Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Mar 26;33(4):707–710. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.03.017

Wolframin gene H611R polymorphism: No direct association with suicidal behavior but possible link to mood disorders

Gil Zalsman a,b,*, Mark J Mann c, Yung-yu Huang b, Maria A Oquendo b, David A Brent d, Ainsley K Burke b, Steven P Ellis b, J John Mann b
PMCID: PMC3804895  NIHMSID: NIHMS511070  PMID: 19328217

Abstract

Wolframin gene polymorphisms, including the H611R polymorphism, are reportedly associated with mood disorders and psychiatric hospitalization, but there is disagreement about the association of this specific variant with suicidality and impulsive traits. This study tested the association of the H611R polymorphism with mood disorders, suicidal behavior, and aggressive–impulsive traits. Two hundred and one subjects with mood disorders and 113 healthy volunteers were genotyped for the H611R polymorphism and underwent structured interviews for diagnosis and clinical ratings. All were Caucasians. The H611R polymorphism was associated with mood disorders but not suicidal behavior, aggressive/impulsive traits or suicidality in first-degree relatives. The HR heterozygote genotype was more frequent in mood disorder (χ2=7.505; df=2; p=.023). If this finding will be replicated, the H611R polymorphism may be a possible marker for mood disorders in a psychiatric population, and not just in relatives of Wolfram syndrome probands.

Keywords: Depression, Genetics, Mood disorders, Polymorphism, Suicide, Wolfram syndrome

1. Introduction

Wolfram syndrome (WS), a rare autosomal recessive disorder, is caused by a mutation in the gene encoding wolframin (Inoue et al., 1998) on the short arm of chromosome 4 (4p16.1) (Polymeropoulos et al., 1994; Swift and Swift, 2000). Hundreds of sequence variations have been reported in the wolframin gene of which almost 200 appear to be mutations that cause the clinical WS in homozygotes and heterozygotes. Twenty-four mutations have been identified in the wolframin gene, most in exon 8 (Hardy et al., 1999), but dozens of variants in the coding region are benign (Cryns et al., 2003). In patients with WS who are homozygous or compound heterozygous for wolframin mutations, severe psychiatric symptoms were observed. First degree WS relatives had a high probability of carrying a single wolframin mutation and a statistically significant excess of psychiatric hospitalizations, suicidal behavior, completed suicides, and self-reports of mental illness, over spouse controls (Swift and Swift, 2005).

Sequeira et al. (2003) assessed the association of three common polymorphic variations of the wolframin gene (H611R, R456H and I333V) and found a higher frequency of the RR homozygotes but not heterozygotes of the H611R locus in suicide victims. RR genotype was also associated with higher impulsivity, higher novelty seeking and lower persistence (Sequeira et al., 2003). TheH611R variant (A1832G), located in exon 8, represents an A/G polymorphism at locus 611, resulting in an amino acid substitution (histidine to arginine) in the wolframin protein. This variant is not associated with WS mutation (Cryns et al., 2003) but may still predispose individuals to psychiatric disorders.

Two studies did not replicate the association of depression or suicidality with the H611R locus (Furlong et al., 1999; Serretti et al., 2003). Furlong et al. (1999) found an association of the A559T heterozygosity with mood disorders but not with the H611R variant in bipolar I, major depressive disorder and control subjects. Serretti et al. (2003), assessed loci H611R, H456R and A559T using a family-based approach with trios of bipolar and unipolar probands and found no association with mood disorders.

This study reexamined the hypothesis that the H611R variant is associated with suicidal behavior and extends the clinical phenotype by quantifying suicidal behavior and including ratings of lifetime severity of impulsive–aggressive traits, and current severity of hopelessness and mood disorders, in a sample of mood disorder subjects and healthy volunteers.

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

Subjects (N=201) were recruited from patients presenting to the research clinics of two university-affiliated psychiatric hospitals for evaluation and treatment of a mood disorder and their clinical and genetic data were used in few other studies on genetics of mood disorders and suicidal behavior. All subjects met DSM-IV criteria for a mood disorder. Healthy volunteers (N=113) were recruited through advertisements. Only Caucasian subjects of European origin were included to reduce ethnic variation and the degree of genetic stratification (Malhotra and Goldman, 1999). All subjects were physically healthy on medical evaluation, had no reported symptoms of WS and no known first-degree relatives with the disorder. Written informed consent was obtained and the study approved by the Institutional Review Board.

2.2. Clinical assessment

DSM-IV (APA, 1994) Axis-I and II diagnoses were based on the Structured Clinical Interview SCID-I (Spitzer et al., 1990) and SCID-II (First et al., 1996). Lifetime aggression was rated using the Brown– Goodwin Aggression Inventory (BG) (Brown and Goodwin, 1986), lifetime hostility using the Buss–Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI) (Buss and Durkee, 1957) and impulsivity using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) (Barratt, 1994). Depression was evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (Beck and Steer, 1987) and the 17 item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, (HAM-17) (Hamilton, 1960). Hopelessness was measured by the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) (Beck et al., 1985). Lifetime suicide attempt history was recorded on the Columbia Suicide History Form (Oquendo et al., 2003), which records all suicide attempts chronologically, including documentation of the method and degree of medical damage. Lethality of the most severe lifetime suicide attempt was scored with the Beck Medical Damage Scale (Beck et al., 1985). Scores range from 0 to 8 with a score ≥4 indicating that medical hospitalization was needed. Suicidal intent was measured by the Beck Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) (Beck et al.,1985). Family history of suicide and suicide attempts, and other psychiatric and medical disorders, were recorded. For healthy volunteers, any Axis-I diagnosis on the SCID-NP (non-patient version), suicide attempt and a history of a first-degree relative with a mood or psychotic disorder were exclusion criteria.

2.3. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The H611R polymorphism (dbSNP: 734312) was typed by PCR and HhaI restriction enzyme digestion, as described previously (Sequeira et al., 2003) with slight modification in reaction condition. Briefly, a PCR product of 139 bp was obtained using forward primer: 5′-GAGCTCACCAA-GATCGCAGT-3′) and reverse primer: 5′-ACACCAGGATGAGCTTGACC-3′). PCR was carried out in a 20 µl volume, containing 100 ng DNA, 40 ng of each primer, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin, 200 µM of each dNTP, 4% DMSO, 10 µg BSA and 0.8 U of Red Tag DNA Polymerase (Fisher Scientific). Samples were processed in a Robocycler (Stratagene) and 30 temperature cycles were carried out, consisting of 30 s at 95 °C, 40 s at 56 °C, and 40 s at 72 °C, followed by a final extension step of 72 °C for 4 min. The PCR fragments were digested overnight with HhaI restriction enzyme (NE BioLab, MA). The digested PCR products were separated on a 2.5% agarose gel. The assays were carried out blind to clinical status.

2.4. Statistical analysis

SPSS statistical software, edition 12.0 for Windows (2003) by SPSS Inc, Chicago IL was used. Pearson's χ2 analyses analyzed frequencies of genotypes in clinical subgroups. Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared continuous variables (e.g. rating scales, age) by categorical independent variables (e.g. genotypes, groups), using Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Power analysis was performed in order to evaluate the power of the sample to detect association to family history of suicidality and mood disorders in first-degree relatives. All tests were two-tailed. Data are reported as mean±S.D.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive

The mood disorder group (N=201) included 140 (69.7%) females. The mean age was 41.0±14.4 years, 39.4% were married and 42.1% had at least some college education. The primary diagnoses were: major depressive disorder with current major depressive episode (N=160, 79.6%) and bipolar disorder with depressed mood (N=41, 20.4%). Sixty-eight subjects (33.8%) had attempted suicide at least once. The median lethality score on the Medical Damage Scale for the most lethal attempt for each attempter was 3.0 (range 0–8). Ten subjects (14.9% of attempters) had a lethality score of 7, the highest score possible following a non-lethal attempt. The most frequent methods for suicide were sedative (64.5%) and non-sedative (14.1%) overdoses.

3.2. H611R polymorphism and mood disorders

No significant differences in genotype frequencies were found when comparing across diagnostic subgroups within the mood disorders (major depression or bipolar disorder). Genotype distribution in bipolar disorder was comparable to major depression (χ2=1.42; df=2; p=.49) (Table 1) and, therefore, subgroup diagnosis was not controlled for in the analyses.

Table 1.

Wolframin (H611R) genotype frequencies in mood disorders subjects and controls.

Phenotype Genotype N (%) Statistics



Group HH HR RR χ2 (df) p
Controls (N=113) 49 (43.4%) 47 (41.6%) 17 (15.0%) 7.50 (2) .023*
Mood disorders All (N=201) 58 (28.9%) 113 (56.2%) 30 (14.9%)
Bipolar disorder (N=41) 14 (34.1%) 23 (56.1%) 4 (9.8%) 1.42 (2) .491
Other mood disorders (N=160) 44 (27.5%) 90 (56.3%) 26 (16.3%)
Attempters (N=68) 17 (25.0%) 41 (60.3%) 10 (14.7%) 0.71 (2) .701
Non-attempters (N=132) 40 (30.3%) 72 (54.5%) 20 (15.2%)
*

p<.05.

The distribution of genotypes did not deviate from the Hardy– Weinberg equilibrium for the control subjects (χ2=1.03; df=1; p=.31), and the mood disorder group had an overrepresentation of heterozygotes (χ2=4.32, df=1, p=.04).

Frequencies of the genotypes differed between the mood disorder and control groups (χ2=7.505; df=2; p=.023) (Table 1). Inspection of the table suggests that the group difference in genotype is because the HR heterozygote genotype is more prevalent in the mood disorder group and the HH genotype less prevalent.

3.3. H611R polymorphism and suicidal behavior

There was no difference in genotype distribution in suicide attempters and non-attempters in the mood disorder group (χ2=0.71; df=2; p=.701) (Table 1). Using a median split, we divided the mood disorder subjects into three groups: non-attempters, low lethality attempters (lethality 0–3) and high lethality attempters (lethality 4 and above). There was no significant difference in genotype distribution between these three groups (χ2=4.0, df=4, p=.406).

3.4. H611R polymorphism and family history of suicidality and mood disorders

In the mood disorder subjects only (N=201) there was no association with having a first-degree relative with a history of major depression (χ2=2.88; df=2; p=0.237), bipolar disorder (χ2=1.40; df=2; p=0.496) or suicide attempt/completed suicide (χ2=1.40; df=2; p=0.4.95).

3.5. Wolframin H611R and clinical phenotype

To test the hypothesis that the wolframin polymorphism may be associated with severity of impulsive–aggressive traits, depression or hopelessness, clinical rating scales scores were compared across the three genotypic groups (HH/HR/RR) in the mood disorder subjects. No difference across genotype was found in impulsivity (F=0.17; df=173,2; p=0.843), lifetime aggression (F=2.11; df=173,2; p=0.123) or hostility (F=0.10; df=171,2; p=0.903).

There was also no significant difference across genotype in severity of depression and hopelessness (data not shown).

4. Discussion

4.1. H611R polymorphism and mood disorders

This study did not find evidence of an association of the wolframin H611R polymorphism with suicidal behavior or aggressive–impulsive traits in this sample; however, heterozygosity of the H611R polymorphism was associated with a diagnosis of mood disorders.

Swift et al. (1990), Swift and Swift, 2005 reported that psychiatric hospitalizations and suicides in WS subjects were overrepresented when compared with their spouses which supported the hypothesis that heterozygosity in the wolframin gene is a risk factor for psychiatric disorders (Swift et al., 1991). Heterozygote carriers of the specific markers of risk are not rare in the general population and represent about 1% of the USA population (Swift et al., 1998).

The psychiatric manifestations of WS are diverse (Swift and Swift, 2000). Each family may have a different haplotype, and a variety of clinical manifestations (Khanim et al., 2001; Serretti et al., 2003). Swift and Swift (2000) used the phenotype of psychiatric hospitalization and suicidal behavior to define affected status. Other features such as aggression and impulsivity appear late in the course of illness. Based on an odds ratio of approximately 26, Swift and Swift (2000) estimated that approximately 25% of all WS relatives hospitalized for depression and suicide attempts are WS heterozygotes. Our study is in non-wolfram families and the results suggest that this gene–mood disorder association extends to the general psychiatric hospital population. Furlong et al. (1999) found an association of mood disorders with another polymorphism of the gene (A559 T) but no association with the H611R variant (Furlong et al., 1999).

4.2. H611R polymorphism and suicidal behavior

We found no association of theH611R variant with suicidal behavior, suicide-related traits aggression/impulsiveness or family history of suicide in our sample. Thirty three other variants of wolframin, including 13 mutations associated with WS, were not associated with suicidality (Crawford et al., 2002). Sequeira et al. (2003) found that RR genotype was associated with suicidality, higher impulsivity and novelty seeking. They assessed suicide victims, who represent the most extreme phenotype of suicidal behavior. However, their findings were based on a relatively small sample (N=111 and a subgroup of N=31 respectively). We cannot rule out the possibility that our negative findings may be due to our examination of the less severe phenotype of suicide attempts. Nevertheless, when we compared the most lethal attempters (lethality rating ≥ 4), who more closely resemble the suicide completers (Beautrais, 2003a,b), to the lower lethality suicide attempters, we still found no association. Another potential explanation for the difference in results may be the ethnic difference between the two populations (French Canadians compared with American Caucasians of European origin).

4.3. H611R polymorphism and family history of suicidality and mood disorders

WS is hereditary and close relatives have higher rates of psychiatric morbidity (Swift and Swift, 2005). However, we did not find an association of the H611R polymorphism with a family history of mood disorder or suicide. Swift and Swift, 2005; Swift and Swift, 2000; Swift et al. (1990, 1991) studied blood relatives of WS patients, while our sample was recruited without connection to the syndrome. Perhaps different mutations in the gene are responsible for the mood disorder and for WS. In order to evaluate whether we had enough power to detect familial mood disorders, we assumed a population with the genotype frequencies and the same proportion of subjects with a family history of any mood disorder as in our sample, but with a moderate odds ratio (viz, 3) in favor of a higher rate of family history among the heterozygotes. Under this scenario, we used the χ2 test to assess whether there was a difference in the proportion of subjects having a positive family history in the HR group vs. the HH group. With a sample size the same as the present study (N=314), the power to detect such a difference at α level of .05, using χ2 test, was 87%, and therefore adequate. We conclude that the H611R variant is not associated with higher family history of mood disorders or suicidality in first-degree relatives of mood disorder subjects.

4.4. Limitations

All case-control association studies are prone to ethnic stratification bias (Malhotra and Goldman, 1999). We addressed this problem by using Caucasians of European origin only. Although the H611R polymorphism results in an amino acid substitution, it does not cause WS (Cryns et al., 2003).

The association between the heterozygous genotype and a disorder, while no evidence of association between the homozygote genotype and the phenotype was found, needs further exploration, though found before in some other association studies of rare syndromes with psychiatric phenotypes such as relatives of Smith–Lemi–Opitz syndrome carriers (e.g. Lalovic et al., 2004). The mechanism by which a mutation in the wolframin gene could cause psychiatric disorder is not clear. It may be connected to the function of wolframin, the protein product of this gene (Inoue et al., 1998), in the central nervous system. Diverse neuropathologies are reported to be associated with this mutation including seizures, mental retardation and both axonal loss and axonal degradation (Kinsley et al.,1995; Swift andSwift, 2000; Swift et al.,1990). The phenomenon of a single-gene mutation associated with the development of diverse psychiatric disorders over the lifetime course is already known. For example, Huntington's disease, an autosomal dominant single-mutation neuropsychiatric disorder, may be manifested as a variety of neuropsychological dysfunctions with variable expression. The corresponding protein, huntingtin, is thought to interact with cytoskeletal components (Liddel et al., 2003). Interestingly, that gene is mapped to 4p16.3, in close proximity to the wolframin gene (4p16.1).

5. Conclusions

In this study, heterozygosity of the H611R polymorphism was associated with a diagnosis of mood disorders but not with suicidality or impulsive–aggressive traits. Our study is in non-wolfram subjects and the results suggest that this gene–mood disorder association extends to the general psychiatric hospital population. We also concluded that the H611R variant is not associated with higher family history of mood disorders or suicidality in first-degree relatives of mood disorder subjects. Further research must determine whether a polymorphism in the wolframin gene can be associated with psychopathology independently of WS, and, if so, whether it is involved in the actual pathophysiology.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by PHS grants MH62185, MH05390 and MH048514.

The authors thank Nancy Geibel and Micky Gerchak for editing the manuscript.

Abbreviations

BDHI

Buss–Durkee Hostility Inventory

BDI

Beck Depression Inventory

BG

Brown–Goodwin Aggression Inventory

BHS

Beck Hopelessness Scale

BIS

Barratt Impulsiveness Scale

HAM-17

17 item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

SIS

Beck Suicide Intent Scale

WS

Wolfram syndrome

Footnotes

Address where the work was done and mailing address for the other authors: Division of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 42, New York, NY, USA 10032, USA.

References

  1. APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) Washington D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barratt ES. Impulsiveness and aggression. In: Monahan J, Steadman HJ, editors. Violence and mental disorder: development in risk assessment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994. pp. 61–79. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beautrais AL. Subsequent mortality in medically serious suicide attempts: a 5 year follow-up. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003a;37:595–599. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beautrais AL. Suicide and serious suicide attempts in youth: a multiple-group comparison study. Am J Psychiatr. 2003b;160:1093–1099. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck Depression Inventory—manual. Psychological corporation. 1987 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beck AT, Steer RA, Kovacs M, Garrison B. Hopelessness and eventual suicide: a 10-year prospective study of patients hospitalized with suicidal ideation. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142:559–563. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.5.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown GL, Goodwin FK. Cerebrospinal fluid correlates of suicide attempts and aggression. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;487:175–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb27897.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buss AH, Durkee A. An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. J Consult Psychol. 1957;21:343–348. doi: 10.1037/h0046900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crawford J, Zielinski MA, Fisher LJ, Sutherland GR, Goldney RD. Is there a relationship between Wolfram syndrome carrier status and suicide? Am J Med Genet. 2002;114:343–346. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cryns K, Sivakumaran TA, Van den Ouweland JM, Pennings RJ, Cremers CW, Flothmann K, et al. Mutational spectrum of the WFS1 gene in Wolfram syndrome, nonsyndromic hearing impairment, diabetes mellitus, and psychiatric disease. Hum Mutat. 2003;22:275–287. doi: 10.1002/humu.10258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon RL, Wiliams M, Janet BW, Loma B. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), (Version 2.0) New York: Biometric Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  12. Furlong RA, Ho LW, Rubinsztein JS, Michael A, Walsh C, Paykel ES, et al. A rare coding variant within the wolframin gene in bipolar and unipolar affective disorder cases. Neurosci Lett. 1999;277:123–126. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00865-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hardy C, Khanim F, Torres R, Scott-Brown M, Seller A, Poulton J, et al. Clinical and molecular genetic analysis of 19Wolfram syndrome kindreds demonstrating a wide spectrum of mutations in WFS1. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:1279–1290. doi: 10.1086/302609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Inoue H, Tanizawa Y, Wasson J, Behn P, Kalidas K, Bernal-Mizrachi E, et al. A gene encoding a transmembrane protein is mutated in patients with diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy (Wolfram syndrome) Nat Genet. 1998;20:143–148. doi: 10.1038/2441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khanim F, Kirk J, Latif F, Barrett TG. WFS1/wolframin mutations, Wolfram syndrome, and associated diseases. Hum Mutat. 2001;17:357–367. doi: 10.1002/humu.1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kinsley BT, Swift M, Dumont RH, Swift RG. Morbidity and mortality in the Wolfram syndrome. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:1566–1570. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.12.1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lalovic A, Merkens L, Russell L, Arsenault-Lapierre G, Nowaczyk MJ, Porter FD, et al. Cholesterol metabolism and suicidality in Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome carriers. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:2123–2126. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.2123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liddel MB, Williams J, Owen MJ. The dementias. In: McGuffin P, Owen MJ, Gottesman II, editors. Psychiatric genetics and genomics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. pp. 368–371. [Google Scholar]
  20. Malhotra AK, Goldman D. Benefits and pitfalls encountered in psychiatric genetic association studies. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;45:544–550. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00365-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oquendo MA, Halberstam B, Mann JJ. Risk factors of suicidal behavior: the utility and limitations of research instruments. In: First MB, editor. Standardized evaluation in clinical practice. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2003. pp. 103–130. [Google Scholar]
  22. Polymeropoulos MH, Swift RG, Swift M. Linkage of the gene for Wolfram syndrome to markers on the short arm of chromosome 4. Nat Genet. 1994;8:95–97. doi: 10.1038/ng0994-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sequeira A, Kim C, Seguin M, Lesage A, Chawky N, Desautels A, et al. Wolfram syndrome and suicide: evidence for a role of WFS1 in suicidal and impulsive behavior. Am J Med Genet. 2003;119B:108–113. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.20011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Serretti A, Cusin C, Cristina S, Lorenzi C, Lilli R, Lattuada E, et al. Multicentre Italian family-based association study on tyrosine hydroxylase, catechol-O-methyl transferase andWolfram syndrome 1 polymorphisms in mood disorders. Psychiatr Genet. 2003;13:121–126. doi: 10.1097/01.ypg.0000056172.32550.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB. Instruction manual for the structured clinical interview for the DSM-IV (SCID-P) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  26. Swift M, Swift RG. Psychiatric disorders and mutations at theWolfram syndrome locus. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47:787–793. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00244-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Swift M, Swift RG. Wolframin mutations and hospitalization for psychiatric illness. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10:799–803. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Swift RG, Sadler DB, Swift M. Psychiatric findings in Wolfram syndrome homozygotes. Lancet. 1990;336:667–669. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92157-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Swift RG, Perkins DO, Chase CL, Sadler DB, Swift M. Psychiatric disorders in 36 families with Wolfram syndrome. Am J Psychiatr. 1991;148:775–779. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.6.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Swift RG, Polymeropoulos MH, Torres R, Swift M. Predisposition of Wolfram syndrome heterozygotes to psychiatric illness. Mol Psychiatry. 1998;3:86–91. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES