Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1974 Apr;27(4):706–712. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.706-712.1974

Mathematical Estimation of the Level of Microbial Contamination on Spacecraft Surfaces by Volumetric Air Sampling

G S Oxborrow 1,2, A L Roark 1,2,1, N D Fields 1,2, J R Puleo 1,2
PMCID: PMC380122  PMID: 4151118

Abstract

Microbiological sampling methods presently used for enumeration of microorganisms on spacecraft surfaces require contact with easily damaged components. Estimation of viable particles on surfaces using air sampling methods in conjunction with a mathematical model would be desirable. Parameters necessary for the mathematical model are the effect of angled surfaces on viable particle collection and the number of viable cells per viable particle. Deposition of viable particles on angled surfaces closely followed a cosine function, and the number of viable cells per viable particle was consistent with a Poisson distribution. Other parameters considered by the mathematical model included deposition rate and fractional removal per unit time. A close nonlinear correlation between volumetric air sampling and airborne fallout on surfaces was established with all fallout data points falling within the 95% confidence limits as determined by the mathematical model.

Full text

PDF
706

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angelotti R., Wilson J. L., Litsky W., Walter W. G. Comparative evaluation of the cotton swab and Rodac methods for the recovery of Bacillus subtilis spore contamination from stainless steel surfaces. Health Lab Sci. 1964 Oct;1(4):289–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Favero M. S., Puleo J. R., Marshall J. H., Oxborrow G. S. Comparison of microbial contamination levels among hospital operating rooms and industrial clean rooms. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Mar;16(3):480–486. doi: 10.1128/am.16.3.480-486.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Petersen N. J., Bond W. W. Microbiological evaluation of the vacuum probe surface sampler. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Dec;18(6):1002–1006. doi: 10.1128/am.18.6.1002-1006.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pryor A. K., Vesley D., Shaffer J. G., Walter W. G. Cooperative microbial surveys of surfaces in hospital patient rooms. Health Lab Sci. 1967 Jul;4(3):153–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Puleo J. R., Favero M. S., Petersen N. J. Use of ultrasonic energy in assessing microbial contamination on surfaces. Appl Microbiol. 1967 Nov;15(6):1345–1351. doi: 10.1128/am.15.6.1345-1351.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Puleo J. R., Favero M. S., Tritz G. J. Feasibility of using ultrasonics for removing viable microorganisms from surfaces. Contam Control. 1967 Apr;6(4):58–passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roark A. L. A stochastic bioburden model for spacecraft sterilization. Space Life Sci. 1972 Jun;3(3):239–253. doi: 10.1007/BF00928169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Whitfield W. J., Beakley J. W., Dugan V. L., Hughes L. W., Morris M. E., McDade J. J. Vacuum probe: new approach to the microbiological sampling of surfaces. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Jan;17(1):164–168. doi: 10.1128/am.17.1.164-168.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES