1.0 Introduction
Rab25 (Rab11c, Catx8) identified by Goldenring et al., in 19931 as a member of the Rab family of GTPases, shares 63% homology with the ubiquitous Rab11a. Rab25 contains a different GTP-binding sequence, WDTAGLE, compared to other Rab members, making it a constitutively active Rab GTPase, although this remains to be confirmed biochemically. At the cellular level, Rab25 function is thought to mirror that of Rab11a. Both of them are spatially and functionally associated with apical recycling and transcytosis pathways in polarized epithelial cells2,3. Loss of cell polarity being an essential hallmark of cancer implicates Rab25 related trafficking and its impact on epithelial cell polarity program4,5 in cancer progression.
Till date about the seventy existing publications on Rab25 build our understanding regarding the localization, trafficking and other functions of this epithelial specific GTPase. Most importantly, by uncovering the role of Rab25 in solid tumors, we are beginning to understand how abnormal vesicular trafficking impacts cancer progression. Recently, several reviews were published updating the role of Rab25 and vesicular trafficking in cancer6–9. More recently, global interest in Rab25 surged due to repeated appearance of Rab25 in multiple cancer screens across diverse studies in different parts of the world.
Here we are summarizing the past and more recent literature on Rab25 and its role in cancer, highlighting the mechanical insights that we have gained in the last few years.
2.0 Context dependent role of Rab25 in Cancer: Oncogene or Tumor Suppressor?
2.1 Rab25 as an Oncogene
The first reported association of Rab25 with epithelial cancers came from a study by He et al, where they characterized nine human GTPases showing variable gene expression in liver cancer. Rab25 was one of the six Rab proteins that were upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma10. However, the most exhaustive evidence for Rab25 as an oncogene came from a pioneering study by Cheng et al, from our lab where Rab25 was identified as the driver of the 1q22 amplicon, a region frequently amplified in ovarian cancers11,12. Rab25 was upregulated at DNA copy number, RNA and protein levels and associated with poor outcome in clinical studies. Overexpression of Rab25 in ovarian cancer cell lines increased quintessential hallmarks of cancer namely, anchorage independent growth, cell proliferation, and reduced apoptosis and anoikis, mostly in a PI3K dependent manner. Overall both in vitro and in vivo evidences showed that Rab25 contributed to aggressiveness of ovarian and breast cancers11,12. Subsequently, others reported similar findings in ovarian cancer models13, making Rab25, not only a key oncogene for ovarian cancers but also an important biomarker. Rab25 expression varied based on cellular lineage and facilitated differential diagnosis in cases presenting a highly heterogeneous disease14. Specifically, Rab25 gene was a part of a signature that was upregulated in primary peritoneal serous carcinoma but not in highly metastatic diffused peritoneal malignant mesothelioma15,16. The broad range of Rab25 expression in ovarian cancers was also detectable in bioinformatics analysis of copy number variation and DNA methylation across primary serous ovarian tumors samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas Project suggesting that Rab25 is a sensitive biomarker in addition to a potential therapeutic target for ovarian cancers17.
In another study, utilizing the fact that androgens are implicated in the etiology of ovarian cancer, Sheach, et al., subjected androgen receptor expressing ovarian cancer cell lines to androgen treatment and tested for changes in global gene expression profiles. Surprisingly, Rab25 and Rab35 were the most prominent hits both at gene and protein level amongst the 121-upregulated genes panel.
Rab25 expression also correlated with histological grade in patients and emerged as an androgen responsive gene in ovarian cancer, identifying Rab25 as a clinical biomarker for AR function in ovarian cancers18.
2.2 Rab25 as a Tumor Suppressor
Unlike ovarian cancers, the role of Rab25 is far more ambiguous in breast, colon and intestinal carcinomas, although it still remains a major player in disease progression.
In a novel breast cancer cell line generated from human mammary epithelial cells by Rao's group (by transducing the Q61L mutant Ras in these cells and immortalizing with the catalytic subunit of telomerase), mutations in chromosome 1q22-23 locus resulted in the loss of Rab25, leading to oncogenic transformation. This was the first report of Rab25 as a tumor suppressor19. The same group followed up their earlier work by showing that Rab25 is lost in triple negative breast cancer, represented by MDA MB231 cell line and introduction of Rab25 in these cells partially reverses oncogenic progression20. In their model, ectopic Rab25, in addition to enhancing apoptosis, also suppressed angiogenesis and invasion by regulating VEGF-A and VEGFR1 expression20. However, this observation is contradictory to what our lab has observed in various broad spectrum analysis of breast cancer patients expression profiles as well as in cell lines where Rab25 is up regulated and is associated increased tumorigenicity and poor clinical outcome11,12. Recently, increased levels of Rab25mRNA (real-time PCR) and protein (immunohistochemistry) were reported in tissues from invasive ductal carcinoma patients with lymphatic metastasis compared to those without lymph metastasis21, again implicating Rab25 as an oncogene in breast cancer.
It is important to note that breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, populated by diverse cells types22,23. Each molecular subtype has distinct gene expression profiles and overall outcome. Reconciling the conflicting evidence, it can be speculated that Rab25 is associated with specific cell lineage in breast cancer. Our unpublished data also strongly supports the notion that Rab25 is indeed an oncogene in hormone receptor positive, luminal B subtype of breast cancers whereas in subsets of basal subtypes (lacking hormone receptors) Rab25 is mostly lost, possibly playing a tumor suppressive role. In fact recently, patient data from the cancer genome atlas project (TCGA) presented the differential methylation status of Rab25 between luminal and basal subtypes of breast cancer with significant increase in methylation in the latter group (unpublished). Furthermore, with the reevaluation of molecular features of intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer and emergence of the new “claudin low” group within the basal category (exemplified by the MDA MB231 cell line), we find that Rab25 levels are concomitantly undetectable along with low claudin levels in these mesenchymal breast cancer subtypes, clinically closest to metaplastic breast cancers22,23. So it is safe to conclude that in breast cancers, the oncogenic role of Rab25 is context dependent. In fact Yin et al, provide evidence that the level of Rab25 is significantly higher in ER/PR+ve patient samples than the ER/PR−ve ones, although the correlation of Rab25 with lymph metastasis holds true in both cases21.
Interestingly, probing further into the molecular heterogeneity of breast cancers, Leth-Larsen et al, performed an elegant study segregating the tumor initiating cells from the CD44+ high population in triple negative breast cancer cell lines. Many of the triple negative cell lines are composed at least two distinct phenotypic cell lineages. They found that the CD44 high population was a mixture of mesenchymal/basal B type cells and epithelial or luminal/basal A type cells. Unexpectedly they found that the CD44 high/CD24 low -luminal/basal A type retained stem cell like tumor initiating, mammosphere forming and chemo-resistant properties, instead of the mesenchymal subpopulation. In their study, Rab25 along with Muc1 and few other candidate genes were positively correlated with tumor initiating features and could potentially be utilized to predict distant metastasis in these estrogen receptor negative tumors24.
Our lab is currently studying the context dependent role of Rab25 in luminal vs. basal subtypes to gain mechanistic insights how this trafficking protein serves both as tumor suppressor and tumor promoter. This dichotomy was addressed by Tang8, and earlier by Mills et al.7, offering insightful explanations. Ongoing work in our lab supports that the interaction of Rab25 with its effector, Rab Coupling Protein (RCP or Rab11Fip1), which itself is a potent oncogene driving the 8p11–12 amplicon, with high frequency of amplification in breast cancer25, is of critical importance in understanding the clinical role of Rab25 in breast cancer.
In another instance of ambiguity, Rab25 previously reported to be present in colon carcinoma cell lines1 was then shown to be lost in human colonic neoplasia26,27 as well as in intestinal neoplasia in mice and humans27 in two recent works. Colorectal adenocarcinomas with low Rab25 correlated with shorter patient survival. Since Rab25 is essential for polarized trafficking to cell surface, the authors suggest that loss of Rab25 alters cell polarity and induces transformation.
Thus, based on the cases mentioned above, it is imperative for us to evaluate the role of Rab25 in case specific manner rather than view it as a global oncogene or a tumor suppressor. Instead of using Rab25 alone as a biomarker, it will be invaluable to generate a Rab25 signature with more powerful prognostic and predictive value.
2.3 Frequent appearance of Rab25 in various cancer screening studies
As highlighted in the previous section, the role of Rab25 has been studied in greater detail in a handful of cancers gaining significant mechanistic insights. However, Rab25 is gaining global prominence, as it is repeatedly features in gene signatures of a wide variety of cancers. However, these studies did not analyze the functional role of Rab25 in the respective diseases but they do open up the opportunity for groups focusing on Rab GTPases to gain more insights into the role of trafficking in various cancers.
In Wilm's tumors, gain in the 1q22 region housing Rab25 segregated histologically favorable tumors that eventually relapsed from those that remained relapse free. RT-PCT validation of a recurring region of 1q, namely 1q22-q23.1, identified 5 candidate genes including Rab2528.
Another group studying frequent amplification and overexpression of PPMD1 (protein phosphatase magnesium D-delta 1) in cancers with poor prognosis, measured global gene expression changes in several ER+ve breast cancer cell lines with RNAi mediated down-regulation of PPMD. Rab25 was noted in the shortlisted genes with maximum differential expression29,30, supporting its key regulatory role in ER+ve breast cancers.
One group assayed the role of TIMP1 in tumor progression using triple negative MDAMB231 cells overexpressing TIMP131. TIMP1, known to inhibit matrix metalloproteases-induced invasion, is often upregulated in breast cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. The authors testing the effect of TIMP1 overexpression both in vitro and in vivo found different sets of gene networks altered under each setting. Notably, Rab25 featured only in the in vivo xenograft panel comparing control vs. over expressing cells31. Questions such as, if TIMP1 is a regulator of Rab25 transcription and/or protein expression arise form this study. Since MDAMB231 cell line itself comprises of heterogeneous cell populations, it raises the question if TIMP1 is affecting the epithelial/basal A cell population or other populations.
Considering that Rab25 is reportedly a tumor suppressor in MDAMB231 cells, TIMP1 could be changing the context dependent function of Rab25. Further studies are essential to explain how Rab25 levels are manipulated by TIMP1 in a cell line that has very low endogenous levels of Rab25.
In endometrial cancers, Kruppel-like factor 9(KLF9), which transcriptionally regulates uterine cell proliferation, differentiation and adhesion during pregnancy, is deregulated. Suppression of KLF9 in a endometrial cancer cell line induced a gene network comprising of 24 genes with wide functional diversity including those involved in aldehyde metabolism, cell motility, cell signaling as well transcription regulation. Once again, Rab25 emerged a prominent part of this signature, implicating it in endometrial cancer progression32.
Lung cancer is another instance of a clinically heterogeneous disease with at least 4 histopathological subtypes. Molecular stratification of this subtypes using principal component analysis of DNA microarrays and RT PCR data from 12 representative lung cancer lines identified 12 genes including Rab25 and CDH-133, underscoring association of Rab25 with cell lineage and possibly polarization status.
Multiple studies so far including those conducted in our laboratory imply an association of Rab25 with cell lineage and differentiation state. Although not much is known about Rab25 in context of stem cells or cancer stem cells, a recent study encourages a closer look. In order to improve stem cell therapy, it is essential to identify tumorigenic genes within induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) that could lead to the feared oncogenic onslaught. Recently, a group utilizing bioinformatics analysis of a compilation of all available datasets on iPSCs and 11 differentiated cells lines identified a consensus gene list with over 500 genes, half of which were found in cancer tissues and cell lines. They found five of these genes to be overexpressed in iPSCs34. Interestingly, only Rab25 was found in the iPSC differentiated cells, opening a huge opportunity to study the role of Rab25 in stem cell and differentiation, which would have a deep impact in our understanding its complex role in cancers, especially in breast cancer.
3.0 Mechanistic insights into the cellular function of Rab25 and its regulation
One of the most powerful oncogenic effects of Rab25 is driving metastatic progression following loss of cell polarity. Rab25 is implicated in cancer cell migration and invasion in multiple studies published from our lab and others11, 35. The remarkable work of Jim Norman and his group pioneered our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of Rab25, especially how its affects metastasis. First in a seminal piece of work they showed a direct interaction between cytoplasmic end of beta1 integrin and Rab25, promoting cell migration, involving long pseudopodia in a 3D matrix. Basically, Rab25 decorated vesicles transport alpha5-beta1 integrins to the plasma membrane at the pseudopodia tip during fibronectin stimulated cell migration and simultaneously maintain a readily available pool of the same at cell front36.
A potential link between integrin recycling by Rab25 and the differential expression of Rab25 in TIMP1 overexpressing breast cancer cells growing as xenografts, as reported in the previous section31 remains to be tested, but may provide important clues to Rab25 function in triple negative breast cancer.
Although Rab25 and Rab11 were originally identified in apical recycling compartment and thought to be associated with long loop recycling (as opposed to short loop recycling via Rab4) a recent study using Hela cells and MDA MB231 cells, found that ectopic Rab25 acts predominantly in the short distance rapid recycling within cellular tips while Rab11 propelled a rear to front long distance transport in migrating cells35. This study also noted that overexpression of Rab25 and Rab11 increased the overall speed of cell migration35.
Another fascinating discovery from Norman's lab further elucidated Rab25 mediated integrin trafficking. Using photo-activation and biochemical approaches the group showed that Rab25 rescues lysosomally targeted integrins from degradation by transporting them back to the plasma membrane37. The molecule that collaborates with Rab25 in achieving this retrograde transport is CLIC3, which, not surprisingly, is upregulated in Rab25 expressing cells37. CLIC3, itself is an independent marker of lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in pancreatic cancers, suggesting that Rab25 and its effectors create potent oncogenic network by deregulating vesicular trafficking of key signaling molecules that increases the aggressiveness of these cancers.
There is also an argument that Rab25 associated invasive phenotype is not caused only by actin based cytoskeletal changes, but also profoundly impacts microtubules, as observed during Rab25 induced transformation of rat intestinal epithelial cells38.
The literature so far shows direct or indirect involvement of Rab25 in virtually all the classic hallmarks of cancer proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg, including proliferation, survival, evading apoptotic signals, angiogenesis, invasion and migration39. In the last few years the field of oncology developed renewed interest in cancer cell metabolism reviving Otto Warburg's findings that cancer cells prefer aerobic glycolysis. In fact the increased glucose uptake of cancer cells facilitated the development of develop 18F-FD glucose PET as a standard diagnostic tool in various solid tumors40,41, enlisting altered metabolism as a new hallmark of cancer42.
Recently, our laboratory showed for the very first time, the profound effect of Rab25 on cellular energetics. This is of immense importance because rapidly growing tumors frequently undergo metabolic stress arising from limited growth factors, nutrients and oxygen. The intercellular trafficking system is geared to rewire circulation of cellular resources to allow stressed cancer cells to survive. By conserving reserves, recycling glucose transporters and growth factors rather than degrading them, endosomal trafficking imparts a huge survival advantage. Rab25, as we showed our recent work, regulates cellular bioenergetics and autophagy 43in cancer cells undergoing stress. It does so by activating AKT, leading to increased glucose uptake. Unexpectedly, Rab25 also facilitates accumulation of glycogen, an additional energy reserve for cells. We found that Rab25 overexpressing ovarian cells maintained higher levels of basal cellular ATP under metabolic stress conditions, once again protecting them from energy catastrophe that would otherwise trigger apoptosis. Importantly, a wide array of bioenergetic targets were enriched in `Rab25-dependent' patient profiles and this combined signature significantly improved identification of patients with poor prognosis14. Moreover, recently another group also showed that loss of Rab25 in ovarian cancer cells inhibit cell proliferation and induce autophagy14 suggesting a pivotal role for Rab25 in cellular energetics.
The big question remains how a gene like Rab25 with many critical pleotropic effects is regulated. Till date there is little understanding of it. But a recent breakthrough by Xue et al., lays the foundation for future structural studies44. By characterizing the human Rab25 promoter the authors found a CRE binding CREB that binds to the Rab25 core promoter region and activates it. They also found that certain PKA activators could induce phosphorylation of the CREB by exposing the CRE. CREB phosphorylation recruits cofactors and further opens up chromatic configuration, strengthening promoter activity and Rab25 expression44.
4.0 Conclusions
Rab25 is a relatively new entrant in the field of Rab GTPases and we are only beginning to understand its role in disease progression, its various trafficking routes, the cargo it carries, its effectors and interactions and how it is regulated. So far its role as an oncogene is most convincing in ovarian cancers. Therefore its value as a clinical biomarker is also associated best with ovarian cancers45. In case of breast cancers, Rab25 function is highly context dependent. We believe this is also true for colon and intestinal carcinomas and other cancers with heterogeneous lineage. What will greatly benefit the field is identification of Rab25 `interactomes' in different cancers and also within specific subtypes in each cancer.
Lastly, development of a robust Rab25 activity assay is absolutely essential to improve functional studies involving is important trafficking protein.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Ms. Alexis Eschete, currently a student at Louisiana Tech University, Louisiana for helping us compile the literature on Rab 25 during her training at MD Anderson as a summer student.
Funding sources include Cancer Center Support Grant P20CA16672, PO1CA099031 to GBM and Susan G Komen Postdoctoral Fellowship to SM.
References
- 1.Goldenring JR, Shen KR, Vaughan HD, Modlin IM. Identification of a small GTP-binding protein, Rab25, expressed in the gastrointestinal mucosa, kidney, and lung. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:18419–18422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calhoun BC, Goldenring JR. Two Rab proteins, vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP-2) and secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs), are present on immunoisolated parietal cell tubulovesicles. Biochem J. 1997;325(Pt 2):559–564. doi: 10.1042/bj3250559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Casanova JE, et al. Association of Rab25 and Rab11a with the apical recycling system of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:47–61. doi: 10.1091/mbc.10.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang X, Kumar R, Navarre J, Casanova JE, Goldenring JR. Regulation of vesicle trafficking in madin-darby canine kidney cells by Rab11a and Rab25. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:29138–29146. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004410200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goldenring JR, Aron LM, Lapierre LA, Navarre J, Casanova JE. Expression and properties of Rab25 in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Methods Enzymol. 2001;329:225–234. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(01)29082-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Agarwal R, Jurisica I, Mills GB, Cheng KW. The emerging role of the RAB25 small GTPase in cancer. Traffic. 2009;10:1561–1568. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00969.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mills GB, Jurisica I, Yarden Y, Norman JC. Genomic amplicons target vesicle recycling in breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2123–2127. doi: 10.1172/JCI40256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tang BL. Is Rab25 a tumor promoter or suppressor--context dependency on RCP status? Tumour Biol. 2010;31:359–361. doi: 10.1007/s13277-010-0030-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mitra S, Cheng KW, Mills GB. Rab GTPases implicated in inherited and acquired disorders. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2011;22:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.He H, et al. Identification and characterization of nine novel human small GTPases showing variable expressions in liver cancer tissues. Gene Expr. 2002;10:231–242. doi: 10.3727/000000002783992406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cheng KW, et al. The RAB25 small GTPase determines aggressiveness of ovarian and breast cancers. Nat Med. 2004;10:1251–1256. doi: 10.1038/nm1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheng KW, Lu Y, Mills GB. Assay of Rab25 function in ovarian and breast cancers. Methods Enzymol. 2005;403:202–215. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)03017-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fan Y, Xin XY, Chen BL, Ma X. Knockdown of RAB25 expression by RNAi inhibits growth of human epithelial ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Pathology. 2006;38:561–567. doi: 10.1080/00313020601024037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu Y, et al. Knockdown of RAB25 promotes autophagy and inhibits cell growth in ovarian cancer cells. Mol Med Report. 2012;6:1006–1012. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2012.1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Davidson B, et al. Gene expression signatures differentiate ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma from diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5944–5950. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brusegard K, et al. Rab25 is overexpressed in Mullerian serous carcinoma compared to malignant mesothelioma. Virchows Arch. 2012;460:193–202. doi: 10.1007/s00428-011-1191-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wrzeszczynski KO, et al. Identification of tumor suppressors and oncogenes from genomic and epigenetic features in ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sheach LA, et al. Androgen-related expression of G-proteins in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:498–503. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cheng JM, Ding M, Aribi A, Shah P, Rao K. Loss of RAB25 expression in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2957–2964. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheng JM, et al. Tumor suppressor function of Rab25 in triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:2799–2812. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yin YX, et al. Increased expression of Rab25 in breast cancer correlates with lymphatic metastasis. Tumour Biol. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0412-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kamel D, Brady B, Tabchy A, Mills GB, Hennessy B. Proteomic Classification of Breast Cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2012 doi: 10.2174/138945012803530080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Prat A, Perou CM. Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2011;5:5–23. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2010.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leth-Larsen R, et al. Functional heterogeneity within the CD44 high human breast cancer stem cell-like compartment reveals a gene signature predictive of distant metastasis. Mol Med. 2012 doi: 10.2119/molmed.2012.00091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang J, et al. RCP is a human breast cancer-promoting gene with Ras-activating function. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2171–2183. doi: 10.1172/JCI37622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goldenring JR, Nam KT. Rab25 as a tumour suppressor in colon carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:33–36. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nam KT, et al. Loss of Rab25 promotes the development of intestinal neoplasia in mice and is associated with human colorectal adenocarcinomas. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:840–849. doi: 10.1172/JCI40728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Natrajan R, et al. Array CGH profiling of favourable histology Wilms tumours reveals novel gains and losses associated with relapse. J Pathol. 2006;210:49–58. doi: 10.1002/path.2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parssinen J, Alarmo EL, Karhu R, Kallioniemi A. PPM1D silencing by RNA interference inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines with wild-type p53. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;182:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2007.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Parssinen J, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes after PPM1D silencing in breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2008;259:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bigelow RL, Williams BJ, Carroll JL, Daves LK, Cardelli JA. TIMP-1 overexpression promotes tumorigenesis of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and alters expression of a subset of cancer promoting genes in vivo distinct from those observed in vitro. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:31–44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0170-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Simmen FA, Su Y, Xiao R, Zeng Z, Simmen RC. The Kruppel-like factor 9 (KLF9) network in HEC-1-A endometrial carcinoma cells suggests the carcinogenic potential of dys-regulated KLF9 expression. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:41. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-6-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Watanabe T, et al. Comparison of lung cancer cell lines representing four histopathological subtypes with gene expression profiling using quantitative real-time PCR. Cancer Cell Int. 2010;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-10-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang G, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell consensus genes: implication for the risk of tumorigenesis and cancers in induced pluripotent stem cell therapy. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:955–964. doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kessler D, et al. The action of small GTPases Rab11 and Rab25 in vesicle trafficking during cell migration. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2012;29:647–656. doi: 10.1159/000295249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Caswell PT, et al. Rab25 associates with alpha5beta1 integrin to promote invasive migration in 3D microenvironments. Dev Cell. 2007;13:496–510. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dozynkiewicz MA, et al. Rab25 and CLIC3 collaborate to promote integrin recycling from late endosomes/lysosomes and drive cancer progression. Dev Cell. 2012;22:131–145. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lapierre LA, et al. Transformation of rat intestinal epithelial cells by overexpression of Rab25 is microtubule dependent. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2011;68:97–111. doi: 10.1002/cm.20497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tong SY, et al. Correlation between FDG uptake by PET/CT and the expressions of glucose transporter type 1 and hexokinase II in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:654–658. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31824864e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garcia Vicente, A.M., et al. 18F-FDG retention index and biologic prognostic parameters in breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:460–466. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31823926c9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cheng KW, et al. Rab25 increases cellular ATP and glycogen stores protecting cancer cells from bioenergetic stress. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4:125–141. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xue H, et al. A CRE that binds CREB and contributes to PKA-dependent regulation of the proximal promoter of human RAB25 gene. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43:348–357. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.No JH, Kim K, Park KH, Kim YB. Cell-free DNA Level as a Prognostic Biomarker for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:3467–3471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]