Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1973 Jan;25(1):77–85. doi: 10.1128/am.25.1.77-85.1973

Comparison of Methods for Isolation of Anaerobic Bacteria from Clinical Specimens

Jon E Rosenblatt 1,2, Ann Fallon 1,2, Sydney M Finegold 1,2
PMCID: PMC380739  PMID: 4568893

Abstract

Five different anaerobic culture methods and several different media were compared for their ability to recover anaerobes from clinical specimens. Specimens were obtained from patients with documented infections, avoiding contamination with normal flora, and immediately placed in an anaerobic transporter. Each specimen was cultured by all methods and on all the various media. The comparative data indicate that anaerobic jars (GasPak and evacuation-replacement types) are just as effective in the recovery of clinically significant anaerobes as the more complex roll-tube and chamber methods employing prereduced media. Liquid media were disappointing as a „back-up” system but chopped-meat glucose was superior to two thioglycolate formulations. Growth of all anaerobes was poorer on selective media, but these media were very helpful in the workup of specimens containing mixed growth of anaerobic and facultative organisms. A variety of different anaerobes was isolated, but no very fastidious or extremely oxygen-sensitive organisms were recovered. This suggests that such organisms may not play a significant role in causing clinical infections.

Full text

PDF
77

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arank A., Syed S. A., Kenney E. B., Freter R. Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from human gingiva and mouse cecum by means of a simplified glove box procedure. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Apr;17(4):568–576. doi: 10.1128/am.17.4.568-576.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Attebery H. R., Finegold S. M. A miniature anaerobic jar for tissue transport or for cultivation of anaerobes. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970 Mar;53(3):383–388. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/53.3.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Attebery H. R., Finegold S. M. Combined screw-cap and rubber-stopper closure for Hungate tubes (pre-reduced anaerobically sterilized roll tubes and liquid media). Appl Microbiol. 1969 Oct;18(4):558–561. doi: 10.1128/am.18.4.558-561.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BORNSTEIN D. L., WEINBERG N., SWARTZ M. N., KUNZ L. J. ANAEROBIC INFECTIONS--REVIEW OF CURRENT EXPERIENCE. Medicine (Baltimore) 1964 May;43:207–232. doi: 10.1097/00005792-196405000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drasar B. S. Cultivation of anaerobic intestinal bacteria. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967 Oct;94(2):417–427. doi: 10.1002/path.1700940223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin W. J. Practical method for isolation of anerobic bacteria in the clinical laboratory. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1168–1171. doi: 10.1128/am.22.6.1168-1171.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McMinn M. T., Crawford J. J. Recovery of anaerobic microorganisms from clinical specimens in prereduced media versus recovery by routine clinical laboratory methods. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Feb;19(2):207–213. doi: 10.1128/am.19.2.207-213.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moore W. B. Solidified media suitable for the cultivation of Clostridium novyi type B. J Gen Microbiol. 1968 Oct;53(3):415–423. doi: 10.1099/00221287-53-3-415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore W. E., Cato E. P., Holdeman L. V. Anaerobic bacteria of the gastrointestinal flora and their occurrence in clinical infections. J Infect Dis. 1969 Jun;119(6):641–649. doi: 10.1093/infdis/119.6.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. STOKES E. J. Anaerobes in routine diagnostic cultures. Lancet. 1958 Mar 29;1(7022):668–670. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(58)91087-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Spears R. W., Freter R. Improved isolation of anaerobic bacteria from the mouse cecum by maintaining continuous strict anaerobiosis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967 Mar;124(3):903–909. doi: 10.3181/00379727-124-31882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Antibiotic disc susceptibility tests for rapid presumptive identification of Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jan;21(1):13–20. doi: 10.1128/am.21.1.13-20.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES