Skip to main content
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery logoLink to Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
. 2013 Jul-Sep;6(3):173–174.

Authors’ Reply

Hassan Ravari 1, Mohammad-Hadi Saeed Modaghegh 1, Gholam Hosein Kazemzadeh 1, Hamed Ghoddusi Johari 1, Yaser Rajabnejad 1
PMCID: PMC3800301  PMID: 24163543

Sir,

We appreciate Viroj Wiwanitkit's[1] comments on our article: “Comparison of vacuum-asisted closure (VAC) and moist wound dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers”.[2] They have mentioned that although VAC can be useful for diabetic foot care, its complications such as retention of polyurethane foam should be kept in mind.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or VAC therapy is a closed-loop, non invasive active system, characterised by a controlled and localised negative pressure applied on porous polyurethane absorbent foams. It promotes healing of acute and chronic wounds.[3]

Every therapeutic modality has its own advantages and disadvantages. For example, in NPWT, small fragments of foam can be left in the wound and delay the wound healing. This is a very rare complication and there are many randomised clinical trials which show that NPWT is a safe and effective treatment modality for different acute or chronic ulcers with different etiologies.[4,5] So, there is no doubt that only qualified medical/paramedical personnel should use it to avoid possible complications that can occur after an improper application.[3]

In conclusion, we believe that using VAC by a trained and expert medical team is a very safe and effective therapeutic option for diabetic foot ulcers in well selected patients.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wiwanitkit V. Vacuum-assisted closure and moist wound dressing in diabetic foot. J Cutan Aesth Surg. 2013;6:173. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.118436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ravari H, Modaghegh MH, Kazemzadeh GH, Johari HG, Vatanchi AM, Sangaki A, et al. Comparision of vacuum-asisted closure and moist wound dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013;6:17–20. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.110091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dessy LA, Serratore F, Corrias F, Parisi P, Mazzocchi M, Carlesimo B. Retention of polyurethane foam fragments during VAC therapy: A complication to be considered. Int Wound J. 2013 doi: 10.1111/iwj.12062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vikatmaa P, Juutilainen V, Kuukasjärvi P, Malmivaara A. Negative pressure wound therapy: A systematic review on effectiveness and safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:438–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blume PA, Walters J, Payne W, Ayala J, Lantis J. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:631–6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Scientific Scholar

RESOURCES