Abstract
Recently, novel H7N9 influenza viruses have caused an unprecedented outbreak in humans. Pigs are an important intermediate host for influenza; thus, we assessed the replication ability of three human H7N9 viruses (A/Anhui/1/2013, A/Shanghai/1/2013, A/Shanghai/2/2013) in swine tissue explants. All viruses tested replicated efficiently in explants from tracheas and bronchi, with limited replication in alveolar cells. Swine respiratory tissue explants can serve as an efficient model for screening replication potential of newly emerging H7N9 viruses.
TEXT
In the spring of 2013, human infections with novel avian-origin H7N9 influenza viruses were reported in China (1), marking the first time this subtype has appeared in humans. One hundred thirty-four human infections have been confirmed, with a resulting mortality rate of approximately 32% (2–4). Identification of the source of the viruses is under investigation, but exposure to infected domestic poultry has been indicated in the majority of the cases. At present, human-to-human transmission is unsustained (5).
The H7N9 viruses contain genes solely of avian origin, with surface proteins donated from ducks or other aquatic waterfowl and internal proteins from chickens or other migratory wild birds (2, 6). Currently, there are two lineages of H7N9 viruses reported, with A/Anhui/1/13 (Anhui/1)-like viruses possessing molecular markers associated with adaptation to humans: mutations in the receptor binding hemagglutinin (HA) protein that confer enhanced binding to mammalian receptors (S138A, G186V, and Q226L [H3 numbering]) and the E627K mutation in PB2 that facilitates replication of avian influenza viruses in mammals (2, 7). A/Shanghai/1/13 (Shang/1)-like viruses lack these markers. But all H7N9 viruses have high nucleotide substitution rates and positive selective pressure at the protein level (8), in addition to the inherent high reassortment capacity of influenza viruses. Collectively, these characteristics could lead to generation of a pandemic virus capable of spreading not only from birds to humans but also from humans to other humans.
Swine have long been recognized as an intermediate host for influenza viruses and can facilitate the adaptation and movement of avian viruses into humans (9). Most recently, swine played a critical role in the genesis of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus (10). To date, no H7N9 infections from the recent outbreak have been reported for swine. Surveillance of swine farms in the affected regions have yielded over 4,000 animal or environmental samples, all of which have been negative (5). These viruses have already shown the ability to infect humans, and the potential that they may infect swine and generate additional mammalian adaptations is a significant public health concern. Recent studies by Zhu et al. demonstrated that a single human H7N9 isolate could infect pigs experimentally but could not be transmitted to cage mates (11). For further risk assessment and understanding of the pathogenesis of H7N9 viruses in swine, evaluation of additional human H7N9 isolates is warranted. However, studies that involve a large animal model, such as swine, can be cumbersome and expensive. Recently, models have been developed for culture and infection of swine respiratory tissues ex vivo. Importantly, these respiratory tissue explants retain their structure and receptor specificity and mimic the infection patterns observed for live animals (12–14). Furthermore, these ex vivo studies provide for a rapid and humane option to test larger numbers of influenza virus isolates to preselect virus candidates or to use as a substitute for live-animal studies.
Here, we have examined the ability of three genetically distinct human H7N9 isolates, A/Anhui/1/2013 (Anhui/1), A/Shanghai/1/2013 (Shang/1), and A/Shanghai/2/2013 (Shang/2) to replicate in swine upper airway (trachea) or lower airway (lung) tissue explants. Viruses Anhui/1, Shang/1, and Shang/2 were isolated from patients who progressed to severe respiratory distress and ultimately death (15). As controls, we used A/Swine/Missouri/2124514/06 (Swine/MO; H2N3), a swine virus isolate for which replication in pigs has since been recapitulated experimentally (16), and A/Duck/New Jersey/7872-27/95 (Duck/NJ; H2N2), an avian virus that does not replicate in swine tissues (J. C. Jones, unpublished data). Viruses were propagated and titrated in embryonated chicken eggs, and a 50% egg infectious dose (EID50) was determined. Tissue samples were obtained from 1-week-old piglets, and respiratory tissue explants (5 mm) were prepared as previously described (12, 14). The explants were maintained on Transwell inserts (Corning, Tewksbury, MA) with the basal chamber containing bronchial epithelial cell basal medium (BEBM) supplemented with SingleQuot growth factors (Lonza, Walkersville, MD). After explant preparation, the medium was replaced every 3 h, with a total three changes, in order to remove cytokines, and the explants were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for >18 h before inoculation. The explants were washed extensively with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) prior to inoculation with 106 EID50 units/explant. After a 1-h adsorption, the explants were washed 2 times with 0.9% NaCl, pH 2.2, and 3 times with PBS. For each time point indicated (see Fig. 1), 300 μl of infection medium (BEBM plus 0.5% bovine serum albumin) was added to the apical surface for 30 min, harvested, and titrated on MDCKs, with the 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) determined using the method of Reed and Muench (17). Tissue samples were obtained every 24 h for 3 days. Data are representative of results of 3 or 4 independent experiments with two or more explants per tissue and per virus.
Fig 1.
Replication kinetics of human H7N9 viruses in swine respiratory explants. Respiratory tissue explants from the trachea (A) or lungs (B) were inoculated with 106 EID50 units/explant. At the indicated time points, virus shed from the explants was titrated in MDCK cells. The log10 TCID50s/ml are shown. Error bars indicate standard deviations (SD) for triplicate (H7N9) viruses or duplicate (H2N2 or H2N3 control) explants. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]) compared to results for H2N3 swine control virus.
As expected, Swine/MO was able to productively replicate in both tracheal and lung explants (Fig. 1A and B). The negative-control avian virus, Duck/NJ, failed to replicate in either tissue at any time point sampled. The three human H7N9 viruses tested replicated efficiently in both tracheal and lung explants, with the highest virus titers detected at 48 or 72 h postinoculation (hpi). Notably, there was a statistically significant delay in replication of Anhui/1 at 24 hpi (P < 0.001) in tracheal explants compared to results for the control H2N3 swine virus (Fig. 1A). All viruses, apart from Duck/NJ, replicated to statistically indistinguishable levels in the lung explants (Fig. 1B). Importantly, all detectable virus titers at 48 and 72 hpi were significantly higher than those of carryover titers detected at 1 hpi (P ≤ 0.01).
All human H7N9 viruses and Swine/MO-infected tissues displayed positive influenza nucleoprotein (NP) antigen staining as expected. NP staining was detected in tracheal epithelia inoculated with influenza viruses Anhui/1, Shang/1, Shang/2, and Swine/MO (Fig. 2). In lung explants, viral antigen staining was largely restricted to the bronchi, with the exception of Anhui/1, Shang/2 and Swine/MO, for which limited positive viral antigen staining was detected in cells of the alveoli adjacent to infected bronchi. In contrast, no viral antigen staining was detected in either tracheal or lung explants inoculated with avian influenza Duck/NJ virus.
Fig 2.
Immunohistochemical analysis of swine respiratory explants inoculated with human H7N9 viruses. Tracheal (A, C, E, G, and I) and lung (B, D, F, H, and J) explants at 48 or 72 hpi inoculated with human H7N9 Anhui/1 (A and B), Shang/1 (C and D), Shang/2 (E and F), positive-control Swine/MO (G and H), or negative-control Duck/NJ (I and J) influenza viruses were analyzed. Tissues were fixed and stained for influenza A virus nucleoprotein (brown) and imaged at an objective magnification of ×10 (lung) or ×20 (trachea). In tracheal explants, influenza A viral antigen-positive cells (black arrows) were diffusely spread in tracheal epithelium inoculated with H7N9 viruses (A and C) and in the swine virus control (G) and as multiple foci in Shang/2 influenza virus-inoculated samples (E). Antigen-positive cells were also found as a continuous line in bronchial epithelium (red arrows) inoculated with H7N9 viruses (B, D, and F) and in the swine virus control (H) and as single alveolar cells (B, D, and H) in lung explants. Antigen-positive cells were limited to the bronchial epithelium in lung explants inoculated with Shang/2 (F).
Several factors contribute to the important role that swine play in the genesis and dissemination of novel influenza viruses: (i) both human-like α2,6- and avian-like α2,3-linked sialosides are present in the porcine respiratory tract, (ii) experimental studies have confirmed the susceptibility of pigs to both avian and human influenza viruses (12), and (iii) pigs commonly interact with both humans and avian species in agricultural settings. The emergence of avian H7N9 viruses that are capable of infecting humans and that possess multiple molecular markers associated with adaptation to mammals is unprecedented and troubling. To date, there is little evidence of human-to-human transmission of H7N9; however, the potential circulation of this virus in pigs may provide critical changes that alter pathogenicity or transmission potential. In this study, we build upon in vivo observations from Zhu et al., who demonstrated a single H7N9 isolate (A/Shanghai/2/13) is able to replicate in pigs with peak titers ranging between 3.5 and 5.6 log10 TCID50/ml (11). We have demonstrated ex vivo that three human H7N9 viruses, including the genetically distinct Shang/1 virus, are able to replicate in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts of pigs, with peak titers ranging from 6.0 to 7.2 log10 TCID50/ml. The slightly higher titers seen with the explants than those seen in vivo (11) may be due to differences in relative inoculum and tissue size between the ex vivo model and a live pig. However, lowering the starting inoculum by multiple logs (104 EID50 units/explant) yields similar infectious titers and growth kinetics (data not shown).
This study confirms that recently emerged H7N9 viruses are capable of infecting pigs, consistent with the work of others (11, 18). This significantly increases the risk associated with H7N9 viruses and their potential for acquisition of mutations or gene segments that could enhance transmissibility in mammals. Confirmed human infections in July 2013 support the idea that these viruses are still at large in the field (4), but currently, no systematic swine H7N9 influenza virus surveillance is performed in Northern or Eastern China. The data from this study validates the swine explant model for screening the replication potential of H7N9 viruses in porcine tissues and, more broadly, indicates that this model will be valuable for screening the host range and pathogenicity of emerging influenza viruses before proceeding with live-animal models.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by contract no. HHSN266200700005C from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).
We thank Shyamli Basuroy, Alex Fedinec, Charles Leffler, and Elena Parfenova for providing animals for these studies, Renee Chan for her expert advice in explant preparation, and Stephanie Sonnberg, Kimberly Friedman, and James Knowles for assistance in preparing the manuscript.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 11 September 2013
REFERENCES
- 1.Chang SY, Lin PH, Tsai JC, Hung CC, Chang SC. 2013. The first case of H7N9 influenza in Taiwan. Lancet 381:1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu D, Shi W, Shi Y, Wang D, Xiao H, Li W, Bi Y, Wu Y, Li X, Yan J, Liu W, Zhao G, Yang W, Wang Y, Ma J, Shu Y, Lei F, Gao GF. 2013. Origin and diversity of novel avian influenza A H7N9 viruses causing human infection: phylogenetic, structural, and coalescent analyses. Lancet 381:1926–1932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen Y, Liang W, Yang S, Wu N, Gao H, Sheng J, Yao H, Wo J, Fang Q, Cui D, Li Y, Yao X, Zhang Y, Wu H, Zheng S, Diao H, Xia S, Chan KH, Tsoi HW, Teng JL, Song W, Wang P, Lau SY, Zheng M, Chan JF, To KK, Chen H, Li L, Yuen KY. 2013. Human infections with the emerging avian influenza A H7N9 virus from wet market poultry: clinical analysis and characterisation of viral genome. Lancet 381:1916–1925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization 20 July 2013, posting date Human infection with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus---update. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2013_07_20/en/index.html [Google Scholar]
- 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013. Emergence of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus causing severe human illness—China, February-April 2013. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 62:366–371 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kageyama T, Fujisaki S, Takashita E, Xu H, Yamada S, Uchida Y, Neumann G, Saito T, Kawaoka Y, Tashiro M. 2013. Genetic analysis of novel avian A(H7N9) influenza viruses isolated from patients in China, February to April 2013. Euro Surveill. 18:20453. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu Q, Lu L, Sun Z, Chen GW, Wen Y, Jiang S. 2013. Genomic signature and protein sequence analysis of a novel influenza A (H7N9) virus that causes an outbreak in humans in China. Microbes Infect. 15:432–439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang L, Zhang Z, Weng Z, Shi W. Substitution rates of the internal genes in the novel avian H7N9 influenza virus. Clin. Infect. Dis., in press [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuiken T, Fouchier R, Rimmelzwaan G, van den Brand J, van Riel D, Osterhaus A. 2011. Pigs, poultry, and pandemic influenza: how zoonotic pathogens threaten human health. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 719:59–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brockwell-Staats C, Webster RG, Webby RJ. 2009. Diversity of influenza viruses in swine and the emergence of a novel human pandemic influenza A (H1N1). Influenza Other Respi. Viruses 3:207–213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhu H, Wang D, Kelvin DJ, Li L, Zheng Z, Yoon SW, Wong SS, Farooqui A, Wang J, Banner D, Chen R, Zheng R, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Hong W, Dong W, Cai Q, Roehrl MH, Huang SS, Kelvin AA, Yao T, Zhou B, Chen X, Leung GM, Poon LL, Webster RG, Webby RJ, Peiris JS, Guan Y, Shu Y. 2013. Infectivity, transmission, and pathology of human-isolated H7N9 influenza virus in ferrets and pigs. Science 341:183–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Van Poucke SG, Nicholls JM, Nauwynck HJ, Van Reeth K. 2010. Replication of avian, human and swine influenza viruses in porcine respiratory explants and association with sialic acid distribution. Virol. J. 7:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nunes SF, Murcia PR, Tiley LS, Brown IH, Tucker AW, Maskell DJ, Wood JL. 2010. An ex vivo swine tracheal organ culture for the study of influenza infection. Influenza Other Respi. Viruses 4:7–15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chan RW, Kang SS, Yen HL, Li AC, Tang LL, Yu WC, Yuen KM, Chan IW, Wong DD, Lai WW, Kwong DL, Sihoe AD, Poon LL, Guan Y, Nicholls JM, Peiris JS, Chan MC. 2011. Tissue tropism of swine influenza viruses and reassortants in ex vivo cultures of the human respiratory tract and conjunctiva. J. Virol. 85:11581–11587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gao R, Cao B, Hu Y, Feng Z, Wang D, Hu W, Chen J, Jie Z, Qiu H, Xu K, Xu X, Lu H, Zhu W, Gao Z, Xiang N, Shen Y, He Z, Gu Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Zhao X, Zhou L, Li X, Zou S, Zhang Y, Yang L, Guo J, Dong J, Li Q, Dong L, Zhu Y, Bai T, Wang S, Hao P, Yang W, Han J, Yu H, Li D, Gao GF, Wu G, Wang Y, Yuan Z, Shu Y. 2013. Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 368:1888–1897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ma W, Vincent AL, Gramer MR, Brockwell CB, Lager KM, Janke BH, Gauger PC, Patnayak DP, Webby RJ, Richt JA. 2007. Identification of H2N3 influenza A viruses from swine in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:20949–20954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reed LJ, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hygiene 27:493–497 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Watanabe T, Kiso M, Fukuyama S, Nakajima N, Imai M, Yamada S, Murakami S, Yamayoshi S, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Sakoda Y, Takashita E, McBride R, Noda T, Hatta M, Imai H, Zhao D, Kishida N, Shirakura M, de Vries RP, Shichinohe S, Okamatsu M, Tamura T, Tomita Y, Fujimoto N, Goto K, Katsura H, Kawakami E, Ishikawa I, Watanabe S, Ito M, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Sugita Y, Uraki R, Yamaji R, Eisfeld AJ, Zhong G, Fan S, Ping J, Maher EA, Hanson A, Uchida Y, Saito T, Ozawa M, Neumann G, Kida H, Odagiri T, Paulson JC, Hasegawa H, Tashiro M, Kawaoka Y. Characterization of H7N9 influenza A viruses isolated from humans. Nature, in press [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]