Significance
Superconductivity and magnetism have been considered to be in competition with each other. The discovery of high-TC superconductivity in iron-based compounds, however, drastically alters this concept, as the origin of its superconductivity is closely related to magnetism of iron. Here we report the interplay of magnetic and structural transitions in a parent compound of iron-based superconductor BaFe2As2 at high pressures, in which magnetic ordering precedes the structural transition at high pressures. Our results can be understood in terms of spin fluctuations in the emerging nematic phase before long-range magnetic order. Our findings provide valuable insights into exploring the interplay between magnetism and structure hence to better understand the superconductivity in iron-based compounds.
Keywords: ferropnictide-type superconductor, high-pressure effect, spin order
Abstract
The recent discovery of iron ferropnictide superconductors has received intensive concern in connection with magnetically involved superconductors. Prominent features of ferropnictide superconductors are becoming apparent: the parent compounds exhibit an antiferromagnetic ordered spin density wave (SDW) state, the magnetic-phase transition is always accompanied by a crystal structural transition, and superconductivity can be induced by suppressing the SDW phase via either chemical doping or applied external pressure to the parent state. These features generated considerable interest in the interplay between magnetism and structure in chemically doped samples, showing crystal structure transitions always precede or coincide with magnetic transition. Pressure-tuned transition, on the other hand, would be more straightforward to superconducting mechanism studies because there are no disorder effects caused by chemical doping; however, remarkably little is known about the interplay in the parent compounds under controlled pressure due to the experimental challenge of in situ measuring both of magnetic and crystal structure evolution at high pressure and low temperatures. Here we show from combined synchrotron Mössbauer and X-ray diffraction at high pressures that the magnetic ordering surprisingly precedes the structural transition at high pressures in the parent compound BaFe2As2, in sharp contrast to the chemical-doping case. The results can be well understood in terms of the spin fluctuations in the emerging nematic phase before the long-range magnetic order that sheds light on understanding how the parent compound evolves from a SDW state to a superconducting phase, a key scientific inquiry of iron-based superconductors.
High pressure is very effective to modify crystal or electronic structures that often lead to new material states of interdisciplinary interest from geosciences across chemistry to physics (1–5). Pressure is especially unique in generating or tuning superconducting states with the advantage of not introducing disorder effects in comparison to chemical doping (3); hence it is more favorable to intrinsic properties studies. The recent discovery of iron pnictide (or ferropnictides) superconductors (6–9) has shed new light on unconventional superconductors involved with magnetic elements that are previously considered to be incompatible to superconductivity. The spins of iron in ferropnictides are periodically modulated and localized in space forming the spin density wave (SDW) parent state, whereas such antiferromagnetically ordered magnetism (AFM) is also closely related to the superconductivity in cuprates and other unconventional superconductors. Magnetism has been suggested to play a crucial role in the occurrence of high TC in ferropnictides, in which the paramagnetic (PM) to AFM transition is accompanied by a tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural transition in systems like LaFeAsO (10) or BaFe2As2 (11).
The 122 ternary AFe2As2 (A = alkaline metals Ca, Sr and Ba) compounds, characterized by pairs of tetrahedral FeAs layers, have clearly demonstrated pressure-induced high TC superconductivity with well-defined magnetic and structural characteristics (12–15). Upon cooling, the undoped parent compounds of the 122 system exhibit a tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural transition strongly coupled by a paramagnetic-to-antiferromagnetic transition that takes place at the temperature that coincides with the structural-phase transition (14). Chemical doping has been found to strongly suppress this transition. Recent study on Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 shows that the structural transition precedes the magnetic transition in decreasing temperature for a fixed amount of chemical-doping fraction (16). Moreover, experimental results on underdoped Ba0.84K0.16Fe2As2 single crystals, with excellent chemical homogeneity, have further shown that the magnetic and structural transitions are indeed separated (17) with the structural transition occurring at higher temperature. It is noted that the antiferromagnetic transition is always preceded by or coincident with a tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural distortion. This observation indicates that the structural distortion is related to an electronic-phase transition due to C4 symmetry break as a result of long-range ordering (18–20).
High pressure has been shown to effectively suppress AFM ordering and to induce a high TC in the system (21, 22). Similar to the chemical doping, applied pressure has been found to cause the same effects on tuning the SDW state to superconductivity (23–28). Because AFM ordering is strongly coupled with structural distortion, further investigation under controlled pressure temperature (P-T) conditions using in situ probes sensitive to these transitions is needed to unravel the intrinsic interplay between structure and magnetism in the parent compound of iron-based superconductors. Here we report the studies on the magnetic and structural transitions of BaFe2As2 investigated using synchrotron Mössbauer spectroscopy (SMS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) in a cryogenically cooled high-pressure diamond anvil cell (DAC) with a highly hydrostatic pressure medium of neon. Study of the 122 system at high pressures was chosen as high-quality single-crystal and powder samples can be well synthesized and prepared. Our SMS spectra with very high energy resolution were used to derive hyperfine parameters that are extremely sensitive to the local magnetic moment ordering of the sample, whereas microfocused XRD patterns provide information on lattice parameters and their degrees of distortion. The combined results show that mesoscopic magnetic ordering that can be detected by subtle SMS precedes the structural distortion over temperature cooling at high pressures, different from that of chemical doping where the crystal structure transitions always precede the magnetic-phase transitions. These results indicated the emerging nematic phase before long-range spin order.
Results and Discussion
The temperature-dependent SMS spectra for BaFe2As2 at various pressures are well represented by the modeled SMS spectra (Fig. 1). The higher-temperature tetragonal-phase exhibits paramagnetism such that its SMS spectrum is shown as a smooth, exponentially decayed line (29). Over temperature decrease at high pressures, BaFe2As2 undergoes a magnetic transition with the occurrence of the hyperfine magnetic moments shown as the first minimum quantum beat in the SMS spectra (Fig. 1). Our derived hyperfine magnetic field is consistent with previous results under ambient pressure and low temperatures (30); at 100 K and ambient pressure, our calculated hyperfine field is 5.1 (±1.0) T compared with 5.23 T observed at 77 K in the literature (30). The derived hyperfine magnetic fields as a function of temperature show the onset of the magnetic transition with a sharp increase in the magnetic moment (Fig. 2). As pressure increases, the hyperfine magnetic field decreases, and the magnetic transition region broadens, implying the suppressed magnetism by applied pressure. The magnetic transition pressure in the powder sample is slightly lower than that in the single-crystal sample at a given temperature, indicating that enhanced anisotropic strain decreases the magnetic transition pressure.
Rietveld full-profile refinements of the microfocused XRD spectra show the tetragonal (space group: I4/mmm) to orthorhombic (space group: Fmmm) structural transition with decreasing temperature at 12.5 GPa (Fig. 3A). The (220) line can be well modeled for a single peak at 80 K in the tetragonal phase, whereas it is evident that the (220) line splits into (400) and (040) peaks at 15 K. The variation of the lattice parameters with decreasing temperature is depicted in Fig. 3B. As the splitting of the (220) peak in the tetragonal structure to the (400) and (040) peaks in the orthorhombic structure at 30 K, the a axis splits into a and b axes, showing the onset of the structural transition in the P-T–phase diagram (Figs. 3 and 4). We also show a portion of the diffraction patterns of BaFe2As2 at selected pressures at 15 K with 2θ between 14.3° and 20° in Fig. 3C. The (400) and (040) peaks merged into a single peak at around 13.7 GPa, indicating that applied pressure drives the structural transition from the tetragonal to the orthorhombic phase at 15 K.
Using both high-resolution SMS and XRD results, we have constructed the phase diagram of BaFe2As2 as a function of high pressures and low temperatures (Fig. 4). The extreme energy sensitivity plus high spatial resolution based on synchrotron Mössbauer effects at high pressure provide the possibility to detect mesoscopic ordered local magnetic moment, i.e., the nematic phase which will be addressed in greater detail in the text. Thus, obtained magnetic-order temperature is assigned to T* as shown in Fig. 4, whereas the structural transition temperature (TS) was derived from the refined XRD patterns. Because the magnetic transition occurs over a certain temperature region at a given pressure, the onset of the T* is derived as the mean of the two experimental temperatures between the last appearance of the PM state and the first appearance of the AFM state (Figs. 2 and 4). For comparison, the superconducting temperature (TC) was taken from previous electrical resistivity measurements using hydrostatic medium similar to our experiments (28). Below 3 GPa, the magnetic transition occurs over a narrower temperature region, and the T* curve coincides with the TS by XRD and resistivity measurements as shown in Figs. 2 and 4. At higher pressures, the magnetic transition broadens, and the onset of the T* curve increasingly precedes the TS curve in temperature decrease even up to about 15 GPa, where the magnetic ordering has been completely suppressed.
The separation and deviation of the structural and magnetic transitions has been reported in 1111-type LaFeAsO and NdFeAsO, with the structural transition preceding the magnetic transition (31, 32). However, in the peculiar 122-type parent compounds, the separation of the structural and magnetic transitions is only observed in chemically doped compounds with induced disorder, in which the structural transition is observed to occur before the magnetic transition in temperature decrease. Here we use the nematic magnetic-order model to explain the separation of the transitions at high pressures (33). The nematic transition temperature, which describes the orientation order between two different AFM sublattices, occurs above the onset of the static magnetic order and has been observed in chemically doped BaFe2As2 compound (34, 35). For the iron arsenide compounds, the nematic phase corresponds to the orientation order between two AFM sublattices that are only weakly coupled in the PM state because of the frustration induced by the next-nearest–neighbor magnetic interactions (36). With the application of high pressure, an increased alignment of the magnetic moments is induced before the structural transition takes place, indicating that localized AFM alignment of the spins can precede the structural transition. This temperature corresponds to the T*. The magnetic transition encourages the structural-phase transition from the tetragonal to the orthorhombic phase under high pressure via the C4 symmetry broken. The BaFe2As2 compound has been proposed to be a dynamic SDW phase with a striped AFM state (37). According to the model, the interlayer magnetism along the c axis is very small, and the antiphase boundaries are formed along the a and b axes of the orthorhombic phase at low temperatures. Considering that the magnetic transition concurs with the structural transition in the BaFe2As2 system at ambient pressure, the antiphase boundaries are pinned by the interlayer coherency along the c axis below the transition temperature. Above the structural transition temperature, the twinning domain will dominate the PM state. It should be noted that, on the timescale of our SMS experiments on the order of ∼10−8 s, the fluctuations of the twinning domains (37) (the nematic phase) are too fast to be observed completely. In fact, what we have observed by the high-resolution Mössbauer should be the local spin that occurs before the macroscopic structural-phase transition. Although the orientation of the twinning domains is conserved in the FeAs layers across the structural transition at low temperatures, the bulk magnetic symmetry breaks apart from the C4 symmetry. As a result, the AFM state exhibits detectable magnetic moments shown in Mössbauer spectra in three dimensions, and it occurs in decreasing temperature before the structural transition under high pressures.
Our results here indicate that Fe+2 exhibits mesoscopic spin moments right before the structural transition in temperature decrease. That is, the local moments involving the fluctuation and interaction of the electron spins thus play a key role in the origin of superconductivity in pnictides. These results enable one to understand how the magnetic order in a mesoscopic scale proceeds to the macroscopic crystal structure-phase transition in high-TC ferropnictide. These high-pressure results reveal a pure tuning on the physics of the system that is distinct from the chemical doping, providing valuable, direct insight into exploring the interplay between magnetism and structure transitions.
Methods
Single-Crystal Growth.
Single-crystalline BaFe2As2 samples with 20 atom% 57Fe enrichment were grown by the FeAs self-flux method (15).
Magnetic Moment Detection at High Pressures.
Powder samples were gently ground from the 57Fe-enriched single crystals and were later used for SMS and X-ray diffraction experiments. SMS experiments were conducted in a membrane DAC at the beamline 16-IDD of the Advanced Photon Source (APS). A synchrotron X-ray beam of 30 (V) × 50 (H) µm, ΔE/E ∼1 × 10−7 in resolution and 14.4125 keV corresponding to the nuclear transition energy of the 57Fe nuclei was used to measure the SMS spectra of 57Fe-doped sample. Both powder and single-crystal samples with 100 µm in diameter and 15–20 µm in thickness (corresponding to an effective thickness of five) were used for the experiments to understand the effect of anisotropic stress on the magnetic transition. A rhenium gasket was preindented to a thickness of 30 µm by a pair of 400-µm culets, and a hole of 150 µm was subsequently drilled in it and used as the sample chamber. The sample was loaded into the sample chamber using Ne as the pressure medium, together with a few ruby spheres for pressure determination. A helium-cooled cold-finger cryostat was used to cool the sample in the DAC to as low as 6 K; temperatures of the DAC were equilibrated for a couple of hours after each cooling and were measured using two thermocouples attached each side of the DAC. Pressures of the sample chamber were controlled by a membrane diaphragm and measured in situ using an online ruby system before and after the SMS collection. To determine the effects of hydrostaticity on the magnetism of the sample, the SMS experiments were also conducted using mineral oil (a mixture of heavy hydrocarbons) as a pressure medium. SMS spectra were collected by an avalanche photodiode detector at the nuclear forward scattering geometry with a collection time of 1–2 h. The SMS spectra were fitted using the CONUSS (COherent NUclear resonant Scattering by Single crystals) program (38) to derive the hyperfine magnetic fields.
Structure Characterizations at High Pressures.
Angle-dispersive powder XRD measurements were carried out at the 16-IDD beam line of the APS. A monochromatic X-ray beam with a wavelength of 0.37379 Å and a focused beam size of 5 (V) × 10 (H) µm was used. The 57Fe-enriched powder samples were loaded into the same DAC in the same cryostat using a Ne pressure medium and ruby pressure calibrate. Analyses of the XRD patterns, before and after the grinding, showed consistent sample lattice parameters, ensuring that grinding does not introduce additional strain on the sample. The powder XRD measurements were performed at pressure up to 15 GPa from room temperature to 15 K with a typical temperature interval of 10 K. Rietveld full-profile refinements of the XRD pattern were performed using the GSAS (General Structural Analysis System) package. The use of the same sample batch with similar experimental conditions (Ne pressure medium, ruby scale, DAC, and cryostat) and small X-ray beam sizes permits reliable comparison on the magnetic and structural transitions.
Acknowledgments
We thank C. Kenney-Benson, J. Liu, and C. Lu for their assistance; Z. Mao for helping with data analyses; and A. Wheat for editing the manuscript. We are also grateful to Wenge Yang, Yusheng Zhao, and Guoyin Shen for discussions. Portions of this work were performed at the High Pressure Collaborative Access Team (HPCAT Sector 16), Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. HPCAT operations are supported by the National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy under Award DE-NA0001974 and by the Basic Energy Sciences, Department of Energy (DOE-BES) under Award DE-FG02-99ER45775, with partial instrumentation funding by the National Science Foundation. Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory is supported by DOE-BES under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. Work at The University of Texas at Austin is supported by Energy Frontier Research in Extreme Environments (EFree) and the Carnegie/DOE Alliance Center. Work at the Chinese Academy of Sciences is supported by National Science Foundation and Ministry of Science and Technology of China through research projects.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
†This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
References
- 1.McMillan PF. New materials from high-pressure experiments. Nat Mater. 2002;1(1):19–25. doi: 10.1038/nmat716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schilling JS. Superconductivity in the alkali metals. High Press Res. 2006;26(1):145–163. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mao HK, et al. Elasticity and rheology of iron above 220 GPa and the nature of the Earth's inner core. Nature. 1998;396(6713):741–743. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oganov AR, Ono S. Theoretical and experimental evidence for a post-perovskite phase of MgSiO3 in Earth’s D” layer. Nature. 2004;430(6998):445–448. doi: 10.1038/nature02701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao L, et al. Superconductivity up to 164 K in HgBa2Cam–1CumO2m+2+δ (m =1, 2, and 3) under quasihydrostatic pressures. Phys Rev B. 1994;50(6):4260–4263. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.50.4260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kamihara Y, Watanabe T, Hirano M, Hosono H. Iron-based layered superconductor LaO1-xFexFeAs (x = 0.05-0.12) with Tc = 26 K. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(11):3296–3297. doi: 10.1021/ja800073m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rotter M, Tegel M, Johrendt D. Superconductivity at 38 K in the iron arsenide Ba1-xKxFe2As2. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101(10):107006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.107006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang XC, et al. The superconductivity at 18 K in LiFeAs system. Solid State Commun. 2008;148(11-12):538. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hsu FC, et al. Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(38):14262–14264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807325105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.de la Cruz C, et al. Magnetic order close to superconductivity in the iron-based layered LaO1-xFxFeAs systems. Nature. 2008;453(7197):899–902. doi: 10.1038/nature07057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang Q, et al. Neutron-diffraction measurements of magnetic order and a structural transition in the parent BaFe2As2 compound of FeAs-based high-temperature superconductors. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101(25):257003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.257003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Torikachvili MS, Bud’ko SL, Ni N, Canfield PC, Hannahs ST. Effect of pressure on transport and magnetotransport properties in CaFe2As2 single crystals. Phys Rev B. 2009;80(1):014521. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alireza PL, et al. Superconductivity up to 29 K in SrFe2As2 and BaFe2As2 at high pressures. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21(1):012208. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/1/012208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mani A, Ghosh N, Paulraj S, Bharathi A, Sundar CS. Pressure-induced superconductivity in BaFe2As2 single crystal. EPL. 2009;87(1):17004. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhao K, et al. Superconductivity above 33 K in Ca1-xNaxFe2As2. J Phys Condens Matter. 2010;22(22):222203. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/22/222203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pratt DK, et al. Coexistence of competing antiferromagnetic and superconducting phases in the underdoped Ba(Fe0.953Co0.047)2As2 compound using X-ray and neutron scattering techniques. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103(8):087001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.087001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Urbano RR, et al. Distinct high-T transitions in underdoped Ba1-xKxFe2As2. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105(10):107001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.107001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yildirim T. Strong coupling of the Fe-spin state and the As-As hybridization in iron-pnictide superconductors from first-principle calculations. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102(3):037003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.037003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fernandes RM, et al. Effects of nematic fluctuations on the elastic properties of iron arsenide superconductors. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105(15):157003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.157003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chu JH, et al. In-plane resistivity anisotropy in an underdoped iron arsenide superconductor. Science. 2010;329(5993):824–826. doi: 10.1126/science.1190482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kotegawa H, Sugawara H, Tou H. Abrupt emergence of pressure-induced superconductivity of 34 K in SrFe2As2: A resistivity study under pressure. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2009;78(1):013709. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Colombier E, Bud’ko SL, Ni N, Canfield PC. Complete pressure-dependent phase diagrams for SrFe2As2 and BaFe2As2. Phys Rev B. 2009;79(22):224518. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kimber SAJ, et al. Similarities between structural distortions under pressure and chemical doping in superconducting BaFe2As2. Nat Mater. 2009;8(6):471–475. doi: 10.1038/nmat2443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang SJ, et al. Effect of pressure on the iron arsenide superconductor LixFeAs (x = 0.8, 1.0, 1.1) Phys Rev B. 2009;80(1):014506. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang SJ, et al. Superconductivity at 31 K in the “111”-type iron arsenide superconductor Na1-xFeAs induced by pressure. EPL. 2009;88(4):47008. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu QQ, et al. Pressure-induced isostructural phase transition and correlation of FeAs coordination with the superconducting properties of 111-type Na1-xFeAs. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(20):7892–7896. doi: 10.1021/ja2009949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duncan WJ, et al. High pressure study of BaFe2As2—the role of hydrostaticity and uniaxial stress. J Phys Condens Matter. 2010;22(5):052201. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/5/052201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yamazaki T, et al. Appearance of pressure-induced superconductivity in BaFe2As2 under hydrostatic conditions and its extremely sensitivity to uniaxial stress. Phys Rev B. 2010;81(22):224511. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smirnov GV. General properties of nuclear resonant scattering. Hyperfine Interact. 1999;123/124(22):31–71. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rotter M, et al. Spin-density-wave anomaly at 140 K in the ternary iron arsenide BaFe2As2. Phys Rev B. 2008;78(2):020503. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nomura T, et al. Crystallographic phase transition and high-TC superconductivity in LaFeAsO: F. Supercond Sci Technol. 2008;21(12):125028. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Qiu Y, et al. Crystal structure and antiferromagnetic order in NdFeAsO1-xFx (x=0.0 and 0.2) superconducting compounds from neutron diffraction measurements. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101(25):257002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.257002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chandra P, Coleman P, Larkin AI. Ising transition in frustrated Heisenberg models. Phys Rev Lett. 1990;64(1):88–91. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nandi S, et al. Anomalous suppression of the orthorhombic lattice distortion in superconducting Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 single crystals. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(5):057006. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.057006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kasahara S, et al. Electronic nematicity above the structural and superconducting transition in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2. Nature. 2012;486(7403):382–385. doi: 10.1038/nature11178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yildirim T. Origin of the 150-K anomaly in LaFeAsO: competing antiferromagnetic interactions, frustration, and a structural phase transition. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101(5):057010. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.057010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mazin II, Johannes MD. A key role for unusual spin dynamics in ferropnictides. Nat Phys. 2009;5(2):141–145. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sturhahn W. CONUSS and PHOENIX: Evaluation of nuclear resonant scattering data. Hyperfine Interact. 2000;125(1–4):149–172. [Google Scholar]