leakage of cargo molecules between 1-2 nm. Loading of Hoechst dye was accomplished by suspending IDA modified nanoparticles in a concentrated solution of the dye and allowing sufficient time for the dye molecules to diffuse inside the pores.
Cobalt Latch
The Hoechst loaded nanoparticles were latched shut after introducing a metal ion. Cobalt was chosen as the first metal latch because of its stability, solubility, and large binding constant with IDA. Introducing the Co2+ ion latches the nanogates together by bringing two IDA units together (Figure 2b). In order to remove any surface adsorbed Hoechst and unbound cobalt, the pale yellow particles were washed with aliquots of fresh ddH2O until the rinses no longer exhibited any fluorescence.
To assess the functioning of the nanogates, release of Hoechst dye was monitored using a time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy method. The fully assembled and latched nanoparticles were placed in a corner of a glass cuvette and an excitation beam (377 nm) was used to excite any dye released into the supernatant (Figure S7). The corresponding emission spectrum was collected to generate a time-resolved release profile.
Acid Release
After collecting baseline fluorescence, the machine was activated by slightly acidifying the solution. Trace 1 in Figure 3a shows that at neutral pH no Hoechst fluorescence is detected indicating no observable cargo leakage of Hoechst molecules at neutral pH. After adjusting the solution to a pH of 5, a large increase in solution fluorescence is observed, indicating a release of Hoechst molecules from the pores into solution stimulated by the acidification. In order to differentiate between surface-adsorbed dye from dye stored in the pores and to assess hydrogen bonding strengths between IDA dimers, a control experiment was performed where IDA modified particles were loaded with Hoechst but left unlatched by omitting the cobalt attachment step. This sample was subjected to a similar washing procedure and “released” by adjusting the solution pH to 5. Trace 3 in Figure 3a shows no Hoechst release after acidification, indicating that the loaded Hoechst cargo was removed during the washing steps. This also indicates that the amount of positively charged Hoechst adsorbed on the surface silanols (which ionize into Si-O− in neutral pH)40 is insignificant when compared to the amount capable of being stored and delivered through pore control (Figure 3b). Additionally, hydrogen bonding between two IDA dimers does not result in unintentionally latching the nanogates and holding back cargo.
After completion of each time-resolved fluorescence spectra, the amount of cobalt removed from the nanogates was analyzed through ICP-OES analysis. For the sample loaded with Hoechst and latched with cobalt, the addition of acid resulted in cobalt unbinding (Figure 3b1). Because of the strength of the electrostatic interaction between doubly cationic cobalt and surface Si-O− groups, Co2+ was difficult to completely remove from the particle surface with washings. As a result, after subjecting Hoechst loaded cobalt latched nanoparticles to 24 hour soaking period, a small quantity of cobalt was still removable from the particle surface (Figure 3b2). It is important to note that this unbinding of cobalt is not coupled with Hoechst cargo release. This result indicates that at least two differently bound forms of cobalt are removed from MSN: surface adsorbed cobalt as a result of electrostatic interactions with silica, and chelated cobalt bound in the IDA nanogates.
After complete release, the total weight percent of dye was calculated through UV-Vis absorption measurements of the solution supernatant. The observed 2% weight of Hoechst is a typical delivery capacity of MSN loaded with Hoechst.41 Additionally, a 0.2% weight release of cobalt was observed. In terms of molar concentration, this amount is on the order of Hoechst released; 5 mg of gated particles can release ∼0.2 μmols of Hoechst and cobalt, demonstrating that the system is capable of delivering comparable molar quantities of both cargo types (Figure 3b1). The large amount of cobalt released can be explained through examining the pore structure of MCM-41. Only nanogates present across the pore openings function in controlling Hoechst delivery. However, some derivatization of the particles with IDA also occurs on the outer surface, resulting in sites for metal ion chelation not used to control pore access but acting as cobalt storage (Figure 3c). Due to the large excess of cobalt used in latching the nanogate, these non-gating IDA moieties can also chelate cobalt, resulting in the large amount of cobalt released after acidification.
Competitive Binding Release
Since the nanogate trapping is dependent on the coordination of the metal center, removal of the metal center by a strong chelating agent dissolved in solution should also result in cargo release. To examine this, the cobalt latched nanogate was exposed to a molecule capable of competitively binding cobalt from IDA. Figure 3a trace 2 demonstrates that the addition of 2,2′-bipyridine (bipy) to the system results in the release of Hoechst cargo. Therefore, a second release method based on competitive binding is also possible. If a ligand that has a large binding constant with the metal ion is added to the system, that ligand competes with the IDA, binds with the metal, and thus opens the system. This result demonstrates that the removal of the metal center by a competing ligand unlatches the gate resulting in cargo delivery.
Nickel Latch
Since the amine and carboxylic acid groups on IDA can form strong coordinational bonds with a variety of transition metals, Ni2+ was also tested for a viable latch. Studies were performed using the same procedures as previously described. After loading with Hoechst cargo and latching the nanogate by introducing Ni2+, a baseline fluorescence was collected at neutral pH to verify the stability of the assembled machine. When the solution pH is adjusted to a pH of 5, a release of Hoechst into the solution was observed (Figure 4a). This result indicates that the IDA nanogate is tightly shut when latched with nickel and can also be used to deliver nickel ions after acidification. In an experiment similar to that of the cobalt latched nanogate, the nickel latched machine was also tested for release with competitive binding. A baseline fluorescence was also collected for a comparable time and released via the addition of bipy. Hoechst release is only observed after bipy addition, indicating a similar mechanism of trapping and release to that of the cobalt latched nanogates (Figure S5).
Calcium Latch
Calcium, a metal ion with important biological significance was also tested with this design. Because of its role as a regulator for cell apoptosis, a controlled delivery of calcium can potentially have therapeutic value. Therefore, the IDA nanogate system was tested for functionality with calcium ions. In a similar fashion as described above, Hoechst loaded IDA nanoparticles were latched by introducing Ca2+. A baseline was also collected for a comparable time to that for the transition metals and were released through acidification. No Hoechst cargo was observed to release until the pH of the solution was adjusted to a pH of 6, indicating the compatibility of calcium ion as a latch for this system (Figure 4b). Due to the lower binding affinity between calcium and IDA, Hoechst release was observed to begin at a higher pH value than that for the nickel and cobalt latched nanomachines. Since the stability of the formed metal inorganic complex is metal dependent, each nanogate built on a different metal center may be activated at different pH, depending on the metal IDA binding strengths. Using this design, a metal center can be chosen that responds only to strongly acidic conditions or if desired, a metal nanogate that responds to a more subtle pH change.
Summary
In summary, a new type of nanogate supported on MSN was successfully designed and synthesized. The fully assembled system is capable of simultaneously delivering both large and small molecules. In neutral conditions, the nanogate remains closed and cargo is stored, but the addition of acid opens the nanogate, releasing both metal ions and the large cargo molecules. Controlled cargo release was also demonstrated by activation through competitive binding. This system can potentially be expanded as a delivery system for a broad combination of cargo molecules and metal ions for biological application. By changing both the metal ion and/or choice of nanogate, the pH responsiveness can be tuned to allow for biological pH activation. Currently, this system is being optimized using different transition metal ions with the goal of developing a synergistic drug delivery system.
Experimental Section
General Comments
Chemicals used in this study were purchased from major chemical suppliers such as Sigma-Aldrich and Fisher Scientific and used without further purification. Release studies were obtained with an in-house time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy setup (Figure S7). A Coherent 377 nm CUBE laser was used to excite Hoechst dye, and the subsequent emission spectra monitored using a Princeton Instruments Roper CCD detector cooled to liquid nitrogen temperatures. ICP-OES measurements were made using a Thermo Jarrell Ash IRIS 1000 in a 5% HNO3 matrix. XRD measurements were made using a Panalytical X'Pert Pro powder diffractometer. 1H NMR was performed on a Bruker ARX400 spectrometer in CDCl3 solution. Chemical shift is listed in ppm. The solvent signal was used as an internal standard. Solid state NMR was performed on a Bruker DSX300 spectrometer. TEM images were acquired on a JEM1200-EX microscope. SEM images were taken on a JSM-6701F microscope after coating with gold (5 nm) through plasma sputtering.
Synthesis of MCM-41 Nanoparticles
In a 250 mL round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, 0.25 g, 0.7 mmol) was added and dissolved in deionized water (120 mL) with heat. The temperature was stabilized at 80°C for 1 hour, and a NaOH solution (2 M, 870 μL, 1.7 mmol) was added to the mixture at a rate to maintain 80°C. Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS, 1.2 mL, 5.4 mmol) was then added dropwise over 10 minutes under vigorous stirring (800 RPM) and reacted for 2 hours at 80°C. After the allotted reaction time, the milky solution was allowed to cool to room temperature under stirring, and collected with centrifugation (7830 RPM, 15 min). The nanoparticles were washed with methanol until the washings showed a pH of 7. DLS readings of synthesized MSN in water indicate a low PDI (224 nm, PDI 0.01) on a ZetaPals instrument. MSN particle quality was confirmed through TEM / XRD measurements (Figure S1, S2).
Extraction of Templating Agent
In a 250 mL round bottom flask, synthesized MSN (120 mg) were suspended in methanol (75 mL) with vigorous stirring and water bath sonication. Under sonication, concentrated HCl (12 M, 4.2 mL) was added to the dropwise suspension where the solution became clearer, and refluxed for 8 hours under inert atmosphere. The particles were recollected through centrifugation (7830 RPM, 15 min) and washed with portions of methanol until washings showed a neutral pH. Complete extraction of CTAB from the pores was confirmed through IR spectroscopy (Figure S3). Surfactant extracted particles gave a more monodisperse DLS reading in water (180 nm, PDI 0.005).
Synthesis of Dimethyl Iminodiacetate
In a 500 mL round bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser and a magnetic stir bar, iminodiacetic acid (5 g, 38 mmol) was suspended in methanol (200 mL). The solution was cooled to 0° C while oxalyl chloride (7 mL, 82 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture in dropwise fashion. After complete addition of the oxalyl chloride, the solution was warmed to room temperature and refluxed overnight. The solvent was evaporated off giving a white powder (6 g). The powder was dissolved in water, neutralized with sodium carbonate and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 35 mL). The combined organic layers was washed with brine (60 mL), and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced atmosphere to give quantitative yields of a slightly yellow oil. 1H NMR (chloroform-d): δ 2.01 (s, 1H), δ 3.36 (s, 4H), δ 3.61 (s, 6H).
Synthesis of (Dimethyl Iminodiacetate)propyltriethoxysilane
In a 50 mL three-necked round bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser, gas inlet, and magnetic stir bar, dimethyl iminodiacetate (1 mL, 6 mmol), and 3-iodopropyltriethoxysilane (1 mL, 5 mmol) were dissolved in anhydrous toluene (5 mL). Catalytic amounts of N,N-diisopropylethylamine was added and the mixture allowed to react under dry nitrogen atmosphere overnight at reflux. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature, washed with 3 portions of water, brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The organic layer was then concentrated under reduced pressure and purified with column chromatography oven-dried silica gel (CH3Cl3 : hexanes = 2 : 1) to yield quantitative amounts of (dimethyl iminodiacetate)propyltriethoxysilane. 1H NMR (chloroform-d): δ 0.73 (t, 2H), δ 1.15 (t, 9H), δ 1.89 (m, 2H), δ 3.18 (t, 2H), δ 3.44 (s, 4H), δ 3.54 (q, 6H), δ 3.66 (s, 6H).
Synthesis of Dimethyl Iminodiacetate Modified Nanoparticles
In a 50 mL round bottom flask, MSN (50 mg) washed with toluene (2 × 10 mL) and were suspended in anhydrous toluene dried over calcium hydride (10 mL). (Dimethyl iminodiacetate)propyltriethoxysilane (30 μL, 0.08 mmol) dissolved in toluene (1 mL) was added to the MSN suspension heated overnight at reflux temperatures. The functionalized particles were collected through centrifugation (7830 RPM, 10 min) and washed with toluene (2 × 10 mL) and methanol (2 × 10 mL).
Synthesis of Iminodiacetic Acid Modified Nanoparticles (IDA-MSN)
A 50 mL round bottom flask was charged with a suspension of dimethyl iminodiacetate modified silica nanoparticles (30 mg) in doubly distilled water (25 mL). Concentrated HCl (1.5 mL) was slowly added to the reaction mixture under sonication and refluxed for six hours. The particles were recollected through centrifugation (7830 RPM, 10 min) and washed with methanol until the washings were of neutral pH. Successful functionalization of the silica surface was verified through solid state NMR (Figure S4a, S4b).
Loading of Hoechst 33342
IDA-MSN (10 mg) was washed twice with methanol and twice with doubly distilled water. After the solvent exchange, the particles were centrifuged and resuspended in a fresh solution of Hoechst 33342 in water (1 mM, 1 mL) and stirred overnight. The Hoechst loaded particles were collected through centrifugation (15,000 RPM, 3 min) and dried under vacuum.
Closing of the Nanogate and Loading of the Smaller Cargo
Hoechst loaded IDA-MSN (10 mg) was suspended in doubly distilled water (100 μL). For cobalt closed nanogates, cobalt(II) chloride (20 mg, 0.15 mmol) was added to the mixture and stirred for 6 hours. For nickel closed nanogates, nickel(II) chloride (20 mg, 0.15 mmol) was added instead. For calcium latched nanoparticles, calcium chloride (50 mg, 0.4 mmol) was added in a buffered solution (Tris buffered, pH 8) and stirred overnight. The assembled machine was collected through centrifugation (15,000 RPM, 3 min), washed with doubly distilled water until the washings no longer exhibited fluorescence under blacklight, and dried under vacuum.
Assessment of the Cargo Release
Hoechst loaded, metal ion capped IDA-MSN (5 mg) were confined to a corner of a rectangular glass cuvette. To this, doubly distilled water (4 mL) was added to the particles at a rate to limit particles from suspending in solution. A 377 nm excitation diode laser (14 mW) was directed through the solution supernatant. The emission of excited Hoechst dye present in the solution supernatant was monitored in real time by focusing the emitted light through a collecting lens, a 400 nm cutoff filter and a monochromator (300 nm window, centered on 500 nm) before integrating on a CCD detector (Figure S7). A baseline was collected over 2 hours of allowing suspended particles to settle before stimulating cargo release.
pH Activation
For pH released samples, after achieving a stable baseline with the setup as described above, a known quantity of dilute HCl freshly calibrated was added to adjust the solution pH to 5. A plot of fluorescence intensity with respect to time was generated through integrating fluorescence counts from 500-550 nm. After complete release, the supernatant was collected through centrifugation (7830 RPM, 25 min) and analyzed through UV-Vis to determine weight percent release of Hoechst dye. The amount of cobalt released was done through stabilizing dissolved metals by adding 70% HNO3 (307 μL) to the release supernatant and analysis with ICP-OES. Intensity of the analyzed samples were standardized using standard solutions made by diluting a stock solution (1000 ppm, Fisher Scientific) of cobalt or nickel or calcium. Each sample was run 3× to generate statistical data and error.
Competitive Binding Activation
For the nickel latched nanogate, after achieving a stable baseline plot with the above setup, solid 2,2′-bipyridine (15 mg) was added to the solution to saturate the solution. Competitive binding release studies with the cobalt latched nanogate were performed by adding 100 μL of a saturated solution of bipy in water to the 4 mL sample.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant NIH RO1 CA133697. The authors also acknowledge David Weiler for helpful discussions.
Footnotes
Supporting Information: Experimental, materials and methods, XRD of synthesized MSN, solid state 13C and 29Si NMR data, time-resolved fluorescent spectra release profiles of Ni(II) and Ca2+ latches with acid and competitive binding activation, UV-Vis spectra of cobalt IDA complexes after simulated loading conditions. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Browne RW, Feringa LB. Nat Nanotechnol. 2006;1:25–35. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2006.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lin YS, Hurley KR, Haynes CL. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:364–374. doi: 10.1021/jz2013837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cheon J, Lee JH. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1630–1640. doi: 10.1021/ar800045c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ambrogio WM, Thomas RC, Zhao Y, Zink IJ, Stoddart JF. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:903–913. doi: 10.1021/ar200018x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Slowing II, Trewyn GB, Giri S, Lin SV. Adv Funct Mater. 2007;17:1225–1236. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Davis ME. Nature. 2002;417:813–821. doi: 10.1038/nature00785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao SX, Lu QG, Whittaker KA, Millar JG, Zhu YH. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101:6525–6531. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vallet-Regi M, Ramila A, del Real PR, Perez-Pariente J Chem Mater. 2001;13:308–311. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kruk M, Jaroniec M. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101:583–589. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Slowing II, Escoto-Vivero JL, Wu CW, Lin VSY. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008:1278–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nguyen TD, Tseng HR, Celestre PC, Flood AH, Liu Y, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10029–10034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504109102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Trewyn BG, Slowing II, Giri S, Chen HT, Lin VSY. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:846–853. doi: 10.1021/ar600032u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ferris DP, Zhao YL, Khashab NM, Khatib HA, Stoddard JF, Zink JI. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:1686–1688. doi: 10.1021/ja807798g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhao Y, Li Z, Kabehie S, Botros YY, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13016–13025. doi: 10.1021/ja105371u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meng H, Xue M, Xia T, Zhao Y, Tamanoi F, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:12690–12697. doi: 10.1021/ja104501a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coti KK, Belowich ME, Liong M, Ambrogio MW, Lau TA, Khatib HA, Zink JI, Khashab NM, Stoddart JF. Nanoscale. 2009;1:16–39. doi: 10.1039/b9nr00162j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li Z, Barnes JC, Bosoy A, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2590–2605. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15246g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Patel K, Angelos S, Dichtel WR, Coskun A, Yang YW, Zink JI, Stoddart JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2382–2383. doi: 10.1021/ja0772086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fu Q, Rao VR, Ista LK, Wu Y, Andrzejewski BP, Sklar LA, Ward TL, Lopez GP. Adv Mater. 2003;15:1262–1266. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vivero-Escoto JL, Slowing II, Trewyn BG, Lin VSY. Small. 2010;6:1952–1967. doi: 10.1002/smll.200901789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Climent E, Martínez-Máñez R, Sancenón F, Marcos MD, Soto J, Maquieira A, Amorós P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:7281–7283. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mal NK, Fujiwari M, Tanaka Y. Nature. 2003;23:350–353. doi: 10.1038/nature01362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Thomas CR, Ferris DP, Lee JH, Choi E, Kim ES, Stoddart JF, Shin JS, Cheon J, Zink JI. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:10623–10625. doi: 10.1021/ja1022267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lu J, Choi E, Tamanoi F, Zink JI. Small. 2008;4:421–426. doi: 10.1002/smll.200700903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mal NK, Fujiwara M, Tanaka Y, Taguchi T, Matsukata M. Chem Mater. 2003;15:3385–3394. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lu J, Liong M, Zink JI, Tamanoi F. Small. 2007;3:1341–1346. doi: 10.1002/smll.200700005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zheng H, Huang Z, Che S. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:5038. doi: 10.1039/c2dt12347a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chouyyok W, Shin Y, Davidson J, Samuels W, La Fermina HN, Rutledge DR, Fryxell G, Sanvanich T, Yantasee W. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:6390–6395. doi: 10.1021/es101165c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Busche B, Wiacek R, Davidson J, Koonsiripaiboon V, Yantasee W, Addelman RS, Fryxell EG. Inorg Chem Commun. 2009;12:312–315. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Young RS. Cobalt in biology and biochemistry. Academic Press Inc; London: 1979. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Denkhaus E, Salnikow K. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002;42:35–56. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(01)00214-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mattson MP, Chan SL. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:1041–1043. doi: 10.1038/ncb1203-1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Orrenius S, Zhivotovsky B, Nicotera P. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2003;4:552–565. doi: 10.1038/nrm1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hofer AM, Brown EM. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2003;4:530–538. doi: 10.1038/nrm1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rizzuto R, Pinton P, Ferrari D, Chami M, Szabadkai G, Magalhães PJ, Virgilio FD, Pozzan T. Oncogene. 2003;22:8619–8627. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bernauer L, Walz D, Fallab S. Helv Chim Acta. 1958;41:2094–2099. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schwarzenbach G, Anderegg G, Schneider W, Senn H. Helv Chim Acta. 1955;38:1147. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Irving H, Mellor DH. J Chem Soc. 1962:5222–5237. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Angelos S, Liong M, Choi E, Zink JI. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2008;137:4–13. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hiemstra T, de Wit JCM, van Riemsdijk WH. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1989;133:105–117. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li Z, Nyalosaso LJ, Hwang AA, Ferris PD, Yang S, Derrien G, Charnay C, Durand JO, Zink JI. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:19496–19506. doi: 10.1021/jp2047147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.