Skip to main content
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1974 Feb;27(2):340–345. doi: 10.1128/am.27.2.340-345.1974

Comparative Analysis of Modeling Techniques for Coliform Organisms in Streams

Jerome L Mahloch 1
PMCID: PMC380032  PMID: 4595960

Abstract

The use of models for predicting changes in water quality parameters is currently considered an integral part of river basin management. The application of modeling techniques to coliform organisms is in its infancy due to the complexities involved and the lack of definitive information on coliform populations in natural environments. The purpose of this study was to make a comparative analysis of the available models for coliform organisms in order to improve on the state of the art of this subject. The available coliform models may be classified into deterministic or statistical types. In this study, six different models, three of each type, were selected for analysis and were applied to coliform data available on the Leaf River. Results of comparing the models indicated that a deterministic model was best suited for total coliform and a statistical model was best suited for fecal coliform. Ultimate selection of a model for coliform organisms is dependent not only on the accuracy of the model but on ease of implementation. Current technology would probably dictate the use of a deterministic model because of the lack of a complete data base on which to base statistical models.

Full text

PDF
340

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams J. C. Unusual organism which gives a positive elevated temperature test for fecal coliforms. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Jan;23(1):172–173. doi: 10.1128/am.23.1.172-173.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brasfeild H. Environmental factors correlated with size of bacterial populations in a polluted stream. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Sep;24(3):349–352. doi: 10.1128/am.24.3.349-352.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Canale R. P., Patterson R. L., Gannon J. J., Powers W. F. Water quality models for total coliform. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1973 Feb;45(2):325–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cherry W. B., Hanks J. B., Thomason B. M., Murlin A. M., Biddle J. W., Croom J. M. Salmonellae as an index of pollution of surface waters. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Sep;24(3):334–340. doi: 10.1128/am.24.3.334-340.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hendricks C. W. Enteric bacterial growth rates in river water. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Aug;24(2):168–174. doi: 10.1128/am.24.2.168-174.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McFeters G. A., Stuart D. G. Survival of coliform bacteria in natural waters: field and laboratory studies with membrane-filter chambers. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Nov;24(5):805–811. doi: 10.1128/am.24.5.805-811.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES