Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of expiratory resistance load on the tongue area encompassing the suprahyoid and genioglossus muscles. [Subjects] The subjects were 30 healthy individuals (15 males, 15 females, mean age: 28.9 years). [Methods] Magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate morphological changes in response to resistive expiratory pressure loading in the area encompassing the suprahyoid and genioglossus muscles. Images were taken when water pressure was sustained at 0%, 10%, 30%, and 50% of maximum resistive expiratory pressure. We then measured tongue area using image analysis software, and the morphological changes were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance followed by post hoc comparisons. [Results] A significant change in the tongue area was detected in both sexes upon loading. Multiple comparison analysis revealed further significant differences in tongue area as well as changes in tongue area in response to the different expiratory pressures. [Conclusion] The findings demonstrate that higher expiratory pressure facilitates greater reduction in tongue area.
Key words: Expiratory resistance load, Tongue area, Magnetic resonance imaging
INTRODUCTION
The known effects of expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) include improved respiratory muscle strength1,2,3,4), exercise tolerance5), and increased speech loudness6). Recent reports, that EMST can improve cough capacity3, 4, 7, 8) and swallowing function9,10,11,12,13), have drawn attention to this method as an effective means for stimulating the suprahyoid muscles, which play a role in swallowing, and thus as a preventive measure against aspiration pneumonia.
Wheeler et al.11) compared the activities of the suprahyoid muscles under positive expiratory pressure loading while swallowing saliva and water. They found that pressure loading resulted in a significantly longer duration of muscle activity and larger maximum and mean amplitudes11), suggesting that EMST improves the contraction characteristic and neuromodulatory mechanism of the suprahyoid muscles involved in swallowing. Furthermore, Pitts et al.9) and Troche et al.10) performed EMST studies of patients with Parkinson’s disease and reported improved cough capacity and higher penetration-aspiration scale scores. These results indicate that EMST affects swallowing function by directly stimulating the suprahyoid muscles. However, these findings were all based on surface electromyography (SEMG) studies, and because of the potential involvement of the genioglossus muscle in SEMG of the suprahyoid muscles14), many uncertainties about the beneficial effects of pressure loading remain. Therefore, we conducted a morphological study using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the influence of expiratory pressure on the area encompassing the suprahyoid and genioglossus muscles.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects
This study recruited employees at Health Insurance Naruto Hospital who had no known health problems and who provided informed consent to participation in the study. Thirty participants (15 males, age 31.4±4.2 years; 15 females, 26.5±4.8 years) were examined to determine the effects of pressure loading on tongue morphology (Table 1).
Table 1. Subject characteristics.
| Male (n=15) | Female (n=15) | |
| Age (years) | 31.4±4.2 | 26.5±4.8 |
| Height (cm) | 171.2±4.5 | 158.9±4.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.2±7.0 | 52.4±8.1 |
| Sitting MEP | 131.1±16.5 | 100.7±17.1 |
| Supine MEP | 122.8±16.5* | 89.4±15.1* |
MEP: Maximum expiratory pressure
Mean±SD. paired t-test; *: p<0.01, compared with sitting MEP for each sex
Methods
To determine the levels of expiratory pressure used during MRI, a Micro RPM respiratory pressure device (Micro Medical Ltd., United Kingdom) was used to measure the maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) of participants in the sitting position according to the method of Black and Hyatt15). Although respiratory muscle strength is generally measured in the sitting position, MEP measurements obtained in this position cannot be used to interpret MRI data taken in the supine position because respiratory muscle strength is affected by body position16). Therefore, we also measured MEP in the supine position. The threshold was set at 100% MEP in the supine position and experiments were performed at 10%, 30%, and 50% MEP. In addition, a water pressure-type device17) was used instead of the commonly used spring-type device because MRI generates a magnetic field that would affect the functionality of a spring-type device.
Unlike computed tomography (CT), MRI poses no risk of radiation exposure. Participants wore a head coil and were placed in the supine position during an MRI session performed using a Vantage XGV 1.5T MRI scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems Co., Tochigi, Japan) with a gradient echo sequence and other imaging parameters set according to How et al.18) (Fig. 1). Sagittal plane images were taken at rest and at 10%, 30%, and 50% MEP in random order (Table 2). The interval between scans was 3 min, and the tongue area was measured using Synapse® (FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The tongue area was defined as the area encompassing the suprahyoid and genioglossus muscles according to Stuck et al.19).
Fig. 1.

MRI images taken at rest (left) and at 50% MEP (right)
Table 2. Magnetic resonance imaging parameters.
| Parameter | Sagittal value |
| Repetition time (ms) | 5.8 |
| Echo time (ms) | 2.3 |
| Acquisition time (s) | 7.0 |
| Field of view (mm) | 250 |
SPSS Statistics version 17 was used for statistical analysis. Because MEP changes in response to different body positioning, MEP measured in the sitting and supine positions was compared between sexes using the paired t-test. Sex-specific morphological changes in response to expiratory loading were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc comparisons. A two-sample test was also performed to compare differences in tongue areas between the sexes. Results were considered significant at p<0.05.
This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of Health Insurance Naruto Hospital (approval number 1103) and was performed in accordance with ethical standards on human experimentation and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983.
RESULTS
In both sexes, MEP measured in the supine position was significantly lower than that in the sitting position (p<0.01, Table 1).
Significant changes in tongue area were detected in both sexes upon MEP loading (males, F(3,42)=133.00, p<0.01; female, F(3,42)=144.98, p<0.01), and multiple comparison analysis revealed further significant differences between the different expiratory pressures (p<0.01, Table 3). The reductions in area at 10%, 30%, and 50% MEP were 13.0%, 16.4%, and 18.7% in males and 16.2%, 18.6%, and 22.0% in females (Table 4), respectively, with statistical significance for each sex (males, F(2,28)=33.79, p<0.01; females, F(2,28)=41.3, p<0.01). Multiple comparison analysis revealed significant differences between all 4 conditions (p<0.01, Table 4), but not between sexes.
Table 3. Dimensional change (mm2) in tongue area at different expiratory pressures.
| Resting | 10% MEP | 30% MEP | 50% MEP | |
| Males | 3169.4±342.0 | 2761.7±378.9* | 2654.4±365.5*† | 2582.2±381.2 *†# |
| Females | 2687.6±291.1 | 2251.3±279.5* | 2189.9±294.6 *† | 2097.7±275.4 *†# |
Mean±SD. Bonferroni post hoc comparisons; *: p<0.01, compared with resting values. †: p<0.01, compared with values at 10% MEP. #: p<0.01, compared with values at 30% MEP
Table 4. Percent reduction in tongue area at different expiratory pressures.
| 10% MEP | 30% MEP | 50% MEP | |
| Males | 13.0±5.4 | 16.4±5.0* | 18.7±5.0*† |
| Females | 16.2±5.4 | 18.6±5.8* | 22.0±5.4*† |
Mean±SD. Bonferroni post hoc comparisons; *: p<0.01, compared with values at 10% MEP. †:p<0.01, compared with values at 30% MEP.
Two sample test: no significant differences were detected in the rate of changes in pressure loading in males or females.
DISCUSSION
Pressure loads in EMST have been suggested to improve swallowing function by stimulating the suprahyoid muscles. Such studies however have used SEMG to investigate the effect of EMST on muscle activity. Because the suprahyoid muscles is a collective name for the digastric, mylohyoid, stylohyoid, and geniohyoid muscles, the problem associated with SEMG measurements of the suprahyoid muscles is that the activities of other muscles such as the genioglossus muscle, a large muscle adjacent to the suprahyoid muscles, may be included in SEMG recordings14). For this reason, the actual effect of expiratory pressure loads on the genioglossus muscle must be clarified. However, SEMG detects muscle activity, not morphological changes in internal structures. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated morphological changes of the suprahyoid muscles or genioglossus muscle under pressure loading. Therefore, we used MRI to study the effect of pressure loading on the tongue from a morphological perspective. Because the boundary between the suprahyoid and genioglossus muscles (the target muscles of the present study) is not easily distinguished on MRI images19), we defined the area encompassing the two muscles as the tongue area according to Stuck et al.19).
In general, MEP measured in the sitting position is used as a threshold to determine other loading parameters. However, because MRI is conducted in the supine position, we compared MEP in both positions and found that MEP was significantly lower in the supine position than in the sitting position in both sexes. This is in agreement with the findings of Badr et al.16), who found that body position influences MEP. We therefore determined the experimental loading pressure on the basis of supine MEP.
ANOVA and multiple comparison analysis of the tongue area revealed significant differences between different pressures, demonstrating that the higher the pressure load, the greater the influence on the tongue area. As MEP increased from resting to 10% and 50%, the area was reduced by 13.0% and 18.7% in males and 16.2% and 22.0% in females, respectively, with no significant differences between the sexes. This suggests that tongue area decreases more with increasing pressure. Wheeler et al.11) reported that pressure loading stimulates suprahyoid muscle activity, and according to Fukuoka et al.13), such activity at 75% MEP was significantly higher than that at 25% MEP. Thus, it is likely that contraction of the suprahyoid muscles as well as of the genioglossus muscle leads to morphological changes in the tongue area.
Although a decline in swallowing function can be caused by various factors, a few cases have shown worsening of swallowing function as a result of muscle atrophy due to disuse. Therefore, repeated application of EMST may ensure adequate contraction of not only the respiratory muscles, but also the genioglossal and suprahyoid muscles, resulting in the prevention or improvement of dysphagia.
Lastly, because of the unclear boundary between the genioglossus muscle and suprahyoid muscles on MRI images, we could not determine the detailed morphological changes occurring in each muscle. In addition, only two-dimensional images taken in the sagittal plane were used in the present study. We therefore plan to investigate the effects of pressure loading on individual muscles and evaluate morphological changes using three-dimensional images in the future.
REFERENCES
- 1.Suzuki S, Sato M, Okubo T: Expiratory muscle training and sensation of respiratory effort during exercise in normal subjects. Thorax, 1995, 50: 366–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim J, Sapienza CM: Implications of expiratory muscle strength training for rehabilitation of the elderly: tutorial. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2005, 42: 211–224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sasaki M, Kurosawa H, Kohzuki M: Effects of inspiratory and expiratory muscle training in normal subjects. J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc, 2005, 8: 29–37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sasaki M: The effect of expiratory muscle training on pulmonary function in normal subjects. J Phys Ther Sci, 2007, 19: 197–203 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mota S, Güell R, Barreiro E, et al. : Clinical outcomes of expiratory muscle training in severe COPD patients. Respr Med, 2007, 101: 516–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sapienza CM, Davenport PW, Martin AD: Expiratory muscle training increases pressure support in high school band students. J Voice, 2002, 16: 495–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim J, Davenport P, Sapienza C: Effect of expiratory muscle strength training on elderly cough function. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2009, 48: 361–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gosselink R, Kovacs L, Ketelaer P, et al. : Respiratory muscle weakness and respiratory muscle training in severely disabled multiple sclerosis patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2000, 81: 747–751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pitts T, Bolser D, Rosenbek J, et al. : Impact of expiratory muscle strength training on voluntary cough and swallow function in parkinson disease. Chest, 2009, 135: 1301–1308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Trohe MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, et al. : Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology, 2010, 75: 1912–1919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wheeler KM, Chiara T, Sapienza CM: Surface electromyographic activity of the submental muscles during swallow and expiratory pressure threshold training tasks. Dysphagia, 2007, 22: 108–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wheeler-Hegland KM, Rosenbek JC, Sapienza CM: Submental SEMG and hyoid movement during mendelsohn maneuver, effortful swallow, and expiratory muscle strength training. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2008, 51: 1072–1087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fukuoka T, Sugita Y, Kawasaka N, et al. : Surface electromyographic analysis of expiratory muscle strength training used to strengthen suprahyoid muscles. Jpn J Dysphagia Rehabil, 2011, 15: 174–182 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huckabee ML, Butler SG, Barclay M, et al. : Submental surface electromyographic measurement and pharyngeal pressures during normal and effortful swallowing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 86: 2144–2149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Black LF, Hyatt RE: Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1969, 99: 696–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Badr C, Elkins MR, Ellis ER: The effect of body position on maximal expiratory pressure and flow. Aust J Physiother, 2002, 48: 95–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mestriner RG, Fernandes RO, Steffen LC, et al. : Optimum design parameters for a therapist-constructed positive-expiratory-pressure therapy bottle device. Respir Care, 2009, 54: 504–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.How SC, McConnell AK, Taylor BJ, et al. : Acute and chronic responses of the upper airway to inspiratory loading in healthy awake humans: an MRI study. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2007, 157: 270–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stuck BA, Köpke J, Maurer JT, et al. : Evaluating the upper airway with standardized magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope, 2002, 112: 552–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
