Skip to main content
Journal of Oral Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Oral Microbiology
. 2013 Oct 22;5:10.3402/jom.v5i0.21473. doi: 10.3402/jom.v5i0.21473

Differential transcription of virulence genes in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans serotypes

Josely Emiko Umeda 1, Priscila Larcher Longo 1, Maria Regina Lorenzetti Simionato 1, Marcia Pinto Alves Mayer 1,*
PMCID: PMC3807012  PMID: 24159369

Abstract

Background

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans serotypes are clearly associated with periodontitis or health, which suggests distinct strategies for survival within the host.

Objective

We investigated the transcription profile of virulence-associated genes in A. actinomycetemcomitans serotype b (JP2 and SUNY 465) strains associated with disease and serotype a (ATCC 29523) strain associated with health.

Design

Bacteria were co-cultured with immortalized gingival epithelial cells (OBA-9). The adhesion efficiency after 2 hours and the relative transcription of 13 genes were evaluated after 2 and 24 hours of interaction.

Results

All strains were able to adhere to OBA-9, and this contact induced transcription of pgA for polysaccharide biosynthesis in all tested strains. Genes encoding virulence factors as Omp29, Omp100, leukotoxin, and CagE (apoptotic protein) were more transcribed by serotype b strains than by serotype a. ltxA and omp29, encoding the leukotoxin and the highly antigenic Omp29, were induced in serotype b by interaction with epithelial cells. Factors related to colonization (aae, flp, apaH, and pgA) and cdtB were upregulated in serotype a strain after prolonged interaction with OBA-9.

Conclusion

Genes relevant for surface colonization and interaction with the immune system are regulated differently among the strains, which may help explaining their differences in association with disease.

Keywords: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, gene expression, epithelial cell, infection


The oral species Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans is a recognized periodontopathogen. Genome analysis revealed that this species is distributed in two major groups correlated with serotype-specific polysaccharide antigens: serotypes: a, d, e, and f, and serotypes b and c, which may help to explain their differences in virulence. About 2,000 genes were included as the core genes in this bacterium, whereas 16.7–29.4% of the genome belongs to the flexible gene pool (1).

Serotype b is frequently associated with aggressive periodontitis (2), and subjects harboring the serotype b JP2 clone are at a higher risk of developing aggressive periodontitis than those colonized by ‘non-JP2 clones’ strains (3). The main characteristic of the virulent clone is the expression of high levels of leukotoxin (4), but other genotypes within the serotype b have also been associated with aggressive periodontitis (5). Serotypes a and c are associated with health (2), although the latter may also be found in periodontitis-affected patients (6). Certain phenotypic and genotypic features have been associated with A. actinomycetemcomitans serotypes (7), but little is known on the expression of core genes and its effects on the virulence potential of different lineages.

A. actinomycetemcomitans expresses virulence factors, which promote adhesion to oral surfaces, suppress or inactivate the host immune response and induce inflammation and tissue destruction. The expression of fimbriae and polysaccharide mediates formation of dense biofilms (8, 9). Adhesins, such as Aae and Omp100, play a significant role in the interaction with gingival epithelial cells (10, 11), whereas the highly immunogenic outer membrane protein Omp29 (12) and the tetraphosphatase ApaH (13) are associated with invasion of non-phagocytic cells. Leukotoxin induces apoptosis not only in neutrophils and macrophages of humans and Old World primates (5) but also in endothelial cells (14). This organism's cytotoxic effects are also mediated by the cytolethal-distending toxin, which is involved in damage of the epithelial cells barrier (15) and in the interaction with the immune system (16, 17).

Since most virulence-associated genes are part of the core genome of A. actinomycetemcomitans, this study tested the hypothesis that differences in the virulence potential of A. actinomycetemcomitans strains may be partly due to differences in their transcription profile.

Material and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Reference strains ATCC 29523 (serotype a) and JP2 and SUNY 465 (serotypes b) were used. Strains were subcultured in Tryptic soy agar or broth supplemented with 0.6% of yeast extract (TSYE), at 37°C in 10% CO2. All strains exhibited the smooth phenotype when grown in agar plates, and were non-aggregative when grown in broth. The colonies of A. actinomycetemcomitans grown in TSYE agar were inoculated in TSBYE and incubated for 8 hours. The suspension was adjusted to an OD495 nm∼1, diluted 1:40 in the same broth, and incubated for 7 hours, corresponding to exponential growth phase/mid log. The cell density was adjusted to an OD495 nm∼0.2 corresponding to 3×108 CFU/ml.

Epithelial cell culture

Immortalized gingival epithelial cells (OBA-9) (12), gently given by Dr. Shinya Murakami (University of Osaka, Japan), were cultured in serum-free keratinocyte medium containing insulin, epidermal growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor (KSFM-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Adhesion assay

OBA-9 cells were inoculated in 24-well tissue culture plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) and incubated to reach a semiconfluent monolayer (∼3 x 105 cells/well) in KSFM. Prior to infection, the wells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.5, 0.8% NaCl). Overnight bacterial cultures were inoculated in TSYE broth to reach exponential growth phase/mid log, harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in antibiotic-free KSFM and inoculated in OBA-9 cells monolayers at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3,000:1 (bacteria: eukaryotic cell) (18). Plates were centrifuged at 593×g/10 min and incubated for 2 and 24 hours. Non-adherent bacterial cells were removed by washing with PBS. The remaining bacterial cells firmly attached to and/or invading the epithelial cells were evaluated for gene expression after interaction with epithelial cells. Controls consisted of bacterial suspensions in KSFM without the addition of OBA-9. The percentage of adherent bacterial cells after 2 hours incubation was determined after trypsin treatment of the co-cultures by CFU evaluation.

Gene transcription analysis

The co-cultures, after 2 hours (B) and 24 hours (D) of interaction, were washed with PBS for removal of non-adherent bacteria, and submitted to RNA extraction using Trizol (Invitrogen). Bacterial suspensions in KSFM incubated for 2 and 24 hours (A and C) were used as controls. After chloroform extraction, RNA was precipitated with isopropanol and washed with 70% ethanol. Genomic DNA was removed by DNase digestion. First-strand synthesis was performed with 1 µg of RNA, using the First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR with random hexamer primers (Super Script III, Gibco, Grand Island, NY). Transcription of 13 genes was evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), using the primers described in Table 1. Controls with no addition of RNA, addition of RNA and no addition of reverse transcriptase (used as control for the DNase treatment) were included, and their products were used as parallel control samples in qPCR.

Table 1.

Oligonucleotide primers used for RT-qPCR

Gene Nucleotide sequence (5’–3’) Product (pb) Reference
gapdh CCCAAAACATCATCCCATCTTCGGAACACGGAACGCCATAC 60 18
ltxA TTGTCGCAAGTGCCATAGTTATCCACTAGCCCCATGGCAACGGTAGAA 193 This study, 22
flp TCAAAGCAATCGAAGCAATCGCAATAGCGATCAAACCGTA 82 This study, 22
aae GGTTTTAGGCGGCACATTTATGCTTGACCAACCATAACCA 152 This study, 22
apaH CACCTTGGTTTGCCTTGGATATGTCTTCCCAACGTAGCATG 159 This study, 22
omp29 TCTCAACAAGCCATCTCTGCCGACCTTTAACTACGTCGCA 80 This study, 22
omp100 ATCTTCAAGCCAAAACATCAAGGCTGCCGACATTAT 169 11
cdtB CAACAACACAATTCCAACCCGGCGATACCTGTCCATTCTT 94 This study, 22
vapA CGAAATTATGGCTGGGTATGCAATGGTTGGATGTTGAATACGG 60 31, 22
orf 859 CAATCTCACCCAAGCCCTACGCGGCGGAAATATAGAAACTG 83 31
vppA GGTTACCGGTGGAGTTCGCGGGTCGTAATCGTTTGA 190 This study, 22
cagE TGGATTGGGACAAGTGAACATACAAAGCCATAAGAGAAAT 190 This study, 22
emaA CTGCAGCAACCGGGGATTATAATGGATTGGTTGCCTTTAG 110 This study, 22
pgA GACGGTGATGCGGTATTGGGACCGATGATGGAGCTGAA 160 9

The reaction consisted of 10 µl SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Biotools Inc., QuantiMix EASY SYG Kit, Madrid, Spain), 200 nM of each primer, 100 ng of cDNA, 3–4.5 mM MgCl2 in 20 µl of final volume. The housekeeping gene gapdH (orf1383) was used to normalize mRNA levels (18). Reactions were performed in iQ 5 Bio Rad thermocycler (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA) linked to software (IQ-5 Real Time PCR Detection System), in 48 cycles with 95°C/10 sec, 50°C/1 min (18) and 80–83°C for 6 sec.

Melting curve analysis was carried out with 10 sec of 100 repetitions by increasing the annealing temperature by 0.4°C per step from 55 to 95°C (18). All samples were examined in triplicate, with parallel control samples without cDNA, and internal controls of gapdH amplification in each experiment. Three independent RNA samples were analyzed. The relative expression of the studied genes was analyzed with REST2005 Beta V1.9.10 (19) (Corbett Life Science, Sydney, Australia), by using the following formula:

Mean ratio of gene expression=(Etarget)ΔCPtarget(mean control-mean sample)/(Eref)ΔCPref(mean control-mean sample)

The relative expression ratio of target gene was computed based on its real-time PCR efficiencies (E) and the crossing point (CP) difference (▵) of an unknown sample versus a control (▵cp mean control − mean sample). The target gene expression was normalized by a non-regulated reference gene expression, gapdH.

The choice of gapdH as control gene was based on our previous observation, by multiple RT-PCR assays, that this gene is expressed at the same level in A. actinomycetemcomitans cells grown in culture medium at different conditions (22). Furthermore, quantitative RT-PCR has also been done with some of these samples using 16S rRNA primers as internal control (data not shown), and the results did not differ significantly from those with gapdH as the control.

The effect of interaction of bacteria with epithelial cells (B or C) was evaluated for each strain by comparison with data obtained at control condition without cell interaction (A or C). In addition, the relative gene expression of strains ATCC 29523 and SUNY 465 was compared to the data obtained for strain JP2 at each studied condition (A, B, C and D). Differences were determined by ANOVA-TUKEY. Statistically significant differences were considered when p was <0.05. When significant differences were determined, fold changes in relation to control condition were represented as follows:

Fold changes=Mean ratio of gene expression at the tested condition/Mean ratio of gene expression at control.

When significant differences were determined, fold changes of strains SUNY 465 and ATCC 29523 in relation to strain JP2 at the same condition were determined as follows:

Fold changes=Mean ratio of gene expression for the tested strain/Mean ratio of gene expression for JP2.

Results

All tested strains were able to adhere to OBA-9 cells after 2 hours of interaction. The percentages of adherent cells in relation to the initial inocula were (average±SD): 0.31%±0.14 for ATCC 29523%3B 0.41%±0.014 for JP2; and 1.2%±0.62 for SUNY465.

The 13 tested genes were detected in genomes of the three strains (data not shown) and were transcribed by strain JP2; thus, the relative transcription of each gene in JP2 was used for comparison. Mean relative expression ratios after interaction with epithelial cells and the in vitro control condition are shown in Table 2. Interaction with epithelial cells led to differences in gene expression in all studied genes, except for cagE. In fact, cagE was only transcribed by strain JP2 in control and by SUNY 465 after interaction with epithelial cell. pga was upregulated after interaction with epithelial cells in all strains (Table 2). orf 859 was shown to be upregulated only in ATCC 29523 after 24 hours interaction with epithelial cells, but exhibited no detectable transcripts in the control condition.

Table 2.

Effect of interaction with epithelial cells on the relative gene expression of different A. actinomycetemcomitans isolates after 2 and 24 h of incubation

Relative gene expression after interaction of bacteria with epithelial cells (B or D) in relation to control at 2 and 24 h incubation (A or C)

Strain JP2 SUNY 465 ATCC 29523




Condition 2h [B/A] 24h[D/C] 2h [B/A] 24h[D/C] 2h [B/A] 24h[D/C]







Gene Relative gene expression mean±sd Fold changes Relative gene expression mean±sd Fold changes Relative gene expression mean±sd Fold changes Relative gene expression mean±sd Fold changes Relative gene expression mean±sd Fold changes Relative gene expression mean±sd Fold changes
flp 0.36±0.25/0.25±0.05 1.95±0.57/0.53±0.25 3.68 0.11±0.03/0.16±0.01 0.068±0.02/0.10±0.00 0.30±0.07/0.27±0.02 50.41±18.66/0.002±0.00 25,205
aae 0.54±0.28/1.048±0.52 0.65±0.27/0.42±0.09 1.01±0.08/0.39±0.03 2.6 0.96±0.31/2.07±0.19 0.43±0.03/0.001±0.00 430 19.23±4.58/0,004±0.00 4,807.5
apaH 1.06±0.015/2.22±0.67 0.48 0.47±0.24/0.62±0.19 0.00 ±0.00/0.42±0.09 0.00±0.00/0.53±0.09 # 0.18 ±0.09/0.16±0.03 8.74±1.43/0.003±0.00 2,913.33
pgA 2.09±0.65/0.23±0.04 9.09 2.43±0.26/1.03±0.12 2.36 23.94±5.56/0.30±0.10 79.8 24.19±2.21/0.66±0.14 36.7 3.81±2.12/0.02±0.00 190.5 43.39±3.98/0.15±0.13 289.27
emaA 0.204±0.04/0.27±0.00 0.23±0.01/0.09±0.01 2.56 0.019±0.00/0.052±0.01 0.37 0.06±0.02/0.11±0.03 0.55 0.01±0.00/0.0±0.00 # 0.00±0.00/0.00±0.00
vppA 5.64±0.65/9.41±1.68 3.94±1.11/7.08±0.71 0.88±0.18/2.96±0.51 0.30 2.04±1.15/10.75±1.87 0.19 0.54±0.21/0.005±0.00 108 71.49±10.66/0.008±0.01 8,936.25
cdtB 6.54±1.23/9.95±0.62 4.21±1.37/4.75±0.69 0.89±0.69/2.81±0.83 0.32 1.56±0.75/4.98±0.90 0.31 0.07±0.01/0.34±0.04 68.09±21.18/0.004±0.00 17,022.5
vapA 3.57±0.74/4.54±0.19 3.66±0.58/8.07±1.85 0.45 6.16±1.58/1.22±0.04 5.05 8.46±1.51/5.80±0.88 2.76±0.27/0.01±0.00 276 29.73±3.44/0.04±0.00 743.25
omp29 23.54±1.12/20.79±2.84 46.40±16.10/171.14±23.16 0.27 1.25±0.49/0.20±0.01 6.25 0.33±0.28/5.54±1.77 0.06 0.00±0.00/0.00±0.00 0.00±0.00/0.00±0.00
omp100 0.16±0.04/0.07±0.04 0.25±0.01/0.37±0.05 0.50±0.29/0.005±0.00 100 1.99±0.53/0.16±0.02 12.45 0.42±0.16/0.001±0.0 420 0.08±0.01/0.017±0.01 4.71
ltx 10.76±4.72/9.43±2.39 2.06±0.53/3.88±1.92 2.36±0.27/2.80±0.72 2.54±0.41/0.56±0.15 4.54 0.36±0.08/0±0.00 # 0.125±0.06/0.004±0.00 31.25
orf59 0.04±0.01/0.11±0.00 0.03±0.02/0.07±0.00 0.15±0.08/0.18±0.03 0.06±0.00/0.10±0.02 0.00±0.00/0±0.00 0.39±0.10/0.00±0.00 #
cagE 1.18±0.08/0.223±0.08 0.07±0.02/0.15±0.04 0.00±0.00/0.00±0.00 0.12±0.07/0.07±0.03 0.00±0.00/0±0.00 0.00±0.00/0.00±0.00

The data are shown as mean relative gene expression in strains JP2, SUNY 465 and ATCC 29523 after interaction with epithelial cells in relation to control condition, for 2 h [B/A] and 24 h [D/C]. Fold changes are only shown when differences in relative gene expression between control and test conditions were statistically significant.

Bold – significant difference between control (A or C) and test (interaction with epithelial cell – B or D) (Anova-Tukey p <0.05).

# no detectable transcripts at control condition or test condition, significant difference between control and test.

Fold changes=relative gene expression tested condition (with epithelial cell interaction)/relative gene expression control.

The mean relative expression ratios for each gene at each studied condition were also compared among the three strains. The levels observed for strain JP2 were considered as controls, and data provided as fold changes in relation to JP2 at each condition (Table 3). At the control, without interaction with epithelial cells, genes such as aae, omp100, emaA, and pgA were not transcribed or transcribed in very low levels by ATCC 29523 (serotype a), when compared to JP2. In addition, genes associated with host evasion such as ltxA, omp29, cdtB, and cagE were less transcribed by this strain when compared to JP2, and most of them kept being transcribed in very low levels after 2 hours interaction with epithelial cells. However, after 24 hours of interaction, several genes such as flp, aae, apaH, pgA, and cdtB were upregulated in the serotype a strain (Table 2), surpassing the mRNA relative levels encountered for JP2 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Fold changes of relative gene expression of strains ATCC 29523 and SUNY 465 in relation to strain JP2 at the same condition

Fold changes of relative gene expression in relation to JP2

2 h in culture medium [A] 2 h interaction epithelial cells [B] 24 h in culture medium [C] 24 h interaction epithelial cells [D]




Gene ATCC 29523 SUNY 465 ATCC 29523 SUNY 465 ATCC29523 SUNY 465 ATCC 29523 SUNY 465
flp 0.64 0.31 0.004 0.19 25.85 0.035
aae 0.001 0.37 0.01 4.93 29.58
apaH 0.07 0.19 0.17 0 0.01 18.60 0
pgA 0.09 1.30 11.45 0.15 17.86 9.95
emaA 0 0.19 0.05 0.09 0 0.00
vppA 0.01 0.31 0.10 0.16 0.01 18.14
cdtB 0.03 0.28 0.01 0.14 0.01 16.17 0.37
vapA 0.00 0.27 1.73 0.00 8.12 2.31
omp29 0 0.01 0.01 0.053 0 0.03 0 0.01
omp100 0.01 0.07 3.13 0.05 0.43 0.32 7.96
ltxA 0 0.30 0.03 0.22 0.00 0.14 0.061
orf859 0 1.64 0 3.75 0 13
cagE 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fold changes are only shown when differences in relative gene expression between tested strain and control strain (JP2) were statistically significant (Anova-Tukey p<0.05).

Fold changes= mean ratio of relative gene expression of tested strain/mean ratio of relative gene expression of strain JP2 at each studied condition (A, B, C, or D).

Most studied genes, except for pgA and orf859, were transcribed in lower levels by the serotype b strain SUNY 465 when compared to JP2 in the control for 2 hours (Table 3). Interaction of this strain with epithelial cells resulted in increased mRNA levels of aae, omp100, ltxA, vapA, and omp29 (Table 2). Indeed, long-term interaction (24 hours) with epithelial cells resulted in similar or higher levels of transcription of most virulence-associated genes in SUNY 465 when compared to JP2, except for omp29 (Table 3). On the other hand, the genes encoding colonization factors were several folds less transcribed in the two serotype b strains than in the serotype a after prolonged exposure to epithelial cells (Table 3).

ltxA, encoding the leukotoxin, was transcribed in lower levels by ATCC 29523 and SUNY 465 when compared with JP2 in the controls (A and C). However, interaction with epithelial cells upregulated its transcription in both strains (Table 2), and ltxA mRNA levels were similar in SUNY 465 and JP2 after long-term interaction with epithelial cells (Table 3).

The fimbriae subunit encoding gene, flp, was transcribed in low levels in the strains, as expected for smooth isolates. However, prolonged contact with epithelial cells resulted in upregulation of flp in ATCC 29523 (serotype a).

Genes within the cdt operon, cdtB and vppA (20), were transcribed in low levels after in vitro growth by ATCC 29523 (Table 3) and were upregulated after prolonged incubation with eukaryotic cells.

Discussion

Epithelium is the first physical barrier limiting bacterial penetration into tissues in the oral cavity. Using a co-culture model, we had shown that epithelial cells respond to A. actinomycetemcomitans insult by altering the transcription of selected genes, especially those involved in tissue remodeling and bone resorption (21). Bacteria may also sense the environment and change their gene expression profiles, due to signal transduction systems, increasing their fitness to the challenges promoted by the immune response. In a prior study, we have shown that A. actinomycetemcomitans senses the environment and changes gene transcription according to the phase of the in vitro growth (22).

In this study, all strains were able to adhere to gingival epithelial cells although their adhesion efficiency varied as shown previously (10). So, it was possible to evaluate the transcription profiles of the three isolates when they were firmly attached to, and/or invading the epithelial cells, condition that we have denominated as bacterial–epithelial cells interaction.

As expected, the leukotoxin encoding gene, ltxA, was several folds more expressed in JP2 than in the other strains (4). However, prolonged interaction with epithelial cells upregulated ltxA transcription in SUNY 465, but not in JP2 (Tables 2 and 3). Other studies suggested that serotype b isolates not belonging to the JP2 clone may express in vivo levels of leukotoxin equivalent to the JP2 clone (23), and our data indicate the need of further investigation on the leukotoxin levels in vivo.

flp, encoding the fimbrial subunit, was upregulated in ATCC 29523 after prolonged interaction with epithelial cells, suggesting that the fimbriated phenotype may be restored under certain circumstances. The conversion to the smooth phenotype was associated with mutations in the tad locus (24), but environmental factors such as pH, temperature, oxygen, and iron concentrations have also been shown to influence fimbriae expression (25). In addition, an early study indicated that adherence accompanied a smooth to rough phenotype shift (26). Thus, the increase in flp relative expression after cell interaction may indicate that contact with epithelial cells may positively influence fimbriae expression.

Cytolethal-distending toxin (CDT) targets a variety of cells including immune system cells and modulates the immune response by inducing apoptosis of non-proliferative monocytic cells and T lymphocytes (16, 17). mRNA levels of cdt were low in serotype a reference strain at the control condition (Table 3), supporting our previous finding that this strain is not as cytotoxic as JP2 (6, 27). However, cdtB was upregulated after prolonged cell exposure in the serotype a strain, suggesting that it may be able to produce high levels of CDT under certain conditions.

Transcriptions of aae and apaH, involved in adherence (10) and invasion to epithelial cells (13), respectively, were upregulated in ATCC 29523 after prolonged interaction with eukaryotic cells. Upregulation of apaH was also observed for strain SUNY 465 after prolonged interaction with epithelial cells (24 hours), whereas it was downregulated in JP2 after 2 hours of interaction (Table 2). ApaH is a diadenosine tetraphosphatase, member of the nudix hydrolase family. Deletion of the gene encoding Ap4A hydrolases from pathogenic bacteria reduces their ability to invade mammalian cells, which is possibly associated to a role of Ap4A as a regulator of mRNA degradation (28). Thus, the intense upregulation of apaH observed in strain ATCC 29523 after 24 hours of interaction with epithelial cells may have resulted in other changes in the transcription profile of the bacterial cell.

Furthermore, omp100, encoding the highly immunogenic autotransported protein involved in adherence to epithelial cells (11), was transcribed at low levels by strain ATCC 29523 and SUNY 465 after in vitro incubation (Table 3) when compared with JP2, and it was upregulated after interaction with epithelial cells. Indeed, omp100 mRNA levels in SUNY 465 surpassed the levels observed for JP2 (Table 3).

On the other hand, omp29 was transcribed at very low levels by ATCC 29523, and SUNY 465, when compared to JP2 in all studied conditions (Table 3). A. actinomycetemcomitans Omp29 belongs to the OmpA family, abundant outer membrane proteins conserved in gram-negative pathogens (29). This protein is associated with virulence in experimental animal models and with invasion of non-phagocytic cells (12, 29) and the higher omp29 transcript levels of JP2 may represent an additional characteristic in its pathogenic potential when compared to the others.

Thus, transcription analysis of omp100, aae, and omp29 suggests that the strategies promoted by A. actinomycetemcomitans isolates to adhere and interact with epithelial cells may differ, possibly leading to differences in cell response, according to the main adhesion molecule enrolled in the interaction. Furthermore, the low expression of omp100 and omp29 by the serotype a strain indicates that recognition by the host, and its resultant inflammatory process, may be impaired when serotype a strains colonize, explaining association of this serotype with health.

The A. actinomycetemcomitans CagE is involved in host cell apoptosis (30). cagE transcripts were detected in JP2, independently on cell contact. This gene was not transcribed in the serotype a strain (ATCC 29523) in any of the studied conditions and was only detected in SUNY 465 after interaction with epithelial cells (Table 3).

Other genes such as orf859, associated with intracellular survival of A. actinomycetemcomitans (31) and vapA, similar with Dichelobacter nodosus vap (virulence-associated protein) (32), were also poorly transcribed by serotype a in most conditions when compared to the serotype b strains. However, transcription of both genes was strongly upregulated in ATCC 29523 after prolonged interaction with epithelial cells (Table 3).

Thus, A. actinomycetemcomitans presents mechanisms for recognition of environmental changes, which alters the transcription of genes needed for survival within the host. Some genes were upregulated in the presence of epithelial cells in all strains, such as pga, which encodes the synthesis of extracellular polysaccharide involved in biofilm formation (9). However, transcripts profiles largely differed among the strains, especially between serotype a (ATCC 29523) and serotype b (JP2 and SUNY 465). The transcription of genes encoding factors related to colonization such as aae, flp, apaH, and pgA and immune modulation such as cdtB was strongly upregulated after prolonged interaction with epithelial cells in serotype a. On the other hand, genes encoding immunogenic proteins associated with virulence such as omp29 and omp100, host defense evasion (ltxA) and apoptosis (cagE) were poorly transcribed in serotype a when compared with both serotype b strains.

Strains belonging to the JP2 clone are genetically very homogeneous (33), although differences in their genomic content have been reported. On the other hand, JP2 and serotype b non-JP2 strains may present some differences in gene content (34). Furthermore, microarray data demonstrated that five operons were detected in A. actinomycetemcomitans with at least two genes with a two-fold difference or greater in expression levels between JP2 and non-JP2 genotypes in log grown cultures (34). However, the ltx operon was differentially expressed between JP2 and non-JP2 genotypes (34) as also shown here when strains JP2 and SUNY 465 were compared (Table 3). Furthermore, whilst omp29 (omp34) was highly expressed by strain JP2 at the 2 hours control assay, this gene was also highly transcribed by one strain of the JP2 clone, but not by the others (34). On the other hand, genes differentially expressed between strain JP2 and non-JP2 serotype b strain (SUNY 465) as shown here, such as omp100, were not shown to be differentially expressed by Huang et al. (34). These differences should be attributed not only to different methods (microarray versus qPCR), but also to different studied conditions and tested strains.

Taken together, these data suggested that the regulation of virulence genes in A. actinomycetemcomitans can be considered strain-specific and contributes to the understanding of the large association of serotype b with aggressive periodontitis and serotype a with health.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rosana Prisco for help in statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors declare no conflict of interest. This study was supported by FAPESP 03/08598-0 and 05/58903-0.

References

  • 1.Kittichotirat W, Bumgarner RE, Asikainen S, Chen C. Identification of the pangenome and its components in 14 distinct Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains by comparative genomic analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Asikainen S, Lai CH, Alaluusua S, Slots J. Distribution of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotypes in periodontal health and disease. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1991;6:115–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1991.tb00462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bueno LC, Mayer MP, DiRienzo JM. Relationship between conversion of localized juvenile periodontitis susceptible children from health to disease and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin promoter structure. J Periodontol. 1998;69:998–1007. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brogan JM, Lally ET, Poulsen K, Kilian M, Demuth DR. Regulation of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin expression: analysis of the promoter regions of leukotoxic and minimally leukotoxic strains. Infect Immun. 1994;62:501–8. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.2.501-508.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fine DH, Markowitz K, Furgang D, Fairlie K, Ferrandiz J, Nasri C, et al. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and its relationship to initiation of localized aggressive periodontitis: longitudinal cohort study of initially healthy adolescents. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3859–69. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00653-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kawamoto D, Ando ES, Longo PL, Nunes AC, Wikström M, Mayer MP. Genetic diversity and toxic activity of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans isolates. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009;24:493–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2009.00547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pinheiro ET, Kawamoto D, Ota-Tsuzuki C, Almeida LR, Nunes AC, Longo PL, et al. Analysis of genotypic variation in genes associated with virulence in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans clinical isolates. J Periodontal Res. 2011;46:310–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fine DH, Furgang D, Kaplan JB, Charlesworth J, Figurski DH. Tenacious adhesion of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strain CU1000 to salivary-coated hydroxyapatite. Arch Oral Biol. 1999;44:1063–76. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(99)00089-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaplan JB, Velliyagounder K, Ragunath C, Rohde H, Mack D, Knoblock JK, et al. Genes involved in the synthesis and degradation of matrix polysaccharide in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:8213–20. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.24.8213-8220.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rose JE, Meyer DH, Fives-Taylor PM. Aae, an autotransporter involved in adhesion of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2003;71:2384–93. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2384-2393.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yue G, Kaplan JB, Furgang D, Keith GM, Fine DH. A second Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans autotransporter adhesion exhibits specificity for buccal epithelial cells in humans and old world primates. Infect Immun. 2007;75:4440–4448. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02020-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kajiya M, Komatsuzawa H, Papantonakis A, Seki M, Makihira S, Ouhara K, et al. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Omp29 is associated with bacterial entry to gingival epithelial cells by F-actin rearrangement. PLos Onei. 2011;6:e18287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saarela M, Asikanen S, Alaluusua S, Fives-Taylor PM. apaH polymorphism in clinical Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans isolates. Anaerobe. 1998;4:139–44. doi: 10.1006/anae.1998.0158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dietmann A, Millonig A, Combes V, Couraud P-O, Kachlany S, Grau GE. Effects of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin on endothelial cells. Microb Pathog. 2013;61–62:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Damek-Poprawa M, Haris M, Volgina A, Korostoff J, DiRienzo JM. Cytolethal distending toxin damages the oral epithelium of gingival explants. J Dent Res. 2011;90:874–9. doi: 10.1177/0022034511403743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fernandes KP, Mayer MP, Ando ES, Ulbrich AG, Amarantes-Mendes JG, Russo M. Inhibition of interferon-gamma-induced nitric oxide production in endotoxin-activated macrophages by cytolethal distending toxin. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008;23:360–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rabin SDP, Flitton JG, Demuth DR. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans cytolethal distending toxin induces apoptosis in nonproliferating macrophages by a phosphatase-independent mechanism. Infect Immun. 2009;77:3161–9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01227-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Richardson J, Craighead JC, Cao SL, Handfield M. Concurrence between the gene expression pattern of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in localized aggressive periodontitis and in human epithelial cells. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:497–504. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45949-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pfafll MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:9–36. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.9.e36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mayer MPA, Bueno LC, Hansen EJ, DiRienzo JM. Identification of a cytolethal distending toxin gene locus and features of a virulence associated region in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans . Infect Immun. 1999;67:1227–37. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.3.1227-1237.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Umeda JE, Demuth DR, Ando ES, Faveri M, Mayer MP. Signaling transduction analysis in gingival epithelial cells after infection with Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans . Mol Oral Microbiol. 2012;27:23–33. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2011.00629.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Longo PL, Nunes ACR, Umeda JE, Mayer MPA. Gene expression and phenotypic traits of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in response to environmental changes. J Periodontal Res. 2013 doi: 10.1111/jre.12067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kachlany SC. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin: from threat to therapy. J Dent Res. 2010;89:561–70. doi: 10.1177/0022034510363682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tomich M, Planet PJ, Figurski DH. The tad locus: postcards from the widespread colonization island. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:363–75. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Scannapieco FA, Millar SJ, Reynolds HS, Zambon JJ, Levine MJ. Effects of anaerobiosis on the surface proteins of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Haemophilus actinomycetemcomitans) . Infect Immun. 1987;55:2320–3. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.9.2320-2323.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meyer DH, Fives-Taylor PM. Characteristics of adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1994;62:928–35. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.3.928-935.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fabris AS, DiRienzo JM, Wikström M, Mayer MP. Detection of cytolethal distending toxin activity and cdt genes in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans isolates from geographically diverse populations. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2002;17:231–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-302x.2002.170405.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McLennan AG. Substrate ambiguity among the nudix hydrolases: biologically significant, evolutionary remnant, or both? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:373–85. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Smith SG, Mahon V, Lambert MA, Fagan RP. A molecular Swiss army knife: OmpA, structure, function and expression. FEMS Microbiol Letter. 2007;273:1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Teng YTA, Hu W. Expression cloning of a periodontitis-associated apoptotic effector, cagE homologue, in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;303:1086–94. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00471-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cao SL, Progulske-Fox A, Hillman JD, Handfield M. In vivo induced antigenic determinants of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans . FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;237:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Blommfield GA, Whittlw G, McDonagah MB, Katz ME, Cheetham BF. Analysis of sequences flanking the vap regions of Dichelobacter nodosus: evidence for multiple integration events, a killer system, and a new genetic element. Microbiology. 1997;143:553–62. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-2-553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Haubek D, Poulsen K, Kilian M. Microevolution and patterns of dissemination of the JP2 clone of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans . Infect Immun. 2007;75:3080–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01734-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang Y, Kittichotirat W, Mayer MP, Hall R, Bumgarner R, Chen C. Comparative genomic hybridization and transcriptome analysis with a pan-genome microarray reveal distinctions between JP2 and non-JP2 genotypes of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans . Mol Oral Microbiol. 2013;28:1–17. doi: 10.1111/omi.12005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Oral Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES